Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 CHAPTER 10 VALUING THE SITE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES This chapter outlines the three methods used to appraise land, and reviews the important site factors covered in Chapter 6. Topics to be covered include: 10.1 10.2 10.3 Reasons for Appraisals of Land The Five Methods Used to Appraise Land How to Use Market Comparison Techniques Class Activities [Instructor: Complete as needed.] Lecture [ ] Discussion [ ] Breakout Groups [ ] Other ____________[ ] 10.1 PURPOSE OF LAND OR SITE VALUE ESTIMATES This section outlines the several purposes of site value appraisals. Reasons for Appraisals of Land Appraisals of vacant land are made for many market-related, legal, and public purposes, including the following: Sale and purchase Development Feasibility studies Land leases Financing (Acquisition and Construction) Government actions Agriculture Court actions Allocation of Value for Tax Purposes Ad Valorem (or “according to value”) property tax assessments are usually imposed on land and improvements as two separate amounts. Income tax laws require that the purchase price of real property be allocated between the land and improvement values, when depreciation is to be claimed. Site Value in the Three Value Approaches Site or land value estimates are used in all three approaches to value. The cost approach requires an estimate of the site value. Certain techniques in the income approach rely on a separate site value. The sales comparison approach may need an allocated site value to use some analysis techniques. 10-1 Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 10.2 THE FIVE METHODS USED TO APPRAISE LAND This section reviews the importance of highest and best use, and covers the five recognized methods of appraising land. Importance of Highest and Best Use The highest and best use is defined as that reasonable and profitable use that will support the highest land value as of the date of the appraisal. An opinion of highest and best use is required by USPAP in all market value appraisals. The highest and best use provides the basis for land valuation and for selecting comparable sales. Highest and Best Use Criteria To qualify as the highest and best use, any suggested use must meet the following tests: 1. Physically possible 2. Legally permissible 3. 4. Economically feasible Most (or maximally) productive While the sequence of applying the foregoing tests is not dictated, but Physically possible and Legally permissible must be addressed before considering the latter two tests. Appraising Land Using the Market Method The market, or direct sales comparison, method is preferred above the other methods of appraising land. Like the sales comparison approach used to appraise improved properties, the market method relies on comparable sales. The Basis and Criteria of Comparison 1. The property is always compared as if it were vacant land, available for its highest and best use. 2. All comparables should be sales of vacant land, close in time to the date of value, comparable as to: Location Physical characteristics Zoning and/or potential use Applying the Market Method 1. The market method may be used to appraise all kinds of land: 2. When sales of comparable vacant sites or land parcels are available. When land value is being estimated, or to allocate the land value of an improved property. Apply the following steps, using the same standards required in the sales comparison approach: a. b. Locate vacant land sales comparable to the subject. Compare each sale with the subject property. 10-2 Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 c. d. Adjust the selling prices as required for differences with the subject property. Arrive at an indicated value. [Instructor: Comparison and adjustment techniques are explored in Section 10.3.] The Allocation and Abstraction Methods 1. The allocation and abstraction methods are typically used: 2. In site appraisals where no vacant land sales are available. When shared land interests are being appraised, for example, condominiums and planned unit developments. How to use the allocation method: a. b. Locate sales of improved properties that are comparable to the subject property as to highest and best use, and other site features, and that sold close in time to the date of value. Allocate the total sales price between land and buildings, relying upon one of the following: 1) 2) 3. A market-observed value relationship – percentage or ratio The property tax assessment ratio Examples of the allocation and abstraction methods, with the optional techniques cited: a. Allocation Method – Based upon a market-observed value relationship or ratio: Assume a $450,000 sale of an improved property, where past research has shown a 35% site value: The site value allocation is: $450,000 × .35 = $157,500 b. Abstraction Method: Assume an improved property sales price of: Less: depreciated cost of the improvements The abstracted land value equals: c. $340,000 –156,000 $184,000 The property tax assessment ratio: Assume a sales price of $300,000 for a property locally assessed at $260,000: $60,000 land, and $200,000 improvements: The ratio equals $60,000 ÷ $260,000 = 0.231, or 23.1% land value. Land value allocation = $300,000 x 23.1% = $69,300. 4. Limitations of the allocation and abstraction methods: Land value ratios vary with location and type of property. The basis of assessment roll ratios may be outdated and/or unreliable. Abstracted site values have limited reliability. 10-3 Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 The Development Method The development method requires: (1) a study of subdivided lot sales, and (2) a detailed development cost estimate for the subject land parcel. The development method is preferred: To appraise raw acreage that is ready for subdivision. Where no comparable sales of similar acreage are available. The steps in the development method are as follows: 1. Estimate the number of lots to be developed. 