DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A CARBONATED LIQUID WHEY BASED BEVERAGE SYSTEM BY EMILY J. FREDERICK A FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE HONORS PROGRAM PROJECT ADVISOR: DR. FADI M. ARAMOUNI FOOD SCIENCE INSTITUTE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY MANHATTAN, KS MAY 2007 Frederick 1 ABSTRACT The objective of this project was to develop a value-added beverage that utilizes unprocessed liquid whey as a byproduct of cheese manufacture. Liquid whey accounts for up to ninety percent of the yield during cheese making and has historically been considered a waste product. As legal and environmentally friendly whey disposal options dwindle, alternative utilization strategies for the liquid whey must be developed. Further processing of whey, such as drying, creates a potential financial burden on small cheese producers. Considering the proteins found in whey are associated with known health benefits, the nutrient laden, unprocessed liquid whey is an ideal base for a wholesome beverage. With the advantage of added whey protein and the appeal of carbonation, the resulting carbonated protein beverage would make a unique and successful addition to the growing health beverage sector. A carbonated, liquid whey based beverage system was developed, keeping in mind the technological and financial capabilities of a small producer. The product was evaluated based on physical, microbiological, and sensory characteristics. With minor formulation changes, this beverage could realistically and competitively exist in today’s marketplace. INTRODUCTION: Whey is the yellow, watery liquid that separates from the curd during the cheese making process (Smithers et al., 1996) and contains nearly half of all solids found in whole milk (Chandan et al., 1982). It is estimated that during the production of one pound of cheese, approximately nine pounds of whey are produced (Anonymous, 2002). At one time, this whey was viewed as nothing more than a waste product. Cheese processors disposed of whey down drains until tightened environmental regulations made the dumping process illegal and expensive (Frank, 2001). Other disposal mechanisms included the discharge of whey into local waterways, the ocean, or as a component in animal feed (Smithers et al., 1996). Additionally, some whey has also been used as nutrient-laden soil enrichment in a process called landspreading. As landspreading restrictions and water treatment facility regulations continue to tighten over the next few years, cheese manufacturers will be forced to find alternative methods for disposing of or utilizing whey (Casper et al., 1999). Drying technologies are available for processing liquid whey into whey protein isolates and concentrates for an Frederick 2 abundance of applications, but the energy needs alone can overwhelm small cheese producers. Equipment costs can also be prohibitive. An alternative solution for liquid whey disposal is needed. In order to provide assistance to Alma Creamery, LLC., the Kansas Department of Commerce, a funding source for this research, has requested the development of a value-added beverage that utilizes unprocessed cheese whey as an alternative to disposing of the whey into the environment. As an extension of previous graduate research by Raymond Kassatly (Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS), the proposed beverage would continue to be formulated with a liquid whey base, but with the added value of carbonation. Whey Proteins Whey protein is a protein fraction obtained from cow’s milk. Milk contains two major protein fractions, including casein, which provides about 80% by weight of the total protein, and whey protein, which provides about 20% by weight of the total protein (Whey, 2001). While its concentration in milk is not significant, whey protein contains all of the essential amino acids, and therefore, is a high quality, “complete source” of protein (Whey, 2001). More specifically, whey proteins are a rich source of branched chain amino acids (BCAAs), containing the highest known levels of any natural food source (Miraglio, 2004). BCAAs are important for athletes, since, unlike the other essential amino acids, they are metabolized directly into muscle tissue and are the first amino acids used during periods of exercise and resistance training. While these nutritional characteristics would benefit athletes, whey protein has the potential to extend its advantages to an average consumer. In a clinical trial presented in 2006 by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) researchers found that those “consuming supplemental whey protein weighed less and put on less body fat compared to individuals who consumed a calorie-equivalent carbohydrate supplement” (Anonymous, 2006). From a functional perspective, dried whey protein is appropriate for beverage formulation in that it has a fresh, neutral taste and, therefore, can be included in other foods without adversely affecting the taste. Any flavor that is imparted from the whey protein lends itself well to citrus and fruit-flavored drinks. It is, however, important to consider that unprocessed liquid cheese whey is regarded as nearly unpalatable in its original, unprocessed form. In addition to flavor attributes, whey proteins function in an array of beverages due to their solubility over a wide pH range. The ideal pH of a proposed whey protein