Quantitative Reasoning: Exponential Models This material was prepared originally by Dr. Georgia Tolias for the ISP 120 course offered by the Quantitative Reasoning Center and modified by Mr. Louis Aquila for the SNL online QR course. There are numerous phenomena in nature, science, and finance that are modeled either exactly or approximately by using exponential equations. In this course we will use exponential equations to model population change, bank loans and investments and use these equations to make predictions. Definition: A quantity increases exponentially when it increases by a constant percent for each fixed unit of time. A quantity decreases exponentially when it decreases by a constant percent for each fixed unit of time. Review of Percent Change: Recall that problems involving quantities that either increase or decrease by a given percent can be dealt with in one of two equivalent ways. These are summarized in the formulas below: To increase S by r %: S + r·S = S(1 + r) where S is some initial quantity and r is a percent increase expressed in decimal form To decrease S by r %: S – r·S = S(1 – r) where S is some initial quantity and r is a percent decrease expressed in decimal form Example 1: Because of inflation, the value of the dollar decreased by 2% in each of the three successive years from 1996 to 1999. This situation is illustrated in the table below. What was the percent decrease in the value of the dollar over the entire 3-year period? Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 Inflation Rate 2% 2% 2% Solution: From 1996 to 1997, the dollar lost 2% of its buying power. Thus, it retained 98% = 0.98 of its value because 100% – 2% = 98%. So The value of the 1997 dollar was 0.98 of its 1996 value. From 1997 to 1998, the 1997 dollar lost 2% of its buying power. Thus, it retained 98% of its buying power. So, the 1998 value of the dollar was 0.98 of its 1997 value. Hence we multiply the value of the 1997 dollar by 98% = 0.98 to get that the value of the 1998 dollar was (0.98)(0.98) = 0.982 of its 1996 value. From 1998 to 1999, the 1998 dollar lost 2% of its buying power. Thus, it retained 98% of its buying power. So, the value of the 1999 dollar was 0.98 of its 1998 value. Hence we multiply the value of the 1998 dollar by 98% = 0.98 to get that the value of the 1999 dollar was (0.98)(0.982) = 0.983 of its 1996 value. Observe that 0.983 = 0.9412 = 94.12%. Thus the 1999 dollar retained 94.12% of its 1996 value. We say that compared to its value in 1996, the dollar was worth only 94.12 cents in 1999. Page 1 of 3 687321657 Note also that 100% - 94.12% = 5.88%. Hence, the dollar decreased in value by 5.88% from 1996 to 1999. Important Note: To obtain this successive percent change we performed successive multiplication by the constant factor 0.98. Example 2a: A 100 gallon tank of water is drained at a rate of 5% per day. There are two variable: Water (W) in the tank and time elapsed (T) The amount of water in the tank is uniquely determined by the time elapsed. So W is the dependent variable and T is the independent variable. Because the amount of water in the tank decreases by a fixed percentage each day, the amount of water in the tank is decreasing exponentially. The following table illustrates the situation. Time (days) T Water (gal) W 0 1 2 3 4 100 95.00 90.25 85.74 81.45 Computation Percent Change in Water for W 100 x .95 95 x .95 90.25 x .95 85.74 x .95 -5% =(95 -100)/100 -5% =(90.25 -95)/95 -5% =(85.74 -90.25)/90.25 -5% =(81.45 -85.74)/85.74 Note that since the values for W were rounded to two decimal places, the values for % change will not all be exactly 5%. Definition: An exponential equation involving two variables, say Y and T, has the form Y = A·BT, where B is the constant growth or decay factor, A is the initial value (the value of Y when T=0) and T is the time. If there is a constant percent increase, then the growth factor is B = 1 + r, where r is the percent expressed in decimal form. If there is a constant percent decrease, then the decay factor is B = 1 – r, where r is the percent expressed in decimal form. Example 2b: Find the exponential equation that describes the water draining from the tank and use the equation to predict how much water is in the tank after 10 days. Solution: Since 5% of the water is drained each day, this implies that 95% of the water remains in the tank. The constant decay factor is 100% – 5% = 95% = 0.95. Thus, the exponential equation that models the water draining from the tank is W = 100·(0.95)T To predict the amount of water after 10 days, we substitute 10 in for the T variable and find W. W = 100·(0.95)10 = 59.974 gallons. Page 2 of 3 687321657 The Graph of an Exponential Equation If a problem describes exponential growth (a constant percent increase) of some initial quantity, then the graph of the exponential equation used to model the problem is an increasing curve (As the graph is observed from left-to-right). Similarly, the graph of an exponential equation which models something decreasing by a constant percent is a decreasing curve (As the graph is observed from left-to-right). Below is the Excel graph of the exponential equation that models the water draining from the tank during the first 10 days. Water Drained at 5% per day y=100(.95)^x 120 100 gallons 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 days NOTE: If we look at only the first ten days, then the graph appears to be associated with a linear equation. However, if we continue the graph over a greater number of days, the graph’s takes on a different look. Water drained at 5% per day y = 100*.95^x 120 gallons 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 127 136 145 days These two graphs illustrate that we can be deceived by looking at a graph associated with a segment of the data. The first graph gives the appearance that the data are following a decreasing line. Whereas, if we restricted ourselves, in the second graph, to the data starting with day 82, it appears that the data are essentially located on the horizontal axis. We need to be very cautious when analyzing data, or looking at the conclusions based on someone else’s analysis. Page 3 of 3 687321657