EUROPEAN GROUP FOR THE STUDY OF DEVIANCE AND SOCIAL CONTROL ESTABLISHED 1973 Coordinator: Emma Bell Secretary: Monish Bhatia In the recent refugee protests in Israel, individuals marched with signs showing their seven-digit identification number assigned by the immigration authorities. They used these numbers to recall Holocaust tattoos, and depict the dehumanising nature of the immigration system. WINTER NEWSLETTER I Website Administrator: Kirsty Ellis TABLE OF CONTENTS I. European Group 42nd Conference Call for Papers CONFIRMED SPEAKERS CONFERENCE FEES ASSISTED PLACES II. Comment and Analysis Spanish Penalfare: A Scary Story Dani Jiménez & Ale Forero III. European Group News Resolution Recent publications by Group Members European Group Anthology British/Irish Section Conference Call for Papers (Newsletter) IV. News from Europe and around the World Australia Argentina Colombia Israel Greece UK USA WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION I. European Group Conference Resisting the Demonisation of ‘the Other’: State, Nationalism and Social Control in a Time of Crisis 42nd Annual Conference of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control 3rd - 6th September, 2014 Liverpool United Kingdom CALL FOR PAPERS Six years into the financial crisis that began to unfold in 2008, we have witnessed a renewed politics of ‘the Other’. Processes of exclusion have intensified due to the onslaught of ruthless welfare reforms, mass unemployment and enforced poverty. The increasing evidence of hostility towards people considered as ‘the Other’ is further evidenced by the mobilisation of the far right across Europe. Meanwhile, activists and anti-capitalists are increasingly targeted for criminalisation and placed under surveillance. Systems of social control – including both formal mechanisms such as policing and prisons and informal mechanisms, such as those organised by voluntary organisations – are in a period of perpetual crisis: as punitive responses intensify, the poor and the unemployed are responsibilised for their own poverty. Anti-immigration policies, housing repossessions, and forced debt repayment have revealed new forms of state violence and have intensified processes of othering and exclusion. At the same time, the crisis has strengthened institutional practices widening class, gender, age and racialised inequalities whilst the impunity of powerful elites is sustained. This conference calls for papers exploring the demonisation of ‘the Other’ in our time of economic, political and social crises. How can we most effectively challenge the growing reach of social control apparatus and the rise of right wing extremism in Europe and beyond? What are the factors contributing to growing social and economic inequalities and their collateral consequences? How can we best promote principles of social justice, tolerance and social inclusion in times of crisis? How can academics most effectively make connections with grass roots resistance movements? What alternative values, principles and policies should be promoted? We particularly welcome papers focussing upon 'race', especially regarding the intersections between racism, sexism, classism and national identity and papers exploring the relationship between imperialism, sovereignty and processes of Othering. We are also keen to invite activist groups and social movements to present and participate in this conference. We welcome papers on the themes below which reflect the general values and principles of the European Group. WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION Processes of Othering Contact: Vicky Canning Email: V.Canning@ljmu.ac.uk Social control in a time of crisis Contact: Vickie Cooper Email: V.F.Cooper@ljmu.ac.uk Sovereignty, imperialism, nationalism and racism Contact: Giles Barrett Email: G.A.Barrett@ljmu.ac.uk The harms of neoliberal capitalism Contact: David Scott Email: D.G.Scott@ljmu.ac.uk Exclusion, marginalisation and criminalisation Contact: Helen Monk Email: H.L.Monk@ljmu.ac.uk Resistance and radical alternatives Contact: Jim Hollinshead Email: J.M.Hollinshead@ljmu.ac.uk Fortress Europe and the reinforcement of immigration controls The persecution and exclusion of minority groups The rise of the far right in Europe and beyond Immigration and the ‘war on terror’ The ‘other’ in divided societies Welfare and social control Policing and the crisis Prisons in the age of austerity Surveillance technologies and CCTV Decarceration and abolitionist critiques Futures of social control Volunteers and the managerial state Racism and the State The return of imperialism The meaning of sovereignty Explorations of the neo-colonial / post-colonial condition Sectarianism The different manifestations of nationalism (from racism to welfare nationalism) The social and environmental consequences of capitalism and consumerism The harms of the powerful State violence The responsibilisation of the powerless The demonisation and punishment of children and young people The criminalisation of poverty Gendered critiques of the application of criminal law and criminal /social policy Gendered violence Violence against women Identity, diversity and criminalisation The regulation of ‘sexuality’ Moving beyond criminology towards a social harm approach to deviance Radical alternatives and struggles for social justice Universities and local activism The othering of radical activism Resistance