An application of hyperintricate numbers – the matrix symmetrizer classification Jim Adams 2014 18th February 2014 Abstract. In 1910 Frobenius [Fr68] proved that any matrix is the product of two symmetric ones. We seek to understand the classification of these symmetric matrices. Note. When we refer to [Ad12], we will be concerned mainly with section 6 of that work, and for [Ad13] mostly with section 11 of it. Lemma. (a) [Ad12] If a matrix is symmetric the layers are composed each of basis element of type i only, multiplied by a real factor, for an even number of layers, or they are of the form a1 + c + d. Proof. If an i layer was of the form a1 + bi + c + d, then for each J-abelian part in its minimal summation, this could be expanded out to contain terms with an odd number of i’s, which is antisymmetric. (b) If a matrix is antisymmetric, the layers are basis elements of type i multiplied by a real factor for an odd number of layers, the remainder being of the form a1 + c + d. Proof. Similar. Lemma. Let W be a symmetric intricate number. Then W-1 is symmetric if it exists. Proof. Let W = w1 + w + w, so W-1 = (w1 – w – w)/(w2 – w2 – w2), is symmetric. Lemma. Let W be a symmetric intricate and X and Y be arbitrary intricate. Then if XT is the transpose of X, XTWX is symmetric. Proof. Put X = x1 + xi + x + x. Let us compute XTYX. For the real part of Y, XTX is symmetric, since this is (x2 + x2 + x2 + x2)1 + 2(xx + xx) + 2(xx – xx), for the imaginary, i, part of Y, XTiX is (x2 + x2 – x2 – x2)i, for the actual, , part of Y XTX is 2(xx + xx)1 + (x2 – x2 + x2 – x2) + 2(xx – xx), and for the phantom, , part of Y, XTX is 2(xx + xx)1 + 2(xx – xx) + (x2 – x2 – x2 + x2). Corollary. Let A and D be symmetric intricate numbers and C = BT. Then what is known from [Ad13] as the inverse of the Schur complement Sc = (D – CA-1B)-1 is symmetric. Lemma. Let M be a general symmetric matrix and X be an arbitrary matrix. Then if XT is the transpose of X, XTMX is symmetric. Proof. Any m m matrix M may be extended by the introduction of unit diagonal elements, the remainder of the elements in the extension part being zero, to a 2n 2n n-hyperintricate matrix. Consider a symmetric matrix M and extend it to a matrix L in the aforementioned manner. This lemma follows as a generalisation, under a hyperintricate representation, of the previous lemma, in which Y may contain an even number of purely i layers to make it symmetric. Theorem. (Frobenius, 1910). Let M, M be m m symmetric matrices to be determined. Then any m m matrix P may be represented by MM. We will first establish this theorem in the case m = 2. Proof. To start off the induction in effect for the general case, let n = 1, P = q1 + ri + t + u, and L = a1 + c + d. Then L-1 = (a1 – c – d)/(a2 – c2 – d2), and P = (PL-1)L, where PL-1 is symmetric, that is PL-1 = [(qa – tc – ud)1 – (td – uc)i – rd + rc]/(a2 – c2 – d2) is symmetric, so td – uc = 0 and (a2 – c2 – d2) 0. We now consider the case n = 2. A B Theorem. Say L = [ ] is symmetric, where A, B, C and D are (n – 1)-hyperintricate C D matrices, then A and D are symmetric, and B is the transpose of C: B = CT, with L-1 represented in the case n = 2 as follows. E F From [Ad13], L-1 = [ ], where G H E = A-1 + A-1BScBTA-1, H = S c, and since A-1 and Sc are symmetric A-1 = A-1T, S c = S cT so that by the lemma E and H are symmetric, whereas F = -A-1BSc, G = -ScBTA-1. We will represent a general 2n 2n hyperintricate matrix by Q R V=[ ], T U so that we wish to prove that there exists a V = (VL-1)L, QE + RG QF + RH VL-1 = [ ], TE + UG TF + UH where VL-1 is symmetric under a suitable configuration of L. What are the constraints on E, F, H and G, so this holds for arbitrary Q, R, T and U? Then in the case n = 2, A and D, being diagonal, have no i layer, whereas if B has no i layer then nor has C, and if B has an i layer component, then for C the layer component is –i (the transpose iT of i is –i). References Ad12 J.H. Adams, Introduction to intricate and hyperintricate numbers I, 2012, to be found in Innovation in mathematics, online at www.jimhadams.com, 2014. Ad13 J.H. Adams, Introduction to intricate and hyperintricate numbers II, 2012, to be found in Innovation in mathematics, online at www.jimhadams.com, 2014. Fr68 G.F. Frobenius, 81. Über die mit einer Matrix vertaushbaren Matrizen, Gesammelte Abhadlungen, vol III, Springer, 1968.