11_Models of Addiction Models of Addiction There are many models that have tried to explain addiction. Here, I will briefly review five of the main models. Stress-Reduction/Behavioural Moral-Volitional Model Personality Model Dispositional Disease Model Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) Stress-Reduction/Behavioural Model This is based on the notion that people learn to use alcohol because it helps them cope with stressors, and reduces emotional stress reactions. Use might then become abuse, and then dependence, if drinking is a person’s main coping strategy. Hence, “Given an individual with no alternative models on which to draw for effective coping behaviours, drug use becomes a learned response for dealing with personal and social problems” (Krivanek, 1995, p20). Suggested Therapy: Learning alternative ways of coping with stress/emotions. Moral-Volitional Model Alcoholism is viewed as volitional, i.e. as a consequence of the exercise of choice, or free will. An alcoholic is thus, in this model, seen as morally weak, or degenerate. This perspective was upheld by the US Supreme 11_Models of Addiction Court in 1988, in Traynor v Turnage, when it defined alcoholism as “wilful misconduct.” This model positions alcoholism as caused by a lack of will-power/moral fibre. This implies that the solution to alcoholism is for the alcoholic to impose control and drink less. Personality Model This is a psychoanalytically informed model, which “views alcoholism as a symptom of an underlying personality disorder, a disturbance of normal development” (Miller and Kurtz, 1994, p160). From this perspective, addiction might be seen as “a habitual response and a source of gratification and security, so that when a person becomes addicted, it is not to a chemical, but to an experience” (Peele, S., 1991, p42). Recommended treatment: psychotherapy/psychoanalysis. The Disease Model The disease model views alcoholism as a disease: “Most physicians, counsellors, and psychologists view alcoholism according to the disease model. Alcoholism is seen as a disease, with treatment emphasizing total abstinence” (Smith and Smith-Stevens, 1998, p272). The dispositional disease model rests on four assumptions (Milam and Ketcham, 1983): 11_Models of Addiction 1. Alcoholism is a unitary disease entity that is qualitatively distinct and discontinuous from normality. As with pregnancy, there are no grey areas; one either is, or is not, alcoholic. 2. The causes of alcoholism are solely biological, rooted in heredity and physiology. Behavioural, family, and personality disturbances are merely symptoms of the underlying physical abnormality in how the body reacts to alcohol. 3. The definitive symptom of developed alcoholism is an inability to control consumption after the first drink. This is an inexorable reaction to the chemical ethanol, resulting from the physical abnormality. 4. This condition is irreversible and cannot be cured, only palliated According to this perspective, “Alcohol is an addictive drug only for the minority of its users who are physically susceptible” (Milan and Ketcham, 1983, p24). “In this view, alcoholics bear no responsibility for the development of their problems; they are in fact viewed as incapable of making rational decisions, warranting social intervention to coerce them into treatment” (Miller and Kurtz, 1994, p160). Alcoholics Anonymous AA views alcoholism as being a bio-spiritu-psycho-social problem; this is an inclusive model that rules nothing out. “Of necessity, there will have to be a discussion of matters medical, psychiatric, social, and religious” (AA, 1976, p 19). 11_Models of Addiction In essence, AA views alcoholism as a spiritual problem. As with the Disease Model, AA argues that the full-blown alcoholic will never be able to drink with control again and must abstain from alcohol.