ÇANKAYA UNIVERSITY - FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE

advertisement

ÇANKAYA UNIVERSITY - FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE

Department of Interior Architecture - 2014-2015 Spring Semester

IAGR 566 - UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPT OF SOUNDSCAPE

WEBSITE : http://iagr566.cankaya.edu.tr

Assist. Prof. Dr. Papatya Nur Dökmeci Yörükoğlu

SYLLABUS

COURSE DESCRIPTION

The course concentrates on the recently emerged field, ‘soundscape’. The main components, integrating built environment and architecture, space, spatial perception, experience, and basics of sound analysis are covered in detail. In addition, methodological aspects on soundscape studies are discussed within the framework of this graduate course. The course is designed through integrating several different readings and a variety of evaluations on these texts to fulfill the requirements of a graduate level study and research.

COURSE OBJECTIVES

The cognitive mastery and developmental objectives of the course in relation with the soundscape topic includes that the student will be able to;

Mastery objectives;

- Define a learned knowledge with one’s own words (Cognitive Process Dimension-1) 1

- List and compare sound perception - experience of a real life example (CPD-1, 2) 1

- Classify through the analysis of other examples (CPD-3) 1

Developmental Objectives;

- State the components of soundscapes; (1) built environment, (2) sound environment, (3) contextual experience (CPD-1) 1

- Describe each component in detail (CPD-1) 1

- Select related articles on the soundscape topic from the literature (CPD-1) 1

- Explain aim and methodological aspects of given article (CPD-2) 1

- Identify factors and outcomes of given article (CPD-3) 1

- Evaluate the aspects relating soundscape concept in the given article (CPD-5) 1

- Propose a case soundscape study (CPD-6) 1

LEARNING OUTCOMES

- The basic concepts regarding soundscape and its components (1) built environment, (2) sound environment, (3) contextual experience

- Achieving skills on four cognitive process dimensions of learning; knowledge (CPD-1), comprehension (CPD-2), application (CPD-3), evaluation (CPD-5) and synthesis (CPD-6) through the soundscape framework and studies, applicable to other academic areas.

TEACHING POLICY

The course is conducted through interactive learning bases. Orientation is more research-based than teaching-based. Students are expected to accomplish 9 tasks progressively following the cognitive processing dimensions 1 . Reading and research is the main tasks throughout the course. Presentations including visual and audio media take part in each course to convey basic knowledge on soundscape research. Open discussions play important part during a course hour.

ATTENDANCE

*Attendance to at least %70 of the courses is mandatory by university policy!

Attendance lower than 80% will be graded as NA.

* 27/03/2015 – Deadline to withdraw from the course!!!

1

ASSESSMENT

Homeworks (9)

Midterm Evaluation

Final Assignment

Interest/Participation

REFERENCE BOOKS

45%

15%

30%

10%

Author(s)

MURRAYR. SCHAFER

BARRY BLESSER, LINDA-

RUTH SALTER

Ed. COLIN RIPLEY, MARCO

POLO, ARTHUR

WRIGGLESWORTH

YI-FU TUAN

E RELPH

Title

OUR SONIC ENVIRONMENT AND THE

SOUNDSCAPE, THE TUNING OF THE WORLD

SPACES SPEAK, ARE YOU LISTENING?

IN THE PLACE OF SOUND

– ARCHITECTURE,

MUSIC, ACOUSTICS

SPACE AND PLACE

PLACE AND PLACELESSNESS

Publisher

Publication

Year

DESTINY

BOOKS

THE MIT

PRESS

CAMBRIDGE

SCHOLARS

PUBLISHING

UNIVERSITY

OF

MINNESOTA

PRESS

1994

2007

2007

2011

PION LIMITED 1976

BILL HILLIER, JULIENNE

HANSON

THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF SPACE

CAMBRIDGE

UNIVERSITY

PRESS

1997

1 LORIN W. ANDERSON,

DAVID R. KRATHWOHL,

PETER W. AIRASIAN,

KATHLEEN A. CRUIKSHANK,

RICHARD E. MAYER, PAUL

R. PINTRICH, JAMES

RATHS, MERLIN C.

