Information and Knowledge Management Assignment 2: Country Based Policy Analysis Implementation Strategy Page 1 Geneva, August 2012 DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Mandate and rationale ............................................................................................................... 3 2. Uses and users of the Decent Work Country Policy Analyses .................................................... 4 3. The Decent Work Country Policy Analyses ................................................................................. 5 What will they be like? .................................................................................................................... 5 What technical inputs will they draw on? ...................................................................................... 6 What will be the process for their development? .......................................................................... 7 4. Implementation strategy ............................................................................................................ 8 Vision and strategic framework ...................................................................................................... 8 Supply – tools ................................................................................................................................ 10 Supply – capacity........................................................................................................................... 11 Demand ......................................................................................................................................... 13 An enabling environment ............................................................................................................. 13 Country Analyses........................................................................................................................... 14 5. Reporting and evaluation.......................................................................................................... 15 6. Logical framework – key elements ........................................................................................... 17 7. Logical framework – intervention plan ..................................................................................... 23 Acronyms Common Country Analysis Decent Work Country Programme Decent Work Country Policy Analysis Decent Work Team Regional Office United Nations Development Assistance Framework United Nations Development Assistance Programme Page 2 CCA DWCP DWCPA DWT RO UNDAF UNDAP DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 1. Mandate and rationale The Programme and Budget 2012-2013 places special emphasis on information and knowledge management with the objective of improving the ILO’s services to Constituents and achieving operational synergies. Three inter-related assignments were initiated as a result of decisions of the Governing Body and the Director General1: 1. Global Research and Publications 2. Country Based Policy Analysis 3. Information and Knowledge Management Gateway The present document provides an implementation strategy for Assignment 2. This assignment addresses the need of Constituents and ILO offices and staff at different levels for country-level analysis relevant to the 2008 Social Justice Declaration and the Decent Work Agenda. While in most countries a large quantity of relevant data and reports are available, they are not brought together in an easily accessible and functional format. No analysis is available that reflects the 2008 Declaration’s vision that the four pillars of the Decent Work Agenda, employment, social protection, social dialogue, and respect for rights, and the cross-cutting theme of gender equality, are inseparable, interrelated, and mutually supportive. This limits the ability of the Constituents and the ILO to conduct evidence-based advocacy for effective Decent Work policies, or (in the case of Governments) to formulate such policies. It also means that the ILO’s view on the Decent Work situation and policy options in a country is not unequivocally stated and presented in a single document. This affects its influence with development partners at the country level and in global debates relevant to Decent Work. Assignment 2 will therefore develop a service of the ILO to its Constituents and for internal use that will apply a common methodology for analysing available data and findings, gaps and polices related to the 2008 Declaration and the Decent Work Agenda. The end-product of the service will be Decent Work Country Policy Analyses2, which will provide succinct, coherent, integrated and easy-to-read summaries and analysis of the Decent Work situation and policies in a country and provide strategic policy options for the further promotion of Decent Work for all women and men. The Decent Work Country Policy Analysis (DWCPA) methodology will build on lessons learned and existing good practice for integrated Decent Work country analysis conducted by Country Offices, Decent Work Teams (DWTs) and Regional Offices (ROs), the Global Jobs Pact approach, Decent Work Country Profiles, and other country level reviews. The DWCPAs will be different from each of these other products because they cover all four strategic pillars of the Decent Work Agenda and the cross-cutting theme of gender, consider their interrelationships and have a primarily practical purpose, i.e. be an instrument in the hands of Constituents and ILO Country Offices. Having DWCPAs available to member States at times when policies and plans are being formulated will allow the ILO and its Constituents to better position decent work issues at the national level, and relate them to key national policy frameworks, reform processes, and cooperation frameworks. It will also allow the DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page Director General’s Minute on Special Assignments on Information and Knowledge Management, 30.8.2011 and Governing Body Room document 310, March 2011 2 Earlier documents referred to scans. While this terminology was possible in English, Spanish and French translations would not be appropriate. A better name is under consideration. 3 1 ILO and its Constituents to more strongly advocate and promote the centrality of the Decent Work Agenda in national, regional and global policy debates and forums. The assignment therefore directly supports the implementation of the 2008 Social Justice Declaration. 