NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
01
16 February 2005
NROTC UNIT PHILADELPHIA INSTRUCTION 1601.2B
Subj: MIDSHIPMAN APTITUDE EVALUATION
Ref:
(a) CNETINST 1533.12G (MIDN Regs)
(b) CNET P1533/3 series (NAM)
Encl: (1) Instructions for completing the Midshipman Evaluation
Report and Counseling Record
(2) Blank Midshipman Evaluation Report and Counseling
Record
(3) Sample Completed Midshipman Evaluation Report and
Counseling Record
1. Purpose. To establish, in accordance with references (a)
and (b), an evaluation system for use by the Philadelphia NROTC
Consortium that will provide for consistency and uniformity
while producing fair and accurate appraisal of Midshipman
performance.
2.
Cancellation.
3.
Background.
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2A
a. Important changes to this instruction are noted in bold
italics.
b. The NROTC evaluation system is a standardized approach
for evaluating officer potential of NROTC scholarship and
college program students during all phases of their education.
c. Since STA-21 and MECP students remain on active duty and
are evaluated during their regular annual cycle, they are exempt
from the requirements of this instruction and shall not be
included in the summary group in block 26 of enclosure (2).
While exempt from formal ranking, they may be added to their
peer group ranking when being submitted for awards, scholarships
and/or grants. In this instance, it is incumbent upon the
Advisor(s) to make a concerted effort to properly rank them
among other Midshipmen and not to put them at the top merely to
garner an award.
Page 1 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
d. Enclosure (1) is the standard Midshipman Evaluation
Report and Counseling Record and shall be completed at the end
of every ROTC academic semester.
e. Enclosure (1) was previously used by NSTC as a nationwide evaluation tool. Reference (b) has been modified and now
recommends that units use the standard Navy Officer FITREP form.
While the FITREP form has merit in that a future Navy officer is
exposed to the form that is used in the fleet, it is neither the
form used by USMC officers nor is a Midshipman’s performance
easily articulated in the FITREP format. This point was brought
to the attention of NSTC (ODM) during the June 04 Command
Inspection; NSTC (ODM) agreed and was taking action to change
ref (b). Enclosure (1) shall therefore be used by the
Philadelphia Consortium pending receipt of a revised NSTC form.
f. Peer evaluations allow the Midshipman chain of command
the opportunity to practice eval writing skills and provide
recommendations to the class advisors. The class advisor’s
average grade, however, will be the sole input for determining
aptitude with respect to OPMIS entries and ROTC Scholarship
inputs/Service Selection.
g. The terms Advisor, Class Advisor, and Officer/Instructor
are used synonymously in this instruction.
h. The Freshman Instructor shall advise and write
evaluations on all incoming Navy and Marine Corps scholarship
and college program students for their initial fall term. Upon
returning from break in January, the MOI shall take over
responsibility for advising and evaluating 4th Class Marine
Option Midshipmen. The MOI shall continue to retain
advising/evaluating responsibilities for all 1st, 2nd and 3rd
Class Marine Option Midshipmen.
i. The Senior Instructor shall write evaluations on all
first semester seniors. Since most seniors will not be
available after the spring evaluation cycle, the Senior
Instructor shall write an eval on the number one Midshipman in
the graduating class; he/she shall also write an eval for the
record on any Midshipman who had issues worthy of documenting in
an official capacity. Examples: poor academic performance,
notable inaptitude, or medical issues that did not prohibit
commissioning, but that raised concern during the spring
semester.
Page 2 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
4. Importance. The aptitude marks that a Midshipman receives
on his/her evaluations are included in a composite average that
impacts scholarship selection (for college program students),
service selection (for scholarship and advanced standing
students) and ship selection (for SWO selectees).
5. Evaluation Writing Process. The initial grader will start
the evaluation report by filling in all personal data and
evaluating the midshipman before passing it to the secondary
grader for their marks and comments. The Advisor will finish
the report and sign it prior to forwarding, via the Executive
Officer, to the Commanding Officer. The Commanding Officer will
sign each report, prior to the individual being evaluated. The
Advisor will complete the process by debriefing and obtaining
the signature of the midshipman.
