Public Transport Operating Model (PTOM) Consultation of proposed changes to the NZTA Procurement manual Questions and answers What is PTOM? The Public Transport Operating Model (PTOM) was announced by government in April 2012, in response to concerns around value for money from public transport investment. PTOM is a combination of planning, funding, procurement, partnering and incentivising tools which can help regions and public transport operators build stronger collaborative relationships. ‘Regions’ includes regional councils, Auckland Transport, unitary authorities and territorial authorities with responsibility for planning and managing public transport services. PTOM has a range of key components which, if used as intended, will give operators and regions confidence to grow investment in their businesses, and allow joint business and unit planning. This should enable patronage and revenue growth, with less reliance on subsidy. How was PTOM developed? PTOM was developed by a collaborative working group of operators, regional councils, the Ministry of Transport and the NZTA. Since April 2012 the NZTA, in consultation with an implementation advisory group also made up from representatives from regions and operators, has been developing operational policies to implement PTOM. Why was PTOM developed? PTOM was developed in response to concerns about increases in public spending on public transport not being matched by patronage increases, very low numbers of tender responses in Auckland and Wellington, and a deterioration in relationships between some bus and ferry operators and regions. These trends undermined the government’s confidence that it was receiving value for money from its investment in public transport. For more information see the Cabinet papers on the Ministry of Transport website – www.transport.govt.nz/ourwork/land/ptom/. What is the NZTA consulting on? The NZTA is seeking comment on operational policies and changes to the NZTA Procurement manual to support the implementation of PTOM. Please note that comments about PTOM itself are outside of the scope of this consultation as PTOM is government policy and will be defined in the legislation through the enactment of the Land Transport Management Amendment Bill. What are the main changes proposed to the Procurement manual? The NZTA would like feedback on the most significant proposed changes to the Procurement manual, which are as follows: A new procurement strategy checklist, to assist regions to take into account the changes in the strategic procurement environment and those features that need to be included for NZTA consideration (eg transition plan, financial incentive mechanism, negotiation strategy). A new partnering delivery model, which will be the delivery model for the majority of public transport services. Under this model suppliers will be selected by: – the price quality evaluation method for tendered units 1 – direct appointment for negotiated and commercial units – quality based selection for new commercial units. Inclusion of joint annual business planning and other requirements in unit contracts, to ensure both parties to the contract plan and invest in public transport units to grow patronage and commerciality. Adoption of a financial incentive mechanism in unit contracts to incentivise both parties to grow patronage and revenue. Changes to some procurement rules and the introduction of new procurement rules to – require like-for-like transitions where there are existing commercial service registrations under the Public Transport Management Act 2008. – enable negotiation for high-performing units in regions with large bus markets where enough tender information is available for benchmarking – set out the conditions under which patronage and revenue data will be provided to registered tenderers. What are the key questions in the consultation document? 1. Are the changes to the Procurement manual consistent with the aim and objectives of PTOM? If not, why not? Aim – to grow patronage with reduced reliance on subsidy Objectives: Grow the commerciality of public transport services and create incentives for services to become fully commercial. Grow confidence that services are priced efficiently and there is access to public transport markets for competitors. 2. Are the changes workable in your area of responsibility? If not, why not? 3. How could the proposed additional guidance in part C of this document be tailored to meet the needs of your region and operational practices? What is the time period for consultation? The consultation period will last for eight weeks and end on 21 June 2013. How do I give feedback? Feedback can be provided verbally, at the workshops or in writing to: Julie Alexander Public Transport Investment NZ Transport Agency, Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141 DDI 64 4 8946754 julie.alexander@nzta.govt.nz 2 Where can I find out more? To find out more contact Julie Alexander or your local NZTA Planning and Investment team. Information workshops are being held during the consultation period in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch. How does this relate to the Land Transport Management Amendment Bill? There are three key parts of the PTOM implementation framework shown in the diagram below. The legislation currently before Parliament sets the legal framework for PTOM, supported by changes to the NZTA’s Procurement manual and Guidelines for the development of regional public transport plans. These three parts work together. 