2. Uses and users of the Decent Work Country Policy Analyses Concretely, the following uses of the DW Country Policy Analyses are foreseen: Serve as a programmatic instrument for the development, renewal and evaluation of Decent Work Country Programmes (DWCPs) Serve as a strategic and technical input for use in national tripartite policy dialogue Offer technical inputs to the development of national policies and plans Contribute to analysis and planning frameworks including the Common Country Analysis (CCA), the UN Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF), the UN Development Assistance Programme (UNDAP) and those of other development partners Indicate areas for further research, in particular with regard to linkages and synergies between different aspects of Decent Work Contribute to discussions relevant to Decent Work in sub-regional, regional and global forums Provide a general reference for reliable country-level analysis These possible uses are mutually supportive and in many countries the DWCPAs will serve several purposes at the same time as different policy making and planning processes are taking place simultaneously. Providing inputs into Decent Work Country Programmes is a priority objective of the DWCPAs, and the DWCPAs will be structured to serve this purpose in the first place. DW Country Policy Analyses will only be prepared at the request of Constituents and ILO County Offices. It is foreseen, though, that most countries that prepare DWCPs will find that the DWCPAs provide an indispensable basis for indentifying priorities and developing interventions to address them. In such countries it is foreseen that the DWCPAs will become an integral part of the DWCP planning and implementation cycle. The Guidebook for preparing DWCPs confirms this function of the DWCPAs3. In line with the above, the intended primary users of the DW Country Policy Analyses are: 3 ILO Decent Work Country Programme; A guidebook, version 3, 2011 DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page 4 Constituents in the country, whose contributions to development of national policy frameworks and plans, including the DWCP, will be enhanced. Country Directors and country office teams, whose ability will be improved to prepare the DWCP, to advocate for and contribute on Decent Work in national policy and plan development, to advocate for the Decent Work Agenda within the UN and with other development partners, and to mobilise resources. Other users will include: 3. DWT Directors and specialists, who will be better able to provide policy and programming advice to Constituents and Country Offices, to contribute to discussions in (sub)regional and global forums, to enhance learning among countries and sectors, and to mobilize resources. Regional Offices who will have substantial comprehensive and continuous input for regional Decent Work policy trends analysis. This will serve to maintain a strong technical foundation at regional level and for forging regional strategic alliances with international development partners and regional forums. HQ Sectors and Program, whose ability will be improved to provide national policy narratives as inputs into the ILO’s technical knowledge base and flagship publications, to better define Outcome strategies, Country Programme Objectives and indicators. The Global Research and Publications and Information and Knowledge Management Gateway assignments, which will be able to draw on the DWCPAs and address gaps in the ILO’s knowledge of linkages and synergies between different aspects of Decent Work. The International Labour Conference and Governing Body, who will be able to draw on the DWCPAs for policy discussions and background documents. The ILO as a whole, to maintain and strengthen its global leadership on policy and advocacy for the Decent Work Agenda. Civil Society organisations, researchers and the general public whose ability will be enhanced to understand Decent Work issues at the national and other levels, and to contribute to relevant discussions. The Decent Work Country Policy Analyses What will they be like? To serve these uses and users, a DW Country Policy Analysis will present an analysis of the national Decent Work situation, challenges and policies and provide policy option for addressing priority issues. The methodology will provide a common template for an analysis that will be structured to reflect the four pillars of the Decent Work Agenda, the cross-cutting theme of gender, and the interrelationships between them. The template will define a minimum standard for what the ILO should be able to say about a country and a menu of additional options that may be relevant to some but not necessarily all countries. It will provide sufficient flexibility to be pertinent to a specific country and its situation, and provide scope for more in-depth consideration of priority concerns, while ensuring that a limited number of core topics is covered for all. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page 1. Part I will describe the evolution of main, sex-disaggregated Decent Work Indicators and other basic economic and social indicators in the country. It will present the Decent Work trends, the Decent Work achievements and deficits. It will present the “story” on the availability of and access to productive employment, social protection, social dialogue and 5 Each DWCPA will have three parts: rights. It will identify the main factors and causes behind the achievements and deficits and it will identify the main challenges ahead. This part will have no more than 5 pages. 2. Part II will – with reference to the main challenges identified in Part I – comprise a concise assessment of policies, programmes and institutions from the perspective of Decent Work. It will consider these in relation to equal access to and inclusion for all women and men to productive employment, social protection, social dialogue and international labour rights. It will also assess the extent to which policies, programmes and institutions are integrated, coherent and working towards the overall objective of providing Decent Work for all Women and Men, especially for vulnerable groups. This part will have no more than 10-15 pages. 3. Part III will contain gender-responsive suggestions on policy options to further promote Decent Work for all women and men. This part will be strategic and forward looking. It will provide an overall vision for coherent and integrated promotion of the Decent Work Agenda. This part will have no more than 5 pages. The DWCPAs will be succinct and easy to understand and use. While considerable review and analysis of available date will be needed for their preparation, the DWCPAs will not be overburdened with all this information but rather refer to it. What technical inputs will they draw on? Page 1. Review of the country’s policies and targets related to economic and social development. 2. Existing reports, analysis and studies relevant to the four pillars of the Decent Work Agenda including by ILO and other UN Agencies, International Finance Institutions, International Development Agencies, INGOs, NGOs, national academia or other national institutions. The inventory will also build on the country policy descriptions available through the Information and Knowledge Management Gateway (Assignment 3). 3. Available statistics, disaggregated by sex, on Decent Work issues, including those available in the Gateway and from Decent Work Country Profiles where applicable. Where quantitative data are not available, qualitative information will be relied on. 4. Summary of the available information on ILO outputs in the country and outcomes that can at least partly be attributed to the ILO. Where DW Country Programme Reviews have been conducted, these will form the basis for this input summary. 