Australian Apprenticeship Support Network (Network Provider) Supervision webinar transcript Slide 1 Welcome to today’s webinar on the role of the Australian Apprenticeship Support Network Providers in relation to supervision. The aim of today is to equip you with knowledge and understanding of your role in regards to supervision and provide you with valuable tips. This webinar and associated material and links will be available to be used as a reference and/or training source. There will be opportunities to ask questions through the session. Today’s session will be recorded. Slide 2 Broadly speaking, the Network Provider assists parties to navigate the apprenticeship/traineeship system. In relation to supervision, the Network Provider specifically: provides “information” to the employer, so the employer understands their supervision obligations under the Further Education and Training Act 2014 and Section 3 of the Further Education and Training Regulation 2014 to enable the employer to make an informed decision about the supervision they must provide, and to select the most appropriate qualification for the outcome they, the employer, is looking for. Today we will be looking at what information the Network Provider provides to the employer. Slide 3 Making a determination the employer is meeting their obligations regarding the provision of adequate supervision, happens at various times over the life of an apprenticeship/traineeship. Specifically: at sign-up and permanent transfer – where the Network Provider conducts an induction identifying issues through the Network Provider’s monitoring role the department may identify through monitoring if a complaint is received if the Network Provider, the department or supervising registered training organisation (SRTO) becomes aware of a change of circumstance, e.g. change of business ownership, tradesperson resigns, temporary transfer which was negotiated as part of the Employer Resource Assessment (ERA) etc, and the SRTO determines supervision as part of developing the training plan and conducting the ERA, which is completed within three months of the start or at transfer of the apprenticeship/traineeship. Slide 4 To enable the employer to make an informed decision about the supervision, the employer must understand the meaning of ‘qualified’. The Declaration of apprenticeships and traineeships - Policy (table 16) provides the full definition of a qualified person for apprenticeships and traineeships. Today we will discuss two common questions. The first - What is documented evidence? Documented evidence is an official document giving information about a qualification and associated record of results or a statement of attainment as recognised under the Australian Qualifications Framework. This document is proof that the supervisor has achieved all the competencies to supervise the apprentice’s/trainee's training under the training plan. It does not matter if the qualification was achieved through RPL or training pathway. A supervisor MUST have documented evidence if supervising an apprentice. There is no exception. A question that may be asked is: Can a person supervise if they hold a higher qualification than the one being undertaken by the apprentice/trainee? Competencies in a higher qualification don’t always map across to a lower qualification. For example, if signing up apprentice in Certificate III Electrician – and the supervisor holds Certificate IV in Electrotechnology, these may not map across. The onus is on the employer to understand the requirements. The employer can refer to the training package to check, and if the employer remains uncertain, they can ask the registered training organisation for verification. Slide 5 The second question - How is demonstrated competence proved and what is required to provide the proof? Demonstrating competence is ONLY for traineeships. Proving competence can be done in a variety of ways, which does not necessarily involve having to undertake a recognition of prior learning process. For example, if the Network Provider was signing up a trainee in an office qualification at a mechanical workshop, and the owner of the business has been running the business, both mechanical and the completing of all the office functions by himself for a number of years, the owner could provide proof through his accountant, business records, or have a competency conversation with the Network Provider. As the onus is on the employer, the employer may refer to the training package; however, if unsure the employer may ask the Version 1 July 2015 – AASN supervision – webinar transcript 2 registered training organisation for verification. Slide 6 We have discussed and understand ‘qualified’. We can discuss the employer selecting an appropriate qualification. Queensland Training Information Service (QTIS) outlines a Job Summary, as well as listing other requirements, including supervision. QTIS is a valuable source of information for the employer to select the most appropriate qualification for the outcome they are looking for. At induction, it is important for the Network Provider to ensure the employer understand their obligations under the qualification because there are occasions when a third party has ‘marketed’ a particular qualification to the employer, which sometimes is not the outcome the employer is looking for. We will now discuss a specific case about selecting the most appropriate qualification. Slide 7 Case study For 17 years James has owned a landscaping business. James has no formal qualifications. James was marketed the Certificate III Parks and Gardens apprenticeship by a registered training organisation. James is seeking is to have his son undertake some formal training as this seems to be what ‘people are asking for nowadays’, in order to ‘take over’ the business. At sign-up it appears that James may not have been informed about the supervision requirements, because it is a father and son business and there is no other supervisor for the apprenticeship. James is not interested in going through an RPL process or assessment as he is getting ready to retire. Slide 8 Discussion and feedback provided by participants: 1. Can’t proceed as is as there is no supervisor and it is an apprenticeship. 