and the view from below WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION Further information on the 42nd annual conference may be found at http://www.europeangroup.org. Please submit all abstracts by 30 April 2014 to the email contact provided under the stream you wish to present at. For all general enquiries please contact Anne Hayes at EGC2014@ljmu.ac.uk. Confirmed speakers: Paul Gilroy, Jo Phoenix, Joe Sim Costs: £ €* Full delegate fee including 4 nights’ accommodation and conference 340 412 dinner Full delegate fee including 3 nights’ accommodation and conference 290 350 dinner Full delegate fee including conference dinner 145 175 Full delegate fee 105 127 Unwaged fee 35 42 *€ prices are quoted at time of publication. These are subject to change according to fluctuating exchange rates A link to the website for booking will be published here soon. Assisted Places Please note that there will be at least one assisted place available for the conference. Depending on the nature of applications, we would be looking to bestow the assisted place on one person who meets some / all of the below criteria: * Does not have a tenured position in academia or has no means of providing alternative means of support through employment schemes. * An MA / PhD student / part-time member of staff who is ineligible for university department/school/faculty funding to attend conferences. * Is confronted with other significant difficulties which would merit special support to attend the conference. * Is currently undertaking research or activism in an area that reflects the themes and values of the European Group The deadline for applications is 1st April 2014. Those wishing to apply should write a 150300 word statement in support of their application. A copy of the conference paper abstract should also be included in the submission. Please address applications to both Vicky Cooper (conference organiser) V.F.Cooper@ljmu.ac.uk and Emma Bell europeangroupcoordinator@gmail.com The conference place is free and the European Group will help support travel and accommodation up to €250 for the assisted place. WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION II. Comment and analysis Spanish Penalfare: A Scary Story Dani Jiménez & Ale Forero. Zaragoza - Barcelona* *In anticipation of the 42nd Annual Conference of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control A certain level of criminality, said M. Foucault. A necessary redefinition of the cycle punishment-crime-punishment, we might say nowadays. Facing the sovereign question in criminological terms means focusing on real state-corporate crimes. To problematise the analysis of governmentality, we must focus on how common offences are selected and punishment is reproduced at a systemic level – far beyond penal institutions. The new sovereign scenario shows an expanded production of punishment under the paradigm of expulsion as the new political nomos. From Agamben’s concentration camp to a sort of internal refugee camp, the debtocratic – ‘made in Greece’ term – self-government and its new raison d’état refocus repression towards those anomalous spaces in which precarious and indebted classes – those who are not poor for now – look for a way to resist de-politisation or, at least, to fight the increasing level of dispossession. Time goes by quickly when governmental, formal control agencies change their methods and positions as a consequence of hard changes in the social structures of senile capitalism. Productive imprisonment v. fiscal restrictions, once said G. Rusche and O. Kirchheimer. Unproductive accumulation, growing unemployment, de-capitalization and necessary modulation of the punitive methods, we should add nowadays. Under neoliberalism, the link production-employment-prison is not being expressed in the same classic terms anymore. This doesn’t undermine the discourse of the political economy of punishment but rather confirms its utility in a new context of productive relationships and a different accumulation pattern. As induced crisis and debtocracy take root as the two pillars of a new regime, an extended logic of expulsion and abandonment becomes even more prevalent than the phenomenon of hyper-incarceration. Repressive ‘alternatives’ to prison seem to replace imprisonment, taking the ‘pole position’ of security policies. This is what the new reforms of the Spanish criminal law clearly express: the Markets propose and impose; the State provides and takes up arms against its vassals. The vassals cry their nostalgia for a vague idea of citizenship. Spain, 2013. The golden rule of accumulation and its inseparable reverse side – dispossession – engenders some technocratic monsters that propose rational solutions to the economic crisis and the social disorder for which they themselves are to be blamed. To this day, the open question is if any neoliberal Leviathan is able to implement these solutions whilst continuing to guarantee the above inviolable rule. The unknown is how high can the level of imbalance be between state-corporate crime and selective criminalisation in a statu quo of social peace, understood as the unfair but sustainable situation in which the explicit means of the state of exception are still not required. For decades, the Spanish bond between market, state and punishment has been presided over by a massive criminal bubble, partially inflated by a rising tension: on one