Draft on Date 26/06/2012 (2012/13-2014/15) 1.1 Background of Sindhuli District Sindhuli district is inner terai district. The district is hemmed by long stretched Siwalik range in the southern side and the Koshi River in the northern side. Likewise Udayapur district and Siraha districts lie in the eastern side and Kavre, Makwanpur and Rautahat districts lie in the western side of the district. There are 53 VDCs and a municipality in the district. The population of the district as per the preliminary report of census 2068 depicts 294621 where male population shares 141573 and female 153048 numbers. There are 58270 households where 5.06 family members dwell in each household in average. The population growth rate is very low that is 0.52 % in comparison with national figure that is 1.4%. Education status For development and promotion of quality education the School Sector Improvement Project (SSIP) is being implemented in the district since FY 066/067. Under this program Early childhood development, Determination to access to education, Literacy and lifelong education, Enhancement of quality education, Teacher education and development, Capacity building for service delivery, School management and monitoring, School support and Non salary support or per child funding programs are being undergone in the district. The number of educational institutions composite of community and institutions are 992. Amongst the total number child development centers are 413, primary schools are 373, lower secondary schools are 96, secondary schools are 52 and higher secondary schools are 58. In Informal education there are 5 programs are running and more recently 5,140 persons are benefited in the district. Drinking water and sanitation situation 1 Water and sanitation has been a major concern in terms of public health in the district. Not only DDC itself is implementing water and sanitation promotion programs but also line agencies and nongovernmental organizations in the district are making endeavor to get rid of water and sanitation problems. Up to the date 70 % populations have easy access to piped hygienic drinking water. As the district have envisioned the open defecation free district within 2016 and in action, 2 VDCs and 4 wards have declared as open defecation free VDCs as well as wards so far. Forest and soil conservation situation Sindhuli district is near to 60% forest covered district. There are 421 community forest groups, 411 leasehold forest users group and remaining is government managed forest. In figure the CFUGs are managing 70628 Ha and LHFUGs are managing 2704 Ha forest area in the district. The state own forest area is 854 sq km in the district. There in the district 12 forest range posts under 2 Illaka forest offices. Due to the narrow breadth Sindhuli district makes divers climatic floras and faunas. Tropical Sal forest found up to the 1000 m altitude and gradually as the altitude raises, different types of vegetation is found in the district. Upper temperate forest is the highest altitude vegetation of the district. The common vegetation in this altitude is Pinus roxburghi and Rhododendron. Deforestation and encroachment are major problems in forest management in the district. Unstable Siwalik range is discharging huge amount of silt which ultimately heighten the river bed and in the same time flood causes heavy loss in land, lives and property. Road and other infrastructure situation Road B. P. Highway Midhill Highway Agricultural Road Feeder Road Infrastructures Service centers Agricultures and Livestock Range posts Educations Institutions Social sectors facilities Junar Cold storage Agriculture and livestock situation 2 Agriculture of the district is in transitional stage to commercialization from traditional subsistence farming. The road – BP Highway construction and other infrastructure development are favoring commercialization of agriculture. Though, there is several technology related production and marketing related supply problems. Land use status of the district in hectare is 251879 where cultivable land makes up 24.89% and cultivated is 79.39%. Irrigation facility is still gloomy. There is 70.12% of cultivated land which is beyond irrigation access. Only 17.93% of cultivated land has access to all season’s irrigation. Near to 12% of cultivated land have wet weather irrigation. For providing effective and efficient agriculture service, DADO have established 6 agriculture service centers and 3 contact centers in the district. There are 7 pocket areas in regard to production like cereal, fruits, vegetables and spices. Food balance sheet of the district is hopeful