Stored Polarized Atomic Hydrogen for Møller Polarimetry V.G. Luppov University of Michigan Spin Physics Center December 7, 2002 OUTLINE 1. Electron – spin – polarized atomic hydrogen stabilization 1.1 Principle 1.2 Michigan prototype apparatus 2. Target Thickness 2.1 Magnetic compression 2.2 Confinement time 2.3 Atomic hydrogen decay 2.4 Achievable density and thickness 2.5 Atomic hydrogen density monitoring 3. Target electron spin polarization 3.1 Polarization of incoming atomic hydrogen 3.2 Atoms with “wrong” spin admixture 3.3 Polarization “self-cleaning” mechanism 3.4 Depolarization processes 3.5 Polarization reversal 4. Residual gas backgrounds 4.1 Helium background 4.2 Accelerator residual gas background 5. Conclusions 1 Schematic Hyperfine Energy Level Diagram of Hydrogen Atom in Magnetic Field 17 mK E(K) 1 2 + Electron spin “up” (Low Field Seekers-LFS) 10.8K at 8T 68 mK B(T) Electron spin “down” 3 (High Field Seekers-HFS) 51 mK 51 mK - electron spin, - proton spin For instance, for a magnetic field of 8 T and the atomic hydrogen temperature of 300 mK, the ratio of electron spins - down to spinsup is exp(2BB/kT)= 3.61015. In order to stabilize atomic hydrogen several essential requirements have to be met: - atoms must be made (by dissociating H2 ); - the electron spins must be polarized, so that atoms interact via the 3u+ potential; - the spin polarization must be maintained; - the atomic hydrogen must be confined to a cell and the surface recombination must be suppressed. 2 Potential Energy of Low Field Seekers ( 1> and 2> ) and High Field Seekers ( 3> and 4> ) Along the Solenoid Axis. Storage Cell Displayed Relative to the Solenoid Field Profile 3 Schematic Diagram of the Michigan Prototype Jet Target 20 cm __________ 4 The probability that the electron spin-up atoms enter the Stabilization Cell p = e-B/kT Probability where - Bohr magneton (9.2710-24 J/T); B - magnetic field; K - Boltzmann constant (1.3810-23 J/K) T - temperature (T 300 mK) 1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E-02 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 1.00E-06 1.00E-07 1.00E-08 1.00E-09 1.00E-10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Magnetic Field (T) 5 7 8 9 10 Magnetic Compression Axial stored polarized atomic hydrogen density distribution: n(z) = n(B0)exp[-(B0-Bz(z))/kT] Density Distribution in Magnetic Field 1.00E+00 Density (arb.units) 1.00E-01 1.00E-02 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 1.00E-06 1.00E-07 1.00E-08 8 6 4 Magnetic Field (T) 6 2 0 The axial longitudinal solenoid magnetic field decay can be approximated by Bz(z) = B0(1-z2/z02) (z0=14 cm): Magnetic Field (T) Solenoid Field Profile 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Distance from Solenoid Center (cm) Stored Atomic Hydrogen Density Profile Density (arb. units) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Distance from Solenoid Center (cm) 7 16 18 Confinement Time dn/dt = – n/es, where es = esoeB/kT eso = 4Veff/KvavA (~ 50 ms) Veff - cell volume (for diameter D=4 cm, effective length L=19 cm, Veff=239 cm3) K - Clausing flow conductance fact (Our cell K=(15(L/D)+12(L/D)2)/(20+38(L/D)+12(L/D)2); K=19) vav - average atomic velocity (for T=300 mk vav=(2/√π)√2kT/m=80 m/sec) A – cell cross section (12.6 cm2). Confinement Time (sec) Confinement Time 1.00E+09 1.00E+07 1.00E+05 1.00E+03 1.00E+01 1.00E-01 0 2 4 6 8 Magnetic Field (T) For 8 Tesla magnetic field es = 3x106 sec: an ideal trap 8 10 Atomic Hydrogen Decay Rate equations for hyperfine3 and 4 states in case: - there are no1 