Green Benefits - Tennessee Parks and Greenways Foundation

advertisement
Socio-economic Benefits of Green Space
Tennessee Parks and Greenways Foundation
Dwight Barnett, 2012
DRAFT 3/28/13
Highlights: the following studies show that trees, vegetation, and green space may provide the following
benefits for humans
 Improved mood
 Reduced tension
 Reduced anger and aggression
 Reduced depression and anxiety
 Improved general health
 Lower blood pressure
 Lower pulse rate
 Increased HRV (heart rate variability)
 Lower cortisol levels
 Increased tolerance of pain
 Faster healing
 Fewer underweight babies
 Reduces obesity and possibly reduced diabetes
 Enhanced immunity and anti-cancer effects
 Increased longevity
 Reduced fatigue and increased vigor
 Enhanced benefits of aerobic exercise
 Improved focus
 Increased creativity
 Substantially fewer sick days taken
 Less bullying in schools
 Improved cognition
 Improved standardized test scores
 Ameliorates ADHD symptoms
 Better motor development
 Fewer disciplinary problems
 Increased self discipline
 Higher graduation rate
 Increased cooperation and higher morale
 Increased office worker productivity
 More job satisfaction
 Increased sense of safety
 Reduced crime rate
 More caring and generosity
 Increased and improved social interaction
 Higher satisfaction with communities
 More use of outdoors
 Higher property values (average of 20% for properties adjacent to green space)
 Increased value of property tax base.
 Higher shopper spending (10%)
 Customers perceive higher product quality
 Customers come from farther to shop, pay more for parking
 Green space attracts highly paid knowledge workers and industries
 People prefer spreading trees, small to mid-sized trees, a diversity of species, high tree density, and a
well-tended appearance
1
Methods
Only peer-reviewed research (mostly that published in scientific journals) is cited, with the following exceptions
1. A few studies prepared by consultants (Herschong) or government studies (Hamilton and Quaile, for
example)
2. Literature cited in the last section, on recruiting industry, is non-empirical
No secondary sources are cited. A few literature reviews are listed in the bibliography for further reading, but
are not cited.
Research in this area has increased greatly over the last 20 years, and analytical tools have become more
sophisticated.
We did not exclude inconclusive and negative results. Some such results are expected in science due to
experimental error. The great majority of studies show positive benefits from greenspace.
The research cited is associative, not causative. Some findings in this paper are strongly supported (many
studies), and others are more weakly supported (only a few studies). One isolated study alone is insufficient to
draw firm conclusions from. But consistent positive results from lone but related studies carries strong
implications.
The search was conducted using Google Scholar. Google Scholar has certain limitations. Full texts are available
for only a few studies (in cumbersome pdf format), and the abstracts posted sometimes lack meaningful detail,
particularly if financially valuable economic information is disclosed in the study. Funds were not available for
purchase of full articles.
The range of subjects was broad, and the articles we found are far from exhaustive. Further search would
produce diminishing returns with, most likely, no major revelations. We found the bulk of the mainstream
literature, more than enough to define green benefits rather precisely.
It is very important not to cite the specific figures of one study as if it were a universal truth. Numbers generated
by scientific studies vary a lot, depending on many factors. To be valid, scientific findings must be replicable.
Again, one study by itself does not necessarily show much. We need to examine patterns. Experimental setup
and statistics can get very complicated. Please see Bowler et al (22) for a good example of this. Bowler and
colleagues performed a meta-analysis of data pooled from a number of studies. They found that the pooled data
produced conclusions with lower statistical significance than indicated by the statistical analyses of the individual
studies.
Health and Psychological Benefits of Green Space
UGS (Urban Green Space) offers opportunities for Nature Assisted Therapy that can help many medical
conditions, from schizophrenia to obesity. (5) The following studies exemplify the overall health benefits of
UGS:
 The annual prevalence rate of 15 of the 24 disease clusters was lower in and near a green setting. The
relation was strongest for anxiety disorder and depression, children, lower economic status, and in
slightly urban areas vs very strongly urban areas (173)
 Danes living more than 1 km away from the nearest green space report poorer health and health-related
quality of life, and 1.42 higher odds of experiencing stress than do respondents living less than 300 m
from a green space. (245)
 At work and in a junior high school, health and discomfort symptoms were found to be 21% to 25%
lower during the period when subjects had plants or plants and full-spectrum lighting present compared
to a period without plants (75)
2

Circadian variations in vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) and the morning rise in cortisol
were higher in office workers in old offices/cubicles than in offices with good views. (265)
Psychological benefits
Even the color green itself, aside from anything else, improves mood and affect, and enhances creativity (164)
Green/natural surroundings yield tremendous psychological benefits. One study showed that perceived
neighborhood greenness was more strongly associated with mental health than it was with physical health.
(247), and as we will see the physical health benefits of green environments are quite impressive.
Many studies show that green environments, both outdoors and indoors, reduce stress (60, 133, 180, 213).
Proximity to green space (within 3 km) helps residents deal with stressful life events; conversely, residents with
less green space fair more poorly (287, 288) Part of the stress management benefits may arise from the fact that
exposure to nature also significantly reduced fear arousal. (278).
Affective and restorative benefits of green urban environments: Green environments go beyond helping us
struggle through life, though – they actually make us feel good, including feelings of affection, friendliness,
playfulness, and elation (278) Negative feelings decrease, and positive feelings increase when in a forest or
park (34, 150, 152, 169) Forest environments are perceived as significantly more "comfortable", "soothing",
“refreshing” “invigorating” and "natural", “friendly” and “sacred” than urban environments. People feel lower
levels of negative feelings such as “sadness”, "tension-anxiety", "depression-dejection", "anger”, “hostility"
“aggression”, "fatigue", and "confusion" significantly decreased, (1, 10, 27, 204, 272, 278, 279, 285), as did anger
(99) and driver frustration (28) Vigor increased in green environments vs. urban areas. (1, 10, 204, 277)
These studies demonstrate that green environments are more than pleasantries: they actually help correct the
innate detrimental health effects of city living (or “discords’). Greenery and green space help us adapt to the
environment we have created.
 Walking in a nature preserve improves mood and reduces anger, while a walk in the city worsened
mood and increased anger (99).
 Similarly, a walk in woods and looking at pictures of forests increased directed attention ability and
alleviated mental fatigue (15, 37, 73, 99), while walking in the city lowered it. (99)
 Less green space in people's living environment coincided with feelings of loneliness and with perceived
shortage of social support. Loneliness and perceived shortage of social support partly mediated the
relation between greenspace and health. (177)
This “discord” effect has also been noted in terms of physiological health (89)
We want to get better from exercise, not worse! Green exercise, done in “green” settings such as parks,
greenways, or even a tree-lined streets, appears to address this problem. “Green” exercise is more
healing of such things as hostility, depression, and stress more than is exercising elsewhere. (191) A number
of studies bear on this:
 Exercise in a green environment improved mood and self esteem, tranquility, and reduced anger,
anxiety, and depression more than exercise alone. Greatest results were in the mentally ill. (8, 9, 19, 96,
99)
 Higher degrees of perceived environmental greenness were associated with larger reductions in anxiety
after green exercise (178).
 There is a correlation between regular use of natural environments and a lower risk of poor mental
health, but not for activity in other types of environment. (186)
 There was a clear effect of both exercise and different scenes on blood pressure, self-esteem and mood.
Green exercise reduced blood pressure and increased self-esteem more than the exercise-only. By
contrast, both rural and urban unpleasant scenes reduced the positive effects of exercise on self-esteem.
(219)
3






Green exercise led to a significant improvement in self-esteem and (reduced) total mood disturbance
(with anger-hostility, confusion-bewilderment, depression-dejection and tension-anxiety all improving
post-activity). (218)
Viewing nature, being in the presence of nearby unusual nature, and participating in nature-centered
activities improved mental health. Exercising in the presence of nature (green exercise) thus has
important public and environmental health consequences. (217)
Being outdoors was associated with greater vitality, a relation that was mediated by the presence of
natural elements. (227)
Natural surroundings engendered less spatially selective attention in the nature group compared to the
urban group. (148)
Women in their third trimester could concentrate better and made fewer errors. (244)
Green environments appear to increase caring and generosity (292)
Experiencing nature has a more powerful influence on the rehabilitation potential of people greatly affected by a
crisis; just taking a walk had a lesser effect. Individuals who have many experiences of nature are less affected by
their crisis than are those who have few such experiences. (202)
That helps to explain why Wilderness experiences are often very deep, significant, and transcendental (119).
Wilderness use reduced stress and was highly restorative, and improved mood, cognition, and physical
performance. Spending more than one day deepened the benefits (38, 98). Larger green spaces may be more
important for health effects than smaller spaces (133, 189, 300)
On the other end of the spectrum, greenery indoors has been shown to be highly beneficial in terms of
emotion.
 An unobstructed bedroom view from a hospital to natural surroundings appears to have better
supported improvement in self-reported physical and mental health (130, 283)
 Tolerance of discomfort and pain (from cold and from flexible bronchioscpoy) was greater in the
presence of plants (58, 168; 208, 283).
 Plants in a room improved tolerance and perceptions more than did interesting and colorful decoration
(168)
 A combination of natural views and sounds were more effective in reducing pain than either separately.
(130)
Although we should not take one data set as definitive, an Australian research team investigating the affective
effects of indoor environments found the following in offices with green plants:
 a 6% reduction in stress,
 a 30% reduction in confusion,
 a 37% reduction in tension/anxiety,
 a 4.5% increase in vigor,
 a 38% reduction in fatigue,
 a 58% reduction in depression/dejection
 a 44% reduction in anger/hostility. (27)
Other investigators found that horticultural therapy improves mood state and decreases stress, (298) Spending a
short time in a city park and urban forest reduced stress by 87%, headaches by 52%,, and reduced balance
problems 40% (96).
Who stands to benefit the most from greenspace?
 People with considerable stress and anxiety (279)
 Those with attentional fatigue. (243)
Exhausted people chose woodlands two to one over city visits as being likely to ease fatigue (101) But ironically,
it is the less stressed people who tend to use green space for restoration. (133, 245) However, another study
found that people with health complaints were more likely to seek natural favorite places of restoration, and
4
they benefited more from each visit than people with fewer problems (134). In times of heat stress, longer and
more frequent visits of green spaces generate significant improvements of the perceived emotional benefits and
well-being. (146)
Physiological benefits
Patients with a window view of nature healed more rapidly, required less pain medication, and had shorter stays
than patients with views of brick walls (282, 283) Patients in hospital rooms with plants and flowers had
significantly shorter hospitalizations, fewer intakes of analgesics, lower ratings of pain, anxiety, and fatigue, and
more positive feelings and higher satisfaction about their rooms. (210) Plants brightened up the room
environment in a surgery ward, reduced stress, and also conveyed positive messages of the hospital caring for
patients. (210) An unobstructed bedroom view to natural surroundings appears to have better supported
improvement in self-reported physical and mental health during a residential rehabilitation program (222).
Plants in hospital rooms increase satisfaction with rooms and some patients’ well being, but addition of plants
did not increase the degree of improvement. A beautiful surrounding environment may have influenced the
results (221)
Patients exposed to a natural green environment showed less autonomic activity indicative of stress (e.g.
elevated blood pressure and electrodermal activity), as well as show altered somatic activity indicative of greater
positive affect (e.g. depressed electromyographic (EMG) activity over the brow region and increased activity over
the cheek region). Exposure to vegetation images increased Alpha brain activity. Nature, especially water, had a
positive influences on emotional states. Water, and to a lesser extent vegetation views, held attention and
interest more effectively than the urban scenes. (280) Green environments vs urban increase parasympathetic
nerve activity, lower sympathetic nerve activity (150, 152, 205, 206, 207), slow autonomic brain activity and
engendered less spatially selective attention (148)
Lowering of blood pressure and heart rate have both been shown to be positively correlated with increased
health and well-being, (259) Walking in a natural area or viewing green scenes lowered systolic and diastolic
blood pressure (99, 205, 207, 212, 219, 273, 258, 273), and pulse rate (50, 205, 207, 219, 258, 273) and
significant decreased levels of the stress hormone cortisol (150, 152, 206, 207, 208, 251, 265, 273, 314)
Viewing green scenes increases heart rate variability The power of the HF component of the HRV tended to be
higher and LF/(LF+HF) tended to be lower. (HRV tends to be low under stress and in PTS) (88, 207, 273)
Circadian rhythm fluctuations in salivary amylase activity were much smaller than stressor-induced variations
(315).
Habitual walking in forest environments may lower blood pressure by reducing sympathetic nerve activity and
have beneficial effects on blood adiponectin and DHEA-S levels, and habitual walking exercise may have
beneficial effects on blood NT-proBNP level (160)
One study found that walking in a forest once per month reduced blood pressure as much a walk every week.
