Online data supplement Exhaled nitric oxide thresholds to predict sputum eosinophil count ≥3% in a cohort of unselected asthmatics F. Schleich1, L. Seidel3, J. Sele1, M. Manise1, V. Quaedvlieg1, A. Michils², R. Louis1 1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liege, I3 GIGA research group, University of Liege, Belgium, ²Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasme Hospital University of Brussels, 3Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, University of Liege, Belgium. Statistical methods We applied logistic regression analysis to the data. The binary outcome variable was Sputum eosinophil count (SEC) (below or above 3%). Covariates included FENO (log-transform), age, gender, smoking, ICS, and atopy. Since the group of 295 patients may be considered as a representative sample of the population of asthmatic patients attending a University Clinic, the proportion of subjects with sputum eosinophil count 3%, namely 42.3%, is an unbiased estimate of the true proportion in the population. It follows that the linear combination of covariates, the so-called risk index R, obtained by logistic regression analysis can be used to calculate the probability of Sputum eosinophil count 3%. The equation writes Pr SEC 3% R eR 1 e R The value R=0 can be used to determine cut-off point on the FENO scale. Given that Pr(SEC≥3%/R)=0.5, 0.5= e R/ (1+eR). 0.5 + 0.5eR = eR, eR=1 and R=0. For example, using ln(FENO) as single covariate in the logistic model, we obtained R 4.47 1.1933 ln FE NO , which yields a cut-off point equal to 42 ppb on the FENO scale. When including smoking into the model, we obtained R 4.83 1.2608 ln FE NO 0.6564 smoking , where the p-value for smoking was 0.066 (NS). By equating R to 0 for smokers (smoking=1) and non-smokers (smoking=0), the cut-off points were 27 ppb and 46 ppb, respectively. The difference between the two cut-off points however is not statistically different (p= 0.066). The same approach was used for age, gender, ICS and atopy. For ICS, it appeared that only the last category (dose > 1000 µg/d beclomethasone) was significant. This led us to define a new binary ICS variable ( 1000 or > 1000 µg/d) which turned out to be significant when combined to FENO. Age and gender were not contributing significantly to the predictive value of FENO. By contrast, we found that atopy had an effect on the slope of ln(FENO) in the logistic model, not on the intercept. When combining all variables into the logistic model, we found that only FENO (p<0.0001), smoking (p=0.044) and ICS (p=0.019) were significant predictors of Sputum eosinophil count 3 %. When adding atopy, the p-value was not significant although a tendency was observed (p=0.086). Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) however reached a minimum for this model. We therefore decided to keep also this covariate in the model. Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Estimate Standard error Wald Chi-Square Pr>ChiSq FENO Intercept -4.47 0.60 56.00 <0.0001 Ln FENO 1.19 0.16 52.75 <0.0001 FENO and Intercept -4.83 0.65 55.82 <0.0001 Smoking Ln FENO 1.26 0.17 53.37 <0.0001 Smoking 0.66 0.36 3.38 0.066 FENO and Intercept -4.94 0.65 57.94 <0.0001 High Doses of Ln FENO 1.28 0.17 55.44 <0.0001 ICS High doses ICS 0.72 0.33 4.80 0.028 FENO and Ln Intercept -4.69 0.62 57.01 <0.0001 FENO *Atopy Ln FENO 1.38 0.20 49.14 <0.0001 LnFENO*Atopy -0.18 0.09 3.85 <0.050 FENO and Intercept -5.50 0.72 58.95 <0.0001 smoking and Ln FENO 1.52 0.21 53.05 <0.0001 High Doses of Smoking 0.75 0.36 4.17 0.041 ICS and Ln High Doses ICS 0.69 0.34 4.28 0.032 FENO *Atopy LnFENO*Atopy -0.16 0.09 2.95 0.086