LGA Name: _____________________________________________
Name of Assessor: ________________________ Date: _________
DFES Resource to Risk
Guide and Summary Sheets
Resource to Risk Summary
Guide to using the DFES R2R Process and Summary Sheets
The R2R Process should be conducted every three years (more often if significant changes occur) for each Local Government Authority. Ideally, this exercise should be scheduled so that it can be attended
by the LGA officer responsible for community emergency management coordination (CFM, CESM or similar), DFES District Manager and any other significant contributors. The R2R assessment is a useful
process for considering the strengths and opportunities that exist in and around a community, as well as revealing threats and weaknesses through risk assessment, analysis and treatments. The R2R
process is one where fair distribution and strategic placement of regional resources are considered as the primary consideration, with an emphasis on partnership and shared support among and between
communities. The DFES Superindendent will be responsible for making prioritised and evidence-based recommendations to the ESL Capital Grants Committee, based on the collective R2R assessments
across the region. The R2R is not intended to be a comprehensive catalogue of all resources or risks in an LGA. It is a process that develops a management plan for an identified risk that is currently
considered to be inadequately treated. The information generated by the process should provide a firm foundation for a request for resources to the ESL Grants Committee.
Stage 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Stage 2
Stage 3
Bushfire Risk and Coverage –Obtain and analyse the Bushfire Threat Analysis (BFTA) maps from Bush Fire & Environmental Protection, Research & Liaison. Print out the isochrone
maps for the area being analysed (maps available through DFES District Managers at http://extranet/sites/volunteers/members/GIS/Pages/TravelTimeMapping.aspx). To get a
complete picture, it may be necessary to also print out adjoining areas’ isochrone maps and confirm the accuracy of the locations of existing BFS appliances on the maps1. Identify
at-risk populated locations and/or critical infrastructure that appear to be lacking in adequate cover and note on Stage 1 sheet.
LGRC -Identify at-risk bushfire areas with vulnerable populations using the attached LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE CRITERIA (Table 2). Document briefly on the Stage 1 sheet.
Incident History -Map out and mark the number and extent of actual level 1 and level 2 bushfire incidents in the immediate vicinity attended or experienced in past 3 years and/or
5 years (if 5 years is significantly different from 3 year profile). Use Westplan –Bushfire to determine level and FIRS to supply latest data.
Brigade Profile(s)- Identify risks (if any) inherent in the local BFB Brigades. Consider training, available personnel, travel time, abilities/ages of volunteers.
Available Resources -List available resources, e.g. volunteers, appliances, tankers, low loaders and graders. etc. Identify whether there are additional resources available elsewhere
that may assist during high-risk periods. Document potential impact of each.
With the information provide by Stage 1, use Table 4 to identify risk levels for the communities and/or areas considered at- risk. If Risk Level is 6 or above, consider options for risk
reduction/treatment in Stage 3.
Prioritised Risk Areas Briefly state the nature of the risk and the area/population affected.
Risk Reduction/Controls Consider potential methods for risk reduction in general (fuel load management, education, resources available nearby, different appliance, etc.). Is there water
carrier capacity available in the vicinity? Consider DEC, private contractors, etc. Identify and document. Document methods considered, potential impact of each, ability of implementing
these controls and intent to employ each method. The person responsible for the implementation should be identified in the final column.
Potential Efficiencies Is there an opportunity or need to combine/collocate any units? Could swapping appliances with another area improve response abilities? Discuss and identify this,
including implications.
Stage 4
Review the high risk communities and/or areas identified in Stage 3. Document the new Level of Risk following the introduction of the strategies and processes identified in Stage 2 and
detailed on the Risk Treatment Schedule. If Risk Level remains at 6 or above, document controls and treatments for implementation and calculate new Level of Risk.
