Our upcoming Bibliography Database is still being up-dated with information from our old static
list. This old list is below; it is no longer being up-dated. Once the Bibliography Database is
activated this Word document will no longer be available. Thank you for your patience during
this transition.
A













♦Acredolo, L. P., Adams, A., & Goodwyn, S. W. (1984). The role of self-produced
movement and visual tracking in infant spatial orientation. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 38, 312-327.
♦Adams, R., White, J., Flannery, K., & Finn, P. (April, 2004). A virtual reality maze pilot
study: Cross-sectional investigation of age by task complexity. Poster presented at the
Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
♦Adams, R., Flannery, K, Finn, P., & Hamilton, D. (March, 2003). A virtual reality pilot
study: Assessment of memory and vigilance with a virtual radial arm maze. Poster
presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, MD.
♦Agogino, A. M. & Linn, M. C. (1992). Retaining female engineering students: Will
early design experiences help? [Viewpoint Editorial]. M. Wilson (Ed.), National Science
Foundation Directions, 5 (2), 8-9.
♦Ainsworth, S.E. (2006). DEFT: A conceptual framework for learning with multiple
representations. Learning and Instruction. 16(3), 183-198.
♦Ainsworth, S.E. & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation.
Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-255.
♦Ainsworth, S.E & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with
text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
♦Ainsworth, S.E., Bibby, P.A & Wood, D.J. (2002). Examining the effects of different
multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the
Learning Sciences, 11(1), 25-62. ISSN 1050-8406.
♦Ainsworth, S.E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers
and Education, 33(2/3), 131-152.
♦Allen, S., Ozyurek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M.
(2007). How language specific is early syntactic packaging of Manner and Path? A
comparison of English, Turkish, and Japanese. Cognition, 102, 16-48.
♦Alvarado, C., & Davis, R. (2001). Resolving ambiguities to create a natural sketch
based interface. Proceedings of IJCAI-2001, August 2001.
♦Ashley, A. & Carlson, L. (in press). Encoding direction when interpreting proximal
terms. Language and Cognitive Processes.
♦Avraamides, M., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Use of
cognitive vs. perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on response mode.
Psychological Science, 15, 403-408.
B
















♦Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience on spatial test
performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327-344.
♦Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of
sex related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual
Differences, 7, 363-379.
♦Bai, X. and Latecki, L. J. (2008). Path Similarity Skeleton Graph Matching. IEEE
Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 30(7).
♦Bai, X., Yang, X. and Latecki, L. J. (2008). Detection and Recognition of Contour Parts
Based on Shape Similarity. Pattern Recognition (PR), 41(7), 2189-2199.
♦Baillargeon, R. (1991). Reasoning about the height and location of a hidden object in
4.5- and 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 38, 13-42.
♦Bamps, D. (2009). Jeremy Bentham: A critical approach. In J. Peeters (Ed), Ethics and
Society (pp. 23-25). Leuven: Leuven University College, Dep. Social School.
♦Bamps, D. & Claeys, A. (2009). Are we always in control of the passion? Aha
wetenstappen Leuven, Tourism Leuven – Association Catholic University of Leuven.
♦Bamps, D. & Roels, R. (2009). Visualization of a beautiful mind, mathematical eyeopeners of moral behaviour and related (hidden) consequences. In the Proceedings of the
Gordon Research Conferences: Visualization in science & education, Magdalen College
Oxford, United Kingdom.
♦Barkowsky, T., Mental representation and processing of geographic knowledge: A
computational approach, LNAI 2541, Springer, Berlin 2002.
♦Barkowsky T, Freksa C, Cognitive requirements on making and interpreting maps, in
Hirtle S, Frank A, eds, Spatial information theory, 347-361, Springer, Berlin 1997.
♦Barkowsky T, Freksa C, Knauff M, eds, Special Issue Spatial and visual components in
mental reasoning about space, Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 2 & 3, 115-269,
2005.
♦Barkowsky T, Knauff M, Ligozat G, Montello D, eds, Spatial cognition V: Reasoning,
Action, Interaction, LNAI, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (to appear).
♦Barshi, I. & Healy, A. F. (2002). The effects of mental representation on performance in
a navigation task. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1189-1203.
♦Bateman, J., Tenbrink, T. and Farrar, S. (2007). The Role of Conceptual and Linguistic
Ontologies in Interpreting Spatial Discourse. Discourse Processes, 44(3), 175–212.
♦Beckmann, S. (2004). Solving Algebra and Other Story Problems with Simple
Diagrams: A Method Demonstrated in Grade 4–6 Texts Used in Singapore. The
Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 42-46.
♦Belingard, L., & Péruch, P. (2000). Mental representation and the spatial structure of
virtual environments. Environment & Behavior, 32, 427-442.

















♦Bertel, S., Vrachliotis, G., & Freksa, C, Aspect-oriented building design: Towards
computer-aided approaches to solving spatial constraints in architecture. In: G. Allen,
(Ed.), Applied Spatial Cognition: From Research to Cognitive Technology, pp. 75-102.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2007.
♦Berzhanskaya, J., Grossberg, S. and Mingolla, E. (2007). Laminar cortical dynamics of
visual form and motion interactions during coherent object motion perception. Spatial
Vision, 20(4), 337-395.
♦Bingman, V.P. and Cheng, K. (2005). Mechanisms of animal global navigation:
Comparative perspectives and enduring challenges. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution, 17:
295-318.
♦Bingman, V.P., Gagliardo, A., Hough II, G.E., Ioalè, P., Kahn, M.C. and Siegel, J.J.
(2005). The avian hippocampus, homing in pigeons and the memory representation of
large-scale space. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45: 555-564.
♦Bingman, V.P., Hough II, G.E., Kahn, M.C. and Siegel, J.J. (2003). The homing pigeon
hippocampus and space: In search of adaptive specialization. Brain, Behavior and
Evolution, 62: 117-127.
♦Bingman, V.P. and Sharp, P.E. (2006). Neuronal implementation of hippocampalmediated spatial behavior: A comparative-evolutionary perspective. Behavioral and
Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 5: 80-91.
♦Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M. & Motes, M. (2006). Object-Spatial Imagery: A New
Self-Report Imagery Questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 239-263.
♦Blajenkova, O., Motes, M. & Kozhevnikov, M. (2005). Individual differences in the
representations of novel environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 97109.
♦Blasko, D., Holliday-Darr, K., Mace, D., & Blasko-Drabik, H. (2004). VIZ: The
visualization assessment and training website. Behavior Research Methods Instruments &
Computers, 36(2), 256-260.
♦Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers'
conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1-22.
♦Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding time through spatial
metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28.
♦Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2002). The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract
Thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185-188.
♦Borst, G., Kosslyn, S. M., & Denis, M. (2006). Different cognitive processes in two
image scanning paradigms. Memory and Cognition, 34, 475-490.
♦Bourgeois, K.S., Khawar, A.W., Neal, S.A., & Lockman, J.J. (2005). Infant manual
exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interrelations. Infancy, 8(3), 233–252.
♦Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic
perspective. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, M. Garrett, and L. Nadel (Eds.), Language and
space (pp. 385-436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
♦Bremner, A. J., Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (in press). Infants (lost) in peripersonal
space? Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
♦Bremner, A. J., Mareschal, D., Lloyd-Fox, S., & Spence, C. (2008). Spatial localization
of touch in the first year of life: Early influence of a visual code and the development of
remapping across changes in limb position. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 137, 149-162.
















♦Bremner, J.G. & Andreasen, G. (1997). A change in viewpoint promotes use of heightin-picture as a depth cue in 5- to 7-year-olds' drawings of a simple depth relationship.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 180–192.
♦Bremner, J.G. & Andreasen, G. (1998). Young children's ability to use maps and models
to find ways in novel spaces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 197-218.
♦Bremner, J.G., Andreasen, G., Kendall, G. & Adams, L. (1993). Conditions for success
in coordination of spatial dimensions by four – year – old children. Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 149–172.
♦Bremner, J.G. & Batten, A. (1991). Sensitivity to viewpoint in children's drawings of
objects and relations between objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 52,
375–394.
♦Bremner, J.G., Johnson, S.P., Slater, A.M., Mason, U., Foster, K., Cheshire, A., &
Spring, J. (2005). Conditions for Young Infants' Perception of Object Trajectories. Child
Development, 74, 1029-1043.
♦Bremner, J.G., Knowles, L.S. & Andreasen, G. (1994). Young children's spatial
orientation during movement: Evidence for a form of mental rotation. Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology. 57, 355–376.
♦Bridgeman, B. and Hoover, M. (2008). Processing spatial layout by perception and
sensorimotor interaction. Experimental Psychology, iFirst, 1-9.
♦Broaders, S., Cook, S.W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (in press). Making
Children Gesture Reveals Implicit Knowledge and Leads to Learning. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General.
♦Brockmole, J., Castelhano, M.S. & Henderson, J.M. (2006). Contextual Cueing in
Naturalistic Scenes: Global and Local Contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32(4), 699-706.
♦Brown, A.A., Spetch, M.L., & Hurd, P.L. (2007). Growing in circles: Rearing
environment alters spatial navigation in fish. Psychological Science, 18, 569-573.
♦Brown, J., Bullock, D., and Grossberg, S. (1999). How the basal ganglia use parallel
excitatory and inhibitory learning pathways to selectively respond to unexpected
rewarding cues. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 10502-10511.
♦Brown, J.W., Bullock, D., and Grossberg, S. (2004). How laminar frontal cortex and
basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades. Neural Networks,
17, 471-510.
♦Brown, J., Johnson, M.H., Paterson, S., Gilmore, R.O., Gsödl, M., Longhi, E., &
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with
Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1037-1046.
♦Bruggeman, H. , Pick, H. L. Jr. & Rieser J. J. (2005). Learning to throw on a rotating
carousel: Recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics. Experimental
Brain Research, 163, 188-197.
♦Brunye, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S. & Taylor, H. A. (in press).
When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns and perspective-taking during narrative
comprehension. Psychological Science.
♦Brunye, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S. & Taylor, H. A. (in press). Emotional
state and local versus global spatial memory. Acta Psychologica.














♦Brunye, T. T., Rapp, D. N. & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Representational flexibility and
specificity following spatial descriptions of real-world environments. Cognition, 108,
418-443.
♦Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Extended experience benefits spatial mental
model development with route but not survey descriptions. Acta Psychologica, 127, 340354.
♦Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, H.A. (in press). When goals constrain: Eye movements and
memory for goal-oriented map study. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
♦Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Working memory in developing and applying
mental models from spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 701-729.
♦Brunyé, T. T., Taylor, H. A., Rapp, D. N., & Spiro, A. B. (2006). Learning procedures:
The role of working memory in multimedia learning experiences. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 20, 917-940.
♦Brunye, T. T., Taylor, H. A. & Worboys, M. (2007). Levels of detail in descriptions and
depictions of geographic space. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 7, 227-266.
♦Bullock, D., Cisek, P. and Grossberg, S. (1998). Cortical networks for control of
voluntary arm movements under variable force conditions (Tech. Rep. No. CAS/CNS
TR-95-019, Boston University). Cerebral Cortex, 8, 48-62.
♦Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in
Cognitive Neuroscience 10 551-7.
♦Burgess N., Maguire E.A., O'Keefe J. (2002) The human hippocampus and spatial and
episodic memory. Neuron 35, 625-641.
♦Burgess N., Spiers H.J., Paleologou E. (2004) Orientational manoeuvres in the dark:
dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences in spatial memory. Cognition 94 149166.
♦Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning From Text With Diagrams: Promoting Mental Model
Development and Inference Generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182197.
♦Butcher, K. R. & Aleven, V. (2007). Integrating visual and verbal knowledge during
classroom learning with computer tutors. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 137-142). Austin, TX:
Cognitive Science Society.
♦Butcher, K. R., Bhushan, S. & Sumner, T. (2006). Multimedia displays for conceptual
search processes: Information seeking with strand maps. ACM Multimedia Systems
Journal, 11(3), 236-248.
♦Butcher, K. R., de la Chica, S., Ahmad, F., Gu, Q., Sumner, T. & Martin, J. H. (2008).
Conceptual Customization for Learning with Multimedia: Developing Individual
Instructional Experiences to Support Science Understanding. In R. Zheng (Ed.),
Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Hersehy, PA: IGI Global.
C
















♦Cameron, S., Grossberg, S., and Guenther, F.H. (1998). A self-organizing neural
network architecture for navigation using optic flow. Neural Computation, 10, 313-352.
♦Campos, J.L. & Bülthoff, H.H. (in press). Multisensory Integration during Self-Motion
in Virtual Reality. In Wallace, M., and Murray, M. (Eds.), Frontiers in the Neural Bases
of Multisensory Processes (projected publication date Fall 2009).
♦Carlson, L. A. (2003). Using spatial language. Psychology of Learning and Motivation,
43, 127-161.
♦Carlson, L. A. & Kenny, R. (2006). Interpreting spatial terms involves simulating
interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 682-688.
♦Carlson, L. A, Regier, T., Lopez, B. & Corrigan, B. (In press). Attention unites form
and function in spatial language. Spatial Cognition and Computation.
♦Carlson, L. A. & Van Deman, S. (in press). Inhibition within a reference frame during
the interpretation of spatial language. Cognition.
♦Carlson, L. A. & Van Deman, S. (2004). The space in spatial language. Journal of
Memory and Language, 51(3), 418-436.
♦Carpenter, G.A. (2001). Neural network models of learning and memory: Leading
questions and an emerging framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(3), 114-118.
♦Carpenter, G.A., Gaddam, C.S., & Mingolla, E. (2007). CONFIGR: A vision-based
model for long-range figure completion. Neural Networks, 20(10), 1109-1131.
♦Carpenter, G.A., Martens, S., & Ogas, O.J. (2005). Self-organizing information fusion
and hierarchical knowledge discovery: A new framework using ARTMAP neural
networks. Neural Networks, 18(3), 287-295.
♦Carr, M. and Janes, P. (2007, May). Spatial ability, gender and cognitive strategy use as
predictors of mathematics subtest performance. Presented at the NSF sponsored
workshop on spatial processing, Hancock, MI.
♦Carr, M., Shing, Y. L., Janes, P. & Steiner, H. H. (2007, March). Early gender
differences in strategy use and fluency: Implications for the emergence of gender
differences in mathematics. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for
Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.
♦Carr, M., Shing, Yee Lee, Steiner, H. H. & Kyser, B. (2005, April). A Comparison of
predictors of gender differences in calculation, geometry and word problem solving.
Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
♦Carr, M., Steiner, H. H., Kyser, B. & Biddlecomb, B. (in press). A Comparison of
Predictors of Early Emerging Gender Differences in Mathematics Competency. Learning
and Individual Differences.
♦Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L., Time in the mind: Using space to think about time,
Cognition (2007), doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
♦Casasola, M. (2005). Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on
infants' categorization of support spatial relations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 183192.


