6.
Responsibilities
a. Commanding Officer. Review completed evaluations and
sign (provide comments to stimulate individual Midshipman growth
as required/desired).
b. Executive Officer. Review submissions for
administrative correctness and ensure an evaluation for each
Midshipman is provided to the CO.
c.
Battalion Advisor
(1) Ensure the Midshipman chain of command provides
smooth evaluation inputs for each Midshipman a minimum of two
weeks before the end of each NROTC semester. The end of the
NROTC semester is defined as the last lab/drill period. Block 5
of encl (1), Date of Report, shall be the date of the last
lab/drill period.
(2) Ensure all reports have been received, immediately
review for completeness, and disseminate reports to Class
Advisors. Immediately return any unacceptable evaluation input
for correction.
(3) If Class advisors must return reports for rework,
the battalion advisor shall coordinate with the appropriate
Midshipman staff member(s) to ensure prompt correction and
resubmission in order to be complete prior to the semester’s
end.
Page 3 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
d. Staff Physical Readiness Program Coordinator/AMOI.
Consolidate Midshipman PFA/PRT results and disseminate them to
Class Advisors/MOI for inclusion in Evaluations. Results shall
be available to advisors within two weeks of PFA/PRT completion.
e.
Class Advisors
(1) When semester evaluations are received from the
battalion advisor, perform an immediate check of each evaluation
for completeness and content. Return unsatisfactory
evaluations, with rationale, to the battalion advisor for rework
by the Midshipman ranks.
(2) Ensure all NROTC Scholarship and College Program
students are evaluated at the end of each semester. Completed
evaluations shall be forwarded to the Executive Officer within
two weeks of receiving semester grades from the university(ies).
(3) Debrief completed evaluations with Midshipmen during
the first two weeks of the following semester. Half-way through
the semester, complete a separate mid-term counseling session
with each Midshipman. This counseling session shall be
documented in the final evaluation of the semester.
(4) Ensure NROTC students who are given low or marginal
aptitude marks in any marking period are properly counseled.
(5) As warranted or required by reference (b), schedule
a Performance Review Board for those displaying marginal or
unsatisfactory aptitude.
J. B. HULICK
Page 4 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE MIDSHIPMAN EVALUATION REPORT AND
COUNSELING RECORD
1. The following detailed guidelines shall be used in
completing enclosure (2).
a. Block 1 - Name. Midshipman’s last name, first name
middle initial, and suffix, if any, separated by spaces. Place
a comma after the last name. Omit spaces and punctuation within
a name. If the midshipman has no middle nor or initial, enter
NMN. Examples: SMITH, WYATT B; OBRIEN, SUSAN J; HALL, BETTY
NMN; WHITE, JOHN B JR.
b. Block 2 – Class Year. Grade or rank that the member is
wearing during the semester being evaluated. Examples: MIDN
4/C; MIDN 3/C; MIDN 2/C; MIDN 1/C.
c. Block 3 – Company-Squad. Enter the Midshipman’s
Company-Squad (just the company if reporting on Company
Commander or Company CPO) or BATSTAFF. Examples: A; B-2ND SQD;
BATSTAFF.
d. Block 4 – Occasion For Report. Mark the correct Block
with an "x." Use the other Block if this report is a special
report.
e. Block 5 – Date of Report. Enter the date the term ended
- use the last official lab/drill period of the NROTC semester.
Date must be written in YRMONDY format. Example: 04DEC07.
f. Block 6 – Type of Report. There are only two types of
reports: Regular (an evaluation received at the end of the term)
or Special (any other time an evaluation is done). Place an "x"
in the appropriate box.
g. Blocks 7a, 7b, 7c – Latest PFA/PFT Date, Score,
Readiness. Enter the date that the PFA/PFT was taken (Date must
be written in YRMONDY format) in block 7a. Enter the score
received by the midshipman in block 7b. Place an "x" in the
appropriate box whether the individual is within standards (WS)
or not within height/weight standards (NS). Navy Examples:
04NOV11 OL
WS , GL 95DEC04
WS, FAIL 00NOV08
NS. USMC
Examples: 04DEC13 285 WS, 04APR25 300 WS.
h. Block 8 – Sail Qualification.
appropriate box.
