Session 1 Facilitator’s Guide: Making Sense of Classroom Data: “Trackers” and The Atlas Protocol Sequence of Sessions Targets for this Session: 1. I can examine data effectively. 2. I can make data-based decisions regarding students’ achievement of specific writing standards. High-Level Purpose of this Session In this opening session, participants will experience the ATLAS Protocol as they examine a classroom data set. Through this case study, participants will learn a method for determining “priority standards” and implications for curriculum, instruction, and assessment of the teaching and learning for the upcoming year. Related Learning Experiences This NTI is focused on discovering next steps from data, learning more about the standards, and developing “focused” or supplemental standards-based lessons based on students’ writing development needs as suggested by data. This opening session is the foundation for the sessions that are to follow at this NTI. Key Points Protocols support effective conversations about data. Teachers can create simple systems for tracking students’ progress and making instructional decisions. The point of analyzing data is to uncover implications for curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Session Outcomes What do we want participants to be able to do as a result of this session? 1. I can examine data effectively. 2. I can make data-based decisions regarding students’ achievement of specific writing standards. How will we know that they are able to do this? Observation of observations, interpretations, and implications posted on chart paper. Groups’ responses to observations, interpretations, and implications. Session Overview Section 1. Greetings and Group Grounding Time 20 Overview ● minutes ● Review overall purpose for NTI, EL’s approach to PD, learning targets, journal. Participants form triads and tell 3-2-1 stories. Prepared Resources Journals Facilitator’s Guide PPT Norms for Collaboration Facilitator Preparation Be sure you understand the flow of the entire NTI. Be ready to connect this session to ones that follow. 2. Atlas Protocol 60 Introduce participants to Norms for Collaboration as means of reflecting on what they just did. Participants’ use the Atlas Protocol to examine either elementary or middle level data set. Participants share findings. Atlas Protocol Classroom “trackers.” Chart Paper Markers Review or complete protocol using data set. Examine own findings in order to anticipate group’s response. Participants reflect on power of the protocol. Participants reflect on how the Atlas Protocol might be used back at their school(s). Journals in Participant’s Notebooks Familiarize yourself with location of all materials. minutes 3. Synthesis 10 ● minutes ● Session Roadmap Section 1: Greetings and Group Grounding Time: 9:30 to 9:50 Materials: Participant’s Notebooks PPT Time Slide #/ Pic of Script/ Activity directions Slide 1 minutes PPT. Slide #1, #2 ● Introduce yourself (and perhaps your facilitation partner) and tell Small groups at tables a bit of background. If relevant, share your experience with school change. NOTE TIME HERE – BE BRIEF. 5 minutes PPT. Slide #3, #4 ● Introduce EL’s approach to PD, the learning targets for the NTI, and focus for the entire NTI; highlight the target for this particular session. 7 minutes PPT. Slide #5 ● Ask participants to form triads at tables. Encourage them to tell their triads “3-2-1 Stories” – 3: Things about teaching students to write well that challenge you. 2: Successes that you’ve had. 1: Way you’ve helped students understand and do something about specific issues in their writing. ● 1 minute to prep then 2 minutes per participant. ● Introduce the Norms for Collaboration. Discuss briefly how norms enrich protocols and ensure that conversations maintain a professional and collegial tone while digging deeply into challenging issues. Ask participants to rate themselves on the Norms Inventory based on how they just interacted in the 3-2-1 Stories Throughout the institute they will be asked to participate in these types of collaborative activities. Ask them to reflect on areas where they can improve their habits. 5 minutes PPT. Slide #6 ● ● GROUPING Section 2: Using the Atlas Protocol Time: 9:50 to 10:50 Materials: Atlas Protocol Sample Classroom Trackers Chart Paper Markers Time Slide #/ Pic of Slide Script/ Activity directions 5 mins PPT Slide #6 Show participants how teachers can create simple trackers by analyzing the standards in their Unit Plans. 5 mins PPT. Slide #7 Direct participants to this quote from the Atlas Protocol in their Participant’s Notebooks. “A structured dialogue format is a way of organizing a group conversation by clearly defining who should be talking when and about what. While at first it may seem rigid and artificial, a clearly defined structure frees the group to focus its attention on what is most important. In general, structured dialogue formats allot specified times for the group to discuss various aspects of the work.” Let them know that in this session they will practice using a protocol for examining data. Hopefully this protocol is GROUPING 5 mins PPT. Slide #8 40 PPT. Slide #9 something they can use back in their school(s). Ask participants to skim the rest of the Atlas Protocol for “gist.” What are the specific parts of the protocol? What roles do different participants’ take? How long should the entire protocol take? Ask participants to divide their tables in half to work in groups of 5. Encourage them to move their chairs so groups are seated facing each other. Ok to