Using the information we already know about the geometric

advertisement
Congruent Polygons
Using the information we already know about the geometric figure, we
are going to learn to prove that two polygons are congruent, beginning
with triangles.
 To prove that two triangles (or any polygons) are congruent, we
must be able to show that their corresponding sides and their
corresponding angles are congruent.
o Corresponding sides — When dealing with two polygons, their
corresponding sides are the sides that sit in the same position or
occupy the same spot in each polygon.
o Corresponding angles — The angles that sit in the same
position or occupy the same spot in the polygon.
A
B
P
C
Q
R
EX: Given ABC  PQR
Corresponding angles:  A corresponds to  P
Corresponding segments: AB corresponds to PQ
1
M&G 3.4 Instruction
Congruent Polygons
Postulate – A statement about relationships in mathematics that are
accepted as true without proof.
We are going to use two cases/conditions that will allow us to prove
that two triangles are congruent.
o Side-Angle-Side congruence postulate (SAS)—says that two
triangles are congruent if two sides and the angle included
between them are congruent to the corresponding two sides and
angle between them in a second triangle.
o Side-Side-Side congruence postulate
(SSS)—says that two
A
triangles are congruent if all three sides of one triangle are
congruent to all three sides of a second triangle.
A
J
EX 1:
C
B
L
K
Prove that  ABC is congruent to  JKL.
1. m AB = m JK
2. m AC  mJL
3. mBC  mKL
4.  ABC   JKL by SSS
2
M&G 3.4 Instruction
Congruent Polygons
M
P
EX 2:
O
N
Q
R
Prove that  MNO is congruent to  PQR
1. OM  RP
2. MN  PQ
3.  OMN   RPQ (  M   P)
4.  MNO   PQR by SAS
S
EX 3:
R
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
3
T
G
F
H
RS  FG
ST  GH
R  F
Are the triangles congruent?
This is a non-example since the angles that are congruent in
each triangle are not the included angle and we can see that
M&G 3.4 Instruction
Congruent Polygons
the triangles are not congruent. ASS is not a valid triangle
congruence postulate
CHECK FOR UNDERSTANDING:
On your white board, tell me whether or not each pair of triangles is
congruent. If they are congruent, write a statement of congruency and
tell me how you know that they are congruent.
For example:
G
D
1.
F
H
E
DEF  HGF because of the SAS Postulate.
Z
2.
W
4
X
Y
M&G 3.4 Instruction
Congruent Polygons
3.
I
F
D
G
E
B
H
E
4.
D
C
A
F
5.
P
J
M
N
5
K
L
M&G 3.4 Instruction
Congruent Polygons
A
EX5:
B
C
D
 Given  ABC, AB  AC and AD bisects  A.
 Prove that  ACD   ABD
o AB  AC because it is given.
o  BAD =  CAD because  A is bisected by AD and
bisecting an angle creates two equal angles.
o AD  AD because it is itself (reflexive property).
o  ACD   ABD by the SAS postulate.
A
EX 6:
F
B
C
E
D
This is a regular hexagon with 2 diagonals drawn. Prove that
 FAB   CDE
6
M&G 3.4 Instruction
Congruent Polygons
 AB  DE and AF  DC since all sides are congruent in a
regular hexagon.
  A =  D since all angles are congruent in a regular hexagon.
  FAB   CDE by SAS postulate.
CFU – Are the parallelograms pictured below congruent? How
do you know this?
B
A
7
C
D
P
Q
S
M&G 3.4 Instruction
R
Download