Planning and Environment Act 1987
MACEDON RANGES PLANNING SCHEME
AMENDMENT C100
EXPLANATORY REPORT
Who is the planning authority?
This amendment has been prepared by the Macedon Ranges Shire Council, which is the planning
authority for this amendment.
The Amendment has been made at the request of Macedon Ranges Shire Council.
Land affected by the Amendment
The Amendment applies to land in and close to the township of Riddells Creek, as shown on the
attached map (Attachment A).
What the amendment does
The Amendment implements key aspects of the Riddells Creek Structure Plan 2013 (Structure Plan)
by amending the Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS), rezoning land, applying overlays, introducing
a new residential zone and introducing/amending schedules to the residential zones.
The Amendment proposes to:
 Replace the existing MSS Clause 21.13-5 (Riddells Creek local policy) with an updated clause
and introduce the Riddells Creek Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles as a reference
document.
 Rezone land bounded by Sutherlands Road, Lions Club Park, Riddells Creek Primary School and
Riddells Creek Recreation Reserve from Commercial 2 (C2Z) to Special Use Zone Schedule 5
(SUZ5).
 Rezone land in the Kilmore Road, Amess Road, Frost Lane and Wohl Court area from Rural
Living 1 (RLZ1) to Urban Growth (UGZ).
 Rezone land in an area south of the railway line, east of Riddell Road and west of Stokes Lane
West from Rural Living 1 (RLZ1) to Urban Growth (UGZ).
 Apply the Design and Development Overlay Schedule 24 (DDO24) to all land in the Commercial
1 Zone (C1Z) and some adjoining land in the Public Use and Public Park and Recreation Zones
in the town centre.
 Apply the Environmental Significance Overlay Schedule 7 (ESO7) to a buffer around the Riddells
Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
 Introduce Schedules 3 and 4 to Clause 32.08 General Residential Zone (GRZ3 & GRZ4) and
apply these zones to existing GRZ1 areas identified for moderate infill development.
 Introduce Clause 32.09 Neighbourhood Residential Zone and one (1) schedule (NRZ7) and apply
this zone to existing GRZ1 areas envisaged for limited growth.
 Amend Schedule 1 to Clause 32.03 Low Density Residential Zone (LDRZ) to increase the
minimum subdivision area for all LDRZ land northwest of Main Road to 20,000m² (2 hectares).
 Amend the Schedule to Clause 66.04 to list the operator of the wastewater treatment plant as a
Determining Referral Authority.
Page 1 of 31
The key changes include:
 Setting a clear township boundary and identifying two priority growth areas.
 Implementing strategies for achieving the preferred future character of residential areas, as
described in the Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles, by:
o Formulating objectives and strategies for each of the six neighbourhood character precincts
(as identified in the map at Attachment B).
o Rezoning the Rural Bushland Precincts A, B and C from General Residential Zone to
Neighbourhood Residential Zone Schedule 7, which specifies a minimum lot size of
4,000m2 as well as design and siting parameters to achieve the preferred future character
for the precinct.
o Rezoning the Town Centre Neighbourhood Character Precinct from General Residential
Zone Schedule 1 to General Residential Zone Schedule 3, which specifies a building height
limit of 8 metres as well as design and siting parameters to achieve the preferred future
character for the precinct.
o Rezoning the Garden Setting and Modern Residential Precincts from General Residential
Zone Schedule 1 to General Residential Zone Schedule 4, which specifies a building height
limit of 8 metres as well as design and siting parameters to achieve the preferred future
character for the precinct.
 Rezoning of land close to the town centre from Commercial 2 Zone to Special Use Zone
Schedule 5 to facilitate development of a health, education and community precinct. This will
meet expected demand for provision of such facilities to meet population growth, as identified in
the Structure Plan, in an appropriate area where there is little identified demand for Commercial 2
uses. Applying the SUZ enables the tailoring of a specific schedule to achieve objectives that
cannot be met under other zones.
 Rezoning of 241 hectares of land from Rural Living Zone to Urban Growth Zone (UGZ) to ensure
the availability of land for the considerable residential growth envisaged for the township. The
UGZ requirement for precinct structure planning will facilitate orderly development and the
provision of necessary infrastructure in the two areas included for rezoning. The UGZ enables
staged release of the 57 hectares required to meet projected demand until 2036, as well as
safeguarding land and providing clear direction for long term growth of the urban area of the
township. Both areas were identified as priority development areas when the Structure Plan was
adopted by Council.
 Applying the Design and Development Overlay to commercial properties in the town centre to
guide the built form outcome of development in a way that respects and contributes to the
character of Riddells Creek’s town centre.
 Applying the Environmental Significance Overlay to the Riddells Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant on Websters Road to protect its continued operation and expansion from encroachment by
sensitive uses. A buffer zone of 920m was determined by Western Water in accordance with EPA
guidelines. The buffer zone applies to properties within the Farming and Rural Living Zones and
some properties on Sutherlands Road and Amess Road in the Low Density Residential Zone.
 Amend Schedule 1 to the Low Density Residential Zone land northwest of Main Road in order to
reduce exposure to bushfire risk by limiting development in this area. This schedule increases the
minimum subdivision area to 2 hectares.
An explanation of how the amendment proposes to implement the Riddells Creek Structure Plan is
provided in the Implementation Report at Attachment C.
Note: This amendment is drafted to be consistent with the updated MSS proposed for inclusion in the
Macedon Ranges Planning Scheme via Amendment C84. The numbering of proposed clauses in this
Page 2 of 31
Explanatory Report and in the amendment ordinances (e.g. Clause 21.13-5) assumes that
Amendment C84 will be introduced into the Macedon Ranges Planning Scheme prior to the finalisation
of this amendment.
Strategic assessment of the Amendment
Why is the Amendment required?
This amendment is required to implement the key strategic directions of the Structure Plan into the
Macedon Ranges Planning Scheme. This will provide statutory weight in the consideration of
rezoning requests and planning permit applications, and ensure that the planning scheme aligns
with current best practice and community expectations.
How does the Amendment implement the objectives of planning in Victoria?
The amendment implements the objectives of planning in Victoria (Section 4 of the Planning and
Environment Act 1987) by implementing the Riddells Creek Structure Plan 2013, which considered:
 Land use directions to provide for the fair, orderly, economical and sustainable use and
development of land. These included opportunities for residential growth and a broader range of
housing choices, as well as meeting needs for commercial growth and facilities for health,
education and community activities.
 The environmental risks presented by the township’s exposure to bushfire and flood hazards, and
applying planning policy and controls to mitigate these risks.
