GRADES 6-11 Simplified PARCC SCORING RUBRIC FOR PROSE CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE ITEMS (Revised July 29, 2014)*** Research Simulation Task and Literary Analysis Task Construct Measured Score Point 4 Score Point 3 Score Point 2 Score Point 1 Score Point 0 COMPREHENSION/ ANALYSIS/EVIDENCE: COMPREHENSION/ ANALYSIS/EVIDENCE: COMPREHENSION/ ANALYSIS/EVIDENCE: COMPREHENSION/ ANALYSIS/EVIDENCE: COMPREHENSION/ ANALYSIS/EVIDENCE: Reading/ Comprehension of Key Ideas and Details Full comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and inferentially Accurate analysis Effective and convincing textual evidence DEVELOPMENT/ REASONING/ EVIDENCE: Mostly effective development of the claim or topic Clear reasoning Relevant textual evidence COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Purposeful coherence, clarity, and cohesion Easy to follow COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Coherent, clear, and cohesive Fairly easy to follow STYLE: Effective style STYLE: Mostly effective style while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: Writing/ Knowledge of Language and Conventions (scored out of 3) DEVELOPMENT/ REASONING/ EVIDENCE: Effective and comprehensive development of the claim or topic Clear and convincing reasoning Relevant textual evidence Writing/ Written Expression Comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and/or inferentially Mostly accurate analysis Adequate textual evidence Full command of the conventions of standard English MECHANICS/ CLARITY: Few minor errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage Meaning is clear. Basic comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and/or inferentially Generally accurate analysis Basic textual evidence Limited comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and/or inferentially Minimally accurate analysis Limited textual evidence DEVELOPMENT/ DEVELOPMENT/ REASONING/ EVIDENCE: REASONING/ EVIDENCE: Some development of Minimal development the claim or topic Limited reasoning and text-based evidence; Some reasoning and text-based evidence OR: is developed but does not address the prompt COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Some coherence, clarity, and/or cohesion Progression of ideas usually discernible but not obvious COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Limited coherence, clarity, and/or cohesion Somewhat unclear No comprehension of ideas Inaccurate or no analysis Little to no textual evidence DEVELOPMENT/ REASONING/ EVIDENCE: Undeveloped COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Lacking coherence, clarity, and cohesion STYLE: STYLE: STYLE: Inappropriate style, with Somewhat effective, Limited effectiveness, with little to no awareness of generally attending to the limited awareness of the the norms of the discipline. norms and conventions of norms of the discipline. the discipline. COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: Some command of the conventions of standard English MECHANICS/ CLARITY: May have errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage that occasionally impede understanding Meaning is generally clear. COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: Limited command of the conventions of standard English No command of the conventions of standard English MECHANICS/ CLARITY: MECHANICS/ CLARITY: Errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage often impede understanding. Frequent and varied errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage impede understanding. GRADES 6-11 Simplified PARCC SCORING RUBRIC FOR PROSE CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE ITEMS (Revised July 29, 2014)*** Narrative Task Construct Measured Writing/ Written Expression Score Point 4 Score Point 3 Score Point 2 Score Point 1 Score Point 0 DEVELOPMENT & USE OF NARRATIVE ELEMENTS: Effectively developed with narrative elements DEVELOPMENT & USE OF NARRATIVE ELEMENTS: Mostly effectively developed with narrative elements DEVELOPMENT & USE OF NARRATIVE ELEMENTS: Developed with some narrative elements DEVELOPMENT & USE OF NARRATIVE ELEMENTS: Minimally developed with few narrative elements DEVELOPMENT & USE OF NARRATIVE ELEMENTS: Undeveloped COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Lacking coherence, clarity, and cohesion COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Purposeful coherence, clarity, and cohesion Easy to follow COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Coherent, clear, and cohesive Fairly easy to follow COHERENCE/ CLARITY: COHERENCE/ CLARITY: Some coherence, Limited coherence, clarity, and/or cohesion clarity, and/or cohesion Progression of ideas Somewhat unclear usually discernible but not obvious STYLE: Effective style STYLE: Mostly effective style while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. STYLE: STYLE: STYLE: Inappropriate style, with Somewhat effective, Limited effectiveness, little to no awareness generally attending to the with limited awareness of of the norms of the norms and conventions of the norms of the discipline. discipline. the discipline. COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: Writing/ Knowledge of Language and Conventions Full command of the conventions of standard English MECHANICS/ CLARITY: Few minor errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage Meaning is clear. COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: Some command of the conventions of standard English MECHANICS/ CLARITY: May have errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage that occasionally impede understanding Meaning is generally clear. Limited command of the conventions of standard English COMMAND OF CONVENTIONS: No command of the conventions of standard English MECHANICS/ CLARITY: MECHANICS/ CLARITY: Errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage often impede understanding. Frequent and varied errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage impede understanding. NOTE: The reading dimension is not scored for elicited narrative stories. The elements of coherence, clarity, and cohesion to be assessed are expressed in the grade-level standards 1-4 for writing. Tone is not assessed in grade 6. Per the CCSS, narrative elements in grades 3-5 may include: establishing a situation, organizing a logical event sequence, describing scenes, objects or people, developing characters personalities, and using dialogue as appropriate. In grades 6-8, narrative elements may include, in addition to the grades 3-5 elements, establishing a context, situating events in a time and place, developing a point of view, developing characters’ motives. In grades 9-11, narrative elements may include, in addition to the grades 3-8 elements, outlining step-by-step procedures, creating one or more points of view, and constructing event models of what happened. The elements to be assessed are expressed in grade-level standards 3 for writing. A response is considered unscoreable if it cannot be assigned a score based on the rubric criteria. For unscoreable student responses, one of the following condition codes will be applied: A=No response B=Response is unintelligible or undecipherable C=Response is not written in English D=Off-topic E=Refusal to respond F=Don’t understand/know ***NOTE from Sarah Tantillo, Ed.D, LLC on 12-9-14: I modified these rubrics to make them more user-friendly while still preserving the content. PARCC noted when releasing the originals on 7-29-14 that they are “subject to further refinement based on research and study.” Stay tuned!