Put an "x" in the
Enclosure (1)
Page 5 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
i. Block 9 – Swim Qualification/Date.
correct box and enter the date achieved.
Put an "x" in the
j. Block 10a – Duties Assigned. Identify any billet that
the midshipman was assigned; or, enter None. Examples: Company
Commander, Squad Leader, Battalion Commander, None.
k. Block 10b – Major. Enter the University-acknowledged
major. If a Midshipman is attempting to, but hasn’t officially
changed majors, the new major should be included in parenthesis.
If the long title does not fit, standard abbreviations may be
used. Examples: Chemical Engineering, Chem Eng, Astrophysics,
Mech Eng (History).
l. Block 11 – Honors/Awards. Enter any awards or honors
received from the University or the Battalion during the
reporting period. Since Advisors do not submit completed
evaluations until the semester GPA has been received, Class
Advisors shall annotate Dean’s list or Academic Stars for
performance in the semester being evaluated. Should an
instructor inadvertently miss the award notation during the
semester earned, it can be noted on the following evaluation
(but should be qualified by the semester in which it was
earned). Examples: Dean’s List, Physical Fitness Awards,
Academic Stars; Academic Stars (F03).
m. Blocks 12-14 – Midterm Counseling. While not precluding
Midshipman-to-Midshipman counseling sessions, these blocks shall
document the Officer/Instructor’s midterm counseling session
with the subject Midshipman. Enter the date (same format as in
block 5) the midterm counseling took place in Block 12. The
name of the instructor conducting the counseling shall go in
Block 13. The individual who was counseled shall sign Block 14.
Verbal counseling, with appropriate and immediate notes placed
in the Midshipman Personnel Record will suffice for documenting
midterm counseling.
n. Blocks 15-20 – Performance Traits. For each trait,
place an "x" in one and only one box. The meaning of the trait
grades are printed on the form, along with the representative
performance standards. The 3.0 grade represents performance to
full NROTC standards. The 1.0 grade means generally poor
performance which is not improving, or unsatisfactory
performance with respect to a single standard. For the majority
of midshipman, most trait grades should fall in the 3.0 to 4.0
range. The primary, secondary and Officer/Instructor will mark
on "x" in the appropriate box. The primary grader shall put
Enclosure (1)
Page 6 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
their "x" in the first box, the secondary grader shall put their
"x" in middle box and the Officer/Instructor shall place their
"x" in the last box. The Officer/Instructor shall also place an
“x” in the appropriate box that was discussed during mid-term
counseling. For Military Bearing/Appearance: A 5.0 grade
requires a PFA/PFT score of excellent or outstanding. However,
do not grade 5.0 unless the midshipman also meets the other 5.0
standards for this trait.
o. Block 21 – Growth Potential.
graded by the Officer/Instructor.
Growth Potential is only
p. Block 22 – Billet Recommendation. Enter one or two
billet recommendations. The second billet recommendation is not
required. Do not leave blank. If no recommendation is
appropriate (1st semester freshmen), enter None. These are the
Officer/Instructor recommendations, based on performance and
seniority. For most midshipman the recommendation should be the
next significant billet position. Examples: None, Squad Leader,
DMO.
q. Blocks 23 & 24 - Comments on Performance
(Primary/Secondary Grader).
(1) Be concise. Space is limited, bullet style is
preferred. Spelling and grammar count – use spell check, but
don’t rely on it as your sole source; proofread!
(2) Use everyday language. Do not use flowery
adjectives or other extremes of style. Let the midshipman's
performance speak louder than your words.
(3) Give examples of performance and results.
specific. Concentrate on verifiable accomplishments.