in terms of its recovering tendency. In FY 067/068 1877 MT food was deficit whereas FY 068/069 showed remarkable recovers. In FY 068/069 the deficit shrunk to 283MT. For the qualitative and quantitative promotion of livestock services and products the district livestock service office has established 6 service centers and 7 sub centers in the district and services are providing there from. There in the district 7 livestock pocket centers are functioning. The active livestock committees are 19 and groups are 156 and in the district. Main activities undergo from the DLSO are livestock treatment, genetic improvement, fodder promotion, commercial farming of livestock, marketing and cooperative development. Composite HDI places the Sindhuli district in 43rd rank. Individually GDI and life expectancy is considerably low amongst the calculated indices of the district. District Development Plan is formulated and implemented incorporating settlement level prioritized projects to reduce the poverty of the district in annual basis. However the expected results as well as outcome have not yet been turned up. There are many factors impeding the progress and achievement. Among them a factor that is seemingly trifle but in reality a very decisive playing a pivotal role to impede the results and achievements. That is result based monitoring and evaluation of the intervention. Monitoring and evaluation is not new and unpracticed activities in our participatory planning culture. The periodic multiyear plans, LSGA 2055, LSGAR 2056, Directives have provided the monitoring and evaluation provisions. But as per the spirits of these documents we are not able to arrange the result based monitoring and evaluation so far and conducted in accordance. We are focusing on oversight activities instead of result based monitoring and evaluation. What we are doing in the name of the monitoring and evaluation is supervising the actions that was said to be taken in the inception of planning period. But the effective monitoring and evaluation process involves tracking strategies and actions being taken by partners and non partners, and figuring 3 out what new strategies and actions need to be taken to ensure progress towards the most important results. Programs and projects with strong monitoring and evaluation components tend to stay on track. Additionally, problems are often detected earlier, which reduces the likelihood of having major cost overruns or time delays later.DDC Sindhuli is also planning monitoring and evaluation plan for some priority first (P1) project of different line ministry agencies of Sindhuli district. 1.1.2 Vision/goals of Sindhuli District (District development plan) “Jungle ra Junar, Sindhuli Jilla ko Bikash ko Adhar.” DDC Sindhuli has not yet formulated periodic plan that is why the district has no clear long term vision and accessible goals. However development slogan of the district has been evolved and passed by the DDC council 7 years ago. However it is long since the evolution of the slogan but has not yet faded and threadbare. The importance and relevance is still live. The slogan gives emphasis to fruits, flora and faunas available in the district. The slogan says Jungle ra Junar, Sindhuli Jilla ko Bikash ko Adhar. DDP is formulated each year. DDP doesn't target the vision and goals due to not having the district's own vision and goal. Obviously, DDP is settlement level prioritized projects therefore it seeks to reduce the poverty through agriculture and infrastructure development. The DDP incorporates the software projects like capacity building and awareness rising in regard to public health and governance. 1.1.3 Purpose of the District Development Plan (If it is separated from Vision/goals) Obviously the purpose of DDP is reducing the district level poverty through people's meaningful participation in mobilizing resources available in the district. Reducing the prevailing poverty is not single factor contributions and interventions. It needs multidimensional efforts and contribution. More definitely the below given points asserts the purpose of formulation of DDP Promotion of agricultural comparative advantage sectors like fruits, milk, meat and vegetables. Agricultural road connectivity to comparative advantage area. Agricultural productivity promotion through management and construction of traditional as well as sector irrigation systems. Promotion of life rural sanitation through ODF and drinking water availability. Protection of agricultural land and human habitat of the district against flood induced havoc through soil conservation initiations. Income promotion through forest management and ownership and promotion of non timber forest business. 