THE AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH COUNCIL
Guidelines for URC Funding Opportunities
(Updated: September 12, 2013)
INTRODUCTION
The Board of Trustees has appointed a University Research Council (URC) and approved the
commencement of funding research grants since 1999. Aga Khan University has developed a
significant capacity for multidisciplinary research and graduate studies. Several themes have
been identified for research under “Social and Economic Determinants of Health. The themes
are broadly relevant to the needs of developing countries, and include infection, immunity and
inflammation; Neurosciences; Human development; Non-communicable diseases; Stem cell; and
Maternal and child health.
The URC has been appointed to oversee the support, management and efficient utilisation of
resources for the promotion of multi-disciplinary research activities. It will give particular
emphasis to projects and activities related to the themes identified as priority areas. Further
information is available from the Research Office. While emphasis is given to the theme related
research, the University also supports other quality research projects.
An unrestricted endowment for University-wide research has been initiated by the Chancellor,
His Highness the Aga Khan, with a gracious donation of US$5 million. Over the next ten years it
is expected that the endowment will grow significantly and provide about $2M annually. In
addition, provision has been made for seed grant in FHS and IED. Investigators are also
encouraged to compete for grants from external agencies. For information on external sources of
funding, and a database of external granting agencies, the Research Office can be contacted.
The URC consists of senior management together with representatives of various constituencies
of the University. It is supported by a Grants Review Committee (GRC) which will evaluate
proposals for funding from the University-wide unrestricted endowment for research and other
internal sources that may be allocated. The URC will also be supported by an International
Advisory Committee for Research (IACR), the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) for studies
involving human subjects, and the Ethics Committee for Research on Animals (ECRA).
The URC is pleased to extend invitations for research grant proposals. Copies of appropriate
application forms can be obtained from the Research Office network via the intranet. Instead of
the two yearly call for applications, the URC has increased the Calls to four times a year to foster
rapid turnaround of decisions and to allow timely start of research projects.
Deadline dates for submitting applications
First Cycle:
Second Cycle:
Third Cycle:
Fourth Cycle:
December 31
March 30
June 30
September 30
Every year
“
“
“
1
In case the deadline date falls on a holiday, applications will be accepted till the following working day.
Completed applications should be submitted to the Research Office along with 2 hard copies. Forms are
available from the Research Office website http://www.aku.edu/res-office/res-fop.shtml
OBJECTIVES
Funds will be awarded to eligible groups and individual faculty or students to enable them to
pursue research, especially in the priority areas identified by the University, but also in any other
field that is considered appropriate by the University Research Council. It is anticipated that such
support would enable the investigator(s) subsequently to compete effectively for external grants.
This research funding will also foster development of the capacity for research. URC funds should
be used as a springboard to help faculty get external funding and not used as a main source of funding.
ELIGIBILITY
1.
Only full-time faculty of the Aga Khan University across all campuses.
2.
If a PI has an active grant (seed money or external), he/she may apply for an additional grant
provided it has the potential to enhance significantly the scope of the existing study.
3.
A PI can re-apply for URC grant funding provided ONE YEAR has passed since the completion of
the previously approved URC funded project. However, the track record of the PI would be a
consideration when applying for a new URC grant and the completed project would have been
evaluated for quality of research in terms of publications and presentations generated.
4.
Students cannot apply for URC funding. However, if they wish to be involved in a project that
allows them to learn various techniques of investigations, they will be designated as ‘Trainee
Investigators’. AKU PhD students who are working under the supervision of faculty are also not
eligible to apply as principal investigator (PI).
5.
Non full-time faculty cannot apply as PI, but may participate as Co-investigator with an AKU fulltime faculty as PI.
6.
Involvement of faculty in projects as “co-investigators” should be clearly time defined, in terms of
percentage of time that each co-investigator will spend on the project.
7.
Applications that get unsatisfactory review from both the reviewers i.e. a score of less than two will
not be discussed in the main GRC meeting and Research Office will pre-screen these grant
applications.
8.
Re-submissions that require major changes (defined as major adjustments of study objectives,
methodology, budget, etc) will be reconsidered in the next grant review cycle. However, resubmissions with requests for minor changes (defined as clarifications, minor adjustments of study
procedures, budget etc) will be dealt by the Research Office, in conjunction with the Dean of
Research/Chair of URC.
9.
Small travel grants should be applied through sources other than URC, for example, respective
School’s Dean’s fund, FDA, departmental funds etc.
10.
Funding of Registries and Tissue Banks: URC will not fund any application(s) to set up individual
registries and tissue banks. Such request should be directed to the CIO’s Office for consideration.
(URC Minutes: September 12, 2013)
2
TYPES AND CATEGORIES OF SUPPORT
The URC will consider the following categories of support:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Short term projects proposed by individual faculty.
Theme-related projects initiated by multi-disciplinary faculty teams.
Equipment required for specific projects.
Development of personnel for research at the University.
Cost related to participation of graduate students in research.
Dissemination of the reports of research, including publication.
Capacity Building grants.
Category 1 - Short term projects


