Agenda Item 3.2 Appendix 2 EAST AYRSHIRE CHILD PROTECTION COMMITTEE SELF EVALUATION PLAN 2011-2013 The East Ayrshire Child Protection Committee (EACPC) is committed to ongoing self-evaluation, and has promoted the use of the quality indicators as a framework for evaluating practice since they were published by HMIe in 2005. The Committee has adopted a rigorous approach to self-evaluation, with reflection, learning and improvement being central to this activity. Our approach is that self evaluation is a targeted, proportionate and integrated program that leads to improvement. We recognise that self-evaluation is an evolving process which takes place at all levels – at a strategic level, at a management level and at an operational level. For this reason, we have a multi method approach to self-evaluation; with a strong focus on change, process and service outcomes, all of which contribute to improved outcomes for children. The performance and quality subgroup leads on this work for EACPC. Our approach consists of these distinct elements: Multi Agency Self Evaluation Activity in respect of Specific Areas of Focus Multi agency self-evaluation activity takes place on a continuous basis in respect of specific areas of focus. These reflect the priorities for the Committee as they are focused on our improvement activity. Multi Agency Self Evaluation using Quality Indicators Multi agency self-evaluation also takes place across the range of quality indicators, but with a specific focus on the quality indicators where a need for improvement has been identified, either through external scrutiny or through organisational learning at local level. Single Agency Self Evaluation using Quality Indicators Single agency self-evaluation continues to ensure that individual agencies are aware of the quality of their own practices and how this impacts and enhances partnership working. This will continue to be central to our self-evaluation approach, with each agency evaluating in a proportionate way, recognising existing strengths and needs. A key element of self assessment is the need for evidence. EACPC continues to be committed to demonstrating improvement and development, with clear evidence which: confirms that the improvement is delivering results; confirms that the results are contributing to/achieving improved outcomes for children and young people. EACPC Self Evaluation Plan 2011-2013 Thematic considerations pre birth Long term neglect- HMIe inspection report 2010 Problematic drug use Wellbeing Indicator Safe Healthy Included Desired/Expected Outcome Area for Improvement Linked QI What are we going to do? Lead Target Date Source Children and young people get the right help they need at the right time. Involvement of health staff in early stages of planning the response to CP concerns- need to monitor the consistent use of the ‘Tripartite’ process 2.3 Management action in SW to monitor the use and recording of the process. Tripartite to be recorded explicitly in CP1 Martin Egan June 2012 HMIe inspection report 2010 Arrangements in place for medical examination for children during child protection process 5.3 Views of children and young people in the child protection process 2.1 Children and young people feel involved in decisions being 5.2 5.3 Further file audit –to build on information from previous audit to map progress in the involvement of health at point of initial referral. 5.1 Evaluation medical examination process. Establish a short life working group to consider How do we seek the views of children in East Ayrshire November 2012 DB DB (MB) April 2012 (attached report March 2012) December 2012 EACPC Plan 2011-2015 File audit February/March 2011 HMIe inspection report 2010 EACPC Plan 2011-2015 Respected made about them and why. Children’s plans evidence clear outcomes and contingency planning arrangements where appropriate Ensure children’s plans 5.4 are SMART, clearly detailing the outcomes 2.4 for the child Children’s plans reflect the involvement of children of ALL ages in the assessment, planning and evaluation. Safe Increasing practitioners competence and confidence in improving outcomes for children 2.1 5.1 What tools do we use How effective – impact on outcomes for children File audit activity to sample children’s plan to ensure that they are SMART and outcome focused Joyce C File audit activity to sample children’s plan to ensure that they reflect the involvement of the child HMIe inspection report2010, Outcome Framework Action Plan, File audit February/March 2011 December 2012 Chronologies should be 5.2 completed for each child in a consistent manner and detailing the source of the information Further file audit –to build on information from previous audit to map progress in the quality and consistency of chronologies in children’s files Dianne Burns May 2012 To develop clearer links between learning and development and practice Review process of evaluating the impact of learning and development on practice. Learnin g and develop ment sub group March 2013 File audit February/March 2011 Medical Examinations EAST AYRSHIRE CHILD PROTECTION COMMITTEE (Appendix to Self Evaluation Plan 2011-13 for CPC meeting 