move away from tables to form clusters around the room. Each group should have a piece of chart paper and a marker or two. Divide the chart paper into 3 columns – “Observations,” “Interpretations,” “Implications.” Each group should select a facilitator, timekeeper, and recorder. Direct participants to either the elementary or secondary data sets in their Participant’s Notebooks. Let participants know that although this is a fictional data set, it represents the overall achievement of a real school district: o Rural o 55% free and reduced lunch o 13% special education o 6% ELLs Ask participants to spend 5 minutes silently reading the data. Tell participants they are going to begin at the Describing the Data (Observations) section of the protocol, but before they start, you are going to clarify the difference between an observation of data and a judgment from data. Observation: The first school’s performance exceeds the second school’s performance on 80% of the items. o Judgment: The first school’s teachers are more aligned to the Common Core. Remind groups that facilitators and timekeepers will be essential to the success of this experience. Start the protocol (10 minutes): o The facilitator asks: “What do you see?” o During this period the group gathers as much information as possible from the data. o Group members describe what they see in data, avoiding judgments about quality or interpretations. It is helpful to identify where the observation is being made—e.g., “On page one in the second column, third row . . . “ o If judgments or interpretations do arise, the facilitator should ask the person to describe the evidence on which they are based. o It may be useful to list the group’s observations on chart paper. If interpretations come up, they can be listed in another column for later discussion during Step 3. Note: The session facilitator should also keep time and stop the groups after 10 minutes. Ask participants to report out 2-3 observations. Clarify the difference between observations and judgments if needed. Restart the protocol at “Interpreting the Data” (10 minutes). o The facilitator asks: “What does the data suggest?” Second question: “What are the assumptions we o PPT. Slide #10 PPT. Slide #11 make about students and their learning?” During this period, the group tries to make sense of what the data says and why. The group should try to find as many different interpretations as possible and evaluate them against the kind and quality of evidence. o From the evidence gathered in the preceding section, try to infer: what is being worked on and why? o Think broadly and creatively. Assume that the data, no matter how confusing, makes sense to some people; your job is to see what they may see. o As you listen to each other’s interpretations, ask questions that help you better understand each other’s perspectives. Note: The session facilitator should also keep time and stop the groups after 10 minutes. Ask participants to report out 2-3 interpretations. Restart the protocol at “Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment” (10 minutes). • The facilitator asks: “What are the implications of this work for curriculum, instruction and assessment?” • Based on the group’s observations and interpretations, discuss any implications this work might have for curriculum design, instruction and/or assessment in the classroom. In particular, consider the following questions: — What steps could be taken next? — What strategies might be most effective? — What else would you like to see happen? What kinds of assignments or assessments could provide o PPT. Slide #12 this information? — What does this conversation make you think about in terms of the curriculum you have in use? About teaching and learning in general? Note: The session facilitator should also keep time and stop the groups after 10 minutes. Ask participants to report out 2-3 implications. If it does not come out in implications, ensure that participants realize that students most need support with specific subsets of the writing standards. Implication is that something is amiss with curriculum, instruction, or assessment of that Standard. Addressing that concern will be the focus on the next several sessions of the NTI. Section 3: Reflection and Closing Time: 10:50 to 11 am Materials: Atlas Protocol Journal in Participant’s Notebook Time Slide #/ Pic of Slide Script/ Activity directions GROUPING 3 minutes PPT. Slide #13 Partners Ask participants to discuss one or two of the following to start to bring the Atlas Protocol to a close: • What did you learn from listening to your colleagues that was • • • interesting or surprising? What new perspectives did your colleagues provide? How can you make use of your colleagues’ perspectives? What questions about teaching and assessment did looking at the data raise for you? How can you pursue these questions further? 3 minutes PPT. Slide #14 Ask participants to briefly reflect on the Atlas Protocol as a process they might replicate in their work away from NTI. • How are you collecting or helping teachers collect similar data? • What are the implications of having or not having this level of data in terms of Common Core implementation? • On module implementation? • Other “ahas” about classroom data and student achievement? 4 minutes PPT. Slide #15 Ask participants to locate the journal page for Session 1 in their Participant’s Notebook. Here they can capture their thinking related to this session or reflect on their achievement of the Learning Targets. There is a 15 minute break before the next session.