Track B Review : PCN Polychlorinated Naphtalenes (PCNs) Track B review for the UNECE LRTAP Task Force on Persistent Organic Pollutants May 2006 Reviewers: Erik Gravenfors Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate (KEMI), Sweden Sergey Kakareka National Academy of Sciences, Belarus André Peetersweem Information Centre for the Environment, Netherlands Track B Review : PCN SUMMARY Until the 1970s PCNs were high volume chemicals. The most important uses, in terms of volume, have been in cable insulation, wood preservation, engine oil additives, electroplating masking compounds, feedstocks for dye productions, dye carriers, capacitors and in refracting index oils. Besides these uses PCNs are also present in technical PCB formulations and can also be formed in thermal processes, of which waste incineration is the most important. The dossier gives a good overview of the way the production and use of PCNs has evolved over the last century and has stopped. There are however indications on unknown or illegal production and use that need to be elaborated further. The information on PCN emissions is satisfactory for Europe but data on the PCN emissions from North America need to be explored. The latest findings from air and snow samples that indicates ongoing sources of technical PCNs need to be further examined. The information regarded socio-economic factors is extremely limited. However, the need to explore this information any further is probably not urgent due to the fact that there is no demand for PCNs anymore. Introduction Polychlorinated Naphtalenes (PCNs) was nominated by The European Commission in September 2005 for inclusion into the POP Protocol. To support the nomination a report prepared by the Netherlands in 2002 was sent in at the same time. Later on in December 2005 an addendum to the original report was sent in and in January 2006 another document was sent in with responses to recieved comments on the reports of the PCNs. In conclusion the dossier for PCN now consist of the following three documents: Van de Plassche EJ, AMGR Schwegler. 2002. Polychlorinated Naphthalenes. Dossier prepared for the third meeting of the UN-ECE Ad hoc Expert Group on POPs. Royal Haskoning report L0002.A0/R0010/EVDP/TL; Belfroid A., E. van der Aa and F. Balk. 2005. Addendum to the risk profile of Polychlorinated Naphthalenes. Royal Haskoning report 9R5744.01/R0006/ABE/CKV/Nijm; Belfroid A, Blok H, van der Aa E and Balk F. 2006. Response to the comments on the dossier of the POP-candidate PCNs. Royal Haskoning. This review is part of the Track B reviews for the TFPOP in 2006 and will focus only on the parts of the dossier concerning extent of the release to the environment and socio economic factors. Track B Review : PCN Release to the Environment The references in the dossier concerning production, use and emissions are generally complete. Production and Use Until the 1970s PCNs were high volume chemicals. The global production was estimated to be approximately 150,000 metric tonnes between 1920 and 1980. The most important uses, in terms of volume, have been in: cable insulation wood preservation engine oil additives electroplating masking compounds feedstocks for dye productions dye carriers capacitors refracting index oils Besides these uses PCNs are also present in technical PCB formulations and can also be formed in thermal processes, of which waste incineration is the most important (see emissions). The dossier gives a good overview of the way the production and use of PCNs has evolved over the last century and has stopped. Because the production has stopped there is a lack of data on some aspects but for the same reason there is no need for additional data. However, this overall picture may not be totally correct. There are indications that PCNs are produced up to now and additional information in the addendum to the risk profile indicates possible ongoing illegal sale and use of PCNs. Further investigations on the scale of these unknown but indicated production and uses of PCNs will be needed in order to evaluate the overall impact from these possible emission sources. Emissions Since the main production and use of PCNs belongs to the past the remaining sources will be historical use of PCNs, historical and present use of PCBs, thermal process such as Municipal Waste Incineration and emissions from landfills. In the addendum to the risk profile an annual emission of PCNs in UNECE-Europe for the year 2000 was calculated to be 1.03 tonnes per year divided on the following emission source categories: Public power and heat: Residential combustion Industrial combustion and processes Solvent and product use Waste incineration 1% 10 % 11 % 6% 74 % The same information for North America would be informative. In the addendum to the risk profile there is a study on PCNs in air and snow which indicates ongoing sources of technical PCN based on the congener fingerprint. The highest levels were detected in urban/industrialized areas of Poland, London and Moscow. It is unclear if the calculated emissions for the year 2000 includes these emissions. The dossier gives ample information on the emission of PCNs that is linked to the use of PCBs. A Track B Review : PCN total world wide production is estimated of 169 ton as a by-product of the production of PCBs. It is unclear for which year this estimation was made. If possible information about the year for which the production estimates were made would be helpful. Incineration of waste is an important source of remaining emissions of PCNs. Many results are given of emission measurements at waste incinerators. It is unclear whether these data concern the raw gases from the incinerators or the clean gases. Are these data measured before emission abatement installations or after? And if these data are measured in the clean gases, what types of abatement techniques are used? Are these data measured at installations that are equipped with only a dust removal system, or are these data measured at installations that are based on the use of the Best Available Techniques as described in the EU BAT reference document for waste incineration? This need to be sorted out. The emissions from possible remaining production and usage of PCNs are not estimated. The environmental levels in air measured at 71 locations in 22 countries across the Euoropean continent indicates that there are also emissions from technical mixtures of PCNs. There is a need for additional data on this issue. Socio-Economic Factors The information in this section is extremely limited. The main reason for this lack of information is that PCNs are not hardly in use anymore. Alternatives/Substitutes The only available information here is that since the production of PCNs has been stopped as early as in the seventies and eighties, PCNs must have been substituted by other chemicals. These chemicals have not been identified and further discribed in the dossier. Emission Control Techniques The use of PCBs and waste incineration are assumed to be the most important remaining sources of emissions of PCNs. The emissions of PCNs from these sources are reduced by the same measures that are already taken to reduce the emission of PCBs from the use of PCBs and to reduce emissions of PCBs and dioxins from incineration. Cost and Benefits of Control No information is available on cost and benefits of control.