Please see next couple of pages for Scoring Rubrics
ART & ESSAY CONTEST EVALUATION SHEET 2013-2014
Judge Name:
POSTER EVALUATION
Posters
Poster01
Poster02
Poster03
Poster04
Poster05
Poster06
Poster07
Craftsmanship
Scores (between 1-5) on each Criteria
Creativity Interpretation of theme Formal qualities
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESSAY EVALUATION
Essays
Essay01
Essay02
Essay03
Essay04
Essay05
Essay06
Essay07
Focus
Scores (between 1-4) on each Criteria
Language use, style &
Support Organization
conventions
Originality
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Art and Essay Contest
“Who is My Neighbour?””
ART RUBRIC
Criteria
Craftsmanship
Creativity
Poor Quality
(1 point)
There is no evidence of skill
development in the media;
little technical competency
Does not exhibit innovative
thinking – very little
experimentation to enhance
concepts
Does not exhibit creative
thinking skills – uses trite or
over-used images and/or
approach
Interpretation
of theme
Formal
qualities
Good Quality
(3 points)
Demonstrates some skill
with the media;
technically proficient
Exhibits innovative
thinking – sufficient
experimentation to
enhance concepts
Unusual approach, play
on image and
Excellent Quality
(5 points)
Demonstrates strong skill with
the media; technically
accomplished
Exhibits distinct
experimentation and innovation
to enhance creative concepts
Use of strong metaphor,
personal meaning and/or
elaborate or complex visual
responses
Poor interpretation and
communication of thematic
concepts due to inappropriate
or inadequate images and
thoughts
Composition lacking a cohesive
appearance
Adequate Interpretation
and communication of
thematic concepts
Strong and apparent connection
to the theme
Excellent interpretation and
communication of thematic
concepts
Composition lacking a
cohesive appearance
Composition is cohesively
unified
Weak integration of elements
and principles of design
Some integration of
elements and principles
of design
Strong integration of elements
and principles of design
Art and Essay Contest
“Who is My Neighbour?”
ESSAY RUBRIC
Criteria
Focus
1
The essay poorly
deals with the topic
and includes
irrelevant ideas
Provides little or no
support for the main
point
2
The essay is focused
on the topic and
includes few loosely
related ideas
Main point is
supported with some
underdeveloped
reasons, evidence or
examples
3
The essay is focused
on the topic and
includes relevant
ideas
Main point is
strengthened with
developed reasons,
evidence or examples
Organization
Little or no
organization of ideas
to build an argument
Some organization of
ideas to build an
argument
Organizes ideas to
build an argument
Language use,
style and
conventions
Little or no use of
elements of style
Some use of elements
of style
Appropriate use of
elements of style
Many errors in
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation,
makes reader’s
comprehension
difficult
No experimentation
with language to
enhance concepts
Contains frequent
errors in grammar,
spelling and
punctuation
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with
very few errors
Very little
experimentation to
enhance concepts
Sufficient
experimentation with
language to enhance
concepts
No adherence to
theme
Does not address the
theme in a creative
way
Support
Originality
Applies creative
thinking to express
the theme
4
The essay is focused,
purposeful, and
reflects clear
insights and ideas
Main point is
convincingly
supported with welldeveloped reasons,
evidence and/or
examples
Effectively organizes
ideas to build a
logical, coherent
argument
Effective use of
elements of style to
strengthen meaning
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
with very few errors
Distinctive
experimentation
with language and
usage to enhance
concepts
Applies higher order
thinking and creative
skills to express the
theme