United Nations Development Programme
Country: Indonesia
Initiation Plan
Project Title:
Promoting Justice and Rights in Indonesia (PJRI)
Expected CP Outcome(s):
CPAP (2011-2015) Outcome 3.3: Justice providers and institutions are more effective in protecting
human rights, and citizens enjoy improved access to justice
CPD (2016-2020) Outcome 4: By 2020, all Indonesians, particularly the poor and most vulnerable
benefit from enhanced access to justice and more responsive, inclusive and accountable public
institutions.
Initiation Plan Start Date:
16 September 2015
Initiation Plan End Date:
15 August 2016
Implementing Partner:
UNDP
Brief Description
The absence of access to justice affects minority groups including the fishing communities who are
disproportinately affected by the poor coastal and marine resources management and the Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex (LGBTI) communities. These minority groupsare faced with
challenges due to their inability to have their grievances heard and resolved.
The UNDP Promoting Justice and Rights in Indonesia (PJRI) Project Initiation Plan will: (a) pilot initiatives
to advance, in particular, LGBTI rights; and (b) develop a programme document that extends the rights
of LGBTI and vulnerable groups within the fishing communities who are disproporinately affected by
poor coastal and marine management.
In the long-run, UNDP efforts will seek to eliminate barriers that prevent minorities in accessing justice,
rights and basic services, while also strengthening the integrity and accountability of government
institutions in the Indonesian justice system.
Total resources required:
USD 248,241.38
Regular
o

DSS 2016:
USD 10,000
US Dept.of State:
USD 203,961.70
Other:
o
Parallel Funding:


BRH-BLIA Phase 2:
USD 9,279.68
Output 2 (Programme Document)
-SAJI Project:
USD 25,000
Agreed by UNDP:
___________
CPAP Programme Component: ___________
Total allocated resources:

Programme Period:
Atlas Award ID:
___________
PAC Meeting Date
___________
List of Abbreviations
Komnas HAM
UNDP
LGBTIQ
BPS
IUU Fishing
SNPK
CPD
CPAP
PJRI
PIP
BLIA
Komnas Perempuan
SOGI
GWL-INA Forum
APF
CHS
OHCHR
RPJMN
RKP
GOI
ASEAN
SAJI Project
BRH
DGPRU
Prodoc
CD
DCD
DSS
US
PAC
MPR
National Commission on Human Rights (Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi
Manusia)
United Nations Development Programme
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Queer
Central Statistics Agency (Badan Pusat Statistik)
Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing
National Conflict Monitoring System (Sistem Nasional Pemantauan
Kekerasan)
Country Programme Document
Country Programme Action Plan
Promoting Justice and Rights in Indonesia
Project Initiation Plan
Being LGBTI in Asia
National Commission on Violence Against Women (Komisi Nasional
Anti Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan)
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Gay, Waria, Lesbian – Indonesia Forum
The Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions
Complaints Handling System
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
National Mid-Term Development Plan (Rencana Pembangunan
Jangka Menengah Nasional)
Government Work Plan (Rencana Kerja Pemerintah)
Government of Indonesia
Association of South East Asian Nations
Strengthening Access to Justice in Indonesia Project
UNDP Bangkok Regional Hub
Democratic Governance & Poverty Reduction Unit
Project Document
Country Director
Deputy Country Director
Development Support Service
United States
Project Appraisal Committee
Peoples’ Legislative Assembly (Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat)
2
I.
PURPOSE
Since the fall of the authoritarian regime under the former President Suharto and the instatement of
democracy in 1997/1998, the government has made significant in-roads to extend access to justice,
particularly for the poor and vulnerable, and strengthening public institutions so that they are more
responsive, inclusive and accountable.