2. Project the total dollar amount to be realized from gross sales, based on market study of current prices for subdivision lots. 3. Subtract or otherwise account for all direct and indirect costs of development, promotion, and sales. Developer’s profit may be treated in a number of ways, including: 4. As a percentage of gross sales, or As a percentage of capital invested in raw land. Conclude the value of the raw land by an analysis of the results. [Instructor: The development method is illustrated in Example 10.1 of the text.] The Land Residual Method The land residual method calculates land value as a function of its contribution to the total income. It is: Based on the principle of surplus productivity. A version of the income approach. Useful when no comparable sales are available. Suitable for either vacant or improved properties; particularly newer income-producing properties. This method will be covered in Chapter 14 in more detail. 10.3 HOW TO USE MARKET COMPARISON TECHNIQUES The market comparison method of land appraisal relies on the same principles defined in Chapters 8 and 9. Techniques that are unique to site appraisals will be emphasized in this section. Types and Sources of Data Criteria for Comparable Sales All sales must be competitive with the subject property and each other. They must be open market transactions. They should be relatively close in time to the date of the appraisal. 10-4 Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 Current or Prior Sale of Subject Property Any known agreement of sale, option, or listing of the subject property around the time of the date of value should be considered and analyzed by the appraiser and discussed in any report. Prior sales of the subject property should be investigated and analyzed if they have occurred within three years of the date of value. If relevant, the appraiser must indicate how this analysis influences the value of the subject property. What Data to Include Physical data should include lot size, shape, frontage, slope, topography, etc. Legal data should include the address, legal description, zoning, taxes, special assessments, and public and private restrictions. Details should include names of grantee (buyer) and grantor (seller), date, price, and terms of sale. Sales History of Comparables A sales history of any comparable sales located in a speculative area should be included. Some clients may require a sales history of all comparable properties sold during the year prior to the most current sale (at a minimum). Each prior sale of a comparable should be analyzed by the appraiser as to its relevance to the appraisal. Sources of Data Public records include: Recorded deeds, demolition and construction permits, subdivision map applications Property tax and assessment records Other sources of land sales data: Buyers and sellers Brokers Land developers Realty board listings (MLS) Title companies Lenders Newspaper advertisements Market data services Appraisers’ files Verification of the Data The price and terms of the sale should be verified with a principal party; favorable interest rates and terms are common in land sales. Data from public records does not always indicate the full purchase price. For example, transfer tax amounts shown on recorded deeds may reflect only the cash consideration. Outstanding balances of assumed loans may not be included. 10-5 Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 Major Land Features Affecting Value The land features affecting value, discussed in Chapter 6, are listed here. Physical Features Size Shape Frontage Width Depth Plottage Type of lot Topography Other attributes Legal and Locational Features Legal form of ownership (airspace condominiums, detached lot, etc.) Zoning: use and density regulations; legal nonconforming use Environmental protection laws Easements, right-of-way regulations, deed restrictions, and private encumbrances Negative locational factors, e.g., earthquake, flood, and waste hazards Utilities and other municipal or public services The level of property taxes Analyzing the Sales Data Land sales must be analyzed and compared, as in the sales comparison approach with improved properties. Elements of Comparison The four elements of comparison are: 1. 2. Terms/conditions of sale Time of sale 3. 4. Location Physical characteristics Vacant land sales are often financed by the seller. Lower interest rates and subordination clauses are common. (The latter is an agreement by the seller to subordinate the loan, usually to a future construction or development loan.) Units of Comparison for Land Appraisals Residential lots are often sold and compared by selling price per lot, square foot, or acre. Lots zoned for multiple-residential or condominium projects may sell at the price per dwelling unit that can be developed. Commercial or industrial land is usually sold by the selling price per square foot, but larger parcels are sold by the acre. Office and mixed-use properties are often sold on a price per buildable square foot basis. High-valued commercial property may be sold on a front foot basis. Several analyses may be needed to discover the best unit of comparison (see Example 10-2). 10-6 Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 The Adjustments Land prices are adjusted with either lump-sum or percentage amounts. You can review these adjustment methods in Chapter 9. A sales adjustment grid is recommended. (See Text Example 10.3, below.) Give the greatest weight to the sales requiring the least total absolute or gross adjustment (that is, without considering plus or minus signs). SUMMARY [Instructor: Refer back to the beginning of your outline, or review the following terms and concepts to summarize this session.] Important Terms and Concepts Abstraction method Allocation method Developer’s profit Development method Elements of comparison Highest and best use criteria Interim use value Land residual method Market method Plottage value REVIEWING YOUR UNDERSTANDING [Instructor: See end of text chapter for student review questions.] 10-7 Sales history Site characteristics Units of comparison Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition Chapter 10 STUDENT EXERCISES [Instructor: Suggested Multiple Choice and True/False questions are available to use for Chapter 10.] 10-8