Monday, July 28 Final Schedule 3:00 PM: Arrival and check-in 5:30-6:30 Dinner-Café 6:30-7:30 Opening Remarks Room: No set program during dinner hour Welcome: Marcia McCaffrey, Pres. SEADAE & David Dik, Executive Director, Young Audiences Arts for Learning Guest: Ayanna Hudson, Director of Arts Education, National Endowment for the Arts Tuesday, July 29 7:00-8:00 Breakfast – Dining Hall 8:15-9:00 Space 1-Clover Marcia McCaffrey Cory Wilkerson Lynn Tuttle Presenters can check out their space beginning at 7:00 AM Opening Plenary Overview of the National Arts Assessment Institute Institute Goals and Objectives Institute Design—designing your day Exit cards Brief introduction to the sessions Issues & Solutions in Arts Assessment 9:10-10:10 10:10-10:30 10:30-11:30 Space 1-Clover A Session A Delaware Teacher Eval Space 2-Clover B Session B Pennsylvania: SLO’s Break Session D (one time) Michigan: Item Development with Break Session E Colorado: Assessment Bank and Keynote: Dr. Tim Brophy A Declaration of Interdependence: A Facets Model for State Arts Assessment Leadership Arts Assessment Literacy Space 3-Iowa A Session C Ryan Fisher: Portfolio Evaluation Break Session F (one time) Beth Cummings: Florida Music Assessment Space 4-Iowa B Top 10 Reasons Not to Assess in the Arts (Shuler) Break Dr. Shuler, continued (ending time TDB) Ana Cardona and friends Curriculum Development Session H (one time) Dr. Brophy: Item Response Theory for MCA’s Session I South Carolina: SCAAP Reporting and Analyzing Assessment Results Brief History of Arts Assessment and Learning the Lingo (Frank Philip, McCaffrey and friends) 12:45-1:30 1:40-2:40 Session G Connecticut: Common Performance Assessment Lunch – Dining Hall Session A (Delaware) Session B (PA) Session I (SC) Session J: Young Audiences Arts for Learning: A 2:50-3:50 Session G (CT) Session E (CO) Session C (Portfolio) 3:50-4:10 4:15-5:30 Break Break Break Break All Attendees: Open Space Technology (modified) Spaces identified spontaneously by groups (Optional--Connecting with the NE Summit on Arts Education, Arts Assessment Institute in Portland, ME—virtual Q & A) End day #1 and Dinner – Dining Hall Planning Team Debrief fine tune presentations for Wednesday based on Tuesday’s discoveries o discuss outcomes from Open Space o go over exit cards and plan for panel discussion 11:40-12:40 Case Study Approach to Formative Assessment 4:15-4:45 5:30-7:30 7:30-9:30 PM Session J (Formative Assessment) Wednesday, July 30 7:00-8:15 8:30-9:45 Panel of “Exits” Breakfast – Dining Hall Space 1-Clover Panelist will be identified from among the presenters to address issues that were identified from participant exit cards. Space 1-Clover A Space 2 – Clover B Space 3 – Iowa A Space 4 – Iowa B 10:00-11:45 Deep Dive Topic 1: Teacher Evaluation 12:00-12:45 Lunch: Roundtable discussion topics/poster presentation (TBD) – Dining Hall 1:00-2:15 2:30-3:30 Open Space Technology (modified)—Spaces identified spontaneously by groups Space 1-Clover Closing Plenary with Dr. Tim Brophy-Resident Expert Follow-up Survey Exit Cards Thank-you’s Topic 2: Item Development Topic 3: Performance Topic 4: National Core Arts Assessment Standards—state adoption and Model Cornerstone Assessments Issues and Solutions in Arts Assessment Sessions (Tuesday) Session A Delaware: Teacher Evaluation with Deb Hanson Session B Pennsylvania: SLO’s with David Dietz and Cory Wilkerson Session C Portfolio Teacher Evaluation with Ryan Fisher Session D (offered 1x) Michigan: Item Development with Ana Cardona and friends Session E Colorado: Assessment Bank and Curriculum Development with Karol Gates and friend Florida Music Assessment with Beth Cummings Session F (offered 1x) Session G Connecticut: Performance Assessment with Scott Shuler Session H (offered 1x) Session I Dr. Brophy: Item Response Theory Session J Young Audiences Arts for Learning: A Case Study Approach South Carolina: SCAAP Reporting and Analyzing Assessment Results with Scot Hockman to Formative Assessment Deep Dive Topics (Wednesday) Deep Dive 1: Teacher Evaluation/SLO’s Deep Dive 2: Item Development Deep Dive 3: Performance Assessment Deep Dive 4: National Core Arts Standards state adoption and MCA’s Experts Dive 1: Deitz; Hansen; Wilkerson Experts Dive 2: Schmid; Cardona; Cummings; Experts Dive 3: Shuler; Young Audiences; Fisher Experts Dive 4: Sabol; Tuttle Open Space Technology Resources: http://www.openspaceworld.com/users_guide.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology http://www.openspaceworld.org/cgi/wiki.cgi?AboutOpenSpace Presenter Guidelines for Tuesday Sessions (Focus on Issues and Solutions): Assumption—“From complex projects come unexpected issues. Identifying the issues and resolving them create unique learning experiences. How might others learn from your experience?” 1. Identify the “project or topic” 2. Identify the major components of the project including any research-based models (e.g. Danielson, Marzano, McRel, Goh, Darling-Hammond) 3. Clearly identify issues that arose in the course of the project. Discuss what happened—when were the issues identified; what solutions were considered and why; what actions were taken. 4. Discuss results—so how did it work out? What happened? 5. Lessons-learned: Here’s what you might want to think and know about to avoid this issue. (#5 is the big take-away for this presentation) 6. Leave time for exit cards at the end. Remind people that the Panel, Open Space Technology and Deep Dives will be an opportunity to go more deeply into the topic and address people’s questions. Exit cards should capture attendee’s questions, need-to-knows, and requests for deeper learning. Exit Cards: As each session comes to a close, participants will be asked to complete exit cards which will be collected and sorted. The exit cards will be used in formative ways to customize the institute to the various learning needs of attendees. Your exit card is based on this prompt: Please write down one question, idea, or a-ha based on the presentation you just attended or based on the culmination of information you’ve learned or on thoughts that keep rolling around in your head that are assessment-driven. Your responses should help organizers better prepare tomorrow’s content to meet your needs.