Discussion paper: proposed changes to financial reporting for providers of residential aged care and home care Introduction The Department seeks the views of residential and home care providers, as well as other stakeholders, on this discussion paper, which outlines the proposed changes to financial and prudential reporting requirements for residential and home care. It is proposed that a Comprehensive Financial Report (CFR) consolidate and replace the current reporting requirements for residential and home care providers. Attached are mock-ups of the proposed reports – there are three versions, of which providers would complete one based on their circumstances – and a document that contains the definitions. Submissions are due by close of business on Friday 27 February 2015. Please provide your comments by email to ffbconsultation@dss.gov.au or by post to: Director, Financial Performance Section Aged Care Policy and Reform Group Department of Social Services PO Box 7576 Canberra Business Centre ACT 2610 Background In January 2014, the Assistant Minister for Social Services asked the Aged Care Financing Authority (ACFA) to provide advice on options to improve the collection of appropriate financial data from aged care providers, including options to rationalise current financial reporting requirements. ACFA’s report Improving the Collection of Financial Data from Aged Care Providers was released on Tuesday 28 October 2014 and is available on the Department's website at https://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/ageing-and-aged-care/aged-care-reform/reforms-bytopic/aged-care-financing-authority. The report recommends that: a new Comprehensive Financial Report (CFR) be introduced to consolidate and replace the General Purpose Financial Report (GPFR), the Annual Prudential Compliance Statement (APCS), the Survey of Aged Care Homes (SACH) and home care Financial Accountability Reports (FAR); the Department form a design and implementation group – including residential and home care providers and representatives from ACFA – to assist in the design of the new CFR; that the new CFR collect income and expenditure information at the service level (i.e. individual facility); the CFR be introduced for optional reporting for residential care providers for the 2014-15 financial year; the CFR be introduced for compulsory reporting for residential and home care providers for the 2015-16 financial year; and Standard Business Reporting (SBR) be adopted over the longer term, post the 2015-16 financial year. On 22 October 2014 the Assistant Minister wrote to Ms Lynda O’Grady, ACFA Chairman, to indicate his support in-principle for the general direction for financial reporting outlined in ACFA’s report, subject to further consultation with the sector. To enable further consultation with the sector and detailed consideration of the implementation process, it is proposed that the CFR would be introduced for compulsory reporting for all residential and home care providers for the 2015-16 financial year. Providers would report on the 2014-15 financial year under the current reporting framework, as set out under the Aged Care Act 1997. The longer term move towards SBR will be the subject of future consultation. The context of ACFA’s recommendations ACFA is an independent statutory committee whose role is to provide independent, transparent advice to the Australian Government on financing and funding issues in the aged care sector. ACFA considers issues in the context of maintaining a viable, accessible and sustainable aged care industry that balances the needs of consumers, providers, the workforce, taxpayers, investors and financiers. In developing its recommendations on financial reporting ACFA recognised the opportunity to both reduce the cost and complexity of financial reporting (evidenced in the recommendations to move to consolidate numerous existing requirements and in the longer term to Standard Business Reporting) and also to improve the quality and usability of financial data to meet the requirements of the sector, ACFA and the Department of Social Services. It noted that the financial information needs to be sufficient to both inform government policy and provide information and analysis to the sector and other stakeholders on industry issues, developments and trends. To meet this need ACFA recommended that certain information also be collected at service level to enable proper analysis of issues affecting the sector at different levels. For example, allowing a better understanding of the operation of individual services in regional, rural and remote locations, and comparison to those in inner regional and metropolitan areas. In addition, the information obtained through the collection of a residential aged care segment balance sheet would give ACFA valuable insights into the investment in and funding of residential aged care. Structure of the Comprehensive Financial Report The new CFR would replace the current reporting framework for residential and home care providers, consolidating the GPFR, the APCS and the SACH completed by providers of residential care, and the FAR completed by providers of home care. This would streamline the 2 current financial reporting events, enabling residential and home care providers to report once annually, submitting the appropriate CFR by 31 October each year. The new CFR would reduce duplication across the current financial and prudential reports, establishing a minimum data set that would be collected from all providers. The Department proposes to introduce three versions of the CFR, and providers would complete one of these reports, depending on their circumstances. The form would be tailored to the provider, depending on the type of aged care they deliver and any