♦Casasola, M. (in preparation). Comparison and language in infants' categorization of
spatial relations.
♦Casasola, M. (2005). When less is more: How infants learn to form an abstract
categorical representation of support. Child Development, 76, 279-290.
♦Casasola, M., Wilbourn, M. P., & Yang, S. (2006). Can English-learning toddlers
acquire and generalize a novel spatial word? First Language, 26, 187-205.
♦Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2008). The Influence of Color and Structure on
Perception of Scene Gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 34(3), 660-675.
♦Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2007). Initial Scene Representations Facilitate
Eye Movement Guidance in Visual Search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 33(4), 753-763.
♦Castelhano, M.S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (in press). Integration of multiple views
of scenes. Perception & Psychophysics.
♦Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on
problem solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition,15, 1147-1156.
♦Chabanne, V., Péruch, P., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2003). Virtual to real transfer of spatial
learning in a complex environment: The role of path network and additionnal features.
Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 43-59.
♦Chabanne, V., Péruch, P., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2004). Sex differences and women's
hormonal cycle effects on spatial performance in a virtual environment navigation task.
Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 351-375.
♦Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2004). Modern Mechanics. American Journal of Physics,
72, 439-445.
♦Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2006). Restructuring the introductory electricity and
magnetism course. American Journal of Physics, 74(4), 329-336.
♦Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of
the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098-1120.
♦Cheng, K. & Newcombe, N.S. (2006). Geometry, features, and orientation in vertebrate
animals: A pictorial review. In M.F. Brown & R.G. Cook (Eds.), Animal Spatial
Cognition: Comparative, Neural & Computational Approaches. In cooperation with
Comparative Cognition Press.
♦Childers, J. (2005) Is comparison useful for verb learning? Paper presented at the
biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
♦Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech
as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43-71.
♦Cienki, A. (2005). Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to
Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 421–441). Berlin/New York:
Mouton de Gruyter.
♦Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric
expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (189–
204). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
♦Cienki, A. (2002). Questions about mental imagery, gesture, and image schemas.
Journal of Mental Imagery, 26, 43–46.
















♦Cienki, A. (1995). The semantics of possessive and spatial constructions in Russian and
Bulgarian: A comparative analysis in cognitive grammar. Slavic and East European
Journal, 39, 73–114.
♦Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor,
K. D. Lee, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the
Construction of Meaning (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
♦Cienki, A. (1989). Spatial Cognition and the Semantics of Prepositions in English,
Polish, and Russian. In the series Slavistische Beiträge Vol. 237. Munich: Sagner Verlag.
♦Cienki, A. (1998). Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions.
Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 107–149.
♦Cienki, A. (1999). The strengths and weaknesses of the left/right polarity in Russian:
Diachronic and synchronic semantic analyses. In L. de Stadler & C. Eyrich (Eds.), Issues
in Cognitive Linguistics: 1993 Proceedings of the International Cognitive Linguistics
Conference (pp. 299–329). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
♦Cisek, P., Grossberg, S., and Bullock, D. (1998). A cortico-spinal model of reaching and
proprioception under multiple task constraints. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10,
425-444.
♦Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., et al. (1997).
QuickSet: Multimodal interaction for distributed applications. Proceedings of the Fifth
Annual International Multimodal Conference (Multimedia '97), (pp. 31-40), Seattle, WA.
ACM Press.
♦Contreras-Vidal, J.L., Grossberg, S., and Bullock, D. (1997). A neural model of
cerebellar learning for arm movement control: Cortico-spino-cerebellar dynamics.
Learning and Memory, 3, 475-502.
♦Coolican, J., and Peters, M. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in the 2D:4D ratio and its
relation to mental rotation performance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 179-183.
♦Collaer, M. L. & Hill, E. M. (2006). Large sex difference in adolescents on a timed line
judgment task: Attentional contributors and task relationship to mathematics. Perception,
35, 561-572.
♦Collaer, M. L., & Nelson, J. D. (2002). Large visuospatial sex difference in line
judgment: Possible role of attentional factors. Brain and Cognition, 49, 1-12.
♦Collaer, M. L., Reimers, S., & Manning, J. T. (2007). Visuospatial performance on an
Internet line judgment task and potential hormonal markers: Sex, sexual orientation and
2D:4D. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 177-192.
♦Cook, S. W. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: Do children
use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 211232.
♦Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (in press). Gesturing makes learning
last. Cognition.
♦Coulter, B. and Kerski, J. (2005). Using GIS to transform the mathematical landscape.
Chapter 22 in Technology-Supported Mathematical Learning Environments: 67th
Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: National
Council of the Teachers of Mathematics.
♦Crowther, H. L., Lew, A. R. & Whitaker, C. J. (2000). The development of beacon use
for spatial orientation in 6-8.5-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 23,
41-59.
D















♦Daniel, M.-P., & Denis, M. (2004). The production of route directions: Investigating
conditions that favour conciseness in spatial discourse. Applied Cognitive Psychology,
18, 57-75.
♦Daniel, M.-P., Mores Dibo-Cohen, C., Carité, L., Boyer, P., & Denis, M. (2007).
Dysfunctions of spatial cognition in schizophrenic patients. Spatial Cognition and
Computation, 7, 287-309.
♦Daniel, M.-P., Tom, A., Manghi, E., & Denis, M. (2003). Testing the value of route
directions through navigational performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 269289.
♦Davies, J., Glasgow, J. & Kuo, T. (2006). Visio-spatial case-based reasoning: A case
study in prediction of protein structure. Computational Intelligence, 22(3/4), 194-207.
♦Davies, J. & Goel, A. K. (2008). Visual re-representation in analogical reasoning. The
Open Artificial Intelligence Journal, 2, 11-20.
♦Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H., Beschin, N., & Denis, M. (2004). Preserved visuo-spatial
transformations in representational neglect. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1358-1364.
♦Denis, M. (in press). Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images
constructed from verbal descriptions: A study of individual differences in the mental
comparison of distances. Acta Psychologica.
♦Denis, M. (2002). Can human brain construct visual mental images from linguistic
inputs? In A. M. Galaburda, S. M. Kosslyn, & Y. Christen (Eds.), The languages of the
brain (pp. 215-225). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
♦Denis, M. (1989). Image et cognition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Revised
English version: Image and cognition. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
♦Denis, M. (Ed.) (1997). Langage et cognition spatiale. Paris: Masson.
♦Denis, M. (1979). Les images mentales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Spanish
translation: Las imagenes mentales. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno de Espana, 1984. Japanese
translation: Imeji no shinrigaku. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo, 1989.
♦Denis, M. (2000). Psychological science in cross-disciplinary contexts. In K. Pawlik &
M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), The international handbook of psychology (pp. 585-597).
London: Sage.
♦Denis, M. (2006). Psychological science in its multidisciplinary environment. In Q.
Jing, M. R. Rosenzweig, G. d'Ydewalle, H. Zhang, H.-C. Chen, & K. Zhang (Eds.),
Progress in psychological science around the world. Vol. 1: Neural, cognitive and
developmental issues (pp. 49-60). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
♦Denis, M., Beschin, N., Logie, R. H., & Della Sala, S. (2002). Visual perception and
verbal descriptions as sources for generating mental representations: Evidence from
representational neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 97-112.
♦Denis, M., & Borst, G. (2006). Variations on the image scanning paradigm: What do
they contribute to our knowledge of mental imagery? In T. Vecchi & G. Bottini (Eds.),
Imagery and spatial cognition: Methods, models and cognitive assessment (pp. 49-68).
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.














♦Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Richardson, J. T. E. (Eds.) (1988). Cognitive and
neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Martinus Nijhoff.
♦Denis, M., & Loomis, J. M. (Eds.) (2007). Human spatial cognition: Memory,
navigation, and environmental learning. Special Issue of Psychological Research.
♦Denis, M., Mellet, E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (Eds.) (2004). Neuroimaging of mental
imagery. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
♦Denis, M., Michon, P.-E., & Tom, A. (2006). Assisting pedestrian wayfinding in urban
settings: Why references to landmarks are crucial in direction-giving. In G. L. Allen
(Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 25-51).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
♦Denis, M., Ricalens, K., Baudouin, V., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2006). Deficits in the
spatial discourse of Alzheimer patients. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in
languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 335-349). Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
♦Denis, M., & Sabah, G. (Eds.) (1993). Modèles et concepts pour la science cognitive:
Hommage à Jean-François Le Ny. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
♦Denis, M., et al. (Eds.) (2001). Imagery, language, and visuo-spatial thinking. Hove,
UK: Psychology Press.
♦Deubel, H., Schneider, W.X. and Bridgeman, B. (2002). Transsaccadic memory of
position and form. In J. Hyönä, D.P. Munoz, W. Heide and R. Radach (Eds.), Progress in
Brain Research, Vol. 140 (pp. 165-180). Elsevier.
♦Deyzac, E., Logie, R. H., & Denis, M. (2006). Visuospatial working memory and the
processing of spatial descriptions. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 217-243.
♦Diedrichsen, J., Grafton, S., Albert, N., Hazeltine, E., and Ivry, R.B. (2006). Goalselection and movement-related conflict during bimanual reaching movements. Cerebral
Cortex, 16, 1729-1738.
♦Dodick, J. T. and Orion, N (2003). Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of
geological time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 415-442.
♦Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J. & Levine, S. (2005). It's all relative: How young children
encode extent. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 51-63.
♦Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S. & Duffy, R. (2005). How infants encode spatial
extent. Infancy, 7, 81-90.
♦Duffy, S., Toriyama, R., Itakura, S. & Kitayama, S. (in press). The development of
culturally-contingent attention strategies in young children in the U.S. and Japan. Journal
of Experimental Child Psychology.
E


♦Egenhofer, M. J., Freksa, C., & Miller, H. J., eds., Geographic information science,
Third International Conference GIScience 2004, LNCS 3234, Springer, Berlin 2004.
♦Ehrlich, S. B., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. The importance of gesture in children's
spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, in press.






♦Emmorey, K. (2002). The effects of modality on spatial language: How signers and
speakers talk about space. In R. P. Meier, D. G. Quinto, & K. A. Cormier (Eds.),
Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 405-421), Cambridge
University Press.
♦Emmorey, K., Grabowski, TJ., McCullough, S., Ponto, L., Hichwa, R., & Damasio, H.
(2005). The neural correlates of spatial language in English and American Sign
Language: A PET study with hearing bilinguals. NeuroImage, 24, 832-840.
♦Emmorey, K., Klima, E., & Hickok, G. (1998). Mental rotation within linguistic and
nonlinguistic domains in users of American Sign Language. Cognition, 68, 221-246.
♦Emmorey, K., Kosslyn, S. M., & Bellugi, U. (1993). Visual imagery and visual-spatial
language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers. Cognition, 46,
139-181.
♦Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. (2000). Using space to describe space:
Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial cognition and computation, 2, 157-180.
♦Estes, Z., Verges, M. & Barsalou, L.W. (2008). Head Up, Foot Down: Object Words
Orient Attention to the Objects' Typical Location. Psychological Science, 19(2), 93-97.
F







♦Fabrikant, S.I. (2005). Towards an understanding of geovisualization with dynamic
displays: Issues and Prospects. Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial
Intelligence (AAAI) 2005 Spring Symposium Series: Reasoning with Mental and External
Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, Mar. 21-23, 2005, 6-11.
♦Fabrikant, S. I. and Montello, D. R. (2008). The effect of instructions on distance and
similarity judgments in information spatializations. International Journal of Geographic
Information Science, 22(4), 463-478.
♦Fabrikant, S. I., Montello, D. R. and Mark, D. M. (2006). The distance-similarity
metaphor in region-display spatializations. IEEE Computer Graphics & Application,
July/August, 34-44.
♦Fabrikant, S.I., Montello, D.R., Ruocco, M. and Middleton, R.S. (2004). The distancesimilarity metaphor in network-display spatializations. Cartography and Geographic
Information Science, 31(4), 237-252.
♦Fabrikant, S. I., Rebich-Hespanha, S., Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G. and Montello, D.
R. (2008). Novel Method to Measure Inference Affordance in Static Small Multiple
Displays Representing Dynamic Processes. The Cartographic Journal, 45(3), 201-215.
♦Fabrikant, S. I., Rebich-Hespanha, S. and Hegarty, M. (in press). Cognitively adequate
and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making. Annals of
the Association of American Geographers.
♦Fabrikant, S.I. and Skupin A. (2005). Cognitively plausible information visualization. In
J. Dykes, A.M. MacEachren & M.J. Kraak (Eds.), Exploring GeoVisualization, (pp. 667690). Elsevier: Amsterdam.



