 Conserving and enhancing those buildings, areas or other places which are of scientific,
aesthetic, architectural or historical interest, or otherwise of special cultural value, including
applying planning controls to retain and enhance the scale and character of the town’s built form.
 Protecting public utilities and other assets, including applying planning controls to safeguard the
operation and future expansion of the Riddells Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
How does the Amendment address any environmental, social and economic effects?
Environmental:
The amendment will have a number of positive environmental effects. It encourages sustainable
urban growth by consolidating development within the existing township boundary, thereby reducing
the potential environmental impact of development within the proclaimed potable water catchment
surrounding the town.
Use of the UGZ in new growth areas will require environmental issues to be carefully considered in
the development of Precinct Structure Plans.
The new residential zones and schedules are implemented in a manner that addresses the
respective residential areas and their associated neighbourhood and environmental character.
Protecting the ongoing operation of the Riddells Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant will maintain
public health.
Social:
Positive social benefits will result from the Amendment through the application of the Special Use
Zone to facilitate medical, educational and community uses in a precinct close to the town centre.
The value placed by the community on the ‘village feel’ of the township is recognised through the
protection of valued aspects of neighbourhood character in residential areas and the application of
the Design and Development Overlay to guide the scale and location of development in the
commercial centre.
Page 3 of 31
Policy support for a greater diversity of housing types close to the town centre will also contribute to
improved alignment between supply and demand in the context of changing social demographics,
including an ageing population.
Economic:
The amendment will have positive economic effects through the consolidation of the commercial
centre of the town and the industrial area and policy support for development in these areas that will
provide for local community needs and increase local employment opportunities.
The residential growth that is facilitated by the Amendment will also stimulate economic activity
through the building sector and population-driven local demand for goods and services.
Does the Amendment address relevant bushfire risk?
The amendment will not result in any increase to the risk of life, property, community infrastructure
or the natural environment from bushfire.
The amendment supports urban development through a combination of infill within the existing
township and growth to the east and south, while restricting further development in the north and
northwest of the town. This directs development away from areas of greatest bushfire risk.
Does the Amendment comply with the requirements of any Minister’s Direction
applicable to the amendment?
The amendment is consistent with the Ministerial Direction on the Form and Content of Planning
Schemes under section 7(5) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
It should be noted that this amendment is drafted to be consistent with the updated MSS proposed for
inclusion in the Macedon Ranges Planning Scheme via Amendment C84. The numbering of proposed
MSS clauses (e.g. Clause 21.13-2) assumes that Amendment C84 will be introduced into the
Macedon Ranges Planning Scheme prior to the finalisation of this amendment.
An evaluation of the amendment has also been undertaken in accordance with the strategic
considerations set out in Ministerial Direction No. 11 Strategic Assessment of Amendments, and the
amendment is consistent with these considerations.
How does the Amendment support or implement the State Planning Policy
Framework and any adopted State policy?
The State Government’s adopted Loddon Mallee South Regional Growth Plan envisages that
Riddells Creek could grow to just over 6000 residents by 2041, catered for by both greenfield
housing and infill development. The amendment supports the Growth Plan by rezoning land for
greenfield growth and identifying areas for infill development, while introducing controls to retain
township and local neighbourhood character.
The amendment supports and implements the State Planning Policy Framework as follows:
 It encourages the development of a settlement that optimises the use of existing infrastructure,
reflecting and respecting the development constraints within the Shire. The amendment will also
assist council in responding to the needs of the existing and future communities through provision
of appropriately zoned residential, commercial and industrial land within a clear settlement
boundary that will ensure growth is planned and environmental values protected (Clause 11
Settlement).
 It provides for the protection of Riddells Creek’s significant landscape values that contribute to its
character, identity and sustainable environments (Clause 12 Environmental and landscape
values).
 It directs growth and development away from areas subject to high risk of bushfire and flooding
(Clause 13 Environmental Risks).
Page 4 of 31
 It directs growth and development away from areas of high value agricultural land and protects
key landscapes and environments from inappropriate development and misuse (Clause 14
Natural Resources Management).
 It will ensure that all new residential and commercial development appropriately responds to its
landscape and neighbourhood character (Clause 15 Built Environment and Heritage).
 It emphasises the need to provide opportunities for housing development through consolidation of
existing residential areas and increased housing diversity and density in appropriate areas
(Clause 16 Housing).
 It supports development in the town’s commercial centre, while protecting it from out-of-centre
commercial development (Clause 17 Economic Development).
 It directs increased housing diversity and density to areas close to the town centre that are well
serviced by public transport (Clause 18 Transport).
How does the Amendment support or implement the Local Planning Policy
Framework, and specifically the Municipal Strategic Statement?
The amendment supports the following Clauses of the LPPF and MSS:
 Clause 21.03 (Municipal Vision and Strategic Framework Plan): by supporting development that
complements the nature and character of the rural landscapes of the Shire, and by providing a
diverse range of residential and commercial opportunities in appropriate locations to meet the
needs of the Shire’s changing demographics.
 Clause 21.04 (Settlement): by facilitating residential growth in Riddells Creek in accordance with
the Macedon Ranges Settlement Strategy 2011, which recognises the town’s attributes such as
its attractive lifestyle opportunities, location on the railway line and proximity to larger centres of
employment including metropolitan Melbourne. The Settlement Strategy envisages that Riddells
Creek will grow to a population of about 6,000 by 2036, with a functional role as a District Town.
 Clause 21.05 (Environment and Landscape Values): by providing policy to ensure development
within view sheds to the town’s backdrop of the Macedon Ranges does not detract from its
significance as a landscape feature.
 Clause 21.06 (Environmental Risks): by directing growth and development away from areas
subject to high risk of bushfire and flooding.
 Clause 21.08 (Built Environment and Heritage): by encouraging development that respects the
distinctive character and defining attributes of Riddells Creek.
 Clause 21.09 (Housing): by encouraging a diversity of housing in appropriate locations in
proximity to the town centre to cater for the changing demographics of the Shire, as well as
facilitating development of new housing in priority growth areas.
 Clause 21.10-1 (Commercial and Industry): by supporting industrial development to meet local
needs and minimise negative impacts of industrial development on adjoining residential amenity,
while encouraging heavier industries to locate in New Gisborne or Kyneton.
 Clause 21.10-3 (Retail and Services): by facilitating improvements to the design and presentation
of the town centre through the application of a Design and Development Overlay, and minimising
out of centre development.