5. Summary of UN and other key international development partners outputs in the country and outcomes that can be at least partly attributed to these. This summary will be structured around the main Decent Work policies. 6. A standardized checklist on the key policy areas relevant to promoting Decent Work that covers all four pillars of the Decent Work Agenda and gender equality as a cross-cutting theme. This will build, among other things, on the experience with the Global Jobs Pact checklist. To the extent possible use will be made of information available from the Gateway. 6 The DW Country Policy Analyses will build on key inputs from the existing knowledge base in each country generated by the ILO, the government, social partners, local academia and research as well as other international organizations. Concretely, as Diagram 1 suggests, they will be based on desk reviews of the following inputs: DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 For each these inputs a generic template will be available for amassing and presenting the information. This will include dummy tables and graphs for the statistics to be collected. What will be the process for their development? There is no need for each DWCPA to be developed in precisely the same way and the assignment will pilot various delivery modalities to be able to make experience-based recommendations on what worked best. Based on what has been learned from other country level studies, the following, however, are considered essential elements in the process: Page 7 1. A continuous tripartite consultation process – with a target that at least one third of the participants are women. In-country tripartite consultations will take place: o Prior to the DW Country Policy Analysis to ensure it is supported by the Constituents; addresses the needs of the Constituents; ensure their guidance and inputs to the benefit of the DWCPAs; ensure that the perspectives and needs of both women and men are reflected. o During the process to enable Constituents to understand the analysis and how conclusions and policy options were arrived at. o For final consultations on the draft DWCPA before it is published. 2. The DW Country Policy Analysis will be requested by the Country Office when the Constituents support this. This will ensure country-level ownership and increase the likelihood that the DWCPAs will actually be used. 3. The key technical inputs will be compiled by the Country Office or by a national partner (consultants) coordinated by the Country Office. 4. The technical analysis and the drafting of the DWCPA narrative will primarily be the responsibility of the DWT. 5. Headquarters expertise will be drawn on when the Country Office and the DWT find this is necessary to address gaps in knowledge and expertise. 6. The desk-review will be a reiterative process between information collection and assessment. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Diagram 1 – Decent Work Country Policy Analysis process Key Inputs 4. DWCPA Users/uses Implementation strategy This Chapter will consider what has to be put in place in order to develop a service of the ILO that produces DW Country Policy Analyses, and how the assignment intends to achieve this. It will also consider potential risks for the assignment’s success, that it may be able to address (at least in part), or that it may have to depend on other parts of the ILO for. Vision and strategic framework A sustainable, relevant, demand-driven country policy analysis service primarily for the use of the ILO’s Constituents and Country Offices. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page 8 Diagram 2 presents the vision that provides the rationale for the assignment and the strategic framework for achieving it. The ILO’s and Assignment 2’s final goal is Decent Work for all women and men. In order to achieve this, it is the ILO’s conviction, based on its experience and research, that countries need more effective Decent Work policies. The change in the ILO that will contribute to this, and which is the objective Assignment 2 has to work towards is: In order to achieve this, the assignment will have to produce a number of results that are preconditions for such a service. Diagram 3 presents the basis for the analysis of these preconditions. Diagram 2 – Vision and strategic framework and vision for the assignment Assignment 2: develop tools, capacity, demand, management support The intervention A sustainable, demand-driven country analysis service to the Constituents and ILO Country Offices The change in the ILO Effective DW policies The change in the member states Decent Work for all women and men The change for women and men A sustainable service entails sustained supply and demand. The sustained effective demand for the country analysis service will have to come from Constituents and Country Offices in the first place, although there will be other users as well (see the previous chapter). Demand pre-supposes recognition of the need for and value of the DWCPAs, and purchasing power, i.e. the users, Country Offices primarily in this case, being able to at least partly pay for the service. Sustained supply requires the tools for and a sustainable capacity to deliver the service. Capacity here refers to: Technical (quality) and physical (quantity) human resources capacity An organizational structure that supports the service, which includes a sense of ownership over the service in the organization Financial resources Page Finally the demand-supply relationship between the providers and users of the service requires an enabling environment within the ILO as well as beyond. The diagram presents some of the necessary critical factors within the ILO in the top of the circle, of which support from the Governing Body and Senior Management is critical to addressing the others. Outside the ILO the progress of the One UN initiative and UNDAF programming, and the extent to which other organizations provide a competing service, are among the main conditions that affect the service and its sustainability. 