UNDP defines access to justice as “the ability of people to seek and obtain remedy through formal or
informal institutions of justice, in conformity with human rights standards” 1. Such institutions include, but
are not limited to, the judiciary/courts of law, state administrative bodies and institutions, legal aid
providers, and informal or customary (adat) justice councils. Recent examples of government progress in
extending access to justice include: a stronger legal and regulatory framework for public complaints and
handling mechanisms and the provision of free legal aid; and concerted efforts to try to more clearly
demarcate the jurisdictional boundaries between the formal and informal justice systems, as well as the
national, provincial and district/city governments role with regards to promoting informal justice.2
Despite this progress, much work remains to be done by the Government before it secures access
to justice for all.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) Groups serve as a case in point.
Although homosexuality is not criminalized under the law, the recent ‘Being LGBT in Asia: Indonesia
Country Report’3 shines a spotlight on how discriminatory by-laws and practices are effectively preventing
LGBTI individuals from exercising rights enjoyed by other (non-LGBTI) citizens in Indonesia. Male-tofemale transgender individuals (often called ‘waria’ in Indonesia) are the most vulnerable of the LGBTI
group due to their clear non-conforming gender expression. Social exclusion for LGBTI individuals start
within the family then expands to schools, the workplace, and broader public life. This negatively impinges
on the health and wellbeing of LGBTI individuals.
Vulnerable groups (including poor coastal fishing communities) who are disproportionately
affected by unsustainable coastal and marine management practices, serve as another case in point.
Modern-day slavery is linked to illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing practices in
Indonesia. The most recent incident in the press, involved a registered Indonesian vessel in Benjina, Maluku,
which allegedly imposed forced labour practices on its workers, even confining some of its male workers to
cages.4 According to the Ministry of Marine Resources and Fisheries, illegal, unregulated, and unreported
(IUU) fishing, including by foreign parties, is a major problem in Indonesia. The current President of
Indonesia has publicly stated there are 5,000 foreign fishing boats operating illegally in Indonesian waters.5
A significant side-effect of unsustainable terrestrial and marine resource extraction is increased
incidences of violent conflict. Data from Indonesia’s National Conflict Monitoring System (SNPK) reveal
that violent conflict related to natural resources increased by 26 percent between 2010 and 2014. Strong
vested economic interests have put additional pressure on communities that may have already been dealing
with social conflict related to land or natural resource use. In their position paper “Kriminalisasi”
(criminalization) a coalition of Indonesian NGOs, claimed that rather than seeking redress for such conflict
via the civil justice system, conflicts over land-use and natural resources are reported and processed through
the criminal justice system. This creates uncertainty and questions the integrity of the justice system.6
1
UNDP (2012) Access to Justice Assessments in the Asia Pacific: A Review of Tools and Experiences for the Region,
UNDP Asia Pacific Regional Centre, Bangkok, February, p.11, http://www.asiapacific.undp.org/content/dam/rbap/docs/Research%20&%20Publications/Democratic%20Governance/APRC-DG-2012A2J_Assessments.pdf, (Accessed 04/04/15).
2 See, UNDP Indonesia (2015)Theory of Change for Country Programme Document (2016-2020), Outcome 4, p.1.
3 UNDP-USAID (2014) Being LGBT in Asia: Indonesia Country Report, Bangkok.
4The Jakarta Post, Jokowi orders probe into Benjina slavery case, 8 April 2015.
5 Cited in UNDP Indonesia (2015)Theory of Change for Country Programme Document (2016-2020), Outcome 3.
6 PSHK, LEIP, LBH JAKARTA, KEMITRAAN, KONTRAS, MAPPI, YLBHI, KPA, LBH MASYARAKAT, WALHI, Kriminalisasi,
2015.
3
The recent ‘Theory of Change for (Outcome 3 and 4 of) the Country Programme Document (20162020)’, identifies i) geographical, educational, financial and socio-cultural barriers to accessing justice, ii)
coordination issues among justice and public service providers at the different levels of government; iii)
human resource constraints to providing quality services; iv) weak public influence over government
policy and decision making, v) weak enforcement and monitoring of laws, regulations and policies, vi)
high market demand for commodities, vii) uncontrolled and illegal issuance of permits to exploit natural
resources at land and on the seas, and viii) competing priorities over natural resource management, as
some of the underlying causes to the access to justice issues described above.
