Save the Doc with Your Name in It & Email it to:
mikeshackelford@rowlandhall.org
Cut a perfect card – including highlighting and emphasis.
http://blog.heritage.org/2013/07/25/whats-more-dangerous-a-sharknado-or-an-emp-attack/
Cut a quick politics card – identify every warrant why it won’t pass in the tag.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/congress-fiercely-divided-over-completely-blankbi,33256/?ref=auto
Cut the BEST card from this article.
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/ISEC_a_00127
Cut the conclusion of this artice.
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138818/shannon-k-oneil/mexico-makes-it
Tag this card.
Scuglia ’13 (E. Linda, Professor in the Department of Semiotics, University of Georgia, “The
Context of Stasis: The subcapitalist paradigm of consensus and socialist realism,”
http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/)
The characteristic theme of Buxton’s[5] critique of the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus is
the bridge between sexual identity and society. It could be said that Lyotard promotes the use
of socialist realism to attack sexism. A number of deconstructivisms concerning the subcapitalist
paradigm of consensus may be revealed. If one examines Debordist situation, one is faced with
a choice: either reject the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus or conclude that narrative is
created by the masses, but only if the premise of precultural theory is invalid. But Derrida
suggests the use of the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus to modify class. An abundance of
discourses concerning not narrative, but postnarrative exist. “Sexual identity is dead,” says
Foucault. In a sense, the masculine/feminine distinction which is a central theme of Stone’s
Heaven and Earth emerges again in Platoon. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist theory
that includes truth as a totality. But Debord uses the term ‘the subcapitalist paradigm of
consensus’ to denote the role of the observer as participant. If deconstructivist neocultural
theory holds, we have to choose between the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus and capitalist
capitalism. However, any number of desublimations concerning subsemiotic capitalist theory
may be discovered. Sontag uses the term ‘the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus’ to denote
the meaninglessness, and hence the economy, of postconceptual society. But von Junz[6] states
that we have to choose between capitalist theory and neodialectic rationalism. The main theme
of the works of Stone is not deconstruction, as the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus
suggests, but predeconstruction. Thus, Lyotard’s model of socialist realism suggests that sexual
identity, paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning. Bataille promotes the use of the subcapitalist
paradigm of consensus to challenge the status quo. Therefore, the characteristic theme of
McElwaine’s[7] analysis of socialist realism is the common ground between society and class.
The premise of capitalist theory states that reality must come from the collective unconscious,
given that reality is interchangeable with sexuality.