WITTROCK

A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A

Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational

Objectives

Abridged

Edition 2000

Krathwohl, David R. (2002). "A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview". Theory Into Practice (Routledge) 41 (4): 212 –

218.

COURSE OUTLINE

WEEK DATE TOPIC(S)

1

2

February, 2015

Introduction: Soundscape and its components

PRE-TEST FOR THE GENERAL KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC

Sound and Soundscape - Definitions and Terms

ASSIGNMENT 1: DEFINING IN YOUR OWN WORDS

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-1)

February, 2015

READING 1A : Introduction (Schaffer, 1994, Our Sonic Environment and the

Soundscape, pg. 3-12)

READING 1B: Introduction to Aural Architecture (Blesser, Salter, 2007, Spaces

Speak, Are You Listening?, pg. 1-9)

3

The Psychological State: Expectation, Perception, Reaction

February, 2015

ASSIGNMENT 2: LISTING & EXPERIENTIAL COMPARISON (MIND TO PAPER)

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-1 and 2)

READING 2: Media Acoustics: Sounds of the American Public Library (Shannon

Mattern, ed. Ripley, 2007, In the Place of Sound, pg. 135-144)

2

6

7

4

5

8

9

10

Contextual Experience

ASSIGNMENT 3: COMPARATIVE DISCUSSION REPORT

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-2)

March, 2015

READING 3A: Ch2: Experiential perspective (Tuan, 2011, Space and Place, pg. 8-18)

READING 3B: Ch1: Place and the phenomenological basis of geography, Ch2: Space and Place (Relph, 1976, Place and Placelessness, pg. 1-29)

READING 3C: Ch1: The problem of space (Hillier, Hanson, 1997, The Social Logic of

Space, pg. 26-33)

Architectonic Soundscapes: Analysis on Architecture and Space

ASSIGNMENT 4: SUMMARY

March, 2015

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-2)

READING 4: Inhabiting Soundscapes: Architecture of the Unseen World (Matteo

Melioli, ed. Ripley, 2007, In the Place of Sound, pg. 135-144)

The Functions within Built Environment

March, 2015

REVIEW AND GETTING READY FOR MIDTERM

March, 2015 MIDTERM EVALUATION on Covered Topics and Readings

Sounds of Daily Life and Soundscape Classifications

ASSIGNMENT 5: CLASSIFICATION PROPOSAL

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-3)

April, 2015

READING 5A: Ch9: Classification (Schaffer, 1994, Our Sonic Environment and the

Soundscape, pg. 133-150)

READING 5B: Towards standardization in soundscape preference assessment

(Brown, Kang, Gjestland, 2011, Applied Acoustics 72, pg. 387

–392)

April, 2015

Understanding Soundscape Research in the Literature and Its Methodology

ASSIGNMENT 6: SELECT MIN. 3 ARTICLES

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-1)

The Objective Matters on Sound and Soundscapes

ASSIGNMENT 7: EXPLAIN AIM & METHODOLOGY

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-2)

April, 2015

READING 7: Indoor soundscaping of different public spaces: analysis on sound environment, architecture and function (Dokmeci, Kang, Johnson, 2011, Forum

Acusticum Conf. Proc.)

3

13

14

11

12

The Subjective Matters on Sound and Soundscapes

ASSIGNMENT 8: IDENTIFY FACTORS & OUTCOMES

April, 2015

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-3)

READING 8: A comparative case study of indoor soundscape approach on objective analyses and subjective evaluations of libraries (Dokmeci, Kang, 2012, Acoustics

Conf. Proc.)

Evaluation of Sound as Resource not Noise and Its Impacts on Community

ASSIGNMENT 9: EVALUATE (APPRAISE)

April, 2015

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-5)

READING 5: Soundscape: An approach to rely on human perception and expertise in the post-modern community noise era (Schulte-Fortkamp, Brooks, Bray, 2007,

Acoustics Today, 3,1, pg. 7-14)

How to Design a Soundscape Study

May, 2015

FINAL ASSIGNMENT

– PLAN/PROPOSE YOUR SOUNDSCAPE STUDY

(COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION-6)

FINAL PRESENTATIONS by the students

May, 2015

POST-TEST FOR THE AFTER COURSE LEARNED KNOWLEDGE/AWARENESS

4

Download