Reading Extension
for
Highly Capable Students
Enclosed:
1.
Guidelines/Definition
2.
Characteristics/Needs of Highly Capable Readers
3.
Strategies for SEM-R (Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading) Framework
4.
Overview/Rationale of the SEM-R http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/semr/
5.
Phase 1, 2, and 3 of reading extension
6.
Teacher Reading Log
7.
Student-Teacher Conference Forms
Curriculum Compacting/Acceleration Forms
8.
Student Reading Packet
9.
Student Independent Study Packet
10.
Product Planning Guide – Menu of Products
11.
Example of Menu from a focused unit of instruction
12.
“Bookmarks”
Shelton School District
Reading Extension
Guidelines
for Highly Capable Students
(Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading)
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/semr/
TEACHER . . .
Watch Video! (it’s good) -
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/semr/about/teacherdownloads.html
Introduction – An enrichment based approach/framework to reading
extension
for highly capable students focusing on engagement in
challenging, and higher order thinking skills.
Phase 1:
Book Hooks – exposure
Introduction of “Bookmarks” as probes toward higher order thinking.
Phase 2:
Supported Independent Reading – the heart of the program
Teacher/Student Conferences on a regular basis (min. 1x/week)
“Bookmarks” as probes toward higher order thinking.
Phase 3:
Student Self-Choice Activities (attached)
Pursuit of individual interests – options provided.
Consider using “bookmarks” to encourage a project.
What is the SEM-R?
Students' first experiences with reading should be joyful, and as students grow, they
should continue to enjoy and look forward to times spent reading and listening to
books in the company of classmates. The more pleasurable these experiences, the
more likely it is that students will want to read independently and develop the selfregulation necessary to remain lifelong readers.
The Schoolwide Enrichment Model Reading Framework (SEM-R) is an enrichmentbased reading program designed to:

Stimulate interest in and enjoyment of reading

Promote and develop higher reading achievement

Improve self-regulation and automaticity in reading

Encourage students to select high-interest books that are slightly to
moderately above their current reading levels

Create independent, lifelong readers
Research on the SEM-R has been supported through two federally funded Jacob K.
Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act grants awarded by the U. S.
Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education.

2005-2009: Using the Schoolwide Enrichment Model Reading Framework (SEMR) to Increase Achievement, Fluency, and Enjoyment of Reading (Award #
S206A040094)

2008-2011: The Schoolwide Enrichment-Model Reading (SEM-R) in the Middle
Grades (Award # S206A080001)
SEM-R and Talented Readers
One important aspect of the SEM-R study involves our commitment to provide
appropriate levels of challenge for talented readers. Little research has focused on
challenging talented readers or using strategies that are an important part of gifted
education (e.g., critical and creative problem solving and thinking, curriculum
modification and differentiation, independent study, self-selected products) to
encourage talented students to pursue challenging reading both in school and in their
spare time (Jackson & Roller, 1993; Reis & Renzulli, 1989).
Current research indicates that many talented readers have already mastered the
majority of comprehension skills but are often required to study them again as part of
the regular curriculum. The SEM-R was developed to increase reading challenge and
enjoyment in all students, but one important goal of this approach is to challenge
talented readers.
Characteristics of Talented Readers

reading earlier than their peers,

spending more time reading,

reading a greater variety of literature, even into adulthood (Collins & Kortner, 1995;
Halsted, 1990).

reading at least two grade levels above their chronological grade placement,

demonstrating advanced understanding of language,

having an expansive vocabulary,

perceiving relationships between and among characters,

grasping complex ideas (Catron & Wingenbach, 1986; Dooley, 1993; Levande, 1999)

having skills are advanced in relation to their peers,

possibly not profiting from conventional instruction in reading (Levande, 1999)