and 2 states; - low density (< 1017 H/cm3) to ignore volume recombination {H + H +H H2 + H} dn4/dt = 4/Veff - 2 K44 n42 – K43 n4 n3 – G43 (n4 + n3)( n4 – n3) - n4/es , dn3/dt = 3/Veff – K43 n4 n3 + G43 (n4 + n3)( n4 – n3) – n3/es , where ni - atomic hydrogen i state density i - atomic hydrogen i state feed rate, Veff - effective volume, Kij - two-body recombination rate constants (occurring principally on the surface), {H + H +He H2 + He} G43 - two-body magnetic dipole-dipole nuclear relaxation rate constant, {3 4 } es - escaping time from the magnetic trap, ________________________________________________________________________ If n3 + n4 n and n3 = n4 = n/2, then: dn4/dt = 4/Veff - 2 K44 n42 – K43 n4 n3 – G43 (n4 + n3)( n4 – n3) - n4/es , + dn3/dt = 3/Veff – K43 n4 n3 + G43 (n4 + n3)( n4 – n3) – n3/es _____________________________________________________________ dn/dt = /Veff - Kseff n2 – n/es where = 3 + 4 - atomic hydrogen feed rate Kseff =1/2 (K43 + K44) 9 Two-Body Recombination Rate Constants K43 =2.510-8 (A/V) 2 exp(2b/kT) T1/2 B-2 K44 = 3 K43 Kseff =1/2 (K43 + K44) = 510-8 (A/V) 2 exp(2a/kT) T1/2 B-2 where A - storage cell surface area, V - storage cell effective volume, - thermal deBroglie wavelength (=(h2/2kTM)1/2=1.7410-7 T-1/2) a - H adsorption energy on He surface (a 1 K) 10 Density (atoms/cm3) Stored Atomic Hydrogen Density vs Magnetic Field for Different H Feed Rates (T=0.3 K) 1x10^15 atoms/sec 5x10^15 atoms/sec 1x10^16 atoms/sec 1.00E+17 1.00E+16 1.00E+15 1.00E+14 1.00E+13 1.00E+12 1.00E+11 1.00E+10 0 2 4 6 8 10 Solenoid Magnetic Field (T) Thickness (atoms/cm2) Stored Atomic Hydrogen Thickness vs Magnetic Field for Different H Feed Rates (T=0.3 K) 1.00E+18 1.00E+17 1.00E+16 1.00E+15 1.00E+14 1.00E+13 1.00E+12 1.00E+11 1.00E+10 1x10^15 atoms/sec 5x10^15 atoms/sec 1x10^16 atoms/sec 0 2 4 6 8 10 Solenoid Magnetic Field (T) 11 Stored Atomic Hydrogen Density vs Temperature (B =8 T) 3 Density (atoms/cm ) 1.00E+17 1.00E+16 1x10^15 atoms/sec 1.00E+15 5x10^15 atoms/sec 1x10^16 atoms/sec 1.00E+14 M.Mertig et al, Rev.Sc.In. 62 (1), 1991 1.00E+13 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Temperature (K) 12 0.5 Atomic Hydrogen Density Monitoring Either a capacitive pressure gauge (Matthey, A.P.M., Walraven, J.T.M., and Silvera, I.F., Phys. Rev.Lett. 46, 668 (1981), or a bolometer monitor (Mertig, M., Luppov, V.G., Roser, T., and Vuaridel B., Rev.Sci. Instrum., 62(1), 251 (1991)) could be used for continues atomic hydrogen density measurements. 13 Target Electron-Spin- Polarization 1 17 mK E(K) 2 + Electron spin “up” (Low Field Seekers-LFS) 10.8K at 8 T 68 mK B(T) Electron spin “down” 3 (High Field Seekers-HFS) 51 - electron spin, 51 mK mK - proton spin = tan , where = 1/2arctan(a/[h(e + p )B] a = 9.4210-25 [J] - hyperfine coupling constant, e = 2.801010 [T-1s-1] – electron gyromagnetic ratio, p = 4.26107 [T-1s-1] – proton gyromagnetic ratio. For the mixed state 4> a fraction of atoms with “wrong” electron–spin–up direction is tan2 . 14 Target Electron-Spin- Polarization Fraction of Electron Spinup Electron Spin-up Fraction vs. Magnetic Field 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 1.00E-06 0 2 4 6 8 10 Magnetic Field (T) Density (arb.units) Density Distribution in Magnetic Field 1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E-02 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 1.00E-06 1.00E-07 1.00E-08 8 6 4 Magnetic Field (T) 15 2 0 Polarization “Self-Cleaning” Mechanism eso = 4Veff/KvavA (~ 50 ms) Veff - cell volume (for diameter D=4 cm, effective length L=19 cm, Veff=239 cm3) K - Clausing flow conductance fact (Our cell K=(15(L/D)+12(L/D)2)/(20+38(L/D)+12(L/D)2); K=19) vav - average atomic velocity (for T=300 mk vav=(2/√π)√2kT/m=80 m/sec) A – cell cross section (12.6 cm2). 