beverage would either be far Frederick 3 above or below the isoelectric point (pI) of whey proteins, which is 4.6. If the beverage is formulated at or near this point, the whey proteins will precipitate and beverage quality and acceptability will suffer. Commercial Whey Protein Products Given the advantages of whey protein, it has become a popular source of nutrition in a variety of forms: whey protein supplement bars, whey protein concentrates, whey protein isolates, and whey protein beverages. According to Mintel International’s Global New Products Database (GNPD), 1,763 products in the United States and 6,435 worldwide were introduced with whey ingredients in 2005 (Gottschalk, 2006). These products require that the whey be processed from its original form through drying technologies, ultrafiltration, and/or hydrolysis treatments. The intent of this research was to utilize the unprocessed cheese whey as the liquid base for a beverage. A broad and informal market evaluation of the current whey protein beverage sector shows no evidence of such a product. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preliminary Studies Preliminary experimental work was done with a variety of flavors, thickeners, and sweeteners. Extensive effort was made to combine natural and artificial flavors with protein masking agents. A final combination of fruit flavors, including raspberry, banana, and pineapple was chosen. Due to the fact that the coloring agent was dispersed in the main flavor ingredients, a creamy fuschia color resulted in the product. Various thickeners were applied to the beverage system, such as gum arabic, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), and pectin/xanthan gum blends. The use of these ingredients ultimately resulted in unfavorable results, including gritty mouthfeel and bitter flavor notes. Therefore, the use of hydrocolloids as suspension and stabilization agents in the final product was avoided in this first phase of research. Finally, experimentation with the use of various sweeteners was carried out. Fructose, acesulfame-K, high fructose corn syrup, and white grape juice concentrate were all considered, with the final choice being white grape juice concentrate because of its consumer acceptability and appropriate sweetening/flavoring capability. In order to become better acquainted with the provided pilot plant-scale carbonation equipment, numerous practice attempts were made with water, unprocessed liquid whey, and preliminary formulations of the beverage. In doing Frederick 4 so, issues with protein foaming, consistency in carbonation levels, and equipment maintenance issues were discovered. Through trial and error, coupled with continued informal sensory evaluation by a panel of food scientists, a final acceptable beverage formula was developed, as shown by the formulation in Table 1. Table 1. Ingredient Amount (% by weight) Sweet Liquid Whey 85.90 80% Whey Protein Concentrate 3.97 Protein Masking Agent 0.10 White Grape Juice Concentrate 8.94 Citric Acid, anhydrous 0.26 Natural & Artificial Flavoring 0.78 Anti-Foaming Agent 0.05 Processing Frozen liquid cheddar cheese whey was received from a commercial cheese manufacturing facility (Alma, KS). The liquid whey was kept frozen at -20oC until use (within 3 months). The frozen whey was thawed at refrigeration temperatures and then filtered through a sieve to remove any physical traces of the cheese manufacturing process. The remaining ingredients were added to the whey in the following order: whey protein concentrate, protein masking agent, white grape juice concentrate, citric acid, flavors, and an anti foaming agent. With continuous stirring, the mixture was heated and pasteurized at 73 oC for 20 seconds to remove all pathogenic microorganisms, as well as some yeasts or molds. The heat-treated beverage was placed in a cooler to facilitate immediate chilling and continued to chill overnight. The beverage was carbonated using a Series 9000 Zahm Pilot Plant Filter, Carbonator, and Filler (Zahm and Nagel, Holland, NY). Prior to carbonation, the tank and fill lines were sanitized with a 200ppm chlorine bleach solution in potable water. The chilled beverage mix was placed into the sanitized tank which was subsequently placed into a aluminum pail of salted ice water. The mixture was chilled to 5oC in order to facilitate better dissolution of carbon dioxide in the beverage. Following the manufacturer’s directions, the beverage was carbonated at a pressure of 25 pounds per square inch (psi). Frederick 5 Once carbonated, the beverage was filled into 12 ounce glass bottles and capped with a metal lid. The filled bottles were then immediately stored at 4 oC and held for subsequent evaluation. pH The pH values were measured using a Fisher Accument® Model AP 63 pH meter with a pH/Automatic Temperature Compensation (ATC) combination electrode calibrated at pH 7.0. Measurements of pH were taken on the uncarbonated and carbonated samples in duplicates and an average was calculated. Brix Soluble solids content was measured using an Abbe Mark2 Refractometer (Cambridge Instruments Inc., Buffalo, NY). Samples were loaded into the machine and viewed through the eyepiece for adjustment until the color zone separation matched the cross-hair line. The % Brix was then read directly from the display and recorded. Duplicate measurements were taken from both the uncarbonated and