benefiting from diagnostically based instruction to ensure that their skills continually
improve.
Needs of Talented Readers
Researchers who have examined practices for talented readers agree that regular
reading instruction is often too easy for talented readers (Collins & Aiex, 1995; Dole &
Adams, 1983; Reis & Renzulli, 1989; Shrenker, 1997) and that talented readers need
different reading instruction. The appropriate match between a learner's abilities and
the difficulty of the instructional work must be sought, and the optimal match should
be instruction that is slightly above the learner's current level of functioning. As Chall
and Conrad (1991) state, when the match is optimal, learning is enhanced; however,
"if the match is not optimal [i.e., the match is below or above the child's level of
understanding and knowledge], learning is less efficient and development may be
halted" (p. 19).
Talented readers have responded well to:

high interest literature geared toward the students' reading levels rather
than age (Renzulli, 1977),

instruction geared toward the students' strengths (Renzulli & Reis, 1985;
1997)

focus on developing higher level comprehension skills (Collins & Kortner,
1995)

use of higher level questioning and opportunities to incorporate prior
knowledge in reading experiences

book discussions can also provide talented readers with the opportunity to
interact with intellectual peers and to discuss their ideas in greater depth

reading conferences facilitated by a teacher and focused on themes and
ideas rather than on facts and plot summaries (Halsted, 1990).
Unfortunately, using textbooks, basal readers, or even self-selected reading material
that may be several years below students' reading level may create both halted
development as well as motivational problems for talented readers. Some of your
most talented readers may have learned to be lazy readers and may not react well
to your attempts to challenge them to read at higher levels. The emphasis in school,
however, must be on finding books that challenge and help talented readers to make
continuous progress.
The following strategies
can be used to challenge talented readers in your reading
classroom and are an integral part of SEM-R:



Modification of the regular curriculum to eliminate skills
and work that talented readers have already mastered
Acceleration of content
Substitution of regular reading material with more
advanced trade books

Use of technology and the web

More complex assigned reading and writing




Challenging group novels assigned for discussion to two or
more talented readers
Independent reading and writing choices
Reading on-line from some of the advanced choices
provided in the SEM-R intervention
Independent study opportunities in an area of interest
References
Catron, R. M., & Wingenbach, N. (1986). Developing the gifted reader. Theory into
Practice, 25(2), 134-140.
Chall, J. S., & Conard, S. S. (1991). Should textbooks challenge students? The case
for easier or harder textbooks. New York: Teachers College Press.
Collins, N. D., & Aiex, N. K. (1995). Gifted readers and reading instruction . ERIC
Clearinghouse on Reading, English and Communication Digest #101.
Collins, N. D., & Kortner, A. (1995). Gifted readers and reading instruction. ERIC
Digest. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearninghouse on Reading English and
Communication. Accessed from
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed389637.html on 11-20-01 .
Dole, J. A., & Adams, P. J. (1983). Reading curriculum for gifted readers: A
survey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 64-72.
Dooley, C. (1993). The challenge: Meeting the needs of gifted readers. The Reading
Teacher, 46, 546-551.
Halsted, J. W. (1990). Guiding the gifted reader. ERIC EC Digest E481. Accessed 1120-01 at http://kidsource.com/kidsource/content/guiding_gifted_reader.html .
Jackson, N. E., & Roller, C. M. (1993). Reading with young children.
(RM9302). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented,
University of Connecticut.
Levande, D. (1999). Gifted readers and reading instruction. CAG Communicator,
30(1), 19-20, 41-42.
Levande, D. (1993). Identifying and serving the gifted reader. Reading
Improvement, 30, 147-150.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1989). Developing challenging programs for gifted
readers. The Reading Instruction Journal, 32, 44-57.
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible
programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning
Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: New
directions for developing high-end learning. In N. Colangenlo, & G. A. Davis
(Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 136-154). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A
comprehensive plan for educational excellence.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative
Learning Press.
Shrenker, C. E. (1997). Meeting the needs of gifted students within whole group
reading instruction. Ohio Reading Teacher, 31, 70-74.
Overview
This 14-minute video overview shows
SEM-R working in real classrooms with
real students and teachers.
Getting Started (read this section at the end of each phase)
Successful SEM-R implementation relies on:
shared expectations and responsibility among the teacher and students.
Here are a few tips on introducing SEM-R to your class and clarifying expectations:

Take a class period to introduce each of the Phases to your students. Explain the purpose and
procedures, and discuss expectations for behavior and strategies students may use for selfregulation. Remember to phrase expectations positively and emphasize the SEM-R focus on
developing reading enjoyment!

