CONFIRMED MINUTES Healthcare Associated Infections Governance Group (HAIGG) Date Tuesday 19 March 2013 Time 0900 –1400 Venue Ministry of Health - No 1 The Terrace Wellington Present Don Mackie (Co-chair) Jane O’Malley (Co-chair) Sally Roberts Deborah Williamson (standing in for Virginia Hope) Bob Buckham Ruth Barratt Margaret Wilsher Grant Storey (Secretariat) In attendance Greg Williams and Dr Dilky Rasiah (PHARMAC) 11am to 1pm Dr Craig Thornley (Ministry for Primary Industries) 11am – 1pm Apologies 1. Arthur Morris, Hasan Bhally, Chris McKenna Welcome and Apologies The Co-chairs opened and welcomed members to the meeting. Apologies were noted. 2. Confirmation of the Minutes The Minutes for the HAIGG meeting of 20 November 2012 were confirmed as a true and accurate record of that meeting. 1 3. Matters Arising a) Consumer Representative for the HAIGG Noted: attempts to identify a candidate for appointment to the HAIGG have been unsuccessful. Action Point: i. b) The Co-chairs will identify representative on the HAIGG. a candidate for the consumer Terms of Reference The representative for the Infection Prevention and Control Nurse from National Division of Infection Control Nurses informed HAIGG about the name change for the representative group. The group is now known as Infection Prevention and Control Nurses College, New Zealand Nurses Organisation (NZNO). Agreed: that the Membership section of the Terms of Reference be amended to reflect the new name for the representative group, i.e., Infection Prevention and Control Nurses College, NZNO. c) Workforce Development and Post Graduate Education Papers The subgroup has further information to gather in order to complete the paper for the HAIGG on infection prevention and control workforce development and post graduate education papers. Discussion themes covered: need to review the present draft of the paper in the context of ‘matching demand against need’ ensuring that there is an appropriately trained and competent workforce assessment of infection prevention and control (IP&C) leadership among IP&C nurses and consideration around needs of nurses the need for engagement, participation and partnership with residential care, disability sector, long term care facilities IP&C settings in the context of the work HAIGG is doing on IP&C workforce development noting that the private surgical health sector is well represented for IP&C consideration to be given to including a representative from the residential care / long term care facilities IP&C sector on the HAIGG the limitations of the stocktake survey of current IP&C capabilities impact the usefulness of the survey results for use in preparing the paper. 2 Action Points: i. Ruth Barratt, Jane O’Malley and Chris McKenna to discuss and finalise the content of the draft paper in the context of ‘matching demand against need’ and development of IP&C leadership and needs of nurses. ii. The draft paper will need to be consulted with IP&C sector peers. iii. Don Mackie and Jane O’Malley will look into the question of whether to include representation from the residential care / long term care facilities IP&C sector on the HAIGG. The Ministry’s Clinical Leadership, Protection & Regulation Business Unit, and the Health Quality & Safety Commission will be approached as part of considering the question. d) Comment and Discussion on District Health Board IP&C Capabilities Noting that limitations of the stocktake survey of current IP&C capabilities impact the usefulness of the survey results for use in preparing the paper on IP&C workforce development, members discussed IP&C more generally. Points included: requesting information about resources directly from district health board IP&C managers would be a better approach than relying on the information from the stocktake survey seeking assurances from the district health boards over IP&C and response capabilities in the context of communicable disease threats and outbreak situations still vague needs a conversation between us at the meeting soon that the contingencies in primary care and community care settings around IP&C and response capabilities in the context of communicable disease threats and outbreak situations (how are these resourced) are still to be fully determined [mapped], including where public health services and medical officers of health roles fit. Agreed: That the Ministry of Health should write to the chief executives of the district health boards asking for: i. ii. iii. assurances around IP&C and plans that are in place for managing incidents once we know what we are seeking assurances on information on IP&C resources aren’t we asking the managers? information on laboratory diagnostic support and resources or approaches in the context of communicable disease threats and outbreak situations (e.g. norovirus, Clostridium difficile). Specific mention about the role of public health services needs to be included, in particular, about how well these services are connected to laboratories (both community and hospital) given that their work incurs costs for laboratories ( refer to Clostridium difficile decisions). 3 Action Point: i. e) The Ministry of Health to write to district health boards seeking assurances around IP&C and plans that are in place for managing incidents and requesting information in relation to IP&C resources. Guidelines for control of multidrug-resistant organisms in New Zealand Noted: that the action point (page 6), the Ministry of Health will hold an internal discussion about reviewing and updating of the guidelines, giving consideration to scope of review and possible mechanisms to carry out the review, and report back at the next meeting of the HAIGG, is pending. f) Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease An action point from the November 2012 meeting was: the Ministry of Health to explore coordination of a small ‘expert group’ that is able to be called upon at the time of a CJD incident to provide advice and leadership. Noted: the Ministry advised that it is not justifiable to establish a small ‘expert group’ considering the rarity of CJD incidents. The Ministry’s preferred approach for obtaining advice in relation to a CJD incident is to identify practitioners with the skill sets required and hold a teleconference. 