Writing a research paper in philosophy
Writing a research paper in philosophy takes at least four steps: (i) initial identification of a
topic, (ii) research into the primary and secondary literature, (iii) development of a specific
problem or question, (iv) outlining and drafting, (v) completing the final piece.
1) Identification of a topic
Look back at the readings for the class and think about which ones particularly interested
you. You’re going to spend a while with your chosen topic, so you want to make sure it’s one
you’re not going to get quickly bored with! At this stage, you’re not looking for a specific
problem or question – just a general area in the work of one or two authors that seems like it
might be worth exploring in more detail. Possible topics might include:
-
Rawls’s account of the original position
Locke’s view of property and labor-mixing
Wolff’s version of philosophical anarchism
Note how broad these topics are – there is no specific claim or question identified here, just
a general area to explore.
2) Research into the primary and secondary literature
This is where you begin to narrow down your sense of what you’re going to write about.
Let’s say that you’re writing about Locke on property. The first thing you’ll notice is that the
piece that we read by Locke is only a very brief extract from a longer work, the Second Treatise
on Government. If you’re writing a research paper on Locke, you need to have read more of
that text than just a couple of pages. At the very least, you’ll need to read the entire chapter
in which he discusses the issue of property, and you may find yourself wanting to read more
to give yourself some of the necessary background to that chapter.
After you’ve done some preliminary work on the primary text, you’ll want to start looking at
the secondary literature. There are four very useful sources here:
a) The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy
This online encyclopedia is free to use, and the quality of the articles is excellent. If you
search for “locke property” you’ll turn up a number of different articles: one on “Property
and Ownership”, one on “John Locke” and one on “Locke’s Political Philosophy”. All three
of these articles are going to be useful to you. The article on property and ownership helps
to clarify some of the central issues in the debate and put Locke’s position in the context of
those of other philosophers. The article on Locke’s political philosophy is even more
helpful, though. Along with an explanation of the basics of Locke’s views, it introduces you
to some of the main debates in the secondary literature, with bibliographic details for all of
the relevant texts. (We’ll come back to this below.)
b) PhilPapers
This is an excellent resource that most professional philosophers use. It’s a free online
database containing a good proportion of all of the philosophy that’s ever been published, in
many cases with links to places you can get the content online. This is often a great place to
look for articles that have been turned up on your SEP search, but it has a search engine that
is often a good starting point in its own right. For our Locke project, there are only a few
hits, mostly because a lot of the debate has taken place in books, but a couple of the articles
here are still very useful.
c) The Philosopher’s Index
This has been around for longer than PhilPapers, and does pretty much the same kind of
thing, but the results are sometimes different, so it’s often worth checking both. This is not
available free online, but as long as you’re on the Sewanee network you can access it via the
library. Go to Research Resources / Electronic Databases / Philosophy to access it.
d) The library
The Sewanee library can be useful to you in three main ways. First, for finding books that
you turn up in your online searches. Often, these will be in the collection, but if they’re not,
it’s possible to request an InterLibrary loan, which will generally get you pretty much
anything you want as long as you allow a few days notice. Second, once you’ve found the
place in the stacks where your author or topic is located, you can often find interesting
things just by browsing the adjacent shelves – it’s an old-school method, but sometimes it
works quite well. Third, the staff at the library are paid to help students like you with their
research projects, and they will be delighted if you ask them to do this, so go ahead and ask!
3) Development of a specific problem or question
If you make use of the resources above, you have a very good chance of discovering a good
problem or question to address. Say that you were already interested in Robert Nozick’s
famous “tomato juice in the ocean” criticism of Locke’s labor-mixing criterion. In the SEP
article, you discover that James Tully responded to this objection on Locke’s behalf, arguing
that Nozick had misunderstood Locke’s position. Reading further, you see that Jeremy
Waldron criticized Tully’s interpretation of Locke, but Gopal Sreenivasan subsequently
defended Tully. Now you’re beginning to develop a specific question, with a deep secondary
literature. Does Nozick’s tomato juice objection rest on a misunderstanding of Locke’s
position?
In order to develop this question, you’ll need to go back to your primary and secondary texts
to make sure that you’ve looked at the problem from all angles. First, you’ll probably want to
get hold of the book from which the Nagel extract we read was taken – that’s Anarchy, State,
and Utopia – and find the criticism of Locke in its context. Then you’ll want to look at the
other secondary literature – Tully, Waldron, Sreenivasan, etc. – and build up a sense of the
debate. Some of this reading might take you back to the primary texts. For example, Tully
supports his argument by citing passages from Locke’s First Treatise on Government, so you’ll
probably want to get hold of that and take a look at the sections he cites. One very
important strategy to make use of at this stage of the project is following the footnotes. All
serious academic books and articles make extensive use of footnotes and bibliographies to
cite all of the works referenced in the text. By following up these footnotes, you can get the
sense of a debate surprisingly quickly.
