Rosneath Peninsula West Community Development Trust COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN MAY 2011 Prepared for RPWCDT by Community Links Scotland Rosneath Peninsula West Community Development Trust www.rosneathpeninsulawest.com Community Action Plan May 2011 Prepared by Community Links Scotland 63 Kilbowie Road Clydebank G81 1BL Tel: 0141 952 4382 Email: info@comlinks.org.uk Web: www.comlinks.org.uk Published May 2011 Copyright © Rosneath Peninsula West Community Development Trust, 2011 All rights reserved. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without express written permission. Photographs by Community Links Scotland Copies available from RPWCDT, Community Links Scotland and the library in Cove Burgh Hall. Acknowledgements: Thanks to Kilcreggan, Cove, Peaton, Ardpeaton and Portkil residents for their participation in the consultations. CONTENTS 1.0 Background 2.0 Introduction 3.0 Methodology and Summary 4.0 Needs Analysis 5.0 Policy Context 6.0 Demand Analysis 7.0 Project Prioritisation 8.0 Project Profiles Youth centre All-weather 5-a-side pitch Indoor sports facility Improved Rainbow Centre Play area Affordable family housing New business workshop spaces at Fort Road Sheltered housing Befriending services for the elderly Evening public transport Community petrol station Improvements of pavements Marine access facility Community festivals Nursery/after school club Watersports centre and marina Improvement of foreshore Community woodland Wind farm 9.0 Additional Project 10.0 Community Campus 11.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 12.0 Appendix 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 GEOGRAPHY The Rosneath Peninsula is located in the west of Scotland, in the Argyll and Bute Council area. It is surrounded by Gare Loch on the east, Loch Long on the west and the Clyde Estuary on the south. The peninsula is six miles long and between one mile and two and a half miles wide and encompasses the villages of Clynder, Rosneath, Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton. The Rosneath Peninsula is located approximately 50 miles from Glasgow. It is accessible by ferry from Gourock and by road leading around the north of the Peninsula, where it connects to Garelochhead. The nearest major town to the Rosneath Peninsula is Helensburgh, approximately 30 minutes by car from the furthest point on the Peninsula. 1.2 HISTORY Traditionally, the Peninsula was predominately agricultural; however, the development of steamboats in the early 19th century brought people along the Clyde to the peninsula, with the area developing into a popular holiday spot for wealthy Glaswegians. Many of the impressive houses which were built at this time still stand along the shore front today. Initially, these were used predominately as summer houses, however, in later years, as Glasgow became increasingly accessible, more people settled on the peninsula permanently. Before the massive expansion in private car ownership, the main way to access the peninsula was by ferry with numerous piers located all along the peninsula. These have gradually shut as the road north becomes the preferred way to access the peninsula with only one pier remaining in Kilcreggan. In the Second World War the Rosneath Peninsula developed as a key defence base, with both American and British Naval bases located in the north of the Peninsula. Since the 1960s, submarine nuclear deterrents, Polaris and then Trident, have also been based at Faslane. The Ministry of Defence is therefore still a major employer in the area and many peninsula residents either work or have worked at the naval bases. Many other residents commute to Glasgow or Helensburgh each day for work. Despite this, there is still strong community spirit in the area, with many community groups encompassing a wide variety of interests active on the Peninsula. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 ROSNEATH PENINSULA WEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRUST Rosneath Peninsula West Community Development Trust (RPWCDT) covers the area on the west side of the Rosneath Peninsula from 55°58”N to 56°06”N. It includes the communities of Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton, and Peaton. The Development Trust was formed with the consent of the Cove and Kilcreggan Community Council to take forward the aspirations of the Rosneath Peninsula West. The Trust Board was formed in April 2010 and had fifteen members. The first role of the Development Trust, as agreed with the Community Council, was to find out what the needs, priorities and aspirations were for the residents of the area and to find ways forward to achieve these. The Trust appointed Community Links Scotland to carry out extensive community consultation, liaise with MAST architects and all other relevant organizations and to bring together the various strands of a Community Action Plan. 3 2.2 TIMESCALE The Community Action Plan was launched alongside the Community Development Trust on November 6th 2010 and followed a timescale highlighted below. DATE ACTION TAKEN NOVEMBER 6TH 2010 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN LAUNCH - 150 ATTENDED NOVEMBER 2010 COMMUNITY, LOCAL GROUPS & BUSINESS CONSULTATION - 417 SURVEYS COMPLETED NOVEMBER 2010 NEEDS ANALYSIS, POLICY CONTEXT DECEMBER 2010 SURVEY RESULTS & FIRST DRAFT PROPOSALS FEBRUARY 2011 COMMUNITY PRIORITISATION EVENT - 165 PARTICIPATED MARCH 2011 OUTLINE DRAFT PROJECTS WITH TRUST APRIL 2011 PREPARE FINAL ACTION PLAN REPORT MAY 2011 PRESENT PLAN TO COMMUNITY TRUST AND PENINSULA WEST COMMUNITY 2.3 CONTENT OF COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN A Community Action Plan of this nature will provide the Trust with a clear and realistic end product which they can use to further the aims and ambitions of the client group as a whole in addition to individual groups and organisations in the villages. The resulting document will therefore not only be reflective of the views of many of the residents, it will also provide tangible opportunities for individuals and groups to take their own priorities forward under a community plan umbrella. The Trust’s Community Action Plan has: Confirmed individual and community needs Identified various options to meet these needs Identified costs of the various options Identified fundraising needs and options, for immediate capital and longer term revenue/running costs Identified any targets which should be met in running costs Identified ownership of sites and buildings Detailed the designs which translate ideas into a proposal, which includes physical/financial implications Engaged with partner agencies, confirm their roles and agree their commitments in the development process Identified ways in which local people can become involved in the planning and decision making process to develop an understanding and ownership of the project. Identified employment opportunities Established means for encouraging new businesses 3.0 METHODOLOGY AND SUMMARY In order to prepare a Community Action Plan that was representative of the whole community of Rosneath Peninsula West, Community Links Scotland carried out an extensive and varied consultation and analysis which is summarised below. 4 3.1 NEEDS ANALYSIS Identifying the underlying needs of the community involved an analysis of the socio-economic profile of the Peninsula West and surrounding areas using statistics from the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), Small Area Population Estimates (SAPE), Census and Official Labour Market Statistics (Nomis). This found that the population of the area as a whole is declining; however, people of pensionable age are increasing both in absolute terms and as a proportion of the population, while the numbers of children and working age adults are declining. The area has a large number of households with dependent children and 16 - 19 year olds make up a larger than average proportion of the population. There are relatively high levels of income and employment among residents, however, many people leave the Peninsula each day for work. There are also relatively high house prices and poor childcare provision making it difficult for families with young children in particular to move to the area. The peninsula is in a relatively isolated rural area, however, there are still a high number of local services including a doctor’s surgery, community centre, local shops and post office. 3.2 POLICY CONTEXT This section identified a number of national and local government policies to explore how the Community Action Plan and the projects outlined could contribute to the aims and objectives of these policies. The policies researched were: National Policies Scottish Government Purpose, Strategic Objectives and National Outcomes Government Economic Strategy The Scottish Economic Recovery Plan - Update from 3rd March 2010 Community Learning and Development Strategy Skills for Scotland: A Lifelong Skills Strategy All Our Futures: Planning for a Scotland with an Ageing Population Enterprising Third Sector: Action Plan 2008-2011 Scottish Community Empowerment Action Plan: Celebrating Success, Inspiring Change Local Policies Argyll and Bute Structure Plan and Local Plan Argyll and Bute Single Outcome Agreement The Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 Argyll and Bute Council Corporate Plan 2010 – 2013 and beyond Argyll and Bute Council Equality and Diversity Scheme 2009 – 2012 Argyll and Bute’s Integrated Children’s Services Plan 2009 – 2012 Argyll and Bute’s Older Persons Charter 2008-10 Community Safety Strategy 2009-2012 Antisocial Behaviour Strategy 2005-2008 Argyll and Bute Local Transport Strategy 2007-2010: Moving Forward Argyll and Bute Local Housing Strategy 2004 -2009 Argyll and Bute Woodlands and Forestry Strategy Argyll & Bute Community Planning Partnership’s Community Engagement Strategy 3.3 DEMAND ANALYSIS In order to gather information on areas of concern and the priorities of the local community for development of the Peninsula West area, four consultations were conducted with individual households, young people, community groups and local businesses. Household Survey 5 The individual households survey was sent to all adults within the Peninsula West area, a total of 1,268 adults. 28.5% of the adult population (a total of 361) of Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton responded and provided their opinion on the most important issues facing the area. The survey required respondents to rate their priorities in six areas: business and housing, transport, health and welfare, physical environment, employment and tourism, and community and recreation. Respectively, the top priority issues selected by local residents were: affordable housing, availability of petrol, sheltered housing, improvement of foreshore, crèche facilities/after school club and a young people’s place. Other issues that were highlighted by respondents as key areas of concern or priorities for development in the Peninsula West area were: Public transport including ferry and bus timetables and frequency Support for young people to find and sustain employment and remain in the area Appearance of the village generally, in particular to promote tourism Promoting tourism through community events Tourist facilities/attractions to increase business opportunities in the area A sports hall and outdoor sports facilities Small business units/workshops Young People’s Survey A young people’s survey regarding a potential youth facility was conducted by youth work staff during outreach sessions in Kilcreggan. 20 young people aged between 10 and 16 from the Kilcreggan area completed this, about a fifth of this age group in the area. 75% thought that there was not enough for young people to do in the area, 90% indicated they would use a new youth facility and 80% felt a young people’s place would prevent young people from getting into trouble. The top facilities selected by the young people for inclusion in a young people’s place were: sports hall, cinema, café and games room. The top activities to be held in a young people’s place were: youth activities, keep-fit, music and dance of all kinds. Finally the young people surveyed also indicated they felt that services such as careers/jobs advice, money/welfare rights advice and youth drop-in centre should be provided at a new young people’s place. Community Groups Survey The community groups survey was sent to 59 community groups in the Peninsula West area with 25 groups (42% of identified groups) responding. The majority of the groups currently use Cove Burgh Hall and believed this to be adequate for their purposes. A third of respondent community groups indicated that they required financial support to continue to run and almost 50% said that they would benefit from additional information and advice regarding funding sources. This was also the top priority group support for local community groups. The main priorities of the community groups surveyed were for the provision of community notice boards, lockable storage, and leaflets, publications or information stands. Business Survey A local businesses survey was sent to 66 identified businesses located in the Peninsula West area. 11 local businesses responded to the questionnaire, employing 53 staff between them. The majority of businesses indicated they did not have any problems sourcing labour or services in the Peninsula West area. Almost 50% of respondents selected information on potential grant funding sources for development initiatives as the top priority business support service. The top priority transport issue for local businesses was competitively priced fuel sourcing, followed by village centre parking. Appearance of the village generally was selected as the top environment issue in relation to the dayto-day running and future developments of the business. 6 3.4 PROJECT PRIORITISATION From the responses to the four consultations, 18 areas were identified for further prioritisation. At a community prioritisation event in February, 160 community members completed additional questions on their priorities for the local area and the form that projects to meet these should take. This enabled further prioritisation of the key projects to be pursued by the Trust and allowed details of the format of these projects to be determined. This resulted in the 19 project profiles outlines in section 6. 3.5 PROJECT PROFILES Each of the project profiles outlines the aims, outputs and outcomes to be expected from each project. They then detail how the projects would tackle community needs, meet the community demands and contribute to the national and local policies outlined in previous chapters. Finally, each profile sets out tangible projects which could be taken forward by the Trust or other local groups, along with examples of previous, similar projects conducted by groups in other communities to enable the Trust to meet their aims of taking forward the aspirations of the Rosneath Peninsula West community. The projects profiled are: Youth centre All-weather 5-a-side pitch Indoor sports facility Improved Rainbow Centre Affordable family housing Socially rented sheltered housing New business workshop spaces at Fort Road Rosneath Road (Mill Brae – Barbour Road) pavement Evening public transport Community petrol station Community woodland Play area Marine access facility Improvements to foreshore Community festivals Water sports centre/marina development Befriending service for elderly After school club/nursery Wind farm 3.6 COVE & KILCREGGAN COMMUNITY CAMPUS This section outlines in greater detail how each of the projects identified could work together to ensure that the aims of the Trust are met and the potential of the Peninsula West area is maximised. 4.0 NEEDS ANALYSIS SUMMARY The needs analysis used statistics from the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), Small Area Population Estimates (SAPE), Census and Official Labour Market Statistics (Nomis), amongst others, to identify the underlying needs of the Peninsula West community. The needs analysis showed that, similar to the Argyll and Bute Council, the Peninsula West area has an ageing population. However, there are also high levels of 16-19 year olds and households with dependent children. The population has also been declining in recent years, particularly the number of 7 children in the area. The life expectancy in the area is higher than both Argyll and Bute and Scotland averages, although there is some evidence of ill health and unhealthy lifestyle habits. On the whole, the area has relatively high levels of income and employment compared to Scotland. However, despite its proximity to Glasgow and the large towns of Helensburgh and Greenock, the area is relatively deprived for geographic access to services. There are low levels of people on out-ofwork benefits on the Peninsula, however, the vast majority of people leave the area each day to access employment. Of those that remain in the Peninsula for work, a high proportion are self employed. House prices in the Peninsula West area are relatively high, with the gap in prices between the rest of Argyll and Bute increasing in recent years. The needs analysis suggests that this is a relatively well off area although the high house prices may prevent some people from moving to or remaining in the area. On the whole, the area has an ageing population and is relatively isolated, suggesting care should be taken to ensure services and activities are provided to ensure the elderly population are not socially excluded. However, indications of higher than average numbers of 16-19 year olds and a declining number of families with children suggest that the area should ensure these residents are catered for to encourage them to remain on the peninsula. The low proportion of employees suggests the area is predominately made up of small businesses which can disadvantage local young people who may find it more difficult to access employment. 4.1 INTRODUCTION Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton are located along the west coast of the Rosneath peninsula. This section will utilise statistical information from the General Register of Scotland, the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2009, and the 2001 Census, amongst others, to illustrate the socioeconomic profile of this area. These figures will highlight the extent of deprivation and the main issues facing the area. Statistics have been selected to be the most recent, however, due to the breadth of information included, it is not possible for all data to come from the same year. 4.2 POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS Population estimates for mid 2007 are provided by the General Register Office Scotland (GROS). While more recent population data is available from GROS, the mid 2007 SAPE (Small Area Population Estimates) are used here for continuity with the data used in SIMD 2009 (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation). The information is available at data zone level. The 6505 data zones in Scotland have been created by combining 2001 Census output areas and nest within local authority boundaries. Data zones have populations of between 500 and 1,000 household residents and some effort has been made to respect physical boundaries. The peninsula is split into five data zones, one of which only contains the settlement of Rosneath (data zone S01000780). The largest data zone, while covering much of the peninsula also includes the settlement of Clynder (S01000792). The other three data zones (S01000760, S01000761, and S01000783) cover the rest of the peninsula and each contain part of the villages of Kilcreggan, Cove, and Ardpeaton. As shown in the Figure 1, data zone S01000761 stretches from the southern edge of Rosneath round to Kilcreggan, data zone S01000760 covers only the village of Kilcreggan and data zone S01000753 reaches from the northern edge of Kilcreggan up to Ardpeaton. 8 Figure 1: Datazones on the Rosneath Peninsula The population of the three data zones that contain the villages of Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton in 2007 was 1588. This covers a much larger area than the villages themselves; however, this area will also contain individuals who will benefit from the community plan. Therefore looking at the detailed data zone information for the larger area may provide a more accurate representation of the current demographics of the area to be covered by the Community Action Plan. The Table 1 below shows the population breakdown for each of the three data zones in the Kilcreggan peninsula and for the area as a whole (excluding the Rosneath and Clynder data zones) in comparison to the Argyll and Bute and Scotland figures. While there is a lower proportion of under 16s in the Peninsula West area than in both Argyll and Bute and Scotland, the proportion of 16-19 year olds in the population is much greater. Across the three data zones that comprise the Peninsula west area, 16 – 19 year olds account for 5.35% of the area, higher than the 4.82% and 5.13% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. In one of the areas, 16 19 year olds account for 6.67% of the population, 38% higher than Argyll and Bute and 30% higher than in Scotland as a whole. Across the Peninsula West area, residents of pensionable age account for over 25% of the total population, higher than the 24% and 19% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. In one of the data zones (towards the South East of Kilcreggan), pensioners account for almost 30% of all residents in the area. 29.7% of all households in the Peninsula West area contain dependent children, slightly higher than the 26.8% and 28.2% rate of household with dependent children in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. 9 S01000760 S01000761 S01000783 Kilcreggan SE Kilcreggan Cove/Ardpeaton All three datazones Argyll and Bute Scotland Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Female 35 7.13% 41 6.81% 39 7.88% 115 7.24% 7,634 8.36% 447,656 8.70% Male 43 8.76% 41 6.81% 36 7.27% 120 7.56% 7,780 8.52% 469,295 9.12% Total 78 15.89% 82 13.62% 75 15.15% 235 14.80% 15,414 16.87% 916,951 17.82% Female 15 3.05% 11 1.83% 20 4.04% 46 2.90% 2,029 2.22% 128,046 2.49% Male 12 2.44% 14 2.33% 13 2.63% 39 2.46% 2,371 2.60% 135,910 2.64% 16 - 19 Total 27 5.50% 25 4.15% 33 6.67% 85 5.35% 4,400 4.82% 5.13% 20 - 59 Female 139 28.31% 146 24.25% 113 22.83% 398 25.06% 22,313 24.43% 20 - 64 Male 155 31.57% 171 28.41% 144 29.09% 470 29.60% 29.87% WA Total 294 59.88% 317 52.66% 257 51.92% 868 54.66% 27,289 49,60 2 54.30% 263,956 1,436,41 6 1,526,22 0 2,962,63 6 60> Female 61 12.42% 103 17.11% 81 16.36% 245 15.43% 13,870 15.18% 646,483 12.57% Male 31 6.31% 75 12.46% 49 9.90% 155 9.76% 8,064 8.83% 6.88% Total 92 18.74% 178 29.57% 130 26.26% 400 25.19% 24.01% Female 250 50.92% 301 50.00% 253 51.11% 804 50.63% 21,934 45,84 6 Male 241 49.08% 301 50.00% 242 48.89% 784 49.37% 45,504 49.81% Total 491 100.00% 602 100.00% 495 100.00% 1588 100.00% 91,350 100.00% 354,174 1,000,65 7 2,658,60 1 2,485,59 9 5,144,20 0 0 -15 65> Pensio ners All ages Table 1: Population figures for the Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and surrounding area (SAPE 2007) 50.19% 27.92% 29.67% 57.59% 19.45% 51.68% 48.32% 100.00% This table shows that as a whole the Kilcreggan, Cove, and Ardpeaton area has a lower proportion of younger people and an ageing population compared to Scotland, which is similar to, though to a slightly less extent, than the Argyll and Bute local authority area. Between 2001 and 2009 the overall population of the Peninsula West area has declined by almost 4% with the population of children (those aged 16 and under) declining by almost a quarter (23.1%). The working age population also declined by 7%, with only a rise in the pensioner population of almost 24% counteracting these population reductions. In the Kilcreggan data zone the number of pensioners increased by 45% between 2001 and 2009 while the number of children decreased by almost 30% in the same period. 2001 2009 % Change Between 2001 and 2009 S01000760 572 501 -12.41% S01000761 608 614 0.99% S01000783 506 506 0.00% 1686 1621 -3.86% S01000760 130 93 -28.46% S01000761 97 79 -18.56% S01000783 89 71 -20.22% Total 316 243 -23.10% S01000760 371 305 -17.79% S01000761 346 348 0.58% S01000783 306 296 -3.27% Total 1023 949 -7.23% S01000760 71 103 45.07% S01000761 165 187 13.33% S01000783 111 139 25.23% Total 347 429 23.63% Population Total Children Working Age Pensionable Age Table 2: Change in demographics of the Peninsula West area between 2001 and 2009 (Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics) 4.3 MULTIPLE DEPRIVATION The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) was released on 29 October 2009 and measures the relative level of deprivation in each data zone in Scotland by ranking each of the 6505 data zones in Scotland according to the level of deprivation they display. Deprivation is calculated using indicators in the domains of income, employment, health, education, skills and training, geographic access to services, housing and crime. The data zones are then assigned a number between 1 and 6505 according to how relatively deprived the area is overall and in each of the seven domains. The lower the rank (or percentage out of 6505) of the data zone, the more deprived it is, with the areas in the 15% most deprived classed as the worst off in Scotland. This is a relative measure so there is always a number 1 (the most deprived) and a number 6505 (the least deprived area in Scotland). All the data used is the most up-to-date that was available at the time the index was constructed. In most cases this is from 2007 and 2008 but some older data was used where nothing more recent was available. While the economic situation has changed, it is still a valid picture of the distribution of deprivation. Investigations were carried out to look at the impact of including more recent unemployment data in the Index but the effect on the overall distribution was negligible. SIMD 2009 Rank Data zone S01000760 60.48% Kilcreggan S01000761 56.83% SE Kilcreggan S01000783 61.91% Cove/Ardpeaton Housing domain rank 2004, 2006 & 2009 Geographic Access domain 2009 rank SIMD Crime 2009 rank Income domain 2009 rank Employment domain 2009 rank Health domain 2009 rank Education, Skills and Training domain 2009 rank 70.22% 59.05% 74.37% 71.51% 56.97% 5.49% 84.61% 67.73% 60.22% 76.43% 62.01% 62.34% 4.12% 70.90% 81.64% 59.92% 90.22% 76.79% 36.03% 2.43% 84.83% Table 3: SIMD percentages for the Peninsula area This table shows that for the majority of the domains, all three data zones are in the 50% least deprived data zones in Scotland. The exceptions to this are the housing domain where one of the data zones (S01000783) is just out with the third most deprived in Scotland. However, all three of the data zones are very relatively deprived for the geographic access domain. The ScotPHO also provides statistics at the Intermediately Zone level, which can help build up a picture of the Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton area. Despite higher proportions of pensioners in the population than in Scotland, the rates of lone pensioner households and pensioners claiming pension credit are lower than the national average. The crime rate and level of assault victims in the area are also much lower than the Argyll and Bute and Scotland rates, which backs up the relatively high SIMD crime rank shown above, suggesting this is not a high crime area. 4.3.1 Geographic Access The geographic access domain is calculated by measuring the drive and public transport times between central areas in each data zone and selected core services. Table 4 shows these indicators and the travel times for each data zone compared to the averages for Argyll and Bute and Scotland. Datazone(s) 12 Datazone(s) S01000760 Kilcreggan S01000761 SE Kilcreggan S01000783 Cove/Ardpeaton Argyll & Bute Scotland Drive time to GP 2009 (mins) Drive time to Petrol Station 2009 (mins) Drive time to Post Office 2009 (mins) Drive time to Primary School 2009 (mins) Drive time to Secondary School 2009 (mins) Drive time to shopping facilities 2009 (mins) Public transport travel time to GP 2009 (mins) Public transport travel time to Post Office 2009 (mins) 2.84 15.05 4 0.44 22.81 20.32 11.54 10.37 33.71 4.9 15.81 6.2 1.91 22.99 20.65 9.62 9.40 26.38 6.2 14.57 4.55 2.56 23.32 22.28 18.74 9.71 45.42 4.80 1.71 5.14 1.94 3.23 1.25 2.03 0.96 9.42 2.79 9.01 3.03 18.78 11.30 12.97 9.41 27.10 15.08 Table 4: Travel times in each data zone compared to Argyll and Bute and Scotland This table shows that from each data zone the majority of the drive and public transport times to key services is much higher than in Scotland and occasionally in the rest of Argyll and Bute as well. Each of the three data zones in the Peninsula West area is in the 6% most deprived nationally for geographic access to services, with one area (from Cove to Ardpeaton) the 158th most deprived data zone in Scotland in terms of access to services. 81% of households in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area have at least one car, while 29% contain two or more. This is much higher than 72% of households in Argyll and Bute as a whole with access to a car with 22% containing two or more. In addition, 43% of those from the Kilcreggan area who are in employment travel to work by car or van, highlighting issues faced with public transport in the area (Census, 2001). 4.3.2 Labour Market The percentage of the population of the three datazones that cover the Kilcreggan, Cove and Ardpeaton areas that receive key out of work benefits is approximately 8.4%. This is much lower than the 11.6% in Argyll and Bute and the 14.6% of the population of Scotland as a whole. For the two data zones immediately surrounding Kilcreggan and up the coast to Ardpeaton, this percentage reduces to 7% of the population receiving these benefits in February 2010 (NOMIS, 2010). Across all three of the data zones covered by this plan only 7.3% of the population aged between 16 and 24 are receiving benefits; lower than the 10.9% and 13.3% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. However, in the Kilcreggan data zone (S01000760) 10 of the 44 (23.8%) people aged between 16 and 24 are claiming key out of work benefits. According to the 2001 census, 479 working aged people are working or studying within the Peninsula area, 23.4% of whom are self employed. 30% of economically active residents that both live and work in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area are self employed (Census, 2001). This is much higher than the 20% rate in Argyll and Bute and the 13% of self employed residents in Scotland as a whole. However, between 2006 and 2007, the total stock of businesses registered for VAT for the whole of Argyll and Bute increased by less than 1% compared to an increase of over 3.5% across Scotland as a whole. 13 Public transport travel time to shopping facilities 2009 (mins) Of the 1257 economically active people resident in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area, 67% leave the area for work or study with only 27% working in the area (Census, 2001). 71% of those that leave the Argyll and Bute Council area for work travel over 20km to access their employment each day and are probably employed in Inverclyde or Glasgow. 56% of the 581 parents in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area are part of a couple with dependent children and both working (Census, 2001). 4.3.3 Education, Skills and Training In 2008 there was a school roll of 85 in Kilcreggan Primary School and 89 in Rosneath Primary School. Less than 5% of the pupils at Kilcreggan Primary School are registered for free school meals, which is lower than the 10.5% across Argyll and Bute. 4.3.4 Health The Table 5 below shows the health rates that make up the SIMD 2009 Health indicator for the Peninsula West data zones compared to the averages across Argyll and Bute and throughout Scotland. However there are examples of ill health in the area, notably in data zone S01000760 (Kilcreggan) which has a standardised mortality ratio of 119, much higher than the Scottish average of 100. Overall across the Peninsula West area there are reasonably good levels of health, however, the data zone surrounding Kilcreggan has a higher standardised mortality rate than regionally at 19% higher than expected compared to 10% lower than expected in Argyll and Bute (SIMD, 2009). The average standardised mortality ratio across the Peninsula West area is 5% lower than expected but still represents a higher mortality rate than across the whole of Argyll and Bute. Data Zone S01000760 Kilcreggan S01000761 SE Kilcreggan S01000783 Cove/Ardpeaton A+B averages National Averages Hospital Episodes Related to Alcohol use(ISD, 20042007)3 Hospital episodes related to drug use (ISD, 20042007)4 Proportion of live singleton births of low birth weight (ISD, 20042007) Estimate of the proportion of population being prescribed drugs for anxiety or depression or psychosis (ISD, 2007)6 Standardised Mortality Ratio (ISD, 20042007) Comparative Illness Factor (DWP, 2008)2 Emergency admissions to hospital (ISD, 20042007)5 119 74 79 0 0 0.09 0.09 89 77 62 38 0 0 0.09 76 52 56 18 0 0 0.09 90.21 81.67 97.16 112.74 51.08 0.06 0.08 100 102.17 100 100 100 0.06 0.09 Table 5: Health Domains in each data zone compared to Argyll and Bute and Scotland Further health data is also available from the Scottish Public Health Observatory (ScotPHO), however, this data is only available at a larger level Intermediary Zones (IZ). Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and 14 Peaton are all contained within the one IZ - Garelochhead - which also covers the villages of Rosneath and Garelochhead and surrounding areas as shown in Figure 2. Figure 4: Garelochhead Intermediary Zone Despite the large coverage of this data, the statistics provided still present us with an indication of the levels and types of ill health faced by the Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton area. Overall, the life expectancy for both males (76.4) and females (80.9) is higher than both the Argyll and Bute (75.3 for males and 80.2 for females) and Scottish (73.9 for males and 79.1 for females) averages. However, the rate of alcohol related deaths and early deaths from heart attacks in under 75s are both also above the Argyll and Bute and Scottish averages. In addition, the percentage of smokers (40.7%) is also much higher than the Argyll and Bute (26.1%) and Scotland (27.3%) and is the worst smoking rate across the whole of the Argyll and Bute area. 4.3.5 House Prices The average house price in the Kilcreggan data zone increased by 125% between 2001 and 2009, much higher than the 100% and 103% rise in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. The mean house price difference between Kilcreggan and the rest of Argyll and Bute in 2001 was £31,032 while it increased to £89,072 in 2009. House sales, mean price : 2001 (£) House sales, mean price : 2009 (£) % Change Between 2001 and 2009 S01000760 Kilcreggan 107,205 241,500 125.27% S01000761 SE Kilcreggan S01000783 Cove/Ardpeaton 81,050 169,096 108.63% 88,212 133,563 51.41% 76,173 152,428 100.11% Data Zone Argyll & Bute 15 Scotland 78,220 159,075 103.37% Table 6: Average house price in each data zone compared to Argyll and Bute and Scotland (Registers of Scotland) The average cost of houses sold in the Peninsula West area across the last 12 months was £192,251.88 (April 2010 - March 2011). Only 10 out of the 32 properties sold went for less than £100,000, making the area difficult for first time buyers and those on low incomes to access (Registers of Scotland House Price Search). 5.0 POLICY CONTEXT SUMMARY In order to develop the policy context for the Community Action Plan, a number of existing national and local government policies were researched. They are: NATIONAL POLICIES Scottish Government Purpose, Strategic Objectives and National Outcomes Government Economic Strategy The Scottish Economic Recovery Plan - Update from 3rd March 2010 Community Learning and Development Strategy Skills for Scotland: A Lifelong Skills Strategy All Our Futures: Planning for a Scotland with an Ageing Population Enterprising Third Sector: Action Plan 2008-2011 Scottish Community Empowerment Action Plan: Celebrating Success, Inspiring Change LOCAL POLICIES Argyll and Bute Structure Plan and Local Plan Argyll and Bute Single Outcome Agreement The Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 Argyll and Bute Council Corporate Plan 2010 – 2013 and beyond Argyll and Bute Council Equality and Diversity Scheme 2009 – 2012 Argyll and Bute’s Integrated Children’s Services Plan 2009 – 2012 Argyll and Bute’s Older Persons Charter 2008-10 Community Safety Strategy 2009-2012 Antisocial Behaviour Strategy 2005-2008 Argyll and Bute Local Transport Strategy 2007-2010: Moving Forward Argyll and Bute Local Housing Strategy 2004 -2009 Argyll and Bute Woodlands and Forestry Strategy Argyll & Bute Community Planning Partnership’s Community Engagement Strategy The policy context section found that by developing the economy of the local area, encouraging community action and trying to reverse population decline, the Community Action Plan as a whole contributes to the visions of the Scottish Government and Argyll and Bute Council. In addition, each individual project set out in this plan can contribute towards specific policies of the relevant departments. Both the Scottish Government and Argyll and Bute Council are keen to build lifelong learning strategies, provide for an elderly population, ensure children and young people receive high quality activities and facilities, develop local transport networks, provide additional affordable housing and engage local communities in determining their own needs and ways to tackle these. 16 Any projects developed by the Trust or its partners should aim to contribute to one of the identified priorities of the local or national government. This could enhance the prospects of the Trust when applying for funding and in negotiating with the local council and partner organisations to progress the projects. 