Stage 5





1
Identify additional resources required to provide minimum level of protection to the community in case of Level 1 incident and prioritise. If additional resources are outside the
ability of the LGA to source locally e.g. BA, Appliance, Building, then document on ESL Grant Request form. Consider appliance type most suitable to meet Level 1 fire response
criteria (see Table 1) and available trained personnel and infrastructure (has Breathing Apparatus, if identified, met criteria in Table 3)?
Ensure the attached R2R Summary identifies the at-risk population and geographical area and provides supporting information for alternative controls and treatments considered.
Attach BFS isochrone map(s) identifying the area concerned.
Identify consequence of not obtaining capital articles on ESL Grant Request form and describe what interim measures are/will be put in place to minimise risk.
Refer to Fit for Purpose assessments for identified building replacement priorities and include in ESL Grant Request form.
In some areas the data is missing or outdated. Please contact GIS in Perth to update this information, preferably with coordinates from a GPS device. The updated map should be available within 2 weeks.
Resource to Risk Summary
Scope: The assessment will address the risks to the local community of fires in areas outside gazetted fire districts and consider the possible impacts to
the people and infrastructure. Bushfires to be considered for treatment are Level 1 (although incident data on previous Level 2 and 3 bushfires should
be included).
Stage 1- Risk Assessment Process
Method
1.
2.
Bushfire Risk Areas that may have
inadequate cover to protect life and
property
(use BFTA maps and Travel Time
maps to assist with identification of
these locations)
Local Government Response Criteria
3.
Incident History
4.
Brigade Profile
5.
Available Resources
Notes
Resource to Risk Summary
Stage 2- Communities or areas with Risk Levels at 6 or more
Community/Area Name
Likelihood
1-5
Consequence
1-5
Level of Risk
(Likelihood x
Consequence)
Stage 3- Risk Controls and Treatment Schedule
Prioritised Risk Statements
Risk Controls/ Options
(e.g. Fuel reduction strategies, Strengthen volunteers capacity, Regional Water Tanker Capacity ,
Partnership formation, Potential Efficiencies)
1.
2.
3.
Impact (High/
Med/Low)
Feasibility
(high/
med/low)
Adopt?
(Y/N)
Responsible
Person/Position and
date(s) of
implementation
Resource to Risk Summary
Stage 4- Revised Risk Profiles with Proposed Controls and Treatments
Community/Area Name
Proposed Controls (not including major additional ESL resources)
Likelihood
1-5
Consequence
1-5
Level of Risk
(Likelihood x Consequence)
Local Government CEO: _____________________________
Signature: __________________________________
Date: ____________________________
DFES Superintendent: _______________________________
Signature: __________________________________
Date: ____________________________
Once completed, please forward a copy of this form to the DFES Planning & ESL Allocation Branch (retain a copy for your records).
Resource to Risk Summary
Tables
TABLE 1 - APPLIANCE TYPES
POPULATION CENTRE
Scattered
Settlement (up to 500
residents)
Rural Centre
or
Outer Urban
CHARACTERISTICS
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
APPLIANCE TYPES
Individual homes and out buildings
Situated between settlements or rural centres
Government Services at settlements and rural centres
COMMENTS
Rural Series
LT, R1.4, R2.4, R4.4
Broadacre
Little public infrastructure on properties
Bushfire risk
Larger Tanker Capacity should be considered in support of
settlements
Clusters of homes and buildings in central location
Basic infrastructure for day to day living
School/Store and supply facility
Bushfire risk
Large clusters of homes and buildings
Infrastructure in place for limited business support
Shopping sites, welfare facilities, school, medical service
Urban Series
2.4 U
3.4 U
Additional Light Tanker support for urban bushfire interaction to be
justified
Breathing Apparatus only as per assessment
Major roads and airfield, Light Industrial area
Bushfire risk, some complex structures
Table 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE CRITERIA
LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE CRITERIA
KEY= *Property under threat from bushfire # Turnout time to incident. + Aircraft and/or appropriate machinery where required
PASTORAL
RURAL / BROADACRE
SOUTH WEST AGRICULTURAL
or
CENTRAL WEST COASTAL
LOWER WEST COASTAL












Firefighting response for bushfire within 3 hours (200 + kms between services) +
Firefighting response on site for property threat within 3 hours*
Specialist Units (ICV) on site within 2 days
Up to two fire fighting appliances on site for bushfire in 1 hour (30 + kms between services)#
1 fire firefighting appliance on site for property threat in 1 hour
Specialist Units (ICV) on site within 6 hours
Up to 6 fire fighting appliances on site for bushfire in 30 minutes (20kms between services) #
1 fire fighting appliance on site for property threat in 30 minutes
Specialist Units (ICV) on site within 3 hours
Initial dispatch of 2 fire fighting appliances on site for bushfire in 20 minutes (10 kms between services).
