Fraternity and Sorority Legislative Agenda Focuses on Ensuring Safe College Campuses
The North-American Interfraternity Conference (NIC) and the National Panhellenic Conference (NPC)
remain united in fighting against sexual violence. We believe one assault is too many. And we are
committed to protecting the safety and rights of all students, whether it is a student whose assaulter
goes unpunished; a student who lacks meaningful access to the support services needed to report and
recover; a student who misses the education needed to intervene to prevent an assault; a student who
fears the stigma of identifying as being affected by sexual violence; or a student who faces an
adjudication process that is not fair and transparent to all involved parties.
We fully understand and support campuses acting swiftly on behalf of a student victim affected by sexual
violence. We are dedicated to supporting a student’s rights – whether or not he or she belongs to a
fraternity or sorority. We also fully support the student’s right to choose his or her course of justice.
Because we view sexual violence as such a severe and heinous crime, we believe the involvement of law
enforcement plays a crucial role to finding a resolution when a report is submitted. We recognize that a
case may advance through the court system, but many times a case will be handed back to campus to
investigate and adjudicate. To that end, we insist that the standard of evidence be determined by the
campus.
We also acknowledge that campus officials are under tremendous pressure to adhere to federal
regulations and must adhere to strict guidelines as part of the adjudication process. Some schools have
limited tools and resources at their disposal, and therefore we empathize with campus officials who feel
obligated to adjudicate serious claims of sexual violence and criminal activity. We believe in fairness
provided to all parties during the adjudication process and insist on due process for every student and
every student organization involved with a sexual assault report.
In cases of sexual violence, we advocate for interim measures to keep potential threats to students from
being on campus and measures to help encourage student victims to continue to come forward without
the fear of an entire community being punished by the campus administration. We fully recognize that
our campus colleagues are essential to helping provide appropriate support resources.
NIC and NPC are proposing a SAFE CAMPUS for all students and are dedicated to working with other
parties to eradicate deplorable acts of sexual violence.
NIC and NPC Views on Campus Sexual Violence: Myth vs. Fact
The North-American Interfraternity Conference and the National Panhellenic Conference are advancing
a legislative agenda intended to enhance safety on college and university campuses.
In order to ensure clarity around our collective position, we have prepared the following “Myth vs. Fact”
summary to explain our viewpoint.
Myth: NIC and NPC are lobbying Congress to make it harder to bring justice to students who commit
crimes of sexual violence.
Fact: Sexual violence is a crime, and the policy changes we advocate will make campuses safer by
providing a clear path for pursuing those who commit such crimes against students. The NIC and NPC
believe that institutions of higher education (IHEs) play a critical role when a student victim brings
forward an allegation regarding sexual violence on campus:
Specifically, the organizations believe:

One Assault is One Too Many. Sexual violence in any form, in any setting is unacceptable.
Students affected by sexual violence must have immediate access to appropriate university
resources, including confidential counseling and related services, to protect their physical,
emotional and educational well-being. Campus professionals assume a valuable role in providing
the necessary support.

Right to Control. Student victims have a right to choose whether their cases are investigated
and adjudicated by an IHE or the local police. Student privacy is paramount. If an affected
student wishes only to avail themselves of confidential institutional services to protect their
physical, emotional and educational well-being, they must be able to do so.

Sexual Violence Referrals. If a student victim seeks a police investigation, the IHE should refer
allegations to local law enforcement agencies within 48 hours of receiving notice of the
allegation. If it is determined an allegation does not necessitate criminal charges, the IHE retains
primary responsibility for resolving such disputes under their student codes of conduct.
Allegations of sexual taunting or unwanted sexual advances, similar to those sometimes
addressed using Title VII in the workplace, can and should be adjudicated by IHEs.

Interim Measures. While police investigate cases of sexual assault the IHE can implement
interim measures – including adjustments to class schedules, university housing or even
temporary suspensions – to protect the affected students and the university community.
However, deeper IHE investigations of the alleged assault should be postponed while police are
investigating.

Role of Law Enforcement. We believe law enforcement should be involved in the investigation
of college-based sexual assault claims – unless the student victim asks the college administrators
not to involve the police. Local law enforcement agencies are equipped and most appropriate
institutions to investigate and help advance cases through the legal system in order to prosecute
serious crimes of violence against students. The benefit of law enforcement involvement is that
agencies have access to forensic, investigative and related resources to ensure justice for all
parties.
Myth: Because IHE have a duty of care to provide for their students’ welfare, there is no need to involve
law enforcement in allegations of sexual violence and sexual misconduct.
Fact: We draw an important distinction between crimes and acts of sexual misconduct in terms of where
primary jurisdiction for investigation and adjudication should reside. Sexual assault is viewed as a
serious crime. Delegating investigation of sexual assault reports to local law enforcement helps alleviate
the tremendous pressures for campus officials to follow Title IX procedures and adhere to strict federal
guidelines. Procedures may be challenged, and the potential for complaints weigh heavy on our campus
professionals. When complaints are filed with the Office of Civil Rights, universities are potentially faced
with fines and reputational risks that impact many other areas. For this reason, there is benefit to
involving law enforcement in allegations if the student victim chooses that path for justice. Many IHEs
have limited resources and those resources may be directed toward education, support, recovery and
prevention of sexual violence.
When IHEs do handle allegations of sexual misconduct, we advocate for the following principles:

Preserving Victim Rights. Campus safety is the priority and an IHE has little to no control over
the larger community and may not be able to keep students found guilty under their judicial
process off of campus grounds. If an assailant is convicted within the criminal justice system, he
or she will be punished according to the law and will likely be removed from the community.
If/when he (or she) is released from prison they may also be placed on the Sex Offenders
National Registry, which could do more to protect the current community or any other
collegiate community from repeat offenders. To reiterate, interim measures must be in place to
protect students affected by sexual violence.

Procedural Fairness. IHEs strive to provide a fair and transparent system for students affected
by sexual violence. Procedural fairness requires the campus to provide access to the best
resources for investigating an allegation, adjudicating a claim against a student and providing
confidential services to the affected students. No single campus official should play more than
one role as confidential advisor, investigator, prosecutor, judge or jury.

Due Process Protections. Students accused of an act of sexual violence must have access to due
process protections in the campus investigation and adjudication system because ramifications
of a violation – including expulsion – carry lifetime consequences. All students affected by sexual
violence should have:

The right to full representation, at their own expense, by an attorney or non-attorney
counsel throughout the pre-hearing and hearing process;

The right to adequate notice regarding all claims subject to the proceeding;

The right to adequate access to material evidence before a proceeding takes place; and

The right to appropriate questioning of witnesses in a safe manner for all parties.

Standard of Proof. Institutions of higher education are empowered to determine the most
appropriate standard of evidence in adjudicating allegations regarding sexual violence.
Myth: The NIC and NPC are lobbying Congress to prevent IHEs from punishing student organizations,
including fraternities and sororities, when a member or members affiliated with that organization are
accused of violating campus rules.
Fact: The NIC and NPC believe that IHEs maintain the primary role in enforcing campus rules, disciplining
students and ensuring that student organizations, including fraternities and sororities, abide by campus
rules. Student organizations should have the same due process rights as an accused student when an
institution attempts to punish an organization for alleged misconduct. Punishing student members of
organizations for misconduct committed by members of other student organizations compromises the
rights of individual students. Mass suspensions of student organizations like fraternities and sororities
without notice and due process violate a student's freedom of association and Title IX rights. NIC and
NPC will lobby to protect organizational rights to due process.