(4) Don't make everyone sound alike.
unique and deserves to be noted as such.
(5) Grader’s Name.
right corner.
r.
Be
Each midshipman is
Type the grader’s name in lower
Block 25 - Comments on Performance (Officer/Instructor).
(1) Term/Cum GPA & Term/Cum Aptitude Grade. Fill in both
blocks. GPA shall include all Naval Science grades if not
already part of GPA. Some Universities do not give credit for
Enclosure (1)
Page 7 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
Naval Science classes so these need to be manually added into
the final GPA.
(2) Signature. Type Officer/Instructor name in lower
right corner and sign above it.
s. Block 26 – Midshipman Ranking. The Freshman Instructor
shall rank all Marine and Navy Option Midshipmen together during
the fall evaluation. After the MOI takes responsibility for
evaluating Marine Option Midshipmen, Navy Options shall be
ranked independently of Marine Options.
(1) The Officer/Instructor will place an "x" in the box
that correctly reflects the Midshipman's “Individual” ranking.
The recommendation may be NOB if appropriate, e.g., short period
of report.
(2) "Top Tier", "Second Tier", "Middle Tier" are positive
midshipman ranking recommendations. The recommendation should
be consistent with performance trait grades, and take into
account the midshipman's future value to the Navy or Marine
Corps.
(3) "Fourth Tier" means that the midshipman is making
progress but is not ready to be ranked higher.
(4) "Bottom Tier" means that the midshipman has serious
short comings that must be addressed prior to them receiving a
higher ranking, and this must be justified in the comments.
(5) Upper limits on "Top Tier" Recommendations. The
number of "Top Tier" recommendations are limited to 20% of each
group ranking (rounded up to the nearest whole number). There
are no further limitations on remaining numbers. Example:
Assume 37 Navy Option 2/C Midshipmen with 20% maximum in the Top
Tier; 37 x 0.2 = 7.4 = 8 (rounded up). Therefore, eight
Midshipmen may be ranked in the “Top Tier” while the remaining
Midshipmen may be placed in the categories that the
Officer/Instructor deems appropriate.
(6) The “summary” block shall list the numbers of all
Midshipmen in that ranking group and the breakout of how many
fall in each tier. Only include the number of people who
completed the semester; do not include those who are on overseas
study or personal LOAs, nor those who dropped during the
semester. If there are 37 being ranked, the sum of numbers in
all tiers shall equal 37. Example: MIDN Jones is the individual
Enclosure (1)
Page 8 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
being ranked. His evaluation puts him in the second tier (the
second tier block is x’d). The instructor has decided to rank
the full 20% allotment of Top Tier Midshipmen (8), and has split
the remaining 29 Midshipmen among the fourth, middle and second
tiers (the numbers 0 + 2 + 12 + 15 + 8 = 37).
26. Midshipman Ranking
NOB
Bottom
Tier
Fourth
Tier
Middle
Tier
Second
Tier
Top
Tier
N/A
0
2
12
15
8
Individual
Summary
t. Block 28 – Signature of Midshipman Evaluated. After
reviewing the report, the midshipman will sign and date the
report. A signature is also required in Block 14. A signature
does not imply agreement with the report or satisfaction with
the counseling, it merely certifies that the midshipman has
reviewed the report. If the midshipman wants to make a
statement about their evaluation, they should check yes in block
29 and provide a statement to be attached to their evaluation.
Enclosure (1)
Page 9 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
SAMPLE MIDSHIPMAN EVALUATION REPORT AND COUNSELING RECORD
1. Name (Last, First MI suffix)
2. Class Year
3. Company – Squad
4. Occasion for Report
Fall
Spring
Other
7a. PFA/PFT
7b. PFA/PFT
Date:
Score:
10a. Duties Assigned:
5. Date of Report
6. Type of Report
Regular
Special
9. Swim Qual Date:
None
1st
2nd
3rd
10b.78NOV03
Major
7c. Ht / Wt
WS NS
8.
