Engineering Failures Introduction Ethics is generally defined as the study of morals, which is the study of what is right and wrong or beneficial or harmful to others. In the field of engineering and science, it is a very important concept that is considered in the daily workings of engineers and scientists. The codes of professional engineers and scientists vary widely within different professional societies. Many professional societies maintain a set of codes, such as the American Institute of Chemists, the American Mathematical Society, the Association of Computer Machinery, and the American Council of Engineering Companies. These codes of conductor ethical guidelines are used to govern the practices of the engineers, engineering technicians, scientist, and mathematicians. Sometimes the codes are extensive and may even result in a person losing his/her advanced degree if he/she is found to plagiarize his/her work. You may be surprised to learn that there is also a set of codes for student organizations that includes a Hippocratic Oath for scientists, engineers, and executives. This problem is designed to enable you to learn more about engineering design ethics and how ethics should play a role in the work of engineers and scientists. Problem Statement Over the course of human history, there have been hundreds of thousands of engineering blunders, large and small. A few that come to mind are the Titanic, the Challenger Shuttle, and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. Outcomes You will select a category of potential ethical issues. Within that category, you will research a particular case and study the ethical issues encountered. You do not have to focus your research on a particular situation, such as stem cell research, but you may research the ethics surrounding such an issue. Make sure the project you choose is approved by Mr. Hill before you start. These are PLTW ideas. The paper must be related to engineering design and ethics. CATEGORY Agricultural and Food Biotech Business Ethics Campaign Ethics Character Education Environmental Ethics Ethical Theory Ethics Centers and Institutes Foundations Global Leadership and Ethics Government Ethics Health Care Ethics Legal Ethics Media Ethics Non-profits Public Policy Religious Perspectives on Ethics Science and Research Ethics Supranational Organizations Technology and Biotechnology United Nations Organizations University-Affiliated Groups SAMPLE ETHICAL TOPICS Trench Failure Anhydrous Ammonia Hose Failure Conflict of interest Whistle blowing Good engineer vs. protecting the environment Three Mile Island Nuclear Disaster Gift Giving or Receiving General research regarding different groups and opinions Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse Encryption and national security The Aberdeen Three and chemical weapons Designer medicines What is plagiarism? What is cheating? Equal justice under the Law. TV Antenna Collapse Research ethical issues with groups, such as Greenpeace and CARE Ultra-lightweight Vehicles, WIG’s or other vehicles that present policy issues. General research regarding different points of view Challenger Disaster The World Bank or The World Health Organization Biopharma Issues Research on third-world peasant farmers in cultivating their small plots of land General research regarding different points of view, such as conflict of interest What you must include: Who made the failed design What went wrong with the design Why the blunder was made A description of the event What was changed after the disaster to make a successful design The ethics behind what went wrong (who was in charge of the project, why they thought they could get away with the project, etc). The report must include images, and each student must use at least three sources, at least one of which can NOT be a website. Must be in APA format (and include an abstract!) Between 1 and 2 pages (300-700 words) It is critical that you and your partner keep detailed records of your research so that you are able to include the information in the design brief. The research information is critical in that it must be used by the team in order to successfully complete the design brief. Helpful Websites: http://www.matscieng.sunysb.edu/disaster/ http://www.library.ubc.ca/scieng/engineeringfailure/EngFailures.htm http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/sme/failurecases/list_engineering_successes_failures.htm http://listverse.com/2007/12/04/top-10-worst-engineering-disasters/ CATEGORY Amount of Information 4 All topics are addressed and all questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each. Quality of Information Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. Information is very organized with wellconstructed paragraphs and subheadings. Organization Sources All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format. Mechanics No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Paragraph Construction All paragraphs include introductory sentence, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. Diagrams & Illustrations Diagrams and illustrations are neat, accurate and add to the reader's understanding of the topic. Format The entire report follows length guidelines and APA format 3 All topics are addressed and most questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each. Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 12 supporting details and/or examples. 2 All topics are addressed, and most questions answered with 1 sentence about each. 1 One or more topics were not addressed. Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs. Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed. The information appears to be disorganized. 8) All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format. Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format. Some sources are not accurately documented. A few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most paragraphs include introductory sentence, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. Diagrams and illustrations are accurate and add to the reader's understanding of the topic. The report is a little shorter or longer than allotted length. One or two exceptions to format guidelines Paragraphs included related information but were typically not constructed well. Paragraphing structure was not clear and sentences were not typically related within the paragraphs. Diagrams and illustrations are neat and accurate and sometimes add to the reader's understanding of the topic. Allotted length is ignored. Attempt at following APA Guidelines but there are many mistakes. An abstract is not included Diagrams and illustrations are not accurate OR do not add to the reader's understanding of the topic. The report doesn’t meet length guidelines and isn’t in APA format