(192) Another, however, found that forest bathing therapy program did not induce prolonged systolic blood
pressure (SBP) reduction (251). However, considering the significant decrease in cortisol level and
improvement in QoL measures, this may be a useful model of community hypertension management program
(251, 314)
Exposure to vegetation images increased Alpha brain activity. Nature, especially water, had a positive influences
on emotional states. Water, and to a lesser extent vegetation views, held attention and interest more effectively
than the urban scenes. (280)
Studies in Japan show that being in a forest may increase immunity and fight cancer. “Forest bathing” (shinrin
yoku) trips resulted in an increase in NK (Natural Killer white blood cells) activity (156, 157, 158,159, 161),
which was mediated by increases in the number of NK cells and the levels of intracellular granulysin, perforin,
granzymes A/B (155, 156, 157), levels of intercellular anticancer proteins (159, 161) Effect lasted at least 7 days
5
after the trip. (158) Phytoncides released from trees, together with decreased stress hormones, may partially
contribute to the increased NK activity. (157) These effects lasted for a month. (156) Volatile chemicals
(alpha-pinene, beta myrcene, limonene, gama muururolene) released by trees was relaxing and reduced stress ,
and resulted in a 40% decrease in tumor growth (69, 33) Phytoncides significantly enhance human NK activity
and this effect is at least partially mediated by induction of intracellular perforin, granzyme A, and granulysin
(162.) These findings suggest that visiting forest parks may have a preventive effect on cancer generation and
progression. (162) Increased forest coverage may partially contribute to a decrease in mortality due to cancers
in Japan. (163)
Other health related benefits include:
 Fewer premature babies. A 10% increase in tree-canopy cover within 50 m of a house reduced the
number of small for gestational age births by 1.42 per 1000 births (64)
 Lowered obesity(only) in crowded “green” neighborhoods (13, 167) , and reduced blood glucose levels,
beyond calorie consumption. Presumably, the forest environment reduces blood glucose levels (200).
 Lower cortisol levels (205, 272) increased vitality. (1, 10, 204, 227)
 increased longevity of urban senior citizens. (253)
However, one investigator concluded that “While considerable evidence suggests that access to green space
yields health benefits, we found no such evidence at the scale of the American city. In the USA, greener cities tend
also to be more sprawling and have higher levels of car dependency. Any benefits that the green space might
offer seem easily eclipsed by these other conditions and the lifestyles that accompany them.” (224)
Health benefits are strongest in natural settings (mainly urban woodlands), less so for smaller, more managed
parks, and actually negative for urban park settings devoid of nature than in cities (133, 281, 316, 89), Health
has been found to improves with adjacency to greenspace, especially among women and the elderly, and to a
lesser extent among the less educated (52, 60)
NOTE: Viewing nature films on an immersive screen had a strong effect on pulse rate (51, 219) and skin
conductivity. The effects were greater on the immersive screen than on a normal screen. This implies that other
similar studies may underestimate the restoration effects of viewing nature. (51) Participants in the nature
condition were found to exhibit increased positive affect and decreased stress after immersion in VR when compared
to those in the control condition. (284)
Research (not included here) indicates that epigenetic tags governing onset of diabetes, bipolar, Parkinson’s, and
other disorders can be activated by stress. Presumably that includes urban stresses. If so, a stressful urban
environment could be negatively affecting our decedents’ DNA and health for a generation or more to come.
Conversely, more green space should reduce tag activation and the passing down of the activated disorders.
Social Benefits of Green Space
Natural elements are more than an "amenity". The most important factors in neighborhood satisfaction were the
availability of nearby trees, well-landscaped grounds, and places for taking walks. (120)
Crime and Violence
Green environments in inner city residential settings reduced aggression. violence, and valdalism as well as
mental fatigue (23, 139) The greener a building’s surroundings were, the fewer crimes (both property and
violent) reported. (136) A 10% increase in tree canopy was associated with a roughly 12% decrease in crime.
The relationship was greatest on public lands. Trees made crime worse in only a few locations where residential
areas met old industrial areas. (270)
Vacant lot greening was associated with consistent reductions in gun assaults (22) Smaller, view-obstructing
trees are associated with increased crime, whereas larger trees are associated with reduced crime. (66) Trees
along roads can increase drivers’ ability to handle frustration (28)
6
Safety
Residents of a housing project felt safer in a green environment, except in very highly urban areas (26, 141, 174)
In an urban housing complex, tree density and grass maintenance increased both preference and sense of safety.
(135) People think nature trails are safer than “safe” areas in cities. (107)
Health
Presence of nature and the greening of vacant lots reduced stress and promoted more exercise. (23, 91), reduced
procrastination, helped residents deal with difficulties, and reduced mental fatigue (138)
The addition of street trees improved mood and also cognitive awareness of improvement. (237)
Participants immersed in natural environments reported higher valuing of intrinsic aspirations (self-oriented
values) and lower valuing of extrinsic aspirations (others’ values oriented), whereas those immersed in nonnatural environments reported increased valuing of extrinsic aspirations and no change of intrinsic aspirations.
Nature fosters autonomy of thinking, and appears to increase generosity. (292)
Less greenspace in people's living environment coincided with feelings of loneliness and with a perceived
shortage of social support. (177)
Social Dynamics
UGS increased residents’ social capital, encouraged social interaction among residents, enhanced their mutual
trust, expanded social network, strengthened belongingness to neighborhood, (18) and increased neighborhood
social ties, and sense of adjustment (141)
Tree cover near public housing drew people outside, and more mixed groups of youth and adults (26, 39, 141,
156) increased social activity, and increased the proportion of social to nonsocial activities they support. (248)
Denser plantings attracted the most people (155) Use of greenspaces improved sense of community and social
ties among senior citizens (144)
Satisfaction of Residents
Views of trees from an apartment complex increased satisfaction and well-being, especially among lower
economic classes, children, and the elderly. (80, 121, 175, 232)
Increasing the amount of tree and shrub cover within a 1500 ft radius of single-family households significantly
moderates and mediates the negative relationship between the amount of nearby retail land use and
neighborhood satisfaction. (70)
Social Inequalities
There is less green space in socio-economically deprived areas (189) Neighborhoods with a high proportion of
blacks, low income, and renters experience an inequitable distribution of tree canopy, especially in public street
trees (110, 147) These inequities suggest that residents in deprived neighborhoods experience an inequity of all
the benefits of green space,
Research on environmental equality in black vs white areas is lacking (246)
7
Economics
Populations that are exposed to the greenest environments also have the lowest levels of health inequality
related to income deprivation. (187)
Conversion of the Brownfields into greenspaces would increase property values for 890 neighborhood
residences between 2 40 and 7.01 million, or about $5,000 per household. (125)
Additional neighborhood trees would slightly increase the value of over 97% of the properties analyzed. This
suggests that while Los Angeles residents may want additional trees, they are unwilling to pay for them. (230)
Non-economic values
The fact that people in green neighborhoods cycled and walked less, while spending more time on gardening,
points to other reasons than exercise for the health benefits of green space. (175) Beyond physical,
psychological and economic benefits, forests provide deep transcendent experiences for some visitors. (299)
Children and Education
Student satisfaction, concentration, and pay attention
Tropical plants in classrooms resulted in better student evaluations of courses and teachers (67)
Short (20 min) visits to a park reduced ADHD symptoms (260), and children with ADHD who play regularly in
green play settings have milder symptoms than children who play in built outdoor and indoor settings.(72, 73,
140, 262, 263) Walking in woods and looking at pictures of forests increased directed attention ability (15, 16)
Students in a class room with six potted plants in the back had significantly stronger feelings of preference,
comfort, and friendliness (95)
Childrens’ development, health and well being
Psychological well-being, meaningfulness and vitality were found to be robustly correlated with connectedness
to nature (CN). (29)
Green school grounds invite children to jump, climb, dig, lift, rake, build, role play and generally get moving in
ways that nurture all aspects of their health and development. (69)
A natural “green” playground improved children’s motor fitness, lead to more diverse, creative play. (69, 77)
At work and in a junior high school, health and discomfort symptoms were found to be 21% to 25% lower during
the period when subjects had plants or plants and full-spectrum lighting present compared to a period without
plants (75)
Students in a class room with six potted plants in the back had significantly stronger feelings of preference,
comfort, and friendliness, took fewer sick days, and misbehaved less (95)
A brief glimpse of green prior to a creativity task enhances creative performance. (164)
Children with potted plants in the back took fewer sick days, and misbehaved less (95)
8
In a rural setting, levels of nearby nature moderate the impact of stressful life events on the psychological wellbeing of children. Specifically, the impact of life stress was lower among children with high levels of nearby
nature than among those with little nearby nature. (293)
Play
Children spent only 13% of their time playing outdoors, but this time constituted a third of their activity. Play in
greenspace constituted only 2% of boys’ total time, but when boys are in greenspace, activity is more likely to be
of higher intensity (196)
“Good” schoolyards, as rated by teachers, had woods either in or near them, whereas the bad schoolyards did
not. It also was seen that children in the good schoolyards took-part in a greater number of activities than
children in the bad ones. (165)
Levels of play and access to adults were approximately half as much as those found in spaces with more trees
and grass, and the incidence of creative play was significantly lower in barren spaces than in relatively green
spaces. (261)
Student behavior and performance
Views with greater quantities of trees and shrubs from cafeteria as well as classroom windows are positively
associated with standardized test scores, graduation rates, percentages of students planning to attend a fouryear college, and fewer occurrences of criminal behavior. In addition, large expanses of landscape lacking natural
features are negatively related to these same test scores and college plans. These featureless landscapes included
large areas of campus lawns, athletic fields, and parking lots. All analyses accounted for student socio-economic
status and racial/ethnic makeup, building age, and size of school enrollment. (183)
Natural views from college dorm rooms were associated with better performance on attentional measures.
(264)
Exposure to natural environments during play greatly reduces or eliminates bullying in schools. (180)
The more natural a girl's view from home, the better herself-discipline. (259)
Children whose homes improved the most in terms of greenness following relocation also tended to have the
highest levels of cognitive functioning following the move. (294)
Teachers
Greenspace, especially at school, helps reduce stress and improve coping in teachers (17, 90)
Workers
In the workplace, noneconomic factors influence work satisfaction and profitability. People high in well-being
later earn higher incomes and perform better at work than people who report low well-being. Happy workers
are better organizational citizens, meaning that they help other people at work in various ways. (57)
Forest views from windows improved job satisfaction. (68, 239, 240, 315) and quality of life (68). A view of
natural elements reduced intention to quit . (282)
Views of natural settings from windows increases sense of well being. (122, 312)
9
Paintings of nature and views of nature reduced stress and anger (28, 143, 239, 240, 282, 312) Views of a
forest from windows reduced feelings of pressure. (239, 240)
Circadian variations in vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) and the morning rise in cortisol were higher
in office workers in old offices/cubicles than in offices with good views. (265}
Exposure to plants increased productivity, in one study by 6 to 12%, and workers had 10 to 25% better mental
function and recall (24, 231, 239 241, 242,), and greenery was correlated with effectiveness (105) On the other
hand, one study found that while exposure to views of greenery have been shown to have many beneficial effects,
they did not increase student or worker performance in this study (74)
Plants in offices reduced confusion 30%, tension/anxiety 37%,, , 38% reduction in fatigue, reduced depression
and rejection 58%, reduced anger/hostility 44%, and increased vigor 4.5% (27) Office plants and a view of
nature reduced tension and anxiety, (3),
Workers with a window view reported less sickness and fatigue. (110} Worker sickness and discomfort
symptoms were found to be 21% to 25% lower when they had plants present (24, 75)
High schools with greater quantities of trees and shrubs viewed from cafeteria as well as classroom windows
are positively associated with standardized test scores, graduation rates, percentages of students planning to
attend a four-year college, and fewer occurrences of criminal behavior (183)
Office plants help increase managers’ creativity (30) The color green in and of itself increases creativity (165)
Environments with greater perceived creativity: (a) complexity of visual detail, (b) view of natural environment,
(c) use of natural materials, (d) with fewer cool colors used, and (e) less use of manufactured or composite
surface materials. (184)
Property values
Yard and street trees, landscaping
Contingent price estimates (canvassed opinions of realtors) and hedonic valuation of amenities (based on actual
prices) varied considerably (301)
Several trees in yard increase home value and added $200,008/ year to property tax revenues in Athens GA in
1970’s (equals $1,000,000 today?) (2, 3)
Mature trees contributed about
 1.9% (63)
 3 to 5% (2, 3)
 6% to house values (189)
Homes with good landscaping sell for
 5% to 11% more (12)
 or 12.7% (97)
 5–12% (171) and
 4% to 5%. (102)
Street trees add $8870 to sales price and reduce Time on Market by 1.7 days (66)
10
For more expensive properties there was a slight increase in value for the addition of smaller street trees, but a
decrease associated with large trees. For less expensive properties there was no significant effect of tree
presence or size. (201).