Requests for support needed to complete a particularly significant project so that external
awards may be sought (bridge fund).
Short-term support for a pilot project.
Projects in this category may receive funding up to US $ 15,000
Category 2 - Multi-Disciplinary projects
Preference will be given to multi-disciplinary and collaborative applications.
The URC will fund several such projects per year. Funding for such projects will be considered
in every cycle .
Projects in this category may receive maximum funding of US $ 25,000
Graduate Student
Supervisors may apply for limited funds to support graduate students research project.
However, before applying for this Fund, it needs to be verified that the same projects are not covered by
the provision of some specific funds or grants through their respective departments/programmes.
Projects in this category may receive maximum funding of US$ 3,000
Format of application Categories 1 and 2
The following should be included with each application:
1.
2.
3.
Application form (Use URC Grant application Form RGA 10. Do not substitute).
Budget sheet (Use budget Form RGA 10-B. Do not substitute).
Budget Justification, itemized (page 7).
3
4.
Summary statement of proposed research, describing (a) its significance in your field, (b)
how the results could enhance the potential for obtaining external grants, or provide the
basis for larger grant applications.
5.
Project description, background and plan of research.
i.
The research plan should be organized into the following sections:
a)
b)
c)
ii.
Objectives and hypothesis: This should be in outline form, with the objectives
stated for the period of this project only.
Background and Rationale: This should be a brief, critical review of the context of
the proposal, evaluating current knowledge in the field. The bibliography should
cite only the most relevant references. A multi-disciplinary committee, including
people from outside your field of expertise should be able to understand why this
research is important.
Methods: Provide sufficient detail for the committee to assess your understanding
of the experimental design, specific procedures, justification of sample size and
methods of data analysis.
Concise proposals with clearly defined goals and plans that are feasible within the time
period of the award tend to receive the most favourable reviews. However, for bridgefunds should summarize the objectives and outcomes of the research conducted to date
and the purpose to be served by bridge-funding.
Note:
Proposals should be in typescript “Times New Roman 12 pt”, preferably
single line spacing. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed.
6.
State the history of funded research and publication during the past 5 years (Use URC
Funding History Form. Do not substitute).
7.
The PI, Co-PIs and collaborators must submit a short CV (1 page each) and a list of relevant
publications (1 page). Co-PIs and collaborators should include a signed letter stating
willingness to co-operate and the extent of their involvement.
For multi-disciplinary, multi-investigator projects: The roles of investigator or group should
be stated.
9.
Appendices: These should include information critical for evaluating the proposal. They
should be numbered consecutively.
Category 3 - Format of application for capital equipment
Requests for new equipment required to support a research project or programme may be made
independently. Such requests should not be conditionally or unconditionally linked to any other
proposal submitted to URC in the same cycle. However, requests for replacement or upgrading
of equipment to be utilized in a URC funded project can be submitted to the review committee.
Support for equipment is considered only in the context of the needs of a proposed research
4
project, where equipment needs are clearly indicated by the proposed methodology. All requests
for equipment should be submitted on Form E-10, available from the Research Office.
Total or partial support of up to a maximum of US$ 25,000 may be awarded for the
purchase of equipment.
Category 4 - Training and development grants
Grants for the training of personnel for specific needs related to research projects will also be
considered. Applications may be made on Form T-10. Such applications must be accompanied
by a detailed description of the training, and its relationship to existing or future research
projects.
Support for this purpose will be available for brief training periods, not exceeding 4 weeks,
either in Pakistan or abroad.
A maximum of US$ 6000 may be provided for such activity.
Category 5 - Cost related to participation of graduate student in research
Requests for student’s research related costs should be made on Form S-10. Graduate students
should be enrolled in an AKU programme. Applications in this category should be submitted by
their supervisors as PI, for research projects or any research-related training for students enrolled
in graduate programmes of AKU.
Category 6 - Dissemination of research reports and publication costs
URC may consider application to support cost of publication of research papers as well as costs
related to the dissemination of research reports. Individuals seeking such support should submit
a written application describing the nature of work, name of publishing journal or agency and
total associated cost.
Category 7 - Capacity Building Grants
Introduction
In addition to the existing categories of URC grants available to researchers, the URC has
introduced a new category of grant for capacity building. Capacity-building projects could be
multidimensional and may involve training those who participate in all aspects of the research
field. The URC had desired that a list of projects (by types) to be considered under this category
be compiled in consultation with AKU-FHS and AKU-IED. Accordingly, this paper proposes
that the following types of grants to be made available from 2003 onwards:
5
1.
Partnership Building Grants
Objectives

To stimulate new or further strengthen international co-operation between AKU
researchers and institutes from developed and developing countries.

