Health Policy Critique Urine Drug Screen Collection Policy D’Ann Somerall University of Alabama School of Nursing Doctorate of Nursing Practice Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for NUR 790, Health Policy and Politics. September 14, 2009 Introduction The policy to be critiqued is the urine drug screen (UDS) collection policy used at the Pain Clinic at Cooper Green Mercy Hospital (CGMH) in Birmingham, AL. The clinic has a census of approximately 900 patients with an average of fifteen new referrals each month. The primary chief complaint for referral is low back pain. Secondary referrals include chronic neck pain, fibromyalgia, complex pain syndrome and cancer related pain. The most widely used method of monitoring illicit drug use and/or drug adherence in a pain clinic setting, such as in the CGMH Pain Clinic setting, is the UDS. Patients, at initial appointment to the Pain Clinic, sign an Opiate Agreement which outlines the plan for receiving opiates as a part of the treatment plan. The Opiate Agreement explains that the patient will submit a urine sample for a drug screen evaluation at each medication pick-up and/or appointment. The author of this paper became aware of the poor procedure for urine drug screen collection from the following actual interaction with a patient (Personal experience, July, 2009). Ms. A was found to be positive by UDS for methamphetamines (only prescribed Methadone). The patient was called to the Pain Clinic for counseling and was given a warning for illicit drug use. This was all explained to the patient who very calmly stated that she had been buying urine from a “kid who goes to a Methadone Clinic” because he had promised her he would stay clean. This patient paid the “kid” twenty-five dollars per sample. The patient stated that since “you” didn’t monitor what she took into the bathroom, she just put the sample from her source in her purse and poured it into the container once she arrived at the clinic. Description of Policy The above facts being known the author sought to examine the official policy established by the clinic. The author found that there is no official policy for the collection of urine samples for the Pain Clinic. A review of the eight year history of the clinic found a set of Policies and Procedures which were initially formulated but were never submitted for formal review for adoption. The “unofficial” policy states, “A patient will submit a urine sample as deemed appropriate by the health care provider.” (Policy and Procedures, 2001) The patient is verbally instructed that the UDS provides not only monitoring for drug adherence and for illicit drug use, but can also provide grounds for termination from the clinic. With such dire consequences contingent on the results of the UDS, the author believes there should be an established policy in place. Discussions with the Clinic Director regarding establishing a policy spearheaded the decision to use the Urine Specimen Collection Guidelines set forth by the Department of Transportation (DOT). These guidelines are detailed and specific and are updated on a consistent basis by the DOT. The following are guidelines outline the process for urine collection for prescription pick-up from the Pain Clinic at CGMH: o o o o o o The patient signs a registration log at clerk’s window The unit clerk informs, via phone, the LPN/MA that the patient has registered for prescription pick-up The LPN/MA calls the patient to a triage room where the patient presents a “blue card” which states the co-pay information; staff collects co-pay if applicable (the blue card is NOT a photo ID) The staff retrieves urine cup and label, writes name of patient and patient’s medical record number on label which is affixed to cup; zip lock bag and cup are given to patient The patient is directed to the hallway public bathroom where the toilet has no blue dye, water and hand soap are available for hand washing The patient exits bathroom after voiding and is directed to place cup with sample in plastic bag and to deposit it in tub; the tub with all samples from morning are taken to the lab prior to lunch break and the samples from the afternoon are taken to the lab after the conclusion of patient appointments o The UDS analyzes for benzodiazepines, amphetamines, methamphetamines, opiates, cocaine, THC and Methadone Effects of Policy The health care providers in the Pain Clinic use the results of the UDS to monitor adherence to the medication treatment regimen and to determine if the patient is avoiding illicit drugs which, in combination with the drugs prescribed by the providers in the Pain Clinic, could be harmful to the patient. A small number of patients have had positive UDS’s that have caused these patients to be discharged from the clinic. The most valuable benefit thus far has been to monitor adherence to the treatment regimen as outlined. Identification and Application of Model The following are guidelines established by the Department of Transportation for quality UDS collection (only the guidelines that can be used by the Pain Clinic are listed): o o o o o A single toilet restroom with full length privacy door or a multi-stall restroom with partial length doors are to be utilized (DOT, pg 4) A source of water for washing hands is external to the restroom; if only source of water is available in the restroom the patient may wash his or her hands and then the water source is cut off A bluing agent is instilled in the toilet, plus soap dispensers are secured to alleviate adulteration of the sample Patient presents an acceptable photo ID (driver’s license, military ID) Actual Collection process: Before each collection to deter potential tampering, adulteration, alteration or substitution of the specimen Secure all water sources Water in tank and toilet has bluing agent instilled Secure areas and items (trash can, paper towel holder, under sink area) Only one collection at a time Presentation of photo identification Patient is asked to remove all unnecessary outer clothing and to leave purse and other belongings with outer clothing (may safeguard items by locking in a secured area) Patient is to empty pockets and display items to ensure no items are present that could be used to adulterate the specimen Patient is directed to wash hands and dry – no further access to water may be allowed Specimen collection device is given to patient who un-breaks the seal at that time Patient is directed to restroom for urination of at least 45 mls, told not to flush toilet and to return specimen to staff After staff have acquired specimen temperature (90 degrees to 100 degrees) and volume are measured and specimen is observed for adulteration or substitution Conclusions/Suggestions The following are ideas for modifications to the guidelines provided by the DOT and the present “unofficial guidelines” for the Pain Clinic Urine Collection. The DOT, even modified, would ensure optimal accountability on the patient’s part for providing a true urine sample. The restroom used by the Pain Clinic is also used by the patients attending Physical Therapy sessions and Psychiatry appointments. Thus, turning off the water supply would inconvenience many patients not in the Pain Clinic, but using a bluing agent would be an easy line of defense from using water from the toilet and tank and would be a very cheap intervention. Assessing the temperature of the urine sample immediately upon receipt of the sample would provide an instant accountability measure. Patient will be required to leave outer clothing and purses, satchels in triage room in a locked cabinet. This simple step will alleviate samples being hidden in purses, etc. Patient will present photo ID as well as blue card for identification. The primary benefit of developing a written policy is to ensure consistency and quality of care. By utilizing certain aspects of the DOT Guidelines in formulating collection guidelines fo r the Pain Clinic the consistency and quality of care for the patients will be improved – and improved care is what we, as health care providers, should all strive to obtain. References Urine Specimen Collection Guidelines. Department of Transportation, August 25, 2008, http://transportation.ky.gov/transportationdelivery/Urine%20Collection%20Guidelines%20(Effecti ve%20August%2025,%202008).pdf Policies and Procedures for the Cooper Green Mercy Hospital Pain Clinic. (unofficial copy) August, 2001.