 Clause 21.12-2 (Development Infrastructure): by promoting infill development that maximises the
use of existing infrastructure, as well as the orderly provision of infrastructure in growth areas.
Does the Amendment make proper use of the Victoria Planning Provisions?
The amendment makes proper use of the Victoria Planning Provisions by including strategic intent in
the MSS and using zones and overlays where appropriate, consistent with relevant practice notes.
Page 5 of 31
The language used has been framed in such a way that it can be translated into the proposed
Planning Policy Framework should it be approved.
Neighbourhood Residential Zone
The application of the Neighbourhood Residential Zone to the Rural Bushland Precinct (A, B and C)
is consistent with Practice Note 78 – Applying the Residential Zones.
In particular, the areas proposed for inclusion in the Neighbourhood Residential Zone are consistent
with the following principles listed in the Practice Note:
 Areas with neighbourhood character that is sought be retained – The consistent, spacious, low
density and semi-rural character of the Rural Bushland Precinct is clearly identifiable. These
qualities are proposed to be retained in the precinct’s Preferred Future Character Statement. This
Statement forms part of the Riddells Creek Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles which
build on the neighbourhood character work completed during the structure planning processes.
 Areas where more than 80% of lots currently accommodate detached dwellings – The Rural
Bushland Precincts contains almost exclusively detached dwellings.
 Areas which may not have good supporting transport infrastructure or other infrastructure,
facilities and services and are not likely to be improved in the medium to longer term – The Rural
Bushland Precinct comprises areas on the edge of the township which do not benefit from the
proximity to the town’s shops, community services and transport infrastructure to the same
degree as other parts of the town.
In addition, the Rural Bushland Precincts are subject to high bushfire risk which impacts their
suitability for new housing.
Variations proposed to Clause 54 and 55 (Rescode)
The Neighbourhood and General Residential Zone Schedules proposed include variations to the
default siting and design requirements of Clause 54 and 55 of the Planning Scheme (Rescode).
These variations are based on a detailed assessment of the town’s neighbourhood character
conducted as part of the Riddells Creek Structure Plan and the detailed supplementary work of the
Riddells Creek Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles 2015. The variations aim to retain
important character aspects of the township as a whole (such as consistently low building heights)
as well as the particular characteristics which define the different neighbourhood character precincts
(such as consistent front setbacks, site coverage and single dwelling presentation to the street). An
explanation for the variations proposed is provided at Attachment D of this Explanatory Report.
Urban Growth Zone
The proposed application of the Urban Growth Zone to the two priority development areas identified
in the adopted Structure Plan is consistent with Practice Note 47. The Urban Growth Zone is the
appropriate zone to encourage staged development and co-ordinated infrastructure provision in
accordance with precinct structure plans. By requiring Precinct Structure Plans to be prepared prior
to any development or subdivision, the Urban Growth Zone enables staged release of the 57
hectares required to meet projected demand until 2036 while safeguarding the land from
development that would prejudice the future urban growth proposed.
Special Use Zone
The Special Use Zone is proposed for the Health, Education and Community Facilities Precinct as
none of the standard controls available in the Victoria Planning Provisions facilitate the specific uses
envisaged for the precinct in the Riddells Creek Structure Plan.
How does the Amendment address the views of any relevant agency?
The views of relevant agencies, including service providers, water authorities and VicRoads were
sought through public exhibition of the Structure Plan. The views of DELWP were also sought with
regard to the strategic rationale for the amendment. Full notice of the amendment is proposed,
Page 6 of 31
which will give all relevant departments and agencies the opportunity to make a formal submission
to the amendment.
Does the Amendment address relevant requirements of the Transport Integration Act
2010?
The amendment proposes to rezone two areas of non-urban land on the fringe of the township to
facilitate residential growth in these areas. This is likely to increase use of the existing regional train
that services Riddells Creek, facilitating maximum use of this existing infrastructure.
The views of relevant State Government Departments and transport agencies will be sought as a
part of the exhibition of the amendment to ensure integration of transport and land use outcomes.
Resource and administrative costs
What impact will the new planning provisions have on the resource and
administrative costs of the responsible authority?
The amendment will not result in any significant impact on the resources and administrative costs of
the Responsible Authority, as it will provide greater certainty to assist in effective decision-making.
The cost of administering any increase in planning permit applications is factored into Council’s
budget projections.
Where you may inspect this Amendment
The amendment is available for public inspection, free of charge, during office / opening hours at the
following Council offices and service centres:





Kyneton Administration Centre - 129 Mollison Street, Kyneton 3444
Gisborne Administration Centre - 40 Robertson Street, Gisborne 3437
Woodend Library - Cnr Forest and High Streets, Woodend 3442
Romsey Library - 96-100 Main Street, Romsey 3434
Riddells Creek Neighbourhood House – 59 Main Road, Riddells Creek 3431
The amendment can also be inspected free of charge at the Department of Environment, Land,
Water and Planning website at www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/publicinspection.
Submissions
Any person who may be affected by the Amendment may make a submission to the planning
authority. Submissions about the Amendment must be received by Friday 23 October 2015.
A submission must be sent to Strategic Planning and Environment, Macedon Ranges Shire Council,
PO Box 151, Kyneton, VIC 3444 or emailed to mrsc@mrsc.vic.gov.au .
Panel hearing dates
In accordance with clause 4(2) of Ministerial Direction No.15 the following panel hearing dates have
been set for this amendment:


directions hearing: week commencing 1 February 2016
panel hearing: week commencing 29 February 2016
Page 7 of 31
Attachment A: Land affected by Amendment C100
Page 8 of 31
Attachment B: Neighbourhood Character Precincts
Page 9 of 31
Attachment C: Riddells Creek Structure Plan Implementation Report
Purpose of Report:
The purpose of this report is to explain how the Riddells Creek Structure Plan 2013 is proposed to be implemented through
Amendment C100 into the Macedon Ranges Planning Scheme. The report also provides an overview of the variations between
Amendment C100 and the Structure Plan’s recommendations.
Amendment C100 only addresses recommendations that can be implemented through the Planning Scheme. Recommendations that
operate outside of the Planning Scheme, such as capital works projects, community partnership projects or economic development
initiatives, are not included in the amendment.
Background:
The Riddells Creek Structure Plan 2013 was adopted by Council in December 2013 following extensive public consultation. The
Structure Plan presents a vision for the future of the township to 2036, and details how this vision might be achieved with detailed
strategies and actions. It will perform an integral role in guiding the future use and development of land in the town. Implementing the
key directions of the structure plan through a planning scheme amendment will ensure that the Plan’s vision - recognising important
character, landscape and environmental values, will be realised.