Take time to introduce the details of the student log and expectations for completing it. Show the
sample pages, and consider showing an example of a poorly completed student log.

Use Book Hook time to introduce and generate excitement about the classroom library. Include
expectations for how to browse for new books, how to keep the library organized, etc.

Draw attention to the posters as reminders for SEM-R procedures and expectations.

Remember to use your teacher log to respond to the study expectations and to document your
efforts.
Phase 1: Book Hooks
In Phase 1 the emphasis is on exposure. Students are exposed to high-quality and high-interest
literature of various authors, genres, topics, and themes through teacher read-alouds. The goal of
these book hooks is to entice students to read the book in much the same way as movie trailers entice
people to watch the movie. The book hooks also provide exposure to new ideas, author's craft, and
stimuli for discussion, which allow for higher levels of cognitive development. As part of these book
hooks, teachers provide instruction in response to students' readiness and interest through modeling,
questioning, and discussion focusing on demonstrating reading strategies, self-regulation skills, and the
use of
higher order questions such as those provided in SEM-R bookmarks. These discussions
may also serve as starting points for making multiple connections to other literature, disciplines,
personal experiences, and prior knowledge. While the emphasis in Phase 1 is on exposure, some book
hooks may emphasize different objectives such as guiding students to think critically, apply reading
strategies in their independent reading (Phase 2), or to stimulate interest for further inquiry (Phase 3). It
is important to be considerate of the range of abilities and interests represented in the classroom and
expose students to an appropriate balance of books. This includes easier books for lower readers and
books that will challenge even the most advanced reader. Teachers can also look for creative ways to
conduct book hooks, such as inviting special guest readers, using internet resources, or allowing
students to dramatize a scene.
Here are some brief tips to help you plan effective book hooks:

Before you read – Take Three!
1. Exposure: Share why or how you chose the book (genre, author, topic, literary device?)
2. Critical Thinking: Choose a reading strategy or question to guide your discussion.
3. Connections: Consider links to other books, websites, art, experiences, activities, or projects.

Leave them wanting to hear more (e.g., cliffhangers, unanswered questions or moral dilemmas)

Model the use of reading strategies, advanced vocabulary, and supporting answers with text.

Be Dramatic! Effective variation of intonation, speed, and volume can draw students in.
Over the course of the year, the purpose and length of Book Hook sessions can vary. Early in the year,
teachers may wish to focus more on generating enthusiasm toward reading and establishing classroom
management and behavioral self-regulation procedures. Later in the year, teachers may emphasize
stretching students with more challenging books and questioning, or focus on more specific learning
objectives. Over the course of the year, connections can be made between the various books and
concepts that have been introduced during Phase 1 to other content areas and student experiences. The
length of the Book Hook session can vary depending on the objective for the day, but typically they
should be between 10 and 15 minutes in duration.
More !
Getting Started
Focus on exposing students to a wide variety of genres and authors and generating
enthusiasm for reading.

Familiarize yourself with a few books from a wide variety of genres (including some
non-fiction texts), authors, and reading levels.

Make connections to students' interests and experiences when selecting books.

Select one of your favorite books to use for a book hook.
Share with students why and how you first selected it to read.

Introduce students to the SEM-R bookmarks by incorporating some of the questions
into your book hook.
Explain to the students that they will also be able to use the bookmarks to ask
themselves questions when they are reading.

