The Royal Parks Business Plan 2012/13 Purpose To manage the Royal Parks effectively and efficiently, balancing the responsibility to conserve and enhance the unique environments with creative policies to encourage access and to increase opportunities for enjoyment, education, entertainment and healthy recreation. Context Over the period of this plan The Royal Parks (TRP) will face significant organisational and financial challenges. The Agency will be hosting eleven Olympic and Paralympic events over the summer in six of the eight Royal Parks. In addition there will be a large number of related events including a “Live Site” in Hyde Park which will operate every day throughout the Olympics. TRP will also be playing an important role in HM the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee celebrations in May and June. In addition to the activities in the Mall and St James’s Park, other central Royal Parks will also host celebratory activities. TRP is developing resourcing plans to ensure that it can meet the challenges of these events. TRP continues to operate within significantly reduced grant and seeks to improve efficiencies, increase earned income, get best value from its contracts and maintain high quality parks for this and future generations. TRP continues to work with event organisers to ensure that access to the parks is maintained as much as possible over the summer and that reinstatement plans are funded by event organisers and implemented post events. Finance The economic climate remains difficult and this is a challenging time for TRP. There has been a reduction in the number of core staff and the consequential restructure is being implemented. There is a risk that further cuts will be required and TRP must be ready to absorb these in a way that minimises the impact on the estate and on visitors. TRP relies on three main sources of income – Government grant (c. 11,304 in 2011/12), self-generated income (c. £17.6m), and grants from other sources (c. £1.1m). The grant from Government has been reducing over time and the amount of self -generated income has been increasing to a point where the Agency now generates more than half of its income. Tensions remain between those who believe that too much commercialisation threatens the intrinsic qualities of the parks and those who accept that unless more income is generated investment in the green spaces and park infrastructure will reduce and the quality of the parks could decline. The ongoing challenge for the Agency during the year ahead is to ensure that a balance is struck that allows income growth without damaging the core qualities of the parks. Following the decision in February 2012 by Westminster City Council, TRP’s entertainment venue licence for Hyde Park was reduced from thirteen to nine major events a year. The Agency will be reviewing its activities in this area and will produce a new events strategy in the coming year with the agreement of TRP’s Board. Governance The Governance changes announced at the end of last year have been implemented. A new strategic Board appointed by the Mayor of London and with representatives from Local 1 Authorities is in place. The Board oversees the operation of the Agency and will ensure that the views of stakeholders are reflected when key decisions are made. The Agency will develop a new strategy over the period with proposals on how to improve engagement with those who use the parks. Customer Focus Collectively, the Royal Parks are the most visited attraction in the UK and the agency has a strengthening focus on the wants and needs of visitors. The most recent Customer survey results suggested a satisfaction rate of around 96% and we will work to maintain this standard. Working with Others The Agency works with a range of different organisations to help us enhance the parks, maintain and improve the park environment and biodiversity, deliver improved services and facilities and meet our statutory obligations. These include The GLA, Local Authorities, DCMS, the Heritage Lottery Fund, LOCOG, Transport for London, the Environment Agency, the Metropolitan Police, Natural England, The Royal Parks Guild, Friends of the Parks and the Royal Parks Foundation. Our relationship with these and many other organisations will be especially important in the year ahead given the level of activity in the estate. For the Olympics and Paralympics the whole of London will need to have strong partnerships to deliver the Games and associated activities successfully. Building on existing partnerships will be essential in the lead up and delivery of the Games. We will look in particular to build closer relations with the Mayor and GLA during 2012/13 in order to ensure that the parks are protected. The Agency and TRP’s Board will work with the Royal Parks Foundation to develop a complementary approach to philanthropy and fund raising. During 2012, LOCOG will rely on a large team of volunteers to support the Games activities across London and including in the TRP estate. TRP’s own volunteer programme will continue to operate in the year ahead and the Agency will be looking at lessons learned following the Games to help inform its own approach to volunteering. Major Projects TRP will continue to manage its Better Buildings Programme to ensure best value from its estate and the generation of income. This includes the refurbishment and renting of redundant park lodges and taking forward a tender exercise for the Hyde Park Nursery. A grant from the HLF has secured a project to enhance the Isabella Plantation in Richmond Park and TRP will work to deliver the project in the year ahead. The project to improve the golf provision at Richmond Park will continue in the year ahead with the new clubhouse expected to be completed by March 2013. TRP has identified funding to reinstall the Henry Moore Arch to its original location in Kensington Gardens and this will be installed in time for the London Olympics. The refurbished Magazine in Kensington Gardens will open within the period of this plan as a new visual arts space under the management of the Serpentine Gallery. This will be a significant cultural addition to the estate and will include an extension designed by Zaha Hadid. 