4 1.1.4 Present situations of M&E at district In the DDP M/E has been given high priorities since the promulgation of LSGA. There is incessant provision of M/E in all periodic plans that were formulated in time to time and up to the present interim three years plan. Despite the provisions, the effective result based monitoring has not yet been conducted in different line ministry agencies development interventions in the district. Even local bodies interventions are not yet monitored for achieving the targeted results. There are many factors discouraging the conduction of result based monitoring. The structural dilemmas are one of them. The below drawn table can clarify the structural ambiguities in conduction of monitoring and evaluation. M/E provisioning sources TYP(2067-2070) LSGA 2055 Section 210 LSGAR 2056 Section 202 DDC/VDC Grant Regulation Directives 2067 M/E structures Problems/Dilemmas M/E will be made result based, regular and reliable. Feedback will be incorporated in future plan. Respective district legislatorChairperson DDC Chairperson- Member DDC Chairperson nominated DDC 2 members- Member Necessary DDCO Staff- Member District level monitoring and supervising committee DDC vice chairperson – Coordinator 2 DDC members- Member PM and Admin Officer- Member LDO and other district level government officials constitute the supervision and monitoring committee. Implementing structures in local level is weak and feeble. Seems high sounding in reference to practices Hiding and seeking legislators, DDC chairperson is available but DDC members are not available. Therefore this committee is virtually defunct. Almost members are not in existence except a DDC official. The committee only monitors the implementation status and basically focuses on the actions rather than progress on achievements. The structural dilemma has brought the M/E less effective in development projects and interventions. Our monitoring that is we have been conduction since long only gives the answer of the question, Are we taking the actions we said we would take rather than making the progress on achieving the results that we said we wanted to achieve. 5 1.2. Impact and Outcome Indicators- Selected only based on priority (Referred to Sector Indicators in DPMAS) Related Office Name of Program / Project Impact / Outcome 1. D D C Impact evaluation Established of COMCAP harmonized society. 3. W S S D O 4. D F O 5. D S C O 6. D A D O 7. D L S O 8. D E O Cooperative farming/irrigation Increased productivity vegetable. Baseline Value (July 15, 2012) Target Value (3 years later) (July 2015) 0 1 DIDC 0 1 DIDC 0 1 No. of diarrheal patients decreased. No. of typhoid and jaundice patients decreased. No. of worm patients decreased. DHO 8000 taps ODF 2 VDCs 3000 taps ODF 80% Purchasing capabilities increased. Improvement of forest condition. No. of people visit to health post/hospital due to water borne disease decreased. Kitchen gardening promoted through water availability. Area under year round of irrigation increased. Production of vegetable per ha. increased. DFO Cinnamo n plantn: 0 ha. : 5ha. Health Post / DHO Benificie ries: 13 HHs Benifici eries: 26 HHs Ratanchura - Enhanced Tinkanya livelihood of agricultural road community through road facilities. Total sanitation Decreased in program. water borne (Mahadev Danda) epidemics. Decreased in health service expenses. Established well sanitized village Leasehold Forest Positive impact in Program livelihood and (Ratanchura environment and VDC) soil conservation. District Soil Enhanced health Conservation status of Program community. (Water source protection, KNP-10) Dispute resolution through community mediation. (No.) Capacity enhancement of community through community mediation. Establishment of social sector infrastructure. Meaningful participation enhanced in decision making. Transportation facilities enhanced. Increased Access to market centre. Source of Informati on DIDC Impact evaluation Enhanced of VDC grant of livelihood of Tinkanya VDC people through VDC grant. 2. D T O Impact/Outcome Indicators Livestock Enhanced cooperative livelihood of Meat production increased. (Piggery), KNP- 2. cooperative members. Impact study of Enhanced social Participants of Dalit and scholarship status of Dalit and Janajati students in school recipient (Dalit and Janajati in the education increased. Janajati) at community. Ratanchura. 