Engineering Design - Science Inquiry Team Members ____________________________ _____________________________________________ Microscope Project _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Part I- Microscope Design Problem: Design something, using only the supplies listed below, that lets you see small objects more clearly. Constraints: Supplies: Two magnifying glasses Construction paper Clear tape Scissors Brainstorming- Design Sketches: (insert photos of your sketches here) Trial I****Which sketch will you try first? Why? How did your team decide? How effective was your design? Did you solve your problem? Is it possible that there is more than one way to solve the problem? If so, how else could this problem be solved? (insert sketches if available). Peer evaluation: Rank your classmate’s design Question How effective was the design? Did the team solve the problem? Did they show other ways to solve the problem? Did they try other ways to solve the problem? Yes/Very (explain why) No/Not so much (explain why) Trial II****Which sketch did you try this time? Why? How did your team decide? How effective was your design? Did you solve your problem? Was this design more or less effective than the first? Why? How? Peer evaluation: Rank your classmate’s design Question Yes (explain why) How effective was the design? Did the team solve the problem? Did they show other ways to solve the problem? Did they try other ways to solve the problem? Explain how your design works. What is the roll of each part? No (explain why) Part II- How Does It Work? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Have a team member hold up a sheet of newspaper so that it is at your eye level. Stand about 1 yard (1 m) away from the newspaper. Hold one magnifying lens in each hand. Move the lens in your left hand in front of your left eye. Close your right eye and look through the lens at the newspaper with your left eye. Observe the letters as seen through the single lens. Place the second lens directly in front the first lens. Describe the letters as seen through two lenses. 9. Slowly move the second lens away from your eye and toward the newspaper until a clear image is seen. 10. Describe the image seen through the separated lenses. 11. Continue to look at the newspaper while your teammate slowly moves the newspaper about 2 inches (5 cm) to the right. 12. Note the direction the paper appears to move when viewed through the lenses. What is happening? Could what you just discovered impact your design from Part I? How? Why? Trial III****Using the same supplies as in Part I, design something that will let you see small objects more clearly. How effective was your design? Did you solve your problem? Was this design more or less effective than those from Parts I and II? Why/Why not? How? Part III- Design Comparison Which of your designs (from Parts I, II, and III) was the most effective? Why? (Insert a figure of your most effective design below) Now, compare the design idea described below, to your own design. What are the similarities? What are the differences? 1. Wrap a stiff piece of paper such as a file folder around the outside edge of a magnifying lens. 2. Cut a slit in the paper for the handle of the lens. Secure the paper to the lens with masking tape, and then tape the sides of the paper together to form a tube. 3. Cut a small window out of the bottom edge of the tube beneath the handle to allow light to enter. 4. On the side opposite the handle, cut out a section that is just wide enough for the handle of a second magnifying lens to slip through and long enough for it to move up and down easily. 5. Place the second lens inside the tube so that the lens handle sticks out. 6. Stand the paper tube on the object being viewed. 7. Hold the upper handle to keep the model steady as you move the lower lens up and down to focus (produce a sharp, clear image). Now, build the design illustrated above. What do you notice about the images produced? Answer the question and sketch an example below (or sketch on a piece of paper and import the image). Part IV- Microscope Magnification Problem: Design a microscope with the greatest magnification possible. Constraints: Supplies: Two magnifying glasses Construction paper Clear tape Scissors Other lenses (possibly) Small, plastic ruler Brainstorming. How can you change your design to increase magnification? Is that possible? How are you going to quantify (measure with numbers) the strength of your microscope? Evidence: How strong is your microscope? Use photographs, measurements, and mathematical expressions to back up your claims. Peer Evaluation: Your design must be evaluated by another team. Show them your design sketches, actual model, photographs, and calculations. Does it all “add up”? Yes (explain why) Design sketches match the model Actual model is constructed Photographs are present Measurements are included Calculations are clear and accurate. No (explain why not) Final Report Paragraph one: What is the problem that you were trying to solve? Why is this an important problem to solve? Do some research. Give me some history. I want to know the key developments and the key players (people). List your sources below. Paragraph two: Reflect upon what you learned in part II. As well, take a look at the image in the reference section. Explain how a microscope works. What is the function of each part. You may list the functions using bullet points. However, the explanation needs to be in full sentences. You may need to do a bit of research. List your sources below. Paragraph three: How effective was each of your designs (you should have tried three)? Which worked the best? Why do you think this is so? Why did you change your designs? How is “the first microscope ever made” different from the microscopes that we use today? You will need to do some research to answer this question. List your sources below. Paragraph four: What was the greatest magnification that you were able to achieve with your design? How do you know that you achieved this magnification? (In other words, prove it.) To increase the magnification of your microscope, what would you have to do? What is the strongest (highest resolution) we can currently achieve with a microscope? How does this type of microscope work? What can we see with this type of microscope? Why would we want to see these things? You will need to do some research. List your sources below. Sources/References: VanCleave, Janice. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. “Doubles: How do objects look through a compound microscope?” http://www.education.com/science-fair/article/doubles/ Betsy, Dr. Tom and Keogh, Jim. 2005. Microbiology Demystified . McGraw-Hill Publishing http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://water.me.vccs.edu/courses/env108/clipart/MICROlabeled.gif&imgrefurl=http://water.me.vccs.edu/courses/env108/Lesson3_print.htm&h=441&w=472&s z=44&tbnid=IBLNc48P3MC_rM:&tbnh=118&tbnw=126&zoom=1&usg=__zHHQx0oWRXCMnxBsQdYKpK PE7v8=&docid=pCRDoe19l7qcQM&sa=X&ei=EWaaUv3rKI3ZoAS-rILIDg&ved=0CC0Q9QEwAA Microscope Engineering Design Science Inquiry Team Score Self Score Meets Standard (5 to 4) Part I All sections completed (with high effort) Part II All Most Far Below Standard (1 to 0) Some sections completed (or average to low effort in the section) Some Part III All Most Some Part IV All Most Some General Formatting -Appropriate page breaks -Appropriate file name Most items followed Some items followed Period_Microscope_Lastnames -Correct spelling and grammar -Concluding paragraph authors are clear -Project is in student’s science folder -Project is completed on time Approaching Standard (3 to 2) Most sections completed (w/ high to average effort) Teacher Score Individual Score Self Score Meets Standard (10 to 9) Paragraph # ________________ Paragraph # _______________ -It is clear which paragraph you wrote -Thoroughly answers all questions -Research conducted -Paragraph flows (has a topic sentence, supporting evidence, transitions) -It is clear which paragraph you wrote -Thoroughly answers all questions -Research conducted -Paragraph flows (has a topic sentence, supporting evidence, transitions) Approaching Standard (8 to 7) - More than one item from the “meets standard” column was not fully completed Far Below Standard (6 or below) -One or more items from the “meets standard” column are not fully completed AND/OR are missing. - More than one item from the “meets standard” column was not fully completed -One or more items from the “meets standard” column are not fully completed AND/OR are missing. Teacher Score