Parks and urban/suburban woodlands
Proximity to green space increases sale value (20, 49, 82, 172, 275, 83, 252, 300) although one study showed no
significant effect on house prices (195)
Two empirical studies of data pooled from other empirical studies (meta-annalyses) put the estimate of property
value increase due to adjacent green space at 20% (223, 42, 43)
Homes facing parks were valued
 22% higher than those ½ mile away (185)
 33% higher at 40 feet, 9% at 1,000 feet, and 4.2% at 2,500 feet (99)
 5% and 20% higher if adjacent to small patches of forest in the urban interface, depending on score for
forest density and health characteristics (266)
 7.1% and 13.2% higher for views of green spaces and proximity to water bodies (114), and in another
study, 5 to 15% higher. (226)
 4.9% higher for a forest view (276)
A 1% increase in adjacent open space increased housing values by .6 and .7%, adding to tax revenue. (84) Each
percentage increase in tree cover added $783.98 to the property value. On average, trees added 10.7% to the
values of the homes in this study (61). The closer to a green urban area, the higher the house price (190)
A one kilometer increase in the distance to the nearest forested area leads to an average 5.9 percent decrease in
the market price of the dwelling. (276)
Proximity to permanent green space raised property values more than three times more than proximity to
developable land (84, 112). In another study, adjacency to green space of any kind raised property value on
single family homes, but the difference was less than reported elsewhere (111)
Property value increased with proximity to parks, so long as the crime index is above a critical threshold value,
The further the crime index value is from a that threshold value, the steeper the relationship is between park
proximity and home value. (269)
The value of UGS is highest in areas that are densely populated, near city center, high income, high crime, and
many children. Overall city averages underestimate UGS values in these settings (4, 53)
Number of trees, types of trees, appearance, size
House values increased with tree density (54, 128), and low tree density depressed prices (128) A 10% increase
in tree cover within 100 m increased average home sale price by $1371 (0.48%) and within 250 m increased sale
price by $836 (0.29%). In a model including both linear and squared tree cover terms, tree cover within 100 and
250 m increased sale price to 40–60% tree cover. (229) Property having at least 40 trees per acre yielded a land
value that is 22 to 27 percent higher than that of treeless property (56)
Attractiveness of parks matters a great deal. Houses within 300 to 500 feet of small and less attractive (barren,
weedy )“basic” parks sold for 15% more, and 6.5% more 500 to 1500 feet away, but close proximity reduced
values 14%. Houses close to (within 600 feet) of more attractive small parks sold for an 11% premium. Houses
close to (200 to 1500 feet) of attractive, medium sized parks sold for a premium of 6%, but values of closer
houses remained the same. Proximity to unattractive parks reduced property values by 50% (71)
Buyers appear to prefer large adjacent green spaces more than small ones (275)
11
A significant positive relationship between per caput expenditures and the sales price of property was found to
exist in one sample, but this relationship could not be inferred to exist in the population because of a finding of
no significant difference upon cross-validation to another sample. The acreage of park land per 1000 population
was not found to be significantly related to sales price. It was concluded that there was no evidence of a
relationship between parks and recreation services and property values. (236)
Greenways and Golf courses
Golf courses within 200 feet had a large impact on price (172.) Adjacency to golf course raised prices 16-19% in
one neighborhood, 12.2% over nearby houses and 20.2% over the city-wide average in another case (198), and
5.3 to 6.3% in another neighborhood (198), 7.6 percent (62) and little in yet another study(198)
Some but not all greenways have a positive, significant effect on property values (166) Proximity to a greenway
increased property values about 10% to 15% (93, 220.) Greenways provide many less quantifiable public
benefits. (220) Survey of mainly non-refereed studies implies that greenways have a mostly neutral impact on
property values (48)
Large wild tracts and Wilderness
Property values are higher in remote wild areas than around agricultural lands (11), and increase with proximity
to protected wilderness areas. (215, 290). Building lots that border the preserve sell at premia of about $5,800
to $8,400 (19% to 35% of lot price). The premia of finished houses on those lots was even higher, but less
precisely estimated. (267)
Water
Proximity to lakes produced the greatest impact on home sale value, followed by parks, trails, and streams.
Increasing view areal extents as well as increasing the amount of water and grassy land covers in views also
resulted in increased sale prices. Increased view richness in terms of the number of different land cover types in
a view reduced home sale prices. (29) A view of a lake added $256,544.72 (an 89.9% premium) to the value of
the home (21) Ocean view increased home prices 60%. (14) Housing prices in an area that restricts building
with water frontage increased by 46–62%. Housing prices nearby without frontage increased by 14–27% and
prices further away (non-restricted) 13–21%. (213) Water quality also affects real estate prices (153)
Economic and tax revenue
Tree cover increases property tax base values. (3)
A $14,000,000 purchase of park increased property values $183,000,000. (103)
The recreation benefits of a trail exceed costs. (166)
Based on an empirical study, it was estimated that a rail-trail would receive approximately 416 213 recreation
visits per year by area households and account for a total consumer surplus in excess of $7.5 million. (216)
Preferences
12
Nature is by far the favorite city environment (107) People perceive the natural environments as more beautiful
than the built environments. (286) Adult groups evidence a strong tendency to prefer nature, and liking for
urban scenes usually increases when trees and other vegetation are present. (279) Residents rated benefits of
trees higher than annoyances. (78, 241) Residents value trees, and place a high priority on street trees and
planting trees in their neighborhoods. (86)
Density. High tree densities are preferred (39, 54, 56, 229.) The most favorable density is 40 trees per acre
(57), and pleasure in visiting a park increased with increasing tree density (25.) Stands of hardwoods at 50%
density produced most stable brain activity and pulse, and greatest relaxation, a better effect than solid cover or
conifers (6.) Shoppers said they prefer a full canopy of large trees in shopping districts (303.)
Most people were satisfied with a density of one tree per house, but still 59% prefer more (118) Quantity and
especially quality of street trees, as opposed to green areas, had an effect on self-reported health. (288) Planting
large nursery stock as opposed to small increased estimated property value by 5%. There are significant
differences among species in benefits and annoyances. (241)
There was a strong preference for trees with the generic acacia shape or spreading canopies (100, 169, 242, 249,
250.)
Findings on size preferences were inconclusive:
 Small trees (78.)
 Trees more than 25 feet tall (118).
 Size preference depended on the setting.
People want trees high in value and strength (250, 251)
People derive more psychological benefits from species diversity in city greenscapes (81, 100.)
Fall color and spring flowers are very important (100) Drivers rate changing seasonal appearance of roadside
vegetation very high (310)
Urban residents preferred deciduous and mixed forests, larger forest blocks, and smoothly trimmed and manmade forest patch boundaries, while rural-urban interface residents preferred evergreen trees, a diverse
landscape with fragmented forest patches, and more complex and natural forest edges (36, 193, 97.) The design
factors in urban design people value most are coherence, mystery, and nature (104.) People prefer “tended”
nature most as a city environment (105), and do not like a brushy understory (25, 257.) Yet, more naturalistic
vegetation can be introduced into parks and green spaces without necessarily making the parks appear unsafe
(115). People prefer forested areas with the characteristics of old growth, rather than an artificial forest (254.)
City dwellers preferred scenes with fewer vehicles, more enclosure, more sound, better upkeep or more unity
(193.) Elements desired in pocket parks were the percentage of ground surface covered by grass, the amount of
trees and bushes visible from the given viewing point, and apparent park size (199.)
Larger green spaces may be more important for health effects than smaller spaces (188)
People like to live near parks, golf courses, and greenways, and are willing to pay a premium for those locations
(194, 195, 197, 198.) Adjacency to parks in a rural area had no significant effect on house prices (195.)
Respondents placed a high value on places for outdoor recreation (257) Yards served territorial needs, common
areas and public athletic fields afforded recreational opportunities, and a nearby wooded area with a pond
provided a highly preferred setting for a variety of nature-related pursuits (256)
Most visitors to nature preserves were willing to pay for the use of wooded recreation areas. Furthermore,
approximately half of the respondents were willing to pay to prevent the conversion of forested parks to another
land-use (274.) Residents in cities of >50,000 supported a tax to provide more city trees (268)
13
Interestingly, rural unpleasant scenes had the most dramatic effect, depressing the beneficial effects of exercise
on three different measures of mood. It appears that threats to the countryside depicted in rural unpleasant
scenes have a greater negative effect on mood than already urban unpleasant scenes. (219)
Consumer Behavior
Consumer behavior is positively correlated with streetscape (298.) Survey respondents from all regions of the
United States favored trees in business districts, and this preference was further reflected in positive district
perceptions, patronage behavior, and product pricing (308.) Forested shopping districts had higher ratings in
quality, place perceptions, shopper patronage and product pricing (311.)
Unfortunately, store owners consistently rate tree benefits lower than shoppers do. (309, 311), and have a
negative perception of trees. Shoppers, though, prefer a full-canopy forest. They rate it high in visual quality and
see it as an integral amenity of the city’s shopping environment (312.)
Judgments of products and merchants were more positive in forested places, as were inferences about product
value, product quality, and merchant responsiveness (302.) Business districts having trees were characterized
as being higher in visual quality and comfort, as providing more positive interaction with merchants, as having
higher-quality products, and generally appearing to be better maintained and kept up (306.)
Consumers claimed they were willing to pay 9 percent more in small cities and 12 percent more in large cities for
equivalent goods and services in business districts having tree (302, 306), travel farther (302, 306), and pay
more for parking (302) in shopping districts with trees and landscaping.
Quasi-rural retail centers face competitive challenges from regional shopping malls, online purchasing, and big
box discount retailers. District merchants must strategically enhance their market position to prevent outshopping. Streetscape trees are a physical improvement that can be used to attract and welcome consumers.
Forest amenities of both wildland and built environments can be used to strengthen local economies (304.)
Respondents preferred landscaped roadsides and report positive retail behavior such as willingness-to-pay 8.8%
more for goods and services in well-landscaped malls (307.)
Recruiting business
“Company decision makers rated recreation/parks/open space to be significantly more important in location
decisions than did economic development officials. Quality of life was rated to be significantly more important by
respondents from small companies, whose organizations relocated or expanded from outside the state, the most
"footloose" companies, and companies in which the ultimate decision maker also relocated with the company.
Respondents from small companies rated recreation/parks/open space first among six quality-of-life elements in
location decisions, while the emphasis among large firms was upon cost of living/housing” (46.)
“The future is in knowledge workers. Knowledge workers will go where there are ample opportunities for
outdoor recreation. Leading technology areas have striven to provide this” (79.)
“Our results suggest that amenities outside the metropolitan area do generate compensating wage differentials,
as workers are willing to accept lower wages to live in accessible proximity to “nice” places. This implies that
these places provide a positive externality to those communities that find them accessible. The estimated effects
are quantitatively important, suggesting that these externalities should be taken into account in policy making.”
(231)
“QOL was most important to companies that moved into Colorado from outside the state, had fewer than eight
employees, were relatively footloose, employed a high proportion of professionals, who perceived ability to
14
attract and retain professional personnel as being a primary concern, and whose ultimate decision-maker
relocated with the company” (170.)
There is broad support for the idea of wilderness areas among young people (40), and availability of recreation
opportunities is a major factor in where retirees live (92). Wilderness experiences {especially important to
young professionals) are very powerful (119.)
Hiking is an excellent recreation opportunity to promote tourism, since it can be marketed for its health benefits
as well as other benefits (225.)
15
References
1.
Abkar, Mahdieh, Mustafa Kamal M.S,, Manohar Mariapan, Suhardi Maulan, Mehdi Sheybani. The Role of
Urban Green Spaces in Mood Change. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(10): 5352-5361,
2010
2.
Anderson, L. M., Cordell, H. K Residential Property Values Improved by Landscaping with Trees Southern
Journal of Applied Forestry, Volume 9, Number 3
3.
Anderson, L.M., and H.K. Cordell Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.):
A survey based on actual sales prices Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 15, Issues 1–2, June 1988,
Pages 153–164 Special Issue: Urban Forest Ecology
4.
Anderson, Soren T., Sarah E. West Open space, residential property values, and spatial context Regional
Science and Urban Economics Volume 36, Issue 6, November 2006, Pages 773–789
.
5.
Annerstedt, Matilda Peter Währborg Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and
observational studies Scand J Public Health June 2011 vol. 39 no. 4 371-388
6.
Anonymous Effects of Forest Stand Density on Human's Physiophychological Changes Kyushu University
Institutional Repository (QIR) Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University
7.
Auger, P.A. (1995), Does Open Space Pay? (Durham, New Hampshire: University of New Hampshire
Cooperative Extension). PhD dissertation not available on line.
8.