Summary of Implementation:
The key directions from the Riddells Creek Structure Plan have been translated into the following planning provisions:









Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) Clause 21.13-5 – Riddells Creek
Environmental Significance Overlay 7 (ESO7) – Wastewater Treatment Plant
Design and Development Overlay 24 (DDO24) – Riddells Creek Town Centre
Rezoning of the existing Commercial 2 Zone to Special Use Zone 5 (SUZ5) – Riddells Creek Health, Education and Community Precinct
Rezoning of two Priority Development Areas to the Urban Growth Zone (UGZ)
General Residential Zones Schedule 3 – Riddells Creek Town Centre Residential Precinct
General Residential Zones Schedule 4 – Riddells Creek Garden Setting and Modern Residential Precincts
Neighbourhood Residential Zone 7 – Riddells Creek Rural Bushland Precinct A, B and C
Increase the minimum lot size for the Low Density Residential Zone northwest of Main Road to 2 hectares
Page 10 of 31
Glossary:
C1Z
Commercial 1 Zone
C2Z
Commercial 2 Zone
DDO
Design and Development Overlay
DCP
Development Contributions Plan
DCPO
Development Contributions Plan Overlay
DPO
Development Plan Overlay
GRZ
General Residential Zone
EPA
Environmental Protection Agency
ESO
Environmental Significance Overlay
IN1Z
Industrial 1 Zone
IN3Z
Industrial 3 Zone
LDRZ
Low Density Residential Zone
LPPF
Local Planning Policy Framework
LSIO
Land Subject to Inundation Overlay
NRZ
Neighbourhood Residential Zone
MSS
Municipal Strategic Statement
PSP
Precinct Structure Plan
SLO
Significant Landscape Overlay
SUZ
Special Use Zone
UDF
Urban Design Framework
UGZ
Urban Growth Zone
VPO
Vegetation Protection Overlay
Page 11 of 31
Implementation:
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
Settlement
1
2.4.2 / Action 6
Implement the Residential Framework Plan
and Design Guidelines into the Planning
Scheme via Clause 21 and appropriate tools.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategies 1.1 to 1.3 provide direction for
settlement within the town boundary and future residential
growth.
Clause 21.13-5 Objectives 8 to 13 provide direction about
the future preferred character for the township’s existing
residential precincts, including design guidelines for these
areas.
The NRZ is proposed for the Rural Bushland precincts to
retain their consistent low density, rural character and to
minimise bushfire risk to future residents.
Schedules to the proposed GRZ and NRZ are also
proposed which establish variations to the standard siting
and design requirements of Rescode (Clauses 54 and 55).
These schedules implement the strategies set out at
Objectives 7 to 13 and are provided at the end of this
Implementation Report.
2
2.4.2 / Action 7
Investigate and implement the Victorian
reformed Residential Zones within Riddells
Creek.
The NRZ is proposed for the Rural Bushland Precincts. A
4,000m2 minimum lot size is proposed for this precinct to
limit further subdivision and preserve this precinct’s large lot
character.
The GRZ is proposed to be retained in all other areas
where this zone currently applies.
Page 12 of 31
A Neighbourhood Character Study was conducted as a
background document for the Riddells Creek Structure
Plan. The Study divided the township into 24 precincts.
This Study was not adopted by Council.
The Neighbourhood Character Study informed the
preparation of the Residential Framework Plan which
consolidated the original 24 precincts into five large
areas.
A review of the Neighbourhood Character Study was
undertaken in order to translate the intent of the
Structure Plan into appropriate planning controls,
including the General Residential and Neighbourhood
Residential Zones.
As a result of this review, the boundaries of the
neighbourhood character areas were amended. Updated
Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles were
developed which provide a description of each precinct
as well as a statement of preferred future character.
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
3
2.4.2 / Action 8
Undertake strategic work to support the
rezoning of land and apply the DPO to the
Priority Residential Development Precinct.
4
It was not known whether the UGZ could be applied
outside metropolitan Melbourne when the Structure Plan
was prepared. This zone provides a preferred planning
control for facilitating greenfield development.
2.4.2 / Action 12
Investigate the application of the DPO to the
northeast area of Mount Charlie Road.
5
The Urban Growth Zone is proposed for the two Priority
Residential Development Precincts (Areas 4 & 5). This
zone sets the priority development areas aside for future
residential development while requiring coordination of
future growth and infrastructure provision via precinct
structure plans.
The DPO was investigated for this area and it was
determined that the control would provide limited benefit
given that the land is substantially development and does
not require further coordination.
2.4.6 / Action 29
Promote infill and new development within the
existing township residential area utilising the
capacity of existing infrastructure.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 1.1 supports infill development
within the town boundary consistent with neighbourhood
character objectives.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategies 8.6, 9.5 and 10.1 support multidwelling development in the Garden Setting, Modern
Residential and Town Centre Residential precincts which
are part of the established, serviced part of township.
6
N/A
N/A
Strategy 1.4 aims to protect the operations of the
Riddells Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant.
ESO7 is proposed to apply to a buffer around the Water
Reclamation Plant in accordance with EPA guidelines.
The ESO is proposed to protect the operations of the
plant and ensure consistency with Amendments C98
and C99 which propose to implement the Woodend and
Kyneton Structure Plans.
Page 13 of 31
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
Environment and Landscape Values
7
2.4.4 / Action 19
Investigate the potential to include an
Environmental Significance Overlay (ESO)
over watercourses within Riddells Creek to
protect environmental values.
8
2.4.4 / Action 22
Undertake a review of the existing Vegetation
Protection Overlay (VPO) to identify
areas/road corridors that are not currently
included within the VPO but which require
protection. Amend VPO as required.
9
Expert advice and assessments are required to implement
this action. Consequently, investigation of an ESO over
watercourses is identified as future strategic work.
Expert advice and assessments are required to implement
this action. Consequently, review of existing VPOs is
identified as future strategic work.
2.4.4 / Action 18
Developments must be undertaken in
accordance with the Design Guidelines. These
include requirements for landscaping
treatments.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 2.3 requires new development to
maintain existing mature vegetation and incorporate
appropriate landscaping that integrates with landscape
character of the area.
Clause 21.13-5 Objectives 8 to 13 and the associated
strategies provide design guidelines for the Neighbourhood
Character Precincts, including directions for landscaping.
The Schedules to the GRZ and NRZ set out siting and
design standards for the town’s residential areas, including
the requirement to provide canopy trees as a part of new
multi-dwelling developments.