2. Look at options and guide to a more appropriate training pathway. In this case: The training contract was registered, however, on review, once education on the apprenticeship system versus obtaining the qualification under Certificate 3 Guarantee was provided, both James and his son felt that the apprenticeship pathway was not the appropriate pathway and looked at a direct student pathway with a pre-qualified supplier. This training contract resulted in a cancellation. The Network Provider should flag these types of issues with the department. The department can address these types of issues with third parties who are marketing inappropriate Version 1 July 2015 – AASN supervision – webinar transcript 3 qualification through other channels. Slide 9 The difference in supervision between an apprenticeship and traineeship is that in: an apprenticeship the supervisor must have documented evidence, and in a traineeship the supervisor must prove competence. QTIS and the Declaration Policy provide an overview of the minimum requirements in regards to supervision and should always be checked. We will now discuss a traineeship and an apprenticeship. Slide 10 Case Study The Network Provider arrives at a sign-up for Certificate III in Telecommunications. The sign-up is for existing workers, some appear to be office staff. The Network Provider has some doubts about the appropriateness of the sign-up due to the work that may or may not be carried out by these workers, and is uncertain about who will be the supervisor and supervision in general. Slide 11 Discussion between participants exploring the questions the Network Provider may ask: What is the job role, job description and what duties do they perform on a day to day basis? Does the supervisor have the qualification? Are any telecommunications duties being undertaken? Why are they seeking this qualification, have they been marketed the incorrect qualification? Slide 12 To confirm the questions the Network Provider may ask: Need to ensure that the staff are engaged in the qualification they are signing up to and is relevant to their job. So need to ask what is there job to determine relevance to their job and workplace? Is there existence of appropriate range of work, and if not how will the trainee be trained in the gaps? Does the supervisor hold documented evidence, or are they able to demonstrate their competence in the relevant competencies they will be supervising? Is there an alternative pathway? Additionally, if the trainee is to be trained in the gaps identified, ask the question about how does the SRTO and employer plan to provide the training to gain the qualification, e.g, simulated, temporary transfer. Version 1 July 2015 – AASN supervision – webinar transcript 4 Slide 13 Case study of an apprenticeship: The Network Provider arrives at a sign-up for Certificate III in Carpentry. On arrival it appears by the business name the sign-up is for a company specialising in formwork. The sign-up is at a location that is a high rise. The Network Provider has some doubts about the range of work a carpenter may be exposed to on a high rise complex site. Discussion and feedback about the actions a Network Provider may take, or questions the Network Provider may ask: Ask about the range and scope of work. Determine relevance to workplace. Ask for supervisor qualifications. Cannot proceed if only undertaking formwork – different to carpentry. Slide 14 Apprenticeship specific actions/questions: Does the intending supervisor hold documented evidence as discussed earlier? Is the apprentice going to be undertaking the work of a carpenter – in a high rise? Are there appropriate tools that a carpenter would use? Check with the employer to see if the apprentice will be constructing wall and ceiling frames, pitching roofs, eaves, stairs, floors etc? Check Queensland Training Information Service for more information: o If not – you may ask how the employer plans to provide the range of work required to achieve the qualification. o If the employer is planning on expanding their business to add this type of work, you may need to determine timelines when likely to happen, as it might be better to wait until closer to that time to conduct a sign-up. In the end – if the qualification is not appropriate, provide the employer the options that will achieve the outcome they are looking for. Slide 15 When completing the training contract, a question relates to the number of supervisors to apprentice/trainees (the ratio). Answering this question is more than just writing in a number on the training contract. The Network Provider needs to be ‘satisfied’ the employer understands: 1. the definition of ‘qualified’ person 2. their responsibilities in providing enough adequate and appropriately qualified supervisors to supervise the apprentices and/or trainees for the qualification being undertaken Version 1 July 2015 – AASN supervision – webinar transcript 5 3. ensure they understand the difference between apprenticeships and traineeships 4. any specific qualification details 5. the qualification is appropriate for the workplace and is the outcome they are seeking. Employer must