hand, the massive production of unpunished state-corporate crimes; on the other hand, a hyper-criminalisation of the underclasses and a selective penal inflation. The close relationship between obedience and support once attributed to the world of politics by H. Arendt has been efficiently shown during three decades of majoritarian democracy in WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION the post-fascist Kingdom of Spain. The fight for absolute majority, the unstoppable ideological assimilation of electoral speeches and a trend towards legislating by decree are three of its defining elements. A bipartisan regime, reluctant to engage in public policy deliberation, focused on a dynamics of competition, prone to govern through crime, to make war on terrorism or on immigration via the penal system, is established on the sovereignty of a fictional consensus. This challenges social cohesion by obsessively invoking the empty mantra of ‘stability’ against the rule of law, exchanging citizen security for social security, imposing penal justice over social justice and applying extreme measures which undermine human rights. Local realities and criminal justice trends in the current context of Spanish neoliberalism are clearly expressed in what we define as punitive schizophrenia. The latest reform of the Penal Code, which is being discussed at present, seeks to establish the conditions for a reduction of the prison subsystem whilst reinforcing the entire criminal system. Most of the latest changes are being applied in an administrative regulatory framework, for instance, expelling migrants as an alternative to punishment. Some measures of ‘punitive austerity’ such as the extension of probation actually involve more controls out of prison and more possibilities of re-entry. That same reform turns a nut towards exceptionalism through measures such as the ‘permanent reviewable penalty’ – not only a clear euphemism for actual imprisonment but also a mere contradiction in terms. Although its proponents have defended the prison as ‘humane’ under the pretext that inmates ‘have a horizon of freedom’ [sic], this new penalty comes at a time when the European Court of Human Rights deals a blow to the infamous Parot Doctrine1: the State is obliged to restore freedom to more than 50 people who had been imprisoned arbitrarily. However, the Strasbourg Doctrine does not eliminate any other penal exceptional structures of the Kingdom: it doesn't abolish penalties of up to 40 years; nor does it abolish the prisoner dispersal policy that scatters them across Spain and far from home; nor does it challenge the macro-processes, the isolation regime, incommunicado detention, abuses, torture.... in short, it doesn’t challenge any other structure assembled from criminal emergency. The fall of the Parot Doctrine is in reality a calculated loss. The Spanish government(s) have not only managed to keep dozens of people in prison for years illegally but also to spread the images of ‘happy and victorious ETA terrorists coming out of prison’, reinforcing punitive populism and undertaking the reform of the Penal Code with a higher level of legitimacy. Perhaps for this reason, along with some reforms to criminalise dissent, namely the prohibition on ‘occupying’ bank offices, the criminalisation of ‘calling for’ demonstrations that might result in riots, etc., the next stage of the law is being focused on the reform of the Public Safety Act which ‘complements’ penal repression with administrative and explicitly economic repression. The right to demonstrate and any other expression of popular discontent are being restricted. It will be possible to fine a person for protesting in front of the Parliament building or for participating in an escrache by a politician’s residence. These expressions, as it is said by the politicians, need to be fought against despite the reticence of the courts to treat them as punishable. Such policies are similar to those adopted in other southern European countries such as Italy where governors claim they aim to strengthen 1 Established through Supreme Court Judgement No. 197/2006 on the issue of parole in cases of terrorist offences, the Parot Doctrine means that prisoners convicted by the old Penal Law can be illegally held in prison after they should be released because the subsequent penal reforms made this Law much harsher. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 42750/09, Del Río Prada v. Spain) found the Spanish State guilty of violating the articles 5.1 and 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights –see http://www.icab.es/files/242-410775-DOCUMENTO/177723277-Case-of-Del-Rio-Prada-v-Spain.pdf. WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION democracy yet in reality are simply controlling the governed by reducing the power of judges. All these measures take another step towards the authoritarian defence of a less and less legitimated power. While seeking to invent new offenses and increase penalties for the dispossessed, they look the other way when corruption scandals and other white collar crimes multiply. The current crisis and its criminal management are one more chapter in the transition from ‘governing through crime’ to governing from crime. Author biography Dani Jiménez is researcher in the LSJ (Sociology of Law Laboratory) and doctoral candidate in the Sociology of Law from the University of Zaragoza. Ale