FRAMPTON
Prosecution allegations
Your Honour.
As a result of information received, police attended at a jewellery shop on Port
Road, Allenby Gardens and took possession of a brooch on the 11th April 2012.
The brooch was taken to the home of a Lady Cooper at North Adelaide where the
brooch was identified as one taken in a burglary a month earlier. The burglary
took place on the 9th March 2012.
The proprietor of the jewellery store was questioned and as a result of
information received from him, police questioned the defendant, Angas
Frampton.
The defendant admitted that he had taken the brooch to the jeweller and had
received $600 for the brooch. He said that he had received the brooch from a
man by the name of Carlos. He said he had paid $200 for it and that he knew
when he took it that it was stolen, or thought it very likely that it was stolen.
He said that he believed that the brooch would be worth somewhat more than
$200.
It was put to him that the brooch was worth about $2 100. He said that he had
no idea that it would be worth that amount.
The brooch was recovered in good condition.
burglary are continuing.
Investigations in relation to the
The defendant has three prior Court appearances, all in the Adelaide Youth Court
on 4 June 2004 when he was charged with assaulting police, offensive language
and carrying an offensive weapon. All of the charges were dismissed without
conviction.
2
EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Form 4
Court Use
INFORMATION
Magistrates Court of South Australia
www.courts.sa.gov.au
Summary Procedure Act, 1921
Sections 101
date filed
Informant
Name:. THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBER OF THE POLICE FORCE
Address
ADELAIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION
Defendant
Name:
FRAMPTON, Angus
Address
Offence details
The Information of Police of Adelaide who on this 20th day of April 2012 states that Angus Frampton
on 17th day of March 2012 at Croydon in the said State:
1. Received property, namely one brooch of the value of $2,100 the property of Lady Eleanor Cooper
knowing the same to have been stolen.
Section 196 of Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935.
2. On 11th April 2012 at Allenby Gardens, with intent to defraud, obtained money of the amount of
$600 by falsely pretending that he was the owner of the brooch.
Section 195 of Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935.
Other orders sought (forfeiture, compensation, additional penalty, destruction or the like – Rule 15.03)
..............................
Date
..........................................
Informant
..........................................
Witness
(Registrar, Deputy Registrar or Justice of the Peace)
(Not required if Complainant is a Public Authority)
3
Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935
134—Theft (and receiving)
(1)
A person is guilty of theft if the person deals with property—
(a)
dishonestly; and
(b)
without the owner's consent; and
(c)
intending—
(i)
to deprive the owner permanently of the property; or
(ii)
to make a serious encroachment on the owner's proprietary rights.
Maximum penalty:
(a)
for a basic offence—imprisonment for 10 years;
(b)
for an aggravated offence—imprisonment for 15 years.
139—Deception
A person who deceives another and, by doing so—
(a) dishonestly benefits him/herself or a third person; or
(b) dishonestly causes a detriment to the person subjected to the deception or a third person,
is guilty of an offence.
(a) for a basic offence—imprisonment for 10 years;
(b) for an aggravated offence—imprisonment for 15 years.