5.1 NATIONAL POLICIES 5.1.1 Scottish Government Purpose, Strategic Objectives and National Outcomes The overriding purpose to which all the work of the Scottish Government and its partners is aimed at is: “To focus the Government and public services on creating a more successful country, with opportunities for all of Scotland to flourish, through increasing sustainable economic growth.” Therefore all projects must show how they can contribute to the achievement of this purpose. In May 2007 the Scottish Government streamlined the resources of government to enable them to focus on increasing the success of the country and meeting the purpose. This was organised around five strategic objectives that describe where the Scottish Government and others should focus their actions. There are 15 national outcomes which describe what the Government wants to achieve over the next 10 years. The strategic objectives are: Wealthier and Fairer – enable businesses to increase their wealth and more people to share fairly in that wealth Safer and Stronger – help local communities to flourish, becoming stronger, safer places to live, offering improved opportunities and a better quality of life Healthier – help people to sustain and improve their health, especially in disadvantaged communities, ensuring better local and faster access to health care Smarter – expand opportunities for Scots to succeed from nurture through to lifelong learning ensuring higher and more widely shared achievements Greener – improve Scotland’s natural and built environment and the sustainable use and enjoyment of it The national outcomes are: We live in a Scotland that is the most attractive place for doing business in Europe. We realise our full economic potential with more and better employment opportunities for our people. We are better educated, more skilled and more successful, renowned for our research and innovation. Our young people are successful learners, confident individuals, effective contributors and responsible citizens. Our children have the best start in life and are ready to succeed. We live longer, healthier lives. We have tackled the significant inequalities in Scottish society. We have improved the life chances for children, young people and families at risk. We live our lives safe from crime, disorder and danger. We live in well-designed, sustainable places where we are able to access the amenities and services we need. We have strong, resilient and supportive communities where people take responsibility for their own actions and how they affect others. 17 We value and enjoy our built and natural environment and protect it and enhance it for future generations. We take pride and strong, fair and inclusive national identity. We reduce the local and global environmental impact of our consumption and production. Our public services are high quality, continually improving, efficient and responsive to local people’s needs. 5.1.2 Government Economic Strategy This strategy sets out how the Scottish Government will work with businesses and individuals to achieve the purpose shown above. Five strategic priorities have been set out to achieve the aim of economic growth and a strong, successful Scotland: Learning, skills and well being Supportive business environment Infrastructure development and place Effective government Equity A number of key approaches have been defined in relation to each strategic priority. The most relevant strategic priorities to this project and their related key approaches are: Learning, Skills and Well-being A focus on giving every child a strong start in life A focus on school education enabling all our young people to succeed and gain the skills they will require as individuals and to contribute to the wider economy A supply of education and skills which is responsive to, and aligned with, actions to boost demand An approach to health and well-being that ensures all Scots enjoy the right level of physical and mental health to give them the opportunity to maximise their potential The creation of the conditions for talented people to live, work and remain in Scotland Supportive Business Environment Responsive and focused enterprise support to increase the number of highly successful, competitive businesses Targeted support to business in the pursuit of opportunities outside of Scotland and the development of internationally competitive firms A broader approach to business innovation in Scotland that moves beyond viewing innovation as the domain of science and technology alone A clear focus on strengthening the link between Scotland’s research base and business innovation and addressing low levels of business R&D Equity To provide the opportunities – and incentives – for all to contribute to Scotland’s sustainable economic growth To accord greater priority to achieving more balanced growth across Scotland, to give all across Scotland the chance to succeed To promote economic growth and environmental quality and responsibility as mutually advancing 5.1.3 The Scottish Economic Recovery Plan - Update from 3rd March 2010 This plan aims to stimulate lasting improvements in Scotland’s long-term economic performance by concentrating effort on three broad areas: Investing in innovation and industries of the future 18 Strengthening education and skills Supporting jobs and communities 5.1.4 Community Learning and Development Strategy Community Learning and Development (CLD) is seen as a key tool in delivering the Scottish Government’s commitment to social justice. This strategy establishes that CLD capacity should be targeted towards activities aimed at closing the opportunity gap, achieving social justice and encouraging community regeneration and outlines three national priorities to achieve these: Achievement through learning for adults - raising standards of achievement in learning for adults through community-based lifelong learning opportunities incorporating the core skills of literacy, numeracy, communications, working with others, problem-solving and information communications technology (ICT) Achievement through learning for young people - engaging with young people to facilitate their personal, social and educational development and enable them to gain a voice, influence and a place in society Achievement through building community capacity - building community capacity and influence by enabling people to develop the confidence, understanding and skills required to influence decision making and service delivery These priorities should be reflected in the CLD strategies and action plans developed and delivered by community planning partners. 5.1.5 Skills for Scotland: A Lifelong Skills Strategy Through the Lifelong Skills Strategy the Scottish Government set out a vision for a smarter Scotland with a globally competitive economy based on high value jobs, with progressive and innovative business leadership. The four key parts of this vision are: People can work in teams, are creative and enterprising and hungry to continually learn new skills. They expect to realise their aspirations and are equipped to achieve their potential in a constantly changing world. People are motivated to contribute to Scotland’s future and are confident that they can do so. People are entrepreneurial and innovative, small businesses are encouraged to grow and there is strong, coherent support for businesses of all sizes. Migrant workers and overseas students play a valuable role in an expanded workforce and economy. Employers improve productivity by investing in their own staff and are able to access a skilled workforce that is increasingly literate and numerate with good ICT and problem solving skills. Learning and training providers work as one system and thanks to wider use of technology and elearning, barriers of geography and rurality have been reduced. 5.1.6 All Our Futures: Planning for a Scotland with an Ageing Population 23% of the population of the areas covered by this Community Action Plan are of pensionable age or above, therefore it is useful to look at strategies aimed specifically at this demographic. This strategy, published in 2007 by the current administration, has three basic premises to ensure the needs of an ageing population are met: Older people are contributors to life in Scotland There are barriers which need to be broken down between generations Services should be in place to ensure that people can live life to the full as they grow older. A new Community Action Plan for the Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton area can contribute to the achievement of these priorities by providing the facilities/services/activities that cater both 19 specifically for older people and/or encourage intergenerational cooperation. To achieve this, six priority areas for action were identified: Improving opportunities and removing barriers Forging better links between the generations Improving and maintaining health and well being Improving care, support and protection for older people Developing housing, transport and planning services Offering learning opportunities throughout life 5.1.7 Enterprising Third Sector: Action Plan 2008-2011 The aim of this action plan is to encourage a culture of enterprise throughout the third sector in order to make Scotland a world leader in the development of an enterprising third sector. The document sets out seven objectives to enable the achievement of this goal: Opening markets to an enterprising third sector Investing more intelligently Promoting social entrepreneurship Investing in skills, learning and leadership across the third sector Providing support for business growth Raising the profile of enterprise in the third sector Developing the evidence base – on the third sector in Scotland 5.1.8 Scottish Community Empowerment Action Plan: Celebrating Success: Inspiring Change This action plan reinforces the Scottish Government’s commitment to community empowerment which they define as: “Community empowerment is a process where people work together to make change happen in their communities by having more power and influence over what matters to them.” By producing a Community Action Plan to take the development of the Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton areas forward, the community council is already contributing towards empowering the local community. The Community Action Plan process will also allow local residents to have a say in the future of the area and encourage them to get involved with any future developments. As well as contributing to the achievement of national policies, this Community Action Plan and any resulting actions can also contribute towards Argyll and Bute Council’s vision for the local area. 5.2 LOCAL POLICIES 5.2.1 Argyll and Bute Structure Plan and Local Plan The Argyll and Bute Structure Plan provides a strategic land use framework up to 2012, which has guided the preparation of the Argyll and Bute Local Plan. This Local Plan has a 5-year plan-period and is to replace all previous local plans in Argyll and Bute with the exception of the Loch Lomond Local (Subject) Plan 1986. Together the Argyll and Bute Structure Plan November 2002 and the Argyll and Bute Local Plan will be known as the Development Plan. The Structure Plan sets out economic, social and environmental objectives to guide an investment strategy for Argyll and Bute. These objectives are carried over as the main objectives of the Argyll and Bute Local Plan. Economic and Social Objectives 20 to improve economic competitiveness and the relatively poor economic performance of Argyll and Bute as a whole to enhance the economic and social prospects of the geographically diverse local communities in Argyll and Bute to promote appropriate responses to the variety of challenging economic, transport-related and planning circumstances facing these local communities to treat the rich natural and historic environment of Argyll and Bute as a not fully realised economic asset which, if safeguarded and enhanced, can stimulate further investment and increased economic activity Environmental Objectives to safeguard the diverse and high quality natural and built heritage resources, including the abundant landward and maritime biodiversity of Argyll and Bute to reinforce the strength of protection given to the European and national statutorily protected nature conservation sites, habitats, species and built heritage sites, with which Argyll and Bute is particularly richly endowed to enhance and invest in the quality of the natural and built environment and to engage development more effectively with this enhancement process to encourage development of a scale, form, design and location appropriate to the character of the landscape and settlements of Argyll and Bute The Argyll and Bute Local Plan identifies five key underlying issues in the local authority area: An ageing population A continued reduction in the number of young economically active families A rapidly changing economic base with traditional industries in decline and suffering from globalisation and new industries emerging that are more dependent on accessibility, the inherent skills of the workforce and a high quality environment and the loss of local retail outlets The need for a significant investment in public services infrastructure To reduce and ameliorate the effects of peripherality – by encouraging the expansion of local facilities throughout Argyll and Bute The specific policy within the Argyll and Bute Local Plan which addresses the improvement and/or development of new community facilities (Policy LP COM 1 - Community Facility Development) emphasises the council’s commitment to community facilities as ‘the social foundations on which many communities rely on’. This policy aims to encourage new services and facilities that support and enhance a community and help retain the local population in the face of a declining number of young economically active families. It stresses any new facilities or improvements to existing facilities must be in keeping with the character of the town and surrounding area. 5.2.2 Argyll and Bute Single Outcome Agreement The Single Outcome Agreement objectives for Argyll and Bute are linked to each of the fifteen national outcomes outlined above, with a number of local outcomes contributing towards the achievement of each national outcome in the Argyll and Bute area. These local outcomes are formed from the statements set out in the Community Action Plan. 5.2.3 The Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 The Argyll and Bute Community Plan was produced by the Argyll and Bute Community Planning Partnership. It aims to establish Argyll and Bute as a ‘leading rural area’ through the achievement of three visions: outstanding environment, vibrant communities and forward looking communities, with associated statements: 21 Vibrant Communities safe supportive communities with positive culture and sense of pride in the area well balanced demographically with young people choosing to stay or move to the area vibrant local economy that is based on core attributes of the area, flexible and open to new opportunities well connected economically and socially a sense of history with a view to the future high quality public services and leisure/community facilities that attract people to settle in Argyll and Bute Outstanding Environment high quality environment that is valued, recognised and protected the environment is respected as a valued asset that can provide sustainable opportunities for business a high quality image and identity that is recognised and appreciated globally an area that is accessible, yet retains its remote character Forward Looking Communities communities that are culturally rich with a desire to excel proactive communities where local people and organisations look for and create opportunities dynamic public services with more delivery of high quality ‘professional’ services from Argyll and Bute partnership working across all sectors to coordinate developments, promote Argyll and Bute and remove constraints communities that encourage lifelong learning Within these visions there are five key goals of the Community Planning Partnership: town centre and waterfront regeneration - Campbeltown, Helensburgh, Oban, Rothesay and Dunoon (CHORD) improvement to the strategic transport network vulnerable areas and South Kintyre in particular modernising social and healthcare services reducing alcohol and drugs related disorder and crime 5.2.4 Argyll and Bute Council Corporate Plan 2010 – 2013 and beyond The corporate plan sets out strategic objectives for the council’s work, based on the three visions outlined in the Community Plan: Environment – promoting our cultural, social and natural heritage and protecting our unique area Social Change – affecting demographic change, caring for vulnerable people and lifelong learning Economy – creating an attractive, well connected, modern economy Organisational Development – continuous improvement, innovation and culture change The Corporate Plan also outlined a number of areas in which they wish to work in partnership with others to develop. The most relevant to the Community Action Plan are: Developing the Economy Developing Argyll and Bute as a quality destination, creating higher quality jobs and extending the tourism season Rejuvenation of main towns to attract people and businesses to Argyll and Bute Bring high value jobs and careers to rural areas 22 Support for agriculture, forestry, aquaculture and fishing as important sectors in the local economy Remote and Island Communities Development and support for vocational education so that young people can access training and employment without leaving the area Improved methods to identify and provide support for excluded or deprived groups 5.2.5 Argyll and Bute Council Equality and Diversity Scheme 2009 – 2012 The Council’s Equality and Diversity Scheme is underpinned by the key principles from Argyll and Bute’s Corporate Plan and aims to ensure that: no one is disadvantaged because of their race or ethnic origin, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation or religion and belief the differences between people are valued and good relations between groups are promoted people are treated fairly and with equal respect informed assessments are made on the impact of policies and services people are involved in the decisions that affect them and encouraged to participate in public life. 3.2.6 Argyll and Bute’s Integrated Children’s Services Plan 2009 – 2012 The vision of the Integrated Children’s Services Plan for Argyll and Bute: “We are committed to working with our communities to develop and improve quality of life and opportunity for all of our children, young people and their families” In order to achieve this vision, the department strives to ensure that: All partner agencies work collaboratively and inclusively to benefit Argyll and Bute’s children and young people. Children, young people and their families/carers receive high quality services when required 5.2.7 Argyll and Bute’s Older Persons Charter 2008-10 The purpose of this charter is to set out how Argyll and Bute Council, and its partner agencies, will work towards ensuring the needs of older people in the area are met. In order to achieve this vision, the document aims to: Make Argyll and Bute a place where older people can live positive, contributing lives as valued citizens Ensure that services in Argyll and Bute have a positive approach to older people Enable as many older people as possible to participate in inclusive, mainstream activities Address effectively the wider issues most commonly cited by older people as problematic – transport, income levels, advice and information, community and road safety and the local environment Ensure equity of access to care services throughout the area Enable vulnerable older people to remain supported in their own homes for as long as possible with a good quality of life and respecting individual choices Ensure the welfare and continuing social inclusion of those living in care homes 5.2.8 Community Safety Strategy 2009-2012 This Strategy outlines five priorities for the five locally based community Safety Partnerships across the Argyll and Bute Council area: Ensuring neighbourhoods and towns are safe from violence, antisocial behaviour and disorder Tackling vandalism and criminal damage within communities and towns and ensuring the environment is respected and valued 23 Improving road safety and promoting safe driving Improving water safety Engaging residents in developing safe neighbourhoods and providing public reassurance about personal safety 5.2.9 Antisocial Behaviour Strategy 2005-2008 This Strategy reports that in the Kilcreggan and Cove area: “Occasional problems arise with young people, under 18 years of age, from outside the area causing trouble. A small number of vandalism and alcohol related offences are reported.” (p.22) The strategy has four overarching themes. These are: To promote safe and attractive communities in which people want to live To reduce incidents of antisocial behaviour To engage with local communities to ensure they have an effective input to the development and implementation of strategy and local initiatives To achieve effective joint working between partners The strategic focus will be on: Diversion - to identify and provide a range of opportunities which are targeted at individuals and groups who engage in antisocial behaviour and to develop access, delivery and support structures to encourage targeted individuals and groups to participate in activities which divert them from conduct which constitutes antisocial behaviour Prevention - to work with partners to prevent the occurrence, reoccurrence or escalation of antisocial behaviour Enforcement - to provide a framework, processes and procedures to address incidents of antisocial behaviour and, where necessary, apply sanctions and enforcement measures available through antisocial behaviour legislation 5.2.10 Argyll and Bute Local Transport Strategy 2007-2010: Moving Forward The core vision for this Transport Strategy is to enable a vibrant Argyll and Bute through the achievement of five objectives: Encouraging a growing and sustainable economy in Argyll and Bute Improving people’s transport experience Managing the effect of transport on Argyll and Bute’s rich natural environment Improving accessibility for all our communities Improving journey safety and personal security for everyone in Argyll and Bute 5.2.11 Argyll and Bute Strategic Housing Investment Plan (SHIP) 2011-2016 The SHIP is intended to supplement the Local Housing Strategy and outlines the overall housing development priorities for the local authority area as well as identifying specific areas for investment. The main focus of the SHIP is on the provision of affordable housing to mitigate increasing housing need in the Argyll and Bute area. It is predicted that the Helensburgh and Lomond area will face the largest growth in unmet need in Argyll and Bute and it is therefore planned to develop 303 new build units across Argyll and Bute, 48 (16%) of which would be in Helensburgh and Lomond. However, the Helensburgh and Lomond area is not prioritised for future housing development within the five year period of the SHIP and due to further resource constraints on the SHIP programme, these developments may not take place. On the basis of a housing needs and demand assessment completed in 2010, the SHIP highlights that housing development should primarily be general needs housing and smaller sized units (one and two 24 bedroom). The SHIP also highlights the problem of in-migration to Argyll and Bute as pushing up house prices and deterring local residents from accessing the housing market and restricting the selfcontainment of the area. Sites for housing development are prioritised by Argyll and Bute Council on the basis of their contribution to addressing overall housing need, their contribution to regeneration or other policy initiatives to support community growth and sustainability and the potential for barriers to development to arise through land ownership issues and inadequate development opportunities. Given the funding constraints imposed upon the local authority and the low levels of affordable house building predicted, the Trust could contribute to the aim of the SHIP and associated housing objectives outlined in the Local Housing Strategy by developing local affordable housing that meets the needs and demands identified in the SHIP and addresses rising housing need in the area. 5.2.12 Argyll and Bute Local Housing Strategy 2004 -2009 There are thirteen objectives set out in this strategy. The most potentially relevant to any community project are: Improve information and advice services Address issues of fuel poverty and energy efficiency Build strong, safe and attractive communities Empower communities and increase community participation Support economic development Increase understanding of operation of housing system Increase understanding of particular needs groups Enable independent living for vulnerable people and those with particular needs Address issues of homelessness through implementation of the Argyll and Bute Homelessness Strategy 5.2.13 Argyll and Bute Woodlands and Forestry Strategy This strategy is currently still in draft form and at the consultation stage, however, it will allow us to see the priorities for Argyll and Bute in this area. The overall vision of the Woodlands and Forestry Strategy is: “The woodland and forests of Argyll and Bute will make a significant contribution to climate change mitigation, have significant levels of economic value retained locally, enhance biodiversity and environmental quality and support the further development of recreation opportunities for the benefit and well-being local people and visitors alike.” To meet this vision, the Argyll Islands Woodlands Partnership was created. The strategy also draws attention to the opportunities to expand community involvement in biodiversity, recreation, woodfuel and environmental education projects, building on good practice established by enterprises on Mull. 5.2.14 Argyll & Bute Community Planning Partnership’s Community Engagement Strategy This Strategy identifies four areas within which to prioritise action towards improving community engagement: Increase involvement of all communities particularly children and young people, disabled people, those from different ethnic groups as well as other under-represented groups in community planning processes at local level and around subjects they are interested in Build capacity of management, staff, community leaders and groups and individuals in community engagement Increase the coordination of our efforts in community engagement, sharing experiences, knowledge, skills, resources and funds 25 6.0 DEMAND ANALYSIS SUMMARY Three postal consultations were conducted in order to determine the priorities of the local community for projects to improve the Peninsula West area. These sought the opinions of individual households, community groups and local businesses. The surveys required respondents to rate their priorities in six areas: business and housing, transport, health and welfare, environment, employment and tourism, and community and recreation. A further face-to-face consultation with young people was undertaken by youth work staff during outreach sessions in Kilcreggan. This focussed on the priorities of the young people in relation to a potential new youth facility in the area. The individual households survey received responses from 28.5% of the adult population of Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton. The issues highlighted as top priorities for the area were affordable housing, availability of petrol, sheltered housing, improvement of foreshore, crèche facilities/after school club, and a young people’s place. Respondents also indicated other priority issues for the development of the Peninsula West area including public transport, support for young people, appearance of village generally, promoting tourism, tourist facilities, sports area and small business units: Twenty-five local community groups responded to a community groups survey. This found that the majority of the groups currently use Cove Burgh Hall and believed this to be adequate for their purposes. Financial support and advice on funding were highlighted as priorities to ensure the continued success of these groups. The community groups that responded to the survey also indicated a need for more advertising mechanisms on the peninsula by prioritising community notice boards and leaflets, publications or information stands. Eleven local businesses responded to local business survey. These businesses employed 53 staff between them and indicated they had no problems sourcing labour or services in the area. The survey found that respondents prioritised projects to provide additional information on potential grant funding sources for development initiatives, supply competitively priced fuel sourcing and improve the appearance of the village generally. Twenty young people aged between 10 and 16 from the Kilcreggan area completed a young people survey. The majority felt that there was not enough for young people to do in the area and almost all said they would utilise a new youth facility if one was developed. The young people highlighted that a young people’s place should include facilities such as a sports hall, cinema, café and games room and should involve activities like youth activities, keep-fit, music and dance. In addition, the young people felt that a young people’s place should also provide services such as careers/jobs advice, money/welfare rights advice and a youth drop in centre. From the four consultations, it was determined that the priorities for the area were for services to provide for the elderly, for young people and to halt the decline in population in the Peninsula West area. There was also concern regarding the general appearance of the area, in particular the overgrowth of knotweed along the foreshore and the community prioritised projects to tackle this. From the four consultations, it was determined that the priorities for the area were to provide services for both elderly and young people, as well as facilities and activities that will allow intergenerational interaction. The surveys also highlighted a desire to build on the existing community facilities in the area to ensure all residents are provided for and to halt the decline in population in the Peninsula West area. There was also concern regarding the general appearance of the area, in particular the overgrowth of knotweed along the foreshore, and the community prioritised projects to tackle this. The community also highlighted the importance of providing a local source of fuel on the Peninsula 26 and improving the economy of the area through increasing tourism. This would include projects to provide additional facilities/services to tourists, provide local business with the opportunity to grow in the tourism sector and host community festivals to attract visitors. 6.1 INDIVIDUAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS 6.1.1 Introduction Questionnaires were posted to all 1,268 adults in the Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton areas. A total of 361 questionnaires were returned, a response rate of 28.5%. Respondents were asked to indicate which of the four areas, or other, they were from. 65.4% of the completed questionnaire respondents came from Kilcreggan (236), 25.8% were from Cove (93), 8.86% from Peaton (4), Ardpeaton (7) and Other (21). This section will analyse the combined responses of all respondents. As the responses also vary by area, further sections will also analyse the responses from Kilcreggan, Cove, Peaton, Ardpeaton and Other individually. Gender As the graph 2 shows, there are more females than males among the survey respondents. This is overrepresentative of females who account for only 51% of the population of the area (SAPE, 2007). Age The age group represented the most among the respondents is 50-65 year olds, accounting for 33% of respondents but only 26% of the population of the area (SAPE, 2007). This is followed by over 65s and 40-49 year olds, meaning that respondents aged over 40 are over represented among the consultation responses. Conversely, there were only 8 of the 361 respondents (2.22%) aged under 21 and only 19 aged between 22-29, meaning the under 30 year old age groups were not represented in the responses. 6.1.2 Structure of Report The issues to be explored in the consultation questionnaire were grouped into 6 categories: transport issues, health and welfare issues, environmental issues, employment support issues, community and recreation issues, and business and housing issues. Throughout the survey, questions in each of these categories required respondents to prioritise 6 options by ranking them between 1 for highest priority down to 6 for their lowest priority. If all responses had been completed in this way, it would add up to the same amount of 1s, 2s etc as respondents to the survey and allow us to directly compare the number of respondents selecting each option at each priority level. However, a number of respondents did not correctly fill out these questions. The mistakes ranged from only ranking the options up to, for example, four then leaving the others blank to using each priority more than once, for example indicated every option was a priority option. This report has opted to analyse the total of all the responses regardless of how they were completed to ensure we do not exclude any respondents from the analysis. However, this results in differing numbers of selections for each number so that the number of options selected can outweigh or not add up to the total number of respondents. For example, for transport issues 361 respondents ranked 431 options as number one and only 277 as number five. In order to combat this, the responses to each question have been presented in two formats. Firstly, they have been presented in a bar graph showing the percentage of the total respondents that selected each option as one of their top three priorities (by entering 1, 2 or 3). This allows us to compare the options according to the percentage of respondents rating them as a top three priority. 27 This is followed by a breakdown of the total priority one selections, as a percentage of all the priority 1 selections made. This allows us to compare the options according to how often they were rated as priority one. 6.1.3 Peninsula West Transport Issues Respondents were asked to rank the relative importance of six transport issues to the area: availability of petrol, village parking, reducing traffic speed in villages, public transport, pavements and good walking and cycling links to village. Top Three Priorities The graph 4 shows the percentage of respondents selecting each option as one of their top three priority transport issues. The transport issue ranked as a top three priority by the most respondents from all areas (66%) was the availability of petrol in the Peninsula West. This was followed by public transport, selected as a top three priority by 62% of respondents. Pavements was also selected as a top three priority by over half the respondents (55%). Top Priority Availability of petrol was also selected the most often as the respondents’ top priority, with 164 of the 361 respondents indicating this was their number one priority. This was followed by public transport and then reducing traffic speeds in the villages. 6.1.4 Peninsula West Health and Welfare Issues In another question respondents were asked to rank health and welfare issues from one to six in terms of how important they felt the need for each one was. The options were: sheltered housing, care home, chiropodist, physiotherapist, befriending services for the elderly and support services for young people, e.g. job search. Top Three Priorities The graph 5 shows that the health and welfare issues selected as a top three priority by the most respondents were sheltered housing selected as 1, 2 or 3 by 68% of respondents. This was followed by support for young people and befriending for the elderly which were selected as a top three priority by 59% and 54% of respondents respectively. Top Priority A third of top priority selections by respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton or Other areas were for sheltered housing (120) followed by support for young people, selected by 106 respondents. Chiropodist and care home were selected as a top priority the least often, receiving less than 10% of all the number one selections. 6.1.5 Peninsula West Environmental Issues Respondents ranked the need they felt there was for six environment improvements to the area: improvement of foreshore and elimination of knotweed, provision of piers and slipways, community gardens and play areas, appearance of local village generally, natural/ local history visitor centre and garden services for the elderly. Top Three Priorities Improvement of the foreshore received the most top three priority selections (73%) followed by the appearance of the village generally (70%) and community gardens and play areas (59%). On the other hand, natural/local history visitor centre was selected as a top three priority by only 21% of respondents. 28 Top Priority Improvement of the foreshore received the highest proportion of the 1st priority selections with 116 respondents from all areas selecting this option as their top environmental priority for the Peninsula West area. This was followed by appearance of local village generally which was selected by 110 respondents as their number one priority. One the other hand, reflecting the graph 6 above, natural/local history visitor centre was selected as a 1st priority by the fewest respondents (only 18 out of 361). 6.1.6 Peninsula West Employment Support Issues Respondents were asked to rank employment issues from one to six in terms of how important they felt the need for each one was in the local area. The options were: small business administration and IT support, organised community events to promote tourism, money management advice, crèche facilities/after school care, heritage/architecture trail and improving business opportunities through tourism. Top Three Priorities The graph 7 shows that the employment issue rated as a top three priority by the most respondents was improving business opportunities through tourism, which was rated as 1, 2 or 3 by 62% of respondents. This was followed by crèche facilities/after school care and organised community events to promote tourism which were selected as a top three priority by 59% and 55% of respondents respectively. The option selected the least often as a top three priority was money management advice, rated as 1, 2 or 3 by only 20% of respondents from all areas. Top Priority The crèche facilities/after school care was selected by the most respondents (115 of 361 respondents) as their top priority employment issue for the area. This was followed by improving business opportunities through tourism and organised community events to promote tourism which were selected the second and third most often as the top priority employment issue. 6.1.7 Peninsula West Community and Recreational Issues Respondents were asked to rank the relative importance of six community and recreational issues to the local area. The options were: a young people’s place (e.g. youth café), sports hall, improvements to outdoor sports facilities, Rainbow Centre renovation in tandem with Burgh Hall, community IT facilities (e.g. printer and photocopier) and community information updates/newsletter. Top Three Priorities The graph 8 shows that four out of the six options were selected as a top three priority by over 50% of respondents. A place for young people, improvements to outdoor sports facilities, a sports hall and Rainbow Centre renovation were all selected as a top three priority by 69%, 67%, 65% and 51% of respondents from all areas respectively. Top Priority A young people’s place received the most top priority selections, with just over a quarter of all 1st priority selections for this option (114 respondents). This was followed by a sports hall, improvements to outdoor sports facilities and Rainbow Centre renovation which were all selected the next most often as the top priorities of around 80 respondents each. 6.1.8 Current Use of Community Facilities Respondents were asked to indicate how often they used a selection of community facilities in the local and wider area. These included Burgh Hall, the bowling club, play park, sailing club and scout hall. The table below shows that the Burgh Hall was used the most often by respondents while 75% of 29 respondents reported never using the Bowling Club and Scout Hall, making them the least utilised facilities. 