6 DADO DLSO DEO/F LASH Report 0 ha. .28 mt 0 5 ha. 1.2 mt 1 1-3. Key Output indicators (Selected) Related Office 1. DDC 2. DTO 3. WSS DO 4. DFO 5. DSC O Name of Program / Project Impact/Outcome Indicators Intermediate Indicators Output Indicators Impact Dispute resolution evaluation of through community COMCAP mediation. (No.) Capacity enhancement of community through community mediation. Impact Establishment of evaluation of social sector VDC grant infrastructure. of Tinkanya VDC Meaningful participation enhanced in decision making Ratanchura Tinkanya agricultural road Transportation facilities enhanced. Increased Access to market centre. Total sanitation program. (Mahadev Danda) No. of diarrheal patients decreased. Input-Process No. of dispute registered/ resolved No. of dispute registered/ resolved Budget Training Mediators Budget Training Social marketing No. of schools, community building, common taps. No. of attendant of target group in public decision making mechanism. Road Budget Manpower Transportation of agriproduces (Junar). Access of safe drinking water No. of typhoid and jaundice patients decreased. No. of worm patients decreased. Access of safe drinking water Leasehold Forest Program (Ratanchura VDC) Purchasing capabilities increased. Improvement of forest condition. Plantation of NTFPs. Production of NTFPs. NTFP forest coverage. District Soil Conservation Program (Water No. of people visit to health post/hospital decreased. Health improvement. Less health expenses Access of safe drinking water 7 Source of Informatio n for output VDC/DIDC VDC/DIDC VDC/DIDC Budget Training Reflect sessions Budget Manpower Social intervention VDC/DIDC DDC/DIDC DDC/DIDC Budget Training Poster/pamphlets Budget Training Poster/pamphlets Budget Training Poster/pamphlets Budget Training Seedlings Health Post / DHO Budget Training Seedlings Financial inputs People’s participation Technical inputs DFO Health Post / DHO Health Post / DHO DFO Health Post / DHO Baseline Value of output indicator (July 15, 2012) Target Value of output indicator (July 2013) 6. DAD O 7. DLS O 8. DEO source protection, KNP-10) Kitchen gardening promoted through water availability. Kitchen gardens establish. Financial inputs People’s participation Technical inputs ASC/DADO Cooperative farming/irrig ation Area under year round irrigation increased by 5 ha. Irrigation facility enhanced. ASC/DADO Production of vegetable per ha. increased. Meat production increased. Productivity of crops increased. No. of pigs and quality of meat increased. Financial inputs People’s participation Technical inputs Budget Technical inputs Training Budget Training Slaughter house Participants of Dalit and Janajati students in school education increased. Profile of beneficiaries. Budget Identification of target beneficiaries. Training Tools DEO Livestock cooperative (Piggery), K N P- 2. Impact study of scholarship recipient (Dalit and Janajati) at Ratanchura. 8 ASC/DADO DLSO 0 1 2. M&E Activities 2-1. P1 and DDC/VDC grant program/project Monitoring and Reporting a. List of P1 Program/Project of sectoral organization The P1 Programs/Projects which should be monitored and reported in this Fiscal Year are listed as follows. Referred from to annual program form 1 (Page 2) Name of the District Organization 1. DDC 2. DTO 3. WSSD O Name of P1 program/ Project DDC grant with B w P VDC grant Municipality grant Dis,Disadvantage,….gr oup program (DAGs OBC uplift Committee Suspension bridge sectoral program DRSP SWAP Social security program Marginalized indigenous upliftment program LGCDP RWSP Small Irrigation Program RRRSDP Chakmake WSP Pipalmadi WSP Gadeuli Thulitar WSP Sitalpati WSP Dudhauli – Jalkine WSP Sarswati WSP Barun WSP Tinkanya WSP Khurkot WSP Chanaute Ginchaur WSP Khangsang WSP Lakhanpur WSP Pu. Jha. WSP Kudule Tallo tar WSP Duration (Program/Project period) (Fy. 2068/069) Indicative Budget Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) 19563 132205 35277 475 Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) 500 2795 Termination on Dec. 2012 Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) 55346 12200 95860 Regular (yearly performance basis) 200 Termination on Dec. 2012 Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) 18876 5400 2500 Termination on Dec. 2012 Completion on 2069/70 Completion on 2069/70 Re-evalution phase Completion on 2069/70 Completion on 2069/70 Re-evalution phase Completion on 2069/70 Completion on 2069/70 Completion on 2069/70 Completion on 2071/72 Completion on 2070/71 Completion on 2070/71 Completion on 2070/71 Completed 9 122935 Name of the District Organization 4. DFO 5. DSCO 6. DADO 7. DLSO 8. DEO Name of P1 program/ Project Nipane WSP Dandagaun WSP Bitijor WSP Sirthauli-Bairaha WSP Kholagaun WSP Ghaderitar WSP Silame K N P WSP Jha. Ra. WSP