Figure S2. WRMS reduction ratio for GPS stations in the Amazon Basin; circles denote the results for the north component, and diamonds are for the east component, and triangles are for the vertical component. This figure indicates that the correlations of horizontal seasonal variations between GPS and GRACE depend on their relative locations to the load. For the GPS stations located west and east of the load, such as QUI1, QUI2, RIOP, RECF, BRAZ, and SAVO, the correlation is good in the east direction (diamond) and poor in the north direction (circle). This is because their horizontal seasonal movements are mainly in the east-west direction. For the stations on the south side of the load, such as UFPR, CHPI and UEPF, the correlations in the north component (circle) are much better than those in the east component (diamond). Triangle denotes WRMS reduction in height. WRMS (Weighted Root-Mean-Squares) reduction ratio was defined by [Fu et al., 2012] to assess the correlations between GPS measured and GRACE modeled seasonal deformation. ππ πππΊππ − ππ πππΊππ−πΊπ π΄πΆπΈ π ππ‘ππππ ππ_π πππ’ππ‘πππ = ππ πππΊππ − ππ πππΊππ−πΊπππππ‘ where ππ πππΊππ is the WRMS of the GPS seasonal (detrended) timeseries; ππ πππΊππ−πΊπ π΄πΆπΈ is the WRMS of the GPS timeseries with seasonal effects corrected by GRACE-modeled seasonal displacements; ππ πππΊππ−πΊπππππ‘ is the WRMS of the GPS timeseries with seasonal components removed by fitting seasonal terms to the GPS timeseries. A value of +1.0 would represent perfect agreement between GPS-observed and GRACE-modeled seasonal deformation. So higher WRMS reduction ratio represents better correlation between GPS and GRACE. Reference: Fu, Y., J. T. Freymueller, and T. Jensen (2012), Seasonal hydrological loading in southern Alaska observed by GPS and GRACE, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L15310, doi:10.1029/2012GL052453.