13 respondents from all areas had never used any of the facilities suggested, while 76 of the 361respondents (21%) had only ever used Burgh Hall. Burgh Hall The largest proportion of respondents from all areas indicated they used Burgh Hall a few times a year, while over a quarter also reported using the hall weekly (101 respondents). Only 18 respondents from all areas indicated they never used Burgh Hall. Bowling Club The vast majority of respondents (267) reported never using the bowling club while only 20 use it a few times a year or more. Play Park The majority of respondents also reported never using the play park, although 10 respondents each reported using the facility weekly, fortnightly and monthly. Sailing Club The largest proportion of respondents indicated they never used the sailing club, although at less than a third of respondents, this facility is still used more often compared to others in this question. 13% or 46 reported using the hall on a weekly basis, making it the second most often used facility. Scout Hall The Scout hall was also selected as never being used by the majority of respondents (263 of 361). 18 respondents reported using the Scout hall on a weekly or fortnightly basis, however, 15% of respondents did not provide an answer to this question. 6.1.9 Peninsula West Business and Housing Development Issues Respondents were asked to rank the business and employment opportunities they would like to see developed in the Peninsula West villages. The options to be ranked between 1 (top priority) and 6 (lowest priority) were: affordable housing, small business units, tourist facilities/attractions, horticultural and related businesses, retail business and larger processing and industrial businesses. Top Three Priorities The graph 9 shows that affordable housing was selected as a top three priority by the majority of respondents from all areas (70%). This is followed by small business units and tourist facilities and attractions which were both selected as one of their top three priorities by 61% of respondents. Top Priority The option selected as the number one priority by the most respondents from all areas was affordable housing (selected by 179 of the 361 respondents). This was followed by tourist facilities/attractions and then small business units, 58 and 57 respondents respectively selecting these options as their top priority for the Peninsula West area. In contrast, larger processing and industrial businesses was only selected as the top priority by nine respondents to the questionnaire. 6.1.10 Type of Housing Respondents were asked to rank five forms of housing according to which they felt was most important to include in any future housing developments in the Peninsula West area. The options were: flats/apartments, two-bedroom houses, three-bedroom houses, four-bedroom houses and fivebedroom houses. 30 Top Three Priorities The graph 10 shows that both two and three bedroom houses were selected most often as a top three priority for respondents from all areas, by 84% and 83% respectively. Flats/apartments were also prioritised by 75% of respondents, while four and five bedroom houses were selected as a top three priority by only 18% (64 respondents) and 4% (16 respondents) respectively. Top Priority Flats/apartments received the highest proportion of all top priority selections, with 133 respondents selecting this housing option as most important for the Peninsula West area. This is followed by three bedroom houses (133 respondents) and two bedroom houses (96). On the other hand, only 13 respondents selected four bedroom houses as their top priority and only 8 respondents from all areas rated five bedroom houses as the most important housing type for the local area. 6.1.11 Most Important Local Issues Respondents were also asked to rank how important they felt the following issues were to the Peninsula West area: local transport, local health and welfare, local environment, local affordable housing, local community and recreation and local business and employment. Top Three Priorities The graph 11 shows that the local issues ranked as a top three priority by the most residents from all areas (61%) was local health and welfare. This was followed by local community and recreation, local affordable housing and local environment which were all selected as a top three priority by over 50% of respondents. Local transport and local business and employment received the lowest number of top three priority selections by 47% and 45% respectively of respondents from all areas. Top Priority The graph 12 shows that local health and welfare received the most 1st priority selections, with 98 respondents selecting this as their top priority for the Peninsula West area. This was followed by local affordable housing and local community and recreation, which were rated as the most important local issues by 87 and 86 respondents from all areas respectively. The issues receiving the least top priority selections were local environment then local business and employment. 6.1.12 Comparison of Areas This section will compare the responses from each area within the Peninsula West area: Kilcreggan, Cove and other (Peaton, Ardpeaton and other). For each question the options were rated 1-6 depending on how many respondents from each area selected them as a top three priority. In the graphs below, the larger the coloured section, the higher the priority that option was rated by the respondents from that area. This allows us to explore the areas where opinions differ between the areas in the Peninsula West. Peninsula West Transport Issues Public transport was selected as a top three priority by the most Cove respondents, while respondents from other areas selected reducing traffic speed in the villages most often as a top three priority. Availability of petrol was selected as a top three priority most by Kilcreggan respondents and therefore also the Peninsula West area as a whole. With the exception of village parking, which was rated as a top three priority the least times by respondents from every area, there are some slight differences between the top priorities across areas. A major difference between areas is in the level of importance given to reducing traffic speed in villages with respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas much more likely to rate this as a top three priority than in Cove and Kilcreggan. Similarly, good walking and cycling links to village were 31 also rated as a top three priority by respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas more often than those from Cove and Kilcreggan. On the other hand, availability of petrol and pavements varied in importance by respondents from different areas, with those from Peaton, Ardpeaton and Other areas less likely to select these options as a top three priority for the Peninsula West area. Peninsula West Health and Welfare Issues Support services for young people was selected as a top three priority by the highest percentage of respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and Other areas. However, respondents from Kilcreggan, Cove and the overall Peninsula West area selected sheltered housing most often as a top three priority. As shown on the graph 14, within the health and welfare question, the priorities of respondents from each of the three area groups vary slightly, but not to the extent seen in some other questions. Peninsula West Environmental Issues The prioritisation of environmental issues varied between the different area groups, with the largest percentage of respondents from Cove and Kilcreggan and the overall area selecting the improvement of the foreshore (including elimination of knotweed) as a top three priority, while respondents from the Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas prioritised community gardens and play areas. Respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas were also slightly more likely to select the provision of piers and slipways and slightly less likely to select the appearance of the village generally than respondents from both Kilcreggan and Cove. Peninsula West Employment Issues The graph 16 shows that there was quite a wide variation in the employment support priorities of respondents from each area. Crèche/after school facilities was selected as a top three priority most often by respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas. Cove respondents rated organised community events to promote tourism most often as a top three priority while the largest percentage of Kilcreggan respondents, and therefore of the overall area, selected improving business opportunities through tourism as one of their top three priorities. Cove respondents were less likely to select crèche facilities/after school and Kilcreggan respondents were less likely to select organised community events to promote tourism as a top three priority than respondents from other areas. Respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas selected improving business opportunities through tourism less often than in both Kilcreggan and Cove. Peninsula West Community and Recreation Issues As illustrated in the graph 17, there was no variation in the relative prioritisations of the community and recreation options between each area. In all areas a young people’s place was selected as a top three priority by the largest proportion of respondents, followed by improvements to outdoor sports facilities and sports hall. Peninsula West Business and Housing Issues Respondents from Kilcreggan and Cove selected affordable housing most often as a top three priority for the Peninsula West area. However, slightly more Peaton, Ardpeaton and other respondents selected tourist facilities/attractions as a top three priority, making this the highest prioritised business option for the Peaton, Ardpeaton and other area. Respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas were also slightly less likely to select small business units as a top three priority than respondents from Kilcreggan and Cove. On the other hand, retail business, horticultural and related business and tourist facilities/attractions were selected as a top three priority by a lower proportion of Kilcreggan and Cove respondents than respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas. 32 Type of Housing Respondents from Kilcreggan and Peaton, Ardpeaton and other areas, selected two bedroom houses most often as a top three priority housing type. The largest proportion of Cove respondents selected three bedroom houses as a top three priority for the Peninsula West area. Flats/apartments was selected by the third largest percentage of respondents from each area. Most Important Local Issues The local issues most important to respondents varied widely between areas in the Peninsula West. For both Kilcreggan and Cove, local health and welfare was selected as a top three priority by the largest percentage of respondents. However this was selected by only the fourth largest percentage of respondents from Peaton, Ardpeaton and other, while these respondents selected the local environment most often as a top three priority. This option was selected the second and third least often by respondents from Cove and Kilcreggan respectively. 6.2 COMMUNITY GROUP SURVEY A questionnaire was sent to 59 identified community groups in the Peninsula West area. A total of 25 groups responded; a response rate of 42%. This section analyses the responses to this consultation. 6.2.1 Type of Groups The groups/organisations that the survey was sent to were grouped into seven categories to show the types of groups/organisation operating in the area. The graph 21 illustrates the percentage of each type of group the survey was sent to compared to the percentage of groups that responded to the survey. This shows that groups concerned with providing services for elderly people and groups organised around arts/crafts/music/film and activities/interests are both well over represented among survey respondents. On the other hand, groups that exist for the promotion of a specific interest or entity and active groups (those involving sport) are under represented among the survey respondents. 6.2.2 Frequency of Group Meetings The graph 22 illustrates the frequency of groups meetings as a percentage of answers from all respondents and shows that the vast majority (two thirds) of respondent groups meet on a weekly basis. The respondents that selected ‘other’ met twice a year, between two and six times a year or did not indicate how often they met. 6.2.3 Size of Group Meetings Respondents were also asked to indicate how many people attended meetings of the group. The graph 23 shows that the largest proportion of groups that responded to the survey (7 responses) required space for between 10 and 20 members at each meeting. This was closely followed by respondents with less than ten members (6 groups) and 20 – 30 members (5 groups) attending each meeting. 6.2.4 Demographics of Group Members Area The graph 24 shows that over 70% of the groups that responded to this survey had members from Kilcreggan, followed by 64% with members from Cove. Very few Ardpeaton or other respondents were specifically mentioned as being involved in the groups, however, around a third of respondents reported group members from all or most of the areas. Age Range The graph 25 shows the ages of members of the groups that responded to this survey. This shows that over half the groups have members aged between 50-65 years old. Overall the age range of group 33 membership is very focused on over 40 year olds. However, 15% of groups indicated they had members aged under 17 while a further 10% indicated their membership covered all age groups. None of the respondent groups indicated that they had members aged between 17 and 29. This could be due to a lack of suitable groups to interest this age group or disengagement by residents of these ages with organised group activities. 6.2.5 Facilities Current Facilities The graph 26 shows the number of respondents indicating how often they used each of the suggested facilities. As can be seen, there are a large number of groups that did not provide an answer for every option. Three groups did not provide an answer to any of the options while the largest proportion (11 of the 25 respondent groups) only provided an indication of how often they used the Burgh Hall, leaving the other options blank. As a result of this Burgh Hall was reported as being used most often, with over a third of respondent groups using this facility on a weekly basis. Two of the groups had never used any of the suggested facilities while a further two had only ever used the Burgh Hall. Other Facilities Respondents were then asked which other areas they visited to use facilities. Only eight of the respondent groups left comments indicating which other facilities they utilised. Respondents’ comments included: Princess Louise Hall in Rosneath Meetings are held in members' houses Green space for fetes Kilcreggan Hotel Gibson Hall, Garelochhead Rosneath Rosneath school Youth Café State of facilities Respondents were asked if the current facilities used by their group/organisation were adequate for their purposes. Only a small minority of respondents (4 groups) indicated that their current facilities were not adequate, citing the expanding size of the group and the unsuitable facilities at the current venue. New Facilities – Overall Selections Respondents were asked to rate the top five facilities they felt their group/organisation would most benefit from. The graph 27 illustrates the number of groups selecting each option as one of their top five priorities. This shows that the options selected the most often as beneficial to the groups that responded to the survey were community notice board; leaflet, publication and information stand; lockable storage and community printer, scanner and photocopier. New Facilities - Top Priority The pie chart 28 illustrates the percentage breakdown of top priority selections amongst each of the options. This shows that a community notice board was selected by the most respondents as a facility that would benefit their group. Other Suggestions Respondents were also provided with space to make additional suggestions of potential facilities for the Peninsula West area that would benefit their group. The following 14 suggestions were provided: 34 Updated PCs Primary school Local radio Community online access, printer Computer access in the library at Cove Burgh Hall A sports and recreation building incorporating facilities such as a gym, indoor bowling area, exercise area, smaller games rooms Spotlights Buses not adequate Knotweed control and grass cutting Fitness and leisure club New youth facilities, new football pitch, poor swings More children 6.2.6 Finances Current Turnover Of the respondents that provided information on their annual financial turnover, the largest proportion indicated that they generated between £1,000 and £5,000 each year. This was followed by around a third of respondents who raised less than £1,000 annually. Financial Assistance Respondents were asked if they felt their group required any ongoing financial assistance in order to continue to run. The graph 30 illustrates the percentage of those that responded to the questionnaire replying each way. This shows that the majority of respondents did not feel their group requires ongoing financial assistance. Information and Advice However, the majority of respondents (57% of those that provided an answer to this question) did report that their group would benefit from additional information and advice regarding funding sources, as shown on the graph 31. 6.2.7 Support The respondents were asked to rank five types of support services according to which would be most beneficial to their group/organisation. However, not all respondents correctly completed this question (only four respondents accurately ranked each option between one and five), meaning the selections for each option do not add up to the total number of respondents, as they should. Given the low numbers correctly completing this question it would be inaccurate to only report these responses and therefore all the selections made are included in the graph 32 according to the number of respondents selecting each. This allows us to see which option got the most overall selections and also which was voted as a higher priority the most often. Overall Selections The graph 32 shows that by far the most often prioritised option, both overall and as a number one priority, was support with identifying potential funding sources. This was followed by help with completing funding applications and capacity building for new and existing members. On the other hand, providing information on Disclosure Scotland and updating existing constitutions were ranked as the options with the least benefit to the respondent groups, receiving no priority 1, 2 or 3 selections. Top priority 35 Of the respondents that completed this question and indicated a priority one preference (only 18 of the total 25 respondents), 67% ranked identifying potential funding sources as the most beneficial support for their group/organisation. Of the total respondents to this questionnaire, 48% (12 respondents) rated indentifying funding sources as their top priority, reinforcing the 48% of respondents who said they would benefit additional information and advice on funding in an earlier question. Other Suggestions Respondents were also provided with space to make additional suggestions of other services that they felt would benefit their group. Only two respondents provided answers, with one suggesting that external tutors were needed to provide educational classes and the other commenting that the groups would benefit from additional young members. 6.2.7 Local Issues The respondents were asked to rank local issues according to which they felt was most important to the Peninsula West area. However, not all respondents correctly completed this question (only 15 respondents accurately ranked each option between one and six), meaning the selections for each option do not add up to the total number of respondents, as they should. Given the relatively high number completing the question correctly, which allows a more accurate overview of the responses, two versions of each graph have been presented in this section. The first illustrates the priorities of all the responses while the second only presents the correctly completed responses. This allows us to ascertain any differences in overall and top priorities caused by the incorrect responses. Overall Selections – All Responses The graph 34 shows the number of respondents that ranked each option at each priority level, including the number of respondents that did not complete the question. This graph shows that, when including all responses, the local issues that were rated as a first, second or third priority by the most groups that responded to the survey was local health and welfare (64% of respondents), followed by local affordable housing (52% of respondents) then local community and recreation (48% of respondents). Overall Selections – Correctly Completed Responses The graph 35 shows the number of respondents that ranked each option at each priority level, excluding the respondents that incorrectly completed the questions (10 respondents). This slightly alters the order of priorities, however, local health and welfare was still selected as a top three priority by the largest proportion of respondents (73% of the respondents that accurately recorded all six priorities). This was then followed by local community and recreation (60% of those that correctly completed the question) then local affordable housing (53% of the 25 respondents that correctly completed the question). Top Priority Local Issue – All Responses The pie chart 36 shows the breakdown of all number 1 selections by option. As many respondents did not complete the question correctly, with some not indicating any number one for any option and others indicating number one for more than one option, this is not an accurate reflection of the breakdown of priorities among all respondents, only among all responses. In total there were 31 number one selections in this question. The graph shows that 32% of all priority one selections were for local health and welfare (almost a third of all priority one selections). This was followed by local affordable housing and local community and recreation selected as a priority one issue for the Peninsula West area in 7 and 5 responses respectively. 36 Top Priority Local Issue – Correctly Completed Responses The pie chart 37 shows the breakdown of the priority one selections by option of all the respondents that correctly completed this question. In total fifteen respondents correctly completed this question and of these 46% (7 groups) selected local health and welfare as their top priority for the Peninsula West area. This was followed equally by local affordable housing and local community and recreation. 6.2.8 New Groups Respondents were asked to suggest additional groups/clubs that could be set up to benefit the Peninsula West villages. Six respondents provided comments including: Something for 14 to 18 year olds Horticulture - gardening society, rambling group Adult literacy classes and learning, linked with the library OAP weekly activity, café club, creative craft meeting Gardening club, community garden (by the fire station) Youth club, sports hall 6.2.9 Additional Comments At the conclusion of the questionnaire, respondents were provided with a space to include any additional thoughts on issues that the Trust could pursue. The following comments were provided by respondents: We are devastated at the thought of the school closure Need to have greater communication between all the local associations Massive knotweed problems in the area Need decent playing fields and play areas All suggested local issues are of equal importance Additional signage on the main roads to attract tourist to the Clyde Sea Loch Trail, with a direct route to Peaton and Rosneath peninsula west for tourists Retention of the primary school Cove Burgh Hall is central part of social, cultural and recreational activities of the community 6.2.10 Conclusions From this consultation with community groups/organisations operating in the Peninsula West area, the following conclusions can be generated: The majority of respondent groups meet on a weekly basis with less than 20 members. The members of most groups come predominately from Cove and Kilcreggan but a small section of groups have members from all the villages in the Peninsula West area. Very few young people (particularly aged between 17 and 30) are involved with the respondents groups although this may be as only 3 of the 8 identified groups for young people in the Peninsula West responded to the survey. On the other hand, residents over the age of 50 attend the majority of the respondent groups, which may be a result of the over-representation of groups which provide services/activities for older age groups among the survey respondents. Cove Burgh Hall was the most often used facility in the area, with respondents also using a number of facilities not suggested or outwith the Peninsula West area. The vast majority of groups that responded to the questionnaire felt their current facilities were adequate for their needs. This was reflected in the new facilities respondents selected as most beneficial to their group, with very few physical improvements/facilities being prioritised. The exception to this was a need for lockable storage, although all other prioritised facilities expressed a demand for better 37 communication mechanisms in the area. This included notice boards, leaflets, computer access and access to a printer and photocopier and a suggestion for a local radio station. The annual turnover of the respondent groups varied, with the majority having a reasonable income of between £1,000 and £5,000 a year. In addition, over two thirds of respondents did not feel they required any ongoing financial assistance in order to continue to operate. Over half of those that answered indicated they would benefit from information and advice on funding sources, which was also selected by respondents as their top priority type of support for their group. Local health and welfare, local affordable housing and local community and recreation were selected most often as the most important issues for the Peninsula West area, reflecting the priorities of the overall community survey. The additional comments and suggestions for new groups in the areas supported the retention of the local school and the provision of a variety of types of group, in particular more activities/facilities for young people. 6.3 YOUTH SURVEY A consultation regarding a potential youth facility in Kilcreggan was conducted by Community Links Scotland's youth work staff during youth outreach sessions in Kilcreggan. In total, 20 young people completed this questionnaire. Almost all of these young people were aged between 13 and 16, with two under 12 and one aged 22. Around three quarters of the young people were male. A further three young people completed the questionnaire at the community prioritisation day in February. 6.3.1 Current Use of Youth Facilities Almost 60% of the young people surveyed did not currently attend any community facilities or youth activity groups in the Kilcreggan area and 70% did not think there was enough for young people to do in the area. Several of the young people reported that they received information, support or advice from family, friends or their school while the majority did not provide an answer. When asked where they usually meet friends, the response was the local park, school or just generally around the village. 6.3.2 New Youth Facility Almost all the young people that responded said they would use a new youth facility if there was one available in the Kilcreggan area and 83% thought that a youth facility would stop young people from getting into trouble. The majority of respondents commented that this was because a new facility would give them something to do to keep them from getting bored and somewhere to go other than on the streets. The young people were then asked to rate how important it would be to include a selection of facilities, activities and services in any new youth facility. Facilities The facilities that were rated the most important by the young people were a sports hall, a cinema, a games room and a café. Other suggestions included astro turf and a skate park. Activities The activities that were selected most often were youth activities, keep fit, music activities and dance of all kinds. Other suggestions for activities were climbing, skateboarding and windsurfing. Services The services that were rated as most important were careers/job advice, money/welfare rights and a youth drop-in centre. 38 The respondents also reported that they were most likely to use any new youth facility on weekday evenings, Sunday afternoons and afternoons throughout the holidays. In comparison, relatively few said they would use the facilities on Saturdays, particularly in the evening, or on Fridays. 6.3.3 Conclusions The young people that completed the questionnaire were mainly male and aged between 13 and 16. Most of the young people did not currently use any youth facilities in the area (57%) while a larger number (70%) believed that there was not enough for young people to do in the Kilcreggan area. Currently, young people are just meeting friends at outdoor locations through the area including the local park and school. Over 90% of the young people that completed a questionnaire said they would use a new community facility. The majority (83%) thought a new facility would keep young people from getting into trouble. A sports hall, cinema and games room were rated as ‘extremely important’ by over 50% of the young people that completed the question. Keep fit and music activities were rated as important by the young people. Careers/job advice and money/welfare advice were also selected as ‘extremely important’ by over 60% of the young people. Weekday evenings were by far the most often selected time that young people would use a youth facility. 6.4 BUSINESS SURVEY 6.4.1 Introduction A business survey questionnaire was sent to 66 identified businesses located in the Peninsula West area. A total of 11 groups responded; a response rate of 17%. The consultation was sent out during the festive period of December 2010 which may account for this low response level. This section will analyse the responses to this consultation. Type of Business A wide range of businesses from the Peninsula West area responded to the survey including botanic gardens, café, trade, motor garage, architect, doctor's surgery, car repair service, embroidered goods, naval architects/surveyor, general store and website design/development. The majority of these businesses are located in Kilcreggan, while three are based in Cove. Between the 11 respondent businesses, 32 full-time staff and 17 part-time staff were employed. Two of the businesses also employed some part-time seasonal staff. Business Support Services Six of the respondents were a part of a business support network while four were not. Three businesses indicated that they would benefit either from being part of a business support network or the development of a local Peninsula network. The business support service rated the number top priority most often was information on potential grant funding sources for development initiatives, selected as the top priority by 45% of respondents. This was followed by sustainability advice e.g. energy conservation, recycling, etc. One respondent also highlighted that a key business support issue in the Peninsula West area is the requirement of a better postal service. 39 6.4.2 Local Transport The top priority transport issue of the local businesses that responded to the survey was competitively priced fuel sourcing, selected as the top transport priority by 36% of respondents. This was followed by village centre parking, which was also selected as the first or second priority by almost two-thirds (64%) of respondent businesses. One business respondent also commented specifically that ferry should run later in the evenings. 6.4.3 Local Environment Appearance of the village generally was selected as the top environment improvement for the Peninsula West area in relation to the day-to-day running and future developments of the business. This was followed by protection of local environment/shoreline as a key environmental improvement for the Peninsula West area. One respondent also commented that the sea wall needs constant repairs and is in need of updating as the sea water level is rising. 6.4.4 Local Resources The majority of businesses indicated they did not have any problems sourcing labour or services in the Peninsula West area. The main areas where some businesses did face difficulties sourcing resources locally were suitable skilled labour and infrastructure services. Two respondents also left additional comments highlighting problems in assessing other services locally: Struggle to get delivery at times Broadband capacity needs improvement 6.4.5 Additional Facilities/Services Seven comments were left suggesting a facility or service not yet available in the Kilcreggan, Cove, Ardpeaton and Peaton area that, if provided, would assist local businesses: Direct road signage from A82 - Peaton for tourists. Lots of tourists would benefit the Peninsula West area and bring money to the area. This could link in with existing tourist route "Clyde Sea Loch Trail" A tourist/heritage/local producers type of network trail for tourist/visitors to the Peninsula Develop tourism in the summer months, April - October Meeting and conference facilities High speed broadband, currently only 2MB max A local pot hole filler and road drain cleaner. In the olden days we had two men on the peninsula doing this full time now we have much more traffic and no road maintenance to speak of A printed business directory of local businesses available at outlets free or low cost – also put an online version in an extended business section of rosneathpeninsula.org 6.4.6 Potential Business Opportunities Twelve suggestions were provided outlining potential business opportunities/gaps in provision in the Peninsula West area that the Trust could help address/fill: Sailing courses for beginners - young, not so young - and other opportunities to enjoy the lochs e.g. sea kayaking Expand on the caravan park idea Promote the area as a place of interest in a historical sense There are many heritage possibilities, could have a small museum with the history of the peninsula 40 Use the local forestry to run a mountain bike race/hill race (running)/motor sport/any of the above on an annual basis, promote water sport activities to exploit what we already have Open Sailing Club to the public and develop woods/walks to give tourists something to do when they are here! The peninsula would be the ideal place for outdoor activities for young and old. Walking, climbing, canoeing, sailing, etc. This could attract large groups of people, schools, scouts, and guides etc. to come and enjoy the outdoors. Take advantage of the potential for renewable energy, particularly wind The Cove and Kilcreggan foreshore could be used to stage an annual arts festival. It would create identity, jobs and bring people to the peninsula. Use outdoor sculpture/art to create a modern identity for Cove and Kilcreggan, perhaps art that is left sitting and evolves with the natural effect of the elements. It would be great to create identity using the lamppost numbers i.e. signs for each lamppost that bear the number of that post? It's something the kids at the primary school could be involved with as well as every household. If they were ceramic it would be inexpensive and would give quirkiness to the Shore Road in particular. Guided day tours from Glasgow - different themes possible – e.g. walking, scenery, architecture, archaeology and defence I plan to have a tea room in future and further develop the gardens here, providing additional employment and bringing more people to the area. 6.4.7 Conclusions From this consultation with businesses based in the Peninsula West area, the following conclusions can be generated: There is a range of full time and part time employment in the Peninsula West area. Businesses desired information on where/how to access funding to develop the business further and advice on the best means to ensure the sustainability of the business. The price of fuel and the lack of parking in the centre of the villages were key transport issues affecting the day to day running and future developments of local businesses. The environment issues that impact upon the day-to-day running and future developments of Peninsula West businesses are the appearance of local villages generally and the protection of the local environment and foreshore. The majority of businesses were able to source resources in the Peninsula West area, however, some businesses faced problems finding suitable skilled labour and infrastructure services locally. There were a number of additional facilities/services highlighted by respondents that could assist local businesses. These mainly concerned the promotion of the area and facilities in the area for tourists as well as the means to promote local businesses and ensure they have the facilities required. The additional business opportunities in the Peninsula West area identified by respondents focussed primarily on the development of the tourism sector in the area through the provision of additional activities, events and attractions to attract visitors to the area. 7.0 PROJECT PRIORITISATION SUMMARY Building on the responses to the four consultations, further questions were developed surrounding the top priorities in each of the six areas explored in the consultations. At a community prioritisation event held in Cove Burgh Hall in February 2011, attended by approximately 160 members of the local community, potential projects were prioritised within 18 areas: 41 Community and Recreation Young people’s place Outdoor sports facilities and sports hall Rainbow Centre Business/Employment Affordable housing Tourist facilities and attractions Small business units Transport Availability of petrol Public transport Paths and pavements Physical Environment Improvement of foreshore and removal of knotweed Appearance of villages, community garden and play area Piers and slipways Employment Improving business opportunities through tourism Nursery/breakfast club/after school club Organised community events to promote tourism Health and Welfare Sheltered housing and care home Befriending services Support for young people The responses at the community prioritisation event showed strong community support for: A youth centre, with the Rainbow Centre selected as the preferred location Renovation of the Rainbow Centre Sports facilities, both indoor sports facilities (including a gym) and an outdoor all-weather 5-aside sports pitch Affordable family and sheltered housing An upgrade of the foreshore and pavement on the road from Kilcreggan to Rosneath Evening public transport, particularly the ferry from Gourock A community petrol station, however, there is little willingness to pay additional cost for local fuel A new marine access facility which can accommodate more boats and a variety of types of boats to encourage tourism to the area A variety of festivals to encourage community interaction as well as attract tourism Any projects that encourage additional tourism to the area and boost the local economy Overall the community prioritisation event broadly confirmed the priorities of the local community highlighted in the four consultations. It also provided further details on the potential location of new facilities and the structure of new projects to take forward the community’s priorities. The responses gathered at the community prioritisation event allowed the development of specific project ideas, as outlined in the 19 project profiles in Section 8. The community prioritisation event was attended by approximately 160 members of the local community. This event included further consultation including a project prioritisation exercise (involving marking priorities on A1 boards) in addition to a public meeting and presentations by the Trust and Community Links Scotland. Participants had the opportunity to prioritise and provide opinions on 18 initial project ideas within 6 themes: community and recreation, business and housing, transport, physical environment, employment and tourism, and health and welfare. The event was 42 intended to gather further opinion in order to allow the development of specific potential project ideas for the Peninsula West area that would form the basis of the Community Action Plan and future priorities for the Trust. 