4. Draft Discussion Paper on Management of Clostridium difficile Discussion Discussion covered the range of key issues yet to be addressed in terms of achieving consistent approaches to the diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile infections in hospital settings. Specific issues raised were: a standardised laboratory diagnostic testing approach needs to be agreed with the sector and this is also key to the surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection a change in current testing approaches will have a cost impact, in particular for the community/private laboratory setting a letter needs to be sent to clinical directors of diagnostic medical laboratories, clinical microbiologists, and chief medical officers regarding appropriate laboratory algorithms for testing for Clostridium difficile district health boards need to be informed accordingly on the cost impacts around the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile district health board contracts for community/private laboratory services in their regions need to be such that they enable community laboratories to undertake appropriate testing currently there is no incentive to test since the disease burden of Clostridium difficile infection is unknown 4 laboratory information systems (their ability and capacity to retrieve information) are critical elements for supporting surveillance surveillance requirements for Clostridium difficile are not solely laboratory results but also need to include appropriate denominator information to allow a standardised rate to be calculated, and clinical and other patient related information as part of the overall data package for this bacterium education at primary care level in relation to Clostridium difficile infection noted the successful workshop on Clostridium difficile held in February 2013. Agreed: Progressing forwards the following sequence of actions was agreed. i. ii. iii. iv. Testing: define the recommended diagnostic strategy for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection and prepare evidence around justifying the need for testing. Cost: identify the cost of the recommended testing approach. System readiness: identify potential barriers exist in relation to implementing a standardised testing approach throughout New Zealand. Surveillance: agreed that surveillance should be hospital-based to start with. Once hospital-based surveillance is successfully implemented consideration about extending surveillance to the community setting could be undertaken. In the interim there might be some research or information gathering undertaken in relation to cases of community onset Clostridium diffcile infection. Information from the above actions will inform the content of the letter to clinical directors of diagnostic medical laboratories, clinical microbiologists, and chief medical officers regarding testing for Clostridium difficile. Action Points i. ii. 5. The Ministry of Health to undertake internal work to attempt to identify costs around best practice approach to Clostridium difficile testing and evidence to support the justification for placing an emphasis on Clostridium difficile surveillance. Deborah Williamson to liaise with community laboratories to identify the amount (if any) of testing undertaken. Infection, Prevention & Control Measures to Control Clostridium difficile The feedback and comments about the draft one-pager on IP&C measures to control Clostridium difficle were discussed. The overall text and advice contained in the document was agreed. The draft one-pager guidance will be circulated to the IP&C professional sector and directors of nursing in district health boards for consultation. 5 Once finalised the guidance statement will be sent to directors of nursing in district health boards, IP&C teams, and also the private sector for their information to guide local policies in relation to IP&C measures to control Clostridium difficle. Action Point i. Ruth Barratt to send the draft to the IP&C professional sector the directors of nursing in district health boards for consultation. Ruth Barratt to present the ‘finalised guidance’ to HAIGG for sign-off. ii. 6. Antimicrobial Resistance New Zealand is not immune from the global issues that surround antimicrobial resistance. This item was put forward for discussion on our current situation and activities in combating antimicrobial resistance, and to inform where possible areas of activity around antimicrobial resistance are either lacking or could be improved. Discussion Officials from PHARMAC and the Ministry for Primary Industries took part in the discussion. Themes discussed included: approach to surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in New Zealand and major changes made in Australia to its approach to surveillance of antimicrobial resistance antibiotic stewardship and rational use of antimicrobials in patient care and animal husbandry. One-health concept mentioned. guidelines in relation to control of antimicrobial resistant organisms attitudes and behaviour change in relation to prescribing is required in certain quarters but achieving this has barriers, for example, currently there are no restrictions around veterinarian prescribing global travel and migration to New Zealand are major contributors to distribution of bacteria and their resistance genes. Action Point i. Deborah William to prepare a summary of the current antimicrobial resistance surveillance activities undertaken by ESR. The summary will include information on present knowledge gaps and areas lacking or needing improvement. Discussion with PHARMAC officials included: the range of data available through PHARMAC’s information system (for example, claims data, antibiotic usage, location of usage etc) interest in talking with ESR about possibility of matching claims data against antimicrobial resistance surveillance data 6 PHARMAC’s move to restrict prescribing of anti-infectives in the new Hospital Medicines List PHARMAC is about to write to clinicians