Have a central goal or main emphasis for each book hook.
Preparing in advance will allow you to make careful links between specific titles,
sections to read, and your objective for the book hook.
Phase 2: Supported Independent Reading
Phase 2, Supported Independent Reading, is the heart of the SEM-R program. During Phase 2, students
read independently from self-selected, challenging books of high interest, while the teacher holds
conferences with individual students. These conferences should last for about 5-7 minutes, and each
student should have a conference approximately once a week.
There are three major features of Phase 2:

Students engage in challenging independent reading. Students should be reading self-selected
books of interest that are at least 1 to 1.5 reading levels above their current
reading level. The amount of time spent in Phase 2 should increase over time, based on student
readiness and self-regulation, until students are reading independently about 35-45 minutes per
day.

Students use self-regulation strategies to monitor their reading and behavior. They may use
bookmarks to ask themselves questions, sticky notes to mark places in the book they will later
discuss in conferences, signaling strategies to let the teacher know if they need help, and their log
to keep track of their reading from day to day.

Teachers conduct individualized conferences to ask students questions and invite discussion;
model and teach reading strategies; and assess student fluency, comprehension, and higher level
skills. It is important for every student, including high-ability readers, to participate in the
conferences on a regular basis.
During an individual conference:
 A teacher asks the student to share information about the book, and then to read a short section
aloud.
 The teacher engages the student in a discussion about the book, asking questions such as those
on the bookmarks, questions that prompt specific reading strategies, or questions specific to
the actual book.
 The teacher uses the student's oral reading and the discussion to determine whether the book is
appropriately challenging, too easy, or too difficult for the student.
At the end of a conference, the teacher gives the student specific
strategies, goals, or questions to work on during independent reading
over the next several days until that student's next conference.
More !
Getting Started
Supported Independent Reading (SIR) occurs within Phase 2. The majority of your instruction will
occur during individual reading conferences in Phase 2.
Key considerations:

Establish clear expectations. (see handouts to be printed . . . “SIR poster” & “Self-Regulation
Poster”
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/semr/about/teacherdownloads.html

Keep conferences brief (approximately 5-7 minutes)

Reinforce an environment conducive to conferences.

In your conferences…

Have authentic conversations around the books to develop students' overall enjoyment of
reading.

Check for appropriate book matches in terms of readability level as well as ideas and content.

Provide specific instruction in reading skills and strategies based on students' needs.

Ask questions to prompt students' thinking – use the bookmarks as a starting place.
Phase 3: Student Self-Choice Activities
Phase 3, Student Self-Choice Activities, is the portion of SEM-R where students have the opportunity to
take the information and skills learned through Phases 1 and 2 and use them to pursue individual
interests based on their learning style preferences. During Phase 3, teachers provide several options
based on students' reading and individual interests for students to choose to complete in an effort to
further expand and enrich their learning. Options provided might include online exploration of interests,
author studies, development of expressive products such as writing, artwork, or performances, or
shared conversations about books. Additional Phase 3 options include continuing to read independently,
buddy reading with a friend, or listening to an audiobook. Over the course of the academic year,
students are encouraged to move from teacher-directed opportunities to self-choice activities.
Compile a List of Options – Completion is critical! May modify/NOT abandon!

Try to provide at least 3-4 options for Phase 3. A few of the simplest options that you probably will
want to incorporate frequently are as follows: (a) continue reading independently; (b) read with a
buddy; (c) listen to an audio book; and (d) write about what you have been reading.

When making an initial list of options for Phase 3 activities, you must keep in mind the variety of
ability levels, areas of interest, and expression styles present within the students in your
classroom. Having examples of completed projects (either that you have done or examples from
the internet) can also help to guide both you and your students.

Traditional options like written or oral book reports should not be completely discounted, but
options like making a book trailer, creating a Facebook page for a character, or writing scenes in
script form give students an alternative option to showcase their knowledge.

Long-term creative projects are an effective option for Phase 3 and in many instances hold longterm benefits in students' self-efficacy and attitude. However, ensure that students have a choice
either in their Phase 3 activities every session or at least for some sessions as a break from a longterm project.

