What do the NGSS Practices of the Scientist Look Like?
NGSS Practice and
a clarifying quote from Bybee
Examples
1. Asking questions (for science) and
defining problems (for engineering)
“Formulate empirically answerable questions
about phenomena to establish what is already
known, and to determine what questions have
yet to be satisfactorily answered”
How does each of these factors affect power
output?
 concentration of solutions (with or
without using the Nernst equation)
 difference in electrodes used
 difference in surface area
 difference in standard reduction potentials
 time
2. Developing and using models
“Models make it possible to go beyond
observables and simulate a world not yet seen.
Models enable predictions of the form
“if…then…therefore” to be made in order to test
hypothetical explanations.”
Students could hypothesize likely outcomes of the
above questions using pictures that show a
number of different items:
 electron flow between electrodes
 ions
 predicted power output based on one of
the factors from the above list
3. Planning and carrying out investigations
“A major practice of scientists is planning and
carrying out systematic investigations that
require clarifying what counts as data and in
experiments identifying variables. “
Using the questions above, students can design
experiments that yield data could provide
answers, or further questions. For example:
 How does temperature or concentration
affect power output?
 What factors affect how long power can
be generated?
 What is the relationship between standard
reduction potential and power output?
4. Analyzing and interpreting data
“Because data usually do not speak for
themselves, scientists use a range of tools—
including tabulation, graphical interpretation,
visualization, and statistical analysis—to
identify the significant features and patterns in
the data. Sources of error are identified and the
degree of certainty calculated.”
Once students have this data, they can
 analyze it
 represent it
 compare it to other student’s data
5. Using mathematics and computational
thinking

In order to calculate power, students need
computation.
“Mathematical and computational approaches
enable prediction of the behavior of physical
systems along with the testing of such
predictions. Moreover, statistical techniques are
also invaluable for identifying significant
patterns and establishing correlational
relationships.”

They could also develop a spreadsheet
that makes predictions about the power
output of various electrode pairings.
6. Constructing explanations (for science)
and designing solutions (for engineering)
“The goal of science is the construction of
theories that provide explanatory accounts of
the material world. A theory becomes accepted
when it has multiple independent lines of
empirical evidence, greater explanatory
power, a breadth of phenomena it accounts for,
and has explanatory coherence and parsimony.”
Once students have obtained data, they can begin
to make some specific conclusions about the
factors that they investigated (from the asking
questions section):





concentration of solutions (with or
without using the Nernst equation)
difference in electrodes used
difference in surface area
difference in standard reduction potentials
time
7. Engaging in argument from evidence
“In science, reasoning and argument are
essential for clarifying strengths and
weaknesses of a line of evidence and for
identifying the best explanation for a natural
phenomenon. Scientists must defend their
explanations, formulate evidence based on a
solid foundation of data, examine their
understanding in light of the evidence and
comments by others, and collaborate with peers
in searching for the best explanation for the
phenomena being investigated.”
Of course, scientists can make the conclusions
described in the above practice all day, but are
they right? How tight is the argument being made?
This is where presentation and peer review can
play a powerful role in the classroom. This could
be in the form of:
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating
information
This practice is one that scientists spend a lot of
time on. The lab report is an obvious reporting
mechanism, but other ideas include:






a roundtable discussion
presentations with questions and answers
online critique sessions
Presenting at a scientific conference
Participating in a round table discussion
about the results
Researching in order to formulate a
hypothesis
Bybee, Rodger W. Scientific and Engineering Practices in K–12 Classrooms: Understanding A Framework
for K–12 Science Education. Published in NSTA Journals, December 2011.
http://www.nsta.org/docs/ngss/201112_Framework-Bybee.pdf