Otology Seminar 90-8-8 Middle ear mechanics for diseased and reconstructed ears R3 葉春風 A. Introduction John J. Rosowski Ph.D. (Eaton-Peabody Lab of MEEI), Saumil N. Merchant M.D.(ENT of MEEI) Mathematically describe the contribution of each part of the ear’s structure to sound flow through the ear Establish a model to expain and quantify the pathophysiology of conductive hearing loss, quantify structure-function relationship Predict the result of middle ear reconstructive surgeryif match with clinical observationconfirm the model B. Sound transmission of normal human middle ear Can be quantified by 3 quantities The conductive hearing loss can be predicted by how these quantities are altered. Ossicular coupling—Ps Refered to the sound pressure gain(stapes vs ear canal) through TM and ossicle chain Traditional acoustic transformer model : area ratio, ossicular lever (27-30 dB), catenary lever (34 dB), gain is frequency independent It’s not accurate, TM movement not like a rigid piston, not all TM motion transferred to stapes motion. Middle ear pressure gain smaller than believed: 20 dB for 250 to 0.5k Hz, 25 dB at 1 kHz, decrease at 6dB per octave at > 1kHzfig2 Pressure gain is frequency dependent Middle ear aeration is important for ossicular coupling. Nonaeration lead to reduction of or loss of ossicular coupling. TM motion is driven by pressure difference Pec-Pme Normally aerated ears Redduction of ME aerationincrease ME impedanceincrease Pmereduction of Pec-Pmereduction of TM and ossicle motion To keep ossicular coupling 10 dB within normal, at least 0.5 cc is needed. Acoustic coupling-- P The difference of sound pressure directly acting on oval and round window EEC sound pressureTM motionsound pressure in MEPow and Prw are nearly the same but not identical P=Pow-Prw Relatively very small and can be omitted in normal ears. But important in some diseased and reconstructed ears Ossicular coupling dominant in normal ears. If losing it , there will be large hearing loss. Bekesy measured it in temporal bone without TM or ossicles P=Ps – 30 to 50 dB Normal ear, with intact TM and ossicle chain : 10-20 dB less than Bekesy, 60dB smaller than Ps Maximal P= ~40dB above normal ear, ~20dB smaller than Ps. Occurred when one window is equal to EEC pressure with acoustic shield to greatly reduce other window pressure. Acoustic coupling includes relative magnitude and phase between oval and round window. But in ideal type IV tympanoplasty, magnitude difference existed. The cochlea input depends on magnitude-difference. ( phase-difference is not so important) Stapes-cochlear impedance--Zsc Zsc = cochlear load = Opposition of footplate movement by annular ligament, cochlear fluid, cochlear partition, and R-W membrane In normal ear, the R-W membrane impedance is small Otosclerosisstapes fixationZsc increase Non aerated middle earfluid or fibrous tissue near R-W nicheincrease R-W impedanceZsc increase 量化中耳傳音機轉 Stapes volume velocity (Us)as a measure of middle ear performance (EQN 1) Us = ( Ps + P) / Zsc Degree of conductive hearing loss can be predicted by normal Us/altered Us and convert to dB In diseased middle ear Ossicular interuption with intact TM No ossicular coupling, only acoustic coupling provides cochlea input Fig2Ps - P in normal ear = 50-60dB EQN1predict ABG 50-60 dB Loss of TM, malleus, incus No ossicular coupling, all depends on acoustic coupling EQN1ABG 40-50 dB Similar to large perforation, ossicle interuption Fixation of ossicles Stapes fixation in otosclerosisZsc increaseUs decrease At < 1kHz, Zsc dominated by annular ligamentany change in ligament is first seen on low tone. eg. Otosclerosis ABG5~50 dB Malleus fixation, usually from bony spur from epitympanic wall to malleus headthe point of fixation was near the malleus rotation axismalleus movement only partially reducedABG 15-25 dB Atelectasis of TM Clinically TM atelectasis with intact mobile ossicles can produce 0-50 dB ABG ME & RW aerated 50% decrease in ossicular coupling will produce 6 dB ABG 