Sail Qualification
None
A
B
11. Honors / Awards:
12. Date Completed
TRAITS
15. Equal
Opportunity:
Fairness,
respect for
human worth.
16. Organizational Support:
Contributions
towards team
and team
results.
Communication
skills.
17. Military
Bearing /
Appearance,
Physical
Fitness.
18. Character /
Conduct:
Adherence to
Navy Core
Values: Honor,
Courage and
Commitment.
NOB
13. Name/Rank of Counselor
1.0*
Below Standards
2.0
Progressing
–Displays personal
bias or engages in
harassment.
–Lacks respect for EO
objectives.
–Interferes with order
and discipline by
disregarding rights of
others.
–
–Creates conflict,
unwilling to work with
others, puts self above
team.
–Fails to understand
team goals or
teamwork techniques.
–Does not take
direction well.
–Finds excuses to get
out of Battalion
activities.
–
–Unsatisfactory
demeanor or conduct.
–Consistently
unsatisfactory
appearance.
–Unable to meet one
or more physical
readiness standards.
–
–Fails to live up to
Navy Core Values:
Honor, Courage and
Commitment.
–Frequently corrected
due to inappropriate
behavior.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
14. Signature of Individual Counseled
3.0
Meets Standards
4.0
Above
5.0
Greatly Exceeds Standards
–Always treats others
with fairness and
respect.
–Doesn't condone bias
or harassment in or
outside the battalion.
–Positively contributes
to morale and
cohesiveness.
–
–Admired for fairness and
human respect.
–Ensures a climate of
fairness and respect for
human worth.
–Leader and model
contributor to Unit
cohesiveness and morale.
–Reinforces others'
efforts, meets personal
commitments to team.
–Understands team
goals, employs good
teamwork techniques.
–Accepts and offers
team direction.
–Will volunteer if asked
to.
–
–Excellent personal
appearance.
–Excellent demeanor or
conduct.
–Complies with
physical readiness
program, within all
standards.
–
–Always lives up to
Navy Core Values:
Honor, Courage and
Commitment.
–Always behaves
correctly.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–Team builder, inspires
cooperation and progress.
–Talented mentor, focuses
goals and techniques for
team.
–The best at accepting and
offering team direction.
–Volunteers for almost
everything.
–Exemplary personal
appearance.
–Exemplary demeanor or
conduct.
-Excellent or outstanding
PFA/PFT. A leader in
physical readiness.
–Exemplifies Navy Core
Values: Honor, Courage
and Commitment.
–Personal behavior clearly
marks midshipman as
superior.
–
Enclosure (2)
Page 10 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
SAMPLE MIDSHIPMAN EVALUATION REPORT AND COUNSELING RECORD
1.0*
Below Standards
2.0
Progressing
3.0
Meets Standards
4.0
Above
5.0
Greatly Exceeds Standards
19. Mission
Accomplishment, Academic
Effort,
Initiative:
Taking
initiative,
planning,
prioritizing, and
achieving goals.
–Lacks initiative.
–Unable to plan or
prioritize.
–Fails to get job done.
–Sets unrealistic or
unchallenging goals.
–Academic achievement
has caused
midshipman to receive
a PRB (second
consecutive offense).
–
–Takes initiative to
meet goals.
–Plans / Prioritizes
effectively.
–Always gets the job
done.
–Academic
achievement clearly
demonstrates effort.
–
–Develops innovative
ways to accomplish goals.
–Plans / prioritizes with
exceptional skill and
foresight.
–Gets job done earlier and
better then expected.
–Sustained superior effort.
–Significant upward trend
over previous semester.
20. Leadership,
Followership,
Management:
Motivating,
developing
others to
accomplish
goals.
–Fails to motivate, train
or develop subordinates.
–Fails to organize, creates
problems for
subordinates.
–Lacks the ability to cope
with or tolerate stress.
–
–Effectively
motivates, trains and
develops
subordinates.
–Organizes
successfully, solves
problems as they
occur.
