Political Science Graduate Student Workshop (PSGW) The First Professional Workshop: Creating Attractive and Effective CVs Speakers: Professor Melanie Manion, Alice Kang, and Stephan Lavertu Date: February 26, 2010 Professor Melanie Manion : You can call it Vita or Curriculum Vitae (make sure put “e” here) and there are five components of CV 1. Strategy: CV is a strategy document that signals how you want to be perceived, the word choice and its order of contents should be strategic. 2. Truthfulness: it should present facts, but in a strategic way. 3. Clarity: it communicates clearly, and your word choice is extremely important for clarity – formatting clearly and make your CV clearly (stylish) For instance, project assistance vs. research assistant: the outside word uses the latter one. 4. Obsession: obsession is better than overlooking obsessiveness, you want “natural” but contrive over natural Using bold, cap, font, underline – everything should be strategically used Need to use a decent paper, but not the thick one that aren’t folded Default font: Times New Roman or Calibri – Melanie loves Calibri (it is clear and looks good) – Times New Roman is more like “soft down” and “academic” – Garamond is like signaling that you think about it too much (in her opinion) 5. Actual Activities: this determines your job Publication: extremely important – if you don’t have it, put conference paper – it signals you are part of the scholar world Prestigious awards: it signals someone is back on you and your work is worthy Prestigious school: we don’t need to worry about it because UW-Madison is fine. Dissertation topic, Method or language skills : Every CV is tailored differently, depend on what you want to emphasize : She believes that it should not over 2-pages : Make sure to place your signal (what you want to emphasize) early in the page 1 Political Science Graduate Student Workshop (PSGW) Alice As a comparativist, she put her previous experience early in the page (ex) Peace Corse Your CV can be a reflection of model CVs: she found and looked others’ CVs from other institution (for the women’s study, she looked up one professor in MN & for the African study, she looked up others in other universities) By doing this, you can see what kinds of work she needs to follow, what kinds of journals she needs to aim at, etc. Feedback is important: asking comments from your committee members and her sister who is a graphic designer helped her too Title of Dissertation: her peer in a writing group helped her to get a tailored title Synopsis of your dissertation: 200 words in the first papge Stephan His CVs was 4-pages long although the final page is about reference (committee members’ contact information) He used Times New Roman because he wants to “soft down” the methodology (he wants to emphasize his “policy” interest and strength more than methodology) – Method people never use Times New Roman He put his publication in the second page because he wants to emphasize his teaching and research strengths: here, Melanie and Alice disagree – they believe publications is the most important one that must be in the first page Q&A If you present the same paper in two different conferences, write like: “Title,” presented in MPSA and SWPA Stick with one CV: Both Alice and Stephan did not change their CVs for every time they apply – instead, they changed the “research/teaching” sections & The most important part is your cover letter: here, you can put the information that fits to your applied school, so doesn’t need to change your CVs every single time. Put your working papers: they can see your interests & “under review” and “revise and resubmitted” are important 2 Political Science Graduate Student Workshop (PSGW) Put better stuffs first!!!! Don’t put “book review” at the top in the publication. No explanation necessary for Awards or grants: For instance, Meina got NSF and Villas Travel Grant in 2009 – absolutely, NSF is so important – then, put it at top!!!!! Don’t go back too far: no information about your undergraduate – just put “summa cum laude” or something under Education, put your undergraduate scholarship information under EDU Put your committee members and indicating who is a chair is a good idea: if you put reference who is outside of UW-Madison, it can be appealing too sometimes – might get a question like “how do you know this person” in the interview NO TYPO !!!!!!!! NEVER EVER Melanie doesn’t like indentation, she prefers “.” 3