Betini WSP Maintenance of WSP Fesibility survey WSP Total Sanitation Progam (TSP) Water Safety Program (WSP) Community Forestry Development Program Leasehold Forestry Development Program (LHF) National Forestry Development Program District Soil Conservation Program Agriculture Extension Program CMIASP Cooperative Farming, Small Irrigation and Fertilizer and Seed Transportation Livestock Service Program LHF and L/S Devt. Non-Formal Education SSRP Duration (Program/Project period) (Fy. 2068/069) Indicative Budget Completion on 2071/72 Completion on 2072/73 Completion on 2072/73 Completion on 2072/73 Completion on 2072/73 Completion on 2072/73 Completion on 2072/73 Completion on 2072/73 Completion on 2072/73 Yr. round Yr. round Till 2016 AD Yr. round Regular (yearly performance basis) 1645 Regular (yearly performance basis) 3263 Regular (yearly performance basis) 4954 Regular (yearly performance basis) 9158 Regular (yearly performance basis) 15601 Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) 375 2330 Regular (yearly performance basis) 10722 Regular (yearly performance basis) Regular (yearly performance basis) Till 2015 AD 3390 10184 284633 10 b. List of District-level own program/project (DDC/VDC grant) – Only selected Referred progress of monitoring report, annual program plan Name of the District Organization 1. DDC 2. DTO 3. WSSDO 4. DFO 5. DSCO 6. DADO 7. DLSO 8. DEO Name of Program/ Project Impact evaluation of COMCAP Duration (Program/Project period) 1 yr. Indicative Budget 500 (proposed) 250 251(proposed) 80000 Impact evaluation of VDC grant of Tinkanya VDC Ratanchura - Tinkanya agricultural road Total sanitation program. (Mahadev Danda) 1 yr. 1 yr. 4200 (for all VDCs) Leasehold Forest Program (Ratanchura VDC) District Soil Conservation Program (Ratanchura) Cooperative farming/irrigation 1 yr. 150 1 yr. 10000 1 yr. 300 Agricultural cooperative (Piggery), K N P- 2. Impact study of scholarship recipient (Dalit and Janajati) at Ratanchura. 1 yr. 435 1yr. 250 1 yr. 2-2. Site Visit of selected P1 and local level Porgram/project SN Name of Selected Purpose of Visit place Responsible Program/Project Visit 1 Impact Data Ratanchura DDC (DDC) evaluation of collection, COMCAP Monitoring 2 Impact Data Tinkanya DDC (DDC) evaluation of collection, VDC grant of Monitoring Tinkanya VDC 3 Ratanchura Survey, Ratanchura, DDC, DTO (DTO) Tinkanya Monitoring Tinkanya agricultural road 4 Total sanitation Data Mahadevdanda WSSDO (WSSDO training. collection, ) (Mahadev Monitoring Danda) 5 Leasehold Forest Monitoring Ratanchura DFO 11 Timing (Quarter) Monthly/Trimester Monthly/Trimester Monthly/Trimester Monthly/Trimester Monthly/Trimester (DFO) Program (Ratanchura VDC) 6 (DSCO) District Soil Conservation Program 7 Cooperative (DADO) farming/irrigatio n 8 Agricultural (DLSO) cooperative (Piggery), K N P2. 9 Impact study of (DEO) scholarship recipient (Dalit and Janajati) at Ratanchura. Survey, KNP-10 Monitoring DSCO Monthly/Trimester Survey, Project area Monitoring DADO Monthly/Trimester Monitoring KNP-2 DLSO Monthly/Trimester Survey, Ratanchura Monitoring DEO Monthly/Trimester 2-3. Review meeting Review meeting Half yearly Yearly Others Planned Months and date Jan 5th 2013 July 7nd 2013 2015 12 Planned agenda Progress of M/E plan preparation of M/E report Dissemination of M/E report 3. Capacity Development (CD) Plan 3-1. Description of CD this fiscal year 3-2. Plan of CD this fiscal year The financial plan of CD in this Fiscal year is planned as follows. SN Activities Target 2015 Target (Annual) 2013 Responsible Tentative Cost Estimate Agency GoN SMES2 Others Grand Total a. Institutional Capacity Development (CD) Plan 1 Preparing an 3 1 NPC/DDC 700 implementation /TF/SMES procedure of M&E plan 2 Conducting M&E of 3 1 DDC 1200 selected /TF program/project 3 Preparing M&E 3 1 TF 300 report of selected program/ project 4 Holding of 3 1 DDC 350 Dissemination /TF/ Seminar/Workshop (M&E Progress report, Third party) DPMAS 300 5 b. Individual Capacity Development (CD) Plan 1 M&E related Training 1.1 Indicator development / selection and testing Training 1.2 Baseline and Target setting Training 1.3 M & E Training 1.4 RBM reporting 2 Other 2.1 Cross-learning visit to model M & E implemented countries. (Note) As a part of the whole set of M&E Plan and CD Plan, SMES2 can support only partially on technical and financial support related to soft parts ( training, workshop) of the proposed activities in the cost sharing basis with Government of Nepal. 13 District M&E Coordination Taskforce Sindhuli Thank you 14 Annex I. Form 1 Page 1 of P1 Program/Project (Filled) S.N. Name of P1 Program/Project Annex1