UNDP Indonesia has extensive experience in the justice sector, including the environmental justice
sector, through projects including the Legal Empowerment and Assistance for the Disadvantaged (LEAD)
Project (2007-2011), the Aceh Justice Project (2007-2011), the Strengthening Access to Justice in Indonesia
(SAJI) Project (2012-), Participatory Governance Assessment for REDD+ Implementation in Indonesia (PGA)
Project (2011-) and EU-UNDP Support to Justice Sector Reform in Indonesia (SUSTAIN) Project (2014-).
Under this Project Initiation Plan (PIP), UNDP will: i) with funding from the US Government, pilot
initiatives to advance LGBTI rights in Indonesia, and; ii) develop a programme document that addresses
some of the underlying causes of access to justice issues faced by vulnerable groups who are
disproportionately affected by unsustainable coastal and marine practices in Indonesia.
II.
EXPECTED OUTPUTS
The Initiation Plan, entitled ‘Promoting Justice and Rights in Indonesia’ (PJRI), will provide UNDP with
sufficient time and resources to detail how the Country Office will advance access to justice issues and
strengthen human rights systems in Indonesia. Under this PIP, UNDP will (i) pilot initiatives to advance, in
particular, LGBTI rights; and (b) develop a programme document that extends the rights of LGBTI and
vulnerable groups within the fishing communities who are disproportionately affected by poor coastal and
marine management.
Output 1: Significantly increase awareness of LGBTI rights within the National Commission for Human
Rights (Komnas HAM) and support it to launch the LGBTI Minority Desk
‘Being LGBT in Asia (BLIA)’ Phase 1, an initiative by UNDP’s Regional Bureau of the Asia Pacific (RBAP),
among other things, assessed the current state of LGBTI rights in Indonesia. Under BLIA Phase 2, UNDP
Indonesia and other Regional Country Offices, with funding from the RBAP, will address the findings of BLIA
Phase 1.
Under this output, the US State Department will provide additional funds to the Country Office to
implement the findings of BLIA Phase 1, through pilot initiatives to strengthen individual and institutional
competencies and systems within KOMNAS HAM to advance LGBTI rights under government
programmes and policies.
Activity Result 1.1. Komnas HAM’s awareness about Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) issues is
increased through training
Actions:
1.1.1. Develop training materials in consultation with Komnas HAM’s Unit for Education (DIKLU), Unit for Internal
Institutional Development (Pengembangan), as well as LGBTIQ and GWL-INA Forums
1.1.2. Facilitate internal training session for Jakarta based staff – tailor made for each unit
1.1.3. Facilitate internal training session for Komnas HAM subnational level representatives from 6 provinces
1.1.4. Report the result of internal training to Komnas HAM Chairperson, Vice Chairperson and Special Rapporteur
for Minority Issues; and advocate for annual refresher training for all staff
Activity Result 1.2. LGBT Minority Desk is established and operationalized
Actions:
1.2.1. Develop the concept of minority desk in consultation with minority and LGBTIQ groups. Determine the scope of
work, define the term “minority”, develop operational procedures and policies, rules of engagement with CSOs,
4
complaint handling procedures for minority and LGBT persons, roadmap for drafting Special Rapporteur’s Annual
Report and other strategic actions as a follow up to the release of the report
1.2.2. Consult Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) or The Asia Pacific Forum of National
Human Rights Institutions (APF) on Minority Desk concept
1.2.3. Develop internal office memo (Komnas HAM) on assignment of staff to Minority Desk
1.2.4. Launch the establishment of LGBT Minority Desk by inviting minority groups and the media
Activity Result 1.3. SOGI and rights-based violation disaggregated data is produced by CHS
Actions:
1.3.1. Assess the current capacity and coding of Komnas HAM’s Complaint Handling System (CHS)
1.3.2. In consultation with the minority and LGBTIQ groups, improve the coding system so that it can classify LGBT