Page 14 of 31
The Neighbourhood Character Precincts were reviewed
and preferred future character statements have been
developed that build on the design guidelines prepared
during the preparation of the Structure Plan.
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
10
2.4.6 / Action 32
Consider potential impacts on biodiversity and
waterways…Promote developments that
enhance existing values (e.g. vegetation along
creek corridors).
11
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 13.7 for Bushland Precinct C
includes measures to protect and enhance the creek
corridors in this area.
DDO24 includes requirements for developments abutting
the waterway to revegetate and enhance this corridor.
2.4.4 / Action 21
Require developments within the proposed
DPO areas to provide open space networks.
Developers in Priority Residential Development Precincts
will be required to develop a Precinct Structure Plan, which
will include open space requirements.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 3.1 aims to ensure waterway
corridors are secured as open space and environment
corridors where practical.
12
2.4.6 / Action 30
Promote development of a walkable
community by providing services and facilities
that cater for everyday needs of the local
residents.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 7.1 aims to retain the C1Z as the
focus for retail and commercial activity.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 7.5 aims to establish a well
connected public realm by improving pedestrian and cycling
connections.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 7.6 aims to consolidate community
facilities in the town centre.
Page 15 of 31
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
Environmental Risks
13
2.4.6 / Action 31
Identify bushfire and flooding risks when
considering new subdivision and development
proposals.
Clause 21.13-5 Objective 4 and the associated strategies
aim to minimise exposure to bushfire and flood risks.
The minimum subdivision area proposed for the Low
Density and Neighbourhood Residential Zones northwest of
Main Road has been established to minimise further
development that would be exposed to bushfire risk.
Built Environment and Heritage
14
2.4.2 / Action 11
Use the Neighbourhood Character Study
(NCS) to inform and guide decision making for
planning applications for subdivision and
development in Riddells Creek.
Clause 21.13-5 Objectives 8 to 13 and the associated
strategies provide direction about the future preferred
character for the township’s existing residential precincts,
including design guidelines for these areas.
These objectives and strategies are implemented via the
siting and design standards set out in the Schedules to the
Neighbourhood and General Residential Zones.
Page 16 of 31
A review of the Neighbourhood Character Study was
undertaken in order to translate the intent of the
Structure Plan into appropriate planning controls,
including the General Residential and Neighbourhood
Residential Zones.
As a result of this review, the boundaries of the
neighbourhood character areas were amended. Updated
Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles were
developed which provide a description of each precinct
as well as a statement of preferred future character.
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
Housing
15
2.4.2 / Action 10
Support development proposals that provide
increased housing choice within the ‘Town
Centre’ and ‘Town Centre Residential Precinct’
as defined in the Residential Framework Plan.
The Town Centre and Town Centre Residential Precincts
shown in the Structure Plan contain parts of the revised
Town Centre Residential, Garden Setting and Modern
Residential Precincts.
These precincts are proposed for inclusion in the GRZ
which facilitates incremental infill development. The
objectives and the associated strategies for these precincts
also support multi-dwelling development that integrates with
the surrounding neighbourhood character.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 5.1 supports increased housing
choice in the Town Centre Residential Precinct.
As a result of the review of the Neighbourhood
Character Study, the boundaries for the neighbourhood
character precincts were revised.
The revised neighbourhood character precincts exclude
commercial zoned land which is subject to different
planning controls to residential zoned land. The Town
Centre and Town Centre Residential Precincts shown in
the Structure Plan contain parts of the revised Town
Centre Residential, Garden Setting and Modern
Residential Precincts.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 5.2 supports incremental infill
development in the Garden Setting and Modern Residential
precincts.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 5.3 supports residential
development above or behind retail or commercial
properties.
Economic Development and Tourism
16
2.4.1 / Action 2
Prepare a Riddells Creek Town Centre Master
Plan.
DDO24 is proposed to apply to the town centre which
provides guidance for the layout and design of development
in this area.
Preparation of an Urban Design Framework for the town
centre is listed a future strategic work.
Page 17 of 31
An Urban Design Framework is considered the most
appropriate tool for coordinating public works and private
development across the town centre as opposed to a
Master Plan.
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
17
2.4.1 / Actions 3, 4, 16 & 17
Encourage development and consolidation of
commercial, retail, light industrial and
community uses within the town centre in
accordance with the Development Framework
Plan.
Encourage uses such as childcare, medical
services, education and community facilities in
the existing C2Z. Investigate whether any
rezoning is required.
Investigate the rezoning of the C2Z land.
Encourage uses such as childcare and
medical services, education and community
facilities, aged care and accommodation in this
location.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 7.1 aims to maintain the C1Z land
as the focus for retail and commercial activity in the town
centre.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 7.2 aims to avoid out-of-centre
development that may negatively impact the economic
viability of the town centre.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 7.4 supports light industrial uses in
the Sutherlands Road industrial area.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 7.6 encourages consolidation of
community facilities in the Heath, Education and
Community Precinct (proposed SUZ).
The existing C2Z is proposed to be rezoned to a SUZ that
facilitates health, education, aged care, community and
limited residential uses.
Commercial and retail development encouraged in C1Z
area, with DDO guiding form and design. Industrial uses
facilitated in existing IN1Z. New community uses (medical,
aged care, childcare, educational) facilitated by rezoning
former C2Z area to dedicated SUZ.
18
2.4.1 / Action 5
Introduce provisions into the Planning Scheme
that require new developments to demonstrate
compliance with the Town Centre Area Design
Guidelines.
Relevant sections of the Town Centre Area Design
Guidelines have been translated into DDO24 which is
proposed to apply to the town centre.
Page 18 of 31
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
Transport
19
2.4.5 / Actions 20 & 24
Investigate opportunities to define land for a
pedestrian and cycling network.
Finalise a Movement Network Study to
promote the development of a pedestrian and
cycling network in and around the town.
20
DDO24 includes provisions to facilitate pedestrian
movement and an access path along the drainage line
within the town centre.
Finalising a Movement Network Study is identified as future
strategic work.
2.4.5 / Action 27
Facilitate and promote the provision of
adequate car parking spaces in and around
the town and monitor and review demand and
supply.
The car parking impacts of new uses and developments is
assessed against Clause 52.06.
Monitoring and review of car parking demand and supply is
identified as future strategic work.
Community Development and Infrastructure
21
2.4.2 / Actions 9 & 26
Levy development contributions from new
greenfield/infill development to fund
infrastructure, including roads and pedestrian
linkages.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 1.3 requires use of Precinct
Structure Plans in priority growth areas to ensure necessary
infrastructure is provided.
