DRAFT LOGFRAME FOR RWANDA MULTI DONOR CIVIL SOCIETY SUPPORT PROGRAMME
PROJECT NAME
Rwanda Multi Donor Civil Society Support Programme
IMPACT
Impact Indicator 1
Baseline
(2012)
Governance in Rwanda is
more
accountable,
inclusive and evidence
based.
World Governance Indicator
on Voice and Accountability
14.22
Milestone
2015
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone Dec
2019
Milestone
2020
Target
2021
15
16
17
18
19
20
Planned
Achieved
Source: World Governance Indicators (repeated annually)
Impact Indicator 2
Baseline
2014
Milestone
2015
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Milestone
2020
Target
2021
Improved collaboration and
working relations between
civil society and Government.
0
0
Improved
understandi
ng
and
clarity
of
directives,
and
application
of the law.
Improved
clarity
around
directives,
regulations
and
mandates,
with some
relaxation
of
laws
governing
CSOs.
CSOs
searching for
funds,
spending
increasing
amounts of
time on
administratio
n, becoming
less
innovative
and creative,
and becoming
more inward
looking.
CSOs see some
decrease in
bureaucracy,
and are
encouraged to
be more
innovative and
creative
Enhanced
institutional
transparency
and
accountability
for CSOs, with
improved
internal
governance
and stronger
constituency
base.
More
positive
attitudes and
relationships
between
CSOs
and
government,
with more
cooperation,
dialogue,
consultation
and
discussion
and
less
confrontatio
n.
Planned
Achieved
Source: Rwanda Governance Board Reports, and Programme reports backed by full case study evidence and Outcome Mapping.
1
Impact Indicator 3
% of Human Rights Universal
Periodic Review
recommendations
implemented (reviewed at
mid-term of UPR process
i.e.2013, 2017)
Planned
Baseline
(2013)
Milestone
2015
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Milestone
2020
Target
2021
61 of 127 (30%)
recommendatio
ns from 2011
UPR fully
implemented
0
At least
45% of
recommend
ations fully
implemente
d at time of
next UPR.
At least
50% of
recommend
ations fully
implemente
d at time of
next UPR.
At least 55%
of
recommendat
ions fully
implemented
at time of
next UPR..
At least 60% of
recommendati
ons fully
implemented
at time of next
UPR.
At least 65%
of
recommendat
ions fully
implemented
at time of
next UPR.
At least 70%
of
recommendat
ions fully
implemented
at time of
next UPR.
Source: http://www.upr-info.org/followup/assessments/session23/rwanda/MIA-Rwanda.pdf
2
OUTCOME
Outcome
Indicator 1
Baseline
Milestone
2015
Civil society becomes
increasingly effective at
influencing government
on key policy issues,
and supporting social
cohesion
and
reconciliation,
good
governance and human
rights.
Number
of
demonstrated
changes in public
policy
and
implementation
where there is
evidence
that
engagement by
programme
partners
contributed
to
the change.
0 cases
0
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Assumptions
1. Government does not view CSOs or
the fund as a threat to its interests.
2). Government is interested in engaging
constructively with CSOs.
3) Government provides CSOs with
sufficient political space to advocate on
issues of concern.
4)
CSO partners are sufficiently
emboldened to advocate on issues
assumed to be politically sensitive.
5) CSO partners supported by the fund
do not engage in activities that
government views as harmful to national
and social unity.
Plan
ned
Achi
eved
Source: Programme reports backed by full case study evidence and Outcome Mapping.
Outcome
Indicator 2
Baseline
Milestone
DEC 2015
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Civil
society
impact
on
influencing public
policy;
holding
state and private
corporations
accountable;
empowering
citizens
and
meeting societal
To be set at
inception
phase.
0
Limited
response
from
Government
on concerns
raised by CSO
on public
policy.
Increased
Government
engagement
in policy
dialogues
with CSOs
and citizens
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
3
needs.
Pla
nne
d
Ach
iev
ed
Source: Annual report, Regular Reports, M&E records and Outcome Mapping
Outcome
Indicator 3
Number of CSOs
supported
to
improve
their
capacity
for
advocacy
and
respond
to
priorities
identified
by
citizens.
Pla
nne
d
Baseline
Milestone
Dec 2015
To be set at
inception
phase.
Capacity
Building
Assessment
s for CSO
Identified
during
Inception
Phase.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Ach
iev
ed
Source: Source: Capacity building Assessments and Inception Phase Report.
Inputs(£)
DFID(£)
Gov’t(£)
Other(£)
Total
DFID Share (%)
Input(HR)
DFID (FTEs)
4
OUTPUT 1
Output
Indicator
1.1
Baseline
Milestone
Dec 2015
Milestone
2016
Rwandan
CSOs
gain capacity to
contribute
more
effectively
to
strengthening
public
accountability,
social
cohesion,
rights and good
governance.