Barton Jo and Jules Pretty. What is the Best Dose of Nature and Green Exercise for Improving Mental Health?
A Multi-Study Analysis Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44 (10), pp 3947–3955
9.
Barton, Jo; Murray Griffin, Jules Pretty Exercise-, nature- and socially interactive-based initiatives improve
mood and self-esteem in the clinical population Perspectives in Public Health March 2012 vol. 132 no. 2 8996.
10. Barton,, J. R. Hine, & J. Pretty The health benefits of walking in greenspaces of high natural and heritage
value Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences Volume 6, Issue 4, 2009 pages 261-278
11. Bastian, C. T., McLeod, D. M., Germino, M. J., Reiners, W. A., Blasko, B. J. (2002). Environmental amenities and
agricultural land values: A hedonic model using geographic information systems data. Ecological Economics,
40, 337-349.
12. Behe, B., J. Hardy, S. Barton, J. Brooker, T. Fernandez, C. Hall, J. Hicks, R. Hinson, P. Knight, R. McNiel, T. Page,
B. Rowe, C. Safley, and R. Schutzki, J. Landscape Plant Material, Size, and Design Sophistication Increase
Perceived Home Value Environ. Hort. 23(3):127–133. September 2005
13. Bell, Janice F. PhD, MPH , Jeffrey S. Wilson, PhD, Gilbert C. Liu, MD, MS. Neighborhood Greenness and 2-Year
Changes in Body Mass Index of Children and Youth . American Journal of Preventive Medicine Volume 35,
Issue 6, December 2008, Pages 547–553
14. Benson, E. D., Hansen, J. L., Schwartz Jr., A. L., Smersh, G. T. (1998). Pricing residential amenities: The value
of a view. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16, 55-73.
15. Berman M, Jonides J, Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science.
2008;19(12):1207. .
16
16. Berto, Rita. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity Journal of
Environmental Psychology Volume 25, Issue 3, September 2005, Pages 249–259
17. Betrabet, Gulwadi Gowri. Seeking Restorative Experiences - Elementary School Teachers' Choices for
Places That Enable Coping With Stress Environment and Behavior July 2006 vol. 38 no. 4 503-520
18. Bin Kang; Neighborhoods in Guangzhou, Chine. Dissertation May 2006
19. Bodin , Maria and Terry Hartig Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained
through running? Psychology of Sport and Exercise Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2003, Pages 141–153
20. Bolitzer, B and N.R Netusil The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon Journal of
Environmental Management Volume 59, Issue 3, July 2000, Pages 185–193
.
21. Bond T. Michael, Seiler L. Vicky, Seiler J. Michael Residential Real Estate Prices: A Room with a View.
Journal of Real Estate Research Publisher American Real Estate Society ISSN0896-5803
22. Bowler, Diana E., Lisette M. Buyung-Ali, Teri M. Knight, Andrew S. Pullen. A Systematic Reiview of Evidence
for the Added Benefits to Health of Exposure to Natural Environments. BMC Public Health 2010 10:456
23. Branas, Charles C, Rose A. Cheney, John M. MacDonald, Vicky W. Tam, Tara D. Jackson and Thomas R. Ten
Have A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Health, Safety, and Greening Vacant Urban Space Am. J.
Epidemiol. (2011) 174 (11): 1296-1306. .
24. Bringslimark, Tina, Terry Hartig, Grete Grindal Patil Psychological Benefits of Indoor Plants in Workplaces:
Putting Experimental Results into Context HortScience June 2007 vol. 42 no. 3 581-587
25. Bruce, Hull R. IV Antony Harvey Explaining the Emotion People Experience in Suburban Parks Environment
and Behavior May 1989 vol. 21 no. 3 323-345
26. Brunson, L.B., Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001). Resident appropriation of defensible space in public
housing: Implications for safety and community. Environment & Behavior 33(5), 626-652.
27. Burchett, Margaret, Dr Fraser Torpy, Mr Jason Brennan, Ashley Craig "Greening the Great Indoors for
Human Health and Wellbeing', Wellbeing Improved by Indoor Greenery - Australian UTS Study Final Report
to Horticulture Australia Ltd Completed 15 February 2010 al. University of Technology, Sydney (UTS)
28. Cackowski, Jean Marie; Jack L. Nasar. The Restorative Effects of Roadside Vegetation Implications for
Automobile Driver Anger and Frustration. Environment and Behavior November 2003 vol. 35 no. 6 736-751
29. Cervinka, Renate, Kathrin Röderer, Elisabeth Hefler Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of wellbeing and connectedness with nature. J Health Psychol August 22, 2011
30. Ceylan,, Canan, Jan Dul, Serpil Aytac Can the office environment stimulate a manager's creativity? Human
Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries Volume 18, Issue 6, pages 589–602,
November/December 2008
31. Chang, Chen-Yen and Ping-Kun Chen Human Response to Window Views and Indoor Plants in the
Workplace Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. October 2010, 13(5): 503-512.
doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0308.
32. Chen, Yong and Stuart S. Rosenthal Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun?
Journal of Urban Economics Volume 64, Issue 3, November 2008, Pages 519–537
17
33. Cheng, Wei-Wen; Chien-Tsong Lin, Fang-Hua Chu, Shang-Tzen Chang and Sheng-Yang Wang
Neuropharmacological activities of phytoncide released from Cryptomeria japonica Journal of Wood Science
Volume 55, Number 1 (2009), 27-31,
34. Chiesura, Anna The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 68,
Issue 1, 15 May 2004, Pages 129–
35. Cho, J. M. Seong-Hoon, Bowker and William M. Park Measuring the Contribution of Water and Green Space
Amenities to Housing Values: An Application and Comparison of Spatially Weighted Hedonic Models Journal
of Agricultural and Resource Economics Vol. 31, No. 3 (December 2006), pp. 485-507
36. Cho, Seong-Hoon, Neelam C. Poudyal, Roland K. Roberts Spatial analysis of the amenity value of green open
space. Ecological Economics Volume 66, Issues 2–3, 15 June 2008, Pages 403–416
37. Cimprich, Bernadine PhD, RN, FAAN; Ronis, David L. PhD. An Environmental Intervention to Restore
Attention in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Cancer Nursing: August 2003 - Volume 26 - Issue
4 - pp 284-292
38. Cole, David N. and Troy E. Hall Experiencing the Restorative Components of Wilderness Environments: Does
Congestion Interfere and Does Length of Exposure Matter? Environment and Behavior November 2010 vol.
42 no. 6 806-823
39. Coley, Rebekah Levine; William C. Sullivan, Frances E. Kuo Where Does Community Grow? The Social
Context Created by Nature in Urban Public Housing. Environment and Behavior July 1997 vol. 29 no. 4 468494
40. Cordell, K.: Tarrant, M.; McDonald, B.; Bergstrom. 1998. How the public views wilderness: More results from
the USA survey on recreation and the environment. International Journal of Wilderness. 4(3): 28-31. .
41. Correll, M.R., J.H. Lilly Dahl and L.D. Singell (1978), The Effects of Greenbelts on Residential Property Values:
Some Findings on the Political Economy of Open Space, Land Economics 54:2, 207-217.
42. Coughlin, R.E. and T. Kawashima (1973), Property Values and Open Space in Northwest Philadelphia: An
Empirical Analysis Discussion Paper No. 4 Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, University of
Pennsylvania.
43. Crompton, J. L. (2004). The Proximate Principle: The Impact of Parks and Open Space on Property Values and
the Property Tax Base. Ashburn, Virginia: National Recreation and Park Association. This article is the
winner of the Real Estate Valuation manuscript prize (sponsored by The Appraisal Institute) presented at
the 2001 American Real Estate Society Annual Meeting.
44. Crompton, J. L. 2001. The Impact of Parks and Open Space on Property Values and the Property Tax Base.
Ashburn, VA National Recreation and Park Association.
45. Crompton, J. L.; Love, L. L.; More, T. A. An empirical study of the role of recreation, parks and open space in
companies' (re)location decisions. Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration, 15(1) 37-58.
46. Crompton, John L. Competitiveness: Parks and Open Space as Factors Shaping a Location’s Success in
Attracting Companies, Labor Supplies, and Retirees Chapter 5 in The Economic Benefits of Land
Conservation The Trust for Public Land Edited by Constance T.F. de Brun.
47. Crompton, John L. Perceptions of How the Presence of Greenway Trails Affects the Value of Proximate
Properties Journal of Park and Recreation Administration Volume 19, Number 3 Fall 2001 pp.114-132,
18
48. Crompton, John L. The impact of parks on property values: empirical evidence from the past two decades in
the United States Managing Leisure Volume 10, Issue 4, 2005 pages 203-218.
49. Culp, Robert P. Predicting Days on Market: The Influence of Environmental and Home Attributes New York
Economic Review vol. 39, Fall 2008, p. 70-84
50. Curran, Deborah Economic Benefits of Natural Greenspace Protection in Brittish Columbia The Polis Project
on Ecological Governance and Smart Growth Brittish Comumbia. May 2001. .
51. de Korta, Y.A.W., A.L. Meijndersa, A.A.G. Sponseleeb, W.A. IJsselsteijna. What's wrong with virtual trees?
Restoring from stress in a mediated environment Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume 26, Issue 4,
December 2006, Pages 309–320
52. de Vries S, Verheij R A, Groenewegen P P, Spreeuwenberg P, 2003, "Natural environments - healthy
environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment
and Planning A 35(10) 1717–1731
53. Dehring, Carolyn and Neil Dunse Housing Density and the Effect of Proximity to Public Open Space in
Aberdeen, Scotland Real Estate Economics Volume 34, Issue 4, pages 553–566, Winter 2006
54. Des Rosiers, François, Thériault Marius, Kestens Yan, Villeneuve Paul (2002). Landscaping and house
values: An empirical investigation. Journal of Real Estate Research, 23, 139-161.
55. Diamond, D.B. Jr. (1980) The Relationship Between Amenities and Urban Land Prices, Land Economics 56:1,
21-32.
56. Diamond, N. K., Standiford, R. B., Passof, P. C., LeBlanc, J. (1987). Oak trees have varied effect on land values.
California Agriculture, 41, number 9 pg 4-6.
57. Diener, Ed, and Martin E.P. Seligman Beyond Money Toward an Economy of Well-Being Psychological
Science in the Public Interest July 2004 vol. 5 no. 1 1-31
58. Diette, Gregory B. MD, MHS; Noah Lechtzin, MD, MHS, Edward Haponik, MD, CCP, Aline Devrotes, RN and
Haya R. Rubin, MD, PhD Distraction Therapy With Nature Sights and Sounds Reduces Pain During Flexible
Bronchoscopy A Complementary Approach to Routine Analgesia CHEST March 2003 vol. 123 no. 3 941-948
59. Dijkstraa, K. , M.E. Pieterseb, A. Pruyna Stress-reducing effects of indoor plants in the built healthcare
environment: The mediating role of perceived attractiveness Preventive Medicine Volume 47, Issue 3,
September 2008, Pages 279–283
60. Dillen, Sonja, M E van Sjerp de Vries, Peter P Groenewegen, Peter Spreeuwenberg Greenspace in urban
neighbourhoods and residents' health: adding quality to quantity. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:e8
doi:10.1136/jech.2009.104695
61. Dimke, Kelley C Valuation of Tree Canopy on Property Values of Six Communities in Cincinnati, Ohio
OhioLINK ETD Center, Ohio State Univ. 2008
62. Do, A. Q., Grudnitski, G. (1995). Golf courses and residential house prices: An empirical examination. Journal
of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10, 261-270.
63. Dombrow, J., Rodriguez, M., Sirmans, C. F. (2000). The market value of mature trees in single-family housing
markets. The Appraisal Journal, 68, 39-43.
19
64. Donovan, Geoffrey H. Yvonne L. Michael, David T. Butry, Amy D. Sullivan,, John M. Chase, Urban trees and
the risk of poor birth outcomes Health & Place Volume 17, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages 390–393
65. Donovan, Geoffrey H., and Jeffrey P. Prestemon, The Effect of Trees on Crime in Portland, Oregon
Environment and Behavior January 2012 vol. 44 no. 1 3-30
66. Donovan, Geoffrey H., David T. Butry Trees in the city: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon Landscape
and Urban Planning Volume 94, Issue 2, 28 February 2010, Pages 77–83
67. Doxey, Jennifer, Tina Marie Waliczek, Jayne M. Zajicek The Impact of Interior Plants in University
Classrooms on Student Course Performance and on Student Perceptions of the Course and Instructor
HortScience April 2009 vol. 44 no. 2 384-391
68. Dravigne, Andrea, Tina Marie Waliczek, R.D. Lineberger and J.M. ZajicekThe Effect of Live Plants and
Window Views of Green Spaces on Employee Perceptions of Job Satisfaction HortScience February 2008 vol.