9 DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Diagram 3 – Preconditions for a sustainable Decent Work country policy analysis service An enabling environment, including GB and Senior Management support, incentives for teamwork, coordinated assignments and other initiatives Demand for country level analysis and advice Template Technical guidelines Process guidelines Supply: Tools and capacity to develop DW Country Policy Analyses Progress of One UN Positioning of the service compared to similar products of other organisations The assignment’s strategy includes interventions to create each of these preconditions for achieving a sustainable DW country policy analysis service. Establishing the service, and delivering it to 12 to 15 countries (of which 3 to 5 will be pilots), constitutes the main deliverable of the assignment in its 2-year lifespan. As will be seen below, the assignment does not consider that the sustainability of the service depends on it only: there are too many factors that are beyond its control that will influence this outcome. By the end of the assignment it therefore expects it will be able to demonstrate the potential for sustainability, which can only be realized if the Governing Body, Senior Management and other units in the ILO do their part. The assignment does, however, consider sustainability its central concern. It aims at the DW Country Policy Analyses becoming a regular part of the way the ILO does business. To that effect, the assignment will integrate sustainability in its approach from the start. While initially it will have to be the main driver of the development of a country analysis service, it will not take an implementation role, and not fully fund the development of the DWCPAs. This would create a temporary artificial situation and would lead to the service failing after the assignment’s completion. Instead, the assignment will move into a facilitation role already after the first few pilots, and work towards a sustainable modality for service delivery over its short lifespan. Supply – tools A standard template for the Country Analyses, that defines the minimum standard for what the ILO should be able to say about a country and a menu of additional options to cater to specific country needs DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page 10 With regard to the supply side of the development and use of the DWCPAs, the assignment will develop three tools that will provide the basis for the service: Technical guidelines that guide data collection and systemic, integrated analysis, are userfriendly and modular (i.e. that offer the same flexibility as the template) Process guidelines that guide the course of developing the DWCPAs, that specify who does what, when, how, and how the Constituents are involved, and that are conducive to quality and efficiency. These tools will be designed in the first instance by the assignment team. To ensure that the tools are of high technical quality as well as practical, the team will draw on technical focal points in the Sectors, the Gender Department and other units, as well as DWT and other field staff. This will also contribute to a sense of ownership within the ILO, which contributes to sustainability. A review by field staff and an independent peer review of a draft developed by the assignment team and focal points will focus in particular on practicality. This will result in a draft that will be piloted in 3 to 5 countries that request the service and that are at a point when the DWCPAs can fulfill their foreseen function (e.g. contribute to the next DWCP). Following evaluation of the pilots the template and guidelines will be finalized. This will include discussion with DWT specialists and other field staff on the findings of the evaluations, including issues of cross-sectoral integration and how this can be achieved in practice. The assignment does not expect significant risks that may threaten development of and piloting the tools. Developing the tools is largely under its own control. Supply – capacity On-the-job (in-service) training of the consultants and Constituents through brief workshops at different points in the process and pairing consultants with ILO specialists – guidelines and material for training will be included in the process guidelines Training for relevant ILO staff especially on aspects of cross-sector integration and technical linkages, in research, analysis, and planning; this and the above training will draw on the evaluation of the pilots once these have been completed Advocating for the allocation, joint work and joint missions of teams rather of individual specialists, and recognition of team work A quality control mechanism that is thorough and efficient, with a focus on cross-sectoral, integrated and systemic analysis DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page 11 With regard to capacity to deliver the service, as explained in the previous chapter it is expected that Country Offices will take the lead in compiling the available data and reports in a systematic manner, while DWTs will take the lead in the analysis, development of policy options and write-up. There is, however, a clear constraint on the physical capacity of Country Offices and DWTs, and both are likely to have to rely on national partners (consultants, research institutes) to a significant degree. Unfortunately the experience of the Global Jobs Pact is that consultants can often not be relied on to provide the required quality and present findings from the Decent Work Agenda’s point of view. Another constraint is that ILO specialists are often not used to working in teams and a narrow technical (sectoral ) focus inhibits the ability to provide an integrated analysis. The role of Constituents in supporting development and using the DWCPAs is limited by insufficient ability to analyse data and understand how conclusions and policy options are arrived at. The assignment will address these concerns by: Use of different delivery modalities and combinations of ILO staff and consultants, to test which are most practicable while leading to quality results Evaluation of the pilots and additional DWCPAs resulting in proposals that outline the most effective delivery modalities and ways in which these need to be supported. With DWT, RO and Country Office Directors, make the case to Senior Management for allocation of more staff to the field. With regard to funds, the assignment has considerable resources to support its interventions, including development of the Country Analyses. However, the assignment fully funding the DWCPAs would detract from its facilitation role, lead to little being learned about the service’s feasibility, and undermine sustainability. As stated earlier, the assignment will therefore work towards sustainability from the start and: Negotiate agreements for each DWCPA with DWTs, Country Offices and other relevant units in the ILO that specify who will contribute what in terms of funds and expertise. DWCPAs will go ahead only if there is willingness to cost-share and this is reflected in these agreements. For longer-term financial sustainability Country Analyses will have to be included in the regular Programme and Budget. The assignment can facilitate this by: Negotiating a role for itself in the Programme and Budget process. Advocating for the allocation of funds with Senior Management. Including the evaluation of the different funding modalities used in the evaluation of the DWCPAs developed under the assignment and the assignment’s final evaluation. Inclusion of the development of Country Analyses in the Programme and Budget will of course also contribute to the sustainable allocation of staff to the DWCPA process. While the assignment can therefore take considerable measures to address the main concerns relating to sustained capacity to develop the DWCPAs, significant risks remain. The most important of these are that: In conclusion, the assignment can lay the groundwork and demonstrate the potential for a sustained capacity to provide a country analysis service, but the outcome is not under its control. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 12 DWTs and Country Offices may have insufficient physical capacity for sustained delivery – the assignment can advocate for more capacity in the field, but allocating staff is beyond its control DWTs have insufficient capacity for cross-sectoral analysis – the assignment can contribute to developing this through its technical guidelines, but identifying and addressing the root causes of this weakness it beyond its own capacity and scope The Programme and Budget for the next Biennium may not make sufficient provision for developing Country Analyses and the Governing Body and Senior Management do not continue their support – while the assignment can demonstrate the usefulness of the DWCPAs and advocate for them, decisions on resource allocation are likely to be influenced by many other factors. Page Demand With regard to developing a sustained demand for the country analysis service, as indicated in Chapter 2 significant demand can be expected from Country Office and Constituents in the context of preparation of DWCPs. However, for this demand to become effective (translate into commitments) and to generate demand for other purposes, the assignment will need to ensure that potential service users are aware of the DWCPAs, that expectations are realistic and compatible, and that the DWCPAs are seen to be useful and to provide good value for money to Country Offices and Constituents. The DWCPAs have to be positioned in a way that clarifies how they relate to other studies that may be viewed as similar. Country Offices also need to have sustained “purchasing power” to continue to use the service. The assignment will therefore: Develop and implement a communication strategy that addresses the primary users (Country Offices and Constituents) of the service directly, with a message that conveys what the DWCPAs can and cannot provide, why they are important, and that clarifies how they will be different from and build on other initiatives Make an assessment, on the basis of planning processes foreseen, of which countries could benefit most from the DWCPAs and approach them on a one-to-one basis Have consultations with Constituents to ensure that the DWCPAs address their needs and priorities Ensure that it can demonstrate value for money on the basis of the pilots, as well as further DWCPAs that will be developed Promote inclusion of the development of Country Analyses in DWCPs and Country Office budgets generally, and plan DWCPAs beyond the assignment period These interventions address the main needs in relation to creating sustained demand for the DWCPAs. The single remaining risk that is largely beyond the control of the assignment is the availability and allocation of funds, which will be influenced by many factors other than how useful and well-known the DWCPAs are. While the assignment will be able to demonstrate demand, the extent to which this will be effective demand cannot be guaranteed. An enabling environment The DWCPAs offer value of money and are being used for influencing the development of policies for Decent Work There are important synergies between the DWCPAs and other research, services, in the ILO DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page 13 It is beyond the scope of the assignment to create a broader enabling organizational environment, including an organizational culture, that supports the development of the DWCPAs. In the first place, it is not part of its mandate, and in the second place it is not feasible for the assignment to change ways of working in the ILO by itself. The value accorded to collaboration and teamwork, linking the work of the Sectors analytically as well as operationally, and programming on the basis of needs assessment are perhaps the most important areas where change is generally considered necessary. Since it is within the purview of the Governing Body and Senior Management to actively promote such change, what the assignment is able to do is advocating for it at this level. The assignment will also work with the Governing Body and Senior Management to ensure the sustainability of the service, by demonstrating that: There is demand for the service It is feasible to deliver the service if the assignment’s proposals for allocation of staff, funds and an organizational structure are implemented. These messages and a strategy to convey them will be included in the communication strategy that will be developed to stimulate demand (see above). Finally, within the ILO, there is a strong need to coordinate among the three Information and Knowledge Management Assignments and the different ways Decent Work is assessed at the country level (e.g. with the Decent Work Country Profiles). One obvious way in which the assignment can (and will) contribute to the Global Research and Publications assignment is by indicating further areas of research, especially with regard to linkages and synergies between different aspects of Decent Work. While the assignment will be an eager partner in such coordination and can advocate for it towards Senior Management, this is again largely beyond its control. It will include these messages in its communication strategy while at the same time making use of concrete opportunities for collaboration if these are also recognized by potential partners. With regard to the environment outside the ILO, the main concern the assignment can address is the positioning of the DWCPAs in relation to non-ILO studies on employment and other aspects of Decent Work. These include reports of the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the UK Department for International Development, the UN Development Programme and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The assignment will address this by: Grounding the DWCPAs firmly in the 2008 Social Justice Declaration and the Decent Work Agenda Promoting the DWCPAs as such internationally, through the Department for Communication Working with Country Offices, Constituents and DECOM to promote the DWCPAs as such at the country level The main risk is that more pressing concerns than institutionalizing DW Country Analyses, such as the continuing economic and job crisis, will take over the Governing Body’s and Senior Management’s agenda and reduce the level of priority it is given. Since the strategic vision that forms the basis for this assignment is central to the ILO’s operations, and that the assignment expects to be able to demonstrate the value of the service, this is not a high risk. Country Analyses Promoting the service to Country Offices that are in a good position to make use of the DWCPAs Planning delivery Negotiating agreements with Country Offices, DWTs, ROs and HQ that specify who will do and pay for what Implementation including on-the-job training for national partners and Constituents Quality control and finalizing and publishing the DWCPAs DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page 14 The assignment is expected to facilitate the development of 12 to 15 DW Country Policy Analyses in