Service
provider
identified
to deliver
programme
.
To be set
at
inception
phase.
Service
provider
commences
work
in
Rwanda.
Inception
Phase
delivered, and
benefitting
CSOs
identified,
Due diligence
and
other
assessments
delivered.
Administrative
& financial,
M&E and
governance
systems for
CSOs partners
established.
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Assumptions
6) Capacity building of CSOs will lead to
sustainable transformations in the way that CSOs
work.
7) CSOs improved capacity to deliver results and
be credible gap-fillers leads to increased
government interest in genuine dialogue.
8) Access to donor funds does not undermine
incentives for CSOs to develop their membership
base and does not distort their agenda away from
the demands of CSOs’ own constituencies.
9) Facilitated partnerships model of capacity
builds proves attractive and useful to CSOs
partners.
Plann
ed
10) Facilitated partnership model of capacity
building proves attractive and useful to CSO
partners
Achie
ved
Source: Inception report, programme design report, and CSO DD Assessments.
Output
Indicator
1.2
Baseline
Milestone
August 2015
On
sight
mobilisatio
0
Service provider
set up
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
5
n
operations in
country.
Plann
ed
Achie
ved
Source: Inception report, programme design report, and CSO DD Assessments.
Output
Indicator
1.3
Baseline
Milestone
Dec 2015
Service
provider
defines
approach
and
Identifies
partners.
0
Contacts
established
and
benefiting
partners
identified.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Assumptions
Planned
Achieve
d
Source: Capacity building Assessment reports of CSO partners and Quarterly and Annual Programme Reports
Output
Indicator
1.4
Organisatio
nal capacity
of CSO
partners
(financial
Planned
Baseline
Milestone
Dec 2015
0
Needs
Identified and
outline
delivered.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Achieve
6
managemen
t, strategic
planning,
operational
planning).
IMPACT
WEIGHTING (%)
30%
Output
Indicator
1.5
Strength of
CSO
partners’
internal
governance
(accountabil
ity to
membershi
p,
functional
board
structures).
INPUTS (£)
DFID
(£)Approx.
30% of total
funding
INPUTS (HR)
DFID (FTEs)
d
Source: Capacity building Assessment reports of CSO partners and programme and Quarterly and Annual Programme Reports.
Planned
Baseline
Milestone
Dec 2015
0
Discussions
initiated to
Identify needs
and outline
delivered.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Achieve
d
Source: Outline of needs report.
Govt (£)
Other (£)
Target
2020
RISK RATING
Medium
Facilitated partnerships, coaching, mentoring, staff
secondments, training on research and advocacy,
support for organisational development and strategy
formulation for CSOs and networks
Total (£)
DFID SHARE (%)
7
OUTPUT 2
Rwandan CSOs
implement
initiatives to
strengthen
public
accountability,
social cohesion,
rights and good
governance.
Output Indicator
2.1
Number of grants
to CSOs working at
local level and
national levels.
Baseline
Milestone
Dec 2015
CSO Grant
Fund
Operational
arrangements
(including
Due
Diligence)
documented
in inception
report and
approved by
Steering
Committee.
Milestone
Dec 2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
11) CSOs are willing and able to adapt to
the new and dynamic legislative
environment, and to the different funding
incentives and standards offered by the
fund and other CSOs programmes.
12) The fund provides sufficient financial
resources to support CSO programmes on
a meaningful scale.
13) CSOs have sufficient absorption
capacity to use donor funds.
Planned
Achieved
Source: Discussions and Assessment with CSO partners.
Output Indicator
Baseline
2.2
% of CSO
partners meeting
goals set out in
their strategic and
operational plans.
Assumptions
Milestone
Dec 2015
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
0
10% of CSO
partners
achieving 20%
of their
operational
targets.
15% of CSO
partners
achieving
20% of their
operational
targets.
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
14) CSO partners use grant funds
according to a clear programme of
activities.
15) Fiduciary risks monitored and
managed.
16) Donor funding from different sources
(e.g. One UN fund) is well coordinated.
17) Access to donor funds does not
undermine incentives for CSOs to develop
their membership base and does not
distort their agenda away from the
demands of CSOs’ own constituencies.
Planned
Achieved
Source: Internal reviews conducted by service provider. Crosschecked by external annual reviews.
IMPACT
WEIGHTING (%)
Output Indicator
2.3
Baseline
Milestone
2015
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
8
30%
INPUTS (£)
% of grant
operations funded
by the programme
evaluated as
satisfactory or
better at
completion of
each grant.
Planned
DFID (£)
Approx.
30% of
total
funding
0
0
Achieved
Source
RISK RATING
Medium-High
Govt (£)
Other (£)
Grant facilities:

Total (£)
DFID SHARE (%)
Strategic opportunities fund with 3 graduated funding tiers
Starter level (<£10,000)
mid-level (£10-30,000)
large grants (£30-200,000)
 Selective use of competitive call for proposals
Innovation grants for higher risk or experimental initiatives
INPUTS (HR)
DFID (FTEs)
9
OUTPUT 3
Government
capacity and
mechanisms to
engage with civil
society
strengthened.