16 Depolarization Processes dn2/dt =ξK333n33 + G32n32– n2/es0, where ξ = 0.91 – a fraction of {3 + 3 + 3 H2 + 2} (1- ξ) → {3 + 3 + 3 H2 + 3} K333 - three-body recombination rate constant (K333≈9·10-39 cm6/sec), G32 – electronic relaxation rate constant (G32 = 1.1·10-15exp(-1.35B/T) cm3/sec) es0 = 0.05 sec 3 Density (atoms/cm ) Stored Electron-Spin-Up ([2>) Atomic Hydrogen Density vs Magnetic Field for Different H Feed Rates (T=0.3 K) 1x10^15 ato ms/sec 5x10^15 ato ms/sec 1x10^16 ato ms/sec 1.00E+11 1.00E+10 1.00E+09 1.00E+08 1.00E+07 1.00E+06 0 2 4 6 8 Magnetic Field (T) 17 10 3 Density (atoms/cm ) Stored Electron-Spin-Up ([2>) Atomic Hydrogen Density vs Magnetic Field for Different H Feed Rates (T=0.3 K) 1x10^15 ato ms/sec 5x10^15 ato ms/sec 1x10^16 ato ms/sec 1.00E+11 1.00E+10 1.00E+09 1.00E+08 1.00E+07 1.00E+06 0 2 4 6 8 10 Magnetic Field (T) 3 Density (atoms/cm ) Stored Atomic Hydrogen Density vs Magnetic Field for Different H Feed Rates (T=0.3 K) 1x10^15 atoms/sec 5x10^15 atoms/sec 1x10^16 atoms/sec 1.00E+17 1.00E+16 1.00E+15 1.00E+14 1.00E+13 1.00E+12 1.00E+11 1.00E+10 0 2 4 6 8 Magnetic Field (T) 18 10 Polarization Reversal ● To reverse the stored atomic hydrogen longitudinal polarization the magnetic field orientation has to be changed. ● For this purpose, the solenoid magnetic field should be first turned off, and then turned back on with the opposite polarity. ● Then the storage cell should be refilled with atomic hydrogen. ● The total procedure should not take longer than 1.5 hours. Schematic Diagram of the Michigan Prototype Jet Target 19 Residual Gas Backgrounds ● Helium Background Pressure (Torr) Vapor Pressure of Liquid He4 1.60E-05 1.00E-04 1.00E-08 1.00E-12 1.00E-16 1.00E-20 1.00E-24 1.00E-28 1.00E-32 2.80E-04 2.70E-07 3.40E-10 8.10E-16 4.20E-32 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Temperature (K) ● The superfluid film flows from the coldest towards the warmest surfaces until it evaporates. ● A special “film-burner” technique can be used to keep pressure, measured at 300 K, as low as 810-7 Torr. ● This pressure corresponds to helium density of n300K = P/kT = 2.41010 atoms/cm-3 at 300 K, or n0.3K = n300K300K/0.3K = 81011 atoms/cm-3 at 300 mK, or 1.61012 electrons/cm3, which is about 0.02% of the atomic hydrogen electron density (1016 electrons/cm3). ● This helium pressure could be significantly decreased by means of differential pumping. ● Accelerator Residual Gas Background (by EAC) ● At JLab, the accelerator residual gas pressure at room temperature is about 1·10-5 Torr. It mainly consists of N2 and water. ● The corresponding electron density is 3·1012 electrons/cm3 , or about 0.03% of the electron density of the atomic hydrogen. ● It should be mentioned that the residual gas pressure near the target would be significantly lower due to cryopumping. 20 . Conclusions ● The considerations above show that stored, longitudinally electron-spinpolarized atomic hydrogen can be used as a pure, 100% polarized gas target. ● A thickness of at least 1·1017 H/cm2 can be reached with a target diameter of 4 cm and a length of 18 cm along the beam. Possible Problems with the Electron Beam The following possible problems have not yet been evaluated: ● Atomic hydrogen ionization and excitation by the beam. ● Heating of the copper storage cell by the beam 500 MHz RF. 21