confirming the anti-infectives section of the list. Officials indicated that it would be good to include a supportive statement from HAIGG on the policy change and the HAIGG agreed this would happen important that PHARMAC approaches are joined up with antibiotic protocols that operate in district health boards The Ministry of Health and PHARMAC will together work out messaging about PHARMAC’s policy change to restrict prescribing of anti-infectives. Use of patient stories noted as a helpful tool to use for messaging purposes. IP&C nurses were identified as an important group to message through as well. 7. PHARMAC Update Part of the PHARMAC update was covered as part of Item 6 (Antimicrobial Resistance), in particular, the policy change to restrict prescribing of antiinfectives in the new Hospital Medicines List (Section H). PHARMAC’s Anti-Infective Subcommittee has discussed the possibility of National Antimicrobial guidelines. The Ministry of Health attended the meeting as an invited ‘observer’. Discussion followed and points raised were: mechanisms for writing and updating guidelines and how guidelines are implemented across the sector were identified as issues clinical organisation policies and restrictions were suggested as more useful for enforcement purposes achieving agreement among the sector on guidelines can be very difficult culture change on antimicrobial use needs to be achieved. Overseas trained senior specialists were identified as a particular group where noncompliance with local policies is an issue best practice principals support clinical governance the Australian antibiotics guidelines developed by the Therapeutic Guidelines Group (www.tg.org.au) is currently developing version 15 of its antibiotic guideline and it was discussed whether these could be adopted for use in New Zealand Agreed The Ministry of Health will provide a letter of support for PHARMAC’s policy on restricting prescribing of anti-infectives in the new Hospital Medicines List. Action Point 7 i. 8. Don Mackie and Jane O’Malley to arrange for the New Zealand Formulary and the Health Quality and Safety Commission to be linked into PHARMAC’s policy implementation plans and where possible provide support for the change in policy. Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) Update The update to HAIGG covered: activities of the Agriculture Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Group in relation to review of sales of antibiotics used in animals veterinarians have no restrictions on prescribing mention that the process for registrations and approvals of non-human antimicrobials is prescriptive and takes into account World Health Organization recommendations the 2011 report on the 2009-2010 baseline survey of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from selected New Zealand food. It is coming up to five years since this survey was carried out. Whether a second survey should be carried out, and if so, whether that survey should assess the same pathogens are questions that MPI will need to decide. The use of antibiotics in aqua-farming, oral administration of antibiotics (as growth enhancers) in poultry, and veterinary prescribing were part of a more general discussion. Agreed That the knowledge gaps in relation to the Ministry of Primary Industries’ roles and functions with regard to antimicrobial agricultural compounds and antimicrobial resistance should be identified and listed. The list could then be given to the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) well prior to the next meeting of HAIGG with the invite to MPI to bring its relevant experts to the meeting for further discussion. 9. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) Support Unlike Australia, New Zealand does not have any support system that offers information and assistance for family members and friends of patients suffering with suspected CJD and other prion disease and for those at increased risk of developing CJD. The Ministry of Health tabled options on how best to provide support, information and assistance for family members and friends of patients suffering with suspected CJD and other prion disease and for those at increased risk of developing CJD. Members did not support any of the options around providing support. It was felt that the need for such support is very rare and information can be accessed via the Australian CJD Support website. 8 The Neurological Foundation of New Zealand was identified as worth approaching to inquire about support and information services for CJD. Action Point: i. The Ministry of Health will contact the Neurological Foundation of New Zealand to see whether it has any support and information services for CJD. 10. General Business National Plan for Managing Healthcare Associated infections A member noted that the HAIGG has spent considerable time in relation to developing advice around Clostridium difficile. The Co-chairs expressed concern that the HAIGG has among its role and purpose (refer to the Group’s Terms of Reference): (a) assist the Ministry of Health in developing and implementing a national plan that is adaptive and responsive for managing healthcare associated infections; (b) establish linkages across the sector and with other agencies; and (c) link with Emergency and Disaster planning where linkages are helpful without getting diverted from core objectives of the Terms of Reference. Members agreed that HAIGG needed to commence thinking about a national plan and also identify clearly ‘what agency is responsible for what’. It was suggested that the internal paper to the Director-General of Health (Healthcare Acquired Infections –February 2012) provides a basis for documenting a map of the various agencies and their responsibilities in relation to healthcare associated infections. Action Point For the next meeting the Ministry of Health will identify some information on overseas structural models for managing and responding to healthcare associated infections and present it at the next meeting for discussion. 11. Planned Next Meeting Date The date for the next meeting is to be advised. 12. Meeting Closure The meeting closed at 2pm. 9