43 no. 1 183-187
69. Dyment, J. E,. and A. C. Bell Grounds for movement: green school grounds as sites for promoting physical
activity Health Educ. Res. (2008) 23 (6): 952-962.
70. Ellis, Christopher D. Sang-Woo Lee, Byoung-Suk Kweon Retail land use, neighborhood satisfaction and the
urban forest: an investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landscape and
Urban Planning Volume 74, Issue 1, 1 January 2006, Pages 70–78 .
71. Espey, M., Owusu-Edusei, K. (2001). Neighborhood Parks and Residential Property Values in Greenville,
South Carolina. Clemson, South Carolina: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Clemson
University.
72. Faber-Taylor, Andrea, Frances E. Kuo and William C. Sullivan Coping with ADD The Surprising Connection
to Green Play Settings Environment and Behavior January 2001 vol. 33 no. 1 54-77
73. Faber-Taylor, Andrea, Frances E. Kuo Children With Attention Deficits Concentrate Better After Walk in the
Park Journal of Attention Disorders March 2009 vol. 12 no. 5 402-409
74. Farley, K. M.J.; Veitch, J. A.A Room With A View: A Review of the Effects of Windows on Work and Well-Being
National Research Council Canada Research Report, NRC Institute for Research in Construction 2001 Report
#:RR-136
75. Fjeld, Tove. The Effect of Interior Planting on Health and Discomfort among Workers and School Children
HortTechnology January-March 2000 vol. 10 no. 1 46-52
76. Fjeld, Tove; Bo Veiersted, Leiv Sandvik, Geir Riise, Finn Levy The Effect of Indoor Foliage Plants on Health
and Discomfort Symptoms among Office Workers. Indoor and Built Environment July 1998 vol. 7 no. 4 204209
77. Fjørtoft, Ingunn, Jostein Sageie. The natural environment as a playground for children: Landscape
description and analyses of a natural playscape Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 48, Issues 1–2, 20
April 2000, Pages 83–97
78. Flannigan, John An evatluation of residets attitudes to street trees in southwest England Arboricultural
Journal: The International Journal of Urban Forestry pages 219-241 Volume 28, Issue 4, 2005
79. Florida, Richard Competing in the age of talent. Environmental amenities and the new economy. January
2000 A Report Prepared for the R. K. Mellon Foundation, Heinz Endowments, and Sustainable Pittsburgh
20
80. Frey ,Janet, Talbot and Rachel Kaplan The Benefits of Nearby Nature for Elderly Apartment Residents The
International Journal of Aging and Human Development Issue: Volume 33, Number 2 / 1991 Pages: 119 130
81. Fuller Richard A., Katherine N Irvine, Patrick Devine-Wright, Philip H Warren and Kevin J Gaston
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity Biol. Lett. 22 August 2007 vol. 3 no. 4 390394
82. Gao, Xiaolu and Yasushi Asami, Tsinghua Science & Technology Volume 10, Issue 3, June 2005, Pages 344–
353
83. Garrod, G.D., and K.G. Willis Valuing goods' characteristics: An application of the hedonic price method to
environmental attributes. Journal of Environmental Management Volume 34, Issue 1, January 1992, Pages
59–76.
84. Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open space in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19, 91-98.
85. Geoghegan, J., Lynch, L., Bucholtz, S. (2003). Capitalization of open space into housing values and the
residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource
Economics Review, 32, 33-45.
86. Getz, Dale A., Alexander Karow, and J. James Kielbaso Inner city prererences for trees and urban forestry
programs. Journal of Arboriculture 8(10): October 1982 A
87. Gillard, Q. (1981), “The Effect of Environmental Amenities on House Values: The Example of a View Lot,”
Professional Geographer 22 (May), 216-220.
88. Gladwell, V. F., D. K. Brown, J. L. Barton, M. P. Tarvainen, P. Kuoppa, J. Pretty, J. M. Suddaby and G. R. H.
Sandercock The effects of views of nature on autonomic control European Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume 81 / 2000 - Volume 112 / 2012 .
89. Grinde, Bjørn Biophilia: Does Visual Contact with Nature Impact on Health and Well-Being? Int. J. Environ.
Res. Public Health 2009, 6(9), 2332-2343;
90. Gulwadi, Gowri Betrabet Seeking Restorative Experiences - Elementary School Teachers' Choices for Places
That Enable Coping With Stress. Environment and Behavior July 2006 vol. 38 no. 4 503-520
91. Habarth, Janice M. Sandra A. Graham-Bermann, Eric A. BermannCoping in Context - Community and Natural
Resources in Low-Income Women's Environments. Environment and Behavior March 2009 vol. 41 no. 2 205232
92. Haigood, T. L., and Crompton, J. L. 1998. The role of recreation amenities in retiree relocation decisions.
Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 16 (1): 25–45.
93. Hamilton, S. and M. Quayle (1999), Corridors of Green and Gold: Impact of Riparian Suburban Greenways on
Property Values (Vancouver: Fraser River Action Plan, Department of Fisheries and Oceans).
94. Hammer, T. R., Coughlin, R. E., Horn, E. T., IV (1974). Research report: The effect of a large park on real estate
value. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 40, 274-277
95. Han, Ke-Tsung Influence of Limitedly Visible Leafy Indoor Plants on the Psychology, Behavior, and Health of
Students at a Junior High School in Taiwan Environment and Behavior September 2009 vol. 41 no. 5 658-692
21
96. Hansmann, Ralf; Stella-Maria Hug, and Klaus Seeland Restoration and stress relief through physical
activities in forests and parks Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Volume 6, Issue 4, 15 November 2007,
Pages 213–225
97. Hardy, Jill, Bridget K. Behe, Susan S. Barton, Thomas J. Page, Robert E. Schutzki, Karl Muzii, R. Thomas
Fernandez, Mary Taylor Haque, John Brooker, Charles R. Hall, Roger Hinson, Patricia Knight, Robert McNiel,
D. Bradley Rowe, and Charles Safley Consumers Preferences for Plant Size, Type of Plant Material and
Design Sophistication in Residential Landscaping J. Environ. Hort. 18(4):224–230.
98. Hartig, Terry, Marlis Mang and Gary W. Evans Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences
Environment and Behavior January 1991 vol. 23 no. 1 3-26
99. Hartig, Terry, Gary W Evans, Larry D Jamner, Deborah S Davis, Tommy Gärling Trackingrestoration in
natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental psychology Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2003, Pages
109–123.
100.
Heimlich, Joseph , T. Davis Sydnor, Matthew Bumgardner, and Patrick O’Brien. Attitudes of Residents
Toward Street Trees on Four Streets in Toledo, Ohio, U.S. Before Removal of Ash Trees (Fraxinus spp.) from
Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2008. 34(1):47–53.
101.
Henk, Staats; Arenda Kieviet, Terry Hartig Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancyvalue analysis of environmental preference Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume 23, Issue 2, June
2003, Pages 147–157
102.
Henry, Mark S. Landscape Quality and the Price of Single Family Houses: Further Evidence from
Home Sales in Greenville, South Carolina J. Environ. Hort. 17(1):25–30. March 1999
103.
Herrick, C. (1939). The effects of parks upon land real estate values. The Planning Journal, 5, 89-94
104.
Herzog, Thomas R.. A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental
Psychology Volume 9, Issue 1, March 1989, Pages 27–43 .
105.
Herzog, Thomas R and Sarah J. Strevey Contact With Nature, Sense of Humor, and Psychological WellBeing Environment and Behavior November 2008 vol. 40 no. 6 747-776
106.
Herzog, Thomas R., and Ashley E. Rector Perceived Danger and Judged Likelihood of Restoration
Environment and Behavior May 2009 vol. 41 no. 3 387-401
107.
Herzog, Thomas R., Stephen Kaplan and Rachel Kaplan The prediction of preference for unfamiliar
urban places Population & Environment Volume 5, Number 1 (1982), 43-59
108.
Heschong L. Windows and Classrooms: a study of student performance and the indoor environment.
California Energy Commission. 2003.
109.Heschong, L - Energy, 2003 Windows and offices: A study of office worker performance and the indoor
environment: - California Energy Commission technical report.
110.
Heynen, Nik, Harold A. Perkins, Parama Roy The Political Ecology of Uneven Urban Green Space The
Impact of Political Economy on Race and Ethnicity in Producing Environmental Inequality in Milwaukee.
Urban Affairs Review September 2006 vol. 42 no. 1 3-25
111.
Hobden, David W., Gary E Laughton, Katherine E Morgan Green space borders—a tangible benefit?
Evidence from four neighbourhoods in Surrey, British Columbia, 1980–2001 Land Use Policy Volume 21,
Issue 2, April 2004, Pages 129–138
22
112.
Irwin, Elena G., The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values Land Economics November 1,
2002 vol. 78 no. 4 465-480
113.
Irwin, E. G., Bockstael, N. E. (2001). The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects
of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 698-704. 188
114.
Jim, C. Y., Chen, W. Y. (2006). Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in
Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 422-434.
115.
Jones, K., and J. Simmons. 1995. The Retail Environment. New York: Routledge. Journal of Retailing
50(4):29–38.
116.
Jorgensen, Anna, James Hitchmough, Tig Calvert Woodland spaces and edges: their impact on
perception of safety and preference Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 60, Issue 3, 15 August 2002,
Pages 135–150
117.
Joye, Yannick, Kim Willems, Malaika Brengman, Kathleen Wolf The effects of urban retail greenery on
consumer experience: Reviewing the evidence from a restorative perspective Urban Forestry & Urban
Greening Volume 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 57–64
118.
Kalmbach, Kevin L. and J. James Kielbaso Resident attitudes toward selected characteristics of street
tree plnating. Journal of Arboriculture 5(6): June 1979 129
119.
Kaplan, Rachel Wilderness perception and psychological benefits: An analysis of a continuing program
Leisure Sciences: An InterdisciplinaryApproach. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal pages Volume
6, Issue 3, 1984 pp 271-290
120.
Kaplan, Rachel Nature at the doorstep: Residential satisfaction and the nearby environment. Journal of
Architectural and Planning Research, Vol 2(2), Jun 1985, 115-127.
121.
Kaplan, Rachel The Nature of the View from Home - Psychological Benefits Environment and Behavior
July 2001 vol. 33 no. 4 507-542
122.
Kaplan, Rachel The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning
Volume 26, Issues 1–4, October 1993, Pages 193–201 .
123.
Kaplan, Rachel and Janet Frey Talbot Landscape Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: A review
and recent findings Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 15, Issues 1–2, June 1988, Pages 107–117
Special Issue: Urban Forest Ecology
124.
Kaplan, Rachel, Lisa V. Bardwell, Harry A. Ford & Stephen Kaplan The corporate back 40: Employee
benefits of wildlife enhancement efforts on corporate land. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International
Journal Volume 1, Issue 2, 1996 pages 1-13
125.
Kaufman, D. A., Cloutier, N. R. (2006). The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential
property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33, 19-30. .
126.
Kelly, Margaret C.H. and Matthew Zieper. Chattanooga and Other Cities Invest in Parks and Open Spaces
Chapter 15 Cities Going Green: A Handbook of Best Practices The Economic Benefits of Parks and Open
Spaces: How Land Conservation Helps Communities Grow Smart and Protect the Bottom Line. Roger L.
Kemp, Carl J. Stephani editors.
127.
Kestens, Y., Thériault, M., Des Rosiers, F. (2004). The impact of surrounding land use and vegetation on
single-family house prices. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 539-567.
23
128.
Kestens, Yan, Marius Thériault, François Des Rosiers. House Prices and Environmental Quality:
Combining GIS, Image Analysis and Hedonic Modelling. 6th Annual Intergrating GIS 2002
129.
Kjærsti Raanaas, Ruth, Grete Grindal Patil, Terry Hartig, Health benefits of a view of nature through the
window: a quasi-experimental study of patients in a residential rehabilitation center Clin Rehabil January
2012 vol. 26 no. 1 21-32
130.
Kline, Grace A.. Does A View of Nature Promote Relief From Acute Pain? Holist Nurs September 2009
vol. 27 no. 3 159-166
131.
Kniesel, R. (1979), The Impact of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission on the Local
Housing Market: A Study of the South Coast Regional Commission, PhD Dissertation, University of California,
Riverside.
132.
Koichi, igawahara, Takaya Norimasa, Kagawa Takahide, Park Bum Jin Relationship between mental
evaluation and physical factor of forest bathing at health resort in late autumn. Environmental Information
Science Pages 229-234(2005)
133.
Korpela, Kalevi M., Matti Ylén, Liisa Tyrväinen and Harri Silvennoinen Favorite green, waterside and
urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland Health Promot. Int. (2010) 25
(2): 200-209.
134.
Korpela, Kalevi M., Matti Ylén Perceived health is associated with visiting natural favourite places in the
vicinity Health & Place Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2007, Pages 138–151
135.