and access to health cases
1.3.3. Consult OHCHR and/or APR for good practices in setting up CHS
1.3.4. Integrate the CHS system with Investigation and Mediation System, online complaint system and case tracking
system and provide access to clients to track case progress
1.3.5. Test new system for ease of access including data inputting by LGBT groups, including with Commissioners
1.3.6. Launch the new online complaint handling system and ensure that LGBT groups know how to submit a
complaint online
Source of Budget: UNDP Bangkok Regional Hub through BLIA Phase 2 and US Department of State
Output 2: Programme Document developed to advance justice and rights issues in Indonesia
Under the Mid-Term National Development Plan (RPJMN), the development of Indonesia’s maritime
industry and its seas is identified as one of four priority sectors. On 15 June, the 2016 Government Work
Plan (Rencana Kerja Pemerintah/RKP) was approved through Presidential Regulation No. 60/2015. The
RPJMN is implemented through these work plans. The RKP focuses on increased economic productivity
from Indonesia’s seas, and the better enforcement of laws and regulations to eradicate illegal, unreported, and
unregulated fishing in Indonesia’s territorial waters.7 However, as pointed out by the People’s Coalition for
Fishery Related Justice (Koalisi Rakyat untuk Keadilan Perikanan/KIARA) the RKP falls short of prioritizing
support to coastal communities.8 This is problematic as the Benjina case (discussed above) just represents
“the tip of the iceberg”, with modern day slavery in the fisheries sector an issue that must be resolved
swiftly by the government.9
The government has also taken policy measures to respond to natural resource management related
conflict. For instance, it has tried to address conflict between indigenous communities and the state and/or
private companies through Minister of Agrarian Affairs Regulation No.5/1999 and Peoples’ Legislative
Assembly (MPR) Decree No. IX/MPR/2001 regarding ‘Agrarian Reform and Natural Resources
Management’.10 More recently, it has tried to address broader social conflict issues, through Law No.
7/2012 on ‘Social Conflict Management’ and Presidential Instruction No. 2/2013 regarding ‘Controlling
Internal Security Interference’ (Penanganan Gangguan Keamanan Dalam Negeri).11 However, the government
has not been able to effectively enforce the implementation of such policies. As a result, natural resource
management related conflict has continued unabaited. Specifically on women’s rights linked to the coastal
and marine resources, women play a crucial role in marine environments and fisheries economies,
specifically in the small-scale and artisanal fisheries sector, though their contribution is still invisible and
unacknowledged. They represent half of the total working population worldwide in the seafood industry as
a whole, with fisheries, aquaculture, seafood processing and all related services. Women also play a large
role in inland fisheries, which is an important sector for food security. Women's activities, paid and unpaid,
include the full range along the value chain, as well as pre- and post-harvest activities. This includes
seaweed and shellfish collection, fishing, weaving and repairing nets, processing, sales, and local and intra7
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 60 Tahun 2015, Bab 5 Pembangunan Bidang, Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Tahun 2016, p. 5125.
8 KIARA, Siaran Pers Kasus Perbudakan Kapal Perikanan, 21 Agustus 2015.
9 KIARA, Siaran Pers Kasus Perbudakan Kapal Perikanan, 13 April 2015.
10 Muhdar, Muhammad, Nasir, Resolusi Konflik terhadap Sengketa Penguasaan Lahan dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya
Alam, Kertas Kerja Epistema No. 03/2012, Epistema Institute, p. 9.
11 Pengelolaan Konflik SDA dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Keamanan, http://indonesia.go.id/in/pemerintahdaerah/provinsi-sulawesi-selatan/investasi/13927-pengelolaan-konflik-sda-dalam-perspektif-hukum-dan-keamanan,
(Accessed 10 September 2015).
