Rubric for Team-Led Activity on Adult Learning Theory
Team Name and Members:
Theories Presented:
Theories
Theorists
Comparison
Resources
Presentation
Assessment
Reviewer Name:
Feedback:
Exemplary
3
Evidence of in-depth understanding of
the theory assigned. Demonstrated
understanding of how the theory
applies to teaching in the health
professions through explanation,
modeling, and examples.
Evidence of in-depth understanding of
major theorists with detailed
information clearly provided and
explained.
Fully-demonstrated understanding of
strength and weaknesses of the
theory compared and contrasted with
other theories studied.
Detailed resource/handout(s)
designed appropriately for the (class)
audience that contains in-depth
information to explain and support the
theory with references and examples.
Clear, organized and without errors.
Engaging activity that involves all
learners. All team members are wellprepared. The team appears
cohesive, with each team member
having a clear role in participation or
facilitation of the activity.
Assessment addresses objectives
Proficient
2
Evidence of understanding of the
theories assigned. Demonstrated
understanding of how the theory
applies to teaching adults through at
least two methods: explanation,
modeling, or examples.
Evidence of understanding of at least
one major theorist with some
information about the theorist
provided and explained.
Evidence of understanding of
strength and weaknesses of the
theory with some or little distinctions
noted between theories.
Resource/handout(s) designed
appropriately for the (class) audience
that contains some information to
support the theory. Clarity or
organization could be improved.
Emerging
1
Little evidence of understanding of
the theories assigned. Demonstrated
understanding of how theories apply
to teaching adults through at least
one method: explanation, modeling,
or examples.
Evidence of narrow understanding
major theorists with minimal or no
information provided or explained.
Evidence of attempts to involve
learners in some way. Team
members are prepared and each has
a role in the activity.
Presentation does not involve
learners. Team is unprepared with
team members playing unequal roles
in activity. One or more team
members do not participate.
Assessment does not adequately
address objectives
None or does not address objectives
Evidence of some understanding of
strength and weaknesses of the
theory. Compare and contrast
element missing, minimal, or unclear.
No resource/handout included or one
that contains minimal information.
Issues with clarity, organization or
grammar/spelling.
Score and
Comments