4.3 [a]. Path 1 (roof): Start 1 3 5 7 8 End Path 2 (base): Start 1 2 4 6 7 8 End The theoretical flow time of path 1 is 100 mins and that of path 2 is 127 mins. Path 2 is then the critical path and the theoretical flow time for the Deluxe model is 127 minutes. [b]. length of paths 1 and 2 are to 92.5 and 110.5 minutes respectively. theoretical flow time for a mixture of 75% standard and 25% Deluxe is 110.5 minutes. [c]. 110.5/4800 = 2.3% 4.4 [a] See figure 1 below Figure 1: Flow Chart for Problem Set 4.4 (a) 2 min 1 min 3 min molding aut. molding machine start eng. ass. 1 molding operator welding 1 min 3 min stamping 1 engine assembler 30 min continuous welding machine FA 1 welder end 2 min 10,000lbs press 1 press operator 10 final assemblers 7 min seat ass. 2 seat assemblers [b] the critical path is the longest path = 37 minutes (going through seat assembly). the theoretical flow time = 37 minutes. [c] try to change the design and process so that we can perform subtasks parallel. Easiest is to do final assembly of the first three subassemblies first and seat assembly at the end. 4.5 [a] A process map Activity Activity F1 A 15 min Process And 10 Separate min B F2 10 min Activity Loan Officer 15 min C 20 min [b] The theoretical flow time is 50 minutes. The critical path is Activity A, Activity B, Loan Officer. [c] The flow time efficiency is 50/7*480 = 50/ 3360= 1.49% 4.6 [a]. theoretical flow time: 17 seconds: For passenger without additional check (80% of passangers), the theoretical flow time is (1.5/18)*60 = 5 seconds For passengers with additional check the theoretical flow time: 65 seconds The theoretical flow time for an average passenger : 80% *5 + 20% * 65 = 17 seconds [b] flow time efficiency : 17/ 135 = 12.5% Problem 5.2 Flow unit = 1 order of 1 dozen. [a]. 1. The theoretical capacities of the resources are: Kristen = 7.5 orders/hour; RM = 15 orders/hour; Oven = 6 orders/hour min. 2. Process Theoretical Capacity = 6 orders of 1 dozen/hr. The oven is the theoretical bottleneck. [b] Utilization at full capacity: Kristen = 80%; RM = 40%; Oven = 100%. [c] 1. Purchasing an additional oven doubles the oven resources pool capacity to 12 orders per hour. The process capacity, however, is only increased to 7.5 orders per hour as the bottleneck shifts to Kristen. 2. cross training increases the process capacity to 10 orders per hour. Problem 5.3 [a] The theoretical capacity is 1.2 garages per hour or $360 per hour. [b] The bottlenecks are Punch Press –B and Worker PB with a theoretical capacity of 1.5 flow units per hour. Unit Load Resource Pool Load (minutes Batch per unit) Theoretical Capacity Number Theoretical Capacity of a Resource Unit of Units of a Resource Pool (flow units per hour) (flow units per hour) Worker-S 10 1 6.00 1 6.00 Punch Press-R 30 1 2.00 1 2.00 Punch Press-B 50 1 1.20 1 1.20 Worker-PR 30 1 2.00 1 2.00 Worker-PB 50 1 1.20 1 1.20 Forming MachineR 15 1 4.00 1 4.00 Forming MachineB 15 1 4.00 1 4.00 Worker-FR 15 1 4.00 1 4.00 Worker-FB 15 1 4.00 1 4.00 Welding Gun 20 1 3.00 1 3.00 Worker-SA 20 1 3.00 1 3.00 Worker-FA 26 1 2.31 1 2.31 Inspector 50 1 1.20 2 2.40 Table TM-5.1: Theoretical Capacity for Super Garage at MBPF, Inc. Unit Load (minutes per unit) Resource Pool Standar Fanc Super d y 50%25%- Theoretical Capacity Numbe r of a Resource Unit of Units 25% Mix (flow units per hour) Theoretical Capacity of a Resource Pool (flow units per hour) Worker-S 10 10 10 10 6.00 1 6.00 Punch Press-R 22 30 30 26 2.31 1 2.31 Punch Press-B 30 50 50 40 1.50 1 1.50 Worker-PR 22 30 30 26 2.31 1 2.31 Worker-PB 30 50 50 40 1.50 1 1.50 Forming Machine-R 12 15 15 13.5 4.44 1 4.44 Forming Machine-B 6 10 15 9.25 6.49 1 6.49 Worker-FR 12 15 15 13.5 4.44 1 4.44 Worker-FB 6 10 15 9.25 6.49 1 6.49 Welding Gun 13 20 20 16.5 3.64 1 3.64 Worker-SA 13 20 20 16.5 3.64 1 3.64 Worker-FA 10 15 26 15.25 3.93 1 3.93 Inspector 36 40 50 40.5 1.48 2 2.96 Table TM-5.2: Theoretical Capacity of 50% Standard, 25% Fancy, and 25% Super garages at MBPF, Inc. 5.5 [a] The profit from HC is 10* 375 = $3750 per day. The profit from PC is 9 * 545 = $ 4905 per day [b] the best mix is 400 PC and 100 units of HC per day. 5.7 [a]. The bottleneck are the stylists. [b] The theoretical capacity will increase to 7.2 customers per hour: If LuLu does the billing, the unit load of the stylists is reduced to 25 minutes per customer, and their theoretical capacity increases to 3* 60/ 25 = 7.2 customers per hour. On the other hand, Lulu’s unit load increases to 3+5 = 8 minutes per hour, and her capacity decreases to 60/8=7.5 customers per hour.