Investigation into the preparation of the Development
Contributions Plan is identified as future strategic work.
Page 19 of 31
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
Structure Plan Recommendation
Implementation Approach
Variation to Structure Plan recommendation
(chapter ref / Action no. in Summary p. 24-26)
22
2.4.2 / Action 15
Investigate the suitability and costs for the
development of the area south of the railway
as a long term (20-30 years) ‘Future
Investigation Area’.
23
This area (‘Areas 5’) is included as a Priority Residential
Development Precinct as per the Council resolution on 18
December 2013.
The Council resolution on 18 December 2013
supersedes this action from the Structure Plan.
The Urban Growth Zone is proposed to be applied to this
land.
2.4.5 / Action 25
Requests for rezoning, subdivision and
development must address relevant
infrastructure requirements, including transport
and access.
Apply a Development Contributions Plan to
levy funding for roads and pedestrian / cycling
linkages.
Clause 21.13-5 Strategy 1.3 requires use of Precinct
Structure Plans in priority growth areas to ensure necessary
infrastructure is provided.
Preparation of a Development Contributions Plan is
deferred pending further details about the State
Government’s new standard developer levies.
Investigation into the preparation of the Development
Contributions Plan is identified as future strategic work.
Reference documents
24
N/A
The Riddells Creek Neighbourhood Character Precinct
Profiles, 2015 is included as a reference document.
Page 20 of 31
Some variations exist between the adopted Structure
Plan and the proposed planning provisions. Given this
situation and that relevant sections of the Structure Plan
have been incorporated into the planning provisions
proposed as a part of Amendment C100, inclusion of the
Structure Plan as a reference document is not
necessary.
Rescode variations proposed
#
Precinct
Minimum
lot size
Minimum street
setback
(A3 & B6)
Maximum
Site
Coverage
(A5 & B8)
Minimum
Permeable
surfaces
(A6 & B9)
Landscaping
(B13)
Minimum
side and
rear
setbacks^
(A10 &
B17)
1 metre
Length of walls on
boundaries
(A11 & B11)
Private Open
space
(A17 & B28)
Building
height
GRZ1
DEFAULT
RESCODE
PROVISIONS
N/A*
Average of the 2
adjoining properties or
9m, whichever is less.
60%
20%
N/A
10 metres plus 25% of the
remaining length of the
boundary of an adjoining
lot.
Minimum
dimension of 3
metres.
9 metres
(discretionary)
60%
30%
2 canopy
trees, at
least 1 in
front garden
1 metres
10 metres plus 25% of the
remaining length of the
boundary of an adjoining
lot.
Minimum
dimension of 5
metres
8 metres
(mandatory)
40%
30%
2 canopy
trees, at
least 1 in
front garden
2 metres
0 metres on one side
boundary.
Minimum
dimension of 5
metres
8 metres
(mandatory)
4 metres where no
dwellings exist on
adjoining lots.
GRZ3
Riddells Creek
Town Centre
Residential
N/A*
Average of the 2
adjoining properties or
9m, whichever is less.
4 metres where no
dwellings exist on
adjoining lots.
GRZ4
Riddells Creek
Garden Setting
Riddells Creek
Modern
Residential
N/A*
Average of the 2
adjoining properties or
9m, whichever is less.
6 metres where no
dwellings exist on
adjoining lots.
Page 21 of 31
0 metres on the other side
boundary unless it is a
carport or garage setback 5
metres from the main front
wall of the dwelling
#
Precinct
Minimum
lot size
Minimum street
setback
(A3 & B6)
Maximum
Site
Coverage
(A5 & B8)
Minimum
Permeable
surfaces
(A6 & B9)
Landscaping
(B13)
NRZ7
Riddells Creek
Rural Bushland
A, B and C
4,000m2
(mandatory)
Average of the 2
adjoining properties or
15m, whichever is less.
20%
40%
2 canopy
trees, at
least 1 in
front garden
6 metres where no
dwellings exist on
adjoining lots.
Minimum
side and
rear
setbacks^
(A10 &
B17)
5 metres
Length of walls on
boundaries
(A11 & B11)
Private Open
space
(A17 & B28)
Building
height
0 metres on one side
boundary.
Minimum
dimension of 3
metres
8 metres
(mandatory)
0 metres on the other side
boundary unless it is a
carport or garage setback 5
metres from the main front
wall of the dwelling
Note that the
minimum lot
size and site
coverage
provisions will
ensure
sufficient
private open
space is
provided
*No opportunity to specify
^The side and rear setback standards (A10 and B17) state that if a building is not located on or within 200mm of a boundary, then it should be setback 1 metre or the
distance specified in the schedule to the zone.
Page 22 of 31
Attachment D: Explanation of Rescode Variations
--/--/20-Proposed C100
SCHEDULE 3 TO CLAUSE 32.08 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE
Shown on the planning scheme map as GRZ3.
RIDDELLS CREEK TOWN CENTRE RESIDENTIAL PRECINCT
Explanation: The General Residential Zone is considered to be the most appropriate zone for this
precinct due to its location close to the town centre and its varied character. The precinct can
accommodate further infill development without compromising the character of the township. A
description of the precinct and a statement of Preferred Future Character can be found in the
Riddells Creek Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles 2015.
1.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Permit requirement for the construction or extension of one dwelling on a lot
Is a permit required to construct or extend one dwelling on a lot of between 300 square
metres and 500 square metres?
No
2.0
Requirements of Clause 54 and Clause 55
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Standard
Requirement
Explanation
Minimum street
setback
A3 and B6
None specified
No variation to the default
Rescode provision is considered
necessary given the variable
front setbacks in the precinct.
Site coverage
A5 and B8
None specified
Site coverage in the precincts
varies from 15% to 75%. The
Rescode default of 60% is
proposed to be retained to
enable the precinct to fulfil its
roles as a suitable area for infill
development.
Permeability
A6 and B9
30%
The Rescode default is 20%. A
30% minimum is considered to be
more consistent with the
landscape character of the
township without unreasonably
constraining infill opportunities.
Landscaping
B13
In addition to the requirements of
B13, development should provide for
at least two canopy trees. At least
one of those trees should be in the
dwelling’s front garden
The proposed requirement seeks
to maintain and enhance
vegetation cover within the
precinct to achieve the
precinct’s preferred future
character.
Side and rear
setbacks
A10 and B17
None specified
The Rescode default is 1 metre.
No variation is proposed given
the variability in side setbacks
within the precinct and the
opportunity to provide for infill
development with some
increased housing diversity.