♦Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine:
Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.
♦Feist, M. I. (in press). Inside/in/and/on/: Typological and psycholinguistic perspectives.
In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The state of the art
and new directions. London: Equinox.
♦Feist, M. I. (2004). Talking about space: A cross-linguistic perspective. In K. D. Forbus,
T. Regier, & D. Gentner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the
Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
♦Feist, M.I., & Genter, D. (2001). An influence of spatial language on recognition
memory for spatial scenes. In J.D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 279-284).
♦Feist, M. I., & Gentner, D. (2007). Spatial language influences memory for spatial
scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 283-296.
♦Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender
differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850-855.
♦Fennema, E. & Tartre, L.A. (1985). The use of spatial skills in mathematics by girls and
boys. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 184 -206.
♦Fiala, J.C., Grossberg, S. and Bullock, D. (1996). Metabotropic glutamate receptor
activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the classically
conditioned eye blink response. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 3760-3774.
♦Fias, W. & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D.
Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43-54). New York:
Psychology Press.
♦Finlay, C., Motes, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2006). Updating representations of learned
scenes. Psychological Researcher: Special Issue on Spatial Cognition.
♦Fischer, M. H. (2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers. Psychological
Science, 14(3), 278-282.
♦Fischer, M.H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations.
Cortex, 44, 386-392.
♦Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing - Evidence from a
pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10(4), 493-508.
♦Fischer, M. H., Castel. A. D., Dodd, M. D. & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers
causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555-556.
♦Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L. & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced by
number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 91-97.
♦Flanagan, R. (1996). Learning Through Direct vs. Indirect Experience: The role of
interactivity and physicality in media effects. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.
♦Flanagan, R. and Black, J.B. (2001). Effects of learning from interaction with physical
or mediated devices. In G. Burton and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Studies in Perception and
Action VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
♦Flanagan, R., Gurkewitz, R., Wilson, M., and Skrip, L. (in revision after feedback from
Perceptual and Motor Skills). Improving spatial reasoning through experience: Evidence
of priming and long-term effects.
♦Flannery, K.A., Krauchunas, S., & Finn, P. (2000). Virtual cognition laboratory: A
constructivist approach toward. In L.P. Nedel & R. S. Wazlawick (Eds.), Proceedings of

















the third workshop on virtual reality learning (pp. 89-95). Gramado, Brazil: Brazilian
Computer Society.
♦Foos, P. W. & Goolkasian, P. (2005). Presentation Format Effects in Working Memory:
The Role of Attention. Memory & Cognition, 33, 499-513.
♦Forbus, K. (1995). Qualitative spatial reasoning: Framework and frontiers. In J.
Glasgow, N. Narayanan, and B. Chandrasekaran, Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive
and computational perspectives, AAAI Press.
♦Forbus, K., Ferguson, R., & Usher, J. (2001). Towards a computational model of
sketching. IUI'01, January 14-17, 2001, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
♦Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1994). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based
retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205. (Abridged version to be reprinted in T. Polk &
C.M. Seifert (Eds.), Cognitive Modeling. Boston: MIT Press.)
♦Forbus, K., Nielsen, P. and Faltings, B. (1991). Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: The
CLOCK Project. Artificial Intelligence, 51 (1-3).
♦Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2002). Sketching for knowledge capture: A progress report.
Proceedings of IUI'02, San Francisco, California, January 13-16, 2002.
♦Fox-Gliessman, D. and Kerski, J. (2005). Technology and the study of wildfire: Middle
school students study the impacts of wildfire. Meridian: A Middle School Technology
Journal, 8(Winter).
♦Freksa C, Fuzzy logic: an interface between logic and human reasoning, IEEE Expert 9,
4, Aug. 1994, 20-21.
♦Freksa C, Spatial aspects of task-specific wayfinding maps: A representation-theoretic
perspective, in Gero JS, Tversky B, eds, Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design, 15-32,
Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, 1999.
♦Freksa C, Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals, Artificial Intelligence 54 (1992)
199-227.
♦Freksa, C, Qualitative spatial reasoning, in Mark DM, Frank AU, eds, Cognitive and
linguistic aspects of geographic space, 361-372, Kluwer, Dordrecht 1991.
♦Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., & Wender, K. F., eds., Spatial cognition II –
Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical
applications, LNAI 1849, Springer, Berlin, 2000.
♦Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., & Wender, K. F., eds., Spatial Cognition III – Routes
and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning,
LNAI 2685, Springer, Berlin, 2003.
♦Freksa, C., Habel, C., & Wender, K. F., eds., Spatial cognition, LNAI 1404, Springer,
Berlin, 1998.
♦Freksa C, Knauff M, Krieg-Brückner B, Nebel B, Barkowsky T, eds, Spatial cognition
IV – Reasoning, Action, Interaction, LNAI 3343, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
2005.
♦Freksa, C., & Mark, D. M., eds., Spatial information theory – Cognitive and
computational foundations of geographic information science, LNCS 1661, Springer,
Berlin, 1999.
♦Freksa C, Moratz R, Barkowsky T, Robot navigation with schematic maps, in Pagello E
et al, eds, Intelligent Autonomous Systems 6, 809-816, IOS Press, 2000.


♦Frost, B. J. & Sun, H.-J. (2003). The biological basis of time to collision computation.
In H. Hecht & G.J.P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact: Advances in Psychology
Series (pp. 13-37). Amsterdam (North Holland): Elsevier.
♦Furbach U, Dirlich G, Freksa C, Towards a theory of knowledge representation systems,
in Bibel W, Petkoff B, eds, Artificial Intelligence Methodology, Systems, Applications,
77-84, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1985.
G














♦Gancarz, G. and Grossberg, G. (1998). A neural model of the saccade generator in the
reticular formation. Neural Networks, 11, 1159-1174.
♦Gancarz, G. and Grossberg, G. (1999). A neural model of the saccadic eye movement
control explains task-specific adaptation. Vision Research, 39, 3123-3143.
♦Garrad-Cole, F., Lew, A.R., Bremner, J.G., & Whitaker, C.J. (2001). Use of
configurational geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo Sapiens).
Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 317-320.
♦Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive
Science, 7, 155-170.
♦Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two
systems in processing space-time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17,
537-565.
♦Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2002). Relational language and relational thought. In J.
Byrnes & E. Amsel (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development, (pp. 87-120).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
♦Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general
role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393-408.
♦Gentner, D., & Namy, L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories.
Cognitive Development, 14, 487-513.
♦Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A.
Gelman & J.P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in
development, (pp. 225-277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
♦Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.
Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
♦Gilbert, A. L., Regier,T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2005). Whorf hypothesis is supported
in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
103, 489-494.
♦Gilmore, R.O., Baker, T.J., & Grobman, K.H. (2004). Stability in infants' discrimination
of optic flow. Developmental Psychology, 40 (2), 259-270.
♦Gilmore, R.O. & Johnson, M.H. (1997). Body-centered representations for visuallyguided action emerge in early infancy. Cognition, 65, B1-B9.
♦Gilmore, R.O., & Johnson, M.H. (1997). Egocentric action in early infancy: Spatial
frames of reference for saccades. Psychological Science, 8(3), 224-230.





















♦Gilmore, R.O., & Rettke, H.R. (2003). Four-month-olds' discrimination of optic flow
patterns depicting different directions of observer motion. Infancy, 4(2), 177-200.
♦Giocomo, L.M., Zilli, E.A., Fransen, E., Hasselmo, M.E. (2007, March 23). Temporal
frequency of subthreshold oscillations scales with entorhinal grid cell field spacing.
Science, 315(5819), 1719-22. Abstract only.
♦Gnadt, W. and Grossberg, S. (in press). SOVEREIGN: An autonomous neural system
for incrementally learning planned action sequences to navigate towards a rewarded goal
(Tech. Rep. CAS/CNS-TR-07-015). Neural Networks.
♦Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (In press). Trading spaces: Carving up
events for learning language. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
♦Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
♦Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher's hands tell the
student's mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720-730.
♦Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math:
Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516-522.
♦Goldin-Meadow, S. & Singer, M. A. (2003). From children's hands to adults' ears:
Gesture's role in teaching and learning. Developmental Psychology, 39, 509-520.
♦Goldin-Meadow, S. & Wagner, S.M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in
Cognitive Science, 9, 234-241.
♦Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., and M. J. Spivey (Eds.) (2007).
Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
♦Goodsell, D. S. (2009). Fact and Fantasy in Nanotech Imagery. Leonardo, 42, 52-57.
♦Goodsell, D. S. (2009). Illustrating the Machinery of Life: Neuromuscular Synapse.
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Education (BAMBED), 37, 204-210.
♦Goodsell, D. S. (2003). Looking at Molecules: An Essay on Art and Science.
ChemBioChem, 4(1-5).
♦Goodsell, D.S. (2009). The Machinery of Life (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
♦Goodsell, D. S. (2007). Making the Step from Chemistry to Biology and Back. Nature
Chemical Biology, 3, 681-684.
♦Goodsell, D. S. (2005). Visual Methods from Atoms to Cells. Structure, 13, 347-354.
♦Goolkasian, P. & Foos, P.W. (2002) Presentation Format and Its Effect on Working
Memory. Memory & Cognition, 30,1096-1105.
♦Goolkasian, P. & Bojko, A. (2001). Location constancy and its effect on visual
selection. Spatial Vision 14, 175-201.
♦Gorchetchnikov, A. and Grossberg, S. (2007). Space, time, and learning in the
hippocampus: How fine spatial and temporal scales are expanded into population codes
for behavioral control. Neural Networks, 20(2), 182-93.
♦Grafton, S.T., Hazeltine, E., and Ivry, R.B. (2002). Motor sequence learning with the
non-dominant hand: A PET functional imaging study. Experimental Brain Research, 146,
369-378.
♦Gramann, K., Müller, H.J., Eick, E.-M. and Schönebeck, B. (2005). Evidence of
Separable Spatial Representations in a Virtual Navigation Task. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1199-1223.

















♦Gramann, K., Müller, H.J., Schönebeck, B. and Debus, G. (2006). The neural basis of
ego- and allocentric reference frames in spatial navigation: Evidence from spatiotemporal coupled current density reconstruction. Brain Research, 1118(1), 116-129.
♦Granger, E., Rubin, M., Grossberg, S., and Lavoie, P. (2001). A what-and-where fusion
neural network for recognition and tracking of multiple radar emitters. Neural Networks,
14, 325-344.
♦Gray, E.R., Bloomfield, L.L., Ferrey, A., Spetch, M.L. & Sturdy, C.B. (2005). Spatial
encoding in mountain chickadees: Features overshadow geometry. Biology Letters, 1,
314-317.
♦Gray, E. R. & Spetch, M.L. (2006). Pigeons encode absolute distance but relational
direction from landmarks and walls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal
Behavior Processes, 32, 474-480.
♦Griffin, A.L., Eichenbaum, H., Hasselmo, M.E. (2007). Spatial representations of
hippocampal CA1 neurons are modulated by behavioral context in a hippocampusdependent memory task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2416-23.
♦Grodner, D., Pietsch, C. & Durgin, F. (2009). The Use of Categorical Features in Adult
Spatial Reorientation. Proceedings of the 2009 Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Amsterdam: The Netherlands.
♦Grossberg, S. (2000). The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and
modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 233-246.
♦Grossberg, S. (2003). How does the cerebral cortex work? Development, learning,
attention, and 3D vision by laminar circuits of visual cortex. Behavioral and Cognitive
Neuroscience Reviews, 2, 47-76.
♦Grossberg, S. and Huang, T.R. (in press). ARTSCENE: A Neural System for Natural
Scene Classification. Journal of Vision.
♦Grossberg, S. and Merrill, J.W.L. (l996). The hippocampus and cerebellum in
adaptively timed learning, recognition, and movement. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 8, 257-277.
♦Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., and Pack, C. (1999). A neural model of motion processing
and visual navigation by cortical area MST. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 878-895.
♦Grossberg, S. and Paine, R.W.(2000). A neural model of corticocerebellar interactions
during attentive imitation and predictive learning of sequential handwriting movements.
Neural Networks, 13, 999-1046.
♦Grossberg, S. and Pearson, L. (in press). Laminar cortical dynamics of cognitive and
motor working memory, sequence learning and performance: Toward a unified theory of
how the cerebral cortex works (Tech. Rep. CAS/CNS-TR-08-002, Boston University).
Psychological Review.
♦Grossberg, S., Roberts, K., Aguilar, M., and Bullock, D. (1997). A neural model of
multimodal adaptive saccadic eye movement control by superior colliculus. Journal of
Neuroscience, 17, 9706-9725.
♦Grossberg, S. and Seidman, D. (2006). Neural dynamics of autistic behaviors:
Cognitive, emotional, and timing substrates. Psychological Review, 113, 483-525.
♦Gunzelmann, G. (2008). Strategy generalization across orientation tasks: Testing a
computational cognitive model. Cognitive Science, 32(5), 835-861.
♦Gunzelmann, G. & Anderson, J. R. (2006). Location matters: Why target location
impacts performance in orientation tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34(1), 41-59.