3 Do regional public transport plans (RPTPs) need to be reviewed? Regional public transport plans (RPTPs) continue to be key statutory plans required by legislation. New RPTPs will need to be prepared under the LTMAB before regions go to tender or by July 2015. An RPTP must be reviewed at least every 3 years and contains unit descriptions and policies relating to the provision of public transport services. Regions are responsible for adopting the plans but must engage with operators in developing them, particularly when determining unit design and fare setting policies. Plans are publicly consulted on. The NZTA is reviewing its Guidelines for the development of regional public transport plans and these will be consulted on later this year. Do procurement strategies need to be reviewed? Yes, PTOM is a strategic change in the way public transport is planned and procured. Procurement strategies are required to be reviewed, to incorporate PTOM requirements, before regions request their next tender(s). PTOM provides an opportunity for regions to work in partnership with operators to achieve improved competition and value for money outcomes that may not previously have been possible, while also improving the effectiveness of services delivered to communities. What will happen during the transition to PTOM? Any existing contracts will continue to apply with the terms and conditions set out in those contracts for their full term and any agreed term extensions. Regions needing to go out to tender in the next few months are advised to talk to the NZTA about contract extensions. Until the legislation is enacted there is considerable uncertainty around tendering, as any new services starting after the enactment will need to be identified as units in a regional public transport plan adopted under an enacted LTMAB. As part of transition planning, regions should in collaboration with operators, ensure that their public transport networks are meeting the needs of their communities in an efficient and effective way, before beginning the process of segmenting the network into units and developing a new regional public transport plan. Alongside the regional public transport plan the region’s procurement strategy will need to be reviewed and NZTA endorsement sought. NZTA officers are available to help with transition planning – please contact your NZTA regional office for assistance. PTOM was developed primarily for bus markets in Auckland and Wellington. How will it apply to my region? Some core components of PTOM will need to be implemented in all regions, and across all public transport modes. These components include defining units, partnering contracts, joint business planning and financial incentive mechanisms. Other aspects recognise that regions’ public transport networks differ greatly in size and characteristics. Some tools, such as the ability to negotiate for a proportion of units, are only likely to apply to the networks with large bus markets, like Auckland and Wellington. Ferry and rail markets have some different characteristics from bus markets, including ownership of assets and investment profiles. The core aspects of PTOM such as the need to define services in units, under partnering contracts will remain but there are some differences in how the model will be applied. Ferry and rail specific aspects are identified in part C of the consultation document (www.nzta.govt.nz/consultation/ptom/docs/consultation-to-support-the-implementation-ofptom.docx). 4 What is a unit? Under PTOM all public transport services identified in a regional public transport plan will be allocated into ‘units’. Units will be defined in legislation and must form a marketable whole and be no smaller than a full route for all timetabled services but may include multiple routes. Each unit will be provided under a contract with the region, with exclusive operating rights. Units can be: tendered on the open market, receive a subsidy, with a 9-year term (in bus markets) negotiated with incumbent operators, receive a subsidy, with a 6-year term • commercial, receiving no subsidy with a 9-year term. During the transition period there will also be some like-for-like units negotiated with a 12-year term. Commercial units Commercial units are operated with exclusive rights under contract but without direct public subsidy from the region and the NZTA (excluding the SuperGold card payments). Provided services remain without direct public subsidy they will not be put out to tender. However, they will still need to meet specific performance measures. The LTMAB proposes that the NZTA will have a new power to approve procurement approaches for services that do not receive a subsidy. Over time, the number of commercial units is expected to increase as operators innovate and invest to improve their commerciality. The contract term is 9 years and there is a process by which other operators could make a challenge to operate the unit at term end. What is a tendered unit? A proportion of all public transport networks must be competitively tendered, and in smaller markets all units will be tendered. In larger markets the proportion of units to be tendered will be determined by the region through its procurement strategy, and this will be influenced by the region’s overall commerciality ratio. Contracts for tendered units will be for 9 years and a reset of the gross operating cost will occur at 6 years. What is a negotiated unit In regions with larger bus markets, units that perform well relative to other units may be directly negotiated with operators rather than going out to tender. This provides an incentive to improve the commerciality of a unit. Negotiated units will have a term of 6 years. Benchmarking information from tendered units will be used to inform direct negotiations and renegotiated contracts. How are negotiated contracts awarded? Any negotiation for a unit contract needs to be based on recent and relevant benchmarking information from tendered units. At this stage the NZTA considers that only Auckland, Wellington and Canterbury are likely to have sufficient units to provide robust benchmarking data. Direct negotiation is still a tool for regions to consider and a value for money case should be provided for NZTA approval. 