total, including 3 to 5 pilots. This will be done following the approach already outlined above, i.e.: Promoting the DWCPAs to potential users The main risk that can be foreseen is that the total number of DWCPAs to be produced is high for the little time available, especially considering that the DWCPAs are a new service, and will be produced on demand and when they can play a useful role only. Similar initiatives (e.g. the Global Jobs Pact) have not been able to deliver this many studies over such a short period of time. It is likely that fewer DWCPAs will be developed, or that the time period will have to be extended. Diagram 4 below summarises the assignment’s main interventions towards developing a sustainable service that will provide Country Offices and Constituents with relevant and easy to use DW Country Policy Analyses at times that they can make good use of them for programme formulation and policy making. The main risk to the delivery and the sustainability of the service remains insufficient human resources and financial capacity. It is for the Governing Body and Senior Management to consider how to address this. Diagram 4 – Main interventions DEMAND Promote Demonstrate value for money Plan beyond Assignment Develop and test tools Resource allocation agreements Training Plan beyond Assignment SUPPLY Advocate for GB and Senior Management support and coordination – inclusion in next Programme and Budget Position the DW Country Policy Analyses to reflect the 2008 Declaration 5. Reporting and evaluation DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Page As stated in the DG’s minute of 30.8.2011, the leader of the assignment will report to a Kn owledge Management Steering Committee, chaired by the Director of PROGRAM, which will itself report to the Senior Management Team. This assignment will also prepare informal regular one-page updates on progress and plans. 15 Reporting Evaluation Page 16 The assignment plans a final evaluation that will also look forward to measures to be taken for improving the service and making it fully sustainable, i.e. part of the way the ILO does business. This will feed into a proposal to the Governing Body and Senior Management on organizational structures and delivery modalities for the continued provision of the service. It may also lead to further improvement of the tools the assignment has produced. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 6. Logical framework – key elements The assignment’s Goal – what the ILO finally wants to achieve with the assignment The assignment aims to contribute to the ILO’s goal of Decent Work for all women and men. The assignment’s Purpose – what the ILO wants to achieve as an intermediate step to this goal Effective policies for Decent Work that reflect the 2008 Declaration Indicators and targets It is not within the scope of the assignment to assess impact on this level It is not within the scope of the assignment to assess impact on this level Milestones Assumptions and main risks On the basis of ILO and other research and statements it is assumed that better policies for Decent Work contribute to more sustainable development, which contributes to Decent Work. This is plausible. Page 17 Risks include the possibility that the formulated policies are not in line with the needs of specific countries or with best practice or not enough is known about best practice; the non-implementation of formulated policies; and external economic, social and environmental factors. These are all considered medium to high level risks. The assignment cannot influence them. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Indicators and targets The assignment’s objective – what it will achieve in the ILO A relevant, demand-driven Decent Work country analysis service for the Constituents and ILO Country Offices that is potentially sustainable Milestones It will be possible to assess the extent to which this objective has been fully realised after the assignment has been completed and sufficient time has passed to test follow-up arrangements. It is therefore proposed that the ILO assesses by the end of 2014: Assumptions and main risks It is assumed that an ILO service that develops Country Analyses on request will enable Constituents and Country Offices to do evidence-based advocacy and develop national policies for DW. This is plausible. Number of DW Country Policy Analyses produced in 2014 Total: at least 5 Number of DW Country Policy Analyses planned and resourced for the following two years Total: at least 10 A medium level risk is that Constituents and Offices do not have sufficient capacity to translate the findings and analysis the DWCPAs provide into action at the policy level. This will require capacity building especially of Constituents. This is not part of the assignment and is the mandate of ACTRAV and ACTEMP. A further risk is the possibility that ACTRAV and/or ACTEMP are unable to provide the required capacity building on time (medium level). The assignment will mitigate this through coordination with both. A further risk is that Constituents are not well-placed to influence national policies, or that consultation mechanisms are inadequate. This is also a medium level risk, which cannot be mitigated by the assignment. Page 18 Results – what the assignment will produce to make this happen in the ILO DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Indicators and targets Number of pilot tests Total: 3 to 5 by end 2013 Number of evaluations of pilots Total: 3 to 5 by March 2013 Users and providers of services provide a positive assessment of the tools On a scale of 1 to 5, service users and providers rank the tools at 4 or 5 on characteristics specified in the result statement Final versions of the template and guidelines approved for printing Total: 3 tools By end-2013 Assumptions and main risks It is assumed that the tools will contribute to the ILO’s ability to provide a sustainable, relevant and demand-driven service. This is plausible. There is a medium level risk that the tools will overshoot their target by being too comprehensive or academic. The potential scope and depth of the DWCPAs is enormous. The assignment will address this through peer-reviews, country level evaluations and consultations with users and practitioners. This should reduce the risk to a low level. There are also the risks of low demand, inadequate capacity and inadequate management support, which will be addressed under other results. Page 19 Result 1 Proven tools that form the basis for a Decent Work country policy analysis service: A standard template for DW Country Policy Analyses that defines the minimum the ILO should be able to say about a country and a menu of additional options, is easy to understand and provides flexibility for adaptation to country needs Technical guidelines that guide data collection and systemic analysis, are user-friendly and modular Process guidelines that guide the course of developing the DWCPAs, specify who does what, when, how, and how the Constituents are involved, and are conducive to quality and efficiency Milestones DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Indicators and target Result 2 Sustained capacity to deliver the Decent Work country policy analysis service, including technical competence and physical human resources, organisational and partner capacity, financial resources Milestones Users and service providers agree the Country Analyses were adequately resourced in terms of technical and physical capacity, organisational and partner capacity, financial resources On a scale of 1 to 5, service users and providers rank the capacity to provide the service at 4 or 5 on characteristics specified in the result statement Percent of DW Country Analyses delivered as planned Total: 75% By end 2012: 75% By mid-2013: 75% Number of Decent Work Country Policy Analyses planned for the next Biennium to which DWTs, ROs and HQ have made firm commitments Total for the next Biennium: at least 12 By mid-2013: at least 10 Assumptions and main risks It is assumed that a sustained capacity will contribute to the ILO’s ability to provide a sustainable, relevant and demand-driven service. This is plausible. A number of medium to high-level risks can be identified. Neither DWTs nor Country Offices may have sufficient physical capacity to deliver the service (high). DWTs have also limited technical capacity in cross-sectoral analysis (medium). Much will have to be done through national partners, who will not always have the technical capacity (medium). While the assignment has funds to cost-share the delivery of the service, sustained capacity beyond the assignment will require Regular Budget allocations (medium). Page 20 The assignment can address the lack of capacity of national partners, but the other risks are to a significant extent beyond its control. The assignment will therefore only be able to demonstrate that the service has potential to be sustainable. Full sustainability cannot be delivered by the assignment alone. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Indicators and targets Milestones Result 3 Sustained effective demand for the Decent Work country policy analysis service from Constituents and Country Offices as well as broader user groups Number of DW Country Policy Analyses produced in the current biennium Total: at least 12 By mid-2013: at least 6 Number of DW Country Policy Analyses planned and for the next Biennium to which Country Offices and Constituents have made firm commitments Total for next Biennium: at least 12 By mid-2013: at least 10 Result 4 Active support for the Decent Work country policy analysis service from the Governing Body, Senior Management Number of official communications from the GB and Senior Management that support the development and continuation of the service Total: 5 By end-2012: 1 By mid-2012: 3 (cumulative) The need for DW Country Policy Analyses recognised in the guidelines for the P&B process One statement in the guidelines, when they are published Assumptions and main risks It is assumed that demand from Constituents and Country Offices will contribute to the ILO’s ability to provide a sustainable, relevant and demand-driven service. This is plausible. Medium level risks are that the demand is not realised due to unawareness of the service, perceived overlap with other products and what may be considered a history of similar but unsustained initiatives. The assignment will mitigate these by ensuring the costeffectiveness, relevance and quality of the service, positioning the service well, and by developing an effective communication strategy. This will reduce the risk to a low level. The medium level risk of unrealistic expectations will be addressed likewise. It is assumed that active support from the GB and Senior Management will contribute to the ILO’s ability to provide a sustainable, relevant and demand-driven service. This is plausible. It is also assumed that such support is necessary for a sustained service delivery capacity, development of the tools, and for sustained demand. Page 21 There is a medium-level risk that other more urgent priorities will take over the agenda of the Governing Body and Senior Management. The assignment will address this by demonstrating the Country Analyses value, including in relation to the pressing issues of the day. This risk will be mitigated to low level. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Result 5 Decent Work Country Policy Analyses for use of Country Offices, Constituents, and broader user groups Indicators and targets Number of DW Country Policy Analyses available Milestones Total: at least 12 By mid-2013: at least 6 Assumptions and main risks It is assumed that the development of actual DWCPAs will contribute to development of the service by demonstrating its feasibility and value (including value for money). It is assumed that this will be partly done by achieving impact on DWCPs and DW policies. This is plausible. Page 22 As already pointed out at the objective level, there is, however, a medium level risk is that Constituents and Offices do not have sufficient capacity to translate the findings and analysis in the DWCPAs into action at the policy level. This may affect the extent to which the services’ value can be demonstrated. Capacity-related risks are also medium level, and little time is available to address these and at the same time to develop demand for a new service. There is therefore a significant risk that the target will not be reached. DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 7. Logical framework – intervention plan Interventions: what the assignment will do to produce these results For Result 1 Proven tools that form the basis for a Decent Work country policy analysis service 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Q2 2012 Q3 Q4 Page 23 1.8 Recruit a capable management and technical support team Set up and use a structure of focal points and experts across the house to provide technical inputs Draft first versions of the tools Use focal points, external peer review, consultations with field staff to define minimum requirements and menu of options and re-draft the tools – include a meeting in Turin Pilot test the tools in 3 to 5 countries Include evaluation of the tools in evaluation of the country pilots through users and providers of the service, including national partners Have consultations with specialists and other staff on the findings of the evaluations and the implications for the tools, in particular with regard to cross-sectoral linkages and synergies. Reflect the findings in the final draft of the tools. Q1 XX DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Q1 Q2 2013 Q3 Q4 For Result 2 Sustained capacity to deliver the Decent Work country policy analysis service, including technical competence and physical human resources capacity, organizational and partner capacity, financial resources 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 Ensure allocation of funds and staff to development of the DWCPAs in the current Biennium by negotiating agreements with DWTs, ROs, HQ Build capacity of ILO staff in particular in the area of integrated, cross-sectoral research, analysis