♦Gunzelmann, G., Anderson, J. R. & Douglass, S. (2004). Orientation tasks with multiple
views of space: Strategies and performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4(3),
207-253.
♦Gunzelmann, G. & Lyon, D. R. (2007). Mechanisms of human spatial competence. In T.
Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat and D. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V:
Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence #4387 (pp. 288307). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
♦Gureckis, T.M. and Love, B.C. (2009). Short Term Gains, Long Term Pains: How Cues
About State Aid Learning in Dynamic Environments. Cognition. DOI:
10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.013.
♦Gureckis, T.M. and Markant, D. (2009). Active Learning Strategies in a Spatial Concept
Learning Game. In Taatgen, N., van Rijn, H., Schomaker, L. and Nerbonne, J. (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 31453150). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
♦Gwizdka, J., & Spence, I. (2007). Implicit measures of lostness and success in web
navigation. Interacting with Computers, 19, 357-369.
H








♦Habel, C., & Werner, S., eds., Special issue on spatial reference systems, Spatial
Cognition and Computation, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1999.
♦Halpern, D. F., & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More
than meets the eye. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of
Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 170-212). Cambridge University Press.
♦Hartley T, Bird CM, Chan D, Cipolotti L, Husain M, Vargha-Khadem F, Burgess N
(2007) The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans.
Hippocampus 17 34-48.
♦Hartley T., Trinkler I., & Burgess N. (2004) Geometric determinants of human spatial
memory. Cognition 94 39-75.
♦Hasselmo, M.E. (2007). Arc length coding by interference of theta frequency
oscillations may underlie context-dependent hippocampal unit data and episodic memory
function. Learning and Memory, 14, 782-794.
♦Hasselmo, M.E. (2005). A model of prefrontal cortical mechanisms for goal directed
behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(7), 1115-29. MATLAB script
demonstrating models
♦Hasselmo, M.E. (2005). What is the function of hippocampal theta rhythm?--Linking
behavioral data to phasic properties of field potential and unit recording data.
Hippocampus, 15(7), 936-49.
♦Hasselmo, M.E. and Eichenbaum, H. (2005). Hippocampal mechanisms for the contextdependent retrieval of episodes. Neural Networks, 18(9), 1172-1190. MATLAB script
demonstrating models















♦Hasselmo, M.E., Giocomo, L.M., Zilli, E.A. (2007). Grid cell firing may arise from
interference of theta frequency membrane potential oscillations in single neurons.
Hippocampus, 17(12), 1252-1271.
♦Haun, D.B.M., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson S.C. (2006). Evolutionary psychology
of spatial representations in the Hominidae. Current Biology, 16, 1736-1740.
♦Haun, D.B.M., Rapold, C., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson, S.C. (2006). Cognitive
cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 17568-17573.
♦Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and
perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175 - 191.
♦Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah
& A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of Higher-level Visuospatial Thinking, (pp. 121 - 169).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
♦Herman, T., Morris, J., Colton, S., Batiza, A., Patrick, M., Franzen, M. & Goodsell, D.
S. (2006). Tactile Teaching: Exploring Protein Structure/Function Using Physical
Models. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Education (BAMBED), 34, 247-254.
♦Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. (Eds.) (2006) Action meets word: How children learn
verbs. New York: Oxford University Press.
♦Hochmair, H.H., Büchner, S., Hölscher, C. (in press). Impact of Regionalization and
Relative Detour on ad-hoc Path Choice. Spatial Cognition and Computation.
♦Holliday-Darr, K., Blasko, D., & Dwyer, C. (1999) Improving Cognitive Visualization
with a Web-Based Interactive Assessment and Training program. American Society for
Engineering Educators, Engineering Design Graphics Division 54th Annual Mid Year
Meeting Proceedings, 147-151.
♦Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Brösamle, M., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2007). Signs and
Maps – Cognitive Economy in the Use of External Aids for Indoor Navigation. In D. S.
McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science
Society (pp. 377-382). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
♦Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2007). Map Use and Wayfinding
Strategies in a Multi-Building Ensemble. In T. Barkowsky, et al. (Eds.), Spatial
Cognition V - Reasoning, Action, Interaction. International Conference Spatial Cognition
2006, Bremen, Germany, September 2006, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol.
4387, pp. 365–380.
♦C. Hölscher, R. Conroy Dalton & A. Turner (Eds.). (2007). Space Syntax and Spatial
Cognition: Proceedings of the Workshop held in Bremen, 24th September 2006. Bremen:
University of Bremen Press.
♦Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M., & Knauff, M. (2006). Up the
Down Staircase: Wayfinding Strategies and Multi-Level Buildings. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 284-299.
♦Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, W. M., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hand's eye:
Representational gestures are sensitive to conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 22(3), 313-336.
♦Hsi, S., Linn, M.C., & Bell, J.E. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and
the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (2), 151-158.















♦Hubbard, T. L. (2006). Computational theory and cognition in representational
momentum and related types of displacement: A reply to Kerzel. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 13, 174-177.
♦Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2005). An effect of context on whether memory for
initial position exhibits a Fröhlich Effect or an Onset Repulsion Effect. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 961-979.
♦Hubbard, T. L. (2004). The perception of causality: Insights from Michotte's launching
effect, naive impetus theory, and representational momentum. In A. M. Oliveira, M.P.
Teixeira, G. F. Borges, & M. J. Ferro (Eds.). Fechner Day 2004 (pp. 116-121). Coimbra,
Portugal: The International Society for Psychophysics.
♦Hubbard, T. L. (2008). Representational momentum contributes to motion induced
mislocalization of stationary objects. Visual Cognition, 16, 44-67.
♦Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial
memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.
♦Hubbard, T. L. (2008). Representational momentum as a new Gestalt principle. In B. A.
Schneider, B. M. Ben-David, S. Parker, & W. Wong. (Eds.), Fechner Day 2008.
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics
(pp. 333-338). Toronto, Canada: The International Society for Psychophysics.
♦Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2005). The stability and flexibility of spatial categories.
Cognitive Psychology, 50, 1-44.
♦Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2007). What counts as "by?" Young children's use of
relative distance to judge nearbyness. Developmental Psychology, 43, 121-133.
♦Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford
Books.
♦Huttenlocher, J., Duffy, S., & Levine, S. (2002). Infants and toddlers discriminate
amount: Are they measuring? Psychological Science, 13, 244-249.
♦Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S., & Vevea, J. (1998). Environmental input and cognitive
growth: A study using time-period comparisons. Child Development, 69, 1012-1029.
♦Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N., & Vasilyeva, M. (1999). Spatial scaling in young
children. Psychological Science, 10, 393-398.
♦Huttenlocher, J. & Vasilyeva, M. (2003). How toddlers represent enclosed spaces.
Cognitive Science, 27, 749-766.
♦Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Newcombe, N. & Duffy, S. (2008). Developing
symbolic capacities one step at a time. Cognition, 106, 1-12.
♦Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender Similarities: Implications for Science and
Mathematics Education. Science, 314, 599-600.
I

♦Ishikawa, T., Barnston, A. G., Kastens, K. A., Louchouarn, P., & Ropelewski, C. F.
(2005). Climate forecast maps as a communication and decision-support tool: An



empirical test with prospective policy makers. Cartography and Geographic Information
Science, 32, 3-16.
♦Ishikawa, T., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct
experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric
knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology, 52,
93-129.
♦Iverson, J.M. (1999). How to get to the cafeteria: Gesture and speech in blind and
sighted children's spatial descriptions. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1132-1142.
♦Iverson, J.M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). What's communication got to do with it?
Gesture in congenitally blind children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 453-467.
J













♦Jacobs, L., & Schenk, F. (2003). Unpacking the cognitive map: The parallel map theory
of hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 110, 285-315.
♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Berendt, B. (2005). What makes a route appear longer? An
experimental and computational perspective on features, route segmentation, and distance
Knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 A, 1390-1414.
♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Are children experts in spatial associate
learning? Experimental Psychology, 54, 236-242.
♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Developmental aspects of the laterality of ERP
effects during mental rotation. NeuroReport,18,175-178.
♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Wiedenbauer, G. (2004). The wayfinding ability and spatial
knowledge of adults and children in a colour coded building. Spatial Cognition and
Computation, 4,337-358.
♦Janzen, G. (2006). Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale
space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59/, 493-508.
♦Janzen, G. & van Turennout, M. (2004). Selective neural representation of objects
relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 673-677.
♦Janzen, G., Wagensveld, B., & van Turennout, M. (2007). Neural representation of
navigational relevance is rapidly induced and long-lasting. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 975-981.
♦Jefferies, M.E. and Yeap, W.K. (2008). (Eds.). Robotics and Cognitive Approaches to
Spatial Mapping, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.
♦Johnson, M.H. & Gilmore, R.O. (1998). Object-centered representations in 8-month-old
infants. Developmental Science, 1, 221-225.
♦Johnson, A., Seeland,K. D., & Redish, A. D. (2005). Reconstruction of the
postsubiculum head direction signal from neural ensembles. Hippocampus, 15, 86-96.
♦Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Heinze, H-J., Peters, M., & Jäncke, L. (2002). Women and
men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks.
Neuropsychologia, 40, 2397-2408.
♦Jordan, K., Wustenberg, T. Jaspers-Fayer, F., Fellbrich, A., and Peters, M. (2006). Sex
differences in left/right confusion. Cortex, 42, 69-78.
K
















♦Kali, Y. (2002). CILT2000: Visualization and Modeling. Journal of Science Education
and Technology, 11(3), 305-310.
♦Kali, Y. and Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception
of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 369-391.
♦Kali, Y., Orion, N. & Mazor, E. (1997). Software for assisting high school students in
the spatial perception of geological structures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 1021.
♦Kastens, K. A. and T. Ishikawa (2006). Spatial Thinking in the Geosciences and
Cognitive Sciences. In C. Manduca, D. Mogk and N. Stillings (Eds.), Earth and Mind,
Geological Society of America Special Paper 413 (pp. 53-76).
♦Kastens, K. A., Kaplan, D. and Christie-Blick, K. (2001). Development and evaluation
of a technology-supported map-skills curriculum, Where are We?. Journal of Geoscience
Education, 49(3), 249-266.
♦Kastens, K. A., and L. S. Liben (2007). Eliciting self-explanations improves children's
performance on a field-based map skills task. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 45-74.
♦Kaufman, J., Gilmore, R.O., & Johnson, M.H. (2006). Frames of reference for
anticipatory action in 4-month-old infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 29(3), 322333.
♦Keele, S.W., Ivry, R.B., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., and Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive
and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316-330.
♦Kelly, J.W., Avraamides, M.N. & Loomis, J.M. (in press). Sensorimotor alignment
effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition.
♦Kennerley, S.W., Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Semjen, A., and Ivry, R.B. (2002).
Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal and spatial uncoupling during continuous
bimanual movements. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 376-381.
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2004, March). Analyzing the Earth with Geographic Information
Systems. NSS News. Huntsville, AL: National Speleological Society.
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2006). Earth Visions: GIS in Indian Country. Winds of Change.
American Indian Science and Engineering Society.
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2007). GIS in Education. Chapter in Handbook of GIS. Blackwell
Publishers.
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2004). GIS for Citizenship Education, in Geography and Citizenship
Education: Research Perspectives. A. Kent and A. Powell (Eds.) (pp. 129-138). London,
UK: International Geographical Union Committee on Geographic Education by
University of London Institute of Education.
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2004). The Global GIS project: Spatial analysis for the world.
Interaction, 32(3).
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of GIS in secondary
education. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 128-137.














♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2002). Introducing Geography and Technology into Science through
Biodiversity. Meridian: A Middle School Technology Journal, 5(1).
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2006). Mapping for understanding our changing world. The Earth
Scientist, 22(1), 6-10.
♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2008). Toward An International Education Community, and
Challenges and Benefits to Teaching with Web-Based GIS. Two chapters in Digital
Geography. Information Age Publishing.
♦Kerski, Joseph J., Linn, S. and Gindele, R. (2005). Mapping standardised test scores
with other variables using GIS. International Research in Geographic and Environmental
Education, 14(3), 231–236.
♦Kerski, Joseph J., Palmer, R. and Palmer, A. (2005, July). Jungle classroom—
Geotechnology boosts education in Costa Rica’s lowland rainforest. GeoWorld, 18(7),
42-44.
♦Kita, S., & Ozyurek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic
coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of
spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16-32.
♦Kitayama, S., Duffy, S. & Uchida, Y. K. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In S.
Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), The Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 136-174). New
York: Guilford Press.
♦Klein, I., Dubois, J., Mangin, J.-F., Kherif, F., Flandin, G., Poline, J.-B., Denis, M.,
Kosslyn, S. M., & Le Bihan, D. (2004). Retinotopic organization of visual mental images
as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 2631.
♦Klenk, M., Forbus, K., Tomai, E., Kim,H., and Kyckelhahn, B. 2005. Solving Everyday
Physical Reasoning Problems by Analogy using Sketches. Proceedings of 20th National
Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), Pittsburgh, PA.
♦Klippel, A., Freksa, C., & Winter, S. (2006). The danger of getting lost- YAH maps in
emergencies. Journal of Spatial Sciences, 51, 1, 117-131.
♦Klippel, A., Knuf, L., Hommel, B., & Freksa, C. (2005). Perceptually induced
distortions in cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff & B. Krieg-Brueckner (Eds.),
Spatial Cognition IV. Reasoning, Action, and Interaction: International Conference
Spatial Cognition 2004, Frauenchiemsee, Germany, October 11-13, 2004, Revised
Selected Papers (pp. 204-213). Berlin: Springer.
♦Klippel, A., Lee, P. U., Fabrikant, S.I., Montello, D. R. & Bateman, J. (2005). The
Cognitive Conceptual Approach as a Leitmotif for Map Design. Proceedings of the
American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2005 Spring Symposium Series:
Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial
Assistance, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Mar. 21-23, 2005, 90-95.
♦Klippel, A., & Montello, D. R. (to appear). Linguistic and nonlinguistic turn direction
concepts. In S. Winter, M. Duckham, L. Kulik, & B. Kuipers (Eds.), Spatial Information
Theory. Berlin: Springer.
♦Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Kulik, L., & Lee, P. U. (2005). Wayfinding choremes - A
language for modeling conceptual route knowledge. Journal of Visual Languages and
Computing, 16(4), 311-329.



















♦Klippel, A., Tenbrink, T. and Montello, D. (in press). The Role of Structure and
Function in the Conceptualization of Directions. In E. van der Zee and M. Vulchanova
(Eds.), Motion Encoding in Language and Space. Oxford University Press.
♦Klippel, A., Worboys, M., & Duckham, M. (accepted). Identifying factors of geographic
event conceptualization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science.
♦Knauff, M. (1999). The cognitive adequacy of Allen's interval calculus for qualitative
spatial representation and reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 261-290.
♦Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., Ruff, C. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2003). Reasoning,
models, and images: Behavioral measures and cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 15, 559-573.
♦Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning.
Memory & Cognition, 30, 363-371.
♦Knauff, M., Jola, C., & Strube, G. (2001). Spatial reasoning: No need for visual
information. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Proceedings on the 6th International Conference
on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT 2001 (pp. 759-765). Berlin: Springer.
♦Knauff, M., Kassubek, J., Mulack, T., & Greenlee, M. W. (2000). Cortical activation
evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by functional MRI. NeuroReport, 11,
3957-3962.
♦Knauff, M., & May, E. (2006). Mental imagery, reasoning, and blindness. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 161-177.
♦Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R., & Greenlee, M. W. (2002). Spatial
imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 13,
203-212.
♦Knauff, M., Schlieder, C., & Freksa, C. (2002). Spatial cognition: From rat-research to
multifunctional spatial assistance systems. Künstliche Intelligenz, 3, 5-9.
♦Knauff, M., Strube, G., Jola, C., Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (2004). The psychological
validity of qualitative spatial reasoning in one dimension. Spatial Cognition and
Computation, 4, 167-188.
♦Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development
of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2797-2822.
♦Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M. & Mayer, R. (2002). Revisiting cognitive style
dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition & Instruction, 20, 37-77.
♦Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M. & Mayer, R. (2002). Visual/spatial abilities in problem
solving in physics. In M. Anderson, B. Meyer & P. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic
Representation and Reasoning (pp. 155-173). Springer-Verlag.
♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Hegarty, M. (2001). Dissociation between explicit and implicit
beliefs about objects motion. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 439-453.
♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Hegarty, M. (2001). Mental rotation and spatial orientation
abilities. Memory & Cognition. 29(5), 745-756.
♦Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers:
A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710-726.
♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Motes, M. (In Press). Spatial visualization in physics problem
solving. Cognitive Sciences.
♦Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. Rasch, B. & Blajenkova, O. (2006). Perspective-taking vs.
mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 397-417.





♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Thornton, R. (2006). Real-time data display, spatial visualization
ability, and learning force and motion concepts. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 15, 113-134.
♦Kuehne, S., Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Quinn, B. (August 2000). SEQL: Category
learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping. Proceedings of CogSci2000. Philadelphia, PA.
♦Kuhn, W., Worboys, M., & Timpf, S., eds., Spatial information theory: Foundations of
geographic information science, LNCS 2825, Springer, Berlin, 2003.
♦Kuipers, B. (2000). The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artificial Intelligence, 119, 191-233.
♦Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping.
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 417-446.
L












♦Laeng, B. & Peters, M. (1995). Cerebral Lateralization for the Processing of Spatial
Coordinates and Categories in Left- and Right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 33, 421-439.
♦Laeng, B., Peters, M., & McCabe, R. (1998). Memory for locations within regions:
Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 97-107.
♦Lakusta, L. & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial
language. Cognition, 96, 1-33.
♦Lakusta, L., Wagner,L., O'Hearn, K., & Landau, B. (2007). Conceptual Foundations of
Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants. Language Learning and
Development, 3(3), 179-197.
♦Lawton, C. A. (In press). Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In J. Chrisler & D.
McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York: Springer.
♦Lawton, C. A. & Hatcher, D. W. (2005). Gender differences in integration of images in
visuospatial memory. Sex Roles, 53, 717-725.
♦Lawton, C. A. & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and
anxiety about wayfinding: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47, 389-401.
♦Lawton, C. A. & Morrin, K. A. (1999). Gender differences in pointing accuracy in
computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles, 40, 73-92.
♦Lee, I., Griffin, A.L., Zilli, E.A., Eichenbaum, H., Hasselmo, M.E. (2006). Gradual
translocation of spatial correlates of neuronal firing in the hippocampus toward
prospective reward locations. Neuron, 51(5), 639-50.
♦Levin, D.T., & Simons, D.J. (2000). Fragmentation and continuity in motion pictures
and the real world. Media Psychology, 2, 357-380.
♦Lew, A.R., Bremner, J.G., & Lefkovitch, L. (2000). The development of relational
landmark use in 6- to 12-month-old infants in a spatial orientation task. Child
Development, 71, 1179-1190.
♦Lew, A. R., Foster, K. A. & Bremner, J. G. (2006). Disorientation inhibits landmark use
in 12-18-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 334-341.
















♦Lew, A. R., Foster, K., Bremner, J. G., Green, M. & Slavin, S. (2005). Detection of
geometric but not topological transformations in 6-12-month-old infants in a visual
exploration paradigm. Developmental Psychobiology, 47, 31-42.
♦Lew, A. R., Foster, K. A., Crowther, L. A. & Green, M. (2004). Indirect landmark use at
6 months of age in a spatial orientation task. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 8190.
♦Lew, A. R., Hopkins, B., Owen, L. H. & Green, M. (2007). Postural change effects on
infants' AB task performance: visual, postural or spatial? Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 97, 1-13.
♦Liben, L. S., Kastens, K. A., & Stevenson, L. M. (2002). Real-world knowledge through
real world maps: A developmental guide for navigating the educational terrain.
Developmental Review, 22, 267-322.
♦Lidster, W. & Bremner, J.G. (1999). Interpretation and construction of coordinate
dimensions by 4- to 5-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,
17, 189-201.
♦Liederman, J., Flannery, K.A., & Curley, J. (1997). Cryptorchidism (undescended
testes): A common malformation associated with neurobehavioral abnormalities. Child
Neuropsychology, 1, 1-13.
♦Linn, M. C. & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, and Peers: Science Learning
Partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
♦Linn, M.C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J.L. (2006). Teaching and
Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science. Science, 313, 1049-1050.
♦Linn, M. C. & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex
differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
♦Linn, S., Kerski, J. and Wither, S. (2005). Development of Evaluation Tools for GIS:
How Does GIS Affect Student Learning? International Research in Geographic and
Environmental Education, 14(3), 217–224.
♦Liu, Q., Qiu, J., Chen, A.T., Yang, J., Zhang, Q.L. & Sun, H.-J. (2007). Effect of visual
reliability on auditory-visual integration: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport,
18(17), 1861-1865.
♦Lockman, J. J. (2005). Tool use: Developmental and evolutionary considerations. In V.
Roux, & B. Bril (Eds.) Stone Knapping : The necessary conditions for a uniquely
hominid behaviour. McDonald Institute Monograph series. (pp. 319-330) London:
Cambridge.
♦Lockwood, K., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2005). SpaceCase: A model of spatial
preposition use. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science
Society. Stressa, Italy.
♦Lockwood, K., Forbus, K., Halstead, D. & Usher, J. (2006). Automatic Categorization
of Spatial Prepositions. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive
Science Society. Vancouver, Canada.
♦Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial mapping in preschoolers: Close
comparisons facilitate far mappings. Journal of Cognition & Development, 2, 189-219.
♦Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (in press). Relational language and the development of
relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology.











♦Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., Beschin, N., & Denis, M. (2005). Dissociating mental
transformations and visuo-spatial storage in working memory: Evidence from
representational neglect. Memory, 13, 430-434.
♦Logie, R. H., & Denis, M. (Eds.) (1991). Mental images in human cognition.
Amsterdam: North-Holland.
♦Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human
navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding: Cognitive mapping
and other spatial processes (pp. 125-151). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
♦Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Avraamides, M., Lippa, Y., & Golledge, R. G. (2007).
Functional equivalence of spatial images produced by perception and spatial language. In
F. Mast and L. Jäncke (Eds.), Spatial processing in navigation, imagery, and perception
(pp. 29-48). New York: Springer.
♦Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., Klatzky, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2007). Assisting
wayfinding in visually impaired travelers. In G. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition:
From research to cognitive technology (pp. 179-202). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
♦Lovett, A., Dehghani, M. & Forbus, K. (2008). Building and comparing qualitative
descriptions of three-dimensional design sketches. Proceedings of the 22nd International
Qualitative Reasoning Workshop. Boulder, CO.
♦Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2007). Using qualitative representations and
analogical mapping to solve problems from a spatial intelligence test. Proceedings of the
21st International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop. Aberystwyth, U.K.
♦Lovett, A. Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2007). Analogy with qualitative spatial
representations can simulate solving Raven's Progressive Matrices. Proceedings of the
29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Nashville, TN.
♦Lovett, A., Lockwood, K. & Forbus, K. (2008). Modeling cross-cultural performance on
the visual oddity task. Proceedings of Spatial Cognition 2008. Freiburg, Germany.
♦Lozano, S. C. and Tversky, B. (2006). Communicative gestures facilitate problem
solving for both communicators and recipients. Journal of Memory and Language, 55,
47-63.
♦Lyon, D. R., Gunzelmann, G., & Gluck, K. A. (2008). A computational model of spatial
visualization capacity. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 122-152.
M



♦MacDonald, S., Spetch. M.L., Kelly, D.M., & Cheng, K. (2004) Strategies in landmark
use by children, adults and marmoset monkeys. Learning and Motivation, 35, 322-347.
♦Maguire, M., Hirsh-Pasek & Golinkoff, R. (2006) A unified theory of word learning:
Putting verb acquisition in context. pp 364-392 In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff, Action
meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford University Press.
♦Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M. & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can
language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 108114.

















♦Manning, C., Sera, M., & Pick, H. L. Jr. (2002). Understanding how we think about
space: An examination of the meaning of English spatial prepositions. In K.R.Coventry
& P. Olivier (Eds.), Spatial Language: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, (pp.
147 - 164). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
♦Manns, J.R., Zilli, E.A., Ong, K.C., Hasselmo, M.E., Eichenbaum, H. (2007).
Hippocampal CA1 spiking during encoding and retrieval: Relation to theta phase.
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 87(1), 9-20.
♦Mark, D.M., Freksa, C., Hirtle, S.C., Lloyd, R., and Tversky, B. (1999). Cognitive
Models of Geographic Space. Int. J. of Geographical Information Science 13, 8, 747-774.
♦Matlock, T., Ramscar, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2005). The experiential link between
spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655-664.
♦May, M. (2007). Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: Effects of testing
method and setting. Psychological Research, 71, 277-287.
♦May, M. (2006). Raum (Space). In J. Funke & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbuch der
Allgemeinen Psychologie: Kognition (pp. 66-74). Gvttingen: Hogrefe.
♦May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments:
Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 163-206.
♦May, M. & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 169-186.
♦Maylor, E.A., Reimers, S., Choi, J., Collaer, M. L., Peters, M., & Silverman, I. (2007).
Gender and Sexual orientation differences in cognition across adulthood: Age is kinder to
women than to men regardress of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2),
235-249.
♦McCloskey, M. (2004). Spatial representations and multiple-visual-systems hypotheses:
Evidence from a developmental deficit in visual location and orientation processing.
Cortex, 40, 677-694.
♦McCloskey, M. (2001). Spatial representation in mind and brain. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What
deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology
(pp. 101-132). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
♦McCloskey, M. (in press). Visual reflections: A perceptual deficit and its implications.
New York: Oxford University Press.
♦McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2000). Attention-referenced visual representations:
Evidence from impaired visual localization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 26, 917-933.
♦McCloskey, M., Valtonen, J., & Sherman, J. (2006). Representing orientation: A
coordinate-system hypothesis and evidence from developmental deficits. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 23, 680-713.
♦Meilinger, T. (2008). The network of reference frames theory: A synthesis of graphs and
cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, N.S. Newcombe, P. Gärdenfors & S. Wölfl (Eds.), Spatial
Cognition VI (pp. 344-360). Berlin: Springer.
♦Meilinger, T., Knauff, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2008). Working memory in way-finding - a
dual task experiment in a virtual city. Cognitive Science, 32, 755-770.
♦Melinger, A., & Kita, S. (in press/2007). Conceptualization load triggers gesture
production. Language and Cognitive Processes.


