5 What is the commerciality ratio and league table? The commerciality ratio shows the portion of the costs of providing a service that is recovered from fare revenue. It is calculated for each unit and for the region as a whole. It is used to determine a unit’s placing on the league table and, in regions with large bus markets, consequently whether it will be negotiated or tendered. The commerciality ratio for the region will also be used to assess the region’s network as a whole. The league table ranks all units in a region and will be published annually by the region. In larger bus markets, league tables will be used to determine which units will be negotiated and which tendered. What is the relationship between the commerciality ratio and farebox ratio? The commerciality ratio measures the extent to which the cost of providing the services in a unit is recovered from fare revenue, including SuperGold revenue. This is a measure of how ’commercial’ a unit is. It is used to rank units within a region by placing them on a league table. For regions with large bus markets, this league table will be used as a guide to whether units are negotiated or tendered. The farebox recovery ratio is similar to the commerciality ratio, but it measures the contribution that users make to the cost of providing services. All regions are required to have a farebox recovery policy and an associated farebox recovery target. The NZTA is currently reviewing the farebox recovery policy and will consider whether the ratios can be aligned as part of the review. How will a fair price for negotiated contracts be obtained? Data envelopment analysis benchmarking of winning tender prices will be used to set a benchmark range. If an operator bid falls within this range the contract will generally be directly appointed. If it falls outside the range a negotiation process will start. The NZTA is proposing a negotiation advisor be a part of this process to represent the NZTA’s investment interest and to ensure a fair outcome is achieved for all parties (the public transport operator, the region and the NZTA). What is a like-for-like unit? In regions where commercial registrations forming part of the public transport network were in place before 30 June 2011, in exchange for relinquishing those registrations, operators will be offered negotiated units that contain an equivalent number of in-service kilometres to those held in existing commercial registrations, with a once-only 12-year fixed term contract. Where possible, units with higher commerciality ratios should be negotiated as like for like units. These are a oneoff commercial arrangement, as part of the transition to PTOM. Gross cost resets will not apply at the 6 year term. What happens if there are commercial registrations as part of the urban network? The first step is to understand which commercial registrations will become exempt services (see next question below). Existing commercially registered services under the Public Transport Management Act 2008 as at 30 June 2011 that form part of the core network identified in the RPTP will need to be transitioned into units. Commercial registrations that form a full unit can become commercial units. These units will still be under a partnering contract, but will not receive any subsidy. 6 Commercial registrations that form part of units will need to be transitioned into ‘like-for-like’ units. This will occur through one-off like-for-like negotiations with the operators of these services. In exchange for relinquishing commercial registrations, operators will need to be offered negotiated like-for-like units that contain an equivalent number of in-service kilometres to those held in existing commercial registrations, with a once-only 12-year fixed term contract (see question above). What are ‘exempt services’ and how are they regulated? These are existing commercial services as at 30 June 2011 which will not be identified in the RPTP under the provisions of the LTMAB and will transition to exempt services. These will still need to be registered with the region, but will not be units and do not need to have a contract with council. Exempt services do not have exclusive operating rights and operators of the exempt service will be able to set fares. On an ongoing basis if operators identify commercial opportunities to run services that are not part of the network identified in the RPTP these may be registered with the region as exempt services through a process defined in the LTMAB. What does partnering mean within PTOM and how will it be demonstrated? For PTOM to be successful there is an expectation that regions and public transport operators will work collaboratively to develop and deliver services. Components of PTOM, such as longer tenures and the ability to negotiate contracts for units with a higher commerciality (in larger