Consider establishing "interest groups" whereby students with shared interests can work on
projects related to that area of interest.
Understanding Readiness

Not all students will be ready to begin Phase 3 at the same time. For instance, some students will
need more support with basic reading skills, while your more advanced students might be ready to
begin independent projects at the beginning of the year.
Logistics

Initially, you should be working closely with students to monitor their project selections and their
progress. Over time, students should begin taking control of their projects as the role of facilitator
shifts from you to them.

Many teachers find it easier (and more natural) to allot entire class periods to working on Phase 3.
This gives students who are working on projects a sizable amount of time to work, but if other
students are not ready for Phase 3, they can continue their regular reading schedule.
More !
Getting Started
Compile a list of options. Start SMALL and dream
big.

Consider student abilities, interests, and expression styles

Show examples of completed products, performances, or services.

Consider traditional and nontraditional choices.

Start with fewer options and expand the menu over time.

Realize that not all students will be ready for Phase 3 at the same time.

Look for opportunities for students to serve others, address real-world problems, and/or present to
authentic audiences other than the teacher.
CONFERENCE PLANNING
Teacher _____________________________/Student ________________________________/Date __________
Area(s) of Focus for the Cycle:
Relevant Bookmarks:
“Back-up” for Books that Don’t Fit:
Special Areas of Focus for Individual Students:
Conference Information
Date:
Length:
Notes:
Book:
Did
the student
read aloud? Y / N
Conference
Focus:
Is
this for
book
appropriately
challenging? Y / N
Focus
Next
Time:
In general, how did student perform relative to your expectations this week? (circle one)
below expectations
met expectations
exceeded expectations
Book Match
Is this book appropriately challenging? Yes / No
Reader & Task Factors
Qualitative Factors
Quantitative Factors
e.g., Interest, Interaction,
Questioning
Complexity, Language, Structure,
Knowledge Demands
Matched: Yes / No
Matched: Yes / No
Other Merit (e.g., Classic, Topic, Personal Relevance):
Student SEM-R Goals for Next Week
e.g., Lexile Stretch Text band,
reading rate
Matched: Yes / No
Key Expectations for Student Next Week:
Behavior/Engagement
Reading Progress
Common Core Reading Standards
Key Ideas and Details
1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite
specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text
2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key
supporting details and ideas.
3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.
Craft and Structure
4. Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative,
and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone.
5. Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of
the text (e.g., a section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole.
6. Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and
quantitatively, as well as in words.
8. Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the
reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to
compare the approaches the authors take.
Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity
10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
Student: _____________________________________________
More !
Written Response Rubric
1= Emerging
2=Basic
3=Proficient
4=Advanced
5=Superior
On topic. Responds to the question.
Well organized. Avoids redundancy.
Articulate. Strong word choice. Clear and concise.
Elaborate: Supported by evidence from text or other sources as necessary.
Other
Bonus: Going above and beyond (e.g., thoughtful / insightful response)
Total Score
Shelton School District
Reading Extension
Student Reading Log
Name:
Teacher:
Grade:
School:
Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/semr/
EXPLANATION for Students:
Reading Logs
The reading logs are used to record which books and how
many pages you are reading and the time you are spending
reading in class each day. The log should be filled out every
day at the end of Phase 2. You should write down the number
of minutes that you actually read in your Reading Log. This means that you should subtract
the time spent doing other things (like going to the bathroom, choosing a new book, or
daydreaming) from the total class time spent reading.
At the end of the week, you will have the opportunity to think about your own
performance and evaluate your book selection, your focus during reading, and your use of
reading strategies. This is also a good time to set a goal for the following week. Your goal
could be related to book selection, reading skills and strategies, behaviors to help you stay
focused, or anything else that helps you to continue to develop as an independent reader.
One day each week, your teacher will have you write about your reading experiences