Forero is researcher in the OSPDH (Observatory of the Penal System and Human Rights) at the University of Barcelona. WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION III. European Group News Resolution The European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control opposes the latest amendment to the Israeli government’s ‘Law to Prevent Infiltration’ The European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control, the largest worldwide network of scholars and activists working for social justice, state accountability and decarceration, expresses its profound concern about the latest amendment to the ‘Law to Prevent Infiltration’ passed by the Israeli Parliament in December 2013. The amendment, which allows the detention of migrants illegally entering the country without trial for up to one year, entails the suspension of habeas corpus and, as such, is unconstitutional. The European Group would like to remind the Israeli government of its responsibilities as a signatory to the United Nations Refugees Convention of 1951 to provide refuge for individuals fleeing countries deemed unsafe. We support the peaceful protests by refugees and University of Tel Aviv students, who are demanding that refugee rights be respected. We strongly oppose racist violence against refugees in Israel and urge the government to take action against the perpetrators of such violence and to protect these vulnerable victims. Furthermore, we condemn all penal responses to migration and stress that the human dignity of asylum seekers must be placed before all political considerations. WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION Recent publications by European Group members The Group would like to encourage members to send references for their new publications to the Group coordinator. These will be published in the newsletter and then will appear on the website. The aim is to build up a directory of members’ work over the coming years. Please send in your references in Harvard format by the 25th of each month to europeangroupcoordinator@gmail.com if you wish to see them appear in the following month’s newsletter. Fleury-Steiner, Benjamin and Longazel, Jamie G. (2013) The Pains of Mass Imprisonment, Taylor & Francis. Moore, Linda and Scraton, Phil (2013) The Incarceration of Women: Punishing Bodies, Breaking Spirits, Palgrave. European Group Anthology Some copies of the European Group anthology, Critique and Dissent, are still available to order. Please address UK orders in £sterling to John Moore (J.Moore@uwe.ac.uk). Please send a cheque for £22 (incl. P&P) directly payable to John Moore at 17 Atlantic Road, Westonsuper-Mare, BS23 2DG. For orders within the Eurozone, please contact Emma Bell (europeangroupcoordinator@gmail.com) who will send you out the Group's bank details so you can make payment (29€ incl.P&P). When ordering please make clear what address you want the anthology delivered to. For all other orders, please order directly from Red Quill. See http://www.redquillbooks.com/Critique_and_Dissent.html WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION Call for papers We’d like to encourage academics, activists and those targetted by mechanisms of state control (people in prison, migrants, people who have come into conflict with the police etc.) to contribute short pieces of approximately 1,500 words to our monthly newsletter ‘comment and analysis’ section. Contributions from across the globe are welcome. Please contact Emma Bell at europeangroupcoordinator@gmail.com British/Irish Conference ‘Penal Law, Abolitionism and Anarchism’, a conference hosted by the British/Irish section of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control and the Hulsman Foundation will take place from Saturday 26th – Sunday 27th April 2014 at Shire Hall, Nottingham. Can we imagine law without the state? Could what we now call ‘crime’ be dealt with by means other than criminal law and punishment? This conference seeks to explore interrelationships and tensions that exist between the philosophies and practices associated with penal law, abolitionism and anarchism. It aims to provide a space for the interdisciplinary exploration of complex critiques of state law and legality, criminalization and other forms of state and corporate power in neoliberal contexts. The rich and complex European tradition of abolition recently explored in great detail by Vincenzo Ruggiero, to which Louk Hulsman made such a creative contribution, provides important intellectual resources to challenge neoliberal penal and social [well/war –fare] politics and policies and to expose their harms and underlying power-dynamics. Joe Sim underlined the continued importance of Angela Davis’ concept of ‘abolitionist alternatives’ as well as of forms of a renewed penal activism. These and other abolitionist or minimalist approaches to criminal justice challenge existing hegemonic belief systems that continue to legitimate the generation of harms via the operations of law, psychology, criminology, the media and frequently shape public opinion. For some critical criminologists such reflections might imply promoting an Anarchist Criminology, while for others this might involve the use of courts to challenge decisions made by ministers. The direct action taken by the Occupy movement and similar movements (e.g. UK Uncut) can of course also be linked to a diversity of philosophies