Kuo Frances E;. Magdalena Bacaicoa William C. Sullivan Transforming Inner-City Landscapes - Trees,
Sense of Safety, and Preference Environment and Behavior January 1998 vol. 30 no. 1 28-59
136.
Kuo, Frances E. and William C. Sullivan Environment and Crime in the Inner City Does Vegetation
Reduce Crime? Environment and Behavior May 2001 vol. 33 no. 3 343-367
137.
Kuo, F.E. Horticulture, Well-Being and Mental Health: From Intuition to Evidence ISHS Acta
Horticulturae 639: XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Expanding Roles for Horticulture in Improving
Human Well-Being and Life Quality
138.
Kuo, Frances E. Coping with Poverty Impacts of Environment and Attention in the Inner City
Environment and Behavior January 2001 vol. 33 no. 1 5-34
139.
Kuo, Frances E. and William C. Sullivan Aggression and Violence in the Inner City - Effects of
Environment via Mental Fatigue Environment and Behavior July 2001 vol. 33 no. 4 543-571 S.
140.
Kuo, Frances E. PhD, and Andrea Faber Taylor, PhD A Potential Natural Treatment for AttentionDeficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence From a National Study. American Journal of Public Health:
September 2004, Vol. 94, No. 9, pp. 1580-1586.
141.
Kuo, Frances E; William C. Sullivan, Rebekah Levine Coley and Liesette Brunson Fertile Ground for
Community: Inner-City Neighborhood Common Spaces American Journal of Community Psychology Volume
26, Number 6 (1998), 823-851
142.
Kusuhara, Masatoshi; Kenichi Urakami, Yoko Masuda, Vicent Zangiacomi, Hidee Ishirii, Sachiko Tai
Biomedical Research Vol. 33 (2012) No. 1 P 57-61 Fragrant environment with α-pinene decreases tumor
growth in mice Biomedical Research Vol. 33 (2012) No. 1 P 57-61
24
143.
Kweon, Byoung-Suk, Roger S. Ulrich, Verrick D. Walker, and Louis G. Tassinary Anger and Stress - The
Role of Landscape Posters in an Office Setting Environment and Behavior May 2008 vol. 40 no. 3 355-381
144.
Kweon, Byoung-Suk; William C. Sullivan, Angela R. Wiley. Green Common Spaces and the Social
Integration of Inner-City Older Adults Environment and Behavior November 1998 vol. 30 no. 6 832-858
145.
Kyushu University Institutional Repository (QIR)Effects of Forest Stand Density on Human's
Physiophychological Changes Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu Universit Departmental Bulletin
Paper
146.
Lafortezza,, Raffaele, Giuseppe Carrusc, Giovanni Sanesia, Clive Davies Benefits and well-being
perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Volume 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 97–108
147.
Landry, Shawn M and Jayajit Chakraborty Street trees and equity: evaluating the spatial distribution of
an urban amenity Environment and Planning 2009 volume 41(11) pages 2651 – 2670
148.
Laumann, Karin, Tommy Gärling, Kjell Morten Stormarkc Selective attention and heart rate responses
to natural and urban environments Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2003,
Pages 125–134
149.
Leather, Phil, Mike Pyrgas, Di Beale, Claire Lawrence Windows in the Workplace Sunlight, View, and
Occupational Stress Environment and Behavior November 1998 vol. 30 no. 6 739-762
150.
Lee J, B.,-J. Park, Y. Tsunetsugu, T. Ohirac, T. Kagawa, Y Miyazaki Effect of forestbathing on physiological
and psychological responses in young Japanese male subjects Public Health Volume 125, Issue 2 , Pages 93100, February 2011.
151.
Lee, A.C.K., and R. Maheswaran, The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence
Public Health (2011) 33 (2): 212152.
Lee, Juyoung ; Bum-Jin Park, Yuko Tsunetsugu, Takahide Kagawa & Yoshifumi Miyazaki Restorative
effects of viewing real forest landscapes, based on a comparison with urban landscapes Scandinavian
Journal of Forest Research Volume 24, Issue 3, 2009 pages 227-234
153.
Leggett, Christopher G. and Nancy E. Bockstael Evidence of the Effects of Water Quality on Residential
LandPrices Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Volume 39, Issue 2, March 2000, Pages
121–144
154.
Lerner, S., and Poole, W. 1999. The Economic Benefits of Parks and Open Spaces: How Land
Conservation Helps Communities Grow Smart and Protect the Bottom Line. San Francisco, CA: The Trust for
Public Lands.
155.
Levine, Rebekah, ColeWilliam C. Sullivan, Frances E. Kuo Where Does Community Grow? -The Social
Context Created by Nature in Urban Public Housing Environment and Behavior July 1997 vol. 29 no. 4 468494
156.
Li , Qing Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function Environmental Health and Preventive
Medicine Volume 15, Number 1 (2010), 9-17,
157.
Li Q, Morimoto K, Kobayashi M, Inagaki H, Katsumata M, Hirata Y, Hirata K, Suzuki H, Li YJ, Wakayama Y,
Kawada T, Park BJ, Ohira T, Matsui N, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y, Krensky AM. Visiting a forest, but not a city,
increases human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins. Int J Immunopathol
Pharmacol. 2008 Jan-Mar;21(1):117-27.
25
158.
Li Q, Morimoto K, Kobayashi M, Inagaki H, Katsumata M, Hirata Y, Hirata K, Shimizu T, Li YJ, Wakayama
Y, Kawada T, Ohira T, Takayama N, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. A forest bathing trip increases human natural
killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins in female subjects. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2008
Jan-Mar;22(1):45-55.
159.
Li Q, Morimoto K, Nakadai A, Inagaki H, Katsumata M, Shimizu T, Hirata Y, Hirata K, Suzuki H, Miyazaki Y,
Kagawa T, Koyama Y, Ohira T, Takayama N, Krensky AM, Kawada T. Forest bathing enhances human natural
killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007 Apr-Jun;20(2
Suppl 2):3-8. .
160.
Li, Qing , Toshiaki Otsuka, Maiko Kobayashi, Yoko Wakayama, Hirofumi Inagaki, Masao Katsumata,
Yukiyo Hirata, YingJi Li, Kimiko Hirata and Takako Shimizu, et al. Acute effects of walking in forest
environments on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters European Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume 111, Number 11 (2011), 2845-2853
161.
Li, Qing and Tomoyuki Kawada Healthy forest parks make healthy people: Forest environments
enhance human immune function. Department of Hygene and Pulic Health, Tokyo Japan. (No journal citation
provided)
162.
Li, Qing, Ari Nakadai, Hiroki Matsushima, Yoshifumi Miyazaki, Alan M. Krensky, Tomoyuki Kawada and
Kanehisa Morimoto Phytoncides (Wood Essential Oils) Induce Human Natural Killer Cell Activity.
Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology2006, Vol. 28, No. 2 , Pages 319-333
163.
Li, Qing, Maiko Kobayashi and Tomoyuki Kawada Relationships Between Percentage of Forest Coverage
and Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR) of Cancers in all Prefectures in Japan The Open Public Health
Journal, 2008, 1, 1-7 1 1874-9445/08 2008 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
164.
Lichtenfeld, Stephanie, Andrew J. Elliot, Markus A. Maier, Reinhard Pekrun Green Facilitates Creative
Performance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull June 2012 vol. 38 no. 6 784-797
165.
Lindholm, Gunilla Schoolyards - The Significance of Place Properties to Outdoor Activities in Schools
Environment and Behavior May 1995 vol. 27 no. 3 259-293
166.
Lindsey, Greg, Joyce Man, Seth Payton, Kelly Dickson Property Values, Recreation, and Urban
Greenways Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration Volume 22, Number 3 Fall 2004 pp 69-90
167.
Liu G, Wilson J, Qi R, Ying J. Green neighborhoods, food retail and childhood overweight: differences by
population density. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2007;21(4S):317-325..
168.
Lohr, Virginia I., Caroline H. Pearson-Mims Physical Discomfort May Be Reduced in the Presence of
Interior Plants HortTechnology January-March 2000 vol. 10 no. 1 53-58
169.
Lohr, Virginia I.; Caroline H. Pearson-Mims Responses to Scenes with Spreading, Rounded, and Conical
Tree Forms Environment and Behavior September 2006 vol. 38 no. 5 667-688
170.
Love, Lisa L and John L Crompton The Role of Quality of Life in Business (Re)Location Decisions
Journal of Business Research Volume 44, Issue 3, March 1999, Pages 211–222
171.
Luttik, Joke The value of trees, water and openspace as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 48, Issues 3–4, 1 May 2000, Pages 161–167
172.
Lutzenhiser, Margot and Noelwah R. Netusil The Effect of Open Spaces on a Home’s Sale Price
Contemporary Economic Policy Volume 19, Issue 3, pages 291–298, July 2001
26
173.
Maas, J ; R A Verhei, S de Vrie, P Spreeuwenber, F G Schellevis,, P P Groenewegen Morbidity is related to
a green living environment Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2009; 63:967-973
174.
Maas, J, Spreeuwenberg P, Van Winsum-Westra M, Verheij R A, de Vries S, Groenewegen P P, 2009, "Is
green space in the living environment associated with people’s feelings of social safety?" Environment and
Planning A 41(7) 1763 – 1777
175.
Maas, Jolanda Robert A Verheij, Peter P Groenewegen, Sjerp de Vries, Peter Spreeuwenberg, J Green
space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:587-592
176.
Maas, Jolanda , Robert A Verheij1, Peter Spreeuwenberg and Peter P Groenewegen Physical activity as a
possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis BMC
Public Health 2008, 8:206
177.
Maas, Jolanda, Sonja M.E. van Dillen, , Robert A. Verheija, , Peter P. Groenewegena, c Social contacts as a
possible mechanism behind the relation between greenspace and health, Health & Place Volume 15, Issue 2,
June 2009, Pages 586–595
178.
Mackay, Graham J. and James T. Neill The effect of “green exercise” on state anxiety and the role of
exercise duration, intensity, and greenness: A quasi-experimental study Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume 11, Issue 3, May 2010, Pages 238–245
.
179.
Maller Cecily; Mardie Townsend, Anita Pryor, Peter Brown and Lawrence St Leger Healthy nature
healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations Health
Promot. Int. (March 2006) 21 (1): 45-54.
180.
Malone, Karen, and Paul J. Tranter School Grounds as Sites for Learning: Making the most of
environmental opportunities Environmental Education Research Volume 9, Issue 3, 2003 pp 283-303.
Drawing on the findings of an ARC funded project, 'Children's Environments and the Role of School Grounds
for Enhancing Environmental Cognition' .
181.
Mansfield, Carol, Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, William McDow, Robert McDonald, Patrick Halpin Shades of
Green: Measuring the value of urban orests in the housing market. Journal of Forest Economics Volume 11,
Issue 3, 1 December 2005, Pages 177–199
182.
Martin, Karen, PhD. Putting Nature back into Nurture: he Benefits of Nature for Children A Literature
Review Prepared for: The Department of Sport and Recreation, Government of Western Australia
February, 2011
183.
Matsuoka, Rodney H . Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links. Landscape
and Urban Planning Volume 97, Issue 4, 30 September 2010, Pages 273–282
184.
McCoy, Janetta Mitchell & Gary W. Evans The Potential Role of the Physical Environment in Fostering
Creativity Creativity Research Journal Volume 14, Issue 3-4, 2002 pages 409-426 .
185.
Miller, Andrew Ross Thesis (M.Arch. and S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of
Architecture, 2001. Valuing open space: land economics and neighborhood parks
186.
Mitchell , Richard Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical
activity in other environments? Social Science & Medicine Available online 8 May 2012
187.
Mitchell, R., and Popham, F. (2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an
observational population study Lancet, 372 (9650). pp. 1655-1660. ISSN 0140-6736 (doi:10.1016/S01406736(08)61689-X) .
27
188.
Mitchell, Richard, Thomas Astell-Burt, Elizabeth A Richardson A comparison of green space indicators
for epidemiological research Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health J Epidemiol Community Health
2011;65:853-858
189.
Morales , Dominic J. The Contribution of Trees to Residential ProperyValue Journal of Arboriculture
6(11): November 1980 305
190.
Morancho, Aurelia Bengochea A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban
Planning Volume 66, Issue 1, 15 December 2003, Pages 35–41
191.
Morita, E.; S. Fukuda, J. Nagano, N. Hamajima, H. Yamamoto, Y. Iwai, T. Nakashima, H. Ohira, T. Shirakawa
Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: Shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing, walking) as
a possible method of stress reduction Public health 1 January 2007 (volume 121 issue 1 Pages 54-63 DOI:
10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.024)
192.