Output Indicator
3.1
Extent to which
approach has been
defined and
agreed.
Baseline
Milestone
Dec 2015
Approach to,
and focus
of Governme
nt capacity
building
documented
in inception
report, agreed
with RGB and
approved by
Steering
Committee
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2021
Assumptions
18).
Meaningful
and
constructive
engagement between civil society and
government takes place, rather than empty
consultation.
19) Government does not tighten
restrictions on CSO operations and
registration.
Planned
20) Continued willingness of government
at all administrative levels to engage
constructively with CSOs.
Achieved
Source: Inception and implementation Reports.
Output Indicator
3.2
Measure of CSO
satisfaction with
their level of
access to
government and
possibility to
engage
substantively on
issues of public
accountability,
social cohesion,
rights and good
governance
Output Indicator
3.3
Measure of CSO
satisfaction with
Baseline
Planned
0
Milestone
Dec 2015
Questionnaire
defined and
agreed.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Achieved
Source: Annual questionnaire survey to be conducted by service provider. Quality controlled by external annual
reviews
Baseline
Planned
0
Milestone
Dec 2015
Questionnaire
defined and
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Milestone
2020
Target
2021
10
JADF meetings and
perceptions as to
whether JADF
meetings are
responsive to
priorities
expressed by CSOs.
Output Indicator
3.4
% of CSO partners
expressing the
view that their
activities have
been constrained
by government
regulation and
controls (e.g.
registration
requirements)
Output Indicator
3.5
Measure
of
satisfaction
of
government
officials of the
quality
and
usefulness of their
engagement with
CSOs on issues of
public
accountability,
social
cohesion,
rights and good
governance.
agreed.
Achieved
Source: Annual questionnaire sent to JADF participants in target districts
Baseline
Planned
0
Milestone
Dec 2015
Questionnaire
defined and
agreed.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Achieved
Source: Annual questionnaire survey to be conducted by Service Provider. Quality controlled by external annual reviews.
Baseline
Planned
0
Milestone
Dec 2015
Questionnaire
defined and
agreed.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Assumptions
21) Current and future directives from
government maintain the same level of
operating space for civil society
organisations and other relevant actors
(e.g. private sector).
Target
2020
Achieved
Source: Annual questionnaire survey to be conducted by Service Provider. Quality controlled by external annual reviews.
11
IMPACT
WEIGHTING (%)
25%
RISK RATING
Medium High
INPUTS (£)
Approx. 15% of
total funding
INPUTS (HR)
DFID (FTEs)
Govt (£)
Other (£)
Technical assistance for local and national government and CSOs in
support of dialogue structures (e.g. National Dialogues, JADF
processes)
Total (£)
DFID SHARE (%)
12
OUTPUT 4
CSOs share and
use learning on
effective
engagement in
strengthening
public
accountability,
social cohesion,
rights and good
governance.
Output Indicator
4.1
Extent to which
approach has been
defined and
agreed.
Baseline
0
Milestone
Dec 2015
Approach to
lesson
learning
documente
d
in
inception
report and
approved by
Steering
Committee.
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Assumptions
22) CSOs build trust within networks and
recognise the value of experience sharing.
23) CSOs are able to use lessons learned
from engagement with the fund to
strengthen organisational structures and
internal governance.
Planned
Achieved
Source: Inception and management reports.
Output Indicator
4.2
Documented
instances where a
CSO partner has
adopted
lessons
from
the
experience
of
other
CSO
partners.
Baseline
0
Milestone
2015
0
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Planned
Achieved
Source: Internal reviews conducted by service provider. Crosschecked by external annual reviews.
Output Indicator
4.3
Satisfaction of CSO
partners with the
value added of
participating in
networks
facilitated by the
Baseline
Planned
0
Milestone
2015
0
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Achieved
Source: Annual questionnaire survey to be conducted by Service Provider. Quality controlled by external annual reviews.
13
programme.
IMPACT
WEIGHTING (%)
15%
Output Indicator
4.4
Strength of CSO
partners networks
with other CSOs
and Government
Actors.
INPUTS (£)
DFID (£)
INPUTS (HR)
DFID (FTEs)
Baseline
Planned
0
Milestone
2015
0
Milestone
2016
Milestone
2017
Milestone
2018
Milestone
2019
Target
2020
Achieved
Source: Facilitated self-assessment by CSO partners supported by the programme. Peer review by other CSOs.
Approx.
10% of total
funding
Govt (£)
Other (£)
Technical and financial support for network building and sharing
of lessons and experience.
RISK RATING
Low
Total (£)
DFID SHARE (%)
14
15