7.1 COMMUNITY AND RECREATION Young People’s Place An overwhelming majority of residents thought that there should be a separate young people’s youth centre. The majority thought that this should be located at the Rainbow Centre, reflecting the preferred purpose of a renovated Rainbow Centre as highlighted below. Should there be a separate youth centre? Yes No Location Rainbow Centre King George V Sports Area Old Tennis Club Church Road Park Kilcreggan House Number 49 2 Number 28 7 6 1 0 The type of facilities highlighted as beneficial to young people in the Peninsula West area included a café, climbing wall, indoor 5-a-side pitch and IT facilities. One additional suggestion was made for an outdoor activity group for young people. Facilities Café Climbing wall Indoor 5 aside Pitch IT Facilities Games Room Recording Studio Number 21 19 17 13 10 9 Arts Room Music Practice Space Crafts Woodwork Performance Space Computer video games space Training Kitchen 9 7 6 5 4 0 Outdoor Sports Facilities Outdoor Sport All weather 5 aside pitch Number 27 Improve existing tennis courts 15 43 Assault course Full rugby pitch Golf course Athletic track Basketball 14 10 2 2 0 The most popular outdoor facility for development in the area was an all-weather 5-a-side pitch and it was suggested by the majority of those that responded that these should be located at the current King George V sports area. This was followed by improving the existing tennis courts, with participants also selecting the existing tennis courts as a location for new or improved outdoor sports facilities. An assault course was also selected as a potential outdoor sports facility, which could also be developed as a tourist attraction for the local area or as part of a children’s play area. Both tourism and children’s play facilities were selected as important issues for the Peninsula West area in other questions at the prioritisation day. Location of outdoor sports facility Place King George v Sports Area Old Tennis Courts Church Road Park Number 24 10 0 Indoor Sports Facilities A gym/fitness suite along with a swimming pool were selected as the most preferred indoor sports facilities. The desire for the provision of a gym in the Peninsula West area was also backed up by the selection of keep fit/gym as a new community group/project and the positive response to the suggestion that the Rainbow Centre could be renovated to provide space for a gym. Indoor sport Gym/fitness suite Swimming pool Badminton courts Health suite Exercise class Squash Dancing Number 23 23 10 8 4 4 1 Rainbow Centre The vast majority of those that completed this board at the prioritisation day thought that the Rainbow Centre should be renovated. Only one participant indicated that the facility should not be renovated but sold off to raise money to provide the other suggested projects for the local area. Should the Rainbow Centre be Renovated Number Yes No 45 1 44 When asked what function the Rainbow Centre should be used for if it was renovated, the majority of participants selected youth centre/drop-in. This reflected a high level of priority given by the local community throughout the process to the provision of facilities and services for young people. A gym was selected the next most often for inclusion in a renovated Rainbow Centre, again highlighting a desire for this local resource that has been shown throughout the questions. Participants also selected arts and crafts workshops and, to a lesser extent, an arts centre as potential functions of a renovated Rainbow Centre. This reflected a desire for workshops as a form of small business unit as outlined in the business and housing section, although few participants wanted these, as business units, to be located in the Rainbow Centre. An arts and crafts exhibition was also the second most popular community event that could be held in the local area. This indicated a strong interest in arts and crafts among the local community, suggesting a desire for projects to increase the provision of and promote arts and crafts in the area. Function Youth centre drop in Gym Arts and crafts workshop Arts centre Sports centre Nursery Performance space Meeting rooms Office space Cafe Conference space Wedding/main event space 7.2 Number 43 17 15 9 5 5 4 3 1 1 1 0 BUSINESS AND HOUSING Affordable Housing The opinion of the local community was divided as to whether new housing should be developed by adapting existing buildings or on a vacant site. However the majority of participants did indicate that ‘above Church Road’ would be the preferred location for any new housing. Area Adapt existing buildings Vacant site Location Above Church Road Between Argyll and Barbour Road Next to School Road Number 33 26 Number 34 12 9 Housing that was suitable for families and sheltered housing emerged as the preferred types of housing development for the Peninsula West area, with both receiving a far higher number of selections than any other type of housing. This was concurrent with the desire highlighted by the local community throughout the process to attract young families to ensure the sustainability of the area and to provide for the elderly to prevent them having to leave the Peninsula to access appropriate housing. 45 One participant commented that what was needed in the area was ‘mid affordable housing in order for families in first time houses to move on thus freeing up houses for first time buyers’. Type Family Sheltered Single person Wheelchair Access Amenity Other Number 48 42 5 3 0 0 Tourist Facilities and Attractions Participants indicated that sports facilities/water sports should be developed as tourist attractions in the area. These initiatives would benefit the community through the provision of additional local facilities and would tie into the community demands for a gym, 5-a-side pitch and assault course highlighted in other questions. Information points around the area as well as, to a lesser extent, additional road signage were also selected as a priority to help attract tourists to the area. Participants also indicated support for the development of the existing visitor centre at Linn Gardens as a tourist attraction for the Peninsula West area. Attraction Sports facilities/water sports Information points around the area Development of visitor centre at Lynn Gardens Additional Road Signage Tourist accommodation Information centre Café/tea/restaurant Caravan park Number 41 30 21 18 14 8 5 2 Small Business Units Workshop space was the most popular option for business facilities in the Peninsula West area. Type Workshop space Business centre Office Space Meeting facilities Storage space Other Number 39 14 7 3 1 0 Fort Road was also selected by the majority of participants as the preferred location for the development of business units. 46 Location of Business Units Where Fort Road Rainbow Centre Next to fire station Field above South Ailey Road 7.3 Number 23 9 7 2 TRANSPORT Pavements and Paths Participants selected Shore Road as their preferred location for new footpaths. This was closely followed by ‘Mill Brae - Barbour Road’, with both options receiving the vast majority of selections made. Location Shore Road Footpath Mill Brae – Barbour Road School Road Argyll Road Number 48 37 11 5 Of those that completed the additional questions on transport, opinion was divided on the most important issues regarding local pavements. Pavement width and overhanging hedges were both selected as top priority issues. Issue Widen pavements Cut back overhanging hedges Increased crossing areas Number 6 5 3 While only a small number of participants completed the question, ‘upgrading existing pavements’ received the most selections as the top pavement/path issue in the Peninsula West area. This was followed by ‘creating additional pavements where possible’ and ‘creating a shore front footpath were possible’. Public Transport The majority of participants indicated that they thought the last bus from Helensburgh should leave later than its current time of 22.05. However, there was little demand for the bus service to extend well beyond midnight, with the majority of participants indicating that just after 11 or just after 12 would be most appropriate. Time 23.05 0.05 22.05 1.05 Later than 01.05 Number 20 17 1 0 0 47 Similarly, the vast majority of participants indicated a desire for the last ferry from Gourock to leave much later than it currently does. The preferred time was just after nine o’clock, much later than the current times of 18.10 on Mondays to Saturdays and 16.15 on Sundays. Time 21.10 Later than 21.10 20.10 19.10 Number 28 6 5 4 Participants also indicated that the most problematic transport links faced by the Peninsula West are related to the Ferry timetable. The top issue was with the timing of the ferry from Kilcreggan and the train leaving Gourock, followed by the link between the Ferry from Gourock and the bus at Kilcreggan to the other areas of the Peninsula. Problem Ferry from Kilcreggan to train in Gourock Ferry from Gourock to bus in Kilcreggan Bus from peninsula to ferry in Kilcreggan Train from Glasgow to Helensburgh Bus from Peninsula to train in Helensburgh Number 20 11 8 8 0 For the largest proportion of participants, the development of an evening ferry service to and from Gourock was the most important transport improvement that could be made in the area. This was followed by a more frequent ferry service and a weekend ferry service to and from Gourock, highlighting the importance of this link to the local community. Transport Evening ferry service to and from Gourock More frequent ferry service to and from Gourock Weekend ferry service to and from Gourock More frequent ferry service to Helensburgh More frequent bus service to Helensburgh Evening bus service More frequent bus service within Peninsula Number 46 27 22 9 6 2 1 The majority of participants felt that the biggest transport issues facing the Peninsula West area were in travelling to wider areas from the Peninsula. Issue Travelling to wider areas such as Gourock and/or Helensburgh Travelling within the Peninsula Number 11 2 Among those that answered the additional questions on transport, opinion was roughly equally split on whether additional information on public transport timetables would be beneficial. However, 48 slightly more participants felt that disabled access to public transport on the Peninsula was a problem than thought it was not a problem. Availability of Petrol Opinion on the location of a potential petrol station was split between a central Kilcreggan location at Rosneath Road and a location in Cove, next to the fire station. This may reflect a split in the addresses of the people selecting each option. Location Rosneath road at site of old surgery Next to fire station At Kilcreggan car park Number 40 34 7 The vast majority of respondents indicated that they would only be willing to pay Helensburgh prices for petrol on the Peninsula. However a small proportion indicated they would consider paying more if a petrol station was developed in the local area. Price Helensburgh Price 5p extra per litre 10p extra per litre 20p extra per litre Number 52 17 5 1 Additional questions were also completed by a small selection of participants. These indicated that the majority would use a petrol station in the local area as their main source of fuel and that this petrol station would be used primarily for fuel rather than other services. As your main petrol station Would you use a local petrol Station? If you were unable to Rarely Never get to Helensburgh Total 12 1 13 Diesel 13 7.4 0 0 What services would you like to see provided at a local petrol station? Petrol Air Shop Car wash Total 9 5 2 0 29 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Appearance of Villages, Community Garden and Play Area Community woodland and play areas equally received the most selections as a desired improvement to the Peninsula West area, followed by community garden and sculptures. This suggests a desire for outdoor gathering areas as a priority for members of the local community. Improvement Community Woodland Play area Community garden Community sculptures Benches Allotments Number 32 32 21 19 16 14 49 Bulb plants Picnic area Flower Tubs Hanging Baskets Skate park Sensory Garden 12 10 7 4 2 1 Of the participants who completed the additional questions on physical environment, all thought that community spaces should be ‘suitable for all age groups’. Piers and Slipways More than double the number of participants favoured the creation of a new marine access facility and community pontoon compared to those favouring an upgrade of the existing facility in Kilcreggan. The most favoured location for any new marine facility was the ‘old boat yard’ in Kilcreggan. Improvement New marine access facility – community pontoon Upgrade existing pier Overnight berth Location Old boat yard Kilcreggan pier upgrade Sailing Club Number 45 20 7 Number 44 16 8 Of the few participants that completed additional environment questions, opinion was split on what the main purpose of improvements to piers and slipways should be with ‘attract new business’, ‘make business in the area easier’, ‘attract tourism to the area’ and ‘make commuting easier’ all being selected by an equal number of people. Again, although few participants completed the question, ‘encouraging increased use of the existing pier’ was selected as the preferred focus of any improvement to the piers and slipways in the Peninsula West area. Improvement of Foreshore A path along the shore was selected most frequently as a desired improvement to the local environment. This reflects the location in which most participants indicated they would like to see new paths and pavements developed. A large proportion of respondents also indicated that litter bins should be provided in order to improve the appearance of the area. This concern with litter in the local area, and particularly on the shore front, was highlighted in a number of comments left on the original community consultation. Improvement Path along the shore Litter bins Better access to the beach Sculpture Trail Parking on foreshore Signage Number 55 41 21 13 4 1 50 7.5 EMPLOYMENT AND TOURISM Organised Events The event that the largest proportion of participants would like to see in the local area in order to attract tourism was a music festival. This was closely followed by an arts/crafts exhibition, regatta festival and Celtic festival. In total 222 selections for potential events were made, suggesting strong support for hosting festivals in the local area in order to attract tourism. Event Music festival Local arts/crafts exhibition Cove Regatta festival Celtic festival Farmers market Local history festival Walking festival Film festival Theatre festival Highland games Nature festival Fiddlers rally Number 44 36 34 31 24 15 10 9 6 5 5 3 Nursery/Pre-school/Afterschool Care Facility There were not many responses to the question regarding the use of childcare facilities. However, this may have reflected the demographic of participants at the prioritisation event as many potential participants were attending a “save our school” event in Rosneath on the same day. Days 1 day a week 2 days a week 3 days a week 4 days a week 5 days a week Nursery Number 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-school Number 0 0 3 1 2 Breakfast Club Number 1 0 1 1 4 Afterschool Club - Number 1 2 7 1 5 Improving Business Opportunities through Tourism The aspects of the Peninsula West area that should be promoted to tourists emphasise the active side of the local area including sport, water and walking activities. If these were to be developed this could provide the area with a clear image to present in attracting tourism. This could be coupled with additional signage in the area, potentially highlighting the sights from certain key areas, to presenting the area as a tourist destination. Aspect Sports facilities/water sports Views/beauty Walking/hiking Heritage/architecture Specific attractions Number 34 31 30 18 10 51 Camping/Caravanning 9 These views were reinforced in the selection of activities the Trust could undertake to attract tourist to the area. Participants indicated that more facilities and activities should be provided in the area for tourists and again highlighted the potential of using walks in the local area to attract tourists. The development of a tourist website for the area and the provision of signage at key sites on the Peninsula West were also selected as potential activities to help develop tourism. Idea Facilities/activities for tourists Walks Website Signage/heritage sites Promotional Leaflets More tourist information 7.6 Number 35 32 26 21 14 14 HEALTH AND WELFARE Befriending Service The majority of participants selected the elderly as the group that any new befriending service should focus on, with some support for befriending services for people who are disabled as well. Participants also, on the whole, thought that befriending should take the form of assisting with shopping and to attend social events. Group Elderly Disabled people Families/households new to the area New parents Young people Type Assisting people with shopping/errands Assisting people to attend social activities Assisting people around the house Home based Weekly group Number 50 23 18 11 7 Number 36 32 12 5 2 Two additional comments were left regarding the befriending service that ‘school children could get involved in Lunch Club’ and ‘old and young people should be brought together to achieve mutual understanding’. Sheltered Housing/Care Home There was no clear opinion among participants on where any sheltered housing developments should take place. The church on Shore Road and Kilcreggan House were both equally selected by the largest proportion of participants, suggesting there is some preference for renovating existing property in the area as opposed to a new development. Both properties were available for sale at the time of the consultation, however, the church was sold shortly after and is not longer a possible location for the housing. 52 Location Church on Shore Road Kilcreggan House Shore Road next to fire station South Ailey Road Number 34 34 23 0 The majority of participants considered a care home in the local area should provide services for the elderly in general rather than for a specific condition or any other group of people. One participant suggested that a ‘respite care-home with volunteers from community’ should be provided in the area instead of sheltered housing/care home accommodation. Service General care for elderly Care home for specific condition – Alzheimer’s Care home for physical disability Care home for mental health Number 47 7 6 3 Support for Young People The largest proportion of participants indicated a preference for support for young people to be provided through a centre based youth club. This reflected the emphasis on renovating the Rainbow Centre as a youth centre. This was followed by the importance of providing job opportunities for young people from the area. One additional suggestion was left by a participant to ‘include a central based youth club that could include a homework club for both primary and secondary pupils using teaching talent in the region’. Type of support Centre based for youth club The provision of job opportunities for young people Combination of Streetwork/youth club Introduction of activities for young people Provision of local learning opportunities for young people Careers advice for young people Streetwork Health/healthy living advice for young people Number 35 19 7 7 7 3 1 1 Twenty-two participants indicated they thought it would be beneficial to set up a volunteering programme for young people This would involve young people earning rewards (such as trips to the cinema) if they volunteer a certain number of hours on tasks such as befriending or picking up litter. One participant also left an additional comment that ‘young people should be part of keeping the community in good condition in order for them to have pride in their area’. The vast majority of respondents felt that employment opportunities should be provided for young people within the local area, either through existing businesses or as an integral part of any community projects developed. 53 Opportunity Encourage apprenticeships in local businesses Include Employment opportunities in community projects Encourage entrepreneurship in young people Provide support to allow young people to access jobs out with the peninsula 7.7 Number 26 21 13 8 OTHER PROJECTS In addition to the large scale often capital intensive projects, several other smaller projects and/or group based projects were raised throughout the various surveys and prioritisation events. Community Groups Identified at Prioritisation Day Activity Youth group Gardening club Keep fit/gym IT classes Afterschool clubs Book club Badminton Any sports activities Running group Youth football Netball (for adults) Bridge club Number 24 23 21 17 10 10 6 4 3 3 3 2 A new youth group was selected most often as an additional community group to be developed in the area. This reinforced the importance given by the community throughout the consultation of the plan to providing a variety of activities for the young people of the Peninsula West area, as highlighted in the responses to a number of the questions asked throughout the community day. Also identified at the prioritisation day was a gardening club which does not appear to exist in the Peninsula at present. A gardening club could also tie in with improving the appearance of the local area and providing support to the elderly, which were also concerns raised in the consultation. Keep fit/gym was also selected by several local community members at the community open day. However, the Peninsula West area is already served by a number of keep fit/sport groups including: zumba, yoga, line dancing, karate, football, table tennis, country dancing and badminton. This suggests either that people are not aware of these clubs, which should then be better advertised, the available clubs do not cover the breadth of interests in the area or that people more specifically would like to see a gym developed in the local area. The latter suggestion is backed up by the low number of respondents selecting ‘any sport activities’ as an additional resource for the area and the high number of participants selecting gym/fitness suite as a preferred indoor sports facility for the area. 54 Respondents also selected IT classes as a further group for the area. There is currently a computer club operating across the whole of the Peninsula, and this response suggests there is potential either for this club to expand to provide IT training or for the separate provision of IT courses in the area. 7.8 FAVOURITE PROJECTS Fifty-five participants indicated what their favourite project for the Peninsula West area was, with some indicating second preferences as well. The table below shows the number of participants highlighting each project idea as their favourite indicating that a community wind farm was the most popular. This was followed by projects for young people and the creation of a path along the shore front. Project Idea No' of Participants Favourite Project Wind Farm Youth project Shore Path Environment Sports facilities Sheltered Housing Pier development Petrol Recreation Events to promote tourism Health Woodland/play area Affordable housing Tourism facilities Provision for elderly Knotweed Improvements to ferry service General appearance Berth for yachts Walking group Close generation gap Transport Meeting place/Rainbow Centre Income generating projects Sculpture path Total number of participants 12 6 5 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 55 No' of Participants Second Favourite Project 2 2 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 25 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS “Any Initiatives should have as a priority the encouraging of local community spirit and pride. There are many activities/interests already catered for but it needs a real dose of enthusiasm and vibrancy.” 55 “I believe that we need to provide more facilities for our younger generation so that we can retain youths and entice new families to the area. We cannot allow our village to become retirement area.” “We definitely need more facilities for young people to stop them carrying out anti-social behaviour that we so often see.” “Would prioritize affordable housing but would strongly oppose the provision of more Rosneath type council housing.” “[B]ring tourists and families here to visit and live. This in turn helps us boost local business. Sailing, walking, peace, art is the way ahead” Additional comments on paths and pavements: “Need to have a proper kids crossing halfway up School Road” “Create a cycle track from Kilcreggan to Coulport” “Create a path along the top of the Peninsula, probably linking in with other long distance paths” “Create pavements/paths for Peaton and Ardpeaton” “Extend footpath from Cove to Peaton and along Mill Brae to Rosneath Caravan Park in order to attract visitors to walk to Kilcreggan.” “Keep the road drains clear at all times” “Paths at the village where zebra crossing is” “Keep the road drains clear, stop frost damage and the winter won’t damage the roads so much” “Direct road signage from A82 to Coulport for tourists. Road A817 won awards for driving on; lots of tourists could benefit and bring money to the area. This could link in with existing tourist route ‘Clyde Sea Loch Trail’.” “Would like some street lighting in Ardpeaton as it is very dark especially in the winter months.” “More frequent ferries to Helensburgh on Saturdays” Additional comments on public transport: “Later ferries from Gourock to Helensburgh” “Bus and ferry times linked” “Weekend ferry, winter timetable, disabled access” “Extend ferry services weekend, winter disabled access” “More frequent ferries to Helensburgh on Saturdays” “Safer bus service, drivers go too fast, take too many risks” “Ferry service into Glasgow for people working in the city” “Train to and from Gourock is very unreliable when we take ferry” “Make the bus slow down and turn off its engine when stationary” “Kilcreggan Ferry should be linked with CalMac ferries to Dunoon (instead of arriving two minutes after Dunoon ferry leaves)” “Wheelchair access on ferry is vital” “Good transport system on the Peninsula” “Properly lit dog walking paths” “Projects to increase biodiversity, without rich biodiversity all the rest will be poor” “Maintain stone walks along Shore Road” “Restore the area of Fort Road which is a nature conservation and is being developed by the private sector - would be interested in the conservation of it all” “Community woodland and play area - I was involved in a similar project in Cornwall and it was very well received by young and old” 56 “I would like to see a coastal warden being employed to keep the peninsula’s beach clean from the dangerous items that get washed up all the time” Additional comments on the environment: “Give the Council power to fine households that allow raw sewage to go into the loch.” “Putting in the litter bins causes more litter if they are not maintained” “Extend the sewage scheme to included houses past Cove village to at least Knockderry” “Plastic waste & sewage related waste more unsightly even more than knotweed” “Marine Conservation - Cowal has an ‘adopt a beach’ scheme. Should we campaign for the peninsula to join?” “It would be great to have an environment art festival every year along Cove and Kilcreggan.” Additional comments on organised events: “Need to be more welcoming to newcomers” “Food fair and real ale festival” “Walking festival based on the Cowal Fest which combines walking, local history, music, visiting local artists/crafts people in their homes/studios” “A half marathon run for charity” “A local swimming pool would be appreciated. Perhaps it would be sited at Rosneath Caravan Park and used by the local residents and tourists.” “A pool of drivers willing to do out of hours hospital runs in the case of emergencies.” “Young people can feel quite cut off from career service, etc, so it would be handy to have advice more locally.” “We could enshrine [lamp posts] by creating a unique sign, perhaps ceramic, for each post bearing its number.” ‘Submarine museum’ ‘Resurface tennis courts as all weather surface with markings for other sports such as basketball’ ‘Walking group’ ‘Community garden plots’ ‘Investigation of feasibility of connecting mains gas’ ‘All new housing to be fitted with solar panels’ ‘Replace notice boards in Cove and Kilcreggan’ ‘Credit union’ ‘Barter system for work and assistance’ ‘Community shop’ ‘Community access to IT, broadband and business support’ ‘A path along the spine of the peninsula possibly linking other long distance paths. This would be small in size separate from the forestry track’ ‘Interest free loans to fit solar power panels to existing housing’ ‘We need to keep the village post office which is under threat, maybe run it as a community post office” ‘Anti-litter campaign’ ‘Community register to match people who want to grow vegetables but don’t have land with people who have land but can’t or don’t have time to grow fruit and vegetables.’ ‘Coastal path from Kilcreggan to Cove’ “I would be interested in the issues of the sustainable generation of energy e.g. wind farm and hydro energy.” 8.0 PROJECT PROFILES 57 Nineteen potential project ideas were developed using the information from the needs analysis, policy context, the four consultations and the community prioritisation event. The project profile for each idea intends to provide tangible projects which could be developed by the Trust to ensure the identified needs and demands of the local community are met. The aims, outcomes and outputs of each project are outlined along with details of how the projects would tackle community needs, meet the community demands and contribute to the national and local policies outlined in previous chapters. This information can then be used by the Trust when planning potential projects and applying for funding so that they are able to take forward the aspirations of the Rosneath Peninsula West community. Community and Recreation YOUTH CENTRE AIM The aim of this project would be the creation of a dedicated space for the young people of the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved are: The provision of a youth centre catering for young people The involvement of a significant number of young people from the area in diversionary activities OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: Reduced impact of antisocial behaviour and young people on the streets in evenings as a result of diversionary activities Better informed young people with access to support services to enable them to develop as citizens NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need While there is a lower proportion of young people in the Peninsula West area than in both Argyll and Bute and Scotland, the proportion of 16-19 year olds in the population is much greater. Across the three data zones that comprise the Peninsula west area, 16 – 19 year olds account for 5.35% of the area, higher than the 4.82% and 5.13% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. In one of the areas, 16 -19 year olds account for 6.67% of the population, 38% higher than Argyll and Bute as a whole. 29.7% of all households in the Peninsula West area contain dependent children, slightly higher than the 26.8% and 28.2% rate of household with dependent children in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. Current Provision in Area While a number of groups for young people such as Rainbows, Cubs, Scouts and Guides are held in the area, there are no youth groups outwith these organisations and no dedicated youth space in the Peninsula West area. There is currently a project under consideration/development to renovate the 58 tennis pavilion at the top of Church Road to create, even in the short term, a dedicated youth centre for the Peninsula West area. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey Almost a third of respondents to the household survey selected ‘a young people’s place’ as their top community and recreation priority for the Peninsula West area. 69% selected this option as one of their top three priorities, making this the fourth most popular option in the whole survey. Young People Survey 91% of the young people who completed the survey responded that they would use a new youth facility if it was provided in the area and 83% thought that it would reduce antisocial behaviour. Community Prioritisation Event 96% of the participants that completed the Young People’s Place board indicated that there should be a separate youth centre in the Peninsula West area. 68% of participants believed this should be located in the Rainbow Centre. RELEVANT POLICIES The Argyll and Bute Antisocial Behaviour Strategy 2005-2008 identified that within the Kilcreggan and Cove area: “Occasional problems arise with young people, under 18 years of age, from outside the area causing trouble. A small number of vandalism and alcohol related offences are reported.” (p.22) The strategy is committed to projects which are targeted at individuals and groups who engage in antisocial behaviour and aims to encourage them to participate in activities which divert them from conduct which constitutes antisocial behaviour. In addition, a dedicated youth centre, including the provision of services and activities directed at young people could contribute to the Scottish Government’s national outcome: “Our young people are successful learners, confident individuals, effective contributors and responsible citizens.” POTENTIAL PROJECT The Trust could purchase the Rainbow Centre with the aim of converting the building into a youth centre. A dedicated space specifically for young people to gather would prevent them from hanging about the streets and potentially engaging in antisocial behaviour. The Trust could also engage outside organisations to provide support services to young people for example talks on health issues and activities, such as sport activities, to engage young people. The provision of a facility allowing young people to interact would also provide an ideal scenario for the Trust to engage young people in wider issues relating to the Peninsula West area, perhaps with the development of a youth subcommittee of the Trust or similar. Facilities at Youth Centre Respondents to the young people’s survey selected a sports hall, cinema, and games room as the top priority facilities for inclusion in a youth centre. Participants at the community prioritisation event highlighted a café, climbing wall and indoor 5-a-side pitch as the top three facilities. POTENTIAL LOCATION 59 Community Preference 68% of the participants at the Community Prioritisation Event felt that a youth centre should be based in a renovated Rainbow Centre. In addition to considering the Rainbow Centre as a youth venue, the Trust are also committed to assisting the existing youth group and their efforts to improve the old tennis court pavilion. It is possible that in the longer term this building could be demolished and replaced with a sports centre featuring a separately accessed youth wing. Current Ownership of Site The last recorded proprietor of the Rainbow Centre was Dumbarton District Council, the assets of which will have been transferred to either West Dunbartonshire Council or Argyll and Bute Council upon reorganisation of the local authorities in Scotland. The Rainbow Centre is a listed building, Category C(S), which may limit the renovations that can be undertaken. Details of the ownership of the tennis courts and bowling club could not be determined exactly but may be owned by the local authority. COST OF PROJECT £270,000 - improved Rainbow Centre £350,000 - attached to a new indoor sports facility POTENTIAL FUNDERS Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Assets stream can support communities to develop community facilities where these are owned and controlled by the local community. Big Lottery Fund can provide up to £1m where there is strong evidence of need for project. A mandate of 10% community support is required for successful projects. The Robertson Trust can support Scottish charities to improve facilities contributing up to 10% of overall capital costs with priorities including young people, education and community sports. Garfield Weston Foundation and Tudor Trust provide funding for small charities and both have recent history of contributing towards community owned facilities in rural Argyll. BBC Children in Need will fund up to £20,000 of building costs for projects that aim to make positive changes to the lives of disadvantaged children and young people. The Links Foundation aims to benefit communities throughout the UK by providing, or assisting, in the provision of facilities or services necessary to improve quality of life. The Foundation provides funding of on average £20,000 for revenue and capital costs of projects. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Cove and Kilcreggan Youth Café – This group is currently trying to convert the old tennis pavilion into a youth centre. To prevent duplication of projects, the Trust could work closely with this group to develop any facilities/activities for young people in the area, access funding and generate interest in renovating the old tennis pavilion in the short term. For the longer term, the Trust could work with the group to involve young people in a larger scale redevelopment to create a modern, lasting facility for the young people of the area. Argyll and Bute Youth Services – The Trust should also involve the council youth services in any proposed project. The department may be able to assist by providing advice and contacts to other groups working with young people. They may also be able to provide practical help through funding or 60 support to maintain the centre and any youth activities as part of their commitment to providing “enjoyable opportunities, challenging experiences and effective support” to young people aged 11 to 25 years old in Argyll and Bute. PROJECT EXAMPLES Route 81 Youth Project, Garelochhead Route 81 Youth Project redeveloped the former Outdoor Education Centre in Garelochhead to provide a facility that is for the whole community and run by the community. The centre is intended to serve the needs of local young people and the wider community while sustaining itself through residential visitors using it on a commercial basis as an outdoor activities residential centre. The Loft Youth Project The Loft Youth Project was established to address the needs of young people in Keith. The Loft runs an informal drop-in where young people are largely responsible for the development and running of the provision. Loft Trading was set up in 2005 to provide commercial, work based learning environments for the young people and to provide SVQ accredited training. This project aims to provide better training and learning opportunities for young people and to significantly improve the built environment in which this learning takes place. Community and Recreation ALL-WEATHER 5-A-SIDE PITCH AIM The aim of this project would be the creation of an all-weather 5-a-side pitch for use by local residents and community groups throughout the year in order to increase options for recreational activities in the area and provide a resource to enable local residents to live healthy lifestyles. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved are: The creation of an all weather 5-a-side pitch The development of 8 new sport clubs involving 100 local residents OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: Increased opportunities for healthy living for local residents Increased provision of sport activity groups across all age groups and interests in the community Additional facilities to allow increased social interaction and community events for the Peninsula West area NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need Across the Peninsula West area, there are reasonably good levels of health, however, the data zone surrounding Kilcreggan has a higher standardised mortality rate than regionally and nationally at 19%, higher than expected compared to Argyll and Bute (SIMD, 2009). The average standardised mortality ratio across the Peninsula West area is 5% lower than expected but still represents a higher mortality rate than across the whole of Argyll and Bute. Current Provision in Area There are poorly maintained tennis courts in very poor condition located in Cove and the King George V sports area located in Kilcreggan which over recent years has been colonised by vegetation from the 61 adjacent Site of Scientific Interest. There is also a small ash football pitch at Kilcreggan Primary School. None of these pitches have appropriate associated facilities and are not suitable for use all year round, in all weather conditions. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey Almost a quarter of respondents selected improvements to outdoor sports facilities as their top priority community and recreation issue, while two thirds indicated that this option was one of their top three priorities for the Peninsula West area. In addition, 7 comments left by respondents to the community questionnaire specifically called for the development of an all-weather 5 a-side/astro turf pitch in the Peninsula West area. Community Prioritisation Event 39% of participants completing this board at the community open day indicated they would most like to see an all-weather 5-a-side pitch developed in the Peninsula West area. This option was selected over improving the existing tennis courts (21%), assault course (20%), full rugby pitch (14%) and golf course and athletic track (both 3%). RELEVANT POLICIES The development of sports facilities in the Peninsula West area that are accessible all year round would contribute towards the Scottish Government’s Healthier Strategic Objective to “help people to sustain and improve their health, especially in disadvantaged communities, ensuring better, local and faster access to health care”. The Scottish Government Strategy for the wider impact of the Commonwealth Games, A Games Legacy for Scotland, aims to create a network of community sports hubs across Scotland to improve the use of, and access to, facilities for physical activity and competitive sport. Community sports hubs can be based in local facilities such as sports centres, community centres and/or schools and will provide a home for local clubs and sports and provide information and advice to local people, bringing together communities. The Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 also has a commitment towards creating vibrant communities through ‘high quality public services and leisure/community facilities that attract people to settle in Argyll and Bute’ and forward looking communities which are ‘proactive communities where local people and organisations look for and create opportunities’. The development of outdoor sports facilities could contribute to both these aims of Argyll and Bute’s Community Planning Partnership. The Trust would seek funding to develop an outdoor multi-use sports facility that could be used for a number of sports and in all weather conditions. POTENTIAL LOCATION Community Preference 71% of participants completing the Outdoor Sports Facilities board at the community prioritisation event indicated they felt the current King George V sports area on the east of Kilcreggan was the most suitable place to locate any renovated outdoor sports facilities or a sports hall. With the existing tennis courts/bowling green open space/park identified as the alternative site. Current Ownership of Site The west half of King George V park appears to still be owned by the survivors of Ronald McNair Teacher. The east half of King George V park appears to be owned by John and Jeanette Phipps. 62 COST OF PROJECT £120,000 (3rd generation adult size synthetic grass pitch including drainage, fencing/gates, lighting, goals, etc.) POTENTIAL FUNDERS Sport Scotland can provide up to 50% funding for community sports facility development that will drive an increase in community based sports participation. To secure investment, the input of strategic sports partners, Argyll and Bute Sports Development and Helensburgh and Lomond Sports Council, is essential to ensure the project fits with areas sports development objectives. The Gannochy Trust supports charities and develops youth and recreation projects and The Robertson Trust prioritises community sports projects which can contribute to either capital or revenue costs for this development. Peter Harrison Foundation Awards are made to registered charities for projects involving sporting activities that provide community development opportunities. Comic Relief has an ongoing commitment to sports development where these activities are used as part of a wider set of regeneration objectives or to improve the quality of life for the most marginalised in the community. Helensburgh & Lomond Sports Council/Argyll and Bute Sports Development – The Trust should develop projects in conjunction with Helensburgh and Lomond Sports Council and the relevant Argyll and Bute Council department in order to be eligible for Sports Scotland funding. In particular, these organisations can provide advice on types of facilities and relevant partners to progress the project and support the Trust with accessing funding for sports facilities PROJECT EXAMPLES Muirkirk Enterprise Group The Trust designed and built an outdoor sports complex, with facilities for tennis, volleyball, netball and basketball. Princess Royal Sports Community Trust The Trust owns the stadium building it operates from and provides facilities for physical recreation and leisure time activity, including a multi-gym, astro-turf sports pitches and out of school childcare. The Trust also delivers outreach coaching/fitness sessions to local schools, nursing homes and in various town halls in the area. Community and Recreation INDOOR SPORTS FACILITY AIM The aim of this project would be the creation of an indoor sports facility for the Peninsula West area to allow the provision of sport and keep fit activities and encourage healthy living among residents of the area. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved are: The development of indoor sports facilities 63 The development of 12 new sporting activities encouraging 150 of local residents to get involved in healthy living activities OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: Increased opportunities for healthy living for local residents Increased provision of sport activity groups across all age groups and interests in the community Additional facilities to allow increased social interaction and community events for the Peninsula West area NEED FOR PROJECT There are no dedicated indoor sports facilities, including a gym/fitness suite, in the Peninsula West area. Local residents have to travel to Garelochhead and Helensburgh to access these facilities. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey A sports hall was rated as the third priority by respondents from each area. Almost a quarter of all respondents selected this option as their top community/recreation priority while 67% selected a sports hall as one of their top three community/recreation priorities. Ten comments were left requesting indoor sports facilities including a gym and sports hall suitable for badminton, 5-a-side football and similar sports. Four respondents suggested that Cove Burgh Hall and two suggested that the Sailing Club could be renovated to allow provision of these indoor sports facilities. Of the 40 suggestions (made by 116 respondents) for new groups/clubs for the Peninsula West area, the vast majority were for indoor activities. Six respondents also suggested a gym would be beneficial for the local area. Young People’s Survey 70% of the young people who completed this questionnaire felt that it was ‘extremely important’ to include a sports hall in any youth centre development. Further 20% also felt it was ‘important’. Community Prioritisation Event A gym/fitness suite, along with a swimming pool, were selected as by far the most preferred indoor sports facilities, each selected by 32% of the participants on the day. The desire for the provision of a gym in the Peninsula West area is also backed up by the selection of keep fit/gym as a new community group/project (by 17% of participants who left suggestions) and the positive response to the suggestion that the Rainbow Centre could be renovated to provide space for a gym (also selected by 16% of participants). RELEVANT POLICIES The development of sports facilities in the Peninsula West area that are accessible all year round would contribute towards the Scottish Government’s Healthier strategic objective to ‘help people to sustain and improve their health, especially in disadvantaged communities, ensuring better, local and faster access to health care’. The Scottish Government Strategy for the wider impact of the Commonwealth Games (A Games Legacy for Scotland) aims to create a network of community sports hubs across Scotland to improve the use of, and access to, facilities for physical activity and competitive sport. Community sports hubs can be based in local facilities such as sports centres, community centres and/or schools and will provide a home for local clubs and sports and provide information and advice to local people, bringing together communities. 64 The Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 also has a commitment towards creating vibrant communities through “high quality public services and leisure/community facilities that attract people to settle in Argyll and Bute” and forward looking communities which are “proactive communities where local people and organisations look for and create opportunities”. The development of indoor sports facilities could contribute to both these aims of Argyll and Bute’s Community Planning Partnership. POTENTIAL LOCATION The potential project would secure funding for community ownership and refurbishment of the changing pavilion at the King George V park. Alternatively, the indoor sports centre could be located on the site of the existing tennis pavilion and integrated with the tennis, bowls and all weather pitch and be central to a community campus within this part of Cove/Kilcreggan. Community Preference 71% of participants completing the relevant board at the community prioritisation event indicated they felt the current King George V sports area on the east of Kilcreggan was the most suitable place to locate any renovated indoor sports facilities/sports hall. Current Ownership of Site The west half of King George V park appears to still be owned by the survivors of Ronald McNair Teacher. The east half of King George V park appears to be owned by John and Jeanette Phipps. COST OF PROJECT £1,570,000 (Assumed gross internal floor area 600 m2; includes badminton court, gym, hall/meeting room, showers/toilets, changing rooms, demolition of existing pavilion) POTENTIAL FUNDERS Sport Scotland can provide up to 50% funding for community sports facility development that will drive an increase in sports participation at community level. The Gannochy Trust supports charities and develops youth and recreation projects and The Robertson Trust operates a priority for community sports which can contribute to either capital or revenue costs for this development. Peter Harrison Foundation Awards are made to registered charities for projects involving sporting activities that provide community development opportunities. Helensburgh & Lomond Sports Council/Argyll and Bute Sports Development – The Trust should develop projects in conjunction with Helensburgh and Lomond Sports Council and the relevant Argyll and Bute Council department in order to be eligible for Sports Scotland funding. In particular, these organisations can provide advice on types of facilities and relevant partners to progress the project and support the Trust with accessing funding for sports facilities PROJECT EXAMPLE Wellhouse Community Trust The Trust have three community facilities in Easterhouse including “the hub” (a community education and employment facility), “innerzone” (a facility for young people) and “hubSports” (a sports facility). The organisation directly delivers two community cafes, walking club, elderly lunch club, cheerleading, ICT, various social and community events/evenings, advice and support, youth drop-in, 65 youth holiday programmes, music/recording studio, family excursions, family support, a wide variety of volunteering opportunities and confidence building initiatives. Community and Recreation RAINBOW CENTRE AIM The aim of this project would be to redevelop the Rainbow Centre to create a facility meeting local community need. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved are: • The creation of an additional high quality community facility for the area • Saving a significant social and historical building from falling further into disrepair OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • A redeveloped building, creating an additional community resource for the Peninsula • Increased community involvement and ownership of this resource NEED FOR PROJECT Current Provision in Area The Cove Burgh Hall provides facilities to local residents and community groups it is, however, almost full to capacity and another community owned facility is clearly required to meet the needs of one or more of the following: nursery/after school accommodation, arts venue, youth facility, sports facility or business centre. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey Rainbow Centre renovation in tandem with Cove Burgh Hall was selected as the fourth priority by respondents from all areas. Six respondents suggested ways to renovate the Rainbow Centre to reopen it, including turning the centre into a sports facility or utilising it as a youth centre. COMMUNITY PRIORITISATION EVENT 98% of all participants completing the Rainbow Centre Renovation board at the community day thought the Rainbow Centre should be renovated. When asked what function the Rainbow Centre should be used for after renovation, the majority of participants selected youth centre/drop-in. This reflects a high priority given by the local community throughout the process to the provision of facilities and services for young people. 16% of participants that completed this board selected a gym for inclusion in a renovated Rainbow Centre, again highlighting a desire for this local resource that has been shown in other questions. Participants also selected arts and crafts workshops (14%) and, to a lesser extent, an arts centre (9%) as potential functions of a renovated Rainbow Centre. An arts and crafts exhibition was also the second most popular community event that could be held in the local area. This indicates a strong interest in arts and crafts among the local community, suggesting a desire for projects to increase the provision and promotion of arts and crafts in the area. RELEVANT POLICIES 66 The Argyll and Bute Local Plan emphasises the Council’s commitment to community facilities as ‘the social foundations on which many communities rely on’. The Local Plan supports the development of new services and facilities that support and enhance a community and help retain the local population in the face of a declining number of young economically active families. It also stresses any new facilities or improvements to existing facilities must be in keeping with the character of the town and surrounding area. POTENTIAL PROJECT This currently vacant and neglected community venue could be transferred into community ownership to create a nursery/out of school care, hub for young people and recreation facilities taking account of the need to complement rather than compete with the nearby Cove Burgh Hall. LOCATION Current Ownership of Site The last recorded proprietor of the Rainbow Centre was Dumbarton District Council, the assets of which will have been transferred to either West Dunbartonshire Council or Argyll and Bute Council upon reorganisation of the local authorities in Scotland. The Rainbow Centre is a listed building, Category C(S). COST OF PROJECT £270,000 (assumed gross internal floor area of 190 m2; includes refurbishment internally, external fabric repairs, new entrance feature and external works) POTENTIAL FUNDERS Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Assets stream can support communities to develop community facilities where these are owned and controlled by the local community. Big Lottery Fund can provide up to £1m where there is strong evidence of need for project. A mandate of 10% community support is required for successful projects. The Robertson Trust can support Scottish charities to improve facilities contributing up to 10% of overall capital costs with priorities including young people, education and community sports. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Cove and Kilcreggan Youth Café - If the Trust opted to convert the Rainbow Centre into a youth centre, they could work in partnership with the Cove and Kilcreggan Youth Café to prevent duplication of services and ensure the development of the facility is driven by young people. PROJECT EXMAPLES Cassiltoun Trust The Cassiltoun Trust was set up specifically to undertake the conversion of the Stables Block into a community asset providing offices, a nursery, education and recreation facilities and some housing. Eilean Eisdeal The Trust have converted the old drill hall into a multi-purpose community facility, which provides a centre for community, educational, social and arts activities, with a full arts programme. Muirkirk Enterprise Group The Trust purchased and refurbished a local building as a community facility, which now provides the Trust’s office accommodation, meeting space for community groups and facilities for small business start-ups. 67 Development Trust Association Scotland has prepared a comprehensive report and strategy to support asset transfer of local authority owned facilities to community ownership. Community and Recreation PLAY AREAS AIM The aim of this project is the creation of two children’s play areas. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the output that could be achieved is: • Local children are able to benefit from a local and high quality play areas OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • More activities for children in the local area • Increased interaction between children and parents • Children will be healthier with more opportunities for outdoor play NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need While there is a lower proportion of under 16 year olds in the Peninsula West area than in both Argyll and Bute and Scotland, 29.7% of all households in the Peninsula West area contain dependent children. This is slightly higher than the 26.8% and 28.2% rate of household with dependent children in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. Current Provision in Area There is currently only one play area for local children situated in the park adjacent to the tennis courts and bowling green in Cove/Kilcreggan. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 60% of respondents indicated that play areas were one of their top three environment priorities. Seven comments were also provided expressing a desire for the development or improvement of play areas in the local villages. Community Prioritisation Day Almost a fifth of participants at the community day who completed the relevant board selected play areas as the most important improvement to the villages in the Peninsula West area. This option was selected more than any other option except community woodland. The majority of participants that completed the relevant question indicated that community spaces should be suitable for all ages and comments suggested combining community woodland and play areas. RELEVANT POLICIES The Scottish Government’s Early Years Framework recognises the right of all young children to high quality relationships, environments and services which offer a holistic approach to meeting their needs. This holistic approach encompasses play, learning, social relationships and emotional and physical wellbeing. The development of a play area in the Peninsula West area could contribute towards the achievement of the following aims of the framework: • Ensuring all children have the same outcomes and the same opportunities 68 • Improving outcomes and children’s quality of life through play • Improving play opportunities and addressing barriers to play • Engagement and empowerment of children, families and communities • Helping children, families and communities to secure outcomes for themselves A play area development could contribute to the Scottish Government’s National Outcome and Argyll and Bute Single Outcome Agreement of ‘our children have the best start in life and are ready to succeed’. The development of a play area in the Peninsula West area could also contribute towards the objectives of the Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 by creating ‘high quality leisure/community facilities that attract people to settle in Argyll and Bute’. It could also support the aim of the Argyll and Bute Local Plan ‘to reduce and ameliorate the effects of peripherality – by encouraging the expansion of local facilities throughout Argyll and Bute’. POTENTIAL PROJECT The Trust would work towards the creation of two play areas, one adjacent to the pier in Kilcreggan to be used by visitors and local residents and the other at the site of the existing play area which would be part of the community campus. POTENTIAL LOCATION Within the existing play area park complex which includes the tennis courts and bowling green and at the shoreside in Kilcreggan to the east of the pier. Current Ownership of Site Part of the site surrounding Kilcreggan pier is owned by Scottish Water, while Pier Cottage is owned by the occupier. The remaining area surrounding the pier appears to be until recently owned by McKellar’s Slipway Limited when all or some of the site was disposed to Donald Robert McIndewar Bruce. This potentially includes the site of the old boat yard. COST OF PROJECT £60,000 (adjacent to old tennis courts/new indoor sports centre & youth centre) £280,000 (at the site of the old boat yard, with beach access including perimeter railings) POTENTIAL FUNDERS If the play area is incorporated at least in part in a woodland setting then funding can be secured through Forestry Challenge Fund Forestry for People strand. In addition, Score Environment Landfill Tax is able to contribute on average up to £20,000 with play areas as a priority theme. A further option could be Argyll and the Isles LEADER with recent play area awards covering 50% of costs for a new project in Arrochar 2011. There are advantages to improving existing play areas which are currently owned by Argyll and Bute Council rather than developing new sites. The local community council, for example, could secure funding for new play equipment with the ongoing management, maintenance and public liability being taken forward by the local authority. POTENTIAL PARTNERS 69 Argyll and Bute Council Community Services (Play Areas) – The Trust could arrange a partnership with the relevant Council department for maintenance of any play areas developed. PROJECT EXAMPLES Muirkirk Enterprise Group The group developed two adventure playgrounds for the village of Muirkirk in East Ayrshire. Petersburn Development Trust The Trust was set up to develop Petersburn Park and secured £367,000 worth of funding to create a unique outdoor play facility. The aim was to transform an area of derelict land into a safe environment for young children and families. Business and Housing AFFORDABLE FAMILY HOUSING AIM The aim of this project would be to increase the quantity of affordable housing on the Peninsula suitable for families with young children and first time buyers. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved: • The provision of 94 units of affordable housing for sale or rent to the local community OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • More families with young children attracted to the area • More provision for first time buyers from the community to prevent them having to leave the area to access affordable housing NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need Between 2001 and 2009 the population of the Peninsula West area declined by 4% with the population of children (those aged 16 and under) declining by 23%. The working age population also declined by 7% with only a rise in the pensioner population of almost 24% counteracting these population reductions. This may in part by due to a 125% increase in average house prices in Kilcreggan between 2001 and 2009, higher than the 100% and 103% rise in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. The average house price difference between Kilcreggan and the rest of Argyll and Bute in 2001 was £31,032, while it increased to £89,072 in 2009. Current Provision in Area The average cost of houses sold in the Peninsula West area over 12 months was £192,251.88 (April 2010 – March 2011). Only 10 out of the 32 properties were sold for less than £100,000, making the area difficult for first time buyers and those on low incomes to access (Registers of Scotland House Price Search). COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 70 50% of respondents from all areas selected affordable housing as their top business priority for the Peninsula West area and almost a quarter selected it as top local issue. Fourteen respondents commented on the need for affordable housing in the area, with a further six specifying the need for affordable housing to ensure young families are able to move to the area. Respondents to the survey, from all areas, also prioritised two and three bedroom houses that are suitable for families. Community Prioritisation Event Housing that was suitable for families emerged as the preferred type of housing development for the Peninsula West area, selected by 49% of the participants who completed the Affordable Housing board. This concurred with the desire highlighted by the local community throughout the process to attract young families to ensure the sustainability of the area, with one participant commenting that what was needed in the area was ‘mid affordable housing in order for families in first time housing to move on, thus freeing up houses for first time buyers’. RELEVANT POLICIES The Argyll and Bute Local Plan identifies ‘an ageing population’ and ‘a continuing reduction in the number of young economically active families’ as two key issues faced by the Argyll and Bute Council area. Similarly the Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 aims to create vibrant communities that are ‘well balanced demographically with young people choosing to stay or move to the area’. POTENTIAL PROJECT There are two potential options that the Trust can pursue in the provision of affordable housing in Peninsula West area. Option 1 The Trust itself could purchase land in the Peninsula West area and develop housing. This would potentially require a loan to cover the costs of the land purchase and the housing development, which would be paid back through the income earned on selling or renting the property. However, this would allow the Trust greater control over the housing built and how this was then managed. In addition the Trust could develop a wider employability project into the house building, to employ and train local young and/or unemployed residents. Option 2 The Trust could work in partnership with one of the local housing associations, Dunbritton HA and Argyll Community Housing Association (ACHA). There are no current plans by the housing associations to develop housing in the Peninsula West area and this area is not on the list of areas prioritised by Argyll and Bute Council for housing development. At some point in the future, however, this option would allow the Trust to work in partnership with a housing association for the purchase and development of land for housing. This would reduce the risk taken on by the Trust alone, as capital funding would be raised by the association in part funded by a Housing Association Grant. POTENTIAL LOCATION Community Preference A slightly higher proportion of participants at the community prioritisation event felt affordable housing should be developed by adapting existing buildings in the area than on a vacant site (by 56% to 44% of those that completed this board). However, the majority of participants did indicate that the site above Church Road would be the preferred location for any new housing (62% of participants that completed this board). Current Ownership of Site The south east part of this site is owned by Ishbel Montgomery. 71 COST OF PROJECT £9,800,000 (92 units and including approx 200m access road to site) POTENTIAL FUNDERS Community Land Trust Fund Various funding bodies amalgamated to establish the Community Land Trust Fund (www.cltfund.org.uk). The Technical Assistance Fund (TAF) has been established to provide community groups with a grant of up to £2,500 so that they can employ a consultant or consultants for up to five days to assist with certain aspects of the development of their community land trust, and to work up their initial ideas into a comprehensive business plan that is ‘investment ready’. Forestry Commission: National Forest Land Scheme and Rural Affordable Housing Forestry Commission has a commitment to maximise community access and benefits of FC land through the National Forest Land Scheme (NFLS). Within this remit there are options for community organisations, registered social landlords and other appropriate housing bodies to acquire forest land for affordable housing and woodland crofts. There is considerable forestry land on the Rosneath Peninsula and enquiries could be made to develop these options further. Rural Housing Service The Rural Housing Service is a national charity which helps rural communities to develop practical solutions to local housing problems. The Rural Housing Service provides advice and information on housing issues and aims to help communities create new housing opportunities for local people (www.ruralhousingscotland.org). Option 1 The main source of funding for community land buy-outs is the Big Lottery’s Growing Community Assets Fund. In addition, some funding for support with the development of the buy-out and monies towards the purchase cost of assets including land may be gained from Highlands and Islands Enterprise who offer assistance in the purchase of community assets. Grant is also available from the Scottish Government. Option 2 This option could be funded through a combination of a Housing Association Grant and private finance. When taken forward by community led charitable Trusts there could be options for sourcing ethical investment grants or loans including Triodos Bank loans. Rural Housing Service can provide input and advice with regard to this. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Dunbritton Housing Association/Argyll Community Housing Association – The Trust could work in partnership with one of the local housing associations to develop affordable housing in the area. This would allow access to specific housing association land grants provided by the Scottish Government and ensure less financial risk to the Trust. Argyll and Bute Development Management – The Trust should work with the relevant Argyll and Bute Council department to ensure that any development fits with the council’s priorities and to ensure planning permission. PROJECT EXAMPLES Dunbritton Housing Association 72 Dunbritton Housing Association owns and manages 700 properties across Argyll and Bute. The association has properties in Kilcreggan, Rosneath and Garelochhead. Argyll Community Housing Association (ACHA) ACHA is a community led housing association that manages 5,100 properties transferred from Argyll and Bute Council as well as delivering associated housing services. The association manages properties in Rosneath and Garelochhead. Strathfillan Community Development Trust Since its inception the Trust has successfully implemented a programme of work based on identified community priorities. This has including the provision of low cost rental housing for local residents. Business and Housing NEW BUSINESS WORKSHOP SPACE AIM The aim of this project is the creation of new business workshops in the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved are: • Six new units provided for local businesses OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • Increased business start-ups in the area • Attracting small businesses to the Peninsula West area • Sustainable local businesses and economy, promoting local employment NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need According to the 2001 Census, 30% of economically active residents that both live and work in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area are self-employed (Census, 2001). This is much higher than the 20% rate in Argyll and Bute and the 13% of self-employed residents in Scotland as a whole. Current Provision in Area There are currently retail units along the front in Kilcreggan and Cove, however, the majority of other businesses in the area appear to operate from residential property as opposed to purpose-built workshops. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 16% of respondents to the survey selected small business units as their top priority business issue for the Peninsula West area and 61% selected them as one of their top priorities. The comments regarding this suggested that small businesses were best suited to Peninsula West but highlighted that they would require support in order to be viable in the area. Business Survey Access to business units or workshop space was selected as a top priority business support service for the Peninsula West area by 45% of respondents to the business survey. 73 Community Prioritisation Event 61% of participants at the community event who completed the Business Units board indicated that workshop space was the preferred type of business unit for the Peninsula West area. This was followed by 22% selecting a business centre for the area. RELEVANT POLICIES New business workshop spaces can help contribute to one of the key aims of the Scottish Economic Strategy: to achieve equity by ‘according greater priority to achieving more balanced growth across Scotland, to give all across Scotland the chance to succeed’. The project could also help achieve the Argyll and Bute Local Plan objectives to ‘improve economic competitiveness and the relatively poor economic performance of Argyll and Bute as a whole’ and ‘enhance the economic and social prospects of the geographically diverse local communities in Argyll and Bute’. POTENTIAL PROJECT The project would see the Trust constructing six start up workspaces which would be located on Fort Road adjacent to the existing industrial units. POTENTIAL LOCATION Community Preference 56% of participants that completed the relevant board at the community prioritisation event selected a site at the east end of Fort Road. COST OF PROJECT £500,000 (assumed 200 m2 gross internal floor area; 6 workspaces) POTENTIAL FUNDERS Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Assets is a potential source of funding for this type of community enterprise. Major Lottery funding could be matched by contribution from Scottish Enterprise and charitable trusts such as Gannochy Trust and Lankelly Chase Foundation. Additional funding could possibly be from local private sector sponsorship including businesses that are interested in accessing local ‘work hubs’. PROJECT EXAMPLES Mull and Iona Community Trust The Trust is developing a community business resource centre which offers provision of serviced office and meeting room space with audio-visual technology and a dedicated training room. All facilities will be available for hire on a long or short term with optional reception/secretarial services available. In addition to office space, the resource centre will also contain space for businesses to hire as a ‘surgery/treatment’ room to provide complementary therapies and counselling services at the centre. Govanhill Community Development Trust The Trust is a wholly owned subsidiary of Govanhill Housing Association and was initially established to develop workspaces as a means of developing the local economy. The Trust currently own 2 developments which provide units for 27 small and medium sized enterprises. Ore Valley Business Centre Ore Valley Housing Association has developed a business incubation facility which offers a variety of business spaces for rent. 74 Health and Welfare SHELTERED HOUSING AIM The aim of this project would be to provide sheltered accommodation for elderly residents who are unable to continue to live in unsupported accommodation on the peninsula. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the output that could be achieved is: • The provision of one sheltered accommodation, catering for 12 local residents OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • Elderly residents are able to remain on the Peninsula even when they are unable to live unsupported for health reasons • Increased employment opportunities for local residents NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need Across the Peninsula West area, residents of pensionable age account for over 25% of the total population, higher than the 24% and 19% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. In addition, in one of the data zones (towards the South East of Kilcreggan) pensioners account for almost 30% of all residents in the area. The proportion of pensioners in the entire Peninsula West area increased by almost 25% between 2001 and 2009 and in the Kilcreggan data zone increased by 45% in the same period. This has exacerbated the problems with housing elderly residents in the area and, if the increase continues at this rate, could lead to further problems in the future. Current Provision in Area Dunbritton Housing Association currently have limited amenity housing stock in Rosneath and Garelochhead (15 units) suitable for elderly residents. The next nearest accommodation provided specifically for elderly residents is in Helensburgh where Bield Housing Association operates 12 amenity and 28 sheltered flats. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey A third of total respondents selected sheltered housing as their top health and welfare priority and 68% selected sheltered housing as a top three priority. Overall, just under half of the survey respondents selected sheltered housing as one of their top three priorities. Fifteen respondents commented on the need for housing that is suitable for the elderly and those with health problems in the area, although comments were not specific as to what form this accommodation should take. Community Prioritisation Event Sheltered housing was selected by 42% of participants who completed the relevant board as the most important type of housing development for the Peninsula West area. This reflects a desire by the local community to ensure that the elderly are provided for in the area to prevent them having to leave the Peninsula to access appropriate housing. Three quarters of participants felt that specific elderly housing in the area should provide services for the elderly in general rather than for a specific condition. RELEVANT POLICIES 75 The Scottish Government’s Strategy All Our Futures: Planning for a Scotland with an Ageing Population emphasises that services should be in place to ensure that people can live life to the full as they grow older. In addition, the Argyll and Bute’s Older Persons Charter 2008-10, aims to ‘ensure equity of access to care services throughout the area’ and to ‘make Argyll and Bute a place where older people can live positive, contributing lives as valued citizens’. The Trust can contribute to each of these by providing facilities in the Peninsula West area for older residents to ensure that they are able to continue to live in and contribute to the local community. POTENTIAL PROJECT There are several options to provide sheltered housing that could be developed by the Trust in partnership with specialist housing and/or care providers. The two local general housing associations could be partners or specialist associations such as Bield Housing Association or Hanover Housing Association could lead this project. There may be options for the private sector to provide input or alternatively the Trust could develop this independently as a community or co-operatively run organisation. Latest policies, which include service user and agency evidence, suggest that the demand for the current model of sheltered housing is in longer term decline. There is a growing preference towards the “core and cluster” approach for schemes in which a warden, community alarm and communal facilities will be shared between residents and the other older people living in the vicinity in their own homes irrespective of tenure. This could be a further option to be explored for Cove and Kilcreggan and across the wider Peninsula. POTENTIAL LOCATION Community Preference The Kilcreggan House was selected by the largest proportion of participants (37%), suggesting there is some preference for renovating existing property in the area as opposed to a new development. Current Ownership of Site Kilcreggan House is currently owned by the Way Christian Ministries although it is up for sale at offers around £750,000. COST OF PROJECT £1,130,000 (12 single person units) POTENTIAL FUNDERS Various local and national funders could contribute towards capital development costs such as NHS, Community Health Partnerships, Argyll and Bute Council and Housing Association Grants and related loan schemes. Consideration has to be made towards ongoing running costs and affordability of services long term. If a community owned social care and housing project is pursued then there could be potential to secure Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Asset stream. In addition, several trusts have strong health and care themes such as The Robertson Trust, Henry Smith Charity and Garfield Weston. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Bield Housing/Hanover Housing - The Trust could work with specialist providers of sheltered housing to develop sheltered housing. This would allow access to specific housing association land grants provided by the Scottish Government and ensure less financial risk to the Trust. 76 Dunbritton Housing Association/Argyll Community Housing Association – The Trust could work with one of the local housing associations to develop sheltered housing in the area. This would allow access to specific housing association land grants provided by the Scottish Government and ensure less financial risk to the Trust. PROJECT EXAMPLES Argyll Community Housing Association (ACHA) ACHA is a community led housing association that manages 5,100 properties transferred from Argyll and Bute Council as well as delivering associated housing services. The association provides approximately 200 sheltered units in 11 complexes at Oban, Benderloch, Dunoon, Sandbank, Lochgilphead, Ardrishaig, Inveraray, Tarbert, Bunessan, Rothesay and Bowmore. The majority of these employ wardens to support the tenants by checking on them in the morning, offering advice and organising social and recreational activities. Dunbritton Housing Association Dunbritton Housing Association owns and manages 700 properties across Argyll and Bute, of which around 120 are amenity homes. The association has three general needs units for rent in Craigrownie Gardens in Kilcreggan. Killin Care Trust, Falls of Dochart Retirement Home A rural care home was faced with closure and with the isolation of Killin, the nearest alternative care home would be in Callander or Aberfeldy almost 20 miles way. For many of the older residents that are not able to continue to live independently the alternative would be to have to move from their own community, resulting in isolation from family and friends. When closure was announced in 2002, a group of concerned local people set up the Killin Care Trust to secure funding to retain the retirement home under community ownership. Health and Welfare BEFRIENDING FOR ELDERLY AIM The aim of this project is the development of a befriending service, utilising local volunteers to provide support and companionship to elderly residents. OUTPUTS By the end of this project the outputs that could be achieved are the development of: • The number of contact hours recorded • The number of elderly residents receiving support through the befriending service • The number of local residents engaged in volunteering OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • Reduction in isolation and social exclusion among elderly people in the Peninsula West area • Increased employability of local volunteers NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need Across the Peninsula West area, residents of pensionable age account for over 25% of the total population, higher than the 24% and 19% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. The 77 proportion of pensioners in the entire Peninsula West area increased by almost 25% between 2001 and 2009 and in the Kilcreggan data zone increased by 45% in the same period. Current Provision in Area Despite the high numbers of elderly residents in the Peninsula West area, there is little current provision of befriending services. The nearest identified service is the Cowal Elderly Befriending Scheme which offers a range of befriending services to elderly people in rural areas. This includes oneto-one visiting, trips out and about on a wheelchair accessible minibus and telephone and peerbefriending. Within the immediate area the only befriending services are aimed at carers and children with disabilities rather than elderly residents: • The Princess Royal Trust Helensburgh & Lomond Carers provides support to carers throughout the area including a drop-in service, information and advocacy services, befriending service, social programme and newsletters and publications. • The befriending service offers support to vulnerable children experiencing a range of difficulties, which may include autistic spectrum disorders, in Argyll & Bute by recruiting adult volunteers who are matched up with children on a one-to-one basis. The service also offers befriending to siblings of children with disabilities or difficulties. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 53% of respondents selected befriending for the elderly as one of their top three health and welfare priorities for the Peninsula West area. Nine respondents also commented on the importance of the local provision of services to ensure elderly residents are able to remain in the area. Community Prioritisation Event 46% of participants that completed this board selected the elderly as the group that any new befriending service should focus on, with some support for befriending services for people who are disabled as well. 41% of participants thought that befriending should take the form of assisting with shopping, while 37% thought befriending services should help people attend social events. RELEVANT POLICIES The Scottish Government’s Strategy All Our Futures: Planning for a Scotland with an Ageing Population emphasises that services should be in place to ensure that people can live life to the full as they grow older. In addition, Argyll and Bute’s Older Persons Charter 2008-10, aims to ‘ensure equity of access to care services throughout the area’ and to ‘make Argyll and Bute a place where older people can live positive, contributing lives as valued citizens’. A befriending service for the Peninsula West area would contribute to each of these by providing support and companionship to combat the negative effects of social isolation and ensure elderly residents are able to remain in their own home as long as possible. POTENTIAL PROJECT A number of residents indicated their interest in volunteering for a befriending project. The Trust will facilitate a meeting of any number of volunteers and give assistance through existing befrienders in Argyll and Bute to establish a group for the Rosneath Peninsula. POTENTIAL FUNDERS Big Lottery Fund Investing in Communities: Life Transitions (www.biglotteryfund.org.uk) strand would be the most relevant to assist older people adapt to changes affecting their life including isolation and vulnerability. 78 The Robertson Trust (www.therobertsontrust.org.uk) support Scottish charities to develop community based projects with one of the major priorities covering care initiatives Tudor Trust (www.tudortrust.org.uk) support charities to alleviate poverty with potential for this befriending project to secure funding under the health theme ‘support for older people’ Lloyds TSB Foundation for Scotland Henry Duncan Awards (www.ltsbfoundationforscotland.org.uk) can provide revenue funding support for the befriending service to ensure marginalised people can ‘play a fuller role in the community’. Argyll Voluntary Action (AVA) – AVA currently co-ordinates volunteering across the area and the Trust could work in partnership with them to develop a Time Bank scheme specifically for the Peninsula West area. PROJECT EXAMPLES Volunteer Centre for East Dunbaronshire (VECD) The Befriending Service was first introduced by VCED over 11 years ago and there have since been approximately 300 successful matches. Befriending is a supported relationship between two people who have regular contact for an agreed time and engage in social activities. The befriending relationship is initiated, supported and monitored by Volunteer Centre Befriending Service staff. Befriending aims to make a difference to the quality of life of people experiencing social isolation due to ageing, disability or other changes in their circumstances. Oxgangs Carers Befriending Service The Befriending Service offers clients/carers friendship through one to one contact. This can either be in the persons own home or alternatively if the carer/client wishes, the volunteer befriender can take the person they are matched with out for social activities. The service is available to a range of age groups with a variety of care needs. Transport EVENING PUBLIC TRANSPORT AIM The aim of this project would be to improve the provision of public transport to and from the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the output that could be achieved is: • Increased number of Peninsula West residents who will have a safe and affordable journey home from Helensburgh or Gourock later at night OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • A more accessible area • More attractive area to families • More accessible activities and facilities for young people from the Peninsula West area NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need 79 Elderly residents often suffer the most from poor public transport links and an inability to access wider areas. Across the Peninsula West area, residents of pensionable age account for over 25% of the total population, much higher than the 24% and 19% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. The proportion of pensioners in the entire Peninsula West area increased by almost 25% between 2001 and 2009. Young people unable to access private transport also suffer from poor public transport links. Across the three data zones that comprise the Peninsula West area, 16 – 19 year olds account for 5.35% of the area, higher than the 4.82% and 5.13% in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. Of the 1257 economically active people resident in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area, 67% leave the area for work or study (Census, 2001). 71% of those that leave the Argyll and Bute Council area for work travel over 20km to access their employment each day. The vast majority of these are employed in Inverclyde or Glasgow and therefore a late evening ferry link to allow them to travel home from work is vital. Current Provision in Area Bus services - At present, buses to Helensburgh (service 316) only operate on an hourly basis Monday to Saturday and a two hourly basis on Sundays. This service stops altogether just after ten o’clock Mondays to Sundays. From Helensburgh round to the Peninsula West area, a journey can cost anything between £2.45 and £2.85 and takes approximately 35 to 45 minutes. These services are operated on an alternate basis by Wilson’s of Rhu and Garelochhead Coaches, partly on behalf of SPT. Ferry services -The ferry service between Gourock, Kilcreggan and Helensburgh is operated by Clyde Marine Transport Ltd on behalf of SPT. The ferry does not operate on a consistent basis with half an hour and an hour and a half between consecutive ferries Monday to Saturday and there are only three ferries on a Sunday during the summer period. The last ferry to Kilcreggan from Gourock is just after six o’clock Monday to Saturday and twenty-five past four on Sundays. If commuters are travelling from Glasgow, they have to be on the twenty-five past five train from Glasgow Central to Gourock in order to catch the last ferry to Kilcreggan. This is the only ferry available when leaving Glasgow after 5 o’clock at night, severely limiting options for commuters. A single ferry trip from Gourock to Kilcreggan costs £2.35 and takes just under fifteen minutes. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey Public transport was selected as their top transport priority by over a quarter of respondents to the community survey and as a top three priority by 62%. This was the second most important transport issue after the availability of petrol on the peninsula. Five respondents commented on the need for later bus services while ten comments were left regarding the need for later ferry services in the evenings, particularly to accommodate commuters. Community Prioritisation Event Later bus from Helensburgh - Over half of participants who completed the relevant board at the community day selected ‘around 11’ as the ideal time for the last bus from Helensburgh, with a further 45% selecting midnight. Later ferry from Gourock - 41% of participants selected evening ferry service from Gourock as their most important public transport improvement for the Peninsula West area. 65% of participants completing the board indicated that the ferry from Gourock should continue to operate until around 9pm. 80 RELEVANT POLICIES The national transport strategy, Scotland’s Transport Future 2004, aims to: “promote economic growth, social inclusion, health and protection of our environment through a safe, integrated, effective and efficient transport system.” With regards to the Peninsula West area, the Argyll and Bute Transport Strategy recognises that ‘poor transport services on and across the Clyde river and estuary are currently a constraint on economic development and growth in our commuter belt. As a result the area has not fully benefited from the economic regeneration of Glasgow’. Specific aims of the strategy that improvements to evening public transport to the Peninsula West transport can contribute towards are: • Make it easier to travel by public transport • Increase the number of journeys undertaken by sustainable modes, e.g. bus, train, walk, cycle • Expand the number of accessible and affordable transport links in our area • Encourage Community Transport provision POTENTIAL PROJECT The Trust will work with the Community Council and local transport groups to make requests of the transport providers to alter the times to better suit the local peninsula residents. POTENTIAL FUNDERS Strathclyde Passenger Transport contributes to community transport schemes as well as strategic transport provision including community car share schemes. When led by a community based charity, there are several other potential funders including Trusthouse Charitable Foundation, whose priority is to tackle the affects of rural deprivation. Community transport schemes for the elderly have previously received funding support. Garfield Weston Foundation is another possible funder under their theme to support rural development initiatives. Argyll and the Isles LEADER is a possible source of funding support covering 50% of costs for innovative projects that add to rather than replace statutory responsibilities and infrastructure. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Wilson’s of Rhu – The Trust will need to negotiate with current service providers to encourage increased bus services to the area. Garelochhead Coaches - The Trust will need to negotiate with current service providers to encourage increased bus services to the area. Strathclyde Partnership for Transport – The Trust should work with SPT who co-ordinate public transport services and subsidies local bus and ferry services and who could encourage service providers to change their provision to the area. Clyde Marine Services Limited – The Trust will need to negotiate with current service providers to encourage increased ferry services to the area. 81 Rural Community Transport Initiative – If the Trust were unable to encourage existing bus service providers to alter their services, the Trust could work with the Rural Community Transport Initiative to develop community transport provision. This initiative provides assistance to community and voluntary groups for community transport measures which are of particular help in the more remote areas of Scotland, particularly where there are no scheduled bus services or where services are very limited. Transport COMMUNITY PETROL STATION AIM The aim of this project is the development of a community owned and managed petrol station in the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the output that could be achieved is: • The creation of a self serving petrol station, providing local residents with convenient affordable fuel OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • More accessible fuel making it is easier for residents to travel • More services making the Peninsula West a more attractive place to settle • The Peninsula West area becomes a more attractive place to do business NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need Each of the three data zones in the Peninsula West area are in the 6% most deprived nationally for geographic access to services, with one area (from Cove to Ardpeaton) the 158th most deprived data zone in Scotland in terms of access to services. This is partially due to the high drive times to the nearest petrol station which is calculated as just over fifteen minutes for the purposes of the SIMD. This compares to an average of just over five minutes in Argyll and Bute and less than two minutes across Scotland as a whole. 81% of households in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area have at least one car, while 29% contain two or more. This is much higher than 72% of households in Argyll and Bute as a whole with access to a car with 22% contain two or more. In addition, 43% of those from the Kilcreggan area who are in employment travel to work by car or van, highlighting the high use of fuel within this area (Census, 2001). Current Provision in Area A Google map search found that the nearest regularly open petrol station to Kilcreggan (the Esso in Helensburgh) was located approximately 16 miles away. This would take around 30 minutes and could cost over £4 in petrol to travel to the petrol station. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey Availability of petrol was selected as the top priority by 45% of respondents and as a top three priority by 66% of respondents. Comments on this topic supported any measures to increase the availability of petrol in the area. Business Survey 82 Competitively priced fuel sourcing was selected as a top priority transport issue affecting the day-today running and future development of the respondent businesses. 36% of respondents of the business survey selected this option as their top transport priority and 64% selected it as one of their top three transport priorities for the Peninsula West area. Community Prioritisation Event 69% of the participants who completed the Community Petrol Station board indicated they would only be willing to pay Helensburgh prices at a petrol station on the Peninsula, while a small proportion (23%) suggested they would pay up to 5p more for petrol. 12 of the 13 participants who completed additional questions on transport indicated they would use a petrol station in the Peninsula West area as their main petrol station. RELEVANT POLICIES The development of a petrol station within the Peninsula West area would contribute towards the achievement of two of the Scottish Government’s National Outcomes: • We live in well-designed, sustainable places where we are able to access the amenities and services we need. • We have strong, resilient and supportive communities where people take responsibility for their own actions and how they affect others. The review of the Rural Petrol Stations Grant Scheme in 2004 highlighted that ‘the provision of rural fuel supply is an important contributor to sustaining communities’. This report also suggested that rural petrol stations bring a number of social, economic and environmental benefits to local areas including reduced costs of travel to access fuel, greater community interaction, increased profitability of local businesses, more attractive area to do business, potentially increase tourism and reduced travel time and therefore carbon emissions in accessing fuel. In addition, this project could contribute to the following objectives of the Argyll and Bute Local Plan: • to improve economic competitiveness and the relatively poor economic performance of Argyll and Bute as a whole • to enhance the economic and social prospects of the geographically diverse local communities in Argyll and Bute • to promote appropriate responses to the variety of challenging economic, transport-related and planning circumstances facing these local communities The Argyll and Bute Local Transport Strategy 2007-2010 also highlighted the need to • Encourage a growing and sustainable economy in Argyll and Bute • Improve accessibility for all our communities POTENTIAL PROJECT A community owned petrol station either taken forward by the Trust or through an independent community trading company to take forward community ownership of the new facility. POTENTIAL LOCATION Community Preference 49% of participants at the community prioritisation event who completed the relevant board indicated that a petrol station should be located at the site of the old surgery on Fort Road. This, however, was closely followed by 42% of participants who selected the site next to the fire station in Cove as their preferred location. Current Ownership of Site The north half of the site at the fire station in Cove (4650 square metres) is owned by Scottish Water. 83 At the site of the old surgery, there are two separately owned sites, both of which are owned by the Lomond and Argyll Primary Care National Health Service Trust. COST OF PROJECT £230,000 POTENTIAL FUNDERS Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Assets contributed over £400k to the Trossachs Petrol Station buy-out with community ownership providing both social and economic outcomes. As an innovative project, Argyll and the Isles LEADER would be a further possibility contributing up to 50% of costs and Scottish Enterprise administer the Rural Petrol Station Grant Scheme that could contribute a small amount to this local project. PROJECT EXAMPLES Trossachs Area Community Transport The Group recently completed a community buy-out of Aberfoyle garage site in February 2011. They received funding from the Big Lottery Fund, Forth Valley & Lomond LEADER and Scottish Enterprise under the Rural Petrol Station Grant Scheme to buy, improve and run the local garage site. Morvern Community Development Company In 1999 land adjacent to Lochaline Stores was purchased and developed to construct a petrol and diesel filling station together with additional parking spaces for community use. This facility is leased to Lochaline Stores under a lease and operating agreement. There are also bottle banks and community notice boards on the edge of the petrol station site. MCDC has also been involved in landscaping of the bank below the shop and improvements to the village hall car park which are both under MCDC ownership. Colonsay Community Development Company As part of a commitment to developing a sustainable approach to the regeneration of the island, the Trust run the island’s coal supply and only petrol pump. Applecross Filling Station Petrol station was transferred to community ownership under the Applecross Community Company in July 2010. The stations has unmanned petrol pumps operated via card therefore is available 24 hour. Transport IMPROVEMENT OF PAVEMENTS AIM The aim of this project would be to improve the pavement and path network in the Peninsula West area, specifically the creation of a pavement on the Mill Brae to Barbour Road section of Rosneath Road in Kilcreggan. OUTPUTS By the end of the projects the output that could be achieved is: • 175 metres of pavements provided OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • More accessible paths for all in the Peninsula West area 84 • New and upgraded pavements in the area NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need The pavement on Shore Road ends just after the junction with Fort Road and there is then no footpath on the hill up Mill Brae. As a result, this is a particularly dangerous section of the road for pedestrians. The road connects Rosneath to Kilcreggan and the Peninsula West villages, however, the lack of footpath prevents pedestrians walking across the Peninsula. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey Pavements and paths in the Peninsula West area were selected as a top three priority project by over half of all respondents (55%) to the survey. Fourteen respondents left comments on the need to improve Mill Brae and Barbour Road to ensure safe access to Rosneath from Kilcreggan on foot. Community Prioritisation Event ‘Upgrading existing pavements’ received by far the most selections as the top pavement/path issue in the Peninsula West area. This was followed by ‘creating additional pavements where possible’ and ‘creating a shore front footpath were possible’. Increasing pavement width and addressing overhanging hedges were both selected as top priority issues for improving pavements. 37% of participants that completed this board selected ‘Mill Brae – Barbour Road’ as a priority area for new/upgraded footpaths. RELEVANT POLICIES Argyll and Bute Transport Strategy: • In many of our towns and villages a lack of safe walking and cycling links reduce the opportunities to take part in active travel. • A start has been made on creating new links from towns and villages to schools through the implementation of School Travel Plans and the Safer Routes to Schools initiative. • There is a general lack of fit for purpose cycling / walking routes within local communities. POTENTIAL PROJECT There could be potential to add to this access project by development of paths as part of a training and employment project to deliver wider benefits for those affected by unemployment and poor skills attainment. This could be developed by the Trust in conjunction with Argyll and Bute Employability Team. This model has been used to create a network of new or improved pavements and paths across Helensburgh and Lomond previously. Further input from Argyll and Bute Access Team could support inclusion of any new paths within the core paths plans for the area and consideration should be made to develop routes to an adoptable standard by the local authority. POTENTIAL LOCATION Current Ownership of Site Council owned COST OF PROJECT £60,000 (Approx. 200m in length and 1.20m wide) POTENTIAL FUNDERS New Deal Work Programme will provide input if this is developed as an Employability Project. In addition, with the support of the Access Team there could be further strategic paths funding available from Argyll and Bute Council Access Team or other partners such as Paths for All or Sustrans. 85 Alternatively, the Scottish Rural Development Programme could be accessed for a significant proportion of costs where landowners (including private landowners developing projects of community benefit) could register with Rural Payments SGRPD to secure funding contracts in line with Argyll and Bute SRDP Rural Priorities to promote greater accessibility. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Argyll and Bute Employability Team – If the project had an employability element to it, the Trust could work with the Employability Team. By working in partnership with this department, the Trust would have access to a group of previously unemployed young people and their supervisors who can help arrange and conduct improvements across the Argyll and Bute Council area. Argyll and Bute Access Team – Some of the areas proposed for the development of paths in the Community Plan are included in the Argyll and Bute Core Paths Plan. The Trust could therefore work with the Access Team who are responsible for the development of core paths and could provide support to develop and maintain these paths. Paths for All – Paths for All is an existing project to develop paths across Scotland. The Trust could work in partnership with this group to utilise their contacts and experience when developing paths in the Peninsula West area. Argyll and Bute Council Roads Department – As some of the proposed paths will be owned by the Council, the Trust should also work with the Roads department to develop a long term maintenance plan for any improvements. PROJECT EXAMPLES Newburgh Community Trust In 2006 there was the opportunity to purchase some of the town waterfront. The sea wall and the three piers have lain neglected for half a century and through the Land Reform Act, the Trust was able to take the opportunity to purchase these and regain part of the area’s heritage. This occurred just after the community informally converted a former factory site into a recreational park. The group has upgraded the riverside path as part of a much wider network of paths in the local area. Birse Community Trust BCT manages parish wide natural heritage, cultural heritage and footpath programmes together with a wide range of community development projects and many related activities including the publication of local books. Employment & Tourism MARINE ACCESS FACILITY AIM The aim of this project is the development of a new and improved marine access facility for the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the output that could be achieved is: • A new marine access facility suitable for non-commercial, private and visiting craft OUTCOMES 86 The associated outcome would be: • More tourists are able to access the Peninsula West area, boosting local businesses NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need Of the 1257 economically active people resident in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area, 67% leave the area for work or study with only 27% working in the area (Census, 2001). 71% of those that leave the Argyll and Bute Council area for work travel over 20km to access their employment each day. The vast majority of these will be employed in Inverclyde or Glasgow and an upgraded marine facility and improved ferry link would greatly benefit them. Current Provision in Area There is a pier in the centre of Kilcreggan, from which a ferry operates to Gourock and Helensburgh. This currently operates approximately 13 times between 7 am and 6pm every weekday with up to an hour and a half between consecutive ferries. There are also three ferries on a Sunday during the summer period. The Cove Sailing Club also has small pier for member and visitor yachts to berth. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 53% of respondents indicated this was one of their top three environment priorities for the Peninsula West area. Ten additional comments were also left by respondents highlighting the need for improvements to the current pier to increase tourist numbers and make the Peninsula West area more accessible to all. Community Prioritisation Event Of those that completed the Marine Access Facility board, 63% prioritised the creation of a new marine access facility/community pontoon over improvements to the existing pier or the development of an overnight berth. RELEVANT POLICIES The Argyll and Bute Local Plan aims ‘to promote appropriate responses to the variety of challenging economic, transport-related and planning circumstances facing these local communities’ and ‘to enhance the economic and social prospects of the geographically diverse local communities in Argyll and Bute’. In addition, the Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009 – 2013 aims to create vibrant communities with outstanding environment that are ‘well connected economically and socially’ and ‘accessible, yet retaining their remote character’. The development of a new marine access facility in the Peninsula West area will also contribute towards the aims of the Argyll and Bute Local Transport Strategy 2007-2010 to ‘encourage a growing and sustainable economy in Argyll and Bute and ‘improve accessibility for all our communities’. This strategy currently includes a commitment to upgrading the pier at Kilcreggan in the period 2010 to 2015, with £1.5 million allocated for both the Kilcreggan and Helensburgh piers. This project could also contribute to the ‘Wealthier and Fairer’ and ‘Safer and Stronger’ strategic objectives of the Scottish Government by promoting tourism, improving access to local businesses, improving opportunities and providing a better quality of life for local residents by increasing access to the Peninsula West area. 87 POTENTIAL PROJECT The Trust would look to construct a variety of marine access facilities to allow residents and visitors to launch and moor boats and small craft at a new marine access point taking advantage of the site and situation from the existing pier east to the old boat yard. COST OF PROJECT £200,000 (including lighting) POTENTIAL LOCATION Community Preference Almost two thirds of those that completed the relevant board selected the old boat yard as the preferred location of a new marine access facility, over any upgrade to the existing pier in Kilcreggan or the Sailing Club. Current Ownership of Site Part of the site surrounding Kilcreggan pier is owned by Scottish Water, while Pier Cottage is owned by the occupier. The remaining area surrounding the pier appears to be until recently owned by McKellar’s Slipway Limited when all or some of the site was disposed to Donald Robert McIndewar Bruce. This potentially includes the site of the old boat yard. POTENTIAL FUNDERS The Scottish Government’s Scottish Rural Development Programme is a potential funder for this project to revitalise social and economic wellbeing of the area. As the development is on the Crown Estate (seabed), the project could secure funding through Marine Communities Fund if the project is not seen to replace statutory responsibility. There is existing commitment from Argyll and Bute Council to invest in the existing pier and dialogue is needed to identify further match needed. As a historic structure (B-listed Victorian pier), there is funding potential to enhance the pier as long as this does not detract from the historical significance of the pier. Heritage Lottery Fund (www.hlf.org.uk) could be a source of funding support where community are involved in participating and learning about the historical significance of the pier. The Architectural Heritage Fund (www.ahfund.org.uk) can fund both feasibility studies and offer grants and affordable loans for relevant projects linked to the pier. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Argyll and Bute Council Roads and Amenity Services – The Trust should work with the relevant Argyll and Bute Council department to ensure that any development fits with the council’s priorities. Within the Local Plan, the Council set out an intention to conduct improvements to Kilcreggan Pier. The Trust should negotiate with the Council to determine their plans and whether the Council would fund the group to undertake them on their behalf. McKellar’s Slipway Limited – McKellar’s Slipway Limited are the current owners of Kilcreggan Pier and the Trust should work in partnership with them to develop a new pier suitable to meet the local community’s demand as well as suitable for existing commercial purposes. PROJECT EXAMPLES Newburgh Community Trust 88 The trust purchased the sea wall and three of the former industrial piers and is applying for grants in order to repair and upgrade these to allow commercial and recreational boats to visit. Eilean Eisdeal The trust purchased the harbour and some adjoining land and then refurbished the harbour, improved facilities and organised moorings for islanders and visitors. Eday Partnership The Trust has built a new slipway which will be complemented by the installation of 4 mooring buoys, a new shed and a marshalling yard which are currently under construction at the pier. Employment & Tourism COMMUNITY FESTIVALS AIM The aim of this project is the development of festivals organised by the local community to attract tourist to the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved are: • The creation of four annual festivals • A rise in footfall through the villages OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • Increased tourism to the Peninsula West area • Promotion of businesses and individuals from the Peninsula West area • Increased community interaction in the area NEED FOR PROJECT Current Provision in Area Various local community groups hold events in the Cove Burgh Hall such as film nights, theatre shows and music concerts. However, these are held for the local community and not advertised to attract tourists to the area. Within the wider Helensburgh and Lomond area there are some festivals held to attract tourism including the Lomond Folk Festival, Helensburgh and Lomond Real Ale Festival, Clanscape and Loch Lomond Shores Farmers Market. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 18% of respondents selected organised community events to promote tourism as their top employment priority for the Peninsula West area and 55% selected as one of their top three employment priorities. Community Prioritisation Event In total, 222 selections for potential events were made, suggesting strong support for hosting festivals in the local area in order to attract tourism. The event that the largest proportion (20%) of those that completed the board would like to see in the local area was a music festival. This was closely followed by an arts/crafts exhibition, Regatta festival and Celtic festival. RELEVANT POLICIES 89 Scottish Tourism: The Next Decade outlines the predicted change in tourism in Scotland over the next ten years including that ‘the vast majority of visitors will live within a 3-hour travelling distance of their final destination in Scotland. Visitors will want self-discovery and chances to try new things and will be ever better travelled and more sophisticated, with an interest in culture and the arts, high and low brow. They will be looking for rich opportunities to experience authentic Scotland and will be turned off by any hint of a tourist trap’. This plan aims to increase tourism in Scotland by 50% by 2015 (from 2005 rates). Festivals to promote tourism in the Peninsula West area will also contribute to one of the aims of the Argyll and Bute Corporate Plan to improve the economy of the local authority area by ‘developing Argyll and Bute as a quality destination, creating higher quality jobs and extending the tourism season’. POTENTIAL PROJECT The Trust will assist in the co-ordination of a series of annual and bi-annual events which will be aimed at both residents and visitors alike. Some of these will build on previous successes such as the Regatta Week, while others will promote themes such as music, culture and architectural and natural history. POTENTIAL LOCATION The events would be located throughout settlements and sites in the various villages throughout the peninsula. POTENTIAL FUNDERS EventScotland’s National Funding Programme aims to develop domestic tourism across Scotland and can provide some funding towards marketing costs to increase the reach of the event. The National Events Programme can provide funding of between £4,000 and £25,000 for up to 25% of the costs of events which: • generate economic benefits for specific regions of Scotland • attract visitors to specific regions of Scotland from other parts of the country and beyond • enhance the profile and appeal of the host region • inspire and involve local communities • have measurable outcomes Creative Scotland (www.creativescotland.com) is the national arts body and arts lottery funding provider, promoting investment across all sectors of arts in Scotland and providing investment for national and regional organisations both for specific arts mediums and for flexible funded projects. Funding for 2011/12 is fully committed, however, there are possible funding options going forward for 2012 together with advice and other resources. Esmee Fairbairn Foundation (www.esmeefairbairn.org) provides funding for general charitable causes but has a long standing priority to develop the arts with particular emphasis on projects of national significance. The Robertson Trust (www.therobertsontrust.org.uk) provides funding for Scottish based charities and community projects with a thematic priority towards community arts where arts projects address wider social needs such as health and education. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Event Scotland/Visit Scotland – The Trust could work in partnership with Event Scotland and Visit Scotland to develop a project to increase tourism through community events. This would ensure 90 tourism projects in the area tied into events in wider Scotland as well as increasing the scale and potential audience for the event. PROJECT EXMAPLES Prestoungrange Arts Festival The Prestoungrange Arts Festival (PAFS) started 10 years ago, first as an initiative to record the history of Prestonpans, then as a means of using various heritage and arts projects to regenerate the area and enrich the community. Its founder was Dr Gordon Prestoungrange, the Baron of Prestoungrange, but PAFS is now managed by a group of directors drawn from the community. A programme of mural painting on walls throughout Prestonpans was started in 2001, inspired by Chemainus in Canada where murals have made the town a tourist destination and regenerated the economy following the closure of its main industry. This was the start of a Global Mural Arts Association with members across the world. Prestonpans was the first European member and hosted the Murals Conference in 2006. Balerno Village Trust The group started a successful monthly farmers market (established in 2005) and an annual music festival in partnership with the local church and folk club (started in 2008). Ballater (RD) LTD The group organises a walking festival which raises approximately £20,000 for the local economy and maintains two websites supporting and promoting the local area. Strathmore & The Glens Rural Partnership The group is currently involved in organising and promoting a number of initiatives such as the Blairgowrie & East Perthshire Walking Festival, Blairgowrie Community Markets, Better Place to Live Fairs, Stride for Life Walks, Strathmore Centre for Youth Dialogue, Art Festival and a website which includes maintenance of on-line business and voluntary organisation directories. Employment and Tourism NURSERY & AFTER SCHOOL CARE AIM The aim of this project is the creation of an after school care and nursery service within the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS By the end of this project, the outputs that could be achieved are: • The provision of nursery places for children aged 6 months to school age and the provision of a number of after school club places OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • More opportunities for parents to access employment through the provision of affordable, local childcare • More facilities in the Peninsula West area to attract families with young children to settle in the area NEED FOR PROJECT Statistical Evidence of Need 91 While there is a lower proportion of under 16 year olds in the Peninsula West area than in both Argyll and Bute and Scotland, 29.7% of all households in the Peninsula West area contain dependent children. This is slightly higher than the 26.8% and 28.2% rate of household with dependent children in Argyll and Bute and Scotland respectively. Of the 1257 economically active people resident in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area, 67% leave the area for work or study, 6% do not work or study and only 27% work in the area (Census, 2001). 56% of the 581 parents in the Rosneath, Clynder and Kilcreggan area are part of a couple with dependent children and both working (Census, 2001). This affects the need for an after school care/nursery service as there are high levels of working parents and people leaving the area to access employment. Current Provision in Area Kilcreggan Primary School has a Pre Five Unit which provides care for three to five year olds between 9.30am and 11.30am Monday to Friday. There is also a private nursery, Kiddlywinks Nursery, located in Clynder for two to five year olds which operates Monday to Friday, 8.30am to 4.00pm. There are four nurseries, two out of school care providers and two crèches located in Helensburgh but nothing nearer to the Peninsula West area. Every Wednesday during term times there is a ‘stay and play’ toddler group at Cove Burgh Hall for 0 to 5 year olds. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey While crèche facilities/after school care was rated as the second employment priority overall and by Kilcreggan respondents, those from Ardpeaton, Peaton and other selected this as their top employment priority. Crèche facilities/after school care was selected as a top employment priority by almost a third of all respondents to the survey and 60% of respondents selected this option as one of their top three employment priorities. Community Prioritisation Event Of those present at the community day that did answer the relevant question, 86% indicated that they would use a nursery/preschool/after school care facility at least three days a week, with 38% suggesting they would use this facility five days a week. RELEVANT POLICIES The Scottish Government’s Early Years Framework recognises the right of all young children to high quality relationships, environments and services which offer a holistic approach to meeting their needs. This holistic approach encompasses play, learning, social relationships and emotional and physical wellbeing. The development of an after school care/nursery facility in the Peninsula West area could contribute towards the achievement of the following aims of the framework: • Parents are supported to access employment and training to help reduce the risk of child poverty, including through the provision of flexible, accessible and affordable childcare • Ensuring all children have the same outcomes and the same opportunities • Engagement and empowerment of children, families and communities • Helping children, families and communities to secure outcomes for themselves An after school care/nursery facility could contribute to the Scottish Government’s National Outcome and Argyll and Bute Single Outcome Agreement of ‘our children have the best start in life and are ready to succeed’. The project could support the aim of the Argyll and Bute Local Plan ‘to reduce and ameliorate the effects of peripherality – by encouraging the expansion of local facilities throughout Argyll and Bute’. 92 POTENTIAL PROJECT The Trust could support a not for profit community nursery based in the Rainbow Centre with an after school care project linked to this or based in the school. Current Ownership of Site Rainbow Centre is currently owned by Dumbarton District Council. POTENTIAL FUNDERS Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Assets (www.biglotteryfund.org.uk) may be a possible source of funding for capital and ongoing revenue costs where the community owns and controls the project as a social enterprise. NHS Highland (Argyll and Bute Community Health Partnership, www.nhshighland.scot.nhs.uk) and Argyll and Bute Council are potential sources of support and funding where there is a strategic and social need for child care provision (as opposed to purely commercial enterprise). Liaison with strategic partners to identify needs and potential ongoing support is crucial. BBC Children In Need is able to cover costs for projects to improve children’s quality of life where there is strong evidence of disadvantage. In this case perhaps rural disadvantage may be an element to emphasise. Some capital elements may be eligible but main focus would be on staff costs. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Kilcreggan Primary Pre-five Unit – The Trust should work in partnership with the existing pre-five unit in Kilcreggan to ensure there is no duplication of services. The Trust could also determine if and where the Trust could further develop the existing provision to establish a more comprehensive nursery and after school care provision in the Kilcreggan area. PROJECT EXAMPLES Cairndow Community Childcare Cairndow Community Childcare is a small rural centre providing childcare for residents and visitors in a safe, stimulating and friendly environment. It is run as a community business and provides affordable childcare including pre school education, after school care and holiday clubs as a facility for the local area. Happy Days Community Nursery and Safe ‘Til Six Out of School Care The community nursery and after school care organisations operate within Maryhill Community Central Hall and are managed by a voluntary board of directors. Happy Days Community Pre-school Nursery has been operating since 1991 and is now registered to provide education and care for 49 children aged 0-5 with 10 members of staff employed in the nursery. The Safe ‘til Six Out of School Care was set up in1977 by a group of local parents concerned about the number of children going home alone and is now registered to care for 89 children aged 5-14. Employment & Tourism WATERSPORTS CENTRE & MARINA AIM The aim of this project is the development of an expanded water sports complex and sailing club in the Peninsula West area. OUTPUTS 93 By the end of the project the output that could be achieved is: • A new/redeveloped water sports/sailing club facility in the Peninsula West area open to residents and visitors to the area OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • High quality water sports facilities for the local community to promote healthy living • Additional facilities to attract tourism to the area • Increased employment opportunities in the local area NEED FOR PROJECT Current Provision in Area Cove Sailing Club currently provides marina facilities along with a variety of sailing-oriented events. However, a membership is required in order to use the facilities at the Sailing Club, meaning this is not open to visitors to the Peninsula West area or residents for occasional use only. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey Over two thirds of respondents to the community survey selected improvements to outdoor sports facilities as a top three community priority, 62% selected improved business opportunities through tourism as a top three employment priority and 61% of respondents selected tourist facilities/attractions as a top three business priority for the Peninsula West area. Community Prioritisation Event 30% of those that completed the relevant board selected sports facilities/water sports as the preferred tourist attraction in the area. On a separate board, over a quarter of participants suggested the Trust should promote water sports to attract tourists to the area. 34 participants selected a Regatta festival as a preferred community event to promote tourism in the Peninsula West area. RELEVANT POLICIES The development of sports facilities in the Peninsula West area that are accessible all year round would contribute towards the Scottish Government’s Healthier strategic objective to ‘help people to sustain and improve their health, especially in disadvantaged communities, ensuring better, local and faster access to health care’. The Scottish Government Strategy for the wider impact of the Commonwealth Games, A Games Legacy for Scotland, aims to create a network of community sports hubs across Scotland to improve the use of, and access to, facilities for physical activity and competitive sport. Community sports hubs can be based in local facilities such as sports centres, community centres and/or schools and will serve as a home for local clubs and sports and provide information and advice to local people, bringing together communities. The Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013 also has a commitment towards creating vibrant communities through ‘high quality public services and leisure/community facilities that attract people to settle in Argyll and Bute’ and forward looking communities which are ‘proactive communities where local people and organisations look for and create opportunities’. The development of sports facilities as part of a marina development could contribute to both these aims of Argyll and Bute’s Community Planning Partnership. POTENTIAL PROJECT 94 The Trust could work with the Sailing Club to redevelop the existing Sailing Club buildings, incorporating additional indoor sports facilities to complement its existing outdoor sports facilities. Membership of the Sailing Club could be expanded to both subsidise the existing and increased functions of the Sailing Club. Current Ownership of Site The current proprietors of the Cove Sailing Club site are the Trustees for Cove Sailing Club. POTENTIAL FUNDERS Sports Scotland is the national sports development body which also distributes lottery funding for strategic sports projects there could be potential funding if the water sports facility was of national and/or regional significance and delivered wider public benefits rather than for private members only. Affiliation with National Water Sports Councils including Scottish Sailing Institute would be required to ensure strategic support for the initiative. Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Assets could be a possibility if there are wider social goals incorporated into the project POTENTIAL PARTNERS Cove Sailing Club – The current owners of the Sailing Club who would have an interest in any development which improves sailing provision. The Trust should work in partnership with this group to build on their current provision and plans for water sports provision. Physical Environment IMPROVEMENT OF FORESHORE AIM The aim of this project is the improvement of appearance and access to the foreshore across the Peninsula West area for the benefit of local residents and tourists. OUTPUTS By the end of the project the outputs that could be achieved are: • Creation of walkway along the shore side of Shore Road • Creation of five beach access points • Elimination of knotweed along the foreshore to allow improved access • The provision of sculptures, litter bins, benches and signage along the foreshore OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • Improved appearance of Peninsula West area • More attractive tourist destination • More accessible paths for all in the Peninsula West area • Upgraded pavements in the area • Increased use of the area’s natural resources for the benefit of the local community NEED FOR PROJECT Current Provision in Area Many parts of the foreshore are currently inaccessible due to a lack of access points and high levels of knotweed. There is no footpath on the shore side of Shore Road for the majority of the Peninsula West. 95 COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 73% of respondents selected improvements of foreshore as one of their top three environment priorities. Pavements and paths in the Peninsula West area were selected as a top three priority project by over half of all respondents (55%) to the survey. Improvements to the foreshore was selected as a top three environment priority by 73% of respondents to the community survey. Nine respondents also left comments specifically calling for a path to be created along the shore front. The appearance of the village generally was selected as the second priority overall, as a top priority by 30% of respondents and as one of their top three priorities by 70% respondents. Community Prioritisation Event A path along the shore was selected by 41% of those that completed the relevant board as the most desired improvement to the foreshore. This reflects the location in which most participants indicated they would like to see new paths and pavements developed. 30% of participants also indicated that litter bins should be provided in order to improve the appearance of the area. Better access to the foreshore was selected by 16% of participants that completed this question. ‘Upgrading existing pavements’ received by far the most selections as the top pavement/path issue in the Peninsula West area. This was followed by ‘creating additional pavements where possible’ and ‘creating a shore front footpath where possible’. Increasing pavement width and addressing overhanging hedges were both selected as top priority issues for improving pavements. 47% of those that completed the board wished a new footpath on Shore Road. Community sculptures and benches were selected as the fourth and fifth prioritised improvements to the Peninsula West area. 30% of participants that completed the board selected litter bins and litter pickings as an environmental issue to be addressed by the Trust. RELEVANT POLICIES Improvements to the foreshore in the Peninsula West area could contribute to the achievement of one of the Scottish Government’s National Outcomes: ‘we value and enjoy our built and natural environment and protect it and enhance it for future generations’. This project could contribute to the following outcomes of the Argyll and Bute Local Plan: • to treat the rich natural and historic environment of Argyll and Bute as a not fully realised economic asset which, if safeguarded and enhanced, can stimulate further investment and increased economic activity • to safeguard the diverse and high quality natural and built heritage resources, including the abundant landward and maritime biodiversity of Argyll and Bute The Invasive Non-Native Species Framework Strategy for Great Britain 2008 is a joint approach between the British, Scottish and Welsh Assembly Governments and it outlines actions to address the problems caused by invasive non-native species. This highlights that ‘invasive non-native species of flora and fauna are considered the second biggest threat after habitat loss and destruction to biodiversity worldwide and the greatest threat to fragile ecosystems such as islands’. In order to achieve this, the strategy outlines commitments to embracing individual initiatives, encouraging effective partnerships and looking for further ways to support individuals in tackling the problems caused by invasive non-native species. The Argyll and Bute Transport Strategy highlights the key issues surrounding the provision of paths in the local authority area that a project to create a path along the front can help tackle: 96 • A lack of safe walking and cycling links in many of our towns and villages reduces the opportunities to take part in active travel. • There is a general lack of fit for purpose cycling and walking routes within local communities. POTENTIAL PROJECT The Trust and associated interest groups will take forward a series of linked projects combined to enhance the foreshore through improved access, additional signage and litter bins, the introduction of a series of information points and the introduction of a footpath along an extended section of the foreshore. In addition to these items, the Trust’s Environmental Group and others will continue the regular treatment for the reduction and long term removal of the knotweed issue. The Trust will also consider the creation of a series of focal points such as a band stand, open air venue and play area which will appeal to residents and visitors alike. COST OF PROJECT £70,000 (information points, signage, benches, litter bins) POTENTIAL LOCATION Current Ownership of Site The majority of foreshore in the UK, defined as the area between mean high water and mean low water (spring tides in Scotland), is owned by Crown Estates. However, in 1973 the Cove and Kilcreggan Trust took over most of the foreshore area within Cove and Kilcreggan to ensure that the management and control of the foreshore was maintained by local people. Over the years the Trust has, so far as within the limits of its resources, endeavoured to maintain the main areas of the foreshore to which the public have access. POTENTIAL FUNDERS Creative Scotland (formerly Scottish Arts Council) has recently launched its new investment programme with 15 new strands of investments for arts and culture, lead by not for profit organisations and individuals. The most relevant strands are for arts events and festivals (e.g. sculpture art festival) and capital programme £10k - £100k on basis of one of the priorities being to promote investment in places and engaging artists (e.g. public arts sculpture trail). Scottish Rural Development Programme (SRDP) under their ‘thriving rural communities priorities’ package to improve community facilities, improve access routes and facilities, and improve recreation facilities in your local area. This can link with local authority core paths plans in conjunction with A&B Access Forum. Paths for All is able to support local health walking initiatives with funding to help get projects started. For community based work Paths for All have small grants (up to £2,000) and large grants (up to £40,000) available and development staff can offer advice on funding as well as advice on setting up local health walk groups, volunteer action teams and technical advice on paths specifications. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Cove and Kilcreggan Trust – The Trust owns the majority of the foreshore and is committed to maintaining it for the local community. The Trust should therefore work in partnership with this group to build on their work maintaining the foreshore and utilise their expertise and resources in this area. Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) – SEPA are specialist in the removal non-native invasive species and in the past have been involved in implementing community projects to target this. 97 PROJECT EXAMPLES Newburgh Community Trust In 2006, there was the opportunity to purchase some of the town waterfront. The sea wall and the three piers have lain neglected for half a century and through the Land Reform Act, the Trust was able to take the opportunity to purchase these and regain part of the area’s heritage. The group has upgraded the riverside path as part of a much wider network of paths in the local area. Dumfries and Galloway Riparian Non-Native Species Project This project involved a partnership between SEPA, Nith District Salmon Fishery Board (DSFB), Annan DSFB, Solway Heritage, Galloway Fisheries Trust and the Criminal Justice Service. The aim of the project was to tackle the spread of Japanese Knotweed, Himalayan Balsam and Giant Hogweed on a river catchment scale across the Rivers Nith and Annan to reduce their extent on the local environment. Control work is being undertaken over 5 years by the District Salmon Fishery Boards, as well as an education leaflet with reporting strip, website and public awareness raising for unknown and emerging invasive species. Ayrshire Rivers Trust (ART) Since 2008 ART have been undertaking a control programme of Giant Hogweed on rivers and burns throughout Ayrshire. Himalayan Balsam and Japanese Knotweed within the Doon catchment was then targeted which was possible due to funding received from SEPA’s restoration fund and the Doon Salmon Fishery Board. ART also trained volunteers from angling clubs in the safe use of pesticides and during the season; these volunteers have actively been targeting their local waters with good results. Physical Environment COMMUNITY WOODLAND AIM The aim of this project is the creation of community woodland space for local residents of all ages to enjoy in the Peninsula West area OUTPUTS By the end of the project the output that could be achieved is: • Woodland located and transferred to community ownership for use by the local community OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • More facilities for local people to use • A healthier community, with people spending more time outdoors NEED FOR PROJECT Current provision in Area There is no community woodland on the western side of the peninsula, the only similar facility being situated at Clachan Glen in Rosneath. COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Community Survey 30% of respondents selected the appearance of the villages as their top environment priority for the Peninsula West area with 70% selecting it as one of their top three priorities. 60% of respondents also indicated that community gardens and woodlands were one of their top three environment priorities. 98 Community Prioritisation Event Almost a fifth of participants at the community day who completed the relevant board selected community woodland as the most important improvement to the villages in the Peninsula West area. This option was selected more than any other option except play areas. Comments suggested that projects should aim to promote biodiversity, protect the nature conservation area at Fort Road and combine community woodland and play area. RELEVANT POLICIES Community woodland would contribute to the achievement of one of the Scottish Government’s national outcomes: ‘we value and enjoy our built and natural environment and protect it and enhance it for future generations’. The development of a community woodland would contribute to the following outcomes of the Argyll and Bute Local Plan: • to treat the rich natural and historic environment of Argyll and Bute as a not fully realised economic asset which, if safeguarded and enhanced, can stimulate further investment and increased economic activity • to safeguard the diverse and high quality natural and built heritage resources, including the abundant landward and maritime biodiversity of Argyll and Bute The project could also contribute to the following objectives of the Argyll and Bute Community Plan 2009-2013: • high quality environment that is valued, recognised and protected • an area that is accessible, yet retains its remote character • proactive communities where local people and organisations look for and create opportunities The Argyll and Bute Woodlands and Forestry Strategy aims to promote the woodland and forests of Argyll and Bute as they: “ make a significant contribution to climate change mitigation, have significant levels of economic value retained locally, enhance biodiversity and environmental quality and support the further development of recreation opportunities for the benefit and well-being local people and visitors alike.” POTENTIAL PROJECT Developing a community woodland at Fort Road woodland which will include new paths, enhanced biodiversity, natural play areas and will be developed using a programme of conservation events and activities. Access and Lease agreements need to be in place with owners of the site to secure funding and consideration needs to be made with regard to public liability and ongoing management and maintenance of the woodland and any developments. POTENTIAL LOCATION Community Preference Fort Road woodland was identified as the preferred woodland area for this project. POTENTIAL FUNDERS Forestry Commission operate a Challenge Fund to promote social value and community use of woodland and Kilcreggan and Cove would be eligible to apply for the Forestry For People strand of funding (areas of existing woodland with community access over 1ha in size). This can cover both capital and revenue costs for community activities including structured volunteering, training and conservation events to develop and use community woodlands. 99 Scottish Rural Development Programme now include Scottish Natural Heritage grants under their umbrella and there could be potential to secure funding under landscape, biodiversity, access and community strands. Heritage Lottery Fund (Your Heritage up to £50,000) could contribute to such projects celebrating both natural and social heritage aspects although there has to be strong community involvement in learning about and participating in development of a community woodland. POTENTIAL PARTNERS Perth and Argyll Conservancy – Perth and Argyll Conservancy provide local services for the Forestry Commission. The Trust could work with this group to develop a plan to increase woodland in the Peninsula West area. PROJECT EXAMPLES Strathfillan Community Development Trust The Trust manage 95 hectares of community woodland (of which they own 10 hectares) in the villages of Crianlarich and Tyndrum in the Forth Valley. Birse Community Trust The Trust holds ancient shared rights over the Forest of Birse Commonty (c.3750 ha) and the native pinewoods there (c.550 ha) and manages land and buildings at a dozen sites spread across the parish, including five local woodlands with a total area of approximately 1,000 hectares. Physical Environment WIND FARM AIM The aim of this project is the creation of a wind farm development in the Peninsula West area to raise income for investment in community projects led by RPWCDT. OUTPUTS By the end of this project the outputs that could be achieved are: • The erection of wind turbines • The generation of electricity for use locally and for sale to the grid • Profit raised to be reinvested in community projects OUTCOMES The associated outcomes would be: • Income generation to fund projects for the benefit of the local community • Contribute to the reduction in carbon emissions to combat climate change • Create job opportunities in the Peninsula West area COMMUNITY DEMAND FOR PROJECT Windfarm Survey 92% (435 individuals) of those surveyed indicated that the Trust should progress a wind farm project, meaning at least 34% of the total population (1268 individuals) of the Peninsula West area support this development. Community Survey 100 There were no questions directly relating to renewable energy in the community survey. However, nine respondents commented on the benefits that renewable energy could bring to the Peninsula West area including keeping fuel costs low and improving the appearance of the area. RELEVANT POLICIES The relevant Scottish Government targets which a renewable energy development in the Peninsula West area could contribute towards are: • Reducing carbon emissions by 80% by 2050 • Supporting the EU target of 20% of Europe’s energy requirements being met from renewable resources by 2020 • 50% of Scottish demand for electricity should be met from renewable sources by 2020 In order to achieve these targets the Scottish Government outlines the following action related to the wind farm development by the RPWCDT: ‘We will actively promote community led energy generation and energy saving projects. Such approaches can stimulate communities to take their activism into wider areas and promote community regeneration.’ A wind farm development can contribute to the achievement of the vision of the Argyll and Bute Renewable Energy Action Plan 2010-2013: ‘Argyll and Bute will be at the heart of renewable energy development in Scotland by taking full advantage of its unique and significant mix of indigenous renewable resources and maximising the opportunities for sustainable economic growth for the benefit of its communities and Scotland.’ Specifically, this project will contribute to the following priorities of the Argyll and Bute Renewable Energy Action Plan: • Secure related benefits for the communities of Argyll and Bute, including the more peripheral, remote and economically fragile communities • Support locally owned community based renewable projects • Develop the industry in a manner that promotes long term sustainability and recognises the need for co-existence with our communities, other economic activities and our outstanding environment • Protect our unique environment whilst at the same time securing economic benefit for our communities. In addition, the development of renewable energy in the Peninsula West area will contribute towards the Scottish Government and Argyll and Bute Council outcomes of: • We realise our full economic potential with more and better employment opportunities for our people • We have strong, resilient and supportive communities where people take responsibility for their own actions and how they affect others • We value and enjoy out built and natural environment and protect it and enhance it for future generations • We reduce the local and global environmental impact of our consumption and production POTENTIAL PROJECT A preferred site has been identified north of Cove which has adequate height to maximise wind capture. The desk top research phase of the project identified initial viability which needs to be investigated over 12 month period and this feasibility study is ongoing. The Trust is confident of positive outcomes to take this project forward. POTENTIAL FUNDERS CARES Community Energy Scotland Loan Scheme Community Energy Scotland (www.communityenergyscotland.org.uk) provides funding and technical support to those communities who are developing income-generating projects such as community wind farms. 