Morita, Emi, Mariko Naito, Asahi Hishida, Kenji Wakai, Atsuyoshi Mori, Yatami Asai, Rieko Okada, Sayo
Kawai and Nobuyuki Hamajima. No association between the frequency of forest walking and blood pressure
levels or the prevalence of hypertension in a cross-sectional study of a Japanese population. Environmental
Health and Preventive Medicine Volume 16, Number 5 (2011), 299-306
193.
Nasar, Jack L. Environmentalcorrelates of evaluativeappraisals of centralbusiness district scenes.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 14, 1987, Pages 117–130
194.
Neumann, Bradley C., Kevin J. Boyle, Kathleen P. Bell. Property price effects of a national wildlife
refuge: Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge in Massachusetts Land Use Policy Volume 26, Issue 4,
October 2009, Pages 1011–1019
195.
Nicholls, Sarah and John L. Crompton. Impacts of Regional Parks on Property Values in Texas Journal of
Park and Recreation Administration Volume 23, Number 72 Summer 2005 pp. 87-108
196.
Nichols, Sarah Measuring the impact of parks on property values: new research shows that green
spaces increase the value of nearby housing Parks & Recreation March, 2004
197.
Nichols, Sarah 2002 Does open space pay? : measuring the impacts of green spaces on property values
and the property tax base? Abstract. Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A & M University, 2002..
198.
Nichols, Sarah, and John L. Compton The Impact of Greenways on Property Values:
Austin, Texas Joumal of Insure Research 2005, Vot. 37, No. 3, pp. 321-341
Evidence from
199.
Nordh H., T., Hartig C.M. Hagerhall, G. Fry Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility
for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Volume 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 225–235
.
200.
Ohtsuka, Y.; Noriyuki Yabunaka and Shigeru Takayama Shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing and walking)
effectively decreases blood glucose levels in diabetic patients International Journal of Biometeorology
Volume 41, Number 3 (1998), 125-127
201.
Orland, Brian The Effect of Street Trees on Perceived Values of Residential Property Environment and
Behavior May 1992 vol. 24 no. 3 298-325. Also published as Orland, Brian, Joanne Vining and Angela Ebreo
The Effect of Street Trees on Perceived Values of Residential Property Urban Stud August 2006 vol. 43 no. 9
1537-1547
202.
Ottosson Johan & Patrick Grahn The Role of Natural Settings in Crisis Rehabilitation: How Does the
Level of Crisis Influence the Response to Experiences of Nature with Regard to Measures of Rehabilitation?
Landscape Research pages 51-70 Volume 33, Issue 1, 2008
28
203.
Park, Bum-Jin Katsunori Furuya, Tamami Kasetanic Norimasa Takayama, , Takahide Kagawa Yoshifumi
Miyazaki , Relationship between psychological responses and physical environments in forest settings
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 102, Issue 1, 30 July 2011, Pages 24–32
204.
Park, B.J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Morikawa, T., Kagawa, T. & Miyazaki, Y. 2009. Physiological effects
of forest recreation in a young conifer forest in Hinokage Town, Japan. Silva Fennica 43(2): 291–301.
205.
Park, Bum Jin, Yuko Tsunetsugu, Tamami Kasetani, Takahide Kagawa and Yoshifumi Miyazaki The
physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field
experiments in 24 forests across Japan Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Volume 15, Number 1
(2010), 18-26,
206.
Park, Bum-Jin ; Yuko Tsuneetsugu, Tamami Kaselani, Hideki Hirano, Takahide Kagaw, Masahiko Sato.
Physiological Effects of Shinrin-yoku (Taking in the Atmosphere of the Forest)—Using Salivary Cortisol and
Cerebral Activity as Indicators J.of Physiogical Anthropology Vol 26 (2007) pp 123-128
207.
Park, Bum-Jin; Yuko Tsunetsugu, Hideki Ishiic, Suguru Furuhashi, Hideki Hirano, Takahide Kagawa &
Yoshifumi Miyazaki Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) in a mixed
forest in Shinano Town, Japan Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Volume 23, Issue 3, 2008 pp278-283
208.
Park, S.H.; R.H. Mattson, E. Kim Pain Tolerance Effects of Ornamental Plants in a Simulated Hospital
Patient Room. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 639: XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Expanding Roles for
Horticulture in Improving Human Well-Being and Life Quality
209.
Park, Seong-Hyun and Richard H. Mattson Therapeutic Influences of Plants in Hospital Rooms on
Surgical Recovery HortScience February 2009 vol. 44 no. 1 102-105
210.
Park, Seong-Hyun Randomized clinical trials evaluating therapeutic influences of ornamental indoor
plants in hospital rooms on health outcomes of patients recovering from surgery. Dissertation Doctor of
Philosophy Department: Department of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources 2006
http://hdl.handle.net/2097/227
211.
Park, Seong-Hyun and Richard H. Mattson Effects of Flowering and Foliage Plants in Hospital Rooms
on Patients Recovering from Abdominal Surgery HortTechnology October-December 2008 vol. 18 no. 4 563568
212.
Parsons, George R. The effect of coastal land use restrictions on housing prices: A repeat sale analysis
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Volume 22, Issue 1, January 1992, Pages 25–37
213.
Parsons, Russ, Louis G. Tassinary, Roger S. Ulrich, Michelle R. Hebl, Michele Grossman-Alexander The
View From the Road: Implications for Stress Recovery and Immunization Journal of Environmental
Psychology Volume 18, Issue 2, June 1998, Pages 113–140 .
214.
Peiser, R., Schwann, G. (1993). The private value of public open space within subdivisions. Journal of
Architectural and Planning Research, 10, 91-104. Not available on line
215.
Phillips, Spencer Windfalls for Wilderness: Land Protection and Land Value in the Green Mountains
USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-2. 2000
216.
PKF Consulting (1994), Analysis of Economic Impacts of the Northern Central Rail Trail, (Baltimore,
Maryland: Maryland Greenways Commission).
217.
Pretty, Jules How nature contributes to mental and physical health Spirituality and Health
International Volume 5, Issue 2, pages 68–78, June 2004
29
218.
Pretty, J., J. Peacock, R. Hine, M. Sellens, N. South & M. Griffin Green exercise in the UK countryside:
Effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning Journal of
Environmental Planning and Management Volume 50, Issue 2, 2007, pages 211-231
219.
Pretty, Jules, Jo Peacock, Martin Sellens & Murray Griffin The mental and physical health outcomes of
green exercise International Journal of Environmental Health Research Volume 15, Issue 5, 2005 pages 319337
220.
Quayle, Moura and Stan Hamilton Corridors of Green and Gold Fraser River Action Plan Department of
Fisheries and Oceans Vancouver, B.C. April 1999
221.
Raanaas, Ruth Kjærsti; Grete Grindal Patil, Terry Hartig Effects of an Indoor Foliage Plant Intervention
on Patient Well-being during a Residential Rehabilitation Program HortScience March 2010 vol. 45 no. 3
387-392
222.
Raanaas, Ruth Kjærsti; Grete Grindal Patil, Terry Hartig Health benefits of a view of nature through the
window: a quasi-experimental study of patients in a residential rehabilitation center Clin Rehabil January
2012 vol. 26 no. 1 21-32
223.
Ready, R., Abdalla, C. (2003). The Impact of Open Space and Potential Local Disamenities on Residential
Property Values in Berks County, Pennsylvania. University Park, PA: Department of Agricultural Economics
and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University
224.
Richardson, Elizabeth A., Richard Mitchell, Terry Hartig, Sjerp de Vries, Thomas Astell-Burt, Howard
Frumkin Green cities and health: a question of scale? J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:160-165
doi:10.1136/jech.2011.137240 Research report.
225.
Rodrigues, Áurea; Elisabeth Kastenholz, Apolónia Rodrigues Hiking as a relevant wellness activity results of an exploratory study of hiking tourists in Portugal applied to a rural tourism project Journal of
Vacation Marketing October 2010 vol. 16 no. 4 331-343
226.
Rodriquez, M., and C.F. Sirmans (1994), “Quantifying the Value of a View in Single-Family Housing
Markets,” Appraisal Journal 62 (October), 600-603.
227.
Ryan, Richard M, Netta Weinsteine, Jessey Bernsteinb, Kirk Warren Brownc, Louis Mistrettaa,
Marylène Gagnéd Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature Journal of Environmental Psychology
Volume 30, Issue 2, June 2010, Pages 159–168
228.
Sander, Heather A. Stephen Polasky The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic
pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA Land Use Policy Volume 26, Issue 3, July 2009, Pages
837–845.
229.
Sander, Heather, Stephen Polasky, Robert G. Haight The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property
price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA Ecological Economics Volume 69, Issue 8, 15
June 2010, Pages 1646–1656
230.
Saphores, Jean-Daniel and Wei Li Estimating the value of urban green areas: A hedonic pricing analysis
of the single family housing market in Los Angeles, CA Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 104, Issues 3–
4, 15 March 2012, Pages 373–387 .
231.
Schmidt, Lucie and Paul N. Courant Sometimes Close is Good Enough: the Value of Nearby
Enbironmental Amenities. Journal of Regional Science Volume 46, Issue 5, pages 931–951, December 2006.
.
30
232.
School of Natural Resources and Environment at the University of Michigan. Environment and Behavior
July 2001 vol. 33 no. 4 507-542
233.
Schroeder, H. W., and S. R. Ruffolo. 1996. Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb.
Journal of Arboriculture 22(1):35–43.
234.
Schroeder, Herbert W. and Steven R. Ruffolo Householders' evaluation of street trees in suburban
Chicago In Managing Urban and High Use Recreation Settings edited by: Paul H. Gobster (1993)
235.
Schroeder, Herbert, Flannigan, John, Coles, Richard Residents' Attitudes Toward Street Trees in the UK
and U.S. Communities Journal Articles, USDA Authors, Peer-Reviewed 2006 .
236.
Schroeder, T. D. The relationship of local park and recreation services to residential property values
Journal of Leisure Research 1982 Vol. 14 No. 3 pp. 223-234 .
237.
Sheets, Virgil L. and Chris D. Manzer Affect, Cognition, and Urban Vegetation Some Effects of Adding
Trees Along City Streets Environment and Behavior May 1991 vol. 23 no. 3 285-304
238.
Shibata, Seij L. and Naoto Suzuki. Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology Volume 45, Issue 5, pages 373–381, November 2004 .
239.
Shin, Won Sop The influence of forest view through a window on job satisfaction and job stress.
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Volume 22, Issue 3, 2007 pages 248-253 .
240.
Smith, Andrew, Michael Pitt Sustainable workplaces: improving staff health and well-being using plants
Journal of Corporate Real Estate (2009)
241.
Sommer, R., H. Guenther, and P. A. Barker. 1990. Surveying householder response to street trees.
Landscape Journal 9(2):79–85.
242.
Sommer, Robert Further Cross-National Studies of Tree Form Preference Ecological Psychology Volume
9, Issue 2, 1997
243.
Staats, Henk; Arenda Kievieta, Terry Hartigb Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancyvalue analysis of environmental preference Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume 23, Issue 2, June
2003, Pages 147–157 .
244.
Stark Mary Ann Restoring Attention in Pregnancy The Natural Environment. Clin Nurs Res August 2003
vol. 12 no. 3 246-265
245.
Stigsdotter, Ulrika K., Forest & Landscape Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Ola Ekholm,
Jasper Schipperijn, Mette Toftager, Finn Kamper-Jørgensen, Thomas B. Randrup Health promoting outdoor
environments - Associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based
on a Danish national representative survey Scand J Public Health June 2010 vol. 38 no. 4 411-417
246.
Strife, Susan and Liam Downey Childhood Development and Access to Nature A New Direction for
Environmental Inequality Research. Organization Environment March 2009 vol. 22 no. 1 99-122
247.
Sugiyama, T, E Leslie, B Giles-Corti, N Owen Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and
mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? J
Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:e9 doi:10.1136/jech.2007.064287
248.
Sullivan , William C. Frances E. Kuo, and Stephen F. Depooter The Fruit of Urban Nature - Vital
Neighborhood Spaces Environment and Behavior September 2004 vol. 36 no. 5 678-700
31
249.
Summit, Joshua An Exploratory Study of Preferred Tree Form Environment and Behavior July 1995 vol.
27 no. 4 540-557
250.
Summit, Joshua and Robert Sommer Further Studies of Preferred Tree Shapes Environment and
Behavior July 1999 vol. 31 no. 4 550-576
251.
Sun, Jidong, Jong-Min Woo, Won Kim, Seuon Kyeon-Lim, Eun-Job Chung. The Effect of Cognitive
Behavior Therapy-Based “Forest Therapy” Program on Blood Pressure, Salivary Cortisol Level, and Quality of
Life in Elderly Hypertensive Patients. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension 2012, Vol. 34, No. 1 , Pages 1-7
.
252.
Tajima, Kayo New Estimates of the Demand for Urban Green Space: Implications for Valuing the
Environmental Benefits of Boston's Big Dig Project. Journal of Urban Affairs Volume 25, Issue 5, pages 641–
655, December 2003
253.