2 Corporate Objectives 1. Conserve and enhance the natural and built environment, historic landscape and biodiversity of the parks for the benefit of our diverse audiences and future generations. 2. Strengthen the organisation and its effectiveness by continuing to deliver better value for money and exploring commercial opportunities. Key Performance Targets 1. Maintain Green Flag status in all parks. 2. Work with delivery partners to host the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee celebrations across four Royal Parks. 3. Host eleven Olympic and Paralympic events in six Royal Parks in 2012 and work with event organisers to ensure that plans to reinstate the Parks post Games are implemented. Resources and expenditure 2012/13 Resource Budget £k Income DCMS Grant-in-Aid- current year DCMS Grant-in- Aid- funding to pay prior year creditors Capital Catering Event Fees Licenses & Rents Car parking Other Total income 18,318 5,096 819 2,659 4,880 2,739 1,182 5,941 41,634 Expenditure Salaries – Administration & Operational Support costs Landscape Maintenance Works Maintenance Nursery & Other Horticulture Service Contracts Other Operating Costs Capital Expenditure Non Cash Charges Total Expenditure Creditors- Grant in Aid Total 5,508 2,764 8,503 6,446 1,874 1,108 6,354 1,781 2,200 36,538 5,096 41,634 3 Strategic Risks The agency uses a risk maturity model to measure progress on our approach to risk management and determining how well we have embedded our processes. Consideration of risk has been a key issue in the formulation of our plans. CO1 STRATEGIC RISK Lack of resource capacity to meet all our obligations and also make a positive impact Loss of status eg, ISO14001 and Richmond Park National Nature Reserve Increased disease and pestilence on wildlife & trees reduces beneficial habitat and impact on biodiversity Increased use or change of use by visitors damages landscapes CO2 Hosting London 2012 Olympic & Paralympic Games has negative impact on perceptions: increased negative media, greater number of complaints, lower levels of satisfaction Major accident or incident at event or attraction brings Health and Safety into question and impacts on reputation 4 MITIGATION APPROACH Park Managers monitor progress against Park Plans Director of Parks & CEO have regular visits to Parks Monitor impact of climate change and visitors Engage with DCMS, Natural England, etc on best practice Monitor DEFRA guidance Daily monitoring by wildlife officers Regular monitoring by Ecologist for the Oak Processionary Moth Regular inspections for Massaria Programme of work to inhibit algae blooms in the Serpentine Monitoring of changes by Park Managers (e.g. desire lines) and take action as necessary Olympic contracts provide for reinstatement funding Regular meetings with stakeholders, LOCOG and Boroughs Engage with and monitor media Media training given to senior staff Good pre-planning On-site monitoring during events Debrief after events CO3 Unable to find funding for identified key projects Manage budgets closely Regular monitoring by ExCom & Board CEO to liaise with Foundation over future funding requirements and priorities. DCMS funding for resources LOCOG contractual requirement for reinstatement funding Continual reporting and post games review Monitor Police and Park Management Reports Use Safer Parks Panel meetings to target police operations Regular review of estate Prioritisation of maintenance Backlog maintenance report to be refreshed Failure of contractors to meet defined service level of contract requires more direct staff involvement Park Managers monitor contractor KPIs Regular meetings with Director of Estates Economic downturn impacts on income and increases bad debtors and ability to deliver greater value for money EXCOM monitor income and bad debts monthly New income streams sought to grow external income Local Authorities restrict our ability to hold events Stakeholder management plan Careful monitoring of events Stakeholder meetings Regular reforecasts to DCMS Develop contingency plans and prioritise projects Secure funding for Jubilee celebrations Failure to negotiate cost neutral or better settlement for Olympic Games Increase in anti-social behaviour and damage CO4 CO5 Major infra-structure failure in year requiring diversion of other funding allocation Funding from DCMS is further cut or future funding reductions require in year action to reduce operational costs 5 New projects/activities are seen as controversial with certain groups of users CO6 Stakeholder meetings and engagement Enhanced use of web engagement Benchmark with similar land owners Review against OGC rates. Strategic plan of procurements and review scope of tender activities Failure to scope/manage projects effectively Regular monitoring by PAG and Programme Boards Failure to invest in staff or reward performance, recruitment restrictions limit ability to match skills with roles Monitor occasions when advertised posts go unfilled Review succession plans Monitor reasons for resignations Review and amendment of procedures Provision of training and use of civil service on line training. Whistle Blowing policy Training Equipment Audits Publish transparency reports On-going review Undertake independent assessment Failure to get best vfm from contracts Inadequate procedures and training Inappropriate use of IT and consequential possible loss GSI accreditation and/or paper loss Failure to operate new finance system and finalise reporting, failing to provide new transparency reports Failure to meet Cabinet Office Information Assurance Compliance Review 6