6th March 2012) Child Protection Medical Examinations for ALL presenting circumstances Decision to undertake an examination The decision whether or not to undertake an examination is a joint decision taken by involved professionals from police, social work and health with the final agreement being made involving the Designated Paediatrician for Child Protection or a Consultant Paediatrician. Timing The timing of the examination is agreed by the medical examiner(s) and communicated to the social worker with lead responsibility for the investigation. In deciding the timing the following are considered in the order listed: What is in the best interest of the child? When is the optimum time for gathering of forensic evidence? Facility for the examination Joint paediatric forensic examinations take place in one of the appropriately equipped paediatric health facilities: Ward 1A – the Paediatric Assessment Suite Crosshouse Hospital Rainbow House – Paediatric Community Assessment Unit, Ayrshire Central Hospital Both these facilities have the necessary equipment including a colposcope: Video-colposcopy facilities are available at Crosshouse Hospital and still photographic imaging facilities are available at Rainbow House. Other, single doctor, examinations can take place in a health environment which is child friendly and causes least disruption to the child such as the Paediatric suite of the A&E department or the Paediatric In-patient or assessment ward. Consent It is the examining doctor’s responsibility to obtain informed consent including specific consent to record findings by photographs or video/DVD and the provision of a report for the police and social work services. The principles of the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 should be applied when gaining consent, thus consent may be given by: The child A parent who are parental rights and responsibilities in accordance with section 3 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. Support for the child Support for the child is available throughout the examination. The child’s wishes are considered when identifying support. Medical Staff Medical staff available to undertake child protection examinations are as follows: Consultant Paediatrician- Lead Responsibility for Child Protection Designated Paediatrician for Child Protection Consultant Paediatricians (General) – Eight in total in Ayrshire Child Medical Examiners (CME) Forensic Examinations Forensic examinations for ALL cases of child sexual abuse and for other examinations where the child cannot corroborate the cause of the injury are undertaken by two doctors, as detailed below: Consultant Paediatrician- Lead Responsibility for Child Protection Designated Paediatrician and a CME The on-call Consultant Paediatrician and a CME Roles & Responsibilities of Paediatric Medical Staff (Designated and Lead Consultant Paediatrician for Child Protection and Consultant Paediatrician) Within normal working hours the Designated and Lead Consultant Paediatrician for Child Protection who have specialist skills in Child Sexual Abuse examinations are the first choice to undertake forensic examinations. The role and responsibility of the Designated and Lead Consultant Paediatrician is to: Undertake the Paediatric examination of the child’s health and development Assist in interpreting and corroborate the forensic findings Corroborate the examination process Outwith normal working hours or when the Designated and Lead Consultant Paediatrician are unavailable the on-call Consultant Paediatrician participates in the examination. The role and responsibility of the Consultant Paediatrician is to: Undertake the Paediatric examination of the child’s health and development Corroborate the examination process Child sexual abuse - Corroborate the examination findings but NOT the interpretation of these All other forensic examinations - Assist in interpreting and corroborate the forensic findings Corroboration of the examination process can be defined as: Confirming the identity of the CME Confirming the date, time and venue of the examination and the identity of the child Confirming the process for gathering the forensic samples by the CME The Police have one CME on a 24/7 rota, this CME Rota covers the West of Scotland and standard practice is for the CME to contact the On call Paediatrician to participate in the Forensic Child abuse medical examination, as described above In situations of acute sexual assault in young people 13 years and over NHS A&A has a service level agreement with Archway (Glasgow) where young people will be examined. Non-Forensic Examinations (Comprehensive Medical Examinations) These examinations may be undertaken by a single doctor. Medical staff available to undertake Comprehensive Medical Examinations are as follows: The Designated Paediatrician for Child Protection – available Monday-Friday 9am – 5pm or The On-call Consultant Paediatrician (available 24/7) Supporting Evidence: Examination facilities available to view Minutes of meetings of the MCN and Regional Planning Group for Children’s Services Proposal for tertiary service Notes from the stakeholder event Practice Guideline