other non-aged care related parts of their business. Table 1 sets out the reporting requirements specific to each version of the CFR. The left-hand column lists the three versions of the CFR, while the header row indicates the level of reporting required for each CFR. Table 1 – Structure of the CFRs Statement of Income and Expenses Statement of Financial Position Statement of Cash Flow Notes to the Financial Statements Prudential Standards Building and Investment Activity CFR 1 Provider of home care and other services (excluding residential) CFR 2 Residential care only provider Home care service level N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential care service level Approved provider level Approved provider level Approved provider level Approved provider level Residential care service level CFR 3 Provider of residential care and other services Home care service level (if applicable); residential care service level; and approved provider level Residential care segment level; and approved provider level Approved provider level Approved provider level Approved provider level Residential care service level CFR 1 would be completed by providers who deliver home care (and possibly other services), but not residential care. This is the simplest report, and is very similar to the FAR currently used by home care providers, but with some proposed changes to reflect the introduction of Consumer Directed Care. CFR 2 would be completed by providers who only deliver residential care. This includes a statement of income and expenses to be completed for each residential aged care service, with a statement of financial position (or ‘balance sheet’) completed for the approved provider as a whole. This would also include the cash flow and prudential items currently captured in the APCS, and the questions about building activity from the SACH. 3 CFR 3 would be completed by those providers who deliver residential care and other services, which may include home care and/or another aged care or non-aged care related business (for example, independent living units). CFR 3 would include a statement of income and expenses completed for each residential service and each home care service (if applicable) and for the approved provider as a whole. This would also include a statement of financial position (or ‘balance sheet’) for the residential segment (the overall residential aged care part of the business) and for the approved provider as a whole. CFR 3 would also include the cash flow and prudential items currently captured in the APCS, and the questions about building activity from the SACH. It is envisaged that providers could complete and submit the CFR either on-line or use an Excel file and email it to the Department. Consultation On Friday 21 November 2014, the Department held a targeted design and implementation workshop with residential and home care providers, representatives from the South Australian Innovation Hub, ACFA and industry accounting firms. Workshop participants raised a number of issues, which are reflected in the discussion below. We would like to seek the views of the sector more broadly on these issues. As part of the consultation process, the Department has spoken with a number of software vendors that develop financial software for the aged care sector, and has also spoken with a number of auditors about the proposed changes. The Department is also working closely with a number of home care providers on the issues about reporting for home care packages offered on a CDC basis. Issues Replacing the GPFR with the CFR for the purposes of the Aged Care Act 1997 (the Act). The introduction of the CFR would mean that providers no longer need to submit a GPFR for the purposes of meeting their obligations under the Act. However, the Department notes that some providers may be required to prepare audited GPFRs or Special Purpose Financial Reports (SPFRs) for other purposes. The intention of the CFR is to reduce duplication between the financial statements currently collected under the Act, while streamlining reporting events. A longer term move to Standard Business Reporting1 would further streamline this process. Reporting of data at residential facility level The CFR, as proposed by ACFA, would require providers to complete a Statement of Income and Expenses at the individual residential facility level. As ACFA noted in its report, the 1 Standard Business Reporting (SBR) has been available for use by Australian businesses for financial and payroll reporting since mid–2010. It reduces red-tape by simplifying business reporting to government through the use of harmonised reporting definitions and standardised electronic reporting. SBR is based on the idea that information can be ‘captured once, and used often’ to enhance business efficiency and productivity. SBR works as a by-product of natural business systems, allowing businesses to report through a single online channel to government directly from those systems on a ‘machine to machine’ basis (rather than through a portal), saving time and money and allowing more time for core business activities. 