and planning Build capacity of national partners by pairing them with ILO specialists and start-up and other in-service workshops (include training approach and materials in the process guidelines) Build capacity of Constituents to interpret data and findings by integrating training in the DW country policy analysis process (include training approach and materials in the process guidelines) Explore and develop various modalities of internal and external cost-sharing and funding, and service delivery Include evaluation of delivery and funding modalities in evaluation of the country pilots and the assignment’s final evaluation Develop proposals to Senior Management on an organisational structure, process for delivery and funding strategy for the service – including assignment of more staff to Country Offices and DWTs if this is indicated Negotiate a role for the assignment and its follow-up organisational structure in the Programme and Budget process and advocate for the allocation of funds to delivery of the service Promote allocation of staff and funds for development of DWCPAs in workplans for the current and next Biennium Plan for the delivery of the service in the next Biennium and ensure allocation of funds and staff to development of future DWCPAs by negotiating agreements with DWTs, ROs, HQ Advocate with Senior Management for effective coordination with the Gateway and Research and Publications assignments as well as with relevant other ILO products Inform Gateway about information/policy needs for inclusion in its database and source statistical and legal information from the Gateway DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 2012 Q3 Q4 24 2.1 Q2 Page Q1 Q1 Q2 2013 Q3 Q4 Q1 2.13 Q2 2012 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2013 Q3 Q4 Inform Research and Publications about key findings, especially on cross-sectoral linkages, and what knowledge gaps still exist For Result 3 Sustained demand for the Decent Work country policy analysis service, from Constituents and Country Offices, as well as broader user groups 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Take stock of other ILO and external products and define the DWCPAs as a unique service grounded in all aspects of the 2008 Declaration and the Decent Work Agenda Take a participatory approach, share, ensure openness and accountability, to develop across-the-house ownership and an expectation that the DWCPAs will become part of the way the ILO does business Define what the DWCPAs can and cannot be expected to provide to address unrealistic and contradictory expectations Based on the pilots, set a minimum and maximum price for the service – revise if necessary based on further experience Include value for money in the evaluation of the pilots and the assignment’s final evaluation Develop a communication strategy that includes messages based on the outcome of 31 to 3.5 and that addresses different target groups and their concerns directly, using various media and forums – include Constituents to raise their awareness of the importance of DWCPAs, and external audiences to position the DWCPAs vis-à-vis country reviews and reports of other organizations Implement the communication strategy and keep developing it on the basis of feedback and more material (evaluations) becoming available Make use of the existing field structure for Country Offices and Constituents to channel their demand for the service Ensure that the prime users of the DWCPAs, Country Offices and Constituents, allocate funds and staff to support development of the DWCPAs in the current Biennium by including their contributions in negotiated agreements with DWTs, ROs, HQ DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 2012 Q3 Q4 25 3.1 Q2 Page Q1 Q1 Q2 2013 Q3 Q4 Q1 3.10 3.11 Q2 2012 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2013 Q3 Q4 Q2 2013 Q3 Q4 Advocate in the Programme and Budget process for the allocation of funds at the country level to ensure Country Offices have a minimum level of purchasing power for the service Plan for the delivery of the service in the next Biennium to countries that have expressed demand, and ensure that the prime users of the DWCPAs, Country Offices and Constituents, allocate funds and staff to support development of the DWCPAs in next Biennium by including their contributions in negotiated agreements with DWTs, ROs, HQ. For Result 4 Sustained active support for the Decent Work country policy analysis service from the Governing Body and Senior Management Q1 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 2012 Q3 Q4 Demonstrate value for money by including this in evaluations (see also 3.5) Demonstrate in-house mutual benefits – include savings in staff time and funds, technical synergies, quality gains in terms of the 2008 Declaration in the final evaluation, use of DWCPAs by Gateway and Research and Publications assignments Demonstrate gains due to South-South exchanges, partnerships with regional networks and organisations – include in final evaluation Demonstrate demand by preparing a demand-based plan for delivery of the service in the next biennium, including commitments made by providers and users Demonstrate feasibility of delivery of the service through proposals on an organisational structure, process for delivery and funding strategy for the service Define what the DWCPAs can and cannot be expected to provide Include messages based on the above in the assignment’s communication strategy, and specifically target the Governing Body and Senior Management (see also 3.6, 3.7) Page 26 4.6 4.7 Q2 DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Q1 For Result 5 Decent Work Country Policy Analyses for use of Country Offices, Constituents, and broader user groups Q1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 2012 Q3 Q4 Promote the service to Country Offices that are in a good position to make use of the DWCPAs – generate effective demand with interventions included under Result 3 Select countries on the basis of standard criteria relating to the extent to which they will be able to make effective use of the DWCPAs, the commitments Country Offices and Constituents are willing to make, and availability of willingness and capacity to provide the service Negotiate agreements with Country Offices, DWTs, ROs and HQ that specify who will do and pay for what (see also 2.1, 3.9). Have consultations with Country Offices and Constituents to establish their needs and priorities for the DWCPAs Develop and periodically update a delivery plan for the service Develop financial and human resources capacity by interventions included under Result 2 Implement the country analyses Ensure quality control, finalisation and publication of the DWCPAs Work with Country Offices, Constituents and DECOM to promote the DWCPAs to broader user groups, including at (sub)regional and global levels Coordinate with ACTRAV and ACTEMP to facilitate the development of the Constituents’ capacity to use the DWCPAs to influence or develop programmes and policies Page 27 5.10 Q2 DW Country Policy Analysis Strategy, draft, 27.08.12 Q1 Q2 2013 Q3 Q4