To provide access to knowledge and skills; innovative and proven methodologies;
networking and enhancement of resources.
Grants will be available for the establishment of new contacts directed at longterm collaboration between AKU, AKDN and other national and international
institutions where objectives would be to collaborate and exchange expertise
in research and development of research programme proposals to be submitted
for financing to external agencies.
2.
Development of Human Resources
Objectives



To develop research skills in individuals by organizing short training that enables
them to perform effectively.
To provide opportunities at home and abroad for developing expertise in specific
techniques, including epidemiological and laboratory based, which would
significantly support educational, biosocial and health research.
To develop grant-writing skills by organising workshops on the same. Grantwriting workshops can expand research activity at AKU by helping to lift
standards of internal peer review, and stimulate attention to the requirements of
granting agencies, thereby increasing the chances of success.
Research proposals, which are aimed to develop individuals or groups (students, staff or
faculty), with specific research skills needed to undertake programme projects may be
considered under this category. Training programmes could be directed to raise the level
of understanding of qualitative and quantitative research. Individuals within university or
in a community who could play a facilitatory role in conducting research in the
community may also be developed.
3.
Research Administration and Organizational Development
Objectives




To develop research management skills among researchers by providing
opportunities through direct exposure or allowing access to offshore training
programmes.
To train individuals with aptitude on research management by specifically
designed programmes for this purpose.
To develop research managers in the managerial dimension of research, including
skills in such areas as risk analysis, priority setting, planning, budgeting, human
relations, teambuilding, and developing incentives and rewards.
To develop individual units for the purpose of providing specific service or
assistance in research.
Proposals in this sub-category could include well-defined programmes to develop
individuals who could meaningfully contribute in research planning covering all aspects
6
(proposal development and execution) and monitoring and evaluation. Organizational
development may require creation of new units within or outside AKU with sufficient
ability to survive once the grant support is exhausted.
4.
Development of Resources (research material)
Objectives



To create repository of material to be utilized by the researchers at AKU to study
specific disease or situation in a community.
To develop creative material or tool for the researchers which enable them to
carry out further research in a specific area.
To subscribe for / purchase of special journals, literature, internet based research
resources/tools which cannot normally be financed from departmental funds.
Proposals that aim to develop repositories of resource material such as cancer data bank,
microbial culture collection could be considered. Programmes aimed to develop specific
tools in research such as software and other training material could also be included.
BUDGET GUIDELINES
Request the minimum amount of funds that will allow you to conduct the research. Enter only
whole dollars or rupees on the Budget Form (Form RGA-10B, to be developed with the help of
Budget & Finance). For the budget justification page, itemize the budget request and justify
each item clearly. Please provide an explanation if you have other internal or external funding.
Allowable expenses vary depending on the project. Salary for the PI is not an allowable expense.
The following is a general guideline:
1. Consumables and supplies: Support is provided for consumables and supplies related to
equipment, office stationery, data processing; animal costs and animal maintenance;
unavoidable cost involving human subjects; and unusual computer time requirements.
2. Stipends: Research fellows or graduate students who are involved in approved research and
registered at AKU may be eligible to receive a stipend.
3. Postdoctoral fellows, Research Assistants and Technicians: Salaries may be requested to
support postdoctoral fellows, research assistants in all disciplines and technicians in Basic
and Clinical Sciences. A request for fringe benefits may be included, where applicable.
4. Travel: Travel will be considered when it is essential to achieve project goals. The nature of
the travel must be clearly explained in the proposal. In extraordinary circumstances, other
travel may be supported.
5. Equipment: Although the URC discourages funding equipment in its grants, applicants may
include up to US$8,000 in the budget for equipment. This must be justified on the basis of a
specific need defined in the research proposal. All consumables/ supplies required to run the
equipment for experimental purposes must be included under the list of consumables for the
7
research project. The total cost of equipment should include handling charges freight and
accessories. As this is a University funded item the equipment must be utilized with utmost
care and returned after the expiry of the grant in good working condition except for normal
wear and tear compatible to careful use. The URC will allow other eligible grantees to use
the same equipment hence it reserves the right to provide used equipment to the grantees as
long as it can satisfy the needs of project.
6. Dissemination cost: Written application should include support cost of publication of
research papers as well as cost related to the dissemination of research reports.
REVIEW OF GRANT APPLICATION
All grant applications will be reviewed in two stages. In stage I, review will occur in the relevant
subcommittee of the Grants Review Committee (GRC) (e.g. a basic science project will be
reviewed in the basic science sub-committee; an education related project in the subcommittee
for education). These reviews will then be forwarded to the full GRC for the second stage of the
review process. Proposals submitted to URC will be reviewed by the GRC with external
reviewers as required. Proposals will be sent for external review if deemed necessary by the
GRC.
The chance of a PI being funded for more than one project, proposed simultaneously, is small.
A PI may apply during the same competition period for one single investigator grant and one
multi-disciplinary grant. If both applications are successful, the applicant must accept the multidisciplinary grant and decline the single investigator grant.
Review Criteria for Research Grant Proposal to URC
When preparing an application, please consider the following criteria that will be used to
evaluate all University research fund proposals.
1. Factors related to the proposal
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Clear statement of the procedures to be used to achieve the objectives
Intrinsic value of research
Utility, relevance and potential of research
Potential for future support
Budget, well thought out; clearly defined
2. Factors related to the Investigator
i. Research history competence
ii. Experience
iii. Knowledge of project subject
End of Page
8