–
TRAITS
NOB
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–Inspiring motivator and
trainer.
–Superb organizer, great
foresight, gets ahead of
problems.
–Perseveres through the
toughest challenges.
21. Growth
Potential
22. Billet Recommendation:
23. Comments on Performance (Primary Grader).
24. Comments on Performance (Secondary Grader).
25. Comments on Performance (Officer/Instructor).
26. Midshipman Ranking
NOB
Term GPA:
Cum GPA:
Bottom
Tier
Fourth
Tier
Middle
Tier
Term Aptitude:
Cum Aptitude:
Second
Tier
Top
Tier
Individual
Summary
27. Signature of Commanding Officer
N/A
28. Signature of Midshipman Evaluated
29. MIDN Statement
Provided ? Yes
Enclosure (2)
Page 11 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
SAMPLE MIDSHIPMAN EVALUATION REPORT AND COUNSELING RECORD
1. Name (Last, First MI suffix)
MISTIC, OP T
2. Class Year
MIDN 3/C
3. Company – Squad
A-2nd SQD
4. Occasion for Report
Fall
Spring
Other
7a. PFA/PFT
7b. PFA/PFT
Date: 04NOV17
Score: GH
10a. Duties Assigned:
5. Date of Report
04DEC08
8. Sail Qualification
None
A
B
6. Type of Report
Regular
Special
9. Swim Qual Date: 03AUG28
None
1st
2nd
3rd
10b.78NOV03
Major
Chem Eng (dual w/ Mech Eng)
7c. Ht / Wt
WS NS
None
11. Honors / Awards:
Academic Stars, Dean’s List, University Community Service Award.
12. Date Completed
04OCT25
TRAITS
15. Equal
Opportunity:
Fairness,
respect for
human worth.
16. Organizational Support:
Contributions
towards team
and team
results.
Communication
skills.
17. Military
Bearing /
Appearance,
Physical
Fitness.
18. Character /
Conduct:
Adherence to
Navy Core
Values: Honor,
Courage and
Commitment.
NOB
13. Name/Rank of Counselor
SMITH, WYATT B
1.0*
Below Standards
2.0
Progressing
–Displays personal
bias or engages in
harassment.
–Lacks respect for EO
objectives.
–Interferes with order
and discipline by
disregarding rights of
others.
–
–Creates conflict,
unwilling to work with
others, puts self above
team.
–Fails to understand
team goals or
teamwork techniques.
–Does not take
direction well.
–Finds excuses to get
out of Battalion
activities.
–
–Unsatisfactory
demeanor or conduct.
–Consistently
unsatisfactory
appearance.
–Unable to meet one
or more physical
readiness standards.
–
–Fails to live up to
Navy Core Values:
Honor, Courage and
Commitment.
–Frequently corrected
due to inappropriate
behavior.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
14. Signature of Individual Counseled
Op T. Mistic
3.0
Meets Standards
4.0
Above
5.0
Greatly Exceeds Standards
–Always treats others
with fairness and
respect.
–Doesn't condone bias
or harassment in or
outside the battalion.
–Positively contributes
to morale and
cohesiveness.
–
–Admired for fairness and
human respect.
–Ensures a climate of
fairness and respect for
human worth.
–Leader and model
contributor to Unit
cohesiveness and morale.
–Reinforces others'
efforts, meets personal
commitments to team.
–Understands team
goals, employs good
teamwork techniques.
–Accepts and offers
team direction.
–Will volunteer if asked
to.
–
–Excellent personal
appearance.
–Excellent demeanor or
conduct.
–Complies with
physical readiness
program, within all
standards.
–
–Always lives up to
Navy Core Values:
Honor, Courage and
Commitment.
–Always behaves
correctly.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–Team builder, inspires
cooperation and progress.
–Talented mentor, focuses
goals and techniques for
team.
–The best at accepting and
offering team direction.
–Volunteers for almost
everything.
–Exemplary personal
appearance.
–Exemplary demeanor or
conduct.
-Excellent or outstanding
PFA/PFT. A leader in
physical readiness.
