Educator Evaluation Program Components Evaluation Tool Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Evaluation Procedures All certified educators (teachers/counselors/library-media specialists/insructional coaches) will be evaluated each year. Each evaluation will consist of two unannounced 30-minute observations and the evaluation of documents. Evaluations will be conducted by administrators and an outside evaluation team. Site administrators will conduct the classroom observations. A contracted evaluation team will conduct the document evaluations. Educator Evaluation Components 2 Classroom Observations (1 video required) 2 Post-Observation Conferences Submission of Artifacts Artifact Evaluation Conference Self -Assessment Evaluation Summary Conference Professional Learning Plan 1. Classroom Observations At least one 30 minute unannounced observations will be conducted on all educators each semester. The administrator conducting the observation will make a copy of the observation notes, and give to the educator. (within 1 work day of observation) Using the observation notes, the administrator and educator (separately) look at the levels of performance by component for each domain and highlight or circle the relevant part(s) of each statement. Looking at the areas highlighted a level of performance is assigned to each component. 2. Post-Observation Conference Within five days of the classroom observation, the evaluator and educator meet to discuss the observation. The evaluator and educator discuss levels of performance assigned to each component and the related evidence. A final level of performance is determined collaboratively and assigned for each component. If the educator has not scored the observation, the conference can’t be held. A copy of the levels of performance assigned by the educator must be filed with observation documentation. 3. Submission of Artifacts Educators will submit artifacts to support Domain 1 and Domain 4. These domains address areas of teaching not seen through classroom observations. All educators being evaluated must submit an artifact declaration form in September. This form indicates the educator’s plan for submitting documents. Artifact evaluators will be available to meet with educators if needed prior to the artifact submission deadline. It is important that educators look closely at the rubrics when selecting artifacts for submission. The artifact checklist must be submitted with artifact submissions. This form indicates artifacts submitted for each component. An optional form is available to be used with any item submitted that may need additional clarification as to its application to a specific component. A clarifying statement may be written on the actual document rather than using the form. It is not required that anything other than the actual artifacts and the artifact checklist be submitted. Once artifact folders are submitted and scored, individual meetings will be held with each educator to review scores. At this time, educators may give clarifying information to support documents, but may not add additional documents. Educators may bank scores for three years on those components receiving a score of proficient or distinguished. Teachers new to the system may choose to opt out of this portion of the evaluation process their first year. 5. Evaluation Summary Conference Administrator and educator meet for end of year conference to review final evaluation ratings, close out current PLP, and create the PLP for the upcoming school year. 6. Professional Learning Plan (PLP) All educators will create a professional learning plan each year. This plan will be based on evaluation scores and a self-assessment. At the end of each school year, the educator and administrator will meet to review evaluation scores and choose one component as an area of focus for the upcoming school year. This component will be “Component 1” of the educator’s PLP. The educator will complete a self-assessment and choose one additional component of focus. This will be “Component 2” of the educators PLP. When creating a PLP, the educator must identify the Framework for Teaching components and the EDUCATEAlabama standards to which they align. The administrator and educator will collaboratively determine activities to be completed to address the areas identified for focus. Educators are required to complete a minimum of two hours of online PD (Educational Impact, Teachscape, SimpleK12) and one additional activity determined by the educator and administrator for each PLP component. The educator will have one year to complete the activities proposed on the PLP. If the activities proposed on the PLP are not completed in the allotted time period, they will be carried over to the next year’s PLP. New Educators New educators will create “Component 2” based on their self–assessment at the beginning of the school year and “Component 1” once the first classroom observation has been completed. PD/PLP Use Educational Impact to complete professional development for their PLP First Semester-“22 Components of Great Teaching” Second Semester-Two hours of video from “Danielson’s Teaching Framework: Looking at Great Classrooms” based on area of focus from first observation Scoring Procedures Domain ratings will be determined for each observation and for the documents submitted. Once all observations have been completed and documents scored, educators will be assigned an overall rating based on scores received from all components of the evaluation. Forms/Material All evaluations are to be completed online using Teachscape Reflect. Additional forms and material related to educator evaluation are available on the system’s website under the “Teacher Evaluation” tab.