5
regional trade. Women in small-scale fisheries also play key roles in managing finances at the household
level and managing aquatic resources at the community level. This does not necessarily translate to
decision-making power for women, as these roles are generally ignored and undervalued. Women in
indigenous and local coastal communities have extensive local and traditional ecological knowledge, which
contributes towards the sustainable use and conservation of marine and coastal ecosystems. Women in the
small-scale and artisanal fisheries sector have difficulty securing their rights as workers because their role is
often unrecognized. They have limited or no access to social security, capital and credit, and face hardships
in securing land rights and access to fishery resources. They also face unsafe, unhygienic, and unfair
working conditions. In most places, women in post-harvest activities are constantly struggling for even basic
facilities at landing centres and markets. The lack of capital accessible to women in small-scale fisheries
means a lack of resources to buy necessary equipment for storing fish, maintaining quality and freshness,
which results in less control over markets. In the workplace and at the community and household level
women are exposed to abuse including in the aforementioned slavery cases. In small-scale fishing
communities in general, and for women in particular, access to education, healthcare and sanitation are
severely compromised. Women affected by disasters are particularly vulnerable. Their knowledge is hardly
recognized, though they have valuable ideas on how to improve the sustainable use of marine resources.
Women are poorly represented in decision-making spaces and leadership roles in fisheries. 12
UNDP Indonesia will assist the Government of Indonesia to develop a strategy and plan to address
the above problems, under this PIP. The resultant programme document, will among other things, map
appropriate actions to address the: (a) alleged abuse of the criminal justice system to resolve natural
resource related conflict, especially in coastal and marine areas; and (b) alleged IUU related cases of modern
day slavery within Indonesia’s territorial waters.
Finally, the programme document, will likely include actions to upscale Output 1 results.
Activity Result 2.1. Access to justice assessment undertaken, and recommendations provided on possible
programmatic and policy interventions
The purpose of this assessment is to identify, among other things: i) the root and underlying causes of access
to justice problems (especially those related to unsustainable natural resource management) in Indonesia; ii)
what other (government and non-government) actors/institutions are doing to address the root and
underlying causes of access to justice problems; iii) what other (government and non-government)
actors/institutions have done in ASEAN comparable countries to address similar problems; iv) gaps in the
current response; and v) in what ways UNDP can further access to justice in Indonesia.
Actions:
2.1.1 Gather data through desk-review, in-depth interviews, comparative studies, focus group discussions, and/or other
data collection techniques
2.1.2 Consult with government and non-governmental organizations on the initial findings and recommendations of the
preliminary assessment, including through the circulation of a preliminary report
2.1.3 Adjust findings and recommendations of assessment and report based on such consultations, as needed
2.1.4 Finalize report
2.1.5 Disseminate results of report
Activity Result 2.2. Develop programme document on “Promoting Justice and Rights in Indonesia"
(PJRI)
In response to recommendations from the assessment, UNDP Indonesia, in consultation with its main
government counterparts, will develop a programme concept note designed to advance the rights of
vulnerable groups in Indonesia who are disproportionately affected by unsustainable natural resource
management practices.
UNDP will also develop a resource mobilization strategy and plan to communicate and market the
programme concept note to traditional and non-traditional donors. If this resource management strategy is
12
Matthews, Elizabeth, Jamie Bechtel, Easkey Britton, Karl Morrison and Caleb McClennen (2012). A Gender Perspective
on Securing Livelihoods and Nutrition in Fish-dependent Coastal Communities. Report to The Rockefeller Foundation
from Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY
6
effective, and funding for the programme concept is assured, UNDP will then translate the programme
concept into a programme document to operationalize the PJRI.
Actions:
2.2.1. Formulate programme concept note in response to recommendations from the assessment, and through further
data collection if needed
2.2.2. Develop PJRI resource mobilization strategy and plan that can effectively communicate and market the
programme concept note to traditional and non-traditional donors
2.2.3. Implement resource mobilization strategy and plan
2.2.4. If external funds are mobilized, translate the programme concept into a programme document
Source of Budget: SAJI Project and DSS 2016
III.
MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS
Project Board
Beneficiaries
Komnas HAM, KPP,
Bappenas,
Assurance
UNDP DPGRU
Team A
BLIA
IV.