–Exemplifies Navy Core
Values: Honor, Courage
and Commitment.
–Personal behavior clearly
marks midshipman as
superior.
–
Enclosure (3)
Page 12 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
SAMPLE MIDSHIPMAN EVALUATION REPORT AND COUNSELING RECORD
1.0*
Below Standards
2.0
Progressing
3.0
Meets Standards
4.0
Above
5.0
Greatly Exceeds Standards
19. Mission
Accomplishment, Academic
Effort,
Initiative:
Taking
initiative,
planning,
prioritizing, and
achieving goals.
–Lacks initiative.
–Unable to plan or
prioritize.
–Fails to get job done.
–Sets unrealistic or
unchallenging goals.
–Academic achievement
has caused
midshipman to receive
a PRB (second
consecutive offense).
–
–Takes initiative to
meet goals.
–Plans / Prioritizes
effectively.
–Always gets the job
done.
–Academic
achievement clearly
demonstrates effort.
–
–Develops innovative
ways to accomplish goals.
–Plans / prioritizes with
exceptional skill and
foresight.
–Gets job done earlier and
better then expected.
–Sustained superior effort.
–Significant upward trend
over previous semester.
20. Leadership,
Followership,
Management:
Motivating,
developing
others to
accomplish
goals.
–Fails to motivate, train
or develop subordinates.
–Fails to organize, creates
problems for
subordinates.
–Lacks the ability to cope
with or tolerate stress.
–
–Effectively
motivates, trains and
develops
subordinates.
–Organizes
successfully, solves
problems as they
occur.
–
TRAITS
NOB
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–Inspiring motivator and
trainer.
–Superb organizer, great
foresight, gets ahead of
problems.
–Perseveres through the
toughest challenges.
21. Growth
Potential
22. Billet Recommendation: Squad Leader
23. Comments on Performance (Primary Grader).
- Always on time for PT and Lab.
- Improved PFA; but, can and should do better. Work on upper body strength.
- An average Midshipman with respect to participation in extracurricular NROTC activities.
- MIDN Mistic always has a positive attitude and a smile on his face.
MIDN 2/C Just N. Gear
24. Comments on Performance (Secondary Grader).
- A good follower who would benefit from getting more involved in unit activities. I expect this to change since he
has just finished a two year community service project that he began as a high school senior.
- Did not attend Cornell MEC and has yet to work at the Olympia.
- Never missed a PT session or lab.
MIDN 1/C Al Bicocco
25. Comments on Performance (Officer/Instructor).
Term GPA: 3.6
Term Aptitude: 4.14
- Great improvement this semester in speed on the PFA run. Super
Cum GPA: 3.42 Cum Aptitude: 3.72
attitude and desire to excel!
- An obvious engineering powerhouse - has no trouble learning difficult mathematical concepts. 4.0 in all math and
engineering subjects to date. Struggles with coherent, correctly spelled, written thought; quite noticeable on Naval
Science Essays and community outreach projects. Seek help from EDO.
- Improved upon a below average inventory PFA performance, garnering a GH during the official PFA.
- Received his university’s Community Service Award for establishing, manning and training staff for a new teen
tutoring program: The Philadelfia Inner Sity Perspective Engineerin Center fore Hi Skool
Wyatt B. Smith
Stewdents. Work on spelling and grammar!!
LT Wyatt B. Smith
- MIDN Mistic has a tremendous amount of potential to become a battalion superstar.
26. Midshipman Ranking
NOB
Bottom
Tier
Fourth
Tier
Middle
Tier
Second
Tier
Top
Tier
Individual
Summary
27. Signature of Commanding Officer
J. Bruce Hulick, Col USMC
N/A
0
1
2
28. Signature of Midshipman Evaluated
Op T. Mistic
8
3
29. MIDN Statement
Provided ? Yes
Enclosure (3)
Page 13 of 14
NROTCUPHILAINST 1601.2B
16 February 2005
Enclosure (3)
Page 14 of 14