understand the supervisor: is designated to train the apprentice or trainee must be permanently engaged at the same workplace is predominantly employed during the same working hours as the apprentice or trainee. If the employer states he understands supervision requirements, the number the employer has provided is inserted. If the employer has provided false information, the department can take other actions against the employer. To summarise, as there is no documented ratio, at point of sign-up the Network Provider can consider a number of factors to determine if the arrangements look and feel right, including requesting additional information and seek advice from the department. Note: The SRTO does make the final determination on adequate supervision. Slide 16 Yes, the Network Provider should ensure the employer understands that between the prospective supervisors: they hold the necessary competencies to supervise the apprentice or trainee for the units of competency the apprentice or trainee is required to undertake a supervisor is available to supervise at the necessary times – e.g in a fabrication plant that operates 24 hours, and the apprentice is on day shift, the supervisor is also on the same shift. Slide 17 To answer this question, consider if an apprenticeship or traineeship. If an apprenticeship – YES If a traineeship – depends on the qualification. For example, if five trainees are working at different sites for one employer and they are undertaking Frontline Management; one supervisor is able to supervise each of the five trainees who are working across different sites. However, no one size fits all, each case must be determined individually. Slide 18 Are there any specific industry arrangements for supervision? Yes, approved supervision arrangements exist in the Specified Community Care and Specified Swimming Pool and Spa Industries, although not available for school-based trainees. Refer to procedure: Adequate Training Arrangements at www.ppr.det.qld.gov.au/training/apprentices/Pages/current-procedures.aspx Version 1 July 2015 – AASN supervision – webinar transcript 6 Additionally, the employer must understand specific supervision requirements for electrotechnology and other licensed trades. Slide 19 Can a sub-contractor be the supervisor? Yes. The sub-contractor must be engaged in the same workplace as the apprentice or trainee, only if the registered training organisation: documents the arrangement on the employer resource assessment agree to monitor the continuance of supervision by the sub-contractors agree to notify the department if the arrangement changes or ceases. Slide 20 Case Study about supervision and the RPL process - Can this sign-up occur? Certificate III in Civil Plant Operations – RII30809 (Apprenticeship) No qualified supervisors Intending supervisor/s is undertaking an RPL process. Discussion and feedback provided by participants: The employer must understand the difference between an apprenticeship and traineeship and what a qualified person is. If the employer is unable to provide suitable supervisors, then no sign-up should occur. The registered training organisation should be engaged to put ‘prospective supervisors’ through a recognition of prior learning process first, then once they are competent in the competencies they are required to supervise, then and only then, can the sign-up occur. Note: The intending supervisor only needs to hold the competencies for the competencies they will be supervising. Slide 21 Summary - The Network Provider can proceed with the registration of a training contract, if based on the information provided at sign-up/induction, the employer appears to be meeting the obligations of an employer of apprentices under the Further Education and Training (FET) Act 2014; and if all other requirements are met. The department has given the Network Provider the delegation to register or refuse to register the registration. If the Network Provider has any concerns about appropriateness of the qualification being undertaken, or the supervision arrangements, the Network Provider may: 1. seek additional information in writing as per the FET Act 2. rather than wait for the SRTO to undertake the employer resource assessment (ERA) contact the department to seek guidance and assistance with the sign-up. Version 1 July 2015 – AASN supervision – webinar transcript 7 It is beneficial to capture issues early, preferably at sign-up as signing of the contract is not always driven by the employer and the employer may not completely understand what their obligations are when they sign the training contract. When the SRTO accepts their role, they are accepting to undertake completing the ERA and developing the training plan. This occurs within three months of the start of the apprenticeship or traineeship. The SRTO will assess the employer’s capacity to provide the supervision. If the SRTO identifies issues with the employer’s capacity to fulfil its obligations, the SRTO is obligated to notify the department and cancellation of the training contract may be an outcome. Depending on the situation, there are consequences if a training contract is cancelled for false or misleading, which may include: • • • restrictions on registration and/or funds recovery from either the employer and/or Network Provider loss of pre-qualified supplier status and funds recovered and possible referral to Australian Skills Quality Authority for the SRTO imposing disciplinary actions such as a reprimand, fine, and/or declaring prohibited status for an employer. Slide 22 Need more help? Contact OPRA@dete.qld.gov.au for any assistance or to provide feedback. Version 1 July 2015 – AASN supervision – webinar transcript 8