1 fire fighting appliance on site for property threat in 20 minutes
Specialist Units (ICV) on site within 1 hour, Perth Outer Metropolitan within 45 minutes
Resource to Risk Summary
TABLE 3- BREATHING APPARATUS CHECKLISTS
BREATHING APPARATUS ALLOCATION CRITERIA (PLEASE TICK)
Appliance: Urban Series U2.4/3.4
Town Characteristics:
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Population - 700 or more;
More than 300 houses;
A hospital and/or some aged care facilities;
More than 5 public buildings;
Industrial area(s) with heavy industry capacity and more than 5 sites;
Fuel storage areas and or petrol stations;
5 or more sites storing hazardous chemicals;
One or more schools with at least 100 pupils;
A number of retail shops or outlets;
BREATHING APPARATUS PREREQUISITES (PLEASE TICK)
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Brigade and Local Government register agreement to provide service
Brigade has an appropriate urban appliance
Brigade has demonstrated a 24/7 roster with a minimum 4 person turn out
Station has appropriate BA maintenance and cleaning facilities
Brigade members willing to meet fitness requirements and facial hair management
Brigade members trained to fire-fighter (1-12)
Brigade members trained in hot fire
Brigade members trained in oxygen resuscitation techniques
Brigade members trained to Breathing Apparatus
*requires issuing of - level 2 PPE, BA, Oxy Viva
Office or other commercial developments; and
An airport, a port facility or large transport depot or facilities;
No breathing apparatus support within approximately 30 minutes on request
TABLE 4 - LIKELIHOOD AND CONSEQUENCES – (EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AUSTRALIA 2004)
LIKELIHOOD
Rare
Unlikely
Moderate
Likely
Almost Certain
1
2
3
4
5
Less than once in 15 years
At least once in 10 years
At least once in 3 years
At least once per year
More than once per year
CONSEQUENCE - HUMAN LIFE AND PROPERTY
1. Insignificant or of little significance
2. Minor – No fatalities. Small number of minor injuries. First aid treatment may be required. No people are displaced.
Little or no personal support required (support not monetary or material). Inconsequential or no damage
3. Moderate- Medical treatment required but no fatalities. Some hospitalisation. Localised displacement of people
who return within 24 hours. Personal support satisfied through local arrangements. Local damage, rectified by routine
arrangements. Community functioning with some inconvenience.
4. Major – Possible fatalities. Extensive injuries, significant hospitalisation. Large number displaced (more than 24
hours duration). Extensive resources required for personal support. Significant damage that requires external
resources. Community only partially functioning, some services unavailable.
5. Catastrophic – Significant fatalities. Large number of severe injuries. Extended and large number requiring
hospitalisation. General and widespread displacement for extended duration. Extensive damage. Extensive personal
support. Community unable to function without significant support.
Resource to Risk Summary
DOCUMENT HISTORY
AUTHOR
T Beswick
POSN
A/Resource
Allocation Officer
DATE
Dec 12
VERSION
1.0 of 2012
T Beswick
A/Resource
Allocation Officer
Mar 12
1.1 of 2013
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
 Replace FESA with DFES, Regional Director with Superindenent
 Changed to DFES logo

Changed signature from stakeholder to Local Government CEO &
Superintendent