0 Algebra 2 Content Rubric F-BF Build new functions from existing functions 1 2 Did Not Meet Standard The student was not able to meet the criteria for a Level 1 response. Student was able to do one of the following: Student was able to do two of the following: Support Kyle: a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c < 0 OR a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c>0 Support Sandy: (zero roots) a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c<0 OR a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c>0 For neither correct: (one root) Vertex lies on x axis (-5 ≤ a ≤ 5) with −5 ≤ 𝑏 ≤ 5 and c = 0 For example, Support Kyle: a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c < 0 OR a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c>0 Support Sandy: (zero roots) a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c < 0 OR a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c>0 For neither correct: (1 root) Vertex lies on x axis (-5 ≤ a ≤ 5) with −5 ≤ 𝑏 ≤ 5 and c =0 3 4 Met Standard Student was able to: Student was able to: Support Kyle: Support Kyle: a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c < 0 a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c < 0 OR OR a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c>0 c>0 Support Sandy: Support Sandy: (zero roots) (zero roots) a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, a < 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c<0 c<0 OR OR a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, a > 0, -5 ≤ b ≤ 5, c>0 c>0 For neither correct: For neither correct: (one root) (one root) Vertex lies on x axis (5 ≤ a ≤ 5) with −5 ≤ Vertex lies on x axis (-5 𝑏 ≤ 5 and c = 0. ≤ a ≤ 5) with −5 ≤ 𝑏 ≤ 5 and c = 0. AND Justifies the connections of the parameters: a, b and c to the number of roots. ALD/Claim 3 Standards for Mathematical Practice 3 Students can clearly Construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others. 1 0 1 2 Did not meet Standard 3 4 Met Standard Exceeds Standard Level 3 students should be able to use stated assumptions, definitions and previously established results and examples to test and support their reasoning or to identify, explain and repair the flaw in an argument. Students should be able to break an argument into cases to determine when the argument does or does not hold. Level 4 students should be able to use stated assumptions definitions and previously established results to support their reasoning or repair and explain the flaw in an argument. They should be able to construct a chain of logic to justify or refute a proposition or conjecture and to determine the conditions under which an argument does or does not apply. 1 Level 0 students are unable to provide an argument or identify obvious flawed arguments in familiar contexts Level 1 students should be able to base arguments on concrete referents such as objects drawings, diagrams, and actions and identify obvious flawed arguments in familiar contexts. 2015 Content and ALD Claim 3/Math Practice 3 Rubrics Level 2 students should be able to find and identify the flaw in an argument by using examples or particular cases. Students should be able to break a familiar argument given in a highly scaffolded situation into cases to determine when the argument does or does not hold. Practice Task Specific Rubric 0 2 Student does not meet criteria for Level 1. Student should give justification to support either Sandy’s statement, Kyle’s statement or by disproving both Sandy and Kyle by supporting the statement that the equation can produce one root (number 3). Student justifies with a sketch of a graph or a written explanation. 2 2 3 4 Did not meet Standard Math Practice 3 The Roots in an Absolute Value Function 1 2015 Content and ALD Claim 3/Math Practice 3 Rubrics Met Standard Student should give justification to support two of the following: Two roots No roots One Root Student justifies the two statements with a sketch of a graph or a written explanation. Student should give justification to support three of the following: Two roots No roots One Root Student justifies each of the three statements with a sketch of a graph or a written explanation. Exceeds Standard Student should give justification to support three of the following: Two roots No roots One Root Student justifies each of the three statements with both a sketch of a graph and a written explanation.