on the reflection page. Your teacher will choose the topic. You should write this question into
the writing prompt section of the log. At the bottom of the reflection page, there is a section
called “Conference Information”. Your teacher will fill this section out. You can look at this
section for feedback and to help you remember what you should think about as you read. If
you are unsure about how to fill out the log pages, there are some examples in the front of the
book. If you still have questions after looking at the examples, you can ask your teacher to
explain it to you.
At the end of the log pages there are two special sections. First, there is a place to write
down all of the books you have finished reading as part of your work in the SEM-R. Second,
there is a space to write all of the books you want to read in the future. You may find reviewing
this list a helpful way to jog your memory about books that your friends recommended or your
teacher introduced in Phase 1.
Shelton School District
TEACHER Log
Reading Extension
Teacher: _________________________________________________
Reading Section: _____________________________________
School: _____________________________________
School Year: ___________________
Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/semr/
Teacher Logs
This weekly log will assist you with documenting your implementation of the SEM-R
Framework. The teacher’s log is divided into three sections to help you in this process.
Section 1:
The first section provides two sample sets of one teacher's lessons, reflections, visions, and
goals. These examples demonstrate a possible progression of the intervention as the teacher
and students become more familiar with the SEM-R. They also illustrate variations that occur
throughout the implementation process for weeks one and twelve in a seventh grade
classroom.
Section 2:
The second section of the teacher’s log provides the space for you to document your own
implementation of the SEM-R on a weekly basis. The three sections of the first page allow you
to record the various activities that you have completed during the three phases of the
intervention each week.
Space is provided on the second page of the log for you to record your reflections about the
week and to begin planning for subsequent instruction. You may wish to reflect upon the
success of your weekly goal, think about a new strategy that you have tried, or comment upon
things that have surprised or concerned you. This is your space to evaluate, regroup, and plan
for the next week. Use the space at the bottom of the page to focus the activities of your
students and to develop weekly goals and expectations based on your students’ demonstrated
needs.
Section 3:
The third section is provided as an option for keeping a record of the conferences you had with
each individual student on a weekly basis. Please utilize this section in a way that meets your
record keeping and/or assessment needs.
SEM-R TEACHER’S LOG
Teacher:
Ms. Bryant
Dates:
Week 1
Please describe your SEM-R implementation this week. Use the prompts provided as a guide.
Phase I
List the strategies, literary devices, genres, and/or themes addressed this week in Phase 1.
Identify which books were used as Book Hooks.
Monday – The Graveyard Book and Coraline by Neil Gaiman - Discussion of book
selection: methods and appropriate challenge level
Tuesday – Tunnels by Roderick Gordon and Brian Williams - Continued discussion of
book selection and appropriately challenging books.
Wednesday – Guest Reader: School Librarian- with a selection of high-interest books,
discussion of library use
Thursday – Middle School is Worse than Meatloaf by Jennifer Holm and Flipped by
Wendelin Van Draanen – Discussion of characters
Friday – NEVERMORE - graphic novel of Edgar Allan Poe short stories; discussion of
difference between comic books and graphic novels
Phase II
What strategies, literary devices, genres, and/or themes did you focus on with students during the conferences?
How many conferences were held this week? Approximately how long were the conferences?
Monday – Established expectations for Supported Independent Reading and set class
goals for Phase 2. Scavenger Hunt of classroom library and reading resources.
Tuesday – Circulated to help students with book selection.
Wednesday – Observed SIR, met with students struggling with book selection.
Thursday – Conferenced with students focusing on challenge level of SIR books: Met
with Marcus, Amelia, and Brandon.
Friday – Conferenced with students focusing on challenge level of SIR books: Met with
Yashyra, Owen, Seamus, and Vanessa.
Phase III
List the options that were provided for students during Phase III time.
N/A
Weekly Reflection:
I was surprised at how interested my students were in reading some of the books
that I presented during the book hooks. Most students were able to find a book this
week that they were interested in reading. However, there are some students who took
a little more time to find a book. I expect that this will improve in the coming weeks.