♦Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Crivello, F., Mazoyer, B., Denis, M., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.
(2002). Neural basis of mental scanning of a topographic representation built from a text.
Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1322-1330.
♦Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Ghaëm, O., Petit, L., Zago, L., Etard, O.,
Berthoz, A., Mazoyer, B., & Denis M. (2000). Neural correlates of topographic mental
exploration: The impact of route versus survey perspective learning. NeuroImage, 12,
588-600.
♦Mellet, E., Kosslyn, S. M., Mazoyer, N., Bricogne, S., Denis, M., & Mazoyer, B.
(2000). Functional anatomy of high resolution mental imagery. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 12, 98-109.
♦Mendoza, J.E., Elliott, D., Meegan, D.V., Lyons, J.L. & Welsh, T.N. (2006). The effect
of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 413-422.
♦Millar, S. (2002). Imagery and Blindness: Comment on Z.W. Pylyshyn: "Mental
Imagery: In search of a theory". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(2), 201-202.
♦Millar, S. (2005). Network Models for Haptic Perception. Infant Behavior and
Development, 28, 250-265.
♦Millar, S. (1997). Reading by Touch. London & N.Y.: Routledge [ISBN 0-415-068371].
♦Millar, S. (2008). Space and Sense. London & N.Y. Psychology Press. Taylor &
Francis.
♦Millar, S. (2006). Spatial Processing of Information from Touch and Movement:
Implications from and for Neuroscience. In M.A. Heller and S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Touch
and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience (pp. 25-48). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
♦Millar, S. (1994). Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and evidence from
studies with blind and sighted children. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford: Clarendon
Press [ISBN 0 19 852142 1].
♦Millar, S. (1999). Veering revisited: Noise and posture cues in walking without sight.
Perception, 28, 765-780.
♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2004). External and body-centred frames of reference in
spatial memory: Evidence from touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(1) 51-59.
♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2001). Illusions in reading maps by touch: Reducing distance
errors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 643-657.
♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2002). Müller-Lyer illusions in touch and vision: Implications
for Multisensory Processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(3), 353-365.
♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2003). Spatial reference and scanning with the left and right
hand. Perception, 32, 1499-1511.
♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2000). Vertical and bisection bias in active touch. Perception,
29, 481-500.
♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2005). What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing?
Brain and Cognition, 59, 258-268.
♦Mittelberg, I. (fc.). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In V.
Evans and P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and
New Directions. London: Equinox.












♦Mittelberg, I. (fc.). Peicean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in
gestural representations of grammar. In A. Cienki and C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and
Gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
♦Mittelberg, I. (2002). The Visual Memory of Grammar: Iconographical and
Metaphorical Insights. Metaphorik.de, 2, 69-89.
♦Mittelberg, I. and L. R. Waugh (fc.). Multimodal figures of thought: A cognitivesemiotic approach to metaphor and metonymy in co-speech gesture. In C. Forceville and
E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
♦Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Pick, H. L, Jr, & Warren, W. H.
(2007). Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed.
Experimental Brain Research, ISSN (Online) 1432-1106, ISSN (Print) 0014-4819.
♦Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge
handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 257-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
♦Montello, D. R. (2001). Spatial cognition. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.),
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 14771-14775).
Oxford: Pergamon Press.
♦Montello, D. R., Fabrikant, S. I., Ruocco, M. & Middleton, R. S. (2003). Testing the
First Law of Cognitive Geography on Point-Display Spatializations. In W. Kuhn, M.
Worboys, & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic
Information Science. Proceedings of the Conference on Spatial Information Theory
(COSIT '03). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2825 (pp. 316-331). Berlin, Germany:
Springer Verlag.
♦Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K. L., Golledge, R. G., & Self, C. M. (1999). Sex-related
differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of
the Association of American Geographers, 89, 515-534.
♦Montello, D. R., Waller, D., Hegarty, M., & Richardson, A. E. (2004). Spatial memory
of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human
spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 251-285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
♦Moore, S. D. and Brady, J.A. (2007). Lessons Learned from the ITEST Ocean Explorers
Project. In ESRI Education Users Conference. San Diego, California: ESRI.
♦Moratz, R. and Tenbrinkk, T. (2006). Spatial reference in linguistic human-robot
interaction: Iterative, empirically supported development of a model of projective
relations. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6(1), 63-106.
♦Motes, M., Finlay, C. & Kozhevnikov, M. (2006). Scene movement versus observer
movement in scene recognition: A test of the spatial updating hypothesis. Perception, 35,
1507-1520.
N



♦Nardini, M., Atkinson, J., & Burgess, N. (in press). Children reorient using the left /
right sense of coloured landmarks at 18-24 months. Cognition.
♦Nardini M., Burgess N., Breckenridge K., Atkinson J. (2006). Differential
developmental trajectories for egocentric, environmental and intrinsic frames of reference
in spatial memory. Cognition, 101, 153-172.
♦Novick, L. R. (2001). Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought. In
D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and
theory, Vol. 40 (pp. 279-325). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
O





♦Oakes, L. M., & Ribar, R. J. (in press). A comparison of infants' categorization in paired
and successive presentation familiarization tasks. Infancy.
♦Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2003). Top down
control of visual attention in object detection. IEEE Proceedings of the International
Conference on Image Processing, Vol I, 253-256.
♦Olson, D. R., & Bialystok, E. (1983). Spatial cognition: The structure and development
of the mental representation of spatial relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
♦Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., and Kali, Y. (1997). Relationship between Earth science
education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 129-132.
♦Otto, A.R., Gureckis, T.M., Love, B.C. & Markman, A.B. (in press, 2009). Navigating
through Abstract Decision Spaces: Evaluating the Role of State Knowledge in a Dynamic
Decision-Making Task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
P



♦Pack, C., Grossberg, S. and Mingolla, E. (2001). A neural model of smooth pursuit
control and motion perception by cortical area MST. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
13, 102-120.
♦Parish, J., Ma, W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R.M. (in press) A world of relations:
Relational words. In B. Malt & P. Wolf. Words and the world: How words capture the
human experience. Oxford University Press.
♦Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the
acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400.















♦Péruch, P., Belingard, L., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2000). Transfer of spatial knowledge
from virtual to real environments. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender
(Eds.), Spatial cognition II (pp. 253-264), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
♦Péruch, P., Chabanne, V., Nesa, M.-P., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Denis, M. (2006).
Comparing distances in mental images constructed from visual experience or verbal
descriptions: The impact of survey versus route perspective. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 59, 1950-1967.
♦Péruch, P., Gaunet, F., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Loomis, J. (2000). Understanding and
learning virtual spaces. In R. M. Kitchin & S. Freundschuh (Eds.), Cognitive Mapping:
Past, Present and Future (pp. 108-124). London: Routledge.
♦Péruch, P., & Wilson, P. N. (2004). Active versus passive learning and testing in a
complex outside built environment. Cognitive Processing, 5, 218-227.
♦Peters, M. (1997). Sex differences in intercepting a moving target by throw or button
press. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 290-296.
♦Peters, M., Chisholm, P., & Laeng, B. (1995). Spatial ability, student gender and
academic performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 69-73.
♦Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R. & Richardson, C. (1995).
A Redrawn Vandenberg & Kuse Mental Rotations Test: Different Versions and Factors
that affect Performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39-58.
♦Peters, M., Lehmann, W., Takahira, S., Takeuchi, Y., & Jordan, K. (2006). Mental
Rotation Test performance in four cross-cultural samples (n = 3367): Overall Sex
differences and the role of Academic Program in performance. Cortex, 42(7), 1005-1014.
♦Peters, M., Manning, J. T., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation,
and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
36(2), 251-260.
♦Peterson, S. & Simon, T.J. (2000) Computational evidence for the subitizing
phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture. Cognitive
Science, 24, 93-112.
♦Philbeck, J. W., Behrmann, M., Levy, L. & Potolicchio, Jr., S. J., & Caputy, A. J.
(2004). Path integration deficits during linear locomotion after human medial temporal
lobectomy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 510-520.
♦Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. K., Behrmann, M., Loomis, J. M., & Goodridge, J. (2001).
Active control of locomotion facilitates non-visual navigation. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 141-153.
♦Philbeck, J. W., & Loomis, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of perceived
egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 72-85.
♦Piburn, M., Reynolds, S., McAuliffe, C., Leedy, D., Birk, J. & Johnson, J. (2005). The
role of visualization in learning from computer-based images. International Journal of
Science Education, 27(5) 513-527.
♦Pick, H.L. Jr. (2007). History of research on blindness and brain plasticity. In J. J.
Rieser, Ashmead, D. H., Ebner, F., & Corn, A. L. (Eds.), Blindness and Brain Plasticity
in Navigation and Object Perception. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.









♦Pick, H. L., Jr., Rieser, J. J., Wagner, D., & Garing, A. E. (1999). The recalibration of
rotational locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 25, 1179-1188.
♦Plumert, J. M., & Hawkins, A. M. (2001). Biases in young children's communication
about spatial relations: Containment versus proximity. Child Development, 72, 22-36.
♦Plumert, J. M., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). The emerging spatial mind. New York: Oxford
University Press.
♦Pribe, C., Grossberg, S., and Cohen, M.A. (1997). Neural control of interlimb
oscillations, II: Biped and quadruped gaits and bifurcations. Biological Cybernetics, 77,
141-152.
♦Proffitt, D.R. (2006). Distance perception. Current Directions in Psychological
Research, 15, 131-135.
♦Proffitt, D.R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives in
Psychological Science, 1, 110-122.
♦Pruden, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (in press) Current events: How infants
parse events for language. In T. Shipley & J. Zachs (Eds.) Events. New York: Oxford
University Press.
♦Pulverman, R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Sootsman Buresh, J. (2008).
Manners matter: Infants' attention to manner and path in non-linguistic dynamic events.
Cognition, 108, 825-830.
♦Pulverman, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pruden, S., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2006). Precursors to
verb learning: Infant attention to manner and path. pp.134-160 In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R.
M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. New York: Oxford
Press.
Q





♦Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2003). The mental-cutting test "Schnitte" and the Picture-RotationTest: Two new measures to assess spatial ability. International Journal of Testing, 3,
219-231.
♦Quaiser-Pohl, C., Geiser, C., & Lehmann, W. (2006). The relationship between
computer-game preference, gender, and mental-rotation ability. Personality and
Individual Differences, 40, 609-619.
♦Quaiser-Pohl, C. & Jordan, K. (2004/2007). (Ed.). Warum Frauen glauben, sie könnten
nicht einparken: und Männer ihnen Recht geben. München: C.H. Beck/dtv.
♦Quaiser-Pohl, C. & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the
contributions of experience and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 72, 245-260.
♦Quaiser-Pohl, C., Lehmann, W. & Eid, M. (2004). The relationship between spatial
abilities and representations of large-scale space in children: A structural-equationmodelling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 95-107.
R

















♦Ragni, M. Knauff, M., & Nebel, B. (2005). A Computational Model for Spatial
Reasoning with Mental Models. In B. G. Bara & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the
27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 1797-1802). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
♦Rapp, D. N., Culpepper, S. A., Kirkby, K., & Morin, P. (in press). Fostering students'
comprehension of topographic maps. Journal of Geoscience Education.
♦Rapp, D. N., Klug, J. L., & Taylor, H. A. (2006). Character movement and the
representation of space during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 34, 12061220.
♦Rapp, D. N., & Taylor, H. A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of
mental representations for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 30, 988-1001.
♦Rapp, D. N., & Uttal, D. H. (2006). Understanding and enhancing visualizations: Two
models of collaboration between earth science and cognitive science. In C. A. Manduca
& D. W. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn About the
Earth (pp. 121-127). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America Press.
♦Rauh, R., Hagen, C., Knauff, M., Kuß, T., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (2005). Preferred
and Alternative Mental Models in Spatial Reasoning. Spatial Cognition and
Computation, 5, 239-269.
♦Redish, A.D. (1999). Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic
Memory, MIT Press.
♦Redish, A. D., Rosenzweig, E. S., Bohanick, J. D., McNaughton,B. L., Barnes, C. A.
(2000). Hippocampal ensemble activity realignment: Time vs. space. Journal of
Neuroscience, 20(24), 9289-9309.
♦Redish, A.D. and Touretzky, D.S. (1997). Cognitive Maps beyond the Hippocampus.
Hippocampus, 7(1), 15-35.
♦Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational
Psychologist, 41, 87-98.
♦Reed, S. K. (2005). From research to practice and back: The Animation Tutor project.
Educational Psychology Review, 17, 55-82.
♦Reed, S. K. (2008). Manipulating multimedia materials. In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive
effects of multimedia learning (pp. 51-66). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
♦Reed, S. K. (January, 2010). Thinking visually. New York: Taylor & Francis.
♦Reed, S. K. & Hoffman, B. (January, 2010). Animation Tutor [Instructional software].
New York: Taylor & Francis.
♦Reed, S. K. & Hoffman, B. (2004). Use of temporal and spatial information in
estimating event completion time. Memory & Cognition, 32, 271-282.
♦Regier, T. (1996). The human semantic potential: Spatial language and constrained
connectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
♦Regier, T., & Carlson, L.A. (2001). Grounding spatial language in perception: An
empirical and computational investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130,
273-298.