101 Big Lottery Fund Growing Community Assets (www.biglotteryfund.org.uk) may contribute to development of sustainable energy projects that bring real and lasting legacies to their local communities. Scottish Rural Development Programme (SRDP, www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Rural/SRDP) brings together a number of funding schemes, some of which are part-funded by Europe. The most likely sources of funding in the SRDP for renewable energy projects in community facilities are Rural Priorities and LEADER. Scottish Power Green Energy Trust (www.scottishpowergreentrust.co.uk) supports community projects that provide renewable energy which deliver wider social benefits up to £25,000. Various ethical loans funds may be appropriate to secure affordable loans for this type of social enterprise including Social Investment Scotland Loan Fund and Triodos Bank. Forestry Commission (www.forestry.gov.uk) has a commitment to promote wider community access and benefits from FC-owned estate and this includes support for renewable energy enterprises. There could be potential funding or in kind support from FC for the Trusts project. PROJECT EXAMPLES Fintry Development Trust Fintry Development Trust was set up in response to a large wind farm development planned for the area. Through negotiation, the community managed to come to an arrangement with the windfarm developers whereby the developers would pay the full initial cost of the Fintry Turbine and the village would pay this back over the first 15 years of operation. This meant that the village wouldn’t have to raise any money to pay for the turbine. During the first years (while the cost of the turbine is being paid off) the income from the turbine to the village will be between £50,000 and £100,000 per year. Once the turbine has been paid off, this will rise to nearer £400,000 to £500,000 per year (depending on electricity prices). Stronsay Development Trust The Trust is building a 900Kw community wind turbine on the island to allow the community to maximize the benefit from renewable technology by not-for-profit generation of a sizeable independent income stream through the sale of electricity to the local grid. The independent income stream from this project will create a fund which will allow the community to become more sustainable and independent and will generate financial, social and environmental benefits. Rousay, Egilsay and Wyre Development Trust The Trust is working towards the installation of a community-owned and managed wind turbine, which will generate electricity which can be sold to the National Grid to provide revenue to invest in further community projects. Isle of Gigha Heritage Trust The Trust operate a community owned wind project to provide a sustainable source of income for the island to secure the long term sustainability of the community. Since the turbines were installed in 2003, they have proven to be the mainstay of income generation for the Isle of Gigha Heritage Trust. The three turbines produce a total of 675 kW maximum capacity and this power is exported directly to the national grid. They fully paid for themselves of loans, grants and share issues since March 2009, and therefore any monies generated by the turbines can be passed straight on to the Trust. 102 9.0 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS In the previous chapter, the project profiles in the main focused on the large physical projects or the provision of services. In addition to these, however, a number of other smaller project suggestions emerged from the consultation and prioritisation processes which are certainly worthy of further highlighting. These projects should be taken forward by either existing community/voluntary groups or public sector agencies, any of which the Trust could help and support without taking on the long term responsibility. 9.1 VOLUNTEERING PROGRAMME FOR YOUNG PEOPLE Community Demand for Project Twenty-two participants at the community prioritisation event indicated they thought it would be beneficial to set up a volunteering programme for young people. This would involve young people earning rewards (such as trips to the cinema) if they volunteered a certain number of hours on tasks such as befriending or picking up litter. One participant also left an additional comment that ‘young people should be part of keeping the community in good condition in order for them to have pride in their area’. Potential Project The Trust could either link into an existing time bank project such as the one run by Argyll Voluntary Action or set up a local one specifically tailored to the needs of the area and the participating young people. This would involve coordinating tasks for young people to complete in the local area such as cutting grass or visiting elderly residents and recording the time volunteered by each young person. Rewards would then be arranged appropriate to the number of hours to encourage young people to volunteer to a certain level. Case Study An example of the type of project the Trust could set up is the Dream Scheme network which offers advice to groups wishing to set up a youth volunteer project (www.dreamscheme.org.uk). 9.2 APPRENTICESHIPS IN LOCAL BUSINESSES Community Demand for Project Support services for young people was voted as the second health and welfare priority overall by respondents from Cove and Kilcreggan, while those from Ardpeaton and Peaton rated it as their top priority. Support service for young people was selected as the top priority by 30% of all respondents and a top three priority by almost 60% of respondents from all areas. In addition, five respondents commented specifically on the need to support young people to find employment in tandem with raising wider job opportunities within the Peninsula area. 82% of the young people surveyed selected careers/job advice as either ‘extremely important’ or ‘important’. 24% of participants who completed the relevant question at the community prioritisation event selected ‘the provision of job opportunities for young people’ as the type of support that should be provided to young people in the Peninsula West area. 38% of participants considered that the Trust should encourage apprenticeships for young people with local businesses while 31% felt the Trust should incorporate employment opportunities into community projects. Potential Project 103 The Trust could work alongside local businesses to encourage them to offer apprenticeships to local young people. This could involve the Trust promoting schemes which support businesses to employ young unemployed people and assisting local businesses to access funding and support to progress such schemes. 9.3 CINEMA/FILM NIGHTS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE Community Demand for Project Over 50% of young people that completed the young people’s survey indicated that they thought a cinema was extremely important for the area. In addition, just under half of the young people selected ‘cinema’ as one of their top three priorities for the area receiving more priority selections than any other option. Two respondents to the community consultation specifically suggested a cinema for the Peninsula West area. Potential Project The Cove and Kilcreggan Film Society currently run film nights in the Cove Burgh Hall and similar events could be aimed directly at young people with appropriate films, purchasing licences to show the latest films on the large screen at the Cove Burgh Hall. Regional Screen Scotland (www.cinemaconsultant.co.uk) provides information and support to community groups looking to develop cinema facilities in rural areas. Alternatively, the Trust could also arrange trips to a local cinema for young people in the evenings when they are unable to travel by themselves. 9.4 GARDENING CLUB Community Demand for Project A gardening club was the fifth most frequently suggested community group in the community survey. Gardening services for the elderly was selected by 40 respondents to the community survey as their top priority health and welfare issue for the Peninsula West area. 18% of the total suggestions for additional community groups in the Peninsula West area were for a gardening club (23 participants). There does not appear to be a gardening club in the Peninsula West area at present. A gardening club could also tie in with improving the appearance of the local area and providing support to the elderly, which were also raised as concerns in the consultation. Further project suggestions by participants included ‘community register to match people who want to grow vegetables but don’t have land with people who have land but can’t or don’t have time to grow fruit and vegetables’ and ‘community garden plots’. 14 participants also selected allotments as a desired improvement to the Peninsula West area. Potential Projects The Trust could develop a gardening club through contacting individuals who expressed an interest during the consultation process or advertising for people interested in setting up a group. The Trust could then work with this group to access funding for projects such as assisting elderly residents with gardening and providing horticultural services to communal areas in the village. 9.5 LITTER PICK-UPS Community Demand for Project Improvement of the foreshore and elimination of knotweed was selected as the top priority overall by respondents to the community survey. Almost a third of all respondents selected improvement of the foreshore and elimination of knotweed as their top environment project and 73% selected this option as one of their top three priorities. Fifteen respondents commented on the need to improve the 104 foreshore by preventing the dumping of waste and three respondents suggested the set-up of a beachcombers group. 30% of participants at the community prioritisation event selected ‘litter bins/litter picking’ as the environment issue that the Trust should focus on. Four participants indicated a willingness to volunteer for occasional beach clean-ups. Potential Project The Trust could organise regular community clean-ups of the foreshore area. This could be led by a beachcombers group if interest in this was maintained. The clean-up could take place over a day and involve dividing the foreshore and allocating sections to groups of volunteers. An element of competition could be introduced to encourage people to participate and to maximise the area covered. At the end of the day a community event such as a BBQ could be held to reward all those who had taken part and further encourage community interaction. 9.6 HERITAGE/ARCHITECTURE TRAIL Community Demand for Project A heritage/architecture trail was selected as a top three employment priority by 40% of respondents to the survey. In addition, tourist facilities/attractions was selected as a top three business priority by 61% of respondents. Nine respondents suggested that the Peninsula West area would be good for tourism while four respondents also commented that there was an ideal opportunity to utilise the history and heritage to improve tourism business opportunities in the area. Another respondent commented that the current peninsula paths in the area do a good job as a heritage/architecture trail. 22% of participants at the community prioritisation event selected information points as the preferred tourist attraction for the area. One participant also commented that an audio tour of the Peninsula, linked with information points, would be a good initiative to attract tourism. 24% of participants suggested the views in the Peninsula West area should be promoted to tourists using information points to highlight the sights from certain key areas. Potential Project The Trust could develop a heritage/architecture trail in the area and provide promotional material to attract tourists to the area. This would involve consulting with local people to ascertain the areas and buildings to be included on the trail, gathering historical information for inclusion on interpretive boards throughout the trail and producing leaflets or audio recordings to guide visitors along the trail. The Trust would need to gain permission from land and property owners to include their site in the trail and to allow a trail to travel through land as this may increase the footfall through the land, causing additional damage. 9.7 COMMUNITY NOTICE BOARD AND LOCKABLE STORAGE FOR COMMUNITY GROUPS Community Demand for Project 24% of the community groups that responded to the survey selected a community notice board as the facility that would most benefit their group. This was the top facility for community groups. 20% of community groups that responded to the survey selected ‘lockable storage’ as a facility that their group would most benefit from. This was the second most often selected facility. In addition, a number of potential community groups suggested by respondents to the household survey already exist in the Peninsula West area. This suggests that, for some groups and residents at least, there is a lack of effective communication of the opportunities and groups available. 105 Potential Project The Trust could access funding from Awards for All or Scottish Community Foundation to invest in a community notice board and lockable storage. These would benefit local community groups by allowing greater advertising opportunities for them and providing additional facilities which will allow groups to purchase equipment to diversify their activities. A community notice board could be placed in a prominent location within either Kilcreggan or Cove village and provide advertising space to local community groups free of charge or for a small fee to cover costs. Lockable storage could be provided within an area of the Cove Burgh Hall as the most often used facility by local community groups. 9.8 SUPPORT SERVICES FOR LOCAL COMMUNITY GROUPS AND LOCAL BUSINESSES Community Demand for Project ‘Identifying potential funding sources’ was selected as the top support service for community groups by 48% of the community groups that responded to the survey. Due to the apparent lack of knowledge of community groups in the area by many residents, support provided by the Trust could also involve advertising existing groups to ensure that residents were aware of what was available and how to access it. Businesses desired information on where and how to access funding to develop the business further and advice on the best means to ensure the sustainability of the business. ‘Information on potential grant funding sources for development initiatives’ was selected as the top priority most often (by 45% of respondents with 64% selected it as a top three priority). This was followed by ‘sustainability advice e.g. energy conservation, recycling, etc.’ which was selected as a top three priority by 64% of respondent businesses. ‘Access to shared small business services’ and ‘new local business networks e.g. a co-operative or purchasing partnership’ were both selected as a top three business support service by 45% of respondents. One business respondent also suggested the provision of ‘a printed business directory of local businesses available at outlets free or low cost – also put an online version in an extended business section of rosneathpeninsula.org’. Potential Project The Trust could link with Argyll Voluntary Action and/or Business Gateway to arrange for support from these organisations to be provided in the Peninsula West area. 9.9 PARKING IN VILLAGE Community Demand for Project Village centre parking was selected as the top priority transport issue for 27% of respondents to the business survey and as a top three transport priority for 64% of respondent businesses. Village parking was also selected as a top three transport priority by 106 respondents to the household survey and two respondents commented on the need for additional off-road parking in the villages, particularly at the ferry terminal. Potential Project The Trust could look to develop the land surrounding the pier as additional parking for people using the ferry or the local shops in Kilcreggan. 10.0 COMMUNITY CAMPUS SUMMARY 106 Four potential ‘campuses’ are outlined in this section. These are intended to provide an example of how the different projects outlined in this Community Action Plan could come together to revitalise the Peninsula West area. The four areas include: Community campus - located at the old tennis courts on Church Road and encompassing outdoor sports facilities including tennis courts and an all-weather 5-a-side pitch, a children’s play area and an indoor centre to be used as a sports centre with a dedicated youth space for the area. This would ensure recreational provision for all residents in the area and, through the provision of multiple facilities in the one location, encourage increased interaction between different age and interest groups on the Peninsula. Tourism campus - located at the site of the current Kilcreggan Pier, including a play area, bandstand, community sculptures, and information points. This would help boost the local economy by providing additional facilities and activities to attract tourists to the area. Business campus - located at the end of Fort Road, a business campus could include small offices, communal function/meeting rooms or ‘hot desk’ facilities, providing much needed physical space to local entrepreneurs. This would encourage businesses from wider areas to create their base on the peninsula and provide facilities to enable new business start-ups, increasing local employment opportunities and boosting the economy of the local area. Foreshore campus - develop the entire foreshore area including the removal of knotweed, litter bins, benches, viewing points and community sculptures and artwork. This would benefit both local residents and visitors to the area by providing additional recreation facilities and improving the appearance of the local area. By locating similar projects together, the Trust could distinguish certain areas in the Peninsula West for specific purposes, ensuring the potential of each area is maximised. 10.1 COMMUNITY CAMPUS The Trust could work towards creating a community campus which would contain a range of facilities for use by the community for recreational purposes. The aim would be to create an area which is inclusive of a wide range of interest and age groups in the Peninsula West area. This could therefore include outdoor sports facilities including tennis courts and an all-weather 5-a-side pitch; a children’s play area; and an indoor centre to be used as a sports centre with a dedicated youth space for the area. The ideal site for the location of a community campus would be the area currently occupied by the old tennis courts/pavilion with either complete or partial redevelopment to reinvent this area as the Cove and Kilcreggan Community Campus for all in the area to enjoy. As the Cove and Kilcreggan Bowling Club is adjacent to the site, this also provides a facility for older residents to enjoy alongside children, young people and residents utilising the outdoor sports facilities. The community campus could be used by a range of local residents with the children’s play area used during the day by parents with young children and also potentially by a nursery service if this was to be provided in the nearby Rainbow Centre. The youth centre would be utilised primarily in the evenings, at the weekends or during school holidays with the youth centre also using the outdoor sports facilities on the site. The outdoor sports facilities could also be provided for hire to local residents to encourage healthy lifestyles and greater social interaction among many people who commute to work away from the Peninsula. The youth centre would include, or have a separate entrance. 107 By creating an area that provides facilities for residents on the peninsula from childhood to old age the Trust would also be able to foster intergenerational relations in the area and stimulate increased pride in the local area, focused upon this redeveloped area in which all have a stake. This could also potentially reduce incidences of vandalism and graffiti of facilities (as reported in previous children’s play parks in the area) as young people would also be part of this shared campus and thus be less likely to damage any part of it. To accompany the community campus and ensure all aspects of the needs, demands and aspirations of the local community are catered for the Trust could consider developing other areas of the Peninsula West to create tourism and business campuses. 10.2 TOURISM CAMPUS The Trust could develop further facilities and activities for visitors to the area taking advantage of an asset of the area, the foreshore, to successfully market the Peninsula West area to tourists. The tourism campus could encompass a play area, a bandstand for musical performances, community sculptures/artworks and information points. The space surrounding the pier in Kilcreggan could be used to create a tourism campus in the heart of the village. If located here the tourism campus could also encompass an upgraded marine access facility which would allow easier access to the peninsula for visitors and create a tourist hub. The location of the tourism campus at the pier in Kilcreggan would allow easy access to these facilities for day visitors on the ferry, tourists staying within the Peninsula West villages and tourists staying in the nearby caravan park at Rosneath. These facilities would be used mainly by tourists during the summer tourism season but could also be enjoyed by the local community throughout the year. By combining a range of facilities the tourism campus would provide activities for a range of age groups and types of visitors. This could include a play area for families with young children, musical performances to suit all ages and tastes, community sculptures for those interested in locally produced artwork, and information points for those interested in the history and scenery of the area. The tourism campus would provide a specific tourist attraction in the area which can be used to promote the area to potential visitors. By attracting tourists to the foreshore area, a tourism campus could boost local businesses and employment through increased tourist spending in the local village. 10.3 BUSINESS CAMPUS In order to accommodate the demand for small business units in the Peninsula West area and to encourage new business start-ups and employment opportunities, the Trust could develop a business campus in the Peninsula West area. The business campus could include small offices, communal function/meeting rooms or ‘hot desk’ facilities which could be hired by local people who require a small space to work at on an irregular basis, providing much needed physical space to local entrepreneurs. This could be located at the end of Fort Road, a location which is close to key amenities in Kilcreggan but isolated from the main village centre and residential areas. In particular, the site would be located close to the ferry link to Gourock for ease of business travel to wider areas and the proposed petrol station which may attract businesses require the use of cars or vans throughout the area. The site is also not far from the main road to Garelochhead, within walking distance of Kilcreggan village centre and could provide good views across the Clyde estuary to Gourock, providing an attractive setting for businesses. 108 The facilities at the business campus could be used on a regular basis by businesses hiring a unit as a permanent office, either new or developing local businesses or businesses from outwith the area seeking a low cost rural base for their operations. The facilities could also be hired by local entrepreneurs requiring occasional use of a meeting/conference room or desk space and high quality office equipment. The Trust could also use the business campus as a base for their activities and could provide/arrange for business support services such as training or an advice service to be provided from the campus. The development of one campus containing a range of business units would allow local businesspeople to network and allow easy advertising of the facility to businesses in wider areas. This would generate direct income for the area through hire of units while the presence of additional businesses would also provide local employment opportunities and boost the local economy. 10.4 FORESHORE AREA The Trust could develop the foreshore to increase the attractiveness of the area to tourists and its functionality for local residents. In developing this area, the Trust could implement a number of projects: The removal of knotweed which currently prevents access to the beach would open up the foreshore to increased potential uses for walkers or events Provision of litter bins and organising clean-ups to improve the appearance of the area to ensure it is suitable for use by local residents and visitors to the area Benches and viewing points provided by the Trust to allow both residents and tourists to take advantage of the views across Loch Long Community sculptures/artwork located along the foreshore. This would increase the attractiveness of the area, create continuity between the villages in the Peninsula West area and promote community pride by displaying the work of local people. This could also be developed with young people to increase their sense of ownership of the local area and help prevent incidences of vandalism and antisocial behaviour. The foreshore is a key asset of the Peninsula West area which the Trust should utilise to try and encourage tourism to the area. Increased tourism would benefit the community by developing the economy and generating local business and employment opportunities. In addition, development of the foreshore would directly benefit local residents by increasing the attractiveness of the local area and providing an additional facility for community recreation. 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11.1 ROSNEATH PENINSULA WEST COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN The declining population on the Peninsula, particularly among children and working age individuals, suggests development is needed to ensure the area remains an attractive place for individuals and families to live and work. This involves creating opportunities for local employment and providing community services and facilities within an attractive and accessible local area. The increasing proportion of the Peninsula West area’s population of pensionable age or above raises concerns over the provision of services and facilities to address any support needs they may develop while ensuring they can remain on the Peninsula. It is therefore vital that projects to support the elderly, such as sheltered housing and befriending services, are implemented to ensure that these community members are also included in the development of the Peninsula West area. Projects such as the Community Campus and volunteering scheme for young people are also important to develop intergenerational ties within the community, helping to strengthen the community as a whole and ensure all feel included. 109 The sustainability of the local area is also threatened as younger people who could contribute to the area’s economic and social life leave the area. A key issue resulting in young people and those with young families leaving the area is a lack of affordable housing. House prices within the Peninsula West area have been rising much quicker than average in the last decade. The development of affordable housing would contribute to combating this and provide the means for young couples or those with a young family to remain in or move to the Peninsula West area. Projects to improve local community facilities and services, the local economy and the appearance of the local area will contribute to improved quality of life in the Peninsula West area, thus making it more attractive to potential new residents, particularly families with young children. 11.2 CREATING QUALITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES In order to create high quality community facilities to attract people to settle in the Peninsula West area, the Trust could work towards creating a community campus containing recreational facilities. These facilities could be used by a range of interest and age groups on the Peninsula, contributing to increasing intergenerational relations and community interaction. The community campus could encompass outdoor sports facilities including tennis courts and an all-weather 5-a-side pitch, a children’s play area and an indoor centre to be used as a sports centre with a dedicated youth space. This would contribute to tackling some of the identified needs and demands in the area as well as providing an area of focus for all community activities. To complement the facilities on offer at the Cove and Kilcreggan community campus and to ensure that the demands for recreational facilities evidenced in the community consultation are met, the Trust could also consider developing further facilities around the Peninsula West area. A gym and indoor sports facility could be developed in partnership with the Sailing Club to create an inclusive water and indoor sports centre. The Trust could also look to develop the Rainbow Centre located close to the community campus. This would allow some sharing of activities and facilities between the Rainbow Centre, Cove Burgh Hall and the new community facility, which are all located within a quarter of a mile of each other. In particular, to complement the facilities currently in the area and those already proposed, the Rainbow Centre could be redeveloped as either a venue for a community-run nursery service or an arts centre to display the work of local artists. By developing local community facilities, the Trust will contribute towards making the area more attractive to potential residents and help counteract the declining population in the Peninsula West area. Additional facilities will also enhance the area for existing residents, ensuring the aspirations of local residents for their area are met and facilities are provided to accommodate the high community participation in this area. 11.3 BOOSTING THE LOCAL ECONOMY Along with developing community facilities to attract more people, particularly families with young children, to settle on the Peninsula, the Trust should consider ways to increase employment and business opportunities in the area and provide services to assist small businesses and parents in employment. In particular, the development of a nursery and after school club in the Peninsula West area would support the numerous working families with dependent children. This would also provide employment for a number of childcare providers and could be utilised to provide apprenticeships for young people looking to work in care. The Trust could also look to develop a dedicated business campus in the area, 110 with small units to encourage and support new and developing businesses. These facilities would allow local entrepreneurs to develop businesses providing local employment opportunities and boosting the economy in the area. This would also allow ease of support provision to local businesses within this campus and allow networking between local entrepreneurs to boost their business. The development of tourism in the Peninsula West area would also increase revenue for existing businesses and generate new business opportunities in the area. This could take the form of increasing the overall attractiveness and advertising of the area to tourists or creating events which would generate a great deal of tourism for a short period. These events could contribute to the economy of the local area by increasing foot fall to the villages and spending at local businesses during events and also by promoting the work of local residents, for example musicians or artists, the benefits of which could expand beyond the festival itself. Alongside this, the Trust could aim to improve the overall appearance of the local area and the marketing of the area to tourists. This could include developing more facilities for tourists and drawing attention to some of the features of the Peninsula West area, i.e. through provision of information points, a shore walkway, viewing points across Loch Long to the Cowal Peninsula and a shore front children’s play area for tourists. This could be developed as one overall tourism campus which could be marketed to potential visitors and would help boost the local economy through tourism spending in the area. 11.4 APPEARANCE AND ACCESSIBILITY OF THE LOCAL AREA Any work to improve the appearance of the area by tackling knotweed infestation, installing artwork and increasing the accessibility of the area through improvements to public transport and a local petrol station would help boost the local economy. These improvements would make the area more attractive to do business in and to tourists who would then spend money locally, thus increasing local employment opportunities. In addition, projects which improve the overall appearance of the local area also increase the attractiveness of the area to people who may settle in the area, thus boosting population. Projects to improve the appearance of the local area include the redevelopment of dilapidated buildings and facilities (such as play areas or the pier) and improvements to the foreshore area including the elimination or reduction of knotweed, the introduction of a walkway along the front and the provision of sculptures, benches and litter bins in the villages. In addition, the development of community woodland would provide a community run nature area for residents and visitors to enjoy, which could also be used educationally for local young people. The accessibility of the local area can be improved by projects aimed at increasing the provision of public transport, both the ferry and the bus, to the area. Without access to private transport, the Peninsula is relatively isolated in the evenings and inaccessible past ten o’clock at night. This prevents many residents from utilising activities and facilities in the nearby towns, highlighting both the need for additional facilities/activities within the area and the need to encourage increased provision of public transport where possible. A large proportion of the working population travel to their place of employment by car or van, therefore improvements to public transport would encourage more sustainable means of travel. Where this is still not suitable and residents require use of private transport, the provision of cheap and accessible fuel on the Peninsula would prevent unnecessary journeys to Helensburgh for fuel, contributing to the protection of the environment. The availability of fuel on the Peninsula would also make the area more attractive to potential residents and to businesses looking for a rural base containing key facilities. 111 11.5 RECOMMENDATIONS 1. On the basis of the information contained in this Community Action Plan, the Trust should determine the priority they wish to afford each project for development in the area. 2. The Project Profiles outline potential projects and give details of funders and contacts to other groups who could help support the development of the project. The Trust should utilise these to gather as much information as possible on the potential barriers and risks of each project from Trusts who have developed similar projects. The Trust should also look in more detail at the requirements of key funders to further ascertain the feasibility and suitability of each project for the Peninsula West area. 3. The Trust should determine a timeline for conducting each project on the basis of its priority to the Trust and local community and the level of preliminary work to be completed to prepare for the project. 4. The Trust should consider developing a sub-committee structure to allow small groups of Trust members to take responsibility for the development of projects, with each sub-committee then reporting back to the whole group at regular meetings. This would enable the Trust to pursue numerous projects at once without overburdening committee members and ensure that individual expertise and interest in particular projects is capitalised on. 5. The Trust should work with the many already existing community groups when implementing projects. There is a high community group participation rate in the area and the Trust should build on this to help implement projects and increase social interaction between different groups of individuals, particularly age groups, in the area. 12.0 APPENDIX 12.1 COMMUNITY GROUPS SURVEY List of community groups surveyed: Amenity Society Guides Angling Club Karate Club Art Group Kayak Club Badminton Club Library Beavers Lifelong Learning Beekeepers Line Dancing Book Group Literary Society Bowling Club Lunch Club Bridge Club Meals On Wheels Peninsula Paths Country Dancing Rainbows Cove & Kilcreggan Trust RNLI Cove Burgh Hall Scottish Country Dancing Cove Park Scouts Cove Sailing Club Spinning Workshop Craigrownie Church SSPCA Cubs Stay & Play Toddler Group Ethos Project SWRI Fairtrade Association 112 Brownies Old Peoples Welfare Assoc Choir Panters Football Club Church Guild Parent Teacher Assoc Coastguard Peaton Nature Reserve Community Farm Peninsula Magazine Computer Club Table Tennis Film Society Web Group Fire Station Yoga Freemasons Youth Centre Friends Of Burgh Hall Zumba Friends Of Kilcreggan P S Friends Of Linn Garden 122 BUSINESS SURVEY List of businesses surveyed: Cove Village Store Newman School of Motoring David Alan Payne (Painting services) North Ailey Farm E Auld - Farmer P Wilson Electrical Ltd Ensign Motifs Gordon Sutherland - Painter and decorator Ferndene Builders I. Ballantine - Farmer James Auld Funeral Directors Plug It Kilcreggan Electrical Services The Lighthouse Kilcreggan Hotel Thomas Ferguson & Son Building Contractors Kilcreggan Medical Centre Ian McLean, Video Producer Kilcreggan Post Office Propped Up Furniture Removers Pure Green Space Ltd G.B. Sutherland, Plumber & heating engineer Quick Stitch: alterations and repairs Ferndene Builders RS Entertainments Liam MacKenzie, Tree Surgeon Scratch-2-Shine Green Gardens W. Paterson - Farmer Hair Dressing and Make-Up Artistry A. Mylne and Co. - Marine Craft Surveyors Herron Pottery Kilcreggan Body Shop J & L Builders Terrace on the Waterfront K Spittal Plumbing and Heating The Barbers Shop K Walkers Family Butchers The Creggan Inn 113 Community Action Plan prepared for Rosneath Peninsula West Community Development Trust by Community Links Scotland Community Links Scotland 63 Kilbowie Road, Clydebank, West Dunbartonshire, G81 1BL tel: 0141 952 4382 email: info@comlinks.org.uk www.comlinks.org.uk 114