carbonated samples and then averaged. Color Color measurements were made using a HunterLab MiniScan™ MS/S-4000S spectrocolorimeter (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., Reston, VA) to determine the L*, a*, and b* values of the uncarbonated and carbonated samples. The MiniScan™ was standardized with a black light trap and white color tile before the first sample was measured. Samples were placed in a polysterene clear cup with a plastic ring inside holding the sample in place and then covered with a black cup to prevent light from reflecting and interfering with the measurement. L*, a*, and b* values were measured three times and then averaged. Duplicates were made with all samples. L* represents the whiteness of a sample, where 100 represents white and 0 is black. A positive ‘a*’ value indicates redness, and a negative ‘a*’ value indicates greenness. A positive ‘b*’ value represents yellowness and a negative ‘b*’ value represents blueness (Hunter, 1996). Carbonation Level Volumes of carbon dioxide in the carbonated beverage were measured using a Series 6000 Zahm Model D.T. Piercing Device (Zahm and Nagel, Holland, NY). The full bottle of carbonated beverage was inverted and subsequently pierced with the device. The pressure inside the bottle was measured directly from the Frederick 6 accompanying gauge. The device’s thermometer was inserted into the product and the temperature was read directly. Based on a table provided with the carbonation equipment, the total volume of carbon dioxide dissolved in the product was calculated. Duplicate measurements were taken from the carbonated sample and then averaged. Microbiological AOAC methods 986.33 and 989.10 for dairy products were used to detect the presence of aerobic bacteria in both the uncarbonated and the carbonated beverage products. One milliliter of the product, diluted to 1:10 and 1:100 with serial dilutions, was plated on 3M™ Petrifilm™ (Aerobic Count Plates, 3M, MN) and then incubated at 32°C ± 1°C for 48h ± 3h. AOAC 997.02 method was used to detect the presence of yeast and mold in both the uncarbonated and carbonated beverage products. One milliliter of the product, using the previously stated serial dilutions, was plated using 3M™ Petrifilm™ (Yeast and Mold Plates, 3M, MN) and incubated at 20-25°C for 3 to 5 days. AOAC method 983.25 was used to detect the presence of total coliforms in both the uncarbonated and carbonated beverage products. One milliliter of the product, using the previously stated serial dilutions, was plated on 3M™ Petrifilm™ (ECC Plates, 3M, MN) and then incubated at 32°C ± 1°C for 48h ± 3h. Sensory Faculty, staff and students participated in an informal sensory study. Consumers (n=35) were asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding age, gender, and beverage consumption habits. An informed consent form listing ingredients and potential ingredients in the beverage was signed by each participant prior to tasting. Consumers were asked to evaluate the sample for overall liking, appearance, mouthfeel, flavor, and sweetness on a 9-point hedonic scale anchored on the left by 1 (“dislike extremely”) and on the right by 9 (“like extremely”). Nutrition Labeling The basic nutritional content was determined for the carbonated beverage using the Genesis R&D labeling program (ESHA Research, Salem, OR). The serving size was reported by FDA (21 CFR 101.9 (b)). Frederick 7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: pH The pH measurements for the uncarbonated and the carbonated samples were 4.24 and 4.13, respectively. This decrease in pH can be explained by the conversion of carbon dioxide into carbonic acid. The presence of the carbonic acid increases the concentration of hydrogen ions in solution, thus lowering the pH. A final pH of 4.13 is ideal for this beverage system as it falls far enough away from the previously mentioned isoelectric point of whey proteins and will thus prevent undesirable protein precipitation. Brix The °Brix for the uncarbonated and the carbonated samples was 13.9 and 15, respectively, as shown in Table 2. These data are indicative of the amount of sugar and/or soluble solids in the product, and therefore, suggestive of the sweetness of the beverage. Color According to the results for the color readings shown in Table 2, the uncarbonated sample appears darker in color, as indicated by a lower L* value. The higher a* value in the carbonated sample indicates that it is more red. Not much difference is seen in the b* values of the two samples, indicating that they have similar yellowness. Carbonation Level After carbonation, the resulting product contained an average of 2.2 volumes of carbon dioxide. This amount of gas was suggestive of the final mouthfeel of the product, ranging from “sparkling” (too little carbonation) to “foamy” (too much carbonation). The use of the pilot carbonation equipment made it difficult to control the final concentration of carbon dioxide. The final volume of CO2 was contingent upon the accuracy and consistency of the original carbonation pressure, the temperature of the bottle, and the rapidity of the bottle capping. Frederick 8 Table 2. Physical Analyses of Uncarbonated and Carbonated Beverage Physical Property Pre-Carbonation Post-Carbonation pH 4.24 4.13 Brix (% Soluble Solids) 13.9 15.0 Color L*: 23.72 L*: 26.98 a*: 8.26 a*: 11.11 b*: 3.07 b*: 3.56 Carbonation N/A Temperature: 7°C