Erik B. Karlsson, 2014-09-29 Entanglement creation in Compton scattering of neutrons on protons and its possible consequences Proofs of equations, etc. Eq. (1): robs = (q/m) × m/(|q|p) = (1/p ) Å (1) In low energy neutron scattering, momentum is conventionally expressed in Å-1 : k = p = mv; 1 Å-1 = 1010 m-1 corresponds to p = 1010 = 1.054 10-24 kgm/s Eq. (4): = 32/[M(E + W)] + 2/M(E + |Ws|) = t + (4) The total cross section is 20.36 barn. The singlet part is (for E<< |Ws|)]; Ws = 66 keV = 2/M |Ws|) = = 19.7 10-28 m2 = 19.7 barn ≈ 95% of total Eq. (5): k cot(kr0 + ) = -√(mWs) (5) First estimate: For k = 100 Å-1, r0 = 2 10-15 m = 2 10-5 Å: kr0 ≈ 2 10-3 <<1 Solve k cot = -√(mWs) for small ≈ tan = 1/ cot = – k /√(mWs) In SI-units ( k i m-1 : = 1.054 10-34 k /√( = – 2.51 10-14 k [in m-1] = –2.5 10-4 k [in Å-1] Eq. (10): r ≤ r0 From eq. (3.a): R0,k(r) = sin(kr0 + sin(√(k2 + U0)r / kr cos sin(√(k2 + U0)r0 Here U0 = U(r) = V(r)×2 (3.a) = m/2 With V(r) = V0 = 2.2 MeV = 2.2 ×106 ×1.602 ×10-19 J and m = 1.67 10-27 kg U0 = 2.2 ×106 ×1.602 10-19 ×1.67 ×10-27 Jkg = 5.89 ×10-40 Jkg, and √(U0) = 2.43 ×10-20 kgm/s , whereas k < 100 Å-1= 1.054 ×10-22 kgm/s, i. e. k << √(U0), or k2 << U0 Introduce: c1 = √(k2 + U0) ≈ √(U0) in I1 = 0 r dr r2 R0,k(r) = [sin / k sin c1r0)] 0 ∫ r dr r sin c1r = = [sin / k c12sin c1r0)] × [sin c1r – c1r × cos c1r] where c12 = U0 . Eq. (11): r ≤ r0 I2 = 0 r dr r2 |R0,k(r)|2 = [sin / k]2 0 ∫ r dr sin2(c1r ) = = [sin2/ k2 2c1 sin2(c1r0)] × [c1r – sin c1r × cos c1r] Eq. (13): r ≤ r0 fk = I12/I2 = 2 (sin c1r – c1r×cosc1r)2/ c13 (c1r – sin c1r×cos c1r) = 2 sin2 c1r × [ 1 – c1r × cot c1r ]2 / c13 [ c1r – sin c1r×cos c1r] = (12) = 2[ 1 – c1r × cot c1r ]2 / c13 [c1r/ sin2 c1r – cot c1r ] = For r = r0, fk = 2 [ 1 – c1r0 × cot c1r0 ]2 / c13 [ ( c1r0/ sin2 c1r0 – cot c1r0)] = mutliply by r0 , = 2 r0 [ 1 – c1r0 × cot c1r0 ]2 / c13 [ ( c1r02/ sin2 c1r0 – r0 cot c1r0)] = = 2 r0 [ 1 – c1r0 × cot c1r0 ]2 / c12 [ ( c12r02/ sin2 c1r0 – c1r0 cot c1r0)] = Introduce F0 = c1r0 × cot c1r0 = √(k2 + U0) r0 × cot √(k2 + U0) r0 and put back c12 = (k2 + U0), fk = 2r0 [ 1 – F0]2 / [(k2 + U0) (c12r02/ sin2 c1r0 – F0)] (13) This differs from ref. [1] in the term (c12r02/ sin2 c1r0) in the denominator, which is missing in [1 (35)], and in that U0 is there neglected in comparison with k2. Eqs. (14): r >> r0 Here, entanglement fidelity at r >> r0 is compared to th dr r2 |R0,k(r)|2 at valid at r0 . Since << 1, cos≈ in eq. (3.b) I1’(r)= r0 r dr r2 R0,k(r) = = r0∫ r dr r sin(kr + ) / k ≈ (1/k) r0∫ r dr r sin(kr) = = (1/k2)[< r cos (kr) – (1/k)sin(kr) – r0cos (kr0) – (1/k)sin(kr0)>] = ≈ (1/k2)[< r cos (kr) – r0 >] (14.a) valid for kr0 <<1 and k >> 1. I’2 = r0∫ r dr dr r2 |R0,k(r)|2 ≈ (1/k2) r0∫ r dr sin2(kr) = (1/2k2) [< r – (1/k) sin(kr)cos(kr) – r0 + (1/k)sin (kr0)cos(kr0)>] = ≈ (1/2k2) [< r – r0 >] ≈ (1/2k2) (r – r0) (14.b) for k >>1 and kr0 <<1 . The development of entanglement for r > r0 is given by the ratio [I1’(r - r0)]2 / [(I2’(r - r0)] =1/k4)[< r cos (kr)> – r0 >]2 / [(1/2k2)(r – r0 )]. fk(r)/ fk(r0) = [I1’(r - r0)]2 / [(I2’(r - r0)] = = (1/k4)[< r cos (kr)> – r0 >]2 / [(1/2k2)(r – r0 )] ≈ (2r0/k2)(r0/r) (15) In the last step, the average of the oscillating term < r cos (kr)> was put to zero. For certain intervals of kr it would give rise to entanglement fidelities largely exceeding that at r = r0 , which is unphysical. Its appearence is taken as a mathemathical artifact connected to the definition of fk(r) in eq. (9). A physical reason for neglecting cos (kr)-terms could be that neutron Compton scattering experiments do not resolve oscillations when the spread k×robs is large. Here k is determined by the angular opening (≈ 0.1 rad) of the detector bank used in the experiments. k = (48.6/√2) = 34.4 Å (cf. Fig. 1) k = 34.4 (sin / cos2×Å = k tg × Below are numerical examples numerical examples for = 60 and ≈ 70 degrees: For 60 degrees (k = 68.8 Å-1): k×robs = 20.6 k ≈ 68.8 × 1.73 × 0.1 = 11.9 and k×robs = 3.57. < cos(k×robs) > is the average over cosines in the interval 18.8 < k×robs < 22.4 radians, i.e. over an interval of 3.57 ×180/ =204 degrees. Split up in 0.2 rad intervals: < cos(k×robs) > = (1/18)( cos 18.8 + cos 19.0 + …….cos 22.2 + cos 22.4)= Average of cos(kr) for k = 68.8 (60 degrees) and delta(kr) = 6, with r = 0.3 >> x = linspace(18.8, 22.4); >> y = (cos(18.8)+ cos(19.0) + cos(19.2) + cos(19.4) +cos(19.6) + cos(19.8) +cos (20.0) + cos(20.2)+ cos(20.4)+ cos(20.6) + cos(20.8)+ cos(21.0) +cos(21.2)+ cos(21.4)+cos(21.6) + cos(21.8) + cos(22.0) +cos(22.2) + cos(22.4))./20 -0.0847 Average of cos(kr) for k = 100 (70 degrees)and delta(kr) = 6, with r = 0.3 x = linspace(27,33); y = (cos(27)+ cos(27.5) + cos(28) + cos(28.5) +cos(29) + cos(29.5) +cos (30) + cos(30.5)+ cos(31)+ cos(31.5) + cos(32)+ cos(32.5) +cos(33))./13 -0.0052 Conclusion: The oscillation is only partially averaged out, but more so at 70 degrees than at 60 degrees scattering angle. Eqs. (18): Start with E = × /t where the passage time through the nuclear potential is (with v = p/m = k/m), t = r / v = r × m/ k (for k = 100 = 1.054 ×10-22 kgm/s and r = 1.2 fm = 1.2 ×10-15 m we have t = 1.2 ×10-15 × 1.67 ×10-27 /1.054 ×10-22 = 2.1 ×10-20 s) but = 2.5 ×10-4 × k so E = 2.5 ×10-4 (2/r × m) k2 (eq. (5)) (18) Units: = 2.5 ×10-4 × k is dimensionless when k is expressed so [E ]= [1]×[]/ t] = [J] With t = 1.2 ×10-15/ 0.63×103 k = 1.90 ×10-18/k s (with k in Å-1) E = × /t = 2.5 ×10-4 × 1.054 ×10-34 k2 /1.90 ×10-18 J (with k in Å-1) = = 1.39 × 10-20 k2 J (with k in Å-1) = = 1.39 × 10-20 /1.602× 10-19 k2 eV = 0.087 k2 eV (with k in Å-1) Introduce k = (48.6/√2) = 34.4 E = 0.087 × (3 Å eV = –1.03 ×102/cos2 eV Numerical example: k = 100 Å-1 : E = 0.087 × 104 = 870 eV Eq. (19): Start from E = –1.03 ×102/cos2 r0 = 2.5 ×10-5 Å robs = 1/(p ×sin ) ≈ 0.33/(sin ) Å (where p is measured in Å-1, i. e. robs in Å) (E)obs = (E) (r0/robs) = (E) ×2.5 ×10-5 × (sin /0.33) = – (1.03 ×102/cos2 ×2.5 ×10-5 sin /0.33 = – 0.0078 sin /cos2 Repeat eq. (18) in SI-units: E = 2.5 ×10-4 (2/r × m) k2 k i m-1 = 1010 Å-1 (18) -1 = 2.5 ×10-4 × 1.054 ×10-24 k = 2.6 ×10-28 k (with k i m ) r × m = 1.2 ×10-15 × 1.67 ×10-27 = 2.00 ×10-42 kg m [2k2] = (1.054 ×10-34)2 ×10 40 k2 J2 s2m-2 E = 2.6 ×10-28 (2k2/(r × m)) in [J2 s2m-2 / m kg] = J = 2.6 ×10-28 × (1.054 ×10 -34 )2× k2 1040 /2.00 ×10-42 J = 1.31x 10-16 J = = 0.87 ×103 eV = 870 eV