♦Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2007). Color naming reflects optimal partitions of
color space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 1436-1441. (2007).
♦Renz, J., Qualitative spatial reasoning with topological information, LNAI 2293,
Springer, Berlin, 2002.
♦Reynolds, S.J., Johnson, J.K., Piburn, M.D., Leedy, D.E, Coyan, J.A., & Busch, M.M.
(2005). Visualization in undergraduate geology courses. In Gilbert, J.K., (Ed.)
Visualization in Science Education. Springer.
♦Reynolds, S., Piburn, M., Johnson J., Leedy, D., Coyan, J., & Busch, M. (2004). The
Hidden Earth Curriculum Project: Spatial Visualization in Undergraduate Geoscience
Courses. In Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Washington, D.C.:
American Association for the Advancement of Science.
♦Reynolds, S., Piburn, M., Leedy, D., McAuliffe, C., Birk, J. & Johnson, J. (2006). The
Hidden Earth: Interactive, computer-based modules for geoscience learning. In Manduca,
C. & Mogk, D. (Eds.). Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn About the
Earth. Geological Society of America.
♦Riecke, B. E., Cunningham, D. W. & Bülthoff, H. H. (2006). Spatial updating in virtual
reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research, 71(3), 298-313.
♦Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Avraamides, M. N., von der Heyde, M. & Bülthoff,
H. H. (2006). Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual
reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 3(3), 194-216.
♦Riecke, B.E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bülthoff, H.H. (2005). Towards lean
and elegant self-motion simulation in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual
Reality, 131-138.
♦Riecke, B.E. and von der Heyde, M. (2002). Qualitative Modeling of Spatial Orientation
Processes using Logical Propositions: Interconnecting Spatial Presence, Spatial Updating,
Piloting, and Spatial Cognition (Technical Report 100). Tübingen, Germany: Max Planck
Institute for Biological Cybernetics.
♦Riecke, B., von der Heyde, M. and Bülthoff, H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for
triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied
Perception, 2(3), 183-215.
♦Riecke, B.E., van Veen, H.A.H.C. and Bülthoff, H.H. (2002). Visual homing is possible
without landmarks: A Path Integration Study in Virtual Reality. Presence: Teleoperators
and Virtual Environments, 11(5), 443-473.
♦Rieser, J. J. & Pick, H. L. Jr. (2007). Perception-Action-Representation Systems and
Using Movement to Update Spatial Orientation: What changes with learning and
development? In Plumert, J.M. & Spencer, J.P. (Eds.), The Emerging Spatial Mind. New
York: Oxford.
♦Rieser, J.J. and Pick, H.L. Jr. (2002). The Perception and Representation of Human
Locomotion. In W. Prinz and B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIX:
Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention and performance XIX. Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
♦Rinck, M., & Denis, M. (2004). The metrics of spatial distance traversed during mental
imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30,
1211-1218.












♦Robertson, L.C. (2003). Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Nature
Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 93-102.
♦Robertson, L.C. (2004). Space, Objects, Minds and Brains. New York: Psychology
Press (Francis & Taylor).
♦Robertson, L.C. & Brooks, J.L. (2006). Feature detection and spatial deficits. Visual
Cognition, 14, 851-862.
♦Robertson, L.C. & Kim, M.S. (1998). Effects of perceived space on spatial attention.
Psychological Science, 10, 76-79.
♦Rochat, P., & Hespos, S.J. (1996). Tracking and anticipation of invisible spatial
transformation by 4-8-month-old infants, Cognitive Development, 11, 3-17.
♦Rosenzweig, E. S., Redish, A. D., McNaughton, B. L., Barnes,C. A. (2003).
Hippocampal map realignment and spatial learning. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 609-615.
♦Ruddle, R. A. (2008). Generating trails automatically, to aid navigation when you revisit
an environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 17, 562-574.
♦Ruddle, R. A. (2009). How do people find information on a familiar website?.
Proceedings of the 23rd BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI'09),
262-268.
♦Ruddle, R. A. & Lessels, S. (2009). The benefits of using a walking interface to
navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,
16(1), 1-18. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1502800.1502805.
♦Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J. & Jones, D. M. (1997). Navigating buildings in "desk-top"
virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational
experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 143-159.
♦Ruddle, R. A., & Péruch, P. (2004). Effects of proprioceptive feedback and
environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments. International
Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 299-326.
♦Rüsseler, J., Scholz, J., Jordan, K., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2005). Mental rotation of letters,
pictures and three-dimensional objects in German dyslexic children. Journal of Child
Neuropsychology, 11, 497-512.
S




♦Sampanes, A.C., Tseng, P. and Bridgeman, B. (2008). The role of gist in scene
recognition. Vision Research, 48, 2275-2283.
♦Sanchez, C. A, & Wiley, J. (2007). Spatial Abilities and Learning Complex Scientific
Topics. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
♦Sander, E., Quaiser-Pohl, C. & Stigler, C. (2007, under review). Mental-Rotation
Ability of East and West German Students: The Role of Experiential and Attitudinal
Factors (Revised, Manuscript submitted for publication).
♦Sargent, J., Dopkins, S., Philbeck, J., & Arthur, J. (2008). Exploring the process of
progressive disorientation. Acta Psychologica, 129, 234-242.

















♦Sargent, J., Dopkins, S., Philbeck, J. & Modarres, R. (2008). Spatial memory during
progressive disorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 34(3), 602-615.
♦Sathian, K., Simon, T.J., Peterson, S., Patel, G., Hoffman, J.M., & Grafton, S.T. (1999)
Neural evidence linking object enumeration and visual attention. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 11, 36-51.
♦Schaal, A., Uttal, D., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2005, May). Children's
gestures provide insight into their mental representation of space. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the Midwest Psychological Association, Chicago.
♦Schmitzer-Torbert, N.C. (2007). Place- and response-learning in human virtual
navigation: Behavioral measures and gender differences. Behavioral Neuroscience,
121(2), 277-290.
♦Schmitzer-Torbert, N.C., and Redish, A.D. (2004). Neuronal activity in the rodent
dorsal striatum in sequential navigation: Separation of spatial and reward responses on
the multiple T task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(5), 2259-72.
♦Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F. & Barshi, I. (2004). Effects of instruction modality and
readback on accuracy in following navigation commands. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Applied, 10, 245-257.
♦Scholl, B.J., & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1999). Tracking multiple items though occlusion: Clues
to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.
♦Schwering, A., Bauer, C., Đorčeva, I., Gust, H., Krumnack, U. & Kühnberger, K.-U.
(2009). The Impact of Gestalt Principles on Solving Geometric Proportional Analogies.
In the Proceedings of the 2nd International Analogy Conference (ANALOGY09) Sofia,
Bulgaria, 404-413.
♦Schwering, A., Kühnberger, K.-U., Krumnack, U. & Gust, H. (2009). Spatial Cognition
of Geometric Figures in the Context of Proportional Analogies. In the Proceedings of the
Conference on Spatial Information Theory (Cosit 09) Aber Wrac'h, France, 18-35.
♦Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers - A cross-linguistic
comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108(2), 590-599.
♦Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability
in intellectually talented young adolescents: a 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604-614.
♦Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.
Science, 171, 701-703.
♦Sibley, D.F. (2005). Visual abilities and misconceptions about plate tectonics. Journal
Geoscience Education, 53, 471-477.
♦Siegle, J., Campos J.L., Mohler, B.J., Loomis, J.M. & Bülthoff, H.H (2009). Highprecision capture of perceived self-velocity during passive translations. Experimental
Brain Research, 195, 429-444.
♦Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex
differences: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 261-268.
♦Simon, T.J. (1998) Computational evidence for the foundations of numerical
competence. Developmental Science, 1, 71-78.
♦Simon, T.J. (1997) Reconceptualizing the origins of number knowledge: A "nonnumerical" account. Cognitive Development, 12, 349-372.

















♦Simon, T.J., Bearden, C.E., McDonald-McGinn, D., & Zackai, E. (2005) Visuospatial
and numerical cognitive deficits in children with Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion
Syndrome. Cortex, 41: 131-141.
♦Simon, T.J. & Vaishnavi, S. (1996) Subitizing & counting depend on different
attentional mechanisms: Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages. Perception &
Psychophysics, 58, 915-926.
♦Singer, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teachers'
gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85-89.
♦Smith, M., Piburn, M. & Reynolds,S.(1999). Research for Earth Science Learning.
Geotimes, 44,27, 35.
♦Spence, C., & Driver, J. (Eds.) (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
♦Spence, C., Pavani, F., Maravita, A., & Holmes, N. (in press). Multisensory
contributions to the representation of peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the
crossmodal congruency task. To appear in M. Lin (Ed.), Haptic rendering: Foundations,
algorithms, and applications. Wellesley, MA: AK Peters.
♦Spence, I. (1990). Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 16, 683-692.
♦Spence, I. & Krizel, P. (1994). Children's perception of proportion in graphs. Child
Development, 65, 1193-1213.
♦Spence, I., & Lewandowsky, S. (1989). Robust multidimensional scaling.
Psychometrika, 54, 501-513.
♦Spetch, M.L. & Kelly, D.M. (2006). Comparative spatial cognition: Processes in
landmark and surface-based place finding. In E. Wasserman and T. Zentall (Eds.),
Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence (pp. 210-228).
Oxford University Press.
♦Spetch, M.L. & Parent, M.B. (2006). Age and sex differences in children's spatial search
strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 807-812.
♦S. Srinivas (2007). Influence of Affect on Wayfinding. Conference on Spatial
Information Theory, Melbourne, Australia, 2007. Doctoral Colloquium.
♦S. Srinivas, S. C. Hirtle (2006). Knowledge Based Schematization of Route Directions.
In M. Raubal, H. J. Miller, A. U. Frank, M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Geographic Information
Science, Fourth International Conference, GIScience 2006, Extended Abstracts (pp. 28).
IfGI prints.
♦S. Srinivas, S.C. Hirtle (2006). Knowledge Based Schematization of Route Directions.
In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, D. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V, LNAI
4387. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
♦Stern, E., Aprea, C., & Ebner, H. G. (2003). Improving cross-content transfer in text
processing by means of active graphical representation. Learning and Instruction, 13,
191-203.
♦Stollinski, R., Schwering, A., Kühnberger, K.-U. & Krumnack, U. (2009). Structural
Alignment of Visual Stimuli Influences Human Object Categorization. In the
Proceedings of the 2nd International Analogy Conference (ANALOGY09) Sofia,
Bulgaria, 433-442.
♦Sturz, B. R., Bodily, K. D. & Katz, J. S. (2006). Evidence against integration of spatial
maps in humans. Animal Cognition, 9, 207-217.







♦Sturz, B. R., Bodily, K. D., Katz, J. S. & Kelly, D. M. (in press). Evidence against
integration of spatial maps in humans: Generality across real and virtual environments.
Animal Cognition.
♦Sturz, B. R., Brown, M. F. & Kelly, D. M. (in press). Facilitation of learning spatial
relations among locations by visual cues: Implications for theoretical accounts of spatial
learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
♦Sturz, B. R. & Katz, J. S. (in press). Learning of absolute and relative distance and
direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of
Comparative Psychology.
♦Sun, H.-J., Campos, J. L. & Chan, G. S. W. (2004). Multisensory integration in the
estimation of relative path length. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 246-254.
♦Sun, H.-J., Campos, J. L., Chan, G. S. W. Young, M., & Ellard, C. (2004). The
contributions of static visual cues, nonvisual cues and optic flow in distance estimation.
Perception, 33, 49-65.
♦Sun, H.-J., Chan, G. S. W., & Campos, J. L. (2004). Active navigation and orientationfree spatial representations. Memory and Cognition, 32, 51-71.
♦Sun, H.-J., & Frost, B. J. (1998). Computation of different optical variables of looming
objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 296-303. Written up
in "News and Views" section of Nature Neuroscience, 1, 261-263.
T







♦Takayama, K. (2005). Teaching visualizing the science of genomics. In John K. Gilbert
(Ed.), Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp 217-251.
♦Tao, WD, Liu, Q., Huang, XT, Tao, XL, Yan, JJ, Teeter, CJ, Li, H. & Sun, H-J. (2008).
Effect of degree and direction of rotation in egocentric mental rotation of hand: An eventrelated potential study. NeuroReport, 19.
♦Tartre, L.A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal
for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), pp. 216- 229.
♦Tartre, L.A. (1990). Spatial skills, gender and mathematics. In E. Fennema and G. Leder
(Eds.), Mathematics and Gender (pp. 27- 59). New York: Teachers' College Press.
♦Tartre, L.A. & Fennema, E. (1995). Mathematics achievement and gender: A
longitudinal study of selected cognitive and affective factors [grades 6 to 12].
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28(3), 199-217.
♦Taylor, H. A., Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, S. (in press). Wayfinding and navigation: Mental
representation and implications for navigational system design. To appear in C. M.
Carswell (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Volume 4. Santa Monica,
CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
♦Taylor, H. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Updating human spatial memory. In M. F. Brown
and R. G. Cook (Eds.), Animal Spatial Cognition: Comparative, Neural, and
Computational Approaches.

