markets) are intended in part to support stronger partnering between regional councils and operators. Partnering within PTOM does not constitute a formal legal partnership, which has its own legal meaning. Parties are expected to work in collaboratively to develop annual business plans and: devise strategies that will grow patronage without increasing subsidies collectively market the network plan for the implementation of new, improved or expanded services define service standards and innovations to benefit passengers identify the need for desirable business processes, infrastructure and supporting requirements for the network, such as passenger terminals, bus exchanges, ticketing systems, etc share information that will benefit the network as a whole identify and implement incentives that will attract and grow patronage and revenue. What is the new partnering delivery model? The proposed partnering delivery model is part of the NZTA procurement procedure for public transport services and will recognise the different skills and ability of the purchaser and supplier to manage risk. Regions and operators will be incentivised to work collaboratively to grow patronage with less reliance on subsidy, and to achieve high performance standards. Successful collaboration demands that the commercial interests of all parties be aligned. Risk will be shared by both parties through financial incentive mechanisms. The partnering delivery model will become the main delivery model for the procurement of scheduled urban public transport services identified in the regional public transport plan, including partnering for commercial units that do not receive any subsidy. 7 How flexible are the new procurement approaches? The proposed new procurement procedure for public transport services will enable flexibility to tailor tools to specific market conditions, provided that all contracts reflect the requirements for collaborative relationships, annual business planning provisions, key performance indicators and a financial incentive mechanism. If regions wish to take a different approach to that set out they are able to make a value for money case to the NZTA for approval as part of the procurement strategy. What is a partnering contract? The proposed new partnering contracts are a contract for a unit. These will not be net or gross cost based, and financial outcomes and risk will be shared. The contract will reflect core principles of a commitment by the supplier and the region to use resources and leverage off both parties’ investment to achieve shared outcomes through joint business planning, financial incentive mechanisms, performance measures and other initiatives. Will all contracts have to be partnering contracts? It is anticipated that the majority of urban public transport contracts will be partnering contracts. Short-term, low-value contracts (such as trial services, special event services and emergency services) will not need to be partnering contracts but will still need to be contracted under an approved procurement procedure. What are the principles for collaborative relationships? The proposed principles for collaborative relationships that will be included in partnering contracts include: mutual (but clear) responsibilities, accountabilities and outcomes mutual values, benefits and risks leveraging investment from both parties (and third parties as appropriate) culture of honesty, transparency and mutual respect to produce win-win solutions excellent joined-up communication, both internally and externally cooperation in a non-adversarial environment of trust willingness to listen, to learn, to innovate and to develop capability (sharing and learning) efficiency in management and support systems that helps reduce costs. What does annual business planning mean for my region? All units, not matter how small, will need to have an annual business plan. Annual business planning ensures operators and regions work collaboratively to improve services, and potentially increase patronage and revenue through collaboration. The scale of the annual business plan should be commensurate with the expected benefit and size of the market. 8 What is a financial incentive mechanism and how do I use one? The financial incentive mechanism is a partnering tool designed to incentivise regions and operators to maximise unit performance and ensure that both parties have ‘skin in the game’, to encourage them to collaborate. A financial incentive mechanism will be required for all subsidised units, but will be optional for commercial units. The NZTA will not set a default model, but financial incentive mechanisms will need to be designed to achieve the following key principles: incentivise both parties to collaborate to grow patronage and revenue take account of unit and regional market characteristics contribute to value for money apply to all subsidised units and may apply to commercial units by agreement be separate from cost indexation be simple to apply and administer. All financial incentive mechanisms will be based on one of two base models, but can be varied to suit the risk and growth potential of different markets in which each unit operates. The two base models are below, and the NZTA can provide a couple of examples of how the models could look: patronage: linking the incentive directly to patronage change, through a per passenger payment by the region to the operator revenue: sharing the revenue change on a proportional basis. How will PTOM be monitored? The NZTA is required by the Minister of Transport to