Executive
UNDP Country
Director/Deputy Country
Director
Supplier
UNDP Bangkok Regional
Hub (BRH)
Project Manager
Team B
Prodoc formulation
Project Operations Team
MONITORING
The monitoring framework will be established by the Project Manager at the initial stage of project
implementation and will be composed of the following components:
1. Costed monitoring plan with defined benchmarks, indicators and targets, that is clearly aligned to the
results and resources framework
2. Work Plans with detailed activities, budget and reporting mechanisms, with clearance from DGPRU
Head and endorsed by the CD/DCD
7
3. Quarterly Monitoring Reports, which among other things, monitor results, issues and risks, and lessons
learned
4. A Final Project Review by the Executive which examines, among other things, monitoring reports and
products prepared by the Project Manager
8
V.
WORK PLAN
Year: 16 September 2015 – 15 August 2016
EXPECTED
OUTPUTS
PLANNED ACTIVITIES
List activity results and associated actions
And baseline, indicators
including annual targets
Output 1: Significantly
increase awareness of
LGBTI rights within
the National
Commission on
Human Rights
(Komnas HAM) and
support it to launch
LGBTI Minority Desk
Baseline:
No
minority
established
LGBT
desk
Indicators: Extent to
which LGBT minority
desk is established and
functional
Targets: LGBT Minority
Desk is established and
functional,
as
evidenced through:
TIMEFRAME
Q3/15
Q4/15
Q1/16
PLANNED BUDGET
Q2/16
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY
Funding
Source
Budget
Description
Amount (in USD)
1.1 Activity Result: Komnas HAM’s awareness about Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) issues is increased through
training
1.1.1. Develop training materials in
consultation with Komnas HAM’s Sub
Commission for Education & Counseling, as
well as LGBTIQ and GWL-INA Forums
6,836.50 (Y2015)
UNDP
US DoS
1.1.2. Facilitate internal training session for
Jakarta based staff – tailor made for each
unit.
UNDP
US DoS
1.1.3. Facilitate internal training session for
Komnas HAM subnational level
representatives from 6 provinces
UNDP
US DoS
1.1.4 Report the result of internal training to
Komnas HAM Chairperson, Vice
Chairperson and Special Rapporteur for
Minority Issues; and advocate for annual
refresher training for all staff
1.2. Activity Result: LGBT Minority Desk is established and operationalized
9,209.50 (Y2016)
3,375.28 (Y2015)
14,465.04 (Y2016)
14,265.12 (Y2016)
11,363.28 (Y2016)
UNDP
US DoS
1)
An
Operational
Guideline
for
the
Minority Desk
2) Media coverage on
the launching of the
Minority Desk
3) Annual Report that
includes # of LGBT
cases addressed by
Komnas HAM
4) SOGI disaggregated
data of Komnas HAM’s
CHS
(Complaint
Handling System)
Related CP outcome:
CPAP
(2011-2015)
Outcome 3.3: Justice
providers
and
institutions are more
effective in protecting
human rights, and
citizens enjoy improved
access to justice
CPD
(2016-2020)
Outcome 4: By 2020, all
Indonesians,
particularly the poor
and most vulnerable
benefit from enhanced
access to justice and
more
responsive,
1.2.1. Develop the concept of minority desk
in consultation with minority and LGBTIQ
groups. Determine the scope of work, define
the term “minority”, develop operational
procedures and policies, rules of engagement
with CSOs, complaint handling procedures
for minority and LGBT persons, roadmap for
drafting Special Rapporteur’s Annual Report
and other strategic actions as a follow up to
the release of the report
1.2.2. Consult Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
or The Asia Pacific Forum of National
Human Rights Institutions (APF) on
Minority Desk concept
58,859.44 (Y2016)
UNDP
US DoS
9,268.28 (Y2016)
UNDP
US DoS
UNDP
1.2.3. Develop internal office memo (Komnas
HAM) on assignment of staff to Minority
Desk
KOMNAS
HAM
1.2.4. Launch the establishment of LGBT