Takano, T, K Nakamura, M Watanabe Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in
megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:913-918
doi:10.1136/jech.56.12.913 Research report
254.
Takayama, Norimasa The therapeutic effect of taking in the atmosphere of a forest MMV4 proceedings
Posters 516-520
255.
Talbot, J.F.; Kaplan, S. 1986. Perspectives on wilderness: reexamining the value of extended wilderness
experiences. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 6: 177-188.
256.
Talbot, Janet F.; Bardwell, Lisa V.; Kaplan, Rachel The functions of urban nature: Uses and values of
different types of urban nature settings. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol 4(1), Mar 1987,
47-63.
257.
Talbot, Janet Frey and Rachel Kaplan Needs and Fears: the Response to Trees and Nature in the Inner
City. Journal of Arboriculture 10(8): August 1984
258.
Tang, Joyce W. MLAa & Robert D. Brown MLA, PhDb The Effect of Viewing a Landscape on Physiological
Health of Elderly Women Journal of Housing For the Elderly Volume 19, Issue 3-4, 2006
259.
Taylor, Andrea Faber, Frances Kuo, William C. Sullivan. Views of Nature and Self-discipline: Evidence
from Inner City Children. Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume 22, Issues 1–2, March 2002, Pages
49–63
260.
Taylor Frances Andrea Faber Frances E.Kuo Children With Attention Deficits Concentrate Better After
Walk in the Park Journal of Attention Disorders March 2009 vol. 12 no. 5 402-409 .
261.
Taylor, Andrea Faber, Angela Wiley, and William C. Sullivan Growing Up in the Inner City - Green Spaces
as Places to Grow Environment and Behavior January 1998 vol. 30 no. 1 3-27
262.
Taylor, Andrea Faber, Frances E. (Ming) Kuo Could Exposure to Everyday Green Spaces Help Treat
ADHD? Evidence from Children's Play Settings. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being vol 3, issue 3,
Nov 2011 pp 281-303
263.
Taylor, Andrea Faber,Frances E. Kuo, William C. Sullivan Coping with ADD: the Surprising Connection to
Green Play Settings. Environment and Behavior January 2001 vol. 33 no. 1 54-77
264.
Tennessen, Carolyn M., Bernadine Cimprich Views to nature: Effects on attention Journal of
Environmental Psychology Volume 15, Issue 1, March 1995, Pages 77–85
32
265.
Thayerd, Julian F. Bart Verkuilj, Jos F. Brosschotjj. Kampschroer Kevine. Anthony Westb, Carolyn
Sterling, Israel C. Christieb, Darrell R. Abernethya, John J. Sollersd, Giovanni Cizzac, Andrea H. Marques,
Esther M. Sternberg Effects of the physical work environment on physiological measures of stress.
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology August 2010 vol. 17 no. 4 431-439 European Journal of
Preventive Cardiology August 2010 vol. 17 no. 4 431-439
266.
Thompson, R., R. Hanna, J. Noel, D. Piirto Valuation of Tree Aesthetics on Small Urban-Interface
Properties Journal of Arboriculture September 1999
267.
Thorsnes, P. (2002). The value of a suburban forest preserve: Estimates from sales of vacant residential
building lots. Land Economics, 78, 426-441.
268.
Treiman, Thomas and Justine Gartner Are Residents Willing to Pay for their Community Forests?
Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey in Missouri, USA. Missouri Department of Conservation Resource
Science, 1110 College Avenue, Columbia, Missouri 65201, USA,
269.
Troy, A., Grove, J. M. (2008). Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 233-245.
270.
Troy, Austin, J. Morgan Grove, Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne The relationship between tree canopy and crime
rates across an urban–rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landscape and Urban Planning
Volume 106, Issue 3, 15 June 2012, Pages 262–270
271.
Tsumatsuga, Yuku; Bum-Jin Park, Yoshifumi Miyazaka Trends in research related to “Shinrin-yoku”
(taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing) in Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Volume 15, Number 1 (2010), 27-37
272.
Tsunetsugu, Y, Park BJ, Lee J, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. [Psychological relaxation effect of forest therapy:
results of field experiments in 19 forests in Japan involving 228 participants. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2011
Sep;66(4):670-6
273.
Tsunetsugu, Yuko; Bum-Jin Park, Heideki Ishii, Hideki Hirano, Takahiwe Agawa, Yoshifmi Miyazaki
Physiological Effects of Shinrin-yoku (Taking in the Atmosphere of the Forest) in an Old-Growth Broadleaf
Forest in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan Journal of Physiological Anthropology
274.
Tyrväinen L, Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland Journal of Environmental
Management Volume 62, Issue 1, May 2001, Pages 75–92
275.
Tyrväinen, Liisa The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 37, Issues 3–4, July 1997, Pages 211–222
276.
Tyrväinen, Liisa and Antti Miettinen Property Prices and Urban Forest Amenities. Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management Volume 39, Issue 2, March 2000, Pages 205–223
277.
Tzoulasa, Konstantinos, Kalevi Korpelab, , Stephen Vennc, , Vesa Yli-Pelkonenc, , Aleksandra
Kaźmierczaka, , Jari Niemelac, , Philip Jamesa, Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using
Green Infrastructure: A literature review Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 81, Issue 3, 20 June 2007,
Pages 167–178
278.
Ulrich, Roger S Visual landscapes and psychological well‐being Landscape Research Volume 4, Issue 1,
1979 pages 17-23
279.Ulrich, Roger S. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 13,
1986, Pages 29–44
33
280.
Ulrich, Roger S. Natural Versus Urban Scenes Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environment and
Behavior September 1981 vol. 13 no. 5 523-556
281.
Ulrich, Roger S. Robert F. Simons Barbara D. Losito Evelyn Fiorito Mark A. Miles Michael Zelson Stress
recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume
11, Issue 3, September 1991, Pages 201–230
282.
Ulrich, Roger, S. Addoms, David L. Leather, P., Pyrgas, M., Beale, D. and C. Lawrence Psychological and
Recreational Benefits of a Residential Park. Windows in the workplace: sunlight, view, and occupational
stress. Environment and Behavior, 30: 739- 762.
283.
Ulrich, RS View through a window may influence recovery from surgery Science 27 April 1984: Vol. 224
no. 4647 pp. 420-421
284.
Valtchanov, Deltcho , Kevin R. Barton, and Colin Ellard Effects of Horticultural Therapy on Mood and
Heart Rate in Patients Participating in an Inpatient Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Program Journal of
Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation: September/October 2005 - Volume 25 - Issue 5 - pp 270-274
285.
Van den Berg Agnes E, Sander L Koole, Nickie Y van der Wulp Environmental preference and
restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2003,
Pages 135–146
286.
Van Den Berg, Agnes E., Terry Hartig, Henk Staats Preference for Nature in Urbanized Societies: Stress,
Restoration, and the Pursuit of Sustainability Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 87, Issue 3, 15
September 2008, Pages 233–245
287.
van den Berg, Agnes E., Jolanda Maas, Robert A. Verheij, Peter P. Groenewegen, Green space as a buffer
between stressful life events and health Social Science & Medicine Volume 70, Issue 8, April 2010, Pages
1203–1210
288.
van Dillen, Sonja M E; Sjerp de Vries, Peter P Groenewegen, Peter Spreeuwenberg Greenspace in urban
neighbourhoods and residents' health: adding quality to quantity J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:e8
doi:10.1136/jech.2009.104695
289.
Velardea, Ma., G. Fryb, M. Tveitb Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in
environmental psycholog Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Volume 6, Issue 4, 15 November 2007, Pages
199–212
290.
Vrooman, D. H. (1978). An empirical analysis of determinants of land values in the Adirondack Park.
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 37, 165-177.
291.
Weicher, J. C., Zerbst, R. H. (1973). The externalities of neighborhood parks: An empirical investigation.
Land Economics, 49, 99-105 Abstract and full text not available on line.
292.
Weinstein, Netta; Andrew K. Przybylski, Richard M. RyanCan Nature Make Us More Caring? Effects of
Immersion in Nature on Intrinsic Aspirations and Generosity Pers Soc Psychol Bull October 2009 vol. 35 no.
10 1315-1329
293.
Wells Nancy M. and Gary W. Evans Nearby Nature - A Buffer of Life Stress among Rural Children
Environment and Behavior May 2003 vol. 35 no. 3 311-330
294.
Wells, Nancy M. At Home with Nature - Effects of “Greenness” on Children’s Cognitive Functioning
Environment and Behavior November 2000 vol. 32 no. 6 775-795
34
295.
Wells, Nancy M. and Gary W. Evans Nearby Nature - A Buffer of Life Stress among Rural Children
Environment and Behavior May 2003 vol. 35 no. 3 311-330
296.
Wheeler, B, Cooper A, Page A, Jago R. Greenspace and children's physical activity: A GPS/GIS analysis of
the PEACH project. Preventive Medicine. 2010.
297.
White, Randy Interaction with Nature During the Middle Years: It’s Importance to Children’s
Development and Nature’s Future © 2004 White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group.
298.
Wichrowski, Matthew HTR; Whiteson, Jonathan MD; Haas, François PhD; Mola, Ana RN, ANP; Rey,
Mariano J. MD Effects of Horticultural Therapy on Mood and Heart Rate in Patients Participating in an
Inpatient Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Program Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation:
September/October 2005 - Volume 25 - Issue 5 - pp 270-274
299.
Williams, Kathleen L.. Public Response to the Urban Forest in Inner City Business Districts. Journal of
Arboriculture 29(3): May 2003
300.
Williams, Kathryn, and David Harvey. Transcendent Experience in Forest Environments. Journal of
Environmental Psychology Volume 21, Issue 3, September 2001, Pages 249–260
301.
Willis, K. G. and G. D. Garrod. Amenity Value of Forests in Great Britain and its Impact on the Internal
Rate of Return from Forestry. Forestry (1992) 65 (3): 331-346. doi: 10.1093/forestry/65.3.331
302.
Willis, K.G. & G.D. Garrod. Not from experience: A comparison of experts’ opinions and hedonic price
estimates of the incremental value of property attributable to an environmental feature. Journal of Property
Research Volume 10, Issue 3, 1993 pages 193-216.
303.
Wolf , Kathleen L. More in Store - Research on City Trees and Retail
No. 2
Arborist News April 2009 Vol. 18,
304.
Wolf, Kathleen L . Business District Streetscapes, Trees, and Consumer Response. Journal of Forestry,
Volume 103, Number 8, December 2005 , pp. 396-400(5) .
305.
Wolf, Kathleen L. Public Response to the Urban Forest in Inner City Business Districts. Journal of
Arboriculture 29(3): May 2003 .
306.
Wolf, Kathleen L . Trees in the Small City Retail Business District: Comparing Resident and Visitor
Perceptions. Journal of Forestry, Volume 103, Number 8, December 2005 , pp. 390-395(6) Wolf, Kathleen
L. Strip Malls, City Trees, and Community Values. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2009. 35(1):33– 40.
307.
Wolf, Kathleen L. Business District Streetscapes, Trees, and Consumer Response. Journal of Forestry,
Volume 103, Number 8, December 2005 , pp. 396-400(5)
308.
Wolf, Kathleen L. Freeway Roadside Management – the Urban Forest Beyond the White Line Journal of
Arboriculture 29(3): May 2003
309.
Wolf, Kathleen L. Nature in the Retail Environment: Comparing Consumer and Business Response to
Urban Forest Conditions. Landscape Journal 23:1–04 .
310.
Wolf, Kathleen L. The Environmental Psychology of Shopping - Assessing the Value of Trees Research
Review Vol 14 No. 3, 2007 pp 39-43.
311.
Wolf, Kathleen L. Trees and the Business District - Preference: a Case Study of Athens Georgia. , U.S.
Journal of Arboriculture 30(6): November 2004
35
312.
Won Sop Shin The influence of forest view through a window on job satisfaction and job stress
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Volume 22, Issue 3, 2007 pages 248-253 .
313.
Woo, Jong-Min; Won Kim, Seoung-Kyeon Lim, Eun-Joo Chung The Effect of Cognitive Behavior
Therapy-Based “Forest Therapy” Program on Blood Pressure, Salivary Cortisol Level, and Quality of Life in
Elderly Hypertensive Patients Clinical and Experimental Hypertension 2012, Vol. 34, No. 1 , Pages 1-7
314.
Yamaguchi, M. Deguchi, M.; Miyazaki, Y. The Effects of Exercise in Forest and Urban Environments on
Sympathetic Nervous Activity of Normal Young Adults The Journal of International Medical Research, Volume
34, Number 2
315.
Ylén, Kalevi M. Matti , Liisa Tyrväinen and Harri Silvennoinen Favorite green, waterside and urban
environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promot. Int. (2010) 25 (2):
200-209.
36
Download