1 DPS School Performance Framework Whitepaper Response DPS School Performance Framework: Potential Weight and Structure Changes May 2014 Overview Denver Public Schools has shown substantial gains in student achievement over the past several years – with the highest rate of student growth among Colorado’s largest school districts for the past two years. However, many DPS schools still have low student achievement (status) relative to state performance and achievement gaps persist district-wide. Over the past five years, the SPF has evolved with the addition of new important measures of accountability. Additionally, a number of shifts in the weighting structure in the SPF have resulted in the framework putting a greater emphasis on growth versus status in the years since it was first introduced. The SPF currently has a growth to status ratio of 3:1 for elementary schools and middle schools, and 2:1 for high schools. As a result, DPS leadership collaborated with district staff, principals, teachers, parents and community members and organizations throughout the Denver community to collect feedback on the following changes to its School Performance Framework (SPF)1 potentially for the 2014-15 SPF release: 1 The proposed changes are only for the Traditional SPF (this excludes DPS’ Intensive Pathway Schools). See Appendix A for the list of SPF measures. Adding more weight to status measures in the SPF in part by adding more measures and weight to K-3 grade related SPF measures The recommendation for higher weight on status emphasizes the importance of students being at or above grade level. By contrast, the argument for higher weight on growth stresses that schools should not benefit from or be disadvantaged by the status levels at which students enter that school; what is important is how much academic progress they make. Decreasing the weight on growth and increasing the weight on status will, on average, increase points earned by lower poverty schools and decrease points earned by higher poverty schools, at least in the short term. For additional details on the changes that were proposed click here. Feedback DPS conducted several focus group meetings that resulted in feedback on the proposed SPF changes from 192 stakeholders which included central office staff, DPS board members, principals, teachers, parents and community organization across Denver. DPS would like to thank everyone who participated to share their thoughts and insights on the proposed changes to the SPF. Nearly all focus group participants were in favor of increasing the weight of SPF measures that focus on the achievement of students in grades K-3. The participants expressed the importance of increased focus on the early grades, including 2 DPS School Performance Framework Whitepaper Response resources and supports to ensure that students in grades K-3 reach proficiency. The majority of participants also supported the proposal to add more weight to select SPF status measures, citing the need to accelerate the pace to increase DPS student achievement throughout the district. Increased emphasis on and accountability for closing student achievements gaps, along with more transparency in SPF reporting were additional areas of concern frequently expressed during feedback sessions. Next Steps During our focus groups we heard additional points of feedback not directly related to the two areas we initially raised. Furthermore, the DPS board and senior leadership team have developed a new Denver Plan (click here for the draft plan), which lays out clear goals for student achievement - including aggressive goals around closing the achievement gap and school performance. Finally, we are expecting significant changes to come with the new PARCC assessments and will need to ensure these changes are appropriately reflected in the SPF. For these reasons, DPS will move forward with the following next steps. For the 2013-14 SPF, released in the fall of 2014, DPS will add additional information regarding achievement gaps and student performance on each school’s SPF to increase transparency. Shortly after the 2014 SPF release, DPS will provide schools with a preview of the new 2015 SPF by applying for illustrative purposes only the 2015 SPF weighting structure to their 2013-14 results. DPS will also engage in broader conversations this fall around the 2015 SPF with a particular area of focus: Does the SPF effectively reflect achievement gaps among groups of students across DPS schools? Please check the DPS SPF website for updates and submit any related questions, comments or concerns to spf@dpsk12.org. Your feedback is valuable to DPS and greatly appreciated.