develop a new monitoring approach to report on the success of the PTOM implementation, and is reviewing its requirements for monitoring the ongoing performance of public transport services. The Minister of Transport requires a report on the effectiveness of PTOM in mid-2015. The new monitoring approach is being consulted on separately. How will fares be set? Regions will describe their policy for fare setting, which will apply to all units and be consistent across the network, in their RPTP. Operators can have input to and potentially influence fare setting through RPTP consultation and annual business planning with the region. What are fare revenue protection mechanisms and why do I need to include these in contracts? Under partnering contracts the fare revenue risk no longer sits solely with one of the parties but is shared between operators and regions so there is a need to have transparency between parties about how they will manage the risk of fare evasion. This is expected to be commensurate with the risk and size of the market. In more complex markets, such as those with rail networks, especially as integrating ticketing is adopted, a more comprehensive fare revenue protection strategy is likely to be required. Will indexation continue to be applied? Indexation will continue to be applied to the gross cost of contracts, to reduce the need for public transport operators to price a risk premium for input cost variations into tender prices. 9 How will disputes be managed? Most disputes will be managed through standard contract clauses. In cases where operators consider they have been adversely affected by a region’s decision about exempt services or new services, there will be a right of appeal to the district court. Will the introduction of PTOM affect the funding for public transport services? PTOM is not expected to change the funding available. No specific funding has been allocated for the implementation of PTOM. Government funding will continue to be allocated through the National Land Transport Fund to give effect to the government’s priorities as set out in the Government Policy Statement on Land Transport Funding (www.transport.govt.nz/ourwork/KeyStrategiesandPlans/GPSonLandTransportFunding/ ), and interpreted in the Investment and Revenue Strategy (www.nzta.govt.nz/planning/programming/docs/nltp-2012-15-irs.pdf). What incentives are proposed for regions and operators to invest and innovate? PTOM provides greater opportunities for operators to invest and innovate through partnering contracts with: 9-year tenures for tendered bus units 6-year tenures for negotiated units 9-year terms for commercial bus units financial incentive mechanism to share the benefits of increased patronage and revenue annual business planning to enable operators to work collaboratively with regions to improve services. In larger markets PTOM provides opportunities for bus units that are performing well and have high commerciality ratios to be renegotiated at the end of the term rather than going out to tender. How will PTOM create opportunities for public transport operators to enter new markets? Open competitive tender rounds will provide an opportunity for operators to enter new public transport markets. PTOM encourages and enables better access to public transport markets for competitors. The previous three years of patronage and revenue information will be provided to registered tenderers who have signed a confidentially agreement and lodged a refundable bond. What information will be shared with registered tenderers? Operators of all units will be required to provide patronage and revenue information (among other information) to the region and the NZTA, to assist with the ongoing monitoring of the performance of the unit. Recent revenue and patronage information for units going out to tender will be shared with registered tenderers, who have lodged a bond and signed a confidentiality agreement. 10 What opportunities does PTOM provide for public transport operators to start new services? Public transport operators will still be able to start new exempt services through a registration process, if these are not part of the network identified in the RPTP. The Land Transport Management Amendment Bill sets out the registration process. Operators will also be able to have input into the public transport network and unit design through the RPTP process, including identifying potential new commercial units. How will the change in NZTA policy in respect of payments for concessionary fare ‘top ups’ affect PTOM and what should affected parties do? The concessionary fare scheme (CFS) was introduced in the early 1990s, to protect operators from any financial loss if the regions introduced a new concessionary fare after the net contract was awarded (or came into effect). This provided for a ‘top up’ to be made to make up the difference between the fare charged at the commencement of the contract and the new concession. This was provided for in the National Land Transport Programme (NLTP) under category, ‘W/C 513, Bus and ferry concessionary fares’. In 2011 the NZTA reviewed work categories for the 2012/15 NLTP and removed W/C 513. Any provision needed to cover legacy cases is to be included as a component of the cost of services (W/C 511, Bus services or W/C 512, Passenger ferry services). In some regions the removal of W/C 513 may impact on the calculation of commerciality ratios (and in particular the regional commerciality ratio), and commercial units. The NZTA will work with affected stakeholders. 11