♦Taylor, H. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2004). Where's the donut? Factors influencing spatial
reference frame use. Cognitive Processing: The International Quarterly of Cognitive
Science, 5, 175-188.
♦Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language: An investigation of
relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
♦Tenbrink, T. and Wiener, J. (in press). The Verbalization of Multiple Strategies in the
Traveling Salesman Problem. Cognitive Processing. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-008-0225-z
♦Thomson, R. & Davies, J. (in press, 2009). Distance Estimation as a Process of
Generating Ad-Hoc Metrical Systems. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
♦Tom, A., & Denis, M. (2004). Language and spatial cognition: Comparing the roles of
landmarks and street names in route instructions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18,
1213-1230.
♦Tomai, E., Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2005). A Structure Mapping Model for
Solving Geometric Analogy Problems. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society, Stressa, Italy, 2190-2195.
♦Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2006). Contextual
guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features
in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
♦Turnbull, D. (1994). Maps are territories, science is an atlas. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
♦Tversky, B. (In press). Communicating with diagrams and gestures. In C. Najaran
(Editor).
♦Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah
& A. Miyake (Editors.), Handbook of higher-level visuospatial thinking. 1-34.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
♦Tversky, B. (2007). Gestalts of thought. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Visual thought (pp. 155163). Amsterdam: Benjamin.
♦Tversky, B. (2005). Some ways images express and promote thought. In P. Grialou, G.
Longo, and M. Okada, Image and reasoning. Pp. 15-29. Tokyo: Keio University Press.
♦Tversky, B. (In press). Spatial cognition: Situated and embodied. In P. Robbins and M.
Aydede (Editor). Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
♦Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. Holyoak and R. Morrison, (Editors).
Handbook of Reasoniong (pp. 209-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
♦Tversky, B., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Lee, P. U., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Stolte, C.,
Daniele, M.-P. (In press). Cognitive design principles for automated generation of
visualizations. In G. Allen (Editor). Applied spatial cognition: From research to
cognitive technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
♦Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S., MacKenzie, R., and Morrison, J. (In press).
Enriching animations. In R. Lowe and W. Schnotz (Editors). Learning with animation.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
♦Tversky, B. and Lozano, S. C. Gestures augment learning in communicators and
recipients. In K. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, and J. Bateman (Editors), Spatial language and
dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
U





♦Uttal, D. (2000). Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial
cognition. Developmental Science, 3, 247-286.
♦Uttal, D. H. (in press). Maps and spatial thinking: Developmental, cultural and historical
perspectives. To appear in L. Namy (Ed.), Symbols and thought: Proceedings of the
Emory cognition conference. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
♦Uttal, D. (2000). Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial
cognition. Developmental Science, 3, 247-286.
♦Uttal, D. H., Fisher, J. A., & Taylor, H. A. (in press). Words and maps: Developmental
changes in mental models of spatial information acquired from depictions and
descriptions. Developmental Science.
♦Uttal, D. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1989). Young children's representation of spatial
information acquired from maps. Developmental Psychology, 25, 128-138.
V









♦Valtonen, J., Dilks, D. D., & McCloskey, M. (2008). Cognitive representation of
orientation: A case study. Cortex, in press.
♦Varley, R., Klessinger, N., Romanowski, C. & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but
numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 3519-3524.
♦Varley, R. & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal
reasoning and "theory of mind" in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology, 10,
723-726.
♦Varley, R., Siegal, M. & Want, S. (2001). Severe impairment in grammar does not
preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 7, 489-493.
♦Vasilyeva, M. (2002). Solving spatial tasks with unaligned layouts: The difficulty of
dealing with conflicting information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 291303.
♦Vasilyeva, M., Duffy, S. & Huttenlocher, J. (2007). Developmental changes in the use
of absolute and relative information: The case of spatial extent. Journal of Cognition and
Development, 8, 455-471.
♦Vasilyeva, M. & Huttenlocher, J. (2004). Early development of scaling ability.
Developmental Psychology, 40, 682-690.
♦Verges, M. & Duffy, S. (under review). Spatial representations elicit dual-coding effects
in mental imagery. Cognitive Science.
♦Vorwerg, C. and Tenbrink,T. (2007). Discourse factors influencing spatial descriptions
in English and German. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, and D. Montello (Eds.),
Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction (pp. 470–488). Berlin: Springer.




♦Vosmik, J.R., & Presson, C.C. (2004). Children's response to natural map misalignment
during wayfinding. Journal of Cognition & Development, 5, 317-336.
♦Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences
in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 2338.
♦Voyer, D., Butler, T., Cordero, J., Brake, B., Silbersweig, D., Stern, E., & ImperatoMcGinley, J. (2006). The Relation between Computerized and Paper-and-Pencil Mental
Rotation Tasks: A Validation Study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental
Neuropsychology, 28, 928-939.
♦Voyer, D. & Hou, J. (2006). Type of items and the magnitude of gender differences on
the Mental Rotations Test. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 91-100.
W












♦Wagner, L., A. Yocom, M. Greene-Havas (in press). Children's Understanding of
Directed Motion Events in an Imitation Choice Task. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology.
♦Wagner, S.,M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The role of gesture in learning: Do
children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development.
♦Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental
representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50,
395-407.
♦Waller, D., Bachmann, E., Hodgson, E., & Beall, A. C. (in press). The HIVE: A Huge
Immersive Virtual Environment for research in spatial cognition. Behavior Research
Methods.
♦Waller, D., Beall, A., & Loomis, J. M. (2004). Using virtual environments to assess
directional knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 157-163.
♦Waller, D., & Hodgson, E. (2006). Transient and enduring spatial representations under
disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
& Cognition, 32, 867–882.
♦Waller, D., Knapp, D., & Hunt, E. (2001). Spatial representations of virtual mazes: The
role of visual fidelity and individual differences. Human Factors, 43, 147 - 158.
♦Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., & Beall, A. C. (2000). Place learning in
humans: The role of distance and direction information. Spatial Cognition and
Computation, 2, 333-354.
♦Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., & Steck, S. D. (2003). Inertial cues do not enhance
knowledge of environmental layout. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 987-993.
♦Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 376-382.
♦Weckbacher, L. M. (2006). The role of spatial activities in gifted youths' spatial
understanding. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
♦Weckbacher, L. M. (2007). The role of visualization in geometric problem solving.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
















♦Weckbacher, L. M. & Okamoto, Y. (2009). Exploring the relation between spatial
Experience and spatial ability among high academic achievers. Poster presented at The
Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego,
California.
♦Welsh, T.N. & Elliott, D. (2004). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting
stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology – Section A, 57, 1031-1057.
♦Welsh, T.N., Higgins, L., Ray, M. & Weeks, D.J. (2007). Seeing vs. believing: Is
believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation? Human
Movement Science, 26, 853-866.
♦Welsh, T.N. & Pratt, J. (2008). Actions modulate attentional capture. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 61, 968-976.
♦Welsh, T.N., Lyons, J., Weeks, D.J., Anson, J.G., Chua, R., Mendoza, J.E. & Elliott, D.
(2007). Within- and between-nervous system inhibition of return: Observation is as good
as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 950-956.
♦Welsh, T.N., Ray, M., Weeks, D.J., Dewey, D. & Elliott, D. (2009). Does Joe influence
Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Research, 1248, 141-148.
♦Wetzel, J. & Forbus, K. (2009, February). Automated Critique of Engineering Design
Explanations. Poster presented at the Second Annual Inter-Science of Learning Center
Conference, Seattle, WA.
♦Wetzel, J. (2008). Design Buddy: Sketch-Understanding Software as a Tool for
Engineering Design Education. Poster presented at the 2008 inter-Science of Learning
Centers Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
♦Wetzel, J. and Forbus, K. (2008). Integrating Open-Domain Sketch Understanding with
Qualitative Two-Dimensional Rigid-Body Mechanics. Proceedings of the 22nd
International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning. Boulder, CO.
♦Wiedenbauer, G., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2006). Spatial knowledge of children with
spina bifida in a virtual large scale space. Brain and Cognition, 62, 120-127.
♦Wiener, J., & Tenbrink, T. (2008). Traveling salesman problem: The human case.
Künstliche Intelligenz: KI und Kognition, 18-22.
♦Wiener, J., Tenbrink, T., Henschel, J. and Hölscher, C. (2008). Situated and Prospective
Path Planning: Route Choice in an Urban Environment. CogSci 2008: 30th Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, July 23 – 26, Washington, D.C.
♦Wiley, J. (2003). Cognitive and educational implications of visually-rich media: Images
and imagination. In M. Hocks and M. Kendrick (Eds.), Eloquent images: Word and
Image in the Age of New Media. MIT Press.
♦Wilson, P.N., & Péruch, P. (2002). The influence of interactivity and attention on spatial
learing in a desk-top virtual environment. Current Psychology of Cognition, 21, 601-633.
♦Wolbers, T. & Büchel, C. (2005). Dissociable retrosplenial and hippocampal
contributions to successful formation of survey representations. Journal of Neuroscience,
25(13), 3333-3340.
♦Wolbers, T., Hegarty, M., Büchel, C. & Loomis, J. (2008). Spatial updating: how the
brain keeps track of changing object locations during observer motion. Nature
Neuroscience, 11(10), 1223-1230.









♦Wolbers, T., Schoell, E. & Büchel, C. (2006). The predictive value of white matter
organization in posterior parietal cortex for spatial visualization ability. NeuroImage,
32(3), 1450-1455.
♦Wolbers, T., Weiller, C. & Büchel, C. (2004). Neural foundations of emerging route
knowledge in complex spatial environments. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 401-411.
♦Wolbers, T., Weiller, C. & Büchel, C. (2003). Contralateral coding of imagined body
parts in the superior parietal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 392-399.
♦Wolbers, T., Wiener, J.M., Mallot, H.A. & Büchel, C. (2007). Differential recruitment
of the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and the human motion complex during
path integration in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(35), 9408-9416.
♦Wolter, D., Freksa, C. and Latecki, L. J. (2008). Towards a Generalization of SelfLocalization. In M. E. Jefferies and W. K. Yeap, (Ed.), Robot and Cognitive Approaches
to Spatial Mapping, Series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Vol. 38. Springer
Verlag.
♦Wong, C.K., Schmidt, J. and Yeap, W.K. (2007). Using a Mobile Robot for Cognitive
Mapping. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(IJCAI), 2243-2248.
♦Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press.
♦Wood, G. & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Numbers, space, and action - from finger counting
to the mental number line and beyond. Cortex, 44, 353-358.
♦Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., Willmes, K. & Fischer, M. H. (in press). On the cognitive link
between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC Effect. Psychology Science.
X


♦Xu, Y. & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual shortterm memory for objects. Nature, 440, 91-95.
♦Xu, Y. & Nakayama, K. (2007). Visual short-term memory benefit for objects on
different 3D surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 653-662.
Y



♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (in press). Orientation dependence of spatial memory
acquired from auditory experience. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (2007). Path information effects in visual and
proprioceptive spatial learning. Acta Psychologica, 125, 346-360.
♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (in press). Sequential versus simultaneous viewing of
an environment: Effects of focal attention to individual object locations on visual spatial
learning. Visual Cognition.




♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (2005). Visual and proprioceptive representations in
spatial memory. Memory & Cognition, 33, 140-150.
♦Yeap W.K. (2007). From Spatial Perception to Cognitive Maps: How is the flow of
information controlled? In H. Schultheis, T. Barkowsky, B. Kuipers and B. Hommel
(Eds.), Control Mechanisms for Spatial Knowledge Processing in Cognitive/Intelligent
Systems, (pp. 59-61). AAAI Press.
♦Yeap, W.K. and Jefferies, M. (2000). On early cognitive mapping. Spatial Cognition
and Computation, 2, 85-116.
♦Yeap, W.K. and Jefferies, M. (1999). Computing a representation of the local
environment. Artificial Intelligence, 107, 219-263.
Z







♦Zacks, J. M., Mires, J., Tversky, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2002). Mental spatial
transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(4),
315-322.
♦ Zacks, J. M., Vettel, J. M., Michelon, P. (2003). Imagined Viewer and Object Rotations
Dissociated with Event-Related fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 10021018.
♦ Zacks, J. M., & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images.
Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(2), 96-118.
♦ Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery:
Transformations of objects and bodies. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 271306.
♦Zimmermann K, Freksa, C, Qualitative spatial reasoning using orientation, distance, and
path knowledge. Applied Intelligence 6 (1996) 49-58.
♦Zosh, J. M. & Feigenson, L. (2009). Beyond 'what' and 'how many': Capacity,
complexity, and resolution of infants' object representations. In B. Hood & L. Santos
(Eds.), The Origins of Object Knowledge (pp. 25-51). New York: Oxford University
Press.
♦Zur, O. (2005) Analogical reasoning as a learning mechanism in the domain of number.
Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, April.