I enjoyed being able to connect with the students personally during the
conferences this week. I was also able to point out to some students that the books they
were reading might not be challenging enough.
I struggled with keeping the conferences to 5-7 minutes. I am not sure how to work
in everything I need to do with them in that short amount of time. I am going to try
to work on making them more efficient next week.
In general, how did students perform relative to your expectations this week? (circle one)
below expectations
met expectations
exceeded expectations
My SEM-R Goals for Next Week:
As I conference with individual students, I would like to bring their awareness to
more specific reading strategies next week. Also I want to work on keeping the
conferences shorter.
Key Expectations for Students Next Week:
Behavior/Engagement
Reading Progress
To increase their use of self-regulation
Students will start to recognize and apply
skills during SIR and what strategies to
reading strategies.
use when a problem arises.
SEM-R TEACHER’S LOG
Teacher:
Ms. Bryant
Dates:
Week 12
Please describe your SEM-R implementation this week. Use the prompts provided as a guide.
Phase I
List the strategies, literary devices, genres, and/or themes addressed this week in Phase 1.
Identify which books were used as Book Hooks.
Monday – Mississippi Trial, 1955 by Chris Crowe (Strategy-Determining Importance)
Tuesday – 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne (old copy I found at a yard
sale)
Wednesday – Clockwork by Philip Pullman (Strategy-Determining Importance)
Thursday – Zach’s Lie by Rolland Smith - Student recommendation
Friday – Science Verse by Jon Scieszka and Lane Smith – (poetry)
Phase II
What strategies, literary devices, genres, and/or themes did you focus on with students during the conferences?
How many conferences were held this week? Approximately how long were the conferences?
The strategy focus for conferences this week was Determining Importance. This
strategy is applicable to both the fiction and non-fiction texts students are reading.
Monday – Marcus, Sean, Tara, Amelia, and Jillian
Tuesday – Eric, Daniella, Owen, Brandon, and Carmen
Wednesday – Jake, Sara, Erin, and Miguel
Thursday – Vanessa, Eddie, Kristin, Gavin, and Nicholas
Friday – Cole and Mikayla
Phase III
List the options that were provided for students during Phase III time.
Friday Phase 3 options:
Science Fair research
Web-quest choice
Peer reading
Book Club discussion
Journal writing
Weekly Reflection:
I really enjoyed providing the students time to read and research for their science
fair project this week during Phase 3 time. Since students self-selected the science fair
topics they were really interested in what they were finding out and many students
were reading sources that were pretty advanced. I think it tied in nicely too with the
conference strategy we focused on this week of Determining Importance. Students are
improving in selecting the relevant information for their sources.
I am continuing to work on trying to ensure greater differentiation within
conferences. I am finding it helpful to choose a strategy and a few related questions,
and then choose which questions to emphasize with each student based on the level
they bring to it.
In general, how did students perform relative to your expectations this week? (circle one)
below expectations
met expectations
exceeded expectations
My SEM-R Goals for Next Week:
Provide more free choice and interest based activities during Phase 3. I would also
like to work with the science teacher regarding Phase 3 and the science fair project.
Key Expectations for Students Next Week:
Behavior/Engagement
Reading Progress
I expect that students will transition more Students will continue to apply the
smoothly between Phase 1 and Phase 3, ex: strategy of determining importance to
students will get materials and start
their SIR and Phase 3 reading.
working after only one prompt from the
teacher.
SEM-R TEACHER’S LOG
Teacher: ___________________________
Dates: __________________________
Please describe your SEM-R implementation this week. Use the prompts provided as a guide.
Phase I
List the strategies, literary devices, genres, and/or themes addressed this week in Phase 1.
Identify which books were used as Book Hooks.
Phase II
What strategies, literary devices, genres, and/or themes did you focus on with students during the conferences?
How many conferences were held this week? Approximately how long were the conferences?
Phase III
List the options that were provided for students during Phase III time.
Weekly Reflection:
In general, how did students perform relative to your expectations this week? (circle one)
below expectations
met expectations
exceeded expectations
My SEM-R Goals for Next Week:
Key Expectations for Students Next Week:
Behavior/Engagement
Reading Progress
Student Name
SEM-Reading
Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/semr/
Bookmarks
Developing thinking skills,
critical and creative
problem-solving strategies.