One thing to note about the specific problem that we’re developing here is that it’s not quite
as straightforward as the kind of problem you’d address in a shorter paper – e.g. is Locke’s
account of labor-mixing a convincing one? For a research paper, your argument needs to be
responsive to a debate in the secondary literature, and that often means it’s going to focus on
a much narrower and more specific issue. Paradoxically, then, the thesis for which you argue
in a research paper is actually likely to be more qualified and restricted than the thesis for
which you would argue in a shorter paper. In our example, you may end up arguing that
Nozick’s criticism does turn out to rest on a misunderstanding of Locke’s position. That
doesn’t commit you to any view about whether Locke’s argument is successful overall – it
just commits you to the view that this specific criticism by Nozick is not a viable one. What
we’re really hoping for, however, is that this conclusion ends up telling us something
interesting about Locke – for example, that the labor-mixing argument depends on premises
or assumptions that aren’t really evident on a first reading. This is where writing a research
paper can get really exciting – if it goes well, you actually end up shedding light on questions
that wouldn’t have been clear at all if you hadn’t done all of that research!
4) Outlining and drafting
Writing a 15-page paper can seem very daunting if you’re used to writing much shorter
pieces of work. The key here is to realize that longer papers are always divided into sections.
In our example, your initial plan might look something like this:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
Introduction
Locke’s account of labor-mixing and Nozick’s criticism
Tully’s defense of Locke
Debating Tully’s interpretation: Waldron and Sreenivasan
Conclusion
The introduction here should be less than a page, and the conclusion shouldn’t be more than
two pages. That leaves about 12 pages left, so what you’re actually looking at is three
sections of around 4 pages each. All of a sudden, that might not seem like much space! A lot
of pages here are going to be taken up explaining the different positions and their relations
to each other, so the amount of space that’s actually devoted to articulating your own view is
relatively little. That space is extremely important, though – your argument is what is going
to tie all of this material together into a coherent whole. This is where what you learned for
writing shorter papers still applies: you need a clear thesis, good signposting language
throughout, and constant reminders to the reader of where the argument is going. In a paper
like this, it’s a very good idea to begin each section with a mini-introduction that reviews
what has been done so far and introduces the points that will be made in the current section.
People have different processes for outlining and drafting – the key thing is that you have to
have some kind of process. I’m going to want to meet with you to discuss an outline and
bibliography, which should include a statement of the question or problem that you’re
addressing and the thesis for which you will argue, a list of the sections you are planning to
have in your paper, a brief paragraph (or paragraph-length notes) summarizing each one, and
a bibliography listing all of the primary and secondary sources that you have researched and
plan to cite in the final piece. I also strongly recommend that you also meet with me at least
a week in advance of the deadline to discuss a full draft of the paper.
5) Completing the final piece
One very important thing to bear in mind about your final piece is that it should not
necessarily include every single thing you’ve read and every single paragraph you’ve written.
Most graduate students and professional philosophers will read a lot of chapters and articles
that never make it into the final draft of their paper – you should expect some dead ends.
Equally, it is quite normal for large chunks and even entire sections of your early drafts to be
deleted entirely from the final piece. Very often, the only way to really figure out if an idea or
argument makes sense is to start writing, and sometimes the only product of a couple of
hours hard work at the keyboard is the realization that the argument you were trying to make
just isn’t going to fly. This is always discouraging at the time, but it’s important to remind
yourself that it’s an inevitable part of the process, and that none of the time you spend
reading or writing is wasted, even if it didn’t result in anything that went into the final draft.
(My own experience is that at least 60% of what I write ends up going in the trash can, and
in many cases it’s probably more than that. One way to deal with the emotional cost of all
that deletion is to keep a separate document open for you to cut and paste your deleted
sections into – that means you’ll still have them if you change your mind, and even if you
don’t, you’ll have some kind of tangible record of the work you put in.) The most important
thing is that the final piece should read like a single, coherent line of thought, but there’s
almost no chance of achieving that if you just sit down and expect all 15 pages to flow out
just like that.
One important aspect of completing a research paper is including a properly formatted
bibliography and notes. I recommend that you use the Chicago Manual of Style, which can be
accessed online for free through the Sewanee network, and which includes excellent
guidelines and examples for exactly how to format notes and bibliographical entries for all
kinds of different texts. I suggest that you try formatting your bibliography before we meet
to discuss your outline, so that if you have any questions they can be dealt with then.