Page 23 of 31
Standard
Requirement
Explanation
Walls on
boundaries
A11 and B18
None specified
The Rescode default allows
buildings to be constructed on
the boundary for 10 metres plus
25% of the remaining length of
the boundary. No variation is
proposed to enable additional
infill development and housing
diversity in the precinct.
Private open
space
A17
An area of 80 square metres or 20
per cent of the area of the lot,
whichever is the lesser, but not less
than 40 square metres. At least one
part of the private open space should
consist of secluded private open
space with a minimum area of 25
square metres and a minimum
dimension of 5 metres at the side or
rear of the dwelling with convenient
access from a living room
The Rescode default is a 3 metre
minimum dimension. The
proposed 5 metre minimum aims
to improve vegetation cover by
ensuring sufficient space is
provided for a canopy tree. The
wider dimension also provides for
more generously proportioned,
functional private open space
areas.
B28
An area of 40 square metres, with
one part of the private open space to
consist of secluded private open
space at the side or rear of the
dwelling or residential building with a
minimum area of 25 square metres,
a minimum dimension of 5 metres
and convenient access from a living
room
As above.
A20 and B32
None specified
The Rescode default triggers a
planning permit for fences above
1.5m in most streets or 2m on main
roads only when they are
associated
with
multi-unit
developments or single dwellings
on lots less than 500m2 in area.
Front fence
height
Any variation to the standard
would only trigger a planning
permit for a lower fence under
the same circumstances. Given
that the vast majority of lots in
Riddells Creek are over 500m2,
varying this standard would be
ineffective.
3.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Maximum building height requirement for a dwelling or residential building
8 metres unless the slope of the natural ground level at any cross section wider than 8 metres of the site of
the building is 2.5 degrees or more, in which case the height of the building must not exceed 9 metres
Explanation: The Rescode default is a 9 metre discretionary height limit. The proposed 8 metre
mandatory height limit aims to maintain the consistent low profile of dwellings across the township.
The standard provides for dwellings and dwelling extensions of up to 2 storeys with a pitched roof.
4.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Application requirements
None specified
Page 24 of 31
5.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Decision guidelines
None specified
Page 25 of 31
SCHEDULE 4 TO CLAUSE 32.08 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Shown on the planning scheme map as GRZ4.
RIDDELLS CREEK GARDEN SETTING PRECINCT
RIDDELLS CREEK MODERN RESIDENTIAL PRECINCT
Explanation: The General Residential Zone is considered to be the most appropriate zone for these
precincts as they are generally characterised by traditional suburban housing that can
accommodate a moderate degree of further infill development without compromising the
character of existing streetscapes. A description of the precinct and a statement of Preferred
Future Character can be found in the Riddells Creek Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles
2015.
1.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Permit requirement for the construction or extension of one dwelling on a lot
Is a permit required to construct or extend one dwelling on a lot of between 300 square
metres and 500 square metres?
No
2.0
Requirements of Clause 54 and Clause 55
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Standard
Requirement
Explanation
Minimum street
setback
A3 and B6
6 metres where there is no existing
building on either of the abutting
allotments facing the same street
The distances specified in the Tables
to Standards A3 and B6 apply in all
other circumstances
Front setbacks in these precincts
generally vary from 3m to 9m in
depth, averaging around 6 to 7
metres. The Rescode default is 4
metres. A 6 metre minimum for
undeveloped areas aims to
maintain the characteristic
pattern of front gardens in the
precincts while allowing for
efficient development outcomes
in undeveloped areas. Standards
A3 and B6 ensure consistency of
setbacks with adjoining
properties in established areas.
Site coverage
A5 and B8
40%
Site coverage in these precincts
is generally 20% to 40% with some
increase on small lots and multiunit development in the Modern
Residential Precinct. The
Rescode default is 60%. The 40%
maximum proposed is
considered to be more
consistent with the character of
these precincts while allowing
some capacity for limited infill
development and residential
extensions.
Page 26 of 31
Standard
Requirement
Explanation
Permeability
A6 and B9
30%
The Rescode default is 20%. A
30% minimum is considered to be
more consistent with the
landscape character of the
precincts without unreasonably
constraining infill opportunities.
Landscaping
B13
In addition to the requirements of
B13, development should provide
for at least two canopy trees. At
least one of those trees should be
in the dwelling’s front garden
The proposed requirement seeks
to enhance vegetation cover
within the precincts to achieve
the precincts’ preferred future
character.
Side and rear
setbacks
A10 and B17
A new building not on or within
200mm of a boundary should be
setback 2 metres plus 0.3 metres for
every metre of height over 3.6
metres up to 6.9 metres, plus 1 metre
for every metre of height over 6.9
metres
Side setbacks in the precinct are
generally between 1 and 5
metres in the Garden Setting
Precinct and less in the Modern
Residential Precinct. The
Rescode default is 1 metre. The 2
metre minimum side setback
proposed seeks to maintain and
/ or enhance a detached
streetscape character.
Walls on
boundaries
A11 and B18
0 metres on one side boundary.
0 metres on the other side
boundary unless the building is a
car port or garage sited behind the
main front wall of the dwelling by
at least 5 metres and the car port
or garage does not abut an
existing
building
on
the
neighbouring property
For buildings proposed on rear
boundaries, the provisions of A11
and B18 continue to apply
The Rescode default allows
buildings to be constructed on
the boundary for 10 metres plus
25% of the remaining length of
the boundary. The proposed
variation aims to maintain the
characteristic, regular
streetscape pattern of detached
dwellings in these precincts. To
achieve this, the variation
requires buildings to be setback
off the boundary. Allowance is
provided for garages and
carports to be constructed on
the boundary provided they are
located to the side or rear of
dwellings and do not adjoin a
building on the neighbourhood
property.
Private open
space
A17
An area of 80 square metres or 20
per cent of the area of the lot,
whichever is the lesser, but not less
than 40 square metres. At least one
part of the private open space should
consist of secluded private open
space with a minimum area of 25
square metres and a minimum
dimension of 5 metres at the side or
rear of the dwelling with convenient
access from a living room
The Rescode default is a 3 metre
minimum dimension. The
proposed 5 metre minimum aims
to improve vegetation cover by
ensuring sufficient space is
provided for a canopy tree. The
wider dimension also provides for
more generously proportioned,
functional private open space
areas.
Page 27 of 31
Standard
Front fence
height
Requirement
Explanation
B28
An area of 40 square metres, with
one part of the private open space to
consist of secluded private open
space at the side or rear of the
dwelling or residential building with a
minimum area of 25 square metres,
a minimum dimension of 5 metres
and convenient access from a living
room
As above.