Minority Desk by inviting minority groups
and the media
1,588.78 (Y2015)
US DoS
US DoS
4,766.34 (Y2016)
1,977.50 (Y2016)
1.3.Activity Result : SOGI and rights-based violation disaggregated data is produced by CHS
1.3.1. Assess the current capacity and
coding of Komnas HAM’s Complaint
Handling System (CHS)
1.3.2. In consultation with the minority and
LGBTIQ groups, improve the coding system
so that it can classify LGBT and access to
health cases
UNDP
US DoS
14,125 (Y2015)
14,125 (Y2016)
847.50
UNDP
UNDP
1.3.3. Consult OHCHR and/or APR for good
practices in setting up CHS
10
US DoS
US DoS
(Y2016)
9,268.26 (Y2016)
inclusive
accountable
institutions
and
public
Output 2: Programme
Document developed
to advance justice and
rights issues in
Indonesia
Baseline:
No
programme document
developed
Indicator: Extent to
which
programme
document developed
Target:
Programme
document developed
and
approved
by
Implementing Partner
Related CP outcome:
CPAP
(2011-2015)
Outcome 3.3: Justice
providers
and
1.3.4. Integrate the CHS system with
Investigation and Mediation System, online
complaint system and case tracking system
and provide access to clients to track case
progress
1.3.5. Test new system for ease of access
including data inputting by LGBT groups,
including with Commissioners
1.3.6.Launch the new online complaint
handling system and ensure that LGBT
groups know how to submit a complaint
online.
Subtotal Output 1
847.50
UNDP
US DoS
UNDP
US DoS
(Y2016)
10,848 (Y2015)
12,204 (Y2016)
8,475 (Y2016)
UNDP
US DoS
190,401.70
2.1. Activity Result: Access to justice assessment undertaken, and recommendations provided on possible programmatic and policy
interventions
2.1.1. Gather data through desk-review, indepth interviews, comparative studies, focus
group discussions, and/or other data
collection techniques including the data and
analysis of impact of lack of access for women
to justice in the coastal and marine
resources.
6,000
2.1.2. Consult with government and nongovernmental organizations on the initial
findings and recommendations of the
preliminary assessment, including through
the circulation of a preliminary report
2.1.3. Adjust findings and recommendations
of assessment and report based on such
consultations, as needed, including on how
to address the gender gap and empower
women in the fishery sector.
11
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
(Y2015)
3,000
(Y2015)
1000
(Y2015)
institutions are more
effective in protecting
human rights, and
citizens enjoy improved
access to justice
CPD
(2016-2020)
Outcome 4: By 2020, all
Indonesians,
particularly the poor
and most vulnerable
benefit from enhanced
access to justice and
more
responsive,
inclusive
and
accountable
public
institutions
2.1.4. Finalize report
2.1.5. Disseminate results of report
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
(Y2015)
1000
(Y2015)
2.2. Activity Result: Develop programme document on “Promoting Justice and Rights in Indonesia” (PJRI)
2.2.1. Formulate programme concept note in
response to recommendations from the
assessment, and through further data
collection if needed
2.2.2. Develop PJRI resource mobilization
strategy and plan that can effectively
communicate and market the programme
concept note to traditional and nontraditional donors
2.2.3. Implement resource mobilization
strategy and plan
2.2.4. If external funds are mobilized,
translate the programme concept into a
programme document
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
UNDP
SAJI
Project
& DSS
2016
6,000
(Y2015)
3,000
(Y2015)
4,000
(Y2016)
10,000
(Y2016)
35,000
Subtotal Output 2
Personnel
1000
0
1. Project Manager (SC 9) – 100%
2. Team BLIA Support (Technical Officer
SOGIE – SC 8) – 10%
UNDP
12
UNDP
BRHBLIA2
2,319.92 (Y2015)
6,959.76 (Y2016)
3,390
UNDP
3. Project Operations Team – 50%
SubTotal Personnel
US DoS
(Y2015)
10,170
(Y2016)
22,839.68
248,241.38
TOTAL
13