and principles of anarchism as well as to contemporary media movements and digital activism that are of crucial relevance in the current context. For further details please contact Andrea Beckmann [abeckmann@lincoln.ac.uk] or Tony Ward [A.Ward@hull.ac.uk] WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION IV. News from Europe and the World Australia Some disturbing pictures of conditions at the Australian asylum detention centre on the Pacific island of Nauru available here: http://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2013/dec/06/nauru-gallery Guardian report on the realities of life in the Australian immigration detention centre on Manus Island: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/07/manus-island-key-pointsfrom-asylum-seeker-incidents-investigation Gay asylum seekers detained in Australian detention centres in Papua New Guinea told they could be reported to local police, Amnesty says. See http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/11/gay-asylum-seekers-told-they-could-bereported-to-png-police-amnesty-says Argentina Message from Mauro Testa: I’m part of a research group about the punitive power "poder punitivo" and youth. I saw the website of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control and it’s very very interesting! You can visit our site: http://jovenesypoderpunitivo.org (it’s in Spanish language) In 2013 we organized a seminar called "Youth and social control", aimed particularly at workers of the institutions that constitute the "punitive chain" (cadena punitiva): police, jail and courts...almost 100 people participated in this course (including students and researchers). For this year, we want to organize another seminar about social control and we want to know if it is possible to invite someone of your group to talk about social control in Europe and some theoretical issues about it... We don`t have our own funding resources but if we talk with time, maybe we can access to some public or private financing. If you are interested, please contact: testa.mauro@gmail.com Colombia The citizens of Bogotá, Colombia, are asking for solidarity from the international community. The leftist mayor of Bogotá was banned from office through an anti-democratic and illegal decision. Bogota's mayor, Gustavo Petro, is a former combatant from the M-19 guerrilla. He has been struggling against speciesism, anthropocentrism and inequality. Some of his main changes were to cancel bullfighting in Bogotá, to forbid the use of horses as means of carrying big loads through the city (replacing them with cars); taking away the "recycling business” from private corporations and handing it over to poor people. Many of his actions were seen as attacks against Colombian oligarchy. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/worldlatin-america-25310963 Israel The European Group recently passed a resolution condemning the latest amendment to the ‘Law to Prevent Infiltration’ passed by the Israeli Parliament in December 2013 which allows the detention of migrants illegally entering the country without trial for up to one year (for more info, see http://www.acri.org.il/en/2013/12/16/new-petition-anti-infil/). It also WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION condemned the racist violence perpetrated against African refugees (for more info, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA). Council of Europe report on the state of human http://www.statewatch.org/news/2013/dec/coe-austerity-hr-report.pdf rights in Israel: Greece The rise of the right-wing extremism in Greece has now attracted attention from George Soros. See: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/greece-what-lies-ahead United Kingdom Past Event A new module entitled ‘Crime, Harm and Victimisation’ is running for the first year on the Criminology Programme at the University of Chester. Taking a zemiological approach, the module looks at crimes, harms and victimization commissioned by the powerful, including trusted perpetrators. These include trusted industries, organisations and institutions such as the professional wrestling industry, organized religions, the financial sector, and the Police. We were very pleased that Sheila Coleman, spokesperson for the Hillsborough Justice Campaign and co-author of No Last Rights, was able to contribute to the module. This was a real privilege and one that we envisage will be repeated in future years. Sheila discussed the Hillsborough disaster and its subsequent aftermath. In keeping with the module, she discussed the significance of the resistance and resilience of the bereaved and the survivors of Hillsborough, some of whom have died during this long drawn out campaign for truth and justice. Issues that were addressed by Sheila were the tensions of care and control in response to the immediate disaster and the initial and continued denial of victimhood and victim blaming by the media and state actors. Sheila also powerfully conveyed the significance of the 3:15 pm cut off and the damning findings of the Hillsborough Independent Panel. Finally students were provided with an update of where the Hillsborough families and survivors campaign for truth and justice was currently up to and envisaged future directions. Students engaged in a sensitive question and answer session and some insightful questions were asked. This was especially the case regarding the role of the Independent Police Complaints Commission. Sheila spent some time with a small group of students who found it hard to believe the various levels of abuse of power. I am sure it will be one of the more memorable sessions that will stay with students during their post-university life. Dr Karen Corteen Relevant sources: Scraton, P., Jemphrey, A., Coleman, S. (1995). No Last Rights: The Denial of Justice and the Promotion of Myth in the Aftermath of the Hillsborough Disaster. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool City Council. Hillsborough Justice Campaign Website: http://www.contrast.org/hillsborough/ Hillsborough Family Support Group Website: http://hfsg.co.uk Hillsborough Independent Panel Website: http://hillsborough.independent.gov.uk WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION Events The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies and the University of Liverpool will behosting a conference entitled ’How violent is Britain?’ on Friday 16th May 201’. For more details, see http://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/civicrm/event/info?reset=1&id=35 Aimilia Voulvouli and Dr Raul Gerardo Acosta Garcia, a Mexican fellow anthropologist currently working at ITESO, are organizing a panel for the upcoming Royal Anthropological Institute Conference on Anthropology and Photography to be held in London Next May (29th – 31st) at the British Museum. You are more than welcome to apply to our panel entitled “Visibility of dissent: meanings and repercussions of urban activism through digital photography and video” (http://www.nomadit.co.uk/rai/events/rai2014/panels.php5?PanelID=2827) or any of the other panels of the conference. British Society of Criminology Conference, Hosted by the Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, School of Law and Social Justice, The University of Liverpool. 1012 July (preceded by a postgraduate conference on 9 July). For further details see: http://www.liv.ac.uk/law-and-social-justice/conferences/bsc/ Reports New report from Medical Justice on Mental Health in Immigration Detention: http://www.medicaljustice.org.uk/reports-a-intelligence/other-organisations-reports/aboutdetainee-health/2251-mental-health-in-immigration-detention-action-group-initial-report-1712-13.html Bordering on Criminal: The Routine Abuse of Migrants in the Removal System: This threepart series highlights the findings of the Migrant Border Crossing Study—a binational, multiinstitution study of 1,110 randomly selected, recently repatriated migrants surveyed in six Mexican cities between 2009 and 2012. The study exposes widespread mistreatment of migrants at the hands of U.S. officials in the removal system. See: http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/special-reports/bordering-criminal-routine-abusemigrants-removal-system Petitions Urgent campaign from No Borders Leeds, for bisexual man facing deportation to Jamaica. Sign the petition, lobby BA to stop the flight, join the protest at Leeds UKBA centre: http://ncadc.org.uk/right-to-remain/orashia-must-stay/ USA Call for Papers Journal of the Latino Research Center at the University of Nevada, Reno Border-Lines is an interdisciplinary academic journal dedicated to the dissemination of research on Chicana/o— Latina/o cultural, political, and social issues. The publication is a peer-reviewed academic journal that seeks to publish scholarly articles in interdisciplinary fields such as Anthropology, Education, Geography, History, Human Health, Literary and Cultural Studies, Political Science, Social Work, and Sociology, as well as creative writing pieces by Latino writers such as essays, short stories, and poems. WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION Submissions are invited for the new volume of Border-Lines. The topic is open. Submission Guidelines • Manuscripts submitted to Border-Lines should be the original and unpublished research that is not under consideration for any other journal at the time. • Manuscripts should include an abstract of 150 words or less. • Manuscripts are accepted in English or Spanish; 4,000-6,000 words, plus bibliography. • Manuscripts should be submitted in Microsoft Word, double spaced in 12 point type, Times New Roman, Chicago Style Manual. • Graphs and images must be submitted as independent files in .EPS or .TIFF format. • Creative writing pieces are invited for review in English or Spanish. Essays and short stories should not exceed 1,000 words; poems may also be submitted for review and possible publication. • Book reviews on publications related to Chicana/o—Latina/o cultural, political, and social issues will be considered for publication and should not exceed 1,500 in length. • Deadline for Submission: January 24, 2014. Send submissions (on PC/Mac compatible CD or by electronic attachment) to BorderLines@unr.edu A BIG THANKS to all the European Group members for making this newsletter successful.. Please feel free to contribute to this newsletter by sending any information that you think might be of interest to the Group to Emma/Monish at : europeangroupcoordinator@gmail.com Please try to send it in before the 25th of each month if you wish to have it included in the following month’s newsletter. Please provide a web link (wherever possible). WORKING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, STATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND DECARCERATION