66% decrease 10 dB ABG ME & RW loss of aeration loss of ossicular coupling, TM invaginate to oval and round window niche, the pressure be near ear canal pressure40-50 dB ABG Perforation of TM Clinical observation—ABG range from 0-40 dB, ABG are greater for low frequencies(< 1-2 kHz) Mechanism 1—loss of pressure-force couplingreduction of ossicular couplingreduction is proportional to size Mechanism 2—loss of pressure difference across TM, this effect is greater at low tone C. In the post-tympanomastoid surgery ears Tympanoplasty classification:modified by Nadol & Schuknecht from Wullstein Decreased middle ear air space volume Middle ear air space = air in tympanic cavity + mastoid air cell , in the model 6 cc Sound pressurecompress the air + overcome the resistance of others Air volume largeZcav small Zt determined by Ztoclarge middle ear air volume had little effect on middle ear mechanics Air volume smallZcav can be larger than Ztoc 1.5 cc2 dB ABG below 1 kHz 0.4 ccnearly 10 dB low tone ABG 0.1 cc19 dB below 0.8k 0.001cca small air bubbleABG at least 60 dB Canal down mastoidectemyresidual air only in mesotympanumonly 0.5 cc12 fold volume reductionpredicted ABG < 10 dB Further reduction of air space in poor E tube functioncause larger ABGFig 7 Tympanomastoid surgery should provide air space at least 0.5 cc, better at 1 cc for best acoustic result Air space > 1cc provide no significant additional acoustic benefit Without ossicular linkage—type IV, V Depends solely on acoustic coupling, no ossicular coupling Type IVSound directly onto stapes footplate, a fascia graft put between round window and ear canalthe effect is to reduce the round window sound pressure magnitude Four elements model include impedance of footplate, round window air space(cavum minor), shield Model analyses sugst the best hearing result normal footplate mobility, stiff enough acoustic shield, aeration of cavum minor at least 0.1 cc to achieve maximal acoustic coupling, EQN 1 got ABG = 20 dB, consistent of reported best result of Wullstein Shield impedancesnme as TM got >40 dB hearing loss30 to 300 fold TM impedance got optimal result Impedance is related to the third power of shield thicknessoptimal is 1 mm thickness Leave the footplate as mobile as possible by cover it with a thin STSG not a fascia graft Keep cavum minor aeration at least 0.03 cc Type V—if footplate ankylosed, remove it and replace by a fat graft With preservation of ossicular linkage—type I, II, III Type I—repair of TM perforation with mobile and intact ossicle Type II—use of bone strut to continue between incus long process and stapes head Type III—1. Stapes columella-TM graft onto stapes head. 2.minor columella-a strut from stapes head to manubrium/TM. 3.Major columella-a strut from footplate to manubrium/TM Good hearing result depends on ME and R-W aeration to keep Ps, P, Zsc normal or near normal Adequately aeratedpostop ABG <= 20-25 dB wth suboptimal TM-ossicle configuration Non-aerated filled with fluid or fibrous tissuePs decrease, increasepost op ABG 50-60 dB To further improveenhance ossicular couplingthe following 4 aspects P unchange, Zsc Stiffness not important if strut stiffness >>>Zsc with good fixation columella with ossicle, cortical bone, or hydroxapatite is enough Ossicular mass Some limited experiments suggest that ossicular mass do not limit ME function. Stapes mass 3 mg—16 folds increase produces less than 10 dB ABG, mainly at high tone. Malleus and incus—model analog 7.9 mg, but real mass 60 mg--it may be due to the M & I rotate with a center of gravity and got a smaller rotational inertial mass. Ossicular prosthesis—do not rotate, like stapes—TORP 48 mg produces hearing result like 16 folds-normal stapes mass Mass is not a major concern for stapedotomy or ossicular prosthesis Position of columella Vlaming & Feenstra:stapes and prosthesis angle < 45 satisfactory sound transmission Optimal tension between TM/malleus and stapes head/footplate Too high or low tension will decrease sound transmission