4 majority (63%) of residential care providers are single service facility providers who would effectively be reporting at facility level anyway, while 29% of providers have two to six facilities. It was noted in the workshop that the comparison and analysis of facility level income and expenses data could be problematic, partly because a comparison of facilities (both within a provider and across the sector) would not be able to account for differences in how providers operate their facilities. For example, it was pointed out that larger providers, unlike smaller and single-facility providers, are more likely to have centralised costs which are not allocated to individual facilities. Workshop participants did go on to suggest that where providers did not have established allocation methods for certain items, notional allocations could be made for the purpose of determining the financial performance of facilities. Combining this information with non-financial information such as facility size, layout, location etc. enables a deeper understanding of the operation and viability of facilities and the segment more generally. Allocation of facility income and expenses to care, accommodation and hoteling categories The proposed CFR asks providers to allocate (or apportion appropriately) certain income and expense items between residential care, accommodation and hoteling categories. In the workshop the Department specifically sought providers’ views about whether, for example, the basic daily fee and extra service fee could be allocated or apportioned under ‘accommodation’ or ‘hoteling’ on the income statement. Feedback on this was mixed, with some providers allocating the basic daily fee clearly under hoteling and others not. More general feedback received at the workshop indicated that while allocating or apportioning expense items would not be overly difficult – and a number of providers may already be reporting in this way internally – it is more difficult for income items. Reporting of segment level balance sheet ACFA’s proposed CFR included the collection of a residential care segment balance sheet. Workshop participants advised that entities that operate more than residential care do not disaggregate their balance sheet to segment level, and that to do so would be subjective and arbitrary. However, the information obtained through the collection of a residential aged care segment balance sheet would allow valuable insights into investment in residential aged care and how it is funded. Removal of auditing requirements ACFA’s report recommended that an attestation of compliance replace the current requirement that financial statements submitted to the Department be audited. Workshop participants pointed out that some organisations would choose to have the CFR audited to fulfil their own management obligations, or to give confidence to the boards or staff member attesting to the accuracy of the report. It is proposed that an authorised person from the provider attest to the accuracy and completeness of the CFR. Home care statement of income and expenses The statement of income and expenses included in the CFR presented at the design and implementation workshop was substantially similar to the FAR that home care providers used to report for the 2013-14 financial year. However, a number of issues have been raised about the 5 accounting treatments for home care packages offered on a Consumer Directed Care (CDC) basis. Advice from providers is that they will be recording the Government subsidy and the client contribution as a liability in the balance sheet as they are received. As services are provided this liability would be reduced and income recognised in the statement of income and expenses. It would be difficult to determine the amount of subsidy and client contribution when recognising this income and it is therefore likely that this income will be recognised as a single line item in the statement of income and expenses. The balance of the package would then be reconciled with the outstanding liability on the balance sheet. As such, reporting using a standard statement of income and expenses would not provide the full picture, as the split between subsidies and client fees would not be captured. To account for this, the home care statement of income and expenses in CFRs 1 and 3 has been revised. It now proposes to collect a combination of items from the income and expenses statement and client statements, in order to capture the full income picture. The revised CFRs also propose to collect a small number of additional items from the balance sheet – namely, cash and liquid assets – in order to understand the balance of package liabilities and liquidity. This would enable a better assessment of the viability of the home care sector as it transitions to CDC. Prudential items From the perspective of prudential compliance and regulation, the proposed CFR has been formulated to collect the minimum data set that the Department would be relying on to assess providers’ compliance with their prudential obligations, viability, and use of refundable accommodation deposits. Workshop participants were largely supportive of the changes to reporting requirements at approved provider level, including items in the Statement of Cash flow, adding that further specificity to the Operating and Investing items might be useful. Building activity ACFA’s report recommended that the SACH be discontinued once the CFRs are introduced for mandatory reporting. The SACH module on building activity (Part 2 of the current SACH) will be incorporated as part of the CFRs for residential aged care providers. The 1 July 2014 changes to the accommodation payment arrangements means the previous modules in the SACH are now obsolete. Section A of Part 1 has not been incorporated as part of the CFRs: data on accommodation payments is currently collected as part of the Aged Care Entry Record. Those questions from Section B of Part 1 not already covered off by other parts of the CFRs have been excluded. Comments sought The Department seeks the views of residential and home care providers on these issues, and on the definitions document (Combined Definitions for CFR1, 2, and 3) and detailed data items contained in the CFRs (CFR1 – home care only CDC, CFR 2 – residential care only, and CFR3 – residential care and other). Questions during the consultation period should be directed to ffbconsultation@dss.gov.au. 6