A20 and B32
None specified
The Rescode default triggers a
planning permit for fences above
1.5m in most streets or 2m on main
roads only when they are
associated
with
multi-unit
developments or single dwellings
on lots less than 500m2 in area.
Any variation to the standard
would only trigger a planning
permit for a lower fence under
the same circumstances. Given
that the vast majority of lots in
Kyneton are over 500m2, varying
this standard would be
ineffective.
3.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Maximum building height requirement for a dwelling or residential building
8 metres unless the slope of the natural ground level at any cross section wider than 8 metres of the site of
the building is 2.5 degrees or more, in which case the height of the building must not exceed 9 metres
Explanation: The Rescode default is a 9 metre discretionary height limit. The proposed 8 metre
mandatory height limit aims to maintain the consistent low profile of dwellings across the township.
The standard provides for dwellings and dwelling extensions of up to 2 storeys with a pitched roof.
4.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
5.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Application requirements
None specified
Decision guidelines
None specified
Page 28 of 31
SCHEDULE 7 TO CLAUSE 32.09 NEIGHBOURHOOD RESIDENTIAL ZONE
--/--/20---/--/20-Proposed
ProposedC100
C100
Shown on the planning scheme map as NRZ7.
RIDDELLS CREEK RURAL BUSHLAND PRECINCT A, B & C
Explanation: The Neighbourhood Residential Zone is considered to be the most appropriate zone
for these precincts given their consistent pattern of large lots with deep front setbacks, regular
subdivision pattern (especially Precinct B) and exposure to bushfire risk. A description of the
precinct and a statement of Preferred Future Character can be found in the Riddells Creek
Neighbourhood Character Precinct Profiles 2015.
1.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Minimum subdivision area
The minimum lot size for subdivision is 4,000 square metres
Explanation: Lots in this precinct are around 3,000m2 to 5,000m2 in area. The 4,000m2 minimum
subdivision area proposed aims to prevent subdivision that would be out of character with the
precinct and that would exposure additional dwellings to the risk of bushfire.
2.0
Permit requirement for the construction or extension of one dwelling on a lot
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Requirement
3.0
Permit requirement for the
construction or extension of
one dwelling on a lot
None specified
Permit requirement to
construct or extend a front
fence within 3 metres of a
street on a lot
None specified
Requirements of Clause 54 and Clause 55
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Standard
Requirement
Explanation
Minimum
street setback
A3 and B6
6 metres where there is no existing
building on either of the abutting
allotments facing the same street
The average distance of the
setbacks of the front walls of the
existing buildings on the abutting
allotments facing the front street or
15 metres, whichever is the lesser
Front setbacks in this precinct are
generally over 15m in depth. The
Rescode default is 9 metres
where there are adjoining
dwellings and 4 metres where
there are no adjoining dwellings.
A 15 metre minimum aims to
maintain the pattern of deep
front gardens characteristic of
the precinct. While there are few
properties in the precinct that
adjoin two vacant lots, the 6
metre minimum setback for
these circumstances will result in
a more contextual outcome in
these circumstances.
Site coverage
A5 and B8
20%
Site coverage in these precincts
is generally 20% or less. The
Rescode default is 60%. The 20%
maximum proposed is
considered to be more
consistent with the character of
these precincts.
Page 29 of 31
Standard
Requirement
Explanation
Permeability
A6 and B9
40%
The Rescode default is 20%. A
40% minimum is considered to be
more consistent with the
landscape character of the
precincts.
Landscaping
B13
In addition to the requirements of
B13, development should provide
for at least two canopy trees. At
least one of those trees should be
in the dwelling’s front garden
The proposed requirement seeks
to maintain and enhance
vegetation cover within the
precincts to achieve the
precincts’ preferred future
character.
Side and rear
setbacks
A10 and B17
A new building not on or within
200mm of a boundary should be
setback 5 metres plus 0.3 metres for
every metre of height over 3.6
metres up to 6.9 metres, plus 1 metre
for every metre of height over 6.9
metres
Side setbacks in the precinct are
generally between 3 and 10
metres metres. The Rescode
default is 1 metre. The 5 metre
minimum side setback proposed
seeks to maintain the spacious,
detached streetscape
character.
Walls on
boundaries
A11 and B18
0 metres on one side boundary
0 metres on the other side
boundary unless the building is a
car port or garage sited behind the
main front wall of the dwelling by
at least 5 metres and the car port
or garage does not abut an
existing
building
on
the
neighbouring property
For buildings proposed on rear
boundaries, the provisions of A11
and B18 continue to apply
The Rescode default allows
buildings to be constructed on
the boundary for 10 metres plus
25% of the remaining length of
the boundary. The proposed
variation aims to maintain the
characteristic, regular
streetscape pattern of detached
dwellings in these precincts. To
achieve this, the variation
requires buildings to be setback
off the boundary. Allowance is
provided for garages and
carports to be constructed on
the boundary provided they are
located to the side or rear of
dwellings and do not adjoin a
building on the neighbourhood
property.
Private open
space
A17
None specified
A variation to the Rescode
default is not proposed as the lot
size and site coverage provisions
proposed are considered
sufficient to ensure generous
private open space areas are
provided.
B28
None specified
As above.
Page 30 of 31
Standard
Front fence
height
A20 and B32
Requirement
None specified
Explanation
The Rescode default triggers a
planning permit for fences above
1.5m in most streets or 2m on main
roads only when they are
associated
with
multi-unit
developments or single dwellings
on lots less than 500m2 in area.
Any variation to the standard
would only trigger a planning
permit for a lower fence under
the same circumstances. Given
that the vast majority of lots in
Kyneton are over 500m2, varying
this standard would be
ineffective.
4.0
--/--/20-Proposed C100
Number of dwellings on a lot
None specified
Explanation: The Neighbourhood Residential Zone includes a default mandatory maximum
allowance of 2 dwellings per lot. This default provision is proposed to be retained.
5.0
Maximum building height requirement for a dwelling or residential building
--/--/20-Proposed C100
None specified
Explanation: The Neighbourhood Residential Zone includes a mandatory maximum height limit of
8 metres. This maintains the consistent low profile of dwellings across the township. The standard
provides for dwellings and dwelling extensions of up to 2 storeys with a pitched roof.
6.0
Application requirements
--/--/20-Proposed C100
None specified
7.0
Decision guidelines
--/--/20-Proposed C100
None specified
Page 31 of 31