Gage Pressure (psi):10 Volumes of CO2 : 2.2 Microbiological It was the microbial testing that revealed a setback in the realistic development of the carbonated liquid whey beverage. According to Table 3, the pasteurization process for the uncarbonated sample proved to be efficient. The carbonated sample, however, showed results that were unexpectedly high in all three microbial sampling tests. It was concluded that while appropriate sanitizing measures were taken in preparing the tank and fill lines, the pilot level of production is not adequate to produce a carbonated protein beverage with an adequate shelf-life to commercialize the product. Alternative post-processing pasteurization techniques are limited, as heating post-carbonation could greatly diminish the dissolved volumes of carbon dioxide in the product. Table 3. Microbial Results for Uncarbonated and Carbonated Beverage Type of Analysis Uncarbonated Carbonated Aerobic Plate Count (APC) <10 CFU/mL 300 CFU/mL Yeast and Mold (YM) < 10 CFU/mL 8000 CFU/mL E. coli / Coliform (ECC) 30 CFU/mL 300 CFU/mL Sensory Participants ranged in age from 18 to 50 years old. There were fewer males that participated than females, with 23 females and 12 males. 100 percent of the respondents had at least some college education. Approximately 43% of participants claimed to “never” consume protein beverages, and only 5% claimed to consume protein beverages once per week. Approximately 71% of respondents consume carbonated beverages anywhere from everyday to once a week. Mean values for overall acceptability, appearance, flavor, sweetness and mouthfeel are given in Table 4. Based on a 9 point hedonic scale, the average score for overall acceptability was a 5.74. Using the scale provided to panelists, the product should average a ‘6’ or above before being launched into the market. Frederick 9 As an extension of the evaluation, more consumers would be surveyed and current whey protein beverages would be compared to the test product. A trained panel may be needed to narrow in on what attributes are disliked in the product and what consumers are looking for. Table 4. Sensory Evaluation of Carbonated Beverage Category Score Overall Acceptability 5.74 ± 1.6 Appearance 6.74 ± 1.2 Flavor 5.44 ± 1.7 Sweetness 5.97 ± 1.4 Mouthfeel 5.35 ± 1.6 Nutritional Labeling After input of the beverage formula into the Genesis R&D computer database, the following nutritional label resulted: Figure 1. Nutritional Label Frederick 10 CONCLUSION: A carbonated liquid whey based beverage system was developed and prepared as an alternative solution to both ground disposal and burdensome and expensive drying of liquid whey. The results indicated the feasibility of such a system, although challenges remain. Other factors that may be of interest in continued studies include evaluation of shelf stability, variation in flavors and colors, effective use of hydrocolloids for particle suspension, and alternative postprocessing pasteurization techniques. Economic feasibility and marketing research will also need to be performed to ensure the success of the product. Frederick 11 REFERENCES: Anonymous. 2006. Dairy whey does a body good. Food Product Design Online. Available from: www.foodproductdesign.com. Accessed February 10, 2006. Burrington, KJ. 2002. More than just milk. Food Product Design Online. Available from: www.foodproductdesign.com. Accessed November 15, 2006. Burrington, KJ. 2005. Pouring out blended beverages. Food Product Design Online. Available from: www.foodproductdesign.com. Accessed November 9, 2006. Casper, JL.; WL Wendorff; DL Thomas. 1999. Functional properties of whey protein concentrates from caprine and ovine specialty cheese wheys. Journal of Dairy Science. Vol. 82. p. 265-271. de Wit, JN. 1998. Nutritional and functional characteristics of whey proteins in food products. Journal of Dairy Science. Vol. 81. p. 597-608. Ellsworth, M. 2003. Evaluation of carboxymethyl cellulose and high methoxyl pectin on the stability of acidified milk and juice beverages. Master’s thesis. Kansas State University. Manhattan, KS. Frank, P. 2001. Finding the whey. Food Processing Online. Available from: www.legacymeadowfresh.com. Accessed December, 2006. Gottschalk, L. 2006. Winning wheys in bars and beverages. Prepared Foods Online. Available at: www.preparedfoods.com. Accessed on: March 20, 2007. Hunter Lab. 1996. Hunter lab color scale. Insights on color. Vol. 8, No. 9. Available at: www.hunterlab.com/appnotes. Accessed April 03, 2007. Miraglio, AM. 2004. Wheying the positives. Prepared Foods Online. Available at www.preparedfoods.com. Accessed on: March 20, 2007. Roberts, WA. 2004. New product trends: drinking games. Prepared Foods Online. Available at www.preparedfoods.com. Accessed on: March 20, 2007. Smithers, GW; FJ Ballard; AD Copeland; KJ De Silva; DA Dionysius; GL Francis; C Godard; PA Griece; GH McIntosh; IR Mitchell; RJ Pearce; GO Regester. 1996. New opportunities from the isolation and utilization of whey proteins. Symposium: advances in dairy foods processing and engineering. Journal of Dairy Science. Vol. 79. p 1454-1459. Varnam, AH, Sutherland, JP. 1994. Beverages: technology, chemistry and microbiology. London: Chapman & Hall. Frederick 12 Whey Protein Institute. 2001. Whey protein www.wheyoflife.